Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Product Design and Customer Preferences
- The variety in personality, value, and range of the products contributed to the heterogeneity of customer preferences;
- When a customer selects a new kind of product, the most preferred product’s chosen qualities are altered;
- Each purchaser has a distinct viewpoint while making a purchase since their emotional condition and available funds may have an impact;
- The attribute a consumer selects while making a purchasing decision typically affects their choice to consider the other attributes.
3. Green Product Attributes and Preferences
3.1. Resources Efficiency
3.2. Weight Reduction
3.3. Using Non-Toxic Material
3.4. Using Recyclable Material
3.5. Using Recycled Material
3.6. Reusable
3.7. Easy to Maintain
3.8. Providing Product Service
3.9. Eco-Label
3.10. Biodegradable Material
3.11. Easy to Upgrade
4. Cultural Value and Green Product
4.1. Collectivism–Individualism
4.2. Masculinity–Femininity
4.3. Uncertainty Avoidance
4.4. Power Distance
4.5. Long- and Short-Term Orientation
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. Population. United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/global-issues/population (accessed on 15 September 2022).
- Sreen, N.; Yadav, R.; Kumar, S.; Gleim, M. The impact of the institutional environment on green consumption in India. J. Consum. Mark. 2020, 38, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ljungberg, L.Y. Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Mater. Des. 2007, 28, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, H.J.; Ahn, M.; Kang, J. The Effects of Knowledge Types on Consumer Decision Making for Non-Toxic Housing Materials and Products. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bloch, P.H. Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. J. Mark. 1995, 59, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thøgersen, J.; Alfinito, S. Goal activation for sustainable consumer choices: A comparative study of Denmark and Brazil. J. Consum. Behav. 2020, 19, 556–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulrich, K.T.; Eppinger, S.D. Product Design and Development, 5th ed.; McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Blijlevens, J.; Creusen, M.E.; Schoormans, J.P. How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes. Int. J. Des. 2009, 3, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Tseng, M. Incorporating probabilistic model of customers’ prefer-ences in concurrent engineering. CIRP Ann. 2008, 57, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasdoǧan, G. The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs. Des. Stud. 1996, 17, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steffen, W. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Brundtland, G.H. World Commission on environment and development. Environ. Policy Law 1985, 14, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beckerman, W. ‘Sustainable Development’: Is it a Useful Concept? Environ. Values 1994, 3, 191–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Leiserowitz, A.A.; Kates, R.W.; Parris, T.M. Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006, 31, 413–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luchs, M.G.; Naylor, R.W.; Irwin, J.R.; Raghunathan, R. The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference. J. Mark. 2010, 74, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masui, K.; Sakao, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Inaba, A. Applying Quality Function Deployment to environmentally conscious design. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2003, 20, 90–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, J.A. Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. J. Bus. Res. 1996, 36, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacDonald, E.; Whitefoot, K.; Allison, J.T.; Papalambros, P.Y.; Gonzalez, R. An Investigation of Sustainability, Preference, and Profitability in Design Optimization. In Proceedings of the International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Montreal, QC, Canada, 15–18 August 2010; pp. 715–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roy, R. Sustainable product-service systems. Futures 2000, 32, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenis, N.D.; van der Lans, I.A.; van Herpen, E.; van Trijp, H.C. Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinodh, S.; Rathod, G. Integration of ECQFD and LCA for sustainable product design. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Moore, P.; Pu, J.-S.; Wong, C.-B. A practical methodology for realizing product service systems for consumer products. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009, 56, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maxwell, D.; van der Vorst, R. Developing sustainable products and services. J. Clean. Prod. 2003, 11, 883–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luttropp, C.; Lagerstedt, J. EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1396–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yu, S.; Qi, B.; Rao, J. ECQFD & LCA based methodology for sustainable product design. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design 1, Yiwu, China, 17–19 November 2010; Volume 2, pp. 1563–1567. [Google Scholar]
- De Coster, R. Bateman, R.J. Sustainable product development strategies: Busi-ness planning and performance implications. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2012, 226, 1665–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; the PRISMA Group. Reprint—Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Phys. Ther. 2009, 89, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Byggeth, S.; Broman, G.; Robèrt, K.-H. A method for sustainable product development based on a modular system of guiding questions. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Pontrandolfo, P. From green product definitions and classifications to the Green Option Matrix. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 1608–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albort-Morant, G.; Henseler, J.; Cepeda-Carrión, G.; Leal-Rodríguez, A.L. Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity as Complementary Drivers of Green Product and Process Innovation Performance. Sustainability 2018, 10, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Awan, U.; Arnold, M.G.; Gölgeci, I. Enhancing green product and process innovation: Towards an integrative framework of knowledge acquisition and environmental investment. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 1283–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, P.M.; Corona, B.; ten Klooster, R.; Worrell, E. Sustainability of reusable packaging–Current situation and trends. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. X 2020, 6, 100037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Choi, T.-M.; Shen, B. Green product development under competition: A study of the fashion apparel industry. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2020, 280, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Essoussi, L.H.; Linton, J.D. New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? J. Consum. Mark. 2010, 27, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, X.H.; Tran, H.L.; Nguyen, Q.H.; Luu, T.P.A.; Dinh, H.L.; Vu, H.T. Factors influencing the consumer’s intention to buy fashion products made by recycled plastic waste. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 3613–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, T.O. Impact of green marketing mix on purchase intention. Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2018, 5, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panda, T.K.; Kumar, A.; Jakhar, S.; Luthra, S.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Kazancoglu, I.; Nayak, S.S. Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers’ altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Oqla, F.M.; Hayajneh, M.T. A hierarchy weighting preferences model to optimise green composite characteristics for better sustainable bio-products. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2021, 14, 1043–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.-J.; Galinato, S.P.; Marsh, T.L.; Tozer, P.R.; Chouinard, H.H. Willingness to Pay for Attributes of Biodegradable Plastic Mulches in the Agricultural Sector. Horttechnology 2020, 30, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshood, T.D.; Nawanir, G.; Mahmud, F.; Mohamad, F.; Ahmad, M.H.; AbdulGhani, A. Biodegradable plastic applications towards sustainability: A recent innovations in the green product. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 6, 100404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issock, P.B.I.; Mpinganjira, M.; Roberts-Lombard, M. Drivers of consumer attention to mandatory energy-efficiency labels affixed to home appliances: An emerging market perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 204, 672–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.; Lee, M.; Lim, S. Do Consumers Care about the Energy Efficiency of Buildings? Understanding Residential Choice Based on Energy Performance Certificates. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xie, X.M.; Huo, J.G.; Zou, H.L. Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 697–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiao, C.; Zhou, G. Willingness to pay a price premium for energy-saving appliances: Role of perceived value and energy efficiency labeling. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Souza, C.; Taghian, M.; Lamb, P. An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corp. Commun. Int. J. 2006, 11, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mungkung, R.; Sorakon, K.; Sitthikitpanya, S.; Gheewala, S.H. Analysis of green product procurement and eco-labels towards sustainable consumption and produc-tion in Thailand. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 28, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murali, K.; Lim, M.K.; Petruzzi, N.C. The Effects of Ecolabels and Environmental Regulation on Green Product Development. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2019, 21, 519–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riskos, K.; Dekoulou, P.; Mylonas, N.; Tsourvakas, G. Ecolabels and the Attitude–Behavior Relationship towards Green Product Purchase: A Multiple Mediation Model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, J.; Chen, A.; Zheng, W.; Zhou, X.; Bai, B.; Wu, J.; Ling, W.; Ma, H.; Wang, W. Effectiveness analysis of resources consumption, environmental impact and production efficiency in traditional manufacturing using new technologies: Case from sand casting. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 209, 112671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trotta, G. Electricity awareness and consumer demand for information. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Lee, J.-S.; Trang, H.L.T. Kim, W. Water conservation and waste reduc-tion management for increasing guest loyalty and green hotel practices. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 75, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, S.; Zhang, H. Technological innovation, environmental regulation, and green total factor efficiency of industrial water resources. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 211, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allwood, J.M.; Ashby, M.F.; Gutowski, T.G.; Worrell, E. Material efficiency: A white paper. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 362–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayyas, A.T.; Omar, M. Eco-Material Selection for Lightweight Vehicle Design. In Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Lighting—A Bet for the Future; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rashid, N.R.N.A. Awareness of Eco-label in Malaysia’s Green Marketing Initiative. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2009, 4, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wandosell, G.; Parra-Meroño, M.; Alcayde, A.; Baños, R. Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.N.L.; Ojo, A.O.; Thurasamy, R. Determinants of green product buying decision among young consumers in Malaysia. Young Consum. 2019, 20, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gungor, A.; Gupta, S.M. Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: A survey. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1999, 36, 811–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, M.; Jain, A. Green Marketing: A Study of Consumer Perception and Preferences in India. Electron. Green J. 2013, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajadurai, J.; Zahari, A.R.; Esa, E.; Bathmanathan, V.; Ishak, N.A.M. Investigat-ing Green Marketing Orientation Practices among Green Small and Medium Enter-prises. J. Asian Finance Econ. Bus. 2021, 8, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tezer, A.; Bodur, H.O. The Greenconsumption Effect: How Using Green Products Improves Consumption Experience. J. Consum. Res. 2020, 47, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuller, D.A.; Ottman, J.A. Moderating unintended pollution: The role of sustainable product design. J. Bus. Res. 2004, 57, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.S.; Saengon, P.; Alganad, A.M.N.; Chongcharoen, D.; Farrukh, M. Consumer green behaviour: An approach towards environmental sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1168–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z. Managing a closed-loop supply chain with take-back legislation and consumer preference for green design. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 282, 124481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajukumar, V.; Gandhi, O. Evaluation of green maintenance initiatives in design and development of mechanical systems using an integrated approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 51, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, C.-H. How to Enhance Green Service and Green Product Innovation Performance? The Roles of Inward and Outward Capabilities. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2017, 25, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Z.; Xie, Y.; Aguilar, F.X. Eco-label credibility and retailer effects on green product purchasing intentions. For. Policy Econ. 2017, 80, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.H.; Murphy, R.J.; Narayan, R.; Davies, G.B.H. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2127–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nedumaran, D.G. Green Marketing on Customer Behaviour Towards Usage of Green Products; SSRN: Rochester, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umeda, Y.; Kondoh, S.; Shimomura, Y.; Tomiyama, T. Development of design methodology for upgradable products based on function–behavior–state modeling. Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. 2005, 19, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gallastegui, I.G. The use of eco-labels: A review of the literature. Eur. Environ. 2002, 12, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bratt, C.; Hallstedt, S.; Robèrt, K.-H.; Broman, G.; Oldmark, J. Assessment of eco-labelling criteria development from a strategic sustainability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1631–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Birch, A.; Hon, K.; Short, T. Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 35, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Zhan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Li, B. Development and analysis of design for environment oriented design parameters. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, M.; Edwards, S.; Massey, R.I. Toxic Chemicals in Toys and Children’s Products: Limitations of Current Responses and Recommendations for Government and Industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7986–7991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braungart, M.; McDonough, W.; Bollinger, A. Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions—A strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1337–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aurich, J.; Fuchs, C.; Wagenknecht, C. Life cycle oriented design of technical Product-Service Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1480–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mont, O.K. Clarifying the concept of product–service system. J. Clean. Prod. 2002, 10, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, C.M.; Niinimäki, K.; Kujala, S.; Karell, E.; Lang, C. Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 97, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shimomura, Y.; Umeda, Y.; Tomiyama, T. A proposal of upgradable design. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, 1–3 February 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umemori, Y.; Kondoh, S.; Umeda, Y.; Shimomura, Y.; Yoshioka, M. Design for upgradable products considering future uncertainty. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, 11–15 December 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huiskonen, J. Maintenance spare parts logistics: Special characteristics and strategic choices. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2001, 71, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markeset, T.; Kumar, U. Design and development of product support and maintenance concepts for industrial systems. J. Qual. Maint. Eng. 2003, 9, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niggeschmidt, S.; Helu, M.; Diaz, N.; Behmann, B.; Lanza, G.; Dornfeld, D. Inte-Grating Green and Sustainability Aspects into Life Cycle Performance Evaluation May 2010. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/825308wk (accessed on 4 January 2021).
- Hauschild, M.Z.; Jeswiet, J.; Alting, L. Design for Environment—Do We Get the Focus Right? CIRP Ann. 2004, 53, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Qin, Z.; Yuan, Q. The Impact of Eco-Label on the Young Chinese Generation: The Mediation Role of Environmental Awareness and Product Attributes in Green Purchase. Sustainability 2019, 11, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Veleva, V.; Ellenbecker, M. Indicators of sustainable production: Framework and methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 2001, 9, 519–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klausner, M.; Grimm, W.M.; Hendrickson, C. Reuse of Electric Motors in Consumer Products. J. Ind. Ecol. 1998, 2, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, W.; Hwang, K.; McDonald, S.; Oates, C.J. Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Cultural constraints in management theories. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 1993, 7, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G.J.; Pedersen, P.B.; Hofstede, G.H. Exploring Culture: Exercises, Sto-ries and Synthetic Cultures; Nicholas Brealey Publishing: Boston, MA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Birukou, A.; Blanzieri, E.; Giorgini, P.; Giunchiglia, F. A Formal Definition of Culture. In Models for Intercultural Collaboration and Negotiation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 1–26. ISBN 978-94-007-5574-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Crilly, N.; Moultrie, J.; Clarkson, P. Seeing things: Consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des. Stud. 2004, 25, 547–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Salmi, A.; Sharafutdinova, E. Culture and design in emerging markets: The case of mobile phones in Russia. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2008, 23, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huff, L.; Kelley, L. Is collectivism a liability? The impact of culture on organizational trust and customer orientation: A seven-nation study. J. Bus. Res. 2002, 58, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frost, D.; Goode, S.; Hart, D. Individualist and collectivist factors affecting online repurchase intentions. Internet Res. 2010, 20, 6–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Han, X.; Hu, G. Optimal production for manufacturers considering consumer environmental awareness and green subsidies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2016, 182, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moon, J.; Chadee, D.; Tikoo, S. Culture, product type, and price influences on consumer purchase intention to buy personalized products online. J. Bus. Res. 2008, 61, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Srite, M. The Influence of National Culture on the Acceptance and Use of Infor-mation Technologies: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the AMCIS 1999, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 13–15 August 1999; Available online: https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis1999/355 (accessed on 15 December 2020).
- Hoe, L.C.; Mansori, S. The Effects of Product Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Evidence from Malaysian Engineering Industry. Int. J. Ind. Mark. 2018, 3, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liao, Y.-K.; Wu, W.-Y.; Pham, T.-T. Examining the moderating effects of green marketing and green psychological benefits on customers’ green attitude, value and purchase intention. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mainieri, T.; Barnett, E.G.; Valdero, T.R.; Unipan, J.B.; Oskamp, S. Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 137, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pickett-Baker, J.; Ozaki, R. Pro-environmental products: Marketing influence on consumer purchase decision. J. Consum. Mark. 2008, 25, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofstede, G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Furrer, O.; Liu, B.S.-C.; Sudharshan, D. The Relationships between Culture and Service Quality Perceptions. J. Serv. Res. 2000, 2, 355–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lihra, T.; Buehlmann, U.; Graf, R. Customer preferences for customized house-hold furniture. J. For. Econ. 2012, 18, 94–112. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.-L.; Tang, J.-F.; Chin, K.-S.; Luo, X.-G.; Pu, Y.; Jiang, Y.-S. On integrating mul-tiple type preferences into competitive analyses of customer requirements in product planning. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 139, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haverila, M. Mobile phone feature preferences, customer satisfaction and repur-chase intent among male users. Australas. Mark. J. AMJ 2011, 19, 238–246. [Google Scholar]
Green Product Attributes | Authors |
---|---|
| [21,22] |
| [3,22,23] |
| [3,24] |
| [3,25] |
| [26,27] |
| [3,25] |
| [21,27] |
| [25,28] |
Country | Number of Document |
---|---|
China | 73 |
India | 30 |
United States | 20 |
Italy | 10 |
Malaysia | 10 |
Canada | 9 |
United Kingdom | 8 |
Brazil | 6 |
France | 6 |
Green Product Attributes | Potential Design Strategies | References |
---|---|---|
Ecolabel | To reduce confusion, use important information and define the eco-principal label’s purpose. | [47,57,73] |
Instead of self-declaration, use an eco-label issued by the government. | [47,74] | |
Customers easily comprehend the symbols used on eco-labels. | [47,57,73] | |
Resources efficiency | Maximize material effectiveness. | [31,75] |
Reduce the amount of waste and emissions generated when using the product. | [3,76] | |
Provide consumers with information, such as an estimate of the resources they will spend during the next month or year (e.g., electricity consumption). | [3,76] | |
Harmless material/non-toxic material | Eliminate hazardous materials to lessen environmental and health impacts. | [77,78] |
Consider substituting inferior materials with more sustainable alternatives. | [77,78] | |
Ensures that non-recyclable components may be discarded in an eco-friendly way. | [77,78] | |
Despite the use of non-toxic materials, the product’s quality and durability must be ensured. | [77,78] | |
If harmful materials are unavoidable, use them only when essential. | [30] | |
Product services | Offer product advice or a brief explanation of the product’s different features and functionalities. | [79,80] |
Provide routine maintenance, upgrades, the availability of spare parts, and quick customer service. | [25,79] | |
Recovery and refurbishment should be utilized during the disposal phase to decrease landfill waste. | [25,79] | |
Offer product leasing as an alternative to product buying so that the manufacturer may pick up the product at the end of the product’s life cycle. | [24,25,79,81] | |
Easily maintained | Simple to replace and disassemble for self-repair and upgrade. | [18,23,72,82] |
Make design by module. | [82,83] | |
The availability of spare parts in the market. | [84,85,86] | |
Reducing size or weight | Minimize material usage and combination | [3] |
Should not affect the qualities. | [87] | |
Utilize high-quality, durable materials to preserve the product’s performance. | [30,31,64] | |
Using recyclable material | Concentrates on optimal recycle ability and high recycled material content. | [3] |
Using biodegradable material | Utilize natural organic material; product waste should be easily biodegradable. | [3,31,88] |
Consider the product’s durability. | [31] | |
If hazardous materials must be utilized, they should be eliminated or minimized as much as feasible. | [89] | |
Using recycled material | Remove the negative effects component of recycled materials. | [36] |
Consider product quality while using recycled materials. | [36] | |
It should not diminish the usefulness of the product. | [36] | |
Easily reused | Used component quality assurance should be designed appropriately. | [90] |
Upgrade easily | Easy to disassemble to access defective components. | [72,82,83] |
Modular design. | [30] | |
Easy disassembly construction | [72,83] |
Approaches | Description |
---|---|
Determining the attributes | Considering the attributes that could influence consumer preferences, such as appearance of product, product function, price, educational, gender, culture, income, and among other things [108,109,110]. |
Evaluating the weigth of attributes | Calculating relative importance of individual characteristics using the most appropriate method (e.g., Statistical analysis, conjoint analysis, QFD, EFA, etc.) [108,109,110]. |
Identifying the preferences rank | The degree and rank of customer preferences on attributes are used to provide design idea to help designers when developing new designs [108,109,110]. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ghazali, I.; Abdul-Rashid, S.H.; Dawal, S.Z.M.; Irianto, I.; Herawan, S.G.; Ho, F.-H.; Abdullah, R.; Abdul Rasib, A.H.; Padzil, N.W.S. Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054542
Ghazali I, Abdul-Rashid SH, Dawal SZM, Irianto I, Herawan SG, Ho F-H, Abdullah R, Abdul Rasib AH, Padzil NWS. Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054542
Chicago/Turabian StyleGhazali, Ihwan, Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, Siti Zawiah Md Dawal, Irianto Irianto, Safarudin Gazali Herawan, Fu-Haw Ho, Rohana Abdullah, Amir Hamzah Abdul Rasib, and Nur Wardah Sufina Padzil. 2023. "Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054542
APA StyleGhazali, I., Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Dawal, S. Z. M., Irianto, I., Herawan, S. G., Ho, F. -H., Abdullah, R., Abdul Rasib, A. H., & Padzil, N. W. S. (2023). Embedding Green Product Attributes Preferences and Cultural Consideration for Product Design Development: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 15(5), 4542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054542