Next Article in Journal
Corporate Governance Research in Asian Countries: A Bibliometric and Content Analysis (2001–2021)
Previous Article in Journal
The Evolution of University Students’ Financial Attitudes and Their Role in the Sustainability of Personal Finances
Previous Article in Special Issue
Foreign Direct Investment and Carbon Emission Efficiency: The Role of Direct and Indirect Channels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates Treated by Means of Wastewater and Carbonation Pretreatment

by
Yury Villagrán-Zaccardi
1,2,*,
Lotte Broodcoorens
1,
Philip Van den Heede
1 and
Nele De Belie
1,*
1
Magnel-Vandepitte Laboratory, Department of Structural Engineering and Building Materials, Ghent University, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium
2
Sustainable Materials, Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), 2400 Mol, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6386; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086386
Submission received: 1 February 2023 / Revised: 24 March 2023 / Accepted: 5 April 2023 / Published: 7 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Carbon Technologies and Sustainability)

Abstract

:
Fine recycled concrete aggregate (FRCA) possesses substantial limitations for its use due to its significant porosity. Extensive research on the effect of carbonation on the accessible porosity of coarse recycled concrete aggregate is available in the literature, but FRCA information is scarce. The present paper presents results of the effect of carbonation on different fractions of FRCA from <0.125 mm to 4 mm previously sprayed with wastewater from mortar production as an additional source of portlandite. The results of water absorption via the electrical conductivity method, TGA, XRD+Rietveld+PONKCS analysis, EDS mapping, and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) demonstrate that the efficiency of the treatment depends on the particle size range of the FRCA. It was most effective for the extreme size fractions <0.25 mm and >1 mm of FRCA as a result of the relationship between the amount of precipitated calcium carbonate and the initially accessible porosity in each fraction. As a consequence, mortar produced with 30% replacement of natural sand with carbonated FRCA showed no impact on compressive strength.

1. Introduction

The recycling of concrete waste from construction and demolition is becoming more and more urgent as virgin aggregate scarcity is increasing. Most current applications only consider coarse fractions (particle size >2–4 mm) for high-end valorization such as in recycled aggregate concrete [1,2]. By recycling the coarse fraction of recycled aggregate, a significant negative impact on the environment can be mitigated [3,4], which in turn results in less consumption of natural resources. The coarse fraction is typically economically viable as it requires little to no adaptation for the production of new fresh concrete. Fine recycled concrete aggregate (FRCA), which concentrates the majority of the hardened paste, is typically downcycled and used in low-value applications [5].
It is necessary to circumvent the challenges associated with the valorization of FRCA by employing innovative valorization technologies to convert waste concrete into secondary high-value raw materials and complete the recycling process [4,5,6,7]. To enhance the properties of FRCA, the inconvenient adhered cement paste of particles [8,9] may be densified by means of carbonation [6]. This technique has been applied mostly to the coarse fraction [10,11,12], and studies on FRCA are scarce so far. Differences in particle size can be an important factor in terms of the efficiency of carbonation treatments. As carbonation proceeds, the outer layer of aggregate particles becomes denser, and the reaction rate slows down. According to [13], the relative humidity during the carbonation process plays an important role in the formation of this outer rim. With a relative humidity near saturation during the reaction, moisture accumulates at the surfaces of aggregate particles with liquid running-off and carrying dissolved ions (i.e., leaching of calcium). Porosity increases as the precipitation of carbonates does not occur within the pore structure of the hardened cement paste. For lower relative humidities, moisture forming during the carbonation reaction finds sufficient time to evaporate, and calcium accumulates near the surface where carbonation occurs. This results in a more efficient densification of the outer surfaces of particles [13]. The effect of outer carbonation is exacerbated when carbonating aggregates with lower surface areas [14]. Therefore, a different efficiency of the process can be expected for FRCA than for coarse RCA.
Upon carbonation, the microstructure of the FRCA would be densified as a result of the precipitation of calcium carbonate while the process is occurring [15]. Such CO2-enhancement techniques produce carbonation products that can cover not only the micropores of the attached mortar but also microcracks in recycled aggregates, potentially improving the aggregate performance. Both the new interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between the old and new mortar and the old ITZ between the old mortar and original aggregate are enhanced through CO2 treatment [16]. At the same time, CO2 is being removed from the atmosphere, i.e., the FRCA has the potential to serve as a carbon sink during this carbon utilization strategy.
High-tech carbonation methods have been proposed earlier in the literature [17], but such methods require significant investment and processing, which can reduce the competitiveness of the treated FRCA significantly. For example, provision of Ca+-rich wastewater has been shown to be effective in treating coarse RCA for reduced water absorption [18,19]. A similar approach for fine fractions seems possible, but consideration to differences in size and composition should be given.
Because aggregate should remain a low-cost component of concrete mixes, it appears critical for potential upscaling that the treatment’s complexity is kept to a minimum and feasible in the field. In the context of concrete production plants, the use of wastewater and ambient pressure reaction chambers appear simple to implement.
Taking into account previous approaches in the literature, this current study investigated the feasibility of achieving significant improvements in accelerated carbonation using only minimally complicated technology. Furthermore, the variation in composition of FRCA with particle size and its impact on the efficiency of the carbonation treatment has not yet been addressed in the literature. In the present study, different size fractions of FRCA were subjected to an eco-efficient method of accelerated carbonation. Moreover, FRCA is frequently stored for long periods and suffers extensive natural carbonation. For this reason, in the present study, additional contribution of carbonatable material was pursued. FRCA was previously sprayed with wastewater from the production of mortar as an additional source of portlandite for further carbonation in an ambient pressure chamber. The findings revealed evidence of a limited relationship between the level of enhancement and the amount of precipitated calcium carbonate in the FRCA.

2. Materials and Methods

An industrial FRCA (Van Pelt Bouwmaterialen, Schoten, Belgium) was used (Figure 1). The sum of crushed concrete, mortar and unbound natural aggregate in it was >90%. The FRCA, with the particle size distribution as shown in Figure 2, was sieved into fractions <0.125 mm (F1), 0.125–0.25 mm (F2), 0.25–0.5 mm (F3), 0.5–1 mm (F4), 1–2 mm (F5) and 2–4 mm (F6) with the purpose of determining the variable efficiency of the proposed treatment on each fraction. Additionally, a CEN sand was used as reference material. The properties tested before and after carbonation included porosity by water absorption, analysis of SEM/BSE+EDS images, and composition by loss on ignition as well as TGA and XRD+Rietveld+PONKCS analysis [20].
The electrical conductivity method (performed as explained in [21]) was preferred over the NBN EN 1097-6 method [22] as the latter tends to overestimate water absorption with respect to the electrical conductivity method. Figure 3 exemplifies this, showing the collapse of the cone only occurring after over drying and for an undersaturated state according to the inflection point in conductivity of the skeleton (left branch in Figure 3) as also indicated in [21]. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed in a Jeol JSM-7600F Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope, FESEM, with an in-lens Schottky electron source and elemental analysis with energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). Samples were oven-dried at 40 °C and impregnated with epoxy in a vacuum chamber for a minimum of 2 h to remove most air in accessible pores and hence allow better infiltration of the resin. After hardening for 24 h, samples were polished with progressively finer abrasives (320–500–1200 grade SiC papers) followed by polishing with 3 and 1 µm diamond paste. Samples were afterwards carbon-coated with a 20 nm layer. SEM images were acquired at 250× magnification with a working distance of 8 mm, 15 keV. Energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) allowed us to make chemical mappings from the samples.
Loss on ignition was determined on duplicates for each sample. For each measurement, around (1 ± 0.1) g of sample, manually ground with mortar and pestle to <0.125 μm, was placed in pre-ignited crucibles and calcined at 950 °C for 2 h. The weight loss respective to the initial dry weight was computed as loss on ignition. Complementarily, thermogravimetric analysis was performed under a protective atmosphere of nitrogen in a NETZSCH STA 449F3 STA449F3A-0384-M device. Due to the features of the device, each measurement was performed on only 50 mg of sample, and for improved representativeness in terms of relative composition of cement paste and sand, the results were scaled to match those of the total loss on ignition resulting from larger samples. The recorded mass loss relative to the total weight was differentiated to obtain the derivative thermogravimetry (DTG).
For XRD measurements, powder samples (samples ground to <125 μm) were laterally loaded in the sample holders to mitigate the preferred orientation effects for XRD data collection. Only fractions F1, F3, and F6 were tested for XRD. A Thermo Scientific ARL X’tra diffractometer with a Peltier-cooled detector in BraggBrentano geometry was used for data collection with 30 mA and 40 kV tube operating conditions and a Cu X-ray source. Data were collected with a 0.02 2θ step size, from 5–70°, with a time per step of 1 s. The phase identification and Rietveld quantitative phase analysis were performed using the TOPAS Academic V6 software package.
The FRCA was almost fully naturally carbonated while stored in the plant. An additional source of portlandite was necessary for the treatment. Prior to carbonation, the FRCA fractions were pretreated by spraying them with wastewater (total solids = 0.23 wt.%, pH = 12.06) from mortar production. The sprayed amount was such that all particles were wet but not soaked (water/solid mass ratios ranged from 0.134 for F1 to 0.075 for F6). The content of calcium in the wastewater corresponded to that of an oversaturated limewater with additional content of solids. The average value determined by acid titration of the unfiltered solution was 1.5 g Ca2+/L solution. Considering this contribution, and the amounts of solution sprayed on the samples, the content of calcium incorporated into the samples was estimated at 0.203 (F1) to 0.113 (F6) g Ca2+/kg per sample. Once sprayed, the samples remained to dry in the laboratory environment for 24 h. Following this, they were placed in the carbonation chamber (20 °C, 60% RH, and 1% CO2) for a period of 2 weeks for full carbonation.
The untreated and treated FRCAs were also used in mortar mixes. Three mixes were made: one control mix with 100% siliceous sand as fine aggregates (NAC), one with 30 wt.% of the sand replaced by untreated FRCA (RAC), and one with 30 wt.% of treated FRCA (CRAC). The density of the aggregates was 2.65, 2.36, and 2.37 for the natural sand, FRCA, and carbonated FRCA, respectively. The whole size fraction was used for this replacement. For approaching realistic situations, the particle size distribution of the CEN sand was not mimicked, i.e., its volume was partially replaced with the FRCA with its own particle size distribution. For the RAC and CRAC mixes, compensation water was added to prevent water uptake from the mix by the dry FRCA, computed as 70% of the full water absorption capacity of the FRCA [23]. The mix compositions are presented in Table 1. The 28-day compressive strength and the water absorption under vacuum were tested on mortar mixes.
Finally, the potential of each mortar to contribute to global warming was estimated using the LCA software SimaPro (v. 8.5.2.0). The goal was to compare the environmental impacts of NAC and CRAC mortars. Because the effect of carbonation on recycled aggregates is the primary focus of this study, the equivalent CO2 emissions were deemed the most important indicator to address. The functional unit was defined as a 1 kg mortar that met the same requirements in terms of workability, strength, and durability for all the mortar mixes. The NAC and CRAC mixes showed the same 28-day compressive strength (see values in the Results Section) and workability (with compensation water foreseen for CRAC based on the water absorption of the CFRCA). Regarding durability, it is assumed, based on the compressive strength values, that performance is comparable for both mortars exposed in similar non- or low-aggressive conditions [24]. Final values might be rescaled to address potential different lifespans for each mortar but in the present study these were considered the same. Therefore, no rescaling was applied to the studied mortar mixes. A modified cradle-to-gate approach was followed. It was assumed that the sand was extracted in a quarry and transported to the concrete mixing plant from there. An integrated recycling plant was considered within the mortar production plant. Therefore, the construction and demolition waste was assumed to be transported from the demolition site to the production plant. The LCA regarded mortar mixing as the final stage. After all, for comparison purposes between NAC and CRAC, the transportation to the construction site after production would be the same considering the same unit weight. The different products and locations that were considered are presented in Figure 4. Values for emissions and energy use of the different materials and processes were found in the literature, and the CML-IA baseline impact method was chosen.
The database Ecoinvent 3, cut-off by classification, was used [25]. The primary production of materials was allocated to the primary user of the material. Hence, the effect of recycling was not attributed to this primary user. As a result, the recycled material bears no environmental burden from the primary material but only the impact of the recycling process itself. Moreover, unit processes were used. These contain links to other unit processes from which the inventory flows could be calculated with SimaPro. The approach has the potential to be used for detailed interpretation and uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo [26]. The effect of allocating (part of) the demolition to the construction and demolition waste was examined, with assignation rates of 0%, 50%, and 100% to the FRCA. The distance over which the construction and demolition waste had to be transported to the recycling plant was also investigated as the environmental impact of the recycling procedure is highly reliant on the transportation of the construction and demolition waste [27]. Therefore, three scenarios were considered: no transport, transport from Ghent (Belgium) to Schoten (Belgium), and transport from Ostend (Belgium) to Schoten (Belgium).
Details for the life cycle inventory and additional analyses for indicators other than global warming potential are provided as Supplementary Material.

3. Results

3.1. Properties of FRCA

The water absorption was the highest for F1 (34.27%) and F2 (25.44%) and decreased with increasing fraction size, as seen in Figure 5. The XRD+Rietveld analysis (Table 2) shows significant amounts of amorphous phases in the samples (F1: 30.8%, F3: 13.3%, and F6: 18.5%). This amorphous phase is mostly associated with the presence of C-S-H (although small amounts of slag or fly ash might also be contributing).
The loss on ignition (Figure 6) is consistent with the XRD+Rietveld in terms of C-S-H plus calcium carbonate. Fractions were largely carbonated before treatment, and only for F6 was a very small core containing portlandite found (Table 2: 1.2 wt.% for XRD, Figure 6: small peak at 450 °C for TGA), thus proving the necessity of the wastewater pretreatment. The nonexistent-to-very-limited amount of portlandite found in the treated samples allowed us to compute the derived amount of calcium carbonate stoichiometrically from the full reaction of the added portlandite with CO2, leading to formation of between 0.506 (F1) to 0.283 (F6) g CaCO3/kg of sample. This is indeed a relatively small amount, which is consistent with the results of loss on ignition (Figure 6) and DTG curves (Figure 7), but with a very effective effect considering that the method of spraying distributes the contribution at a surface level to obturate the external pore system, resulting in the reductions presented in Figure 5. The image analysis allowed us to identify the most porous regions in the FRCA. Figure 8 shows the adhered cement paste depicted according to zones with the simultaneous presence of Si, Al, Ca, and Fe and the phases of natural aggregates depicted by zones with either only Ca or Si and a low porosity. The adhered cement paste contributed to reducing the angularity of particles. In Figure 8, it is also clear that a thin outer layer of calcium (red) indicates the formation of a layer with preferential precipitation of calcium carbonate as a result of the method used by spraying the outer surface with wastewater.

3.2. Mortar Mixes

The results of mortar mixes are presented in Table 3. The use of 30% untreated FRCA reduced the compressive strength of the mortar, whereas the carbonation process with wastewater pretreatment allowed us to reduce the water absorption in spite of the limited contribution of solids from the wastewater and maintain the compressive strength at the same level of the control mortar with natural sand. The treatment was not equally efficient to reduce the water absorption of the mortar (water absorption for CRAC was reduced with respect to RAC but still larger than NAC).

3.3. Global Warming Potential

Figure 9 shows the results of global warming potential of the mortar mixes (in kg CO2 eq). Different scenarios were considered: no transport to the recycling plant (Schoten, Belgium) and no allocation of demolition impacts to the FRCA (NP, ND), transport to Ghent (TG, 80 km) or Ostend (TO, 130 km), 50% allocation (50% D), and 100% allocation (100% D) of the demolition of the parent material. Scenarios with and without considering CO2 uptake during the additional carbonation were studied. For all the different scenarios, the CRAC mix had the lowest global warming potential. The contribution of the FRCA was even negative when considering the CO2 uptake, indicating a positive influence on the environment. Additional details on the computations for the global warming potential are presented as Supplementary Material (also including other environmental indicators).

4. Discussion

Water absorption capacity varies depending on the size range of the aggregate. Such variation can be attributed to differences in composition for each fraction. The high content of C-S-H in fraction F1 explains its high value for water absorption. Notably, the ratio between the amount of C-S-H and water absorption is much higher for F6 than for F3. This might be also due to the different quality of the cement paste in the different fractions. It seems logical that the cement paste in coarser fractions that survived the crushing process had a higher strength and lower porosity than the paste that was ground into the finest fractions and did not remain adhered to the natural aggregate particles. The contribution of the cement paste to the overall water absorption capacity might then be different depending on the quality of the corresponding paste, explaining the dissimilar correlation between the paste content and the water absorption for the different fractions.
Considering the water absorption, the treatment seems most effective for fractions F3 and F6 and least effective for fractions F1 and F4. Considering the loss on ignition, the treatment seems most effective for fractions F1, F4, and F6. An effective precipitation of calcium carbonate does not directly translate into a certain improvement degree of microstructure as this also depends on the initial pore size distribution. Hence, as the finest fraction includes the weakest cement paste with a large porosity and carbonatable phases, the large precipitation of calcium carbonate still seems insufficient to clog a large part of the pores, leading to a lesser relative reduction in water absorption. Therefore, the efficiency of the carbonation treatment depends on each particle size range.
The significant specific surface of FRCA makes it highly carbonatable when under atmospheric exposure. Carbonation treatments require the presence of carbonatable phases in the material. This seems more difficult to have in the field for FRCA compared to coarse RCA. Therefore, the strategy of carbonating FRCA to improve their properties will require (most of the time) the introduction of a carbonatable phase, as was the focus of this research in which we used wastewater from mortar preparation. Even then, the amount of precipitated carbonate might not be sufficient if the porosity of the FRCA is very high. It seems necessary to advance with additional studies at higher CO2 concentrations that might force higher carbonation degrees of additional phases, especially C-S-H, which even counteract the effect of other carbonatable products.

5. Conclusions

The treatment consisting of spraying wastewater and 1% CO2 carbonation improved the characteristics of FRCA. Overall, the water absorption of FRCA was reduced by 1.5 percent points. Furthermore, the carbonation treatment prevented any impact on the strength level of mortar containing 30% carbonated FRCA as natural sand replacement. A main advantage of the approach is that it requires only minimally complicated technology, allowing it to prevent downcycling by applying it to low specific value constituents such as aggregates. A greater amount of precipitated calcium carbonate does not always imply a higher improvement in characteristics. Such lack of correlation could be explained by the quality of the cement paste included in the various size fractions. As a result, the beneficiation should take the porosity of each FRCA/fraction to be treated into account. The treatment strategy revealed not only technical feasibility in terms of its positive impact on mortar compressive strength, but also an environmental benefit in terms of CO2 utilization.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su15086386/s1. Supporting information on the computations for the global warming potential and other environmental indicators can be found as an annex.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.V.-Z. and N.D.B.; methodology, Y.V.-Z., L.B. and P.V.d.H.; formal analysis, L.B. and Y.V.-Z.; investigation, L.B., Y.V.-Z. and P.V.d.H.; resources, Y.V.-Z. and N.D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.V.-Z. and L.B.; writing—review and editing, P.V.d.H. and N.D.B.; visualization, L.B.; supervision, Y.V.-Z. and N.D.B.; project administration, Y.V.-Z. and N.D.B.; funding acquisition, Y.V.-Z. and N.D.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The results in this paper were facilitated by funding received from the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO, G062720N). As a former MSCA-SoE Fellow, Y.A. Villagran-Zaccardi also appreciates the financial support received from the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO, 12ZZD21N).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available upon request to the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support received from Natalia Alderete and Sandra De Buck during the execution of experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. BS EN 12620; Aggregates for Concrete. British Standard Institute: London, UK, 2013.
  2. NBN EN 206; Concrete—Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. NBN: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
  3. Van den Heede, P.; De Belie, N. Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rodríguez-Robles, D.; Van den Heede, P.; De Belie, N. Life cycle assessment applied to recycled aggregate concrete. In New Trends in Eco-Efficient and Recycled Concrete; De Brito, J., Agrela, F., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 207–256. [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Maria, A.; Eyckmans, J.; Van Acker, K. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. Waste Manag. 2018, 75, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Chong, L.; Xie, Z. Performance enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate—A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Villagrán-Zaccardi, Y.A.; Marsh, A.T.M.; Sosa, M.E.; Zega, C.J.; De Belie, N.; Bernal, S.A. Complete re-utilization of waste concretes–Valorisation pathways and research needs. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 177, 105955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Belin, P.; Habert, G.; Thiery, M.; Roussel, N. Cement paste content and water absorption of recycled concrete coarse aggregates. Mater. Struct. 2014, 47, 1451–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, Y.; Hanif, A.; Usman, M.; Park, W. Influence of bonded mortar of recycled concrete aggregates on interfacial characteristics –Porosity assessment based on pore segmentation from backscattered electron image analysis. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 212, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xuan, D.; Zhan, B.; Poon, C.S. Assessment of mechanical properties of concrete incorporating carbonated recycled concrete aggregates. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 65, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ouyang, K.; Liu, J.H.; Liu, S.H.; Song, B.X.; Guo, H.; Li, G.S.; Shi, C.J. Influence of pre-treatment methods for recycled concrete aggregate on the performance of recycled concrete: A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 188, 106717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, C.H.; Xiao, J.Z.; Zhang, G.Z.; Li, L. Interfacial properties of modeled recycled aggregate concrete modified by carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 105, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gholizadeh-Vayghan, A.; Bellinkx, A.; Snellings, R.; Vandoren, B.; Quaghebeur, M. The effects of carbonation conditions on the physical and microstructural properties of recycled concrete coarse aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 257, 119486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tam, V.W.Y.; Butera, A.; Le, K.N. Carbon-conditioned recycled aggregate in concrete production. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 133, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, J.; Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Pan, X.; Poon, C.S.; Xie, Z. Performance Enhancement of Recycled Concrete Aggregates through Carbonation. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 2015, 27, 04015029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaliyavaradhan, S.K.; Ling, T.-C. Potential of CO2 sequestration through construction and demolition (C&D) waste—An overview. J. CO2 Util. 2017, 20, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, S.H.; Shen, P.L.; Xuan, D.X.; Li, L.; Sojobi, A.; Zhan, B.J.; Poon, C.S. A comparison of liquid-solid and gas-solid accelerated carbonation for enhancement of recycled concrete aggregate. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 118, 103988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fang, X.; Zhan, B.; Poon, C.S. Enhancement of recycled aggregates and concrete by combined treatment of spraying Ca2+ rich wastewater and flow-through carbonation. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 277, 122202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, X.L.; Zhan, B.J.; Poon, C.S. Enhancing the accelerated carbonation of recycled concrete aggregates by using reclaimed wastewater from concrete batching plants. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 239, 117810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Scarlett, N.V.Y.; Madsen, I.C. Quantification of phases with partial or no known crystal structures. Powder Diffr. 2006, 21, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sosa, M.E.; Carrizo, L.E.; Zega, C.J.; Villagrán Zaccardi, Y.A. Water absorption of fine recycled aggregates: Effective determination by a method based on electrical conductivity. Mater. Struct. 2018, 51, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. BS EN 1097-6; Tests for Mechanical and Physical Properties of Aggregates. Determination of Particle Density and Water Absorption. British Standard Institute: London, UK, 2013.
  23. Leite, M.B.; Figueire do Filho, J.G.L.; Lima, P.R.L. Workability study of concretes made with recycled mortar aggregate. Mater. Struct. 2013, 46, 1765–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marinkovic, S.; Melesev, M.; Ignjatovic, I. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete made using recycled concrete or natural aggregates. In Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2014; pp. 239–266. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wernet, G.; Bauer, C.; Steubing, B.; Reinhard, J.; Moreno-Ruiz, E.; Weidema, B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): Overview and methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2016, 21, 1218–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.R.; Luo, W.; Wang, J.J.; Wang, Y.F.; Xu, Y.Q.; Xiao, J.Z. A review of life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 209, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borghi, G.; Pantini, S.; Rigamonti, L. Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) management in Lombardy Region (Italy). J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 184, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fine recycled concrete aggregates: (A) F1, (B) F2, (C) F3, (D) F4, (E) F5, and (F) F6.
Figure 1. Fine recycled concrete aggregates: (A) F1, (B) F2, (C) F3, (D) F4, (E) F5, and (F) F6.
Sustainability 15 06386 g001
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of FRCA in comparison with CEN Standard sand.
Figure 2. Particle size distribution of FRCA in comparison with CEN Standard sand.
Sustainability 15 06386 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of the water absorption methods: NBN EN 1097-6 vs. electrical conductivity method (example for treated F2).
Figure 3. Comparison of the water absorption methods: NBN EN 1097-6 vs. electrical conductivity method (example for treated F2).
Sustainability 15 06386 g003
Figure 4. Cradle-to-gate approach.
Figure 4. Cradle-to-gate approach.
Sustainability 15 06386 g004
Figure 5. Water absorption of the fine RCAs before and after carbonation according to the electrical conductivity method (wt.%).
Figure 5. Water absorption of the fine RCAs before and after carbonation according to the electrical conductivity method (wt.%).
Sustainability 15 06386 g005
Figure 6. Loss on ignition of the fine RCAs before and after carbonation [wt.%].
Figure 6. Loss on ignition of the fine RCAs before and after carbonation [wt.%].
Sustainability 15 06386 g006
Figure 7. DTG curves of uncarbonated and carbonated (treated) fractions F1, F3, and F6.
Figure 7. DTG curves of uncarbonated and carbonated (treated) fractions F1, F3, and F6.
Sustainability 15 06386 g007
Figure 8. EDS image (Fe = yellow, S = magenta, Al = cyan, Si = green, and Ca = red): F3 (left) and F4 (right).
Figure 8. EDS image (Fe = yellow, S = magenta, Al = cyan, Si = green, and Ca = red): F3 (left) and F4 (right).
Sustainability 15 06386 g008
Figure 9. Global warming potential (kg CO2 eq). NT: no transport accounted; ND: no demolition accounted; 50% D: 50% of FRCA production (demolition) accounted; 100% D: 100% of FRCA production (demolition) accounted; TG: transport to Ghent accounted; TO: transport to Ostend accounted; and (no) CO2 uptake: with(out) consideration of carbonation of FRCA.
Figure 9. Global warming potential (kg CO2 eq). NT: no transport accounted; ND: no demolition accounted; 50% D: 50% of FRCA production (demolition) accounted; 100% D: 100% of FRCA production (demolition) accounted; TG: transport to Ghent accounted; TO: transport to Ostend accounted; and (no) CO2 uptake: with(out) consideration of carbonation of FRCA.
Sustainability 15 06386 g009
Table 1. Mortar mix compositions per batch.
Table 1. Mortar mix compositions per batch.
NACRACCRAC
CEM I [g]453453453
Mixing water [g]227227227
Sand [g]1360952952
Fine RCAs [g]-408408
Compensation water [g]-4945
Table 2. Different phases in fractions F1, F3, and F6 according to XRD+Rietveld.
Table 2. Different phases in fractions F1, F3, and F6 according to XRD+Rietveld.
PhaseF1 [%]F3 [%]F6 [%]
Gypsum2.70.62.1
Calcite19.47.116.7
Dolomite3.30.34.5
Quartz25.558.540.8
Portlandite0.20.11.2
Muscovite1.62.31.8
Albite low4.77.25.6
Orthoclase8.66.84.7
Kaolinite0.50.00.7
Illite2.73.63.4
Mullite1.71.12.0
Other30.813.318.5
Table 3. 28-day compressive strength and water absorption.
Table 3. 28-day compressive strength and water absorption.
NACRACCRAC
28-day compressive strength [N/mm2]64.04 +/−1.8254.33 +/−1.2865.35 +/−1.46
Water absorption [%]8.21 +/−0.1411.74 +/−0.1710.19 +/−0.11
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Villagrán-Zaccardi, Y.; Broodcoorens, L.; Van den Heede, P.; De Belie, N. Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates Treated by Means of Wastewater and Carbonation Pretreatment. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086386

AMA Style

Villagrán-Zaccardi Y, Broodcoorens L, Van den Heede P, De Belie N. Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates Treated by Means of Wastewater and Carbonation Pretreatment. Sustainability. 2023; 15(8):6386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villagrán-Zaccardi, Yury, Lotte Broodcoorens, Philip Van den Heede, and Nele De Belie. 2023. "Fine Recycled Concrete Aggregates Treated by Means of Wastewater and Carbonation Pretreatment" Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop