Using Time-to-Event Model in Seed Germination Test to Evaluate Maturity during Cow Dung Composting
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Composting and Compost
2.2. Seed Germination Test with Compost Water Extract
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Effect of Compost on Germination of Chinese Cabbage Seeds
3.2. Effect of Compost on Germination of Garden Cress Seeds
3.3. Relation between the Indicators in Seed Germination Test
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Khoshnevisan, B.; Duan, N.; Tsapekos, P.; Awasthi, M.; Liu, Z.; Mohammadi, A.; Angelidaki, I.; Tsang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Pan, J. A critical review on livestock manure biorefinery technologies: Sustainability, challenges, and future perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 135, 110033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Komilis, D. Compost quality: Is research still needed to assess it or do we have enough knowledge? Waste Manag. 2015, 38, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chang, R.; Guo, Q.; Pandey, P.; Li, Y.; Chen, Q.; Sun, Y. Pretreatment by composting increased the utilization proportion of pig manure biogas digestate and improved the seedling substrate quality. Waste Manag. 2021, 129, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, Y.; Liang, J.; Zeng, G.; Chen, M.; Mo, D.; Li, G.; Zhang, D. Seed germination test for toxicity evaluation of compost: Its roles, problems and prospects. Waste Manag. 2018, 71, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Komilis, D.; Tziouvaras, I. A statistical analysis to assess the maturity and stability of six composts. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 1504–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ribeiro-Oliveira, J.; Ranal, M. Sample size in studies on the germination process. Botany 2016, 94, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onofri, A.; Benincasa, P.; Mesgaran, M.; Ritz, C. Hydrothermal-time-to-event models for seed germination. Eur. J. Agron. 2018, 101, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luo, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liang, J.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, H. Antibiotic of tetracycline can delay water absorption and germination of Brassica seeds even at low concentrations and it is dependent on seed inherent characteristics. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 46885–46897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weitbrecht, K.; Müller, K.; Leubner-Metzger, G. First off the mark: Early seed germination. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3289–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Cheng, H.; Luo, Y.; Oh, K.; Meng, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, N.; Chang, M. Seedling establishment test for the comprehensive evaluation of compost phytotoxicity. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritz, C.; Pipper, C.; Streibig, J. Analysis of germination data from agricultural experiments. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 45, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soltani, E.; Ghaderi-Far, F.; Baskin, C.; Baskin, J. Problems with using mean germination time to calculate rate of seed germination. Aust. J. Bot. 2015, 63, 631–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, B.; Rizzo, P.; Riera, N.; Torre, V.; López, V.; Molina, C.; Fernández, F.; Crespo, D.; Barrena, R.; Komilis, D. Development of phytotoxicity indexes and their correlation with ecotoxicological, stability and physicochemical parameters during passive composting of poultry manure. Waste Manag. 2016, 54, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, G.; Ma, R.; Kong, Y.; Yuan, J. Selection of sensitive seeds for evaluation of compost maturity with the seed germination index. Waste Manag. 2021, 136, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ko, H.; Kim, K.; Kim, H.; Kim, C.; Umeda, M. Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 813–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kong, Y.; Wang, G.; Tang, H.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, G.; Li, Y.; Yuan, J. Multi-omics analysis provides insight into the phytotoxicity of chicken manure and cornstalk on seed germination. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 861, 160611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dell’ Aquila, A. Digital imaging information technology applied to seed germination testing. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 29, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Treatment | Time (d) | −b a | d | t50 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | CK | 5.52 (4.35–6.68) b | 1.00 (0.85–1.15) | 18.40 (16.86–19.94) |
7 | 7.60 (5.92–9.28) * | 0.87 (0.75–0.99) | 18.83 (17.75–19.91) | |
14 | 6.10 (4.63–7.57) | 1.24 (0.89–1.58) | 21.24 (18.81–23.66) | |
21 | 6.35 (4.96–7.74) | 1.02 (0.85–1.18) | 19.37 (17.88–20.86) | |
35 | 6.14 (4.68–7.61) | 0.92 (0.75–1.09) | 19.18 (17.53–20.82) | |
70 | 6.29 (4.93–7.64) | 0.78 (0.68–0.89) * | 17.49 (16.29–18.69) | |
T2 | CK | 5.66 (4.55–6.77) | 1.04 (0.92–1.16) | 17.60 (16.31–18.88) |
7 | 6.60 (4.98–8.23) | 1.08 (0.80–1.36) | 20.98 (18.87–23.08) ** | |
14 | 5.74 (4.47–7.02) | 1.19 (0.94–1.43) | 20.03 (18.02–22.05) * | |
21 | 6.24 (4.60–7.88) | 1.20 (0.77–1.64) | 22.01 (19.05–24.98) ** | |
35 | 6.57 (5.03–8.11) | 0.99 (0.80–1.18) | 19.66 (18.00–21.32) | |
70 | 5.46 (4.01–6.92) | 1.38 (0.75–2.02) | 22.83 (18.72–26.95) * |
Treatment | Time (d) | −b a | d | t50 |
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | CK | 4.18 (3.41–4.96) b | 0.81 (0.74–0.89) | 11.81 (10.81–12.81) |
7 | 5.68 (4.47–6.89) * | 0.60 (0.51–0.68) ** | 14.66 (13.60–15.72) ** | |
14 | 3.73 (2.93–4.52) | 0.72 (0.62–0.81) | 13.07 (11.56–14.57) | |
21 | 3.38 (2.66–4.10) | 0.82 (0.71–0.93) | 13.24 (11.49–15.00) | |
35 | 3.29 (2.60–3.98) | 0.91 (0.79–1.03) | 13.53 (11.68–15.37) | |
70 | 6.29 (2.48–3.79) * | 0.95 (0.82–1.08) | 13.83 (11.80–15.86) | |
T2 | CK | 3.65 (3.06–4.24) | 1.03 (0.98–1.07) | 10.89 (9.93–11.84) |
7 | 4.63 (3.50–5.76) | 0.73 (0.59–0.87) ** | 17.22 (15.27–19.17) ** | |
14 | 4.00 (3.26–4.74) | 0.82 (0.74–0.89) ** | 11.69 (10.64–12.73) | |
21 | 3.70 (3.01–4.38) | 0.84 (0.76–0.92) ** | 11.79 (10.61–12.96) | |
35 | 4.14 (3.41–4.88) | 0.82 (0.75–0.90) ** | 11.36 (10.42–12.29) | |
70 | 3.75 (3.08–4.42) | 0.87 (0.80–0.94) ** | 11.45 (10.38–12.53) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Luo, Y.; Meng, X.; Liu, Y.; Oh, K.; Cheng, H. Using Time-to-Event Model in Seed Germination Test to Evaluate Maturity during Cow Dung Composting. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054201
Luo Y, Meng X, Liu Y, Oh K, Cheng H. Using Time-to-Event Model in Seed Germination Test to Evaluate Maturity during Cow Dung Composting. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054201
Chicago/Turabian StyleLuo, Yuan, Xiangzhuo Meng, Yuan Liu, Kokyo Oh, and Hongyan Cheng. 2023. "Using Time-to-Event Model in Seed Germination Test to Evaluate Maturity during Cow Dung Composting" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054201
APA StyleLuo, Y., Meng, X., Liu, Y., Oh, K., & Cheng, H. (2023). Using Time-to-Event Model in Seed Germination Test to Evaluate Maturity during Cow Dung Composting. Sustainability, 15(5), 4201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054201