Environmental and Community Regeneration: Exploring Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism Based on Visualization Methods
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Tourist Experience Design
2.1. Research Concept
2.2. Study Area of the Design Project
2.3. Design Goals Setting
3. Methods and Materials
3.1. Research Process
Entropy Visualization Method
3.2. Visualization Framework (CUBE)
3.3. Selection of Image Types
Selection of Image Types and Combination
- (1)
- Image types of perception
- (2)
- Combination of passive enjoyment and active enjoyment
3.4. Questionnaire Survey
4. Results
4.1. Reliability of Data
4.2. Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants
4.3. Correlation Analysis of All Variables
4.4. Relationship and Combination of Passive Enjoyment and Active Enjoyment
4.4.1. Correlation and Regression Analysis of Behaviors and Motivation
4.4.2. Definition and Description of the Relationship between AE and PE
4.4.3. Comparing the Combination between AE and PE in Two Village
4.5. Analysis of Experience Emotions
5. Applications and Discussion
5.1. Mapping the Experience
5.2. Application of the Visualization Method in the Design Project
5.3. Dynamic Design Strategy
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hamalainen, T.J.; Heiskala, R. (Eds.) Social Innovations, Institutional Change and Economic Performance; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Mosedale, J.; Voll, F. Social innovations in tourism: Social practices contributing to social development. In Social Entrepreneurship and Tourism; Sheldon, P.J., Daniele, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 101–115. [Google Scholar]
- Bastian, O.; Grunewald, K.; Syrbe, R.-U.; Walz, U.; Wende, W. Landscape services: The concept and its practical relevance. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29, 1463–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Jong, T.M.; Van Der Voordt, D. Ways to Study and Research: Urban, Architectural, and Technical Design; DUP Science: Durham, NC, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Vallés-Planells, M.; Galiana, F.; Van Eetvelde, V. A Classification of Landscape Services to Support Local Landscape Planning. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bastian, O.; Walz, U.; Decker, A. Historical landscape elements: Part of our cultural heritage—A methodological study from Saxony. In The Carpathians: Integrating Nature and Society Towards Sustainability; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; pp. 441–459. [Google Scholar]
- Henry, J.G.; Heinke, G.W.; Burton, I. Environmental Science and Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ahlava, A.; Suominen, J.; Rossi, S. Controlling Risks Through Flexibility and Urban Integration: The Regeneration of Otaniemi Campus in Finland. In Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development in Higher Education; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 21–35. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, A. China’s shift from urban development to rural reconstruction. Archit. Rev. 2018. Available online: https://www.architectural-review.com/essays/chinas-shift-from-urban-development-to-rural-reconstruction (accessed on 28 February 2023).
- Li, L.H.; Lin, J.; Li, X.; Wu, F. Redevelopment of urban village in China—A step towards an effective urban policy? A case study of Liede village in Guangzhou. Habitat Int. 2014, 43, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Culture Trip, Eerie Landscapes: Abandoned Villages in China. 2017. Available online: https://theculturetrip.com/asia/china/articles/eerie-landscapes-7-abandoned-villages-in-china/ (accessed on 23 December 2022).
- Cattaneo, T.; De Lotto, R. Rural-Urban-Architecture: Design Strategies for Small Towns Development; Alinea Editrice: Florence, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Long, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Woods, M.; Zou, J. Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by ‘increasing vs. decreasing balance’land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos, A.C.; Mendes, J.; Valle, P.O.D.; Scott, N. Co-creation of tourist experiences: A literature review. Curr. Issues Tour. 2015, 21, 369–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helkkula, A.; Kelleher, C.; Pihlström, M. Practices and experiences: Challenges and opportunities for value research. J. Serv. Manag. 2012, 23, 554–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trischler, J.; Zehrer, A. Service design: Suggesting a qualitative multistep approach for analyzing and examining theme park experiences. J. Vacat. Mark. 2012, 18, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.; Tussyadiah, I.P.; Zach, F. A Visitor-Focused Assessment of New Product Launch: The Case of Quilt Gardens TourSM in Northern Indiana’s Amish Country. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2010, 27, 723–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tussyadiah, I.P. Toward a Theoretical Foundation for Experience Design in Tourism. J. Travel Res. 2013, 53, 543–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prebensen, N.K.; Xie, J. Efficacy of co-creation and mastering on perceived value and satisfaction in tourists’ consumption. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, Y.G.; Eves, A. Construction and validation of a scale to measure tourist motivation to consume local food. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 1458–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evenson, S.; Dubberly, H. Designing for Service: Creating an Experience Advantage. In Introduction to Service Engineering; Salvendy, G., Karkowski, W., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Walls, A.R.; Okumus, F.; Wang, Y.R.; Kwun DJ, W. An epistemological view of consumer experiences. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Lü, H.; Hu, X. Spatial identification of multifunctional landscapes and associated influencing factors in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Appl. Geogr. 2016, 74, 170–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šťastná, M.; Vaishar, A. Values of rural landscape: The case study Chlum u Třeboně (Bohemia). Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nassauer, J.I.; Opdam, P. Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landsc. Ecol. 2008, 23, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauberg, J. Research by design: A research strategy. Archit. Educ. J. 2011, 5, 46–56. [Google Scholar]
- Roggema, R. Research by Design: Proposition for a Methodological Approach. Urban Sci. 2016, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tveit, M.; Ode, Å.; Fry, G. Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landsc. Res. 2006, 31, 229–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Groot, R.S.; Alkemade, R.; Braat, L.; Hein, L.; Willemen, L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermann, A.; Schleifer, S.; Wrbka, T. The Concept of Ecosystem Services Regarding Landscape Research: A Review. Living Rev. Landsc. Res. 2011, 5, 1–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Naveh, Z. What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2000, 50, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moore, L.F.; Normann, R. Service Management: Strategy and Leadership in Service Businesses; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Cattaneo, T.; Giorgi, E.; Ni, M. Landscape, Architecture and Environmental Regeneration: A Research by Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism in a Rural Village in China. Sustainability 2018, 11, 128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Stamps, A.E., III. Entropy, visual diversity, and preference. J. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 129, 300–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dupont, L.; Ooms, K.; Duchowski, A.T.; Antrop, M.; Van Eetvelde, V. Investigating the visual exploration of the rural-urban gradient using eye-tracking. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2016, 17, 65–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stamps, A.E., III. Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 2004, 24, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cun, X.; Pun, C.-M.; Gao, H. Applying stochastic second-order entropy images to multi-modal image registration. Signal Process. Image Commun. 2018, 65, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shannon, C.E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948, 27, 379–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- de Senneville, B.D.; Zachiu, C.; Ries, M.; Moonen, C. EVolution: An edge-based variational method for non-rigid multi-modal image registration. Phys. Med. Biol. 2016, 61, 7377–7396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, Q.; Jin, Q.; Long, H.; Li, K.; Hu, H.; Wang, X. A more precise multi-modal image registration using self-similarities. In Proceedings of the 2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI), Shanghai, China, 14–16 October 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W.; Watanabe, M.; Ono, K.; Zhou, D. Exploring Visualisation Methodology of Landscape Design on Rural Tourism in China. Buildings 2022, 12, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shostack, L. Designing services that deliver. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1984, 62, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
- Bitner, M.J.; Booms, B.H.; Tetreault, M.S. The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents. J. Mark. 1990, 54, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berry, L.L.; Wall, E.A.; Carbone, L.P. Service Clues and Customer Assessment of the Service Experience: Lessons from Marketing. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2006, 20, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Becker, L.; Jaakkola, E. Customer experience: Fundamental premises and implications for research. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2020, 48, 630–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sociodemographic Characteristics | Number of Subjects | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | <17 | 3 | 3.4% |
18–44 | 73 | 82% | |
45–59 | 9 | 10.1% | |
>60 | 4 | 4.5% | |
Educational background | High school and below | 13 | 14.6% |
Junior college or undergraduate | 71 | 79.8% | |
Graduate student or above | 5 | 5.6% | |
Recreational status Recreational frequency | Once a week or more | 9 | 10.1% |
Once a month or more | 26 | 29.2% | |
Once a half year or more | 28 | 31.5% | |
Once a year or more | 26 | 29.2% | |
Recreational activity (multiplechoice) | Walking | 467 | 13.1% |
Running | 91 | 2.5% | |
Sitting and resting | 514 | 14.4% | |
Photographing | 413 | 11.6% | |
Climbing and scenic view | 129 | 3.6% | |
Drinking tea and chatting | 423 | 11.8% | |
Participating in handicraft activities | 149 | 4.2% | |
Exercise and dance | 98 | 2.7% | |
Playing chess and cards | 166 | 4.6% | |
Reading and listening to songs | 289 | 8.1% | |
Fishing | 118 | 3.3% | |
Scenic view | 386 | 10.8% | |
Drawing and practice | 146 | 4.1% | |
Sing | 86 | 2.4% | |
Camping | 99 | 2.8% |
ANOVA a | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Sum of square | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | F | Significance | |
1 | Regress | 1.249 | 2 | 0.624 | 71.350 | 0.000 b |
Residual | 0.079 | 9 | 0.009 | |||
Total | 1.327 | 11 |
Coefficient a | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | T | Significance | ||
B | Standard error | Beta | ||||
1 | (constant) | −0.811 | 0.533 | −1.522 | 0.162 | |
Behaviors | −0.059 | 0.048 | −0.117 | −1.232 | 0.249 | |
Motivation | 1.193 | 0.110 | 1.025 | 10.818 | 0.000 |
Mean | Standard Deviation | Negative Emotion | Novelty | Excitement | Joy | Scene Evaluation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Negative emotion | 2.420 | 1.113 | 1 | ||||
Novelty | 4.894 | 1.131 | −0.341 ** | 1 | |||
Excitement | 5.177 | 0.961 | −0.391 ** | 0.861 ** | 1 | ||
Joy | 5.497 | 0.830 | −0.449 ** | 0.791 ** | 0.926 ** | 1 | |
Scene evaluation | 5.668 | 0.710 | −0.444 ** | 0.825 ** | 0.887 ** | 0.935 ** | 1 |
Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficient | t | p | R 2 | Adjustment R 2 | F | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | Beta | ||||||
Constant | 1.511 | 0.289 | - | 5.232 | 0.000 ** | 0.895 | 0.888 | F (4,53) =113.511, p = 0.000 |
Joy | 0.675 | 0.104 | 0.789 | 6.502 | 0.000 ** | |||
Excitement | −0.055 | 0.105 | −0.075 | −0.529 | 0.599 | |||
Novelty | 0.160 | 0.055 | 0.255 | 2.919 | 0.005 ** | |||
Negative emotion | −0.020 | 0.032 | −0.032 | −0.642 | 0.523 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, W.; Watanabe, M.; Zhou, D.; Ono, K. Environmental and Community Regeneration: Exploring Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism Based on Visualization Methods. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054540
Wang W, Watanabe M, Zhou D, Ono K. Environmental and Community Regeneration: Exploring Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism Based on Visualization Methods. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054540
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Weijia, Makoto Watanabe, Donghong Zhou, and Kenta Ono. 2023. "Environmental and Community Regeneration: Exploring Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism Based on Visualization Methods" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054540
APA StyleWang, W., Watanabe, M., Zhou, D., & Ono, K. (2023). Environmental and Community Regeneration: Exploring Design Approach for Inclusive Tourism Based on Visualization Methods. Sustainability, 15(5), 4540. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054540