A Design Proposal for an Eco-Tunnel for Anurans Based on Behavioral Experiments and Species Characteristics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Species Selection
2.2. Animal Capture and Housing
2.3. Structure Design and Experimental Setting
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kang, W.M. Network Analyses of Habitat Connectivity for Biodiversity of Urban Forest Birds, Forest Mammals, and a Threatened Tree Species; Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Woo, D.; Choi, T.; Seo, H.; Lee, H.; Park, H.; Moon, H. A Study on Analysis of Habitat Fragmentation and Improvement of Wildlife Passage Effectiveness; National Institute of Ecology: Seochoeon, Republic of Korea, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Žák, J.; Kraus, M.; Machová, P.; Plachý, J. Smart green bridge-wildlife crossing bridges of new generation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 728, 012010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bridges, A. Territory Eco-link: Large framework, small budget. In Innovation for 21st Century Conservation; Australian Committee for IUCN Inc.: Sydney, Australia, 2012; pp. 72–77. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.H.; Yoo, J.S.; Shin, J.H.; Shin, M.J. A Study on the landscape preference by visual components of Eco-corridor. J. Korea. Landsc. Council. 2022, 14, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, Y.S.; Shim, Y.J. A study on the guidelines for creating wildlife crossing through environmental impact assessment. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 2019, 28, 287. [Google Scholar]
- Yoon, J.H. A Study on Improvement for the Eco-Way (Escaping Facility on Waterway) Helping Wild Animals’ Migration; Korea National University of Transportation: Chung-Ju, Republic of Korea, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.J. Design Method on Ecological Corridors for Efficient Migration of Amphibians; Chung Ang University: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Franch, M.; Silva, C.; Lopes, G.; Ribeiro, F.; Trigueiros, P.; Seco, L.; Sillero, N. Where to look when identifying roadkilled amphibians? Acta Herpetol. 2015, 10, 103–110. [Google Scholar]
- Hallisey, N.; Buchanan, S.W.; Gerber, B.D.; Corcoran, L.S.; Karraker, N.E. Estimating road mortality hotspots while accounting for imperfect detection: A case study with amphibians and reptiles. Land 2022, 11, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos, C.; Sillero, N.; Argaña, E. Spatial analysis of amphibian road mortality levels in northern Portugal country roads. Amphib Reptil. 2012, 33, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonoda, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Matsue, M. Current situation and issues with regard to studies of road-kill, barrier effect and the mitigation techniques on wild animals. Landsc. Res. Jpn. 2014, 4, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Wake, D.B.; Vredenburg, V.T. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 11466–11473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glista, D.J.; DeVault, T.L.; DeWoody, J.A. Vertebrate road mortality predominantly impacts amphibians. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 3, 77–87. [Google Scholar]
- Cho, D.G. Ecological Restoration Planning and Design; A Publishing Department of Nexus Institute of Environmental Design: Incheon, Republic of Korea, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Woltz, H.W.; Gibbs, J.P.; Ducey, P.K. Road crossing structures for amphibians and reptiles: Informing design through behavioral analysis. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2745–2750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patrick, D.A.; Schalk, C.M.; Gibbs, J.P.; Woltz, H.W. Effective culvert placement and design to facilitate passage of amphibians across roads. J. Herpetol. 2010, 44, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brehm, K. The acceptance of 0.2-m tunnels by amphibians during their migration to the breeding site. In Amphibians and Roads Proceedings of the Toad Tunnel Conference; ACO Polymer Products: Shefford, UK, 1989; pp. 29–42. [Google Scholar]
- Podloucky, R. Protection of amphibians on roads-examples and experiences from Lower Saxony. In Amphibians and Roads Proceedings of the Toad Tunnel Conference; ACO Polymer Products: Shefford, UK, 1989; pp. 15–28. [Google Scholar]
- Langton, T.E. Amphibians and roads; proceedings of the Toad Tunnel Conference, Rendsburg, Federal Republic of Germany. In Proceedings of the Toad Tunnel Conference, Rendsburg, Germany, 7–8 January 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Karraker, N.E.; Gibbs, J.P. Contrasting road effect signals in reproduction of long-versus short-lived amphibians. Hydrobiologia 2011, 664, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helldin, J.O.; Petrovan, S.O. Effectiveness of small road tunnels and fences in reducing amphibian roadkill and barrier effects at retrofitted roads in Sweden. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McHugh, M.L. The chi-square test of independence. Biochem. Med. 2013, 23, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nakano, Y.; Senzaki, M.; Ishiyama, N.; Yamanaka, S.; Miura, K.; Nakamura, F. Noise pollution alters matrix permeability for dispersing anurans: Differential effects among land covers. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2018, 16, e00484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishikuro, H.; Iwai, N. Effects of noise and light on breeding and oviposition site selection by frogs in urban ponds. Jpn. J. Ecol. 2018, 23, 177–186. [Google Scholar]
Category/Species | Home Range (40%) | Protection Value (30%) | Road Kill (30%) | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bufo gargarizans | very wide | 0.4 | middle | 0.2 | high | 0.3 | 0.9 |
Bufo stejnegeri | wide | 0.3 | middle | 0.2 | high | 0.3 | 0.8 |
Bombina orientalis | wide | 0.3 | middle | 0.2 | high | 0.3 | 0.8 |
Kaloula borealis | wide | 0.3 | high | 0.3 | low | 0.1 | 0.7 |
Rana huanrenensis | wide | 0.3 | middle | 0.2 | middle | 0.2 | 0.7 |
Rana uenoi | very wide | 0.4 | middle | 0.2 | high | 0.3 | 0.9 |
Rana coreana | wide | 0.3 | middle | 0.2 | middle | 0.2 | 0.7 |
Rana nigromaculata | narrow | 0.2 | middle | 0.2 | middle | 0.2 | 0.6 |
Rana chosenica | narrow | 0.2 | high | 0.3 | low | 0.1 | 0.6 |
Rana rugosa | wide | 0.3 | middle | 0.2 | low | 0.1 | 0.6 |
Hyla japonica | narrow | 0.2 | middle | 0.2 | middle | 0.2 | 0.6 |
Hyla suweonensis | narrow | 0.2 | high | 0.3 | low | 0.1 | 0.6 |
Environmental Factor | Conditions |
---|---|
Noise level | Noise standards were set at 40, 50, 60, and 70 dB by installing the sound source at the destination point of the crossing structure and playing a recording of the noises generated by vehicles. The noise standard was expanded considering the 50–60 dB of background noise generated in daily life. |
Tunnel width | Crossing structures of different diameters were installed: D300 (mm), D500 (mm), D700 (mm), and D1000 (mm). Four sizes were used by referring to the standards recommended by the Korean Ministry of Environment: D500 (mm) and D1000 (mm). |
Light-shielding level | A U-shaped plume pipe of the same size was installed in four directions, and a light-shielding film (35%, 50%, 75%, and 90%) was installed on the pipe. Behavioral experiments were conducted in conditions of sunlight without shade. |
Tunnel substrate | PE (polyethylene) pipes of the same size (D600) were installed in four directions. The floor material inside the pipe was either soil, concrete, gravel, or PVC (polyvinyl chloride). |
Construction material | PVC and concrete were used based on their improved performance and to facilitate tunnel maintenance. |
Tunnel shape | Circular and square crossing structures were arranged horizontally, and the same tunnel width (D600) was maintained. |
Environmental Factor | Experimental Species | Total | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bombina orientalis | Bufo gargarizans | Rana uenoi | |||
Noise | 40 dB | 19 | 34 | 23 | 76 (19.79%) |
50 dB | 29 | 36 | 25 | 90 (23.44%) | |
60 dB | 45 | 43 | 39 | 127 (33.07%) | |
70 dB | 37 | 35 | 19 | 91 (23.70%) | |
Tunnel width | D1000 | 16 | 72 | 38 | 126 (31.82%) |
D700 | 50 | 20 | 53 | 123 (31.06%) | |
D500 | 23 | 26 | 34 | 83 (20.96%) | |
D300 | 21 | 32 | 11 | 64 (16.16%) | |
Light transmission | 90% | 33 | 41 | 57 | 131 (31.19%) |
75% | 19 | 38 | 51 | 108 (25.71%) | |
50% | 25 | 39 | 25 | 89 (21.19%) | |
35% | 43 | 32 | 17 | 92 (21.90%) | |
Tunnel substrate | Soil | 35 | 41 | 65 | 141 (34.22%) |
Concrete | 27 | 46 | 24 | 97 (23.54%) | |
Gravel | 33 | 36 | 23 | 92 (22.33%) | |
PVC | 24 | 29 | 29 | 82 (19.90%) | |
Construction material | PVC | 51 | 97 | 86 | 234 (55.71%) |
Concrete | 75 | 53 | 58 | 186 (44.29%) | |
Tunnel shape | Circle | 89 | 61 | 79 | 229 (53.88%) |
Rectangle | 52 | 89 | 55 | 196 (46.12%) |
Species | Noise | Chi-Square (p-Value) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | 40 dB | 50 dB | 60 dB | 70 dB | ||
Bombina orientalis | First | 4 | 9 | 18 | 10 | 7.646 (0.265) |
Second | 6 | 11 | 13 | 7 | ||
Third | 9 | 9 | 13 | 19 | ||
Bufo gargarizans | First | 12 | 16 | 12 | 10 | 3.489 (0.745) |
Second | 12 | 10 | 14 | 13 | ||
Third | 10 | 10 | 17 | 12 | ||
Rana uenoi | First | 5 | 9 | 15 | 4 | 13.336 (0.038) |
Second | 3 | 9 | 15 | 6 | ||
Third | 15 | 7 | 9 | 9 |
Division | Tunnel Width | Chi-Square (p-Value) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | D1000 | D700 | D500 | D300 | ||
Bombina orientalis | First | 2 | 20 | 5 | 8 | Fisher (0.010) |
Second | 5 | 8 | 12 | 2 | ||
Third | 9 | 22 | 6 | 11 | ||
Bufo gargarizans | First | 28 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 4.464 (0.614) |
Second | 23 | 7 | 10 | 10 | ||
Third | 21 | 9 | 10 | 10 | ||
Rana uenoi | First | 14 | 19 | 13 | 4 | Fisher (0.479) |
Second | 14 | 23 | 9 | 2 | ||
Third | 10 | 11 | 12 | 5 |
Species | Light Transmission | Chi-Square (p-Value) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | 90% | 75% | 50% | 35% | ||
Bombina orientalis | First | 16 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 34.076 (<0.001) |
Second | 11 | 2 | 12 | 8 | ||
Third | 6 | 11 | 5 | 28 | ||
Bufo gargarizans | First | 16 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 16.928 (0.009) |
Second | 17 | 15 | 6 | 12 | ||
Third | 8 | 8 | 20 | 14 | ||
Rana uenoi | First | 19 | 18 | 8 | 5 | 5.653 (0.463) |
Second | 18 | 21 | 5 | 6 | ||
Third | 20 | 12 | 12 | 6 |
Species | Tunnel Substrate | Chi-Square (p-Value) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Soil | Concrete | Gravel | Rice Straw | ||
Bombina orientalis | First | 3 | 9 | 15 | 6 | 31.089 (<0.001) |
Second | 4 | 9 | 13 | 7 | ||
Third | 27 | 8 | 5 | 10 | ||
Bufo gargarizans | First | 18 | 15 | 8 | 9 | 9.336 (0.155) |
Second | 14 | 10 | 14 | 12 | ||
Third | 9 | 20 | 13 | 8 | ||
Rana uenoi | First | 34 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 24.447 (<0.001) |
Second | 19 | 8 | 8 | 15 | ||
Third | 12 | 6 | 12 | 11 |
Species | Construction Material | Chi-Square (p-Value) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Concrete | PE Pipe | ||
Bombina orientalis | First | 25 | 15 | 0.300 (0.860) |
Second | 21 | 14 | ||
Third | 29 | 21 | ||
Bufo gargarizans | First | 20 | 30 | 0.758 (0.684) |
Second | 17 | 33 | ||
Third | 16 | 34 | ||
Rana uenoi | First | 23 | 27 | 6.189 (0.045) |
Second | 24 | 26 | ||
Third | 11 | 33 |
Species | Tunnel Shape | Chi-Square (p-Value) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Experiment | Circle | Square | ||
Bombina orientalis | First | 30 | 13 | 4.184 (0.123) |
Second | 30 | 13 | ||
Third | 27 | 23 | ||
Bufo gargarizans | First | 18 | 32 | 1.049 (0.591) |
Second | 23 | 27 | ||
Third | 20 | 30 | ||
Rana uenoi | First | 32 | 18 | 9.480 (0.008) |
Second | 29 | 11 | ||
Third | 18 | 26 |
Division | Species | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Bombina orientalis | Bufo gargarizans | Rana uenoi | ||
Noise | 40 dB | 19 | 34 | 23 |
50 dB | 29 | 36 | 25 | |
60 dB | 45 | 43 | 39 | |
70 dB | 37 | 35 | 19 | |
Chi-square (p-value) | 11.415 (0.009) | 1.351 (0.717) | 8.566 (0.035) | |
Width | D1000 | 16 | 72 | 38 |
D700 | 50 | 20 | 53 | |
D500 | 23 | 26 | 34 | |
D300 | 21 | 32 | 11 | |
Chi-square (p-value) | 25.491 (<0.001) | 44.24 (<0.001) | 26.647 (<0.001) | |
Light transmission | 90% | 33 | 41 | 57 |
75% | 19 | 38 | 51 | |
50% | 25 | 39 | 25 | |
35% | 43 | 32 | 17 | |
Chi-square (p-value) | 10.8 (0.012) | 1.2 (0.753) | 30.373 (<0.001) | |
Tunnel substrate | Soil | 35 | 41 | 65 |
Concrete | 27 | 46 | 24 | |
Gravel | 33 | 36 | 23 | |
PVC | 24 | 29 | 29 | |
Chi-square (p-value) | 2.647 (0.449) | 4.157 (0.244) | 34.064 (<0.001) | |
Construction material | PVC | 51 | 97 | 86 |
Concrete | 75 | 53 | 58 | |
Chi-square (p-value) | 4.571 (0.032) | 12.907 (<0.001) | 5.444 (0.019) | |
Tunnel shape | Circle | 89 | 61 | 79 |
Rectangle | 52 | 89 | 55 | |
Chi-square (p-value) | 9.709 (0.001) | 5.226 (0.022) | 4.298 (0.038) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Seol, G.H.; Kim, E.B.; Kim, Y.E.; Kim, N.C.; Kim, H. A Design Proposal for an Eco-Tunnel for Anurans Based on Behavioral Experiments and Species Characteristics. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043501
Seol GH, Kim EB, Kim YE, Kim NC, Kim H. A Design Proposal for an Eco-Tunnel for Anurans Based on Behavioral Experiments and Species Characteristics. Sustainability. 2023; 15(4):3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043501
Chicago/Turabian StyleSeol, Gu Ho, Eun Bum Kim, Ye Eun Kim, Nam Choon Kim, and Hyun Kim. 2023. "A Design Proposal for an Eco-Tunnel for Anurans Based on Behavioral Experiments and Species Characteristics" Sustainability 15, no. 4: 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043501
APA StyleSeol, G. H., Kim, E. B., Kim, Y. E., Kim, N. C., & Kim, H. (2023). A Design Proposal for an Eco-Tunnel for Anurans Based on Behavioral Experiments and Species Characteristics. Sustainability, 15(4), 3501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043501