Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- RQ1
- What is the relationship between sustainable design and social sustainability performance?
- RQ2
- What is the relationship between Islamic work ethics and social sustainability performance?
- RQ3
- Does Islamic work ethics moderate the relationship between sustainable design and social sustainability performance?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Natural-Resource-Based View Theory
2.2. Stakeholder Theory
2.3. Social Sustainability Performance
2.4. Sustainable Design
2.5. Previous Study Related to Islamic Contexts
Islamic Work Ethics
2.6. The Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics on Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Samples and Procedure
3.2. Measurement Development
3.3. Statistical Technique
4. Results
4.1. Organisation Profile
4.2. Misssing Values
4.3. Outliers
4.4. Common Method Variance
4.5. Descriptive Analysis
4.6. Measurement Model Assessment
4.7. Structural Model Assessment
Collinearity Assessment
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kim, K.; Lee, S.-M. Does sustainability affect corporate performance and economic development? Evidence from the Asia-Pacific region and North America. Sustainability 2018, 10, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bodhanwala, S.; Bodhanwala, R. Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India. Mgmt. Dec. 2018, 56, 1734–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svensson, G.; Ferro, C.; Hogevold, N.; Padin, C.; Sosa Varela, J.C. Developing a theory of focal company business sustainability efforts in connection with supply chain stakeholders. Int. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2018, 23, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheopuri, A.; Sheopuri, A. Green hr practices in the changing workplace. Bus. Dimens. 2015, 2, 13–26. [Google Scholar]
- Amran, A.; Haniffa, R. Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a developing country. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2011, 20, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mani, V.; Gunasekaran, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Hazen, B.; Dubey, R. Supply chain social sustainability for developing nations: Evidence from India. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 111, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul Aris, N.; Othman, R.; Abdul Rahman, S.; Marzuki, M.M.; Chik, W.; Yusof, W.M. Ethical codes as instruments for cooperative sustainability. Soc. Manag. Res. J. 2016, 13, 30–43. [Google Scholar]
- Wales, T. Organizational sustainability: What is it, and why does it matter. Rev. Enterp. Manag. Stud. 2013, 1, 38–49. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, A.S.; Rehman, K.U.; Bibi, A. Islamic work ethics: How it affects business performance. World Appl. Sci. J. 2011, 12, 312–321. [Google Scholar]
- Widarwati, E.; Wityasminingsih, E.; Zazim, M. Islamic work ethics (IWE): A new management paradigma for improving business performance. In Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Management and Muamalah 2019 (ICoMM 2019), Selangor, Malaysia, 10 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bensaid, B. On Islamic da‘wah and sustainable development. World J. Islam. Hist. Civiliz. 2013, 3, 48–56. [Google Scholar]
- Tufail, U.; Ahmad, M.S.; Ramayah, T.; Jan, F.A.; Shah, I.A. Impact of Islamic work ethics on organisational citizenship behaviours among female academic staff: The mediating role of employee engagement. Appl. Res. Qual. Life. 2017, 12, 693–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, I. Islamic values and environmental disquiet. Philos. Prog. 2017, 57, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hassan, A. Islamic ethical responsibilities for business and sustainable development. Humanomics 2016, 32, 80–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan, A.; Mata, M.N.; Albinsson, P.A.; Martins, J.M.; Hassan, R.B.; Mata, P.N. Alignment of Islamic banking sustainability indicators with sustainable development goals: Policy recommendations for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, A.; Halim, F.W. The influence of work ethic and counterproductive work behaviour of civil servants. J. Technol. Manag. Bus. 2017, 3, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Mdolo, M.P.; Naghavi, N.; Fah, B.C.Y.; Jin, T.C. Corporate sustainability adoption amongst public listed companies in Malaysia. Turk. Online J. Des. Art Commun. 2018, 8, 509–517. [Google Scholar]
- Aida, A.A.A.A.; Maslin, M.; Nik Hasnaa, N.M. The moderating effect of Islamic work ethics on the relationship between knowledge management capabilities and organizational performance at the private higher education institutions in Oman. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2016, 94, 397–407. [Google Scholar]
- Kareem, O.; Azmin, A.A.; Tunku Salha, T.A. Does Islamic work ethics strengthen the size of knowledge management and entrepreneurial orientation effects on performance of smes in Nigeria? Int. J. Soc. Sci. Econ. Res. 2018, 3, 41–64. [Google Scholar]
- Rokhman, W. The effect of Islamic work ethics on work outcomes. Elect. J. Bus. Ethics Organ. Stud. 2010, 15, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
- Wahab, M.A.; Quazi, A.; Blackman, D. Measuring and validating Islamic work value constructs: An empirical exploration using Malaysian samples. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 4194–4204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Che Rose, R. Examining the link between Islamic work ethic and innovation capability. J. Manag. Dev. 2010, 29, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.S. Work ethics: An Islamic prospective. J. Human Sci. 2011, 8, 850–859. [Google Scholar]
- Bubicz, M.E.; Barbosa-Póvoa, A.P.F.D.; Carvalho, A. Social sustainability management in the apparel supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y.-J.; Choi, T.-M. A United Nations’ sustainable development goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management. Transp. Res. E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 141, 102010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Statistics Malaysia. The Source of Malaysia‘s Official Statistics. 2018. Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=home/index&menu_id=b2ROaWpITmQ5NnAvMHVmRjRkZzlBQT09 (accessed on 10 November 2022).
- Obamen, J.; Omonona, S.; Oni, O.; Ohunyeye, O. Effect of environmental management practices and sustainability on some selected manufacturing firms in South East Nigeria. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) Directory of Malaysian Industries, 48th ed.; FMM: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hutt, O.E.; Hornung, C.; Brzozowski, M.; York, M.; Walter, J.; Polyzos, A.; Tsanaktsidis, J.; King, S.; Savage, G.P.; Simpson, G. Sustainable Chemical Manufacture and Economic Prosperity Flowing as One. 2016. Available online: https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/pub?pid=csiro:EP166347 (accessed on 10 November 2022).
- Lozano, F.J.; Freire, P.; Guillén-Gozalbez, G.; Jiménez-Gonzalez, C.; Sakao, T.; Mac Dowell, N.; Ortiz, M.G.; Trianni, A.; Carpenter, A.; Viveros, T. New perspectives for sustainable resource and energy use, management and transformation: Approaches from green and sustainable chemistry and engineering. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 30, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ganasen, S.; Velaichamy, V. Innovations in green chemistry towards sustainable development. OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 9, 11–1432. [Google Scholar]
- Hart, S.L. A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1995, 20, 986–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hart, S.L.; Dowell, G. Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1464–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ong, T.S.; Lee, A.S.; Teh, B.H.; Magsi, H.B. Environmental innovation, environmental performance and financial performance:Evidence from Malaysian environmental proactive firms. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brockett, A.; Rezaee, Z. Corporate Sustainability: Integrating Performance and Reporting, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Nemetz, A.M. A global investigation of government and community stakeholder influences on large company engagement in sustainability. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Sci. 2015, 10, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Miles, S. Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 108, 285–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grafé-Buckens, A.; Hinton, A.F. Engaging the stakeholders: Corporate views and current trends. Bus. Strategy Environ. 1998, 7, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, A.O.; Hunton-Clarke, L. A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2003, 12, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aragón-Correa, J.A.; Sharma, S. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2003, 28, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. A systematic review on social sustainability of artificial intelligence in product design. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Missimer, M.; Mesquita, P.L. Social sustainability in business organizations: A research agenda. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aktin, T.; Gergin, Z. Mathematical modelling of sustainable procurement strategies: Three case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 113, 767–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jan, A.; Marimuthu, M.; Mohd, M.P. The nexus of sustainability practices and financial performance: From the perspective of Islamic banking. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Environment Program. Sustainable Design. 2018. Available online: http://www.unep.org/resourceefficiency/Society/CommunicationandEducation/tabid/55550/Default.aspx (accessed on 10 November 2022).
- Diabat, A.; Khodaverdi, R.; Olfat, T. An exploration of green supply chain practices and performances in an automotive industry. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 68, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchand, A.; Walker, S. Product development and responsible consumption: Designing alternatives for sustainable lifestyles. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1163–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maletic, M.; Maletic, D.; Dahlgaard, J.J.; Dahlgaard-Park, S.M.; Gomišček, B. Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: From a literature review towards a conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 79, 182–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rashid, N.; Jabar, J.; Yahya, S.; Samer, S. State of the art of sustainable development: An empirical evidence from firm’s resource and capabilities of Malaysian automotive industry. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Majerova, J. Analysis of Slovak consumer’s perception of the green marketing activities. Procedia Econom. Bus. Adm. 2015, 26, 553–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chan, E.S. Managing green marketing: Hong Kong hotel managers’ perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 34, 442–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakar, N.A.; Rosbi, S. Monotonic correlation diagnostics of share price volatility for shariah-compliant Islamic bank: A new insight of Islamic financial engineering. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Bus. Adm. 2017, 3, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
- Bakar, N.A.; Rosbi, S.; Uzaki, K. Cryptocurrency framework diagnostics from Islamic finance perspective: A new insight of bitcoin system transaction. Int. J. Manag. Sci. Bus. Adm. 2017, 4, 19–28. [Google Scholar]
- Bara, D.I.B. The Ethics of Lecturers Based on Islamic Perspective in Al-Washliyah Universities. J. Innov. Econ. Dev. 2017, 3, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sarkawi, A.A.; Abdullah, A.; Dali, B. The concept of sustainability from the Islamic perspectives. Int. J. Econ. Bus. Law 2016, 9, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
- Jalil, M.A.; Azam, F.; Rahman, M.K. Implementation mechanism of ethics in business organizations. Int. Bus. Res. 2010, 3, 45–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A.J.; Weir, D. Islamic Perspectives on Management and Organization, 1st ed.; Taylor & Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Yesil, S.; Sekkeli, Z.H.; Dogan, O. An investigation into the implications of Islamic work ethic (IWE) in the workplace. J. Econ. Behav. Stud. 2012, 4, 612–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Husin, W.N.W. Work ethics from the Islamic perspective in Malaysia. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 2012, 29, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, A.S.; Rehman, K.U.; Abbasi, S.H. Islamic work ethics: How they affect shareholder value. Sci. Int. 2012, 24, 521–530. [Google Scholar]
- Abbasi, A.S.; Mir, G.M.; Hussain, M. Islamic work ethics: How it affects organizational learning, innovation and performance. Actual Probl. Econ. 2012, 12, 471–480. [Google Scholar]
- Yunus, O.M.; Rahim, A.R.A.; Shabuddin, A.B.; Mazlan, M. In work ethic of Malaysian civil servants. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic (2nd ICBER 2011), Langkawi, Malaysia, 14 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Berrone, P.; Surroca, J.; Tribó, J.A. Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance: A test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction. J. Bus. Ethics 2007, 76, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Certo, S.C. Modern Management: Quality, Ethics, and the Global Environment, 5th ed.; Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Marina, A.; Wahjono, S.I. Business ethics for business sustainability in Muhammadiyah hospital: Evidence from Ponorogo, Indonesia. J. Ina. Eco. Bus. 2017, 32, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Al Mamun, A.; Ibrahim, M.D.; Yusoff, M.N.H.; Fazal, S.A. Entrepreneurial leadership, performance, and sustainability of micro-enterprises in Malaysia. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bashirun, S.N.; Rahman, A.H.A.; Razali, M.M.; Lagiman, N. Employee green behaviour (egb) at work: The moderating effects of Islamic values. J. Tuah 2020, 1, 128–135. [Google Scholar]
- Hanafi, A.G.; Ahmad, H.H. The Effects of Islamic Business Ethics on Family Business in Malaysia. Int. J. Manage. Sci. Inf. Tech. Account. 2021. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358741680_THE_EFFECTS_OF_ISLAMIC_BUSINESS_ETHICS_ON_FAMILY_BUSINESS_IN_MALAYSIA (accessed on 10 November 2022).
- Abugu, J.O.; Nwankwo, C.A.; Musa, A. Pro-environmental behaviour impact on firms’ performance and social sustainability. Contemp. Mark. Res. J. 2022, 9, 18–28. [Google Scholar]
- Chappel, C.; Tucker, M.E. Hinduism and Ecology: The Intersection of Earth, Water and Sky, 4th ed.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Foltz, R.C.; Denny, F.M.; Baharuddin, A. Islam and Ecology: A bestowed Trust, 1st ed.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Hessel, D.T.; Ruether, R.R. Christianity and Ecology: Seeking the Well-Being of Earth and Humans, 1st ed.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, D.R.; Tucker, M.E. Buddhism and Ecology: The Interconnection of Dharma and Deeds (Religions of the World and Ecology), 1st ed.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Mohamad, Z.F.; Idris, N.; Baharuddin, A.; Muhammad, A.; Sulaiman, N.M.N. The role of religious community in recycling: Empirical insights from Malaysia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 58, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Bezares, A.M.; Gómez-Bezares, F. Catholic social thought and sustainability. Ethical and economic alignment. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2020, 14, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vavik, T.; Keitsch, M.M. Exploring relationships between universal design and social sustainable development: Some methodological aspects to the debate on the sciences of sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 5, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryman, A. Research Methods and Organization Studies, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, 5th ed.; Pearson Education: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Bush, R.P.; Ortinau, D.J. Marketing Research: Within a Changing Information Environment, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Zikmund, W.G.; Babin, B.J.; Carr, J.C.; Griffin, M. Business Research Methods, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Dillman, D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007 Update with New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Ta, G.C.; Meng, C.K.; Mokhtar, M.; Ern, L.K.; Alam, L.; Sultan, M.M.A.; Ali, N.L. Enhancing the regulatory framework for upstream chemicals management in Malaysia: Some proposals from an academic perspective. J. Chem. Health. Saf. 2016, 23, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappelleri, J.C.; Darlington, R.B.; Trochim, W.M. Power analysis of cutoff-based randomized clinical trials. Eval. Rev. 1994, 18, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Hopkins, L.; Kuppelwieser, V.G. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2014, 26, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuan, C.L. Sample size estimation using Krejcie and Morgan and Cohen statistical power analysis: A comparison. Penyelidikan 2006, 7, 78–86. [Google Scholar]
- Adarsha, K.; Prathap, R. Green supply chain management practices: A case study from Indian manufacturing industry. Asia Pac. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2013, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Esty, D.C.; Winston, A. Green to Gold: How Smart Companies Use Environmental Strategy to Innovate, Create Value, and Build Competitive Advantage, 1st ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Krajnc, D.; Glavič, P. Indicators of sustainable production. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2003, 5, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Lai, K. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 111, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, W.S.; Chen, Y. Corporate sustainable development: Testing a new scale based on the mainland Chinese context. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 105, 519–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, A. Scaling an Islamic work ethic. J Soc. Psychol. 1988, 128, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousef, D.A. Islamic work ethic–A moderator between organizational commitment and job satisfaction in a cross-cultural context. Pers. Rev. 2001, 30, 152–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabachnick, B.G.; Fidell, L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics, 6th ed.; Pearson Education: Boston, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Manage. 1986, 12, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfahani, M.D.; Shahbazi, H.; Nilashi, M. Moderating effects of demographics on green information system adoption. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2018, 16, 1950008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maghsoudi, A.; Zailani, S.; Ramayah, T.; Pazirandeh, A. Coordination of efforts in disaster relief supply chains: The moderating role of resource scarcity and redundancy. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2018, 21, 407–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988, 16, 74–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed.; Sage Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Amin, M.; Thurasamy, R.; Aldakhil, A.M.; Kaswuri, A.H.B. The effect of market orientation as a mediating variable in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and SMEs performance. Nankai Bus. Rev. Int. 2016, 7, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, W.; Mayberry, R.; Bae, S.; Singh, K.; He, Q.P.; Lillard, J.W., Jr. A study of effects of multicollinearity in the multivariable analysis. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2014, 9, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson College Div: Andover, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ramayah, T.; Cheah, J.; Chuah, F.; Ting, H.; Memon, M.A. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using smartPLS 3.0: An Updated Guide and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed.; Pearson: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Makhloufi, L.; Meirun, T.; Belaid, F.; Yaacob, N.A. Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource-based view perspective. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2022, 31, 425–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamali, A.; Bhutto, A.; Khaskhely, M.; Sethar, W. Impact of leadership styles on faculty performance: Moderating role of organizational culture in higher education. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2022, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawson, J.F. Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. J. Bus. Psychol. 2014, 29, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, A.; Lenox, M. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manage. Sci. 2002, 48, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kjaerheim, G. Cleaner production and sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zailani, S.; Govindan, K.; Iranmanesh, M.; Shaharudin, M.R.; Chong, Y.S. Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: The Malaysian case. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 108, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schoenherr, T. The role of environmental management in sustainable business development: A multi-country investigation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Tang, O.; Feldmann, A. Applying GRI reports for the investigation of environmental management practices and company performance in Sweden, China and India. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 98, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthans, F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 2002, 23, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Krishna, A.; Dangayach, G.; Jainabc, R. Business ethics: A sustainability approach. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 25, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rafiki, A.; Wahab, K.A. Influences of Islamic practices on small firm performance: A study in North Sumatera, Indonesia. Islam. Bus. Manag. J. 2013, 5, 64–82. [Google Scholar]
- Adam, S.B. The role of Islamic work ethics on the relationship between board of directors and performance of Islamic financial institutions in Nigeria: A proposed framework. Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov. Appl. 2019, 3, 206–211. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, K.E.; Mokhtar, M.; Goh, C.T.; Hanafiah, M.M. A conceptual framework for the adoption and implementation of product stewardship in the chemical industries. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2015, 30, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suki, N.M. Moderating role of gender in the relationship between hotel service quality dimensions and tourist satisfaction. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tourism 2014, 15, 44–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Koliby, I.S.; Mohd Suki, N.; Abdullah, H.H. Linking knowledge acquisition, knowledge dissemination, and manufacturing SMEs’ sustainable performance: The mediating role of knowledge application. J. Innov. Knowl. 2022, 5, 185–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hadith |
---|
“Help your brother whether he is the oppressor or the oppressed. If he is an oppressor, prevent him from doing it, for that will be helping him, and if he is oppressed he should be helped (against the oppressor)”. “Your employees are your brethren over whom Allah (S.W.T) has given you authority. So if one of you has his brother under his control, you should feed him with the like of what you eat and clothe him with the like of what you wear. You should not overburden him with the like of what you eat and clothe him with the like what you wear. You should not overburden him with what he cannot bear, and if you do so, help him in his job”. |
“Every Muslim must pay sadaqah (charity)”. A companion asked, “What about someone who has nothing to give?” The Prophet replied, “Then let him do something with his two hands and benefit himself. That will be charity.” A companion asked, “But what if he cannot do that?” The Prophet replied, “Then he can help someone who is needy”. They asked, “What if he cannot do even that?” The Prophet replied, “Then he should enjoin the doing of good”. Still again they asked, “But what if he cannot do that?” The Prophet replied, “Then he should refrain from evil, for that is a form of charity”. |
Variable | Number of Items | Source(s) | Likert Scale |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainable Design | 10 | Adarsha & Prathap [87]; Esty & Winston [88]; Krajnc & Glavic [89]; Zhu et al. [90] | 1–5 |
Social Sustainability Performance | 6 | Chow & Chen [91] | 1–5 |
Islamic Work Ethics | 17 | Ali [92]; Yousef [93] | 1–5 |
Total | 33 |
Variables | Measurement Items | Mean | 5% Trimmed Mean |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainable Design (SD) | SD1 | 3.385 | 3.406 |
SD2 | 3.508 | 3.551 | |
SD3 | 3.469 | 3.509 | |
SD4 | 3.769 | 3.842 | |
SD5 | 3.585 | 3.650 | |
SD6 | 4.077 | 4.154 | |
SD7 | 3.608 | 3.645 | |
SD8 | 3.539 | 3.568 | |
SD9 | 3.515 | 3.543 | |
SD10 | 3.546 | 3.586 | |
Islamic Work Ethics (IWE) | IWE1 | 4.423 | 4.350 |
IWE2 | 4.361 | 4.521 | |
IWE3 | 4.423 | 4.521 | |
IWE4 | 4.300 | 4.470 | |
IWE5 | 4.123 | 4.521 | |
IWE6 | 4.331 | 4.402 | |
IWE7 | 4.332 | 4.350 | |
IWE8 | 3.777 | 3.940 | |
IWE9 | 3.562 | 3.970 | |
IWE10 | 4.246 | 4.128 | |
IWE11 | 3.708 | 3.987 | |
IWE12 | 4.139 | 4.205 | |
IWE13 | 3.900 | 4.410 | |
IWE14 | 4.146 | 4.402 | |
IWE15 | 3.915 | 3.842 | |
IWE16 | 4.085 | 3.611 | |
IWE17 | 3.931 | 4.308 | |
Social Sustainability Performance (SOP) | SOP1 | 4.207 | 3.748 |
SOP2 | 3.884 | 4.188 | |
SOP3 | 3.869 | 3.940 | |
SOP4 | 3.953 | 4.197 | |
SOP5 | 3.738 | 3.782 | |
SOP6 | 3.692 | 3.727 |
Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings | ||
---|---|---|
Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % |
29.904 | 36.029 | 36.029 |
Label | Statements | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|
Sustainable Design | |||
SD1 | “The company designs products that reduce consumption of materials”. | 3.385 | 0.910 |
SD2 | “The company designs products that reduce consumption of energy”. | 3.508 | 0.958 |
SD3 | “The company designs products that reuse, recycle, and recover materials and component parts”. | 3.469 | 0.974 |
SD4 | “The company designs products that avoid or reduce the use of hazardous products in the manufacturing process”. | 3.769 | 1.008 |
SD5 | “The company cooperates with consumers for eco-design”. | 3.585 | 1.105 |
SD6 | “The company designs products that meet environmental regulations and safety standards”. | 4.077 | 0.912 |
SD7 | “The company designs products that have the least weight and capacity that reduces the time consumption”. | 3.608 | 0.936 |
SD8 | “The company designs products that have the least capacity for the area stores”. | 3.539 | 0.925 |
SD9 | “The company designs products that require the least energy for the transportation process”. | 3.515 | 0.085 |
SD10 | “The company designs products that are easy to set up for users in the most energy-saving way”. | 3.546 | 0.933 |
Average Score | 3.701 | 0.808 | |
Social Sustainability Performance | |||
SOP1 | “The company improved health and safety for employees or community”. | 4.207 | 0.784 |
SOP2 | “The company recognised and acted on the need to fund local community initiatives”. | 3.884 | 0.886 |
SOP3 | “The company protected claims and rights of aboriginal people or local community”. | 3.869 | 0.820 |
SOP4 | “The company showed concern for the visual aspects of the organisation’s facilities and operations”. | 3.953 | 0.766 |
SOP5 | “The company communicated the organisational environmental impacts and risks to the general public”. | 3.738 | 0.911 |
SOP6 | “The company considered the interests of stakeholders in investment decisions by creating a formal dialogue”. | 3.692 | 0.833 |
Average Score | 3.891 | 0.647 | |
Islamic Work Ethics | |||
IWE1 | “The company agrees that laziness at the workplace should be avoided”. | 4.423 | 0.825 |
IWE2 | “The company agrees that employees need to be dedicated towards work”. | 4.361 | 0.898 |
IWE3 | “The company agrees that good work benefits both company and employees”. | 4.423 | 0.796 |
IWE4 | “The company agrees that justice and generosity at the workplace are necessary for the employees”. | 4.300 | 0.868 |
IWE5 | “The company believes that employees who produce more than enough to meet company’s needs contribute to the prosperity of society as a whole”. | 4.123 | 0.907 |
IWE6 | “The company encourages employees to carry out the work to the best of their ability”. | 4.123 | 0.801 |
IWE7 | “The company believes that employees foster personal growth and social relations”. | 4.331 | 0.741 |
IWE8 | “The company believes that employees’ life has no meaning without work”. | 3.777 | 0.893 |
IWE9 | “The company believes that more leisure time is not good for society”. | 3.777 | 0.983 |
IWE10 | “The company emphasises and encourages human relations in the organisation”. | 4.246 | 0.737 |
IWE11 | “The company believes that employees who work are able to control their environment and accomplishment”. | 3.708 | 0.919 |
IWE12 | “The company prioritises creative work as a source of happiness and accomplishment”. | 4.139 | 0.785 |
IWE13 | “The company believes that employees who work well are more likely to get ahead in life”. | 3.900 | 0.806 |
IWE14 | “The company believes that work gives employees the chance to be independent”. | 4.146 | 0.769 |
IWE15 | “The company stresses on the importance of employees to meet deadlines at work for success”. | 3.915 | 0.940 |
IWE16 | “The company encourages employees to constantly work hard to meet responsibilities”. | 4.085 | 0.845 |
IWE17 | “The company believes that work is derived from intention and results, rather than just results”. | 3.931 | 0.864 |
Average Score | 4.062 | 0.602 |
Constructs | Items | Loading | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sustainable Design (SD) | SD1 | 0.771 | 0.945 | 0.631 |
SD2 | 0.813 | |||
SD3 | 0.727 | |||
SD4 | 0.799 | |||
SD5 | 0.835 | |||
SD6 | 0.717 | |||
SD7 | 0.820 | |||
SD8 | 0.796 | |||
SD9 | 0.851 | |||
SD10 | 0.800 | |||
Social Sustainability Performance (SOP) | SOP1 | Deleted | 0.902 | 0.648 |
SOP2 | 0.804 | |||
SOP3 | 0.825 | |||
SOP4 | 0.797 | |||
SOP5 | 0.850 | |||
SOP6 | 0.745 | |||
Islamic Work Ethics (IWE) | IWE1 | 0.864 | 0.953 | 0.716 |
IWE2 | 0.855 | |||
IWE3 | 0.826 | |||
IWE4 | 0.870 | |||
IWE5 | 0.848 | |||
IWE6 | 0.862 | |||
IWE7 | 0.885 | |||
IWE8 | Deleted | |||
IWE9 | Deleted | |||
IWE10 | 0.754 | |||
IWE11 | Deleted | |||
IWE12 | Deleted | |||
IWE13 | Deleted | |||
IWE14 | Deleted | |||
IWE15 | Deleted | |||
IWE16 | Deleted | |||
IWE17 | Deleted |
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 0.424 | ||
| 0.355 | 0.611 |
Latent Variables | VIF |
---|---|
Sustainable Design (SD) | 1.319 |
Islamic Work Ethics (IWE) | 1.493 |
Relationships | Std. Beta | Std. Error | t-Value | Decision | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | Sustainable Design → Social Sustainable Performance | 0.296 * | 0.097 | 3.04 | Supported |
H2 | Islamic work ethics → Social Sustainable Performance | 0.526 * | 0.074 | 7.13 | Supported |
Relationship | Std. Beta | Std. Error | t-Value | R2 Included | R2 Excluded | f2 | Effect Size | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H3 | Sustainable Design → Social Sustainable Performance | 0.111 * | 0.059 | 1.891 | 0.399 | 0.341 | 0.046 | Small |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Asha’ari, M.J.; Daud, S.; Suki, N.M. Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075991
Asha’ari MJ, Daud S, Suki NM. Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. Sustainability. 2023; 15(7):5991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075991
Chicago/Turabian StyleAsha’ari, Maryam Jamilah, Salina Daud, and Norazah Mohd Suki. 2023. "Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics" Sustainability 15, no. 7: 5991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075991
APA StyleAsha’ari, M. J., Daud, S., & Suki, N. M. (2023). Linking Sustainable Design and Social Sustainability Performance of Chemical Manufacturing Firms: Moderating Role of Islamic Work Ethics. Sustainability, 15(7), 5991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075991