Next Article in Journal
Land Use Changes in the Teles Pires River Basin’s Amazon and Cerrado Biomes, Brazil, 1986–2020
Next Article in Special Issue
From Over-Tourism to Zero Tourism: Opportunities for a New Beginning?
Previous Article in Journal
Mediated Effect of Entrepreneurial Education on Students’ Intention to Engage in Social Entrepreneurial Projects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crisis Management Strategy for Recovery of Small and Medium Hotels after the COVID-19 Pandemic in Thailand
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Benefits and Barriers of Digital Procurement: Lessons from an Airport Company

Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4610; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054610
by Joel R. Motaung 1 and Portia Pearl Siyanda Sifolo 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4610; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054610
Submission received: 9 December 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2023 / Accepted: 21 February 2023 / Published: 4 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Over-Tourism to Zero-Tourism: Opportunities for a New Beginning?)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The reference should be numbered in text  and in brackets []

The manuscript should be written differently in order to be eligible for Sustainability. I suggest to authors to extract from their literature review some ideas that they chose to analyze during interviews and present clearly their new findings compared to the current state of research.

Although well documented and on a promising subject, the article should be written in order to show how it clearly contributes to the literature.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you so much for your contribution to the study

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The writing style in this manuscript is quite good. However, there are some areas where the authors can improve on.

1. Line 43: The authors mentioned ACSA for the first time. The acronym  should be written out in full.

2. Section on Literature Review: After reading the entire section, I found no theory that served as the foundation for this manuscript.The authors need to find some theory to explain the situation of digital procurement. Without any theory to support the stated situation, the paper may be at a high school report level that simply summarizes what many people have known.

3. The methodology is not clear. The authors need to provide more details in the section, such as where and how the number 18 is derived. Also, what method did you employ to extract and interpret data from the interview?

4. Conclusion: The authors need to answer the following questions: "What is your practical and theoretical contribution?" What is the difference between this manuscript and the basic knowledge that many people know?

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thank you so much for the constructive feedback, it has improved the quality of the paper.

Warm regards

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors modified the manuscript as suggested.

Author Response

Corrections are now done. 

Thank you for raising them

Warmest regards

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop