Next Article in Journal
Determinants of Household Food Security during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia
Next Article in Special Issue
New Policy Research on Education Development and Global Citizenship in a Sustainable Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Lithium Technology Safety Issues: A Bibliometric Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comprehensive Benefit of Crop Straw Return Volume under Sustainable Development Management Concept in Heilongjiang, China

1
School of Transportation, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
2
College of Automotive Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
3
College of Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4129; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054129
Submission received: 12 January 2023 / Revised: 6 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 24 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intelligent Information Systems and Operations Management)

Abstract

Straw burning can cause serious environmental pollution, whereas returning straw to the fields, as a green production method, can improve the rural environment and strengthen the sustainable development of agriculture. According to statistics, China produced 797 million tons of straw in 2020, but the current straw return technology still needs to be improved; the ability of farmers to choose the correct amount of straw to be returned to the field and their awareness of environmental protection still need to be strengthened. Straw is still openly burned in some areas, causing environmental pollution and the waste of resources, which are contrary to the concept of sustainable development in China. In this study, we estimated the amount of straw resources in Heilongjiang Province, a major grain-producing province in China, by quantifying the production of major crops between 2011 and 2020. We then identified and analyzed the current problems in terms of policy support and other aspects. We used an integrated AHP-fuzzy evaluation method to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of different straw return amounts, and we determined the amount of straw that should be returned to the soil to produce the best comprehensive benefits. We provide suggestions for the current main problems regarding the amount of crop straw to return to the soil in Heilongjiang Province, arguing that choosing a reasonable straw return amount will help farmers increase profit, reduce environmental pollution, and contribute to the sustainable development of the environment.
Keywords: sustainable development of the environment; crop straw return volume; resource reuse; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; performance evaluation sustainable development of the environment; crop straw return volume; resource reuse; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; performance evaluation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Li, X.; Zhao, H.; Lin, C. Comprehensive Benefit of Crop Straw Return Volume under Sustainable Development Management Concept in Heilongjiang, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054129

AMA Style

Mao J, Zhao Z, Li X, Zhao H, Lin C. Comprehensive Benefit of Crop Straw Return Volume under Sustainable Development Management Concept in Heilongjiang, China. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mao, Jia, Ziang Zhao, Xiangyu Li, Honggang Zhao, and Ciyun Lin. 2023. "Comprehensive Benefit of Crop Straw Return Volume under Sustainable Development Management Concept in Heilongjiang, China" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054129

APA Style

Mao, J., Zhao, Z., Li, X., Zhao, H., & Lin, C. (2023). Comprehensive Benefit of Crop Straw Return Volume under Sustainable Development Management Concept in Heilongjiang, China. Sustainability, 15(5), 4129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop