The Impact of Digital Environment vs. Traditional Method on Literacy Skills; Reading and Writing of Emirati Fourth Graders
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Overview
1.2. Statement of the Problem
1.3. Study Question
1.4. Purpose of the Study
- ▪
- To determine the necessary reading skills for fourth-grade students in the third cycle of schools in the UAE.
- ▪
- To determine the creative expression skills of fourth-grade students in the third cycle of schools in the UAE.
- ▪
- To reveal the effectiveness of the digital learning platform strategy for the development of reading skills and creative written expression in the United Arab Emirates.
1.5. Significance of This Study
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Framework
2.2. Studies about Digital Environments
2.3. Digital Learning Platforms in the UAE
2.4. Reading Skills
2.5. Creative Written Expression
2.6. Summary of Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Design
3.2. The Research Sample
3.3. Research Instrument
3.4. Data Collection and Analysis
4. The Results
4.1. Reading Skills Test and Writing Skills Test (Pre-Test)
4.2. Reading Skills Test and Writing Skills Test (Post-Test)
- ▪
- The platforms played a large role in capturing the students’ attention, prompting them to engage in positive interaction.
- ▪
- The benefit from multimedia networks and access to additional information.
- ▪
- They provide the opportunity for students and the teacher to add comments, and thus work to enhance the spirit of competition among students.
- ▪
- The use of videos and images contributed to the difference between the students’ scores in the before and after the intervention.
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
7. Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abuhattab, S.Y. The Impact of Digital Text vs. Print Text on the Seventh-Grade Students’ Reading Achievement, Metacognitive Strategies, and Motivation. Ph.D. Thesis, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates, 2017. Available online: https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/all_theses/637 (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Alexander, E.S.; Onwuegbuzie, A.J. Academic procrastination and the role of hope as a coping strategy. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2007, 42, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alotaibi, A.; Khalil, I.; Wardat, Y. Teaching practices of the mathematics male and female teachers according to the PISA framework and its relation to their beliefs towards their students. Elem. Educ. Online 2021, 20, 1247–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chamberlain, L.; Lacina, J.; Bintz, W.P.; Jimerson, J.B.; Payne, K.; Zingale, R. Literacy in lockdown: Learning and teaching during COVID-19 school closures. Read. Teach. 2020, 74, 243–253. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.S.; Petscher, Y.; Schatschneider, C.; Foorman, B. Does growth rate in oral reading fluency matter in predicting reading comprehension achievement? J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 102, 652. [Google Scholar]
- Gningue, S.M.; Peach, R.; Jarrah, A.M.; Wardat, Y. The Relationship between Teacher Leadership and School Climate: Findings from a Teacher-Leadership Project. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huntley, D.E. An Applied Research on Promoting Proficiency in Fourth-Grade Reading. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Warner-Griffin, C.; Liu, H.; Tadler, C.; Herget, D.; Dalton, B. Reading Achievement of U.S. Fourth-Grade Students in an International Context: First Look at the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2016 and ePIRLS 2016 (NCES 2018-017); U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
- Torres, R. Factors Affecting the Reading Comprehension of Intermediate Level Learners: Basis for an Intervention Program. 2019. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351451654_Factors_Affecting_the_Reading_Comprehension_of_Intermediate_Level_Learners_Basis_for_An_Intervention_Program/citation/download (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Hughes, J.; Kwok, O.M. Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. J. Educ. Psychol. 2007, 99, 39. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Abdul-Ameer, M.A. Improving vocabulary learning through digital stories with Iraqi young learners of English at the primary level. J. Stud. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8. Available online: https://www.infinitypress.info/index.php/jsss/article/view/821 (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Abu Elenein, A.H. The effect of utilizing digital storytelling on developing oral communication skills for 5th grade students at rafah primary schools. Int. J. Lang. Lit. Stud. 2019, 1, 30–46. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, M.M.; Bashir, A.; Ikram Anjum, M.A.; Mahmood, M.A. Impact of Mobile Assisted Language Learning on the Young ESL Learners’ Vocabulary in Pakistan. J. Res. Reflect. Educ. 2020, 14. Available online: http://jrre.ue.edu.pk/index.php/JRRE/article/view/98 (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Amelia, L.C.H.; Abidin, M.J.Z. Young ESL learners’ perception on the effects of using digital storytelling application in English language learning. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2018, 26, 179–198. [Google Scholar]
- Chiong, C.; Ree, J.; Takeuchi, L.; Erickson, I. Comparing Parent-Child Co-Reading on Print, Basic, and Enhanced e-Book Platforms; The Joan Ganz Cooney Center: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W.; Clark, V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ghalebandi, S.G.; Noorhidawati, A. Engaging children with pleasure reading: The E-reading experience. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2019, 56, 1213–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Sullivan, A. Reading and Arab college students: Issues in the United Arab Emirates Higher Colleges of Technology. In Proceedings of the First International Online Conference on Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Research: Beyond Borders, Symposium Conducted at First International Online Conference on Second and Foreign Language Teaching and Research. 2004. Available online: https://www.academia.edu/1012284/Reading_and_Arab_college_students_Issues_in_the_United_Arab_Emirates_Higher_Colleges_of_Technology (accessed on 20 June 2022).
- Mustafa, G.S.H. English Language Teaching and Learning at Government Schools in the United Arab Emirates. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK, 2001. Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
- Hamad, S.; Tairab, H.; Wardat, Y.; Rabbani, L.; AlArabi, K.; Yousif, M.; Abu-Al-Aish, A.; Stoica, G. Understanding Science Teachers’ Implementations of Integrated STEM: Teacher Perceptions and Practice. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- binti Talib, N.; binti Ahmad, N.; binti Sakarji, S.R. Students’problems in learning english as a second language among mdab students at uitm malacca. Int. J. 2019, 2, 01–12. [Google Scholar]
- Street, B. Literacy and Development: Ethnographic Perspectives; Routledge: London, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Leong, A.C.H.; Abidin, M.J.Z.; Saibon, J. Learners’ perceptions of the impact of using digital storytelling on vocabulary learning. Teach. Engl. Technol. 2019, 19, 3–26. [Google Scholar]
- Chamcharatsri, B.; Iida, A. (Eds.) International Perspectives on Creative Writing in Second Language Education: Supporting Language Learners’ Proficiency, Identity, and Creative Expression; Routledge: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Duke, N.K. Strategies for Internet reading with different reading purposes: A descriptive study of twelve good Internet readers. J. Lit. Res. 2008, 40, 128–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granić, A.; Marangunić, N. Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 50, 2572–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, S.G. The Ethics of Internet Research. Online J. Nurs. Inform. 2012, 16. Available online: http://ojni.org/issues/?p=1708 (accessed on 2 March 2022).
- Bennett, C. Genres of research in multicultural education. Rev. Educ. Res. 2011, 71, 171–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patronis, M. The Effect of using the iPad on students’ performance in writing and reading comprehension: Pilot Study Report. Arab. World Engl. J. 2014, 2014, 67–80. [Google Scholar]
- Ciampa, K. Reading in the Digital Age: Using Electronic Books as a Teaching Tool for Beginning Readers/La lecture à l’ère numérique: L’utilisation de livres électroniques comme outil d’enseignement pour les lecteurs débutants. Can. J. Learn. Technol. /La Rev. Can. De l’Apprentiss. Et De La Technol. 2012, 38. Available online: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/42890/ (accessed on 1 March 2022). [CrossRef]
- Collins, A.; Brown, J.S.; Newman, S.E. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing, Learning, and Instruction; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 453–494. [Google Scholar]
- Wells, C.L. Do Students Using Electronic Books Display Different Reading Comprehension and Motivation Levels than Students Using Traditional Print Books? Ph.D. Thesis, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Have, I.; Pedersen, B.S. Sonic mediatization of the book: Affordances of the audiobook. J. Media Commun. Res. 2018, 29, 123–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.M.; Chiu, P.S. The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2014, 46, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maboe, E.; Smith, C.; Banoobhai, M.; Makgato, M. Implementing tablets to teach Reading in Grade 5. Read. Writ. 2018, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maynard, S. The impact of e-Books on young children’s reading habits. Publ. Res. Q. 2020, 26, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.-H.; Lin, W.-Y. A Study on the Relationship between English Reading Comprehension and English Vocabulary Knowledge. Educ. Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 209154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.H.; Khuat, T.T.N. Learning vocabulary through games: The effectiveness of learning vocabulary through games. Asian EFL J. 2018, 4, 68–82. [Google Scholar]
- Norte, P.; Negreiros, J.; Correia, A. Cultivating students’ reading literacy using digital lexile-based reading in a Chinese primary school. Int. Assoc. Dev. Inf. Soc. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şahin, A. Effects of linear texts in page scrolling and page-by-page reading forms on reading comprehension introduction. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 2019, 10, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, J.; Staats, W.; Bowling, N.; Bickel, R.; Cunningham, M.; Cadle, C. An evaluation of the Merit reading and software program in the Calhoun County (WV) middle/high school. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 2005, 37, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Instrument | Group | Number | Mean | Standard Deviation | Values “T” | Degrees of Freedom | Statistical Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reading Test | Experimental | 30 | 2.89 | 0.328 | −0.440 | 58 | 0.66 |
Control | 30 | 2.92 | 0.254 | ||||
Writing Test | Experimental | 30 | 2.85 | 0.297 | −0.712 | 58 | 0.48 |
Control | 30 | 2.90 | 0.208 |
Group | The Test | Average | Standard Error | The Number | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arithmetic Mean | Standard Deviation | |||||
Reading skill test | experimental | 2.21 | 0.145 | 2.205 | 0.032 | 60 |
control | 2.88 | 0.194 | 2.877 | 0.032 | 60 | |
total | 2.54 | 0.378 | 2.541 | 0.022 | 120 |
Contrast Source | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Squares | Statistical Value (p) | Statistical Significance (H) | Impact Size (η2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reading skill test | test | 0.014 | 1 | 0.014 | 0.466 | 0.497 | 0.008 |
group | 6.702 | 1 | 6.702 | 225.605 | 0.000 | 0.798 | |
error | 1.693 | 57 | 0.030 | ||||
average total | 8.414 | 59 |
Group | Dimensional | Average | Standard Error | The Number | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arithmetic Mean | Standard Deviation | |||||
Creative written expression test | experimental | 2.20 | 0.188 | 2.201 | 0.031 | 60 |
Control | 2.87 | 0.144 | 2.82.871 | 0.031 | 60 | |
the total | 2.54 | 0.376 | 2.536 | 0.022 | 120 |
Contrast Source | Sum of Squares | Degrees of Freedom | Mean Squares | Statistical Value (p) | Statistical Significance (H) | Impact size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
test | 0.000 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.017 | 0.896 | 0.000 |
method | 6.667 | 1 | 6.667 | 234.022 | 0.000 | 0.804 |
error | 1.624 | 57 | 0.028 | |||
average total | 8.360 | 59 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Alneyadi, S.; Abulibdeh, E.; Wardat, Y. The Impact of Digital Environment vs. Traditional Method on Literacy Skills; Reading and Writing of Emirati Fourth Graders. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043418
Alneyadi S, Abulibdeh E, Wardat Y. The Impact of Digital Environment vs. Traditional Method on Literacy Skills; Reading and Writing of Emirati Fourth Graders. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4):3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043418
Chicago/Turabian StyleAlneyadi, Saif, Enas Abulibdeh, and Yousef Wardat. 2023. "The Impact of Digital Environment vs. Traditional Method on Literacy Skills; Reading and Writing of Emirati Fourth Graders" Sustainability 15, no. 4: 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043418
APA StyleAlneyadi, S., Abulibdeh, E., & Wardat, Y. (2023). The Impact of Digital Environment vs. Traditional Method on Literacy Skills; Reading and Writing of Emirati Fourth Graders. Sustainability, 15(4), 3418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043418