Next Article in Journal
The Role of the Total-Quality-Management (TQM) Drivers in Overcoming the Challenges of Implementing TQM in Industrialized-Building-System (IBS) Projects in Malaysia: Experts’ Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Road Pothole Detection: A Crowdsourcing Based Multi-Sensors Fusion Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary

by
Hossein Mousazadeh
1,
Amir Ghorbani
2,
Hossein Azadi
3,
Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani
4,
Hasan Mosazadeh
5,
Kai Zhu
6,* and
Lóránt Dénes Dávid
7,8,*
1
Department of Regional Science, Faculty of Science, Eötvös Loránd University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Tourism, Faculty of Geographical Sciences and Planning, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 81746-73441, Iran
3
Department of Economics and Rural Development, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
4
Department of Tourism Management, Budapest Business School, University of Applied Sciences, 1149 Budapest, Hungary
5
Department of Psychology, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland
6
Faculty of Resources and Environmental Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
7
Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, 6000 Kecskemet, Hungary
8
Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 2100 Godollo, Hungary
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6608; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086608
Submission received: 4 March 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 12 April 2023 / Published: 13 April 2023

Abstract

:
Limited research has investigated the impact of immigrants’ sense of place (SOP) attitudes on their quality of life (QOL) outcomes, especially during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study aimed to fill this gap by examining the effect of SOP attitudes and health-related QOL (HQOL) on 120 Iranian citizens residing in Budapest, Hungary, during the pandemic. Using social media platforms, an online survey was conducted between March and July 2020. The findings of this study revealed that SOP elements, such as connection to sites, location identification, and location reliance, are susceptible to change and rely on QOL during the pandemic. The study also highlighted that Budapest has the potential to become a desirable destination for future immigrants. Overall, this study contributes to the literature on the relationship between SOP attitudes and QOL outcomes among immigrants during a crisis. It provides valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners to improve the SOP and QOL of immigrants living in cities affected by pandemics or other crises. This study provides insights into the influence of a sense of place on the quality of life of Iranian immigrants by presenting a model and highlighting significant results in a selected community.

1. Introduction

Cities are diverse environments populated by people with different interests who should be motivated to work together to create a balanced atmosphere and sufficient QOL [1,2]. QOL is one of the basic prerequisites for development and the most important field of study in different countries, which, due to its increasing importance, is an effective tool in managing and planning development issues and urban and regional studies [3]. Quality of life linked to well-being (HQOL) has received worldwide attention in recent years, and several multidimensional classifications of health status have been increasingly used to describe and assess HQOL [4]. Recently, many studies have highlighted that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected people’s health, HQOL, well-being, and mental health (for example, [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]). In December 2019, the novel COVID-19 pandemic started as a major threat to China and spread far and wide in other countries [11,12,13]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported the novel COVID-19 pandemic as a global pandemic on 11 March 2020, with over 32 million infected people and more than 988,496 casualties across 216 countries [14]. Thus far, the crisis has become the most devastating challenge in recent history [15,16]. Furthermore, it taught us that this challenge could not be managed individually at the national level [17,18]. The COVID-19 pandemic has included people from multiple socioeconomic groups, poor and rich, in low-, middle-, and high-income countries alike [19,20], and has impacted personal lives, the economy, scientific communication, and the environment [21]. The coronavirus pandemic may cause a substantial epidemiological and healthcare burden in Hungary [22]. On 3 March 2020, the first recorded case of COVID-19 in Hungary was confirmed [23]. The cumulative number of confirmed persons afflicted with COVID-19 cases in Hungary until 9 November 2020 was 1,147,788 cases (Hungarian governmental center for coronavirus, 2020). On 11 March 2020, Hungary announced a ‘State of Threat,’ a special form of a legal regime [24], as an initial reaction to the emerging COVID-19 pandemic. Hungary used mitigation strategies, such as encouraging social distancing and staying home, to decrease the transmission rate [23]. COVID-19 has spread widely and rapidly with substantial effects on the QOL of people [7,25,26], and the quarantine resulting from it has destroyed our SOP [27]. It means we can no longer go to the places that describe our daily life and create a sense of our identity. The COVID-19 pandemic has directly affected the SOP attitudes, QOL, and well-being outcomes of Iranian residents in Budapest [5].
In the recent decade, a developing amount of research has shown that SOP attitudes are correlated with QOL outcomes (e.g., [28,29,30,31,32]), environmental and natural factors such as urban rivers and parks (e.g., [5,33,34,35,36]), inhabitants in rural and metropolitan areas (e.g., [37,38,39,40,41,42]), and wellness and psychological research (e.g., [29,43,44,45,46]).
A major gap is clarified by the lack of experimental studies on the relationships among Iranian residents with characteristics of well-being and HQOL performance. This discrepancy is experienced in the perception of SOP attitudes as avenues of health-related assistance to address the needs of the migrant population for autonomy, identity development, dependency, and social inclusion [47]. SOP is one of the vital concepts in promoting the QOL of citizens in an urban area [40]. This concept finally leads to the creation of high QOL and quality of the environment because of its essential role in initiating interactions among citizens and the urban environment [48]. Field research has shown that many Iranians are interested in Budapest and its attractions, especially in education. Furthermore, they are interested in traveling to Budapest. Much less analytical analysis was undertaken to highlight the aspects of SOP attitudes in relation to QOL outcomes in critical conditions, such as the coronavirus crisis in Europe, particularly among migrant populations, such as Iranian residents. In this study, we examine the impacts of SOP attitudes and HQOL in a sample of Iranian migrants in Budapest (Hungary) during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Our study shows that SOP attitudes based on SOP theory, the positive characteristics, and the atmosphere of the location are important in describing people–environment interactions that are related to HQOL. The aim of this research was to examine the effect of SOP attitudes and health-related quality of life (HQOL) on Iranian citizens residing in Budapest, Hungary, during the pandemic. To achieve this aim, the article has been structured as follows: a review of research literature in the field of sense of place and quality of life, identification of research methods, data collection through questionnaires, use of appropriate models and software for data analysis, discussion, conclusions, and finally, the design of the research model has been formed.

2. Related Background

2.1. Defining the SOP

SOP is a social metric capturing the relative importance of various entities in special locations [33]. History and theoretical background show that SOP consists of three key dimensions: place identity, place attachment, and place dependence related to a specific geographical setting [49,50]. SOP attitudes are closely related to residents’ willingness to participate, the social growth aspirations of residents, happiness, passion for neighborhood development, and support for public facility development [51,52,53]. Place definitions include an ability to put deep intelligence into the relationships that people have rather than ‘SOP’ with a place, or place attachment, alone [54,55]. Knowing SOP as a general mentality toward a geographical environment seems to affect understanding and a feeling of inclusiveness [56]. Based on Jorgensen and Stedman [49], the multidimensional SOP approach encourages a deeper definition of place in coping with the dynamics involved, along with changes in venue and mobility. The definition of SOP can be separated into three places according to the nature of the attitude: feelings (attachment), values (identity), and behavioral responsibilities (dependence) (e.g., [47,49,50,57,58,59]). We suggest that SOP is an abstruse affective bond between citizens and the urban environment as part of their QOL and conclude that the research techniques used in this paper offer an outstanding method for analyzing urban environments with such a relevant phenomenon.

2.2. Place Attachment

Place attachment is the strength of the expectations of a person about the relation between himself or herself and the place. To gain their help and participation, the ideals, attitudes, and meanings that urban dwellers assign to positions within the city should be studied, recognized, valued, and maintained [60,61,62,63]. The QOL of individuals depends on the environment [64]. Place attachment is often covered using psychometric measures distinguishing among various attitudes, place identification, and place dependency, for example [65]. Place attachment and SOP are practically synonymous in some places and research activities [65], concentrating on the relation of a person to a place and residential satisfaction [66]. Attachment is used as the conceptual framework system of attachment behavior and attachment experiences of individuals in relation to emotion regulation and QOL outcomes [43,67,68,69].
Place attachment stresses the optimistic and substantive features of interpersonal interaction to satisfy the fundamental needs of individuals and enhance well-being [70]. Moreover, it helps individuals, when negotiating the individual’s QOL, to maintain and enhance optimistic feelings that minimize emotional pain and anxiety [71,72]. Different disciplinary lenses have explored the relations between location, practice, experience, and management, often from the viewpoint of place attachment [35,73,74,75,76]. The explanation of attachment ties is based on the understanding of where hypothetical attachment objects are located, such as spatial environments, for their attachment fulfillment [46,77,78]. When people are in critical situations or special circumstances, it can affect their attachment, such as the conditions examined in this study, and it shows that the coronavirus pandemic has affected people’s SOP.

2.3. Place Identity

Place identity describes the emotional connection of a person to a place and refers to a deep symbolic attachment [79]. Place identity may be articulated as the relational equivalence of location dependency. Instead of assessing the reliance on a location to keep an operation or life for its wealth, place identification depends on the place to establish one’s self-identity [80,81]. Place identity is an important predictor of destination loyalty [82,83]. Stobbelaar and Pedroli [84] declared that their theory of ‘personal–existential’ landscape identity recalled the construction of place identity that was established specifically in the field of environmental psychology with regard to the relations between identity and place identity. Place identity is defined as a collection of memories, conceptions, interpretations, and emotions connected to a particular physical environment. Jorgensen and Stedman [49,50] characterized place identity as a cognitive reaction or approach to a place and a sort of self-identification with a place. Urban dwellers will describe the SOP in terms of belonging to a specific place (in this study, Iranians who immigrated to Budapest and interacted with the city). Place identity can be seen as a part of self-identity in this context [47,85]. Local [86], regional [87], and national [88] levels have varied the scope of the SOP in place identity analysis. The current research, in comparison, focuses on the transnational geographical level, primarily on Iranians living outside their own region.

2.4. Place Dependence

Place dependency is a key functional connection that indicates how specific tasks are assisted by the place [74,89]. This dimension is defined by the connections between a physical setting and the activities that take place within it. Place dependence can be viewed as an antecedent variable for place identity. Vaske and Kobrin [90] verified that place dependence has a positive effect on place identity. Jorgensen and Stedman [49] conceptualized this aspect as the “perceived behavioral advantage” of a position as opposed to other places (p. 238). A highly reliant individual would attribute considerable significance to the availability of a particular condition on a site compared to other sites [65]. People are likely to have experienced place dependence before a place identity is formed; they are attracted to a location based on events, services, or contacts in the community that make up the environment in which they are involved [30].

2.5. Sense of Place, Quality of Life and COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly and extensively spread, significantly impacting people’s sense of place and quality of life [25,26,91]. The pandemic has affected individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds in both low and high-income countries, impacting personal lives and the environment [19,20,91]. According to Mousazadeh [91], the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent quarantine measures have caused fear and prevented people from visiting their preferred locations, significantly impacting their quality of life and sense of place. Bissell [92] emphasized that gaining insight into the evolving significance and interpretation of place during the COVID-19 pandemic can aid in comprehending the altered connections and situations. Research has demonstrated that individuals under home quarantine reported heightened anxiety levels and a decline in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and those with greater anxiety tended to have lower HRQoL levels. Therefore, prioritizing individuals’ mental health during pandemics or other emergency situations is crucial [93]. Consequently, when implementing initiatives to enhance the quality of life (QOL) of individuals after COVID-19, it is essential to consider the most affected QOL domains and the associated factors [94].

2.6. Place-Sense and Quality of Life

SOP is a social base for personality, dependency, and connection of the position that intercedes with physical features and circumstances [95,96]. Several studies have connected SOP attitudes to QOL outcomes and have shown the relationship between them well (e.g., [43,45,78,97,98]). The rate of SOP attitudes is positively correlated with all HQOL outcomes, according to Counted [30]. In the experience of position connection, Tartaglia [41] associated the consistency of social interactions with essential contextual artifacts as an indispensable part of developing QOL in a community. This outcome is supported by Gattino et al. [99], who recommended that QOL is mainly motivated by one’s sense of culture. Moreover, studies show that socio-demographic factors have an impact on SOP among migrants [100]. Eight hypotheses on the connections between and impacts of SOP results on QOL outcomes among Iranian citizens in Hungary were tested by the conceptual model for the study’s purposes. The hypothesis was set according to the model at this stage. Each of the exogenous variables (SOP) will influence the endogenous variables, as shown in the model (Figure 1) (QOL). Any of them is then known as a hypothesis:
  • Place identity has a significant effect on SOP;
  • The position connection has a significant influence on the SOP;
  • Position reliance has a significant influence on the SOP;
  • The environment has a significant effect on QOL;
  • Physical health has a significant effect on QOL;
  • Social relationships have a significant effect on QOL;
  • General QOL has a significant effect on QOL;
  • Psychological health has a significant effect on QOL.

3. Materials and Method

3.1. Study Area

Hungary has seven regions, among which Budapest is the most populous and immigrant-friendly county [5]. Budapest is the capital of Hungary and is located between 47.613437° and 47.349269° northern latitude and 18.926381° and 19.334538° eastern longitude in central Hungary. The altitude of the city ranges from approximately 95 m to 520 m [101]. Budapest is located along the Danube River with substantially different districts on both the western (Buda) and eastern (Pest) sides; many of the city districts are found on the eastern side [102]. Budapest has 23 districts (see Figure 2, the author draws based on Arcgis), each with its own municipal government; the 7th district, compared to its size, is the most densely populated district of Budapest [103].

3.2. Participants

The SOP attitudes and QOL outcomes of migrants who live outside of their own country may be decreased, removed, repaired, or even strengthened during a crisis such as a coronavirus. Based on statistical reports, Budapest hosts the largest population of Iranians in Hungary [5]. To examine the present study hypotheses, we reviewed data from a sample of 120 Iranian residents in Budapest, Hungary (N = 1850), who lived in Budapest during the coronavirus pandemic. Because the statistical population of the study was not precisely known and was not available, the initial statistical sample was asked to introduce the other samples. Thus, the selection of the statistical sample started with an initial number of people; then, they were asked to introduce those who they thought were suitable for this study. The participants were Iranian migrants between 18 and 65 (average age = 30; standard deviation [SD] = 15; mean [M] = 48%; F = 52%).

3.3. Procedure

Due to the lack of face-to-face visits to complete the questionnaire, the data were collected using social media during the coronavirus pandemic and quarantine in Hungary (March–July 2020). For the collection of data, a snowball sampling design was adopted. This nonprobability sampling methodology was suggested for the analysis of transient and hard-to-reach communities [104,105,106] because it is focused on the recruitment of respondents from the established group. A snowball approach is a nonprobability sampling approach focused on the recruitment of test participants from established group systems and among their acquaintances [107]. The research questionnaire consists of three parts. The first part was related to demographic questions and general information about individuals. In the second part, the QOL outcomes (e.g., physical well-being, mental health, nature of social interactions, the health of the community, and general QOL) were measured, and in the third part, SOP attitudes were examined in relation to the research hypotheses. This research is an abstract postmodern study on a link between regional–urban, psychological, and environmental studies on critical conditions such as the coronavirus crisis, and the basis is an understanding and insight into immigrants. Finally, 120 migrants from the statistical community sent completed online questionnaires, and details were entered into SPSS and Smart PLS software after screening for preliminary analyses.

4. Results

4.1. Socio-demographic Factors

To better understand the relationship between attitudes toward SOP and findings from QOL between Iranian residents in Hungary during the coronavirus pandemic, socio-demographic factors were examined. The demographic information of the participants is presented in Table 1.

4.2. Smart Partial Least Squares (Smart PLS)

The present study is a quantitative method based on PLS. The main idea for using Smart PLS is its capacity to assess associations among endogenous and exogenous variables, even in the case of small samples [108], which can ensure the high internal consistency of the measures [109]. Once the questionnaire was finalized, due to the lack of face-to-face visits and to maintain the health conditions of the research community, data were collected from Google Forms via an online questionnaire from 120 Iranian residents in Budapest (Hungary) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We suggest that social media and online questionnaires such as Google Forms can be a good way to collect data, especially in critical situations such as coronavirus, since the analysis method needs fewer respondents. Therefore, when we have reconciled our everyday lives with the coronavirus, research methods must be changed and adapted to it. To enter and analyze the primary information, SPSS software V. 28 was used. The saved SPSS file was then moved to the Smart PLS software, and all the data were analyzed in the Smart PLS software. Finally, to investigate the hypothesized connections between latent variables, a structural model was operated.

4.3. Correlation of Research Variables

As an accepted methodology, a survey approach was chosen because it offers several benefits, including allowing uniform data to be gathered and allowing researchers to satisfy the study objective [110,111,112], namely, the same thing that forms the purpose of the present study. Initially, with the application of SEM research methodology to develop the model and propose the hypotheses based on it, the researchers first undertook a vast library study. Pearson correlation for the impact of SOP attitudes on QOL outcomes was calculated. The results showed a high correlation (more than 0.5). A correlation above 0.5 indicates a high correlation for research variables [113]. The results of the correlation analysis are presented in Table 2.

4.4. Compound Reliability (CR)

To claim that a metric is internally compatible, a score of at least 0.7 is required [114]. The composite durability is more acceptable than Cronbach’s alpha for PLS modeling [115]. Consequently, researchers can use composite reliability to sub the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient [116]. Convergent validity exists when the CR is greater than 0.7. CR must also be larger than AVE. In this case, there will be a convergent narrative condition. In short, the following relationships must be established for convergent validity [117].
  • CR > 0.5
  • CR > AVE
  • AVE > 0.5
  • (SOP = 0.715, QOL = 0.864)
The details of the convergent analysis are presented in Table 3:

4.5. Validity Divergent (DV)

Discriminant validity is illustrated by proof that, in practice, measurements of constructs that may not logically be closely linked to each other are not found to be highly correlated. Divergent validity should, in principle, be smaller in magnitude than convergent coefficients of validity. According to Aghmiuni et al. [118], in divergent validity, the difference between the structure indices and other structural indices is contrasted in the model. Comparing the square root of AVE in each structure with the correlation coefficients between the structures, this work is determined. A matrix in which the key diameter is the AVE square root value for each structure must be defined to do this, and the coefficients of correlation between each structure and other structures are the lower and upper main diameter values. As seen in Table 4, each structure’s AVE root is greater than the structure’s correlation coefficients with other structures, showing the acceptability of the structures’ divergent validity.

4.6. Factor Loading (FL)

The intensity of the relation of the loading factor between the factor (latent variable) and the observed variable is seen [118]. Factor loading indicates the relationship between visible and hidden variables. FL is always between zero and one. The relationship is regarded as weak when the FL is less than 0.3, and the relationship is desirable when the FL is higher than 0.6 [117]. According to Table 3, the level of FL is appropriate. The FL analysis is as follows:
  • Weak: FL < 0.3
  • Acceptable: 0.3 ≤ FL ≥ 0.6
  • Desirable: 0.6 ≤ FL
Table 4 indicates the coefficients of FL for the queries. Both the factor loadings can be shown to be greater than 0.5, which confirms that the calculation model’s efficiency is appropriate. The results of the factor loading analysis are presented in Table 5.

4.7. Check of Model Goodness of Fit (GOF)

Calculating the goodness of fit (GOF) of the model is the final step of structural equation simulation (SEM). It measures the overall goodness of fit for both the structural and measurement models collectively [119]. The GOF is calculated with the following formula:
GOF = A v g C o m m u n a l i t i e s × R 2
GOF interpretation:
  • Weak: GOF ≤ 0.10
  • Acceptable: 0.10 ≤ GOF ≥ 0. 25
  • Desirable: GOF ≥ 0.36
  • If: Avg (Communalities) = 0.738
  • R2: 0.542
Therefore: GOF =  0.738 × 0.542 = 0.632

4.8. Hypothesis Testing

The present study explicitly aimed to analyze the effects of SOP attitudes and HQOL in a Budapest survey of 120 Iranian people (Hungary) during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Eight theories were originally suggested for this reason. The hypothesis was set according to the model at this stage. Each of the exogenous variables (SOP) will influence the endogenous variables as defined in the model (see Figure 1 and Appendix A, Table A1, Table A2 and Table A3) (QOL). Any of them is then known as a hypothesis due to earlier studies (e.g., [5,30,41,45,98,120]) that highlighted the relationship of SOP attitude with QOL outcomes. In the present study, it was awaited that SOP attitude indicators would be linked to and affect QOL outcomes. After the review of the results, they were accepted in the end (see Table 6). SOP impacts the QOLL according to the table of hypothesis checking of Iranian residents in Budapest (Hungary) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

4.9. Designing the Final Research Model

According to the results of the research and after the final review of the goodness of fit of the initial model, the final model of the research is presented in Figure 3:

5. Discussion

The conclusions of the current thesis are focused on the philosophical model of science and resource-based theory (SOPQOL model), which confirms the main research hypotheses. The geographical location of Budapest, the tourist capacity of the city that increased rapidly, the climate, and the existence of prestigious scholarships and universities, especially in the field of medicine, are important factors in this claim. On the other hand, the results obtained from the QOL results, such as better income than the country of origin, access to health care, high protection, better emotions, physical environment efficiency, transportation satisfaction, and leisure activities, can be important factors for the confirmation of satisfaction with the QOL of Iranian residents in Hungary during the COVID-19 epidemic era. As reported, 83.9% of the respondents approved of the new location (Budapest) as their second home.
Our findings support previous studies describing the connection and effects of SOP and HQOL outcomes [30,39,45,99,121,122,123]. The findings of the current study explain the importance of SOP attitude theory and highlight its significance for environmental management, psychological and health studies, urban–regional planning, and negotiating HQOL during crisis periods. In addition, it describes how SOP attitudes among Iranian migrants will foster HQOL in host communities. Furthermore, the findings affirm the relevance of socio-demographic process variables as major determinants of attitudes toward SOP. SOP was profoundly felt by Iranians living in Hungary for more than ten years relative to those living in Hungary for less than five years during the pandemic of coronavirus. This might be due to several factors, such as the experience of older residents in finding the sanitary wares needed in the pandemic period, the fact that most respondents and immigrants are students, the fact that health insurance and health care (TAJ card) are mandatory and free of charge (especially for a student who has a scholarship), the launch of the online system and round-the-clock response and health care by the Hungarian government with the onset of the coronavirus epidemic in Hungary, and the accessibility of the Hungarian healthcare system.
Another effective factor of the research that makes SOP affect the QOL of people in the statistical population could be prestigious universities, especially in the fields of medicine and government scholarships (the most important of these scholarships is the Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship, which annually attracts several thousand students from all over the world to Hungary, especially Budapest). This, in turn, has created a kind of educational tourism [117]. The study findings also demonstrate that relative to other Iranian inhabitants, Central Iranians are more likely to retain and develop SOP attitudes. The study results in a history of education showing high-place attitudes among educated Iranian migrants relative to Iranians in high school or lower levels. In several reports, an increased interest in educational resources has also been correlated with the level of schooling as a person-related indicator that can influence QOL [124] and high levels of position dependency [125]. Place attachment has many documented favorable connections, including the acceptance of education spending schemes [126], such as Iranian scholarship opportunity programs in Hungary.

6. Conclusions, Limitations, and Recommendations

The results of this research provide us with information on SOP attitudes based on HQOL outcomes among Iranians living in Hungary during the coronavirus pandemic. Accordingly, all three SOP attitudes have a direct effect on the QOL of Iranian migrants in Budapest during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Due to the difficult conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic, problems at the time of arrival, and health stress and its coincidence with the quarantines in Hungary, most Iranians preferred to stay in Hungary. The results highlighted that despite these rules and protocols, Iranian immigrants had reported an acceptable and good SOP, which has had a direct and positive impact on their QOL. Among Iranian migrant studies in Europe, we believe that these contributions can provide the basis for the creation of an interdisciplinary field that explores the intersection of place (SOP) and health (QOL) as a significant investigative construct.
Several limitations need to be acknowledged in this research. Firstly, due to the first case of COVID-19 in Hungary being an Iranian student in Budapest and a significant percentage of participants being students, skepticism towards Iranians was a concern, and some participants were uncooperative in data collection, making the process time-consuming. Secondly, the outcomes of this study suggest that SOP perceptions are likely to be influenced by other unexplored factors that are often mediated or moderated by the impact of Iranian migrants’ HQOL, particularly in critical situations, which should be considered in future research. Moreover, this analysis was conducted during the early stages of the pandemic, which is a rapidly evolving and critical event that significantly impacts people’s sense of place and quality of life. Researchers theorize that the influence of the pandemic and quarantine on SOP and QOL may become more pronounced with time. Additionally, this study focused on Iranian residents in Hungary, and the results may not be generalizable to other cultural groups. It is essential to consider cultural factors when interpreting the findings and applying them to other populations. The literature review in this article indicates that there may be gaps in the understanding of the experiences of Iranian residents in Hungary during the pandemic. The absence of theoretical foundations may limit the understanding of the factors that contribute to the quality of life of Iranian residents in Hungary during the pandemic. Furthermore, the lack of studies on Iranians in European societies during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic limits the generalizability of the findings and makes it difficult to compare the experiences of Iranians in Hungary with those in other European countries. Future research should address these gaps to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the experiences of Iranians in Hungary and other European countries during the pandemic.
According to the research findings, it is suggested that the Iranian community in Hungary be formed, and through this training, suggestions, protocols, news, etc., be shared during crises such as coronavirus. Guidance and counseling centers for new immigrants should be established. We suggest that in future research, the causes of such migrations be investigated and, on the other hand, the SOP and QOL of these people in the destination countries be analyzed. Moreover, we believe that this outlook on science may be of great concern to policymakers in the field of urban–regional planning, immigration, psychological and health services, and environmental health management. It is clear that if SOP attitudes and QOL outcomes are in a relationship and connected by socio-demographic factors, this could be considered in future planning. Accordingly, policies should be customized to the unique needs and circumstances of life during crises such as coronavirus. It is suggested that researchers in future studies focus on Tourism Management Compatible with COVID-19 [127]. Therefore, when we have accustomed our everyday lives to coronavirus, research methods must be changed and adapted to it. Although quantitative methods are appropriate to identify the relationship between research variables in humanities, social sciences, urban and regional studies, and the environment, future studies can examine research-related models based on qualitative studies. Finally, we hope the current thesis will motivate and stimulate prospective researchers to validate our conceptual analysis model (SOPQOL model) in different contexts and pave the way for future research directions.
Future studies may present the characteristics of these additional factors, such as mental health, well-being, education, and economic factors, among the Iranian migrant population in Hungary and Europe. Specifically, conducting such interdisciplinary research can identify the relationship between QOL outcomes and SOP and can recognize immigrants’ barriers and problems. This can help governments plan at the macro and international levels. Immigration to Hungary, especially Budapest, has peaked in recent years. With the introduction of the quality of Hungarian universities and colleges and scholarship programs in Hungary (e.g., Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship), this population is gradually increasing. This has seriously created a kind of educational tourism in Hungary, especially in Budapest. Given that educational tourism in Hungary can be one of the factors attracting people from other countries, and on the other hand, the discussion about it cannot be included in this article, it is suggested that researchers address this issue in future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh), K.Z. and L.D.D.; methodology, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh), A.G., H.A., F.A.A. and H.M. (Hasan Mosazadeh); software, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh), A.G., H.A., F.A.A. and H.M. (Hasan Mosazadeh); validation, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh), A.G., H.A., F.A.A. and H.M. (Hasan Mosazadeh); formal analysis, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh), A.G., H.A., F.A.A. and H.M. (Hasan Mosazadeh); investigation, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh), A.G., H.A., F.A.A. and H.M. (Hasan Mosazadeh); resources, K.Z.; data curation, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh); writing—original draft preparation, H.M. (Hossein Mousazadeh); writing—review and editing, K.Z.; visualization, K.Z. and L.D.D.; supervision, K.Z.; project administration, K.Z. and L.D.D.; funding acquisition, K.Z. and L.D.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data developed in this study will be made available upon request to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationFull Name
COVID-19Corona Virus Disease 2019
SOPSense of place
QOLQuality of life
WHOWorld Health Organization
HQOLHealth-related quality of life

Appendix A

Table A1. Endogenous and Exogenous variables.
Table A1. Endogenous and Exogenous variables.
Endogenous VariablesExogenous Variables
QOLSOP
RowSubthemeSubtheme
1EnvironmentalPlace identity
2Physical HealthPlace attachment
3Social RelationshipsPlace dependence
4General QOL
5Physiological
Table A2. Variables: subvariables, and measures of the research model.
Table A2. Variables: subvariables, and measures of the research model.
MeasuresIndexV
Individual’s emotional attachment to a place
Deep symbolic attachment
Covering those dimensions of the self that define the individual’s personal identity in relation to the physical environment
Means of a complex pattern of conscious and unconscious ideas relevant to the environment
Beliefs, preferences, feelings, values, goals, and behavioral tendencies and skills relevant to the environment
Place identity (A11)SOP (A1)
Intensity of an individual’s perceptions
Connection between himself or herself and the place
The emotional bond between person and place
The main concept in environmental psychology
Place attachment (A12)
Primary functional attachment
Highlighting how the place supports specific activities
Connections between a physical setting and the activities
Antecedent variable for place identity
Positive effect on place identity
Place dependence (A13)
Freedom, physical safety, and security
Home environment
Financial resources
Health and social care: accessibility and quality
Opportunities for acquiring new information and skills
Participation in and opportunities for recreation/leisure activities
Physical environment (pollution/noise/traffic/climate)
Transport
Environmental (A21)QOL (A2)
Pain and discomfort
Sleep and rest
Energy and fatigue
Mobility
Activities of daily living
Dependence on medicinal substances and medical aids
Work capacity
Physical Health (A22)
Personal relationships
Social support
Sexual activity
Social Relationships (A23)
QOL satisfaction
Health satisfaction
General QOL (A24)
Positive feelings
Thinking, learning, memory, and concentration
Self-esteem
Bodily image and appearance
Negative feelings
Spirituality/religion/personal beliefs
Physiological (A25)
Note: WHO QOL-BREF domains of quality of life: overall quality of life and general health.
Table A3. Quality of life.
Table A3. Quality of life.
CategoryProject
Physical healthDo you have enough energy for everyday life?
How well are you able to get around?
How satisfied are you with your sleep?
How satisfied are you with your ability to perform your daily living activities?
How satisfied are you with your capacity for work?
How much do you enjoy your life?
To what extent do you feel your life to be meaningful?
Psychological healthHow well are you able to concentrate?
Are you able to accept your bodily appearance?
How satisfied are you with yourself?
How often do you have negative feelings?
How satisfied are you with your personal relationships?
How satisfied are you with your sex life?
Social relationshipsHow satisfied are you with the support you get from your friends?
How safe do you feel in your daily life?
How healthy is your physical environment?
EnvironmentHave you enough money to meet your needs?
How available to you is the information that you need in your day-to-day life?
To what extent do you have the opportunity for leisure activities?
How satisfied are you with the conditions of your living place?
How satisfied are you with your access to health services?
How satisfied are you with your transport?
General QOLHow would you rate your QOL?
How satisfied are you with your health?

References

  1. De Guimarães, J.C.F.; Severo, E.A.; Júnior, L.A.F.; Da Costa, W.P.L.B.; Salmoria, F.T. Governance and quality of life in smart cities: Towards sustainable development goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Camboim, G.F.; Zawislak, P.A.; Pufal, N.A. Driving elements to make cities smarter: Evidences from European projects. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019, 142, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mousazadeh, H.; Ghorbani, A.; Azadi, H.; Almani, F.A.; Zangiabadi, A.; Zhu, K.; Dávid, L.D. Developing Sustainable Behaviors for Underground Heritage Tourism Management: The Case of Persian Qanats, a UNESCO World Heritage Property. Land 2023, 12, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ping, W.; Zheng, J.; Niu, X.; Guo, C.; Zhang, J.; Yang, H.; Shi, Y. Evaluation of health-related quality of life using EQ-5D in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mousazadeh, H. Sense of Place, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life as a Part of Community Well-being in Three European Community. Geoplanning J. Geomat. Plan. 2020, 9, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, C.; Stevens, C.; Conrad, R.; Hahm, H. Evidence for elevated psychiatric distress, poor sleep, and quality of life concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic among US young adults with suspected and reported psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 292, 113345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, M.H.; Do, B.N.; Tran, C.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.; Pham, K.M.; Pham, L.V.; Tran, K.V.; Duong, T.T.; Tran, T.V. People with suspected COVID-19 symptoms were more likely depressed and had lower health-related quality of life: The potential benefit of health literacy. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ma, Y.-F.; Li, W.; Deng, H.-B.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P.-H.; Bo, H.-X.; Cao, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, L.-Y. Prevalence of depression and its association with quality of life in clinically stable patients with COVID-19. J. Affect. Disord. 2020, 275, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pulvirenti, F.; Cinetto, F.; Milito, C.; Bonanni, L.; Pesce, A.M.; Leodori, G.; Garzi, G.; Miglionico, M.; Tabolli, S.; Quinti, I. Health-related quality of life in common variable immunodeficiency Italian patients switched to remote assistance during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2020, 8, 1894–1899.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Y.; Ma, Z.F. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Qiao, J. What are the risks of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women? Lancet 2020, 395, 760–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R. China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.-M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.-G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.; Tian, J.; Pei, Y. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Mosazadeh, H.; Razi, F.F.; Lajevardi, M.; Mousazadeh, H.; Ghorbani, A.; Almani, F.A.; Shiran, F. Restarting medical tourism in the COVID-19 pandemic: A strategic-based approach. J. Health Rep. Technol. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ciulla, M.M. History repeating. The plague of 1630 in Milan and the COVID-19 pandemia. Acta Biomed. 2020, 91, 234–235. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Raoofi, A.; Takian, A.; Sari, A.A.; Olyaeemanesh, A.; Haghighi, H.; Aarabi, M. COVID-19 pandemic and comparative health policy learning in Iran. Arch. Iran. Med. 2020, 23, 220–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Collins, F.S.; Stoffels, P. Accelerating COVID-19 therapeutic interventions and vaccines (ACTIV): An unprecedented partnership for unprecedented times. JAMA 2020, 323, 2455–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Calmon, M. Considerations of coronavirus (COVID-19) impact and the management of the dead in Brazil. Forensic Sci. Int. Rep. 2020, 2, 100110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Takian, A.; Kiani, M.M.; Khanjankhani, K. COVID-19 and the need to prioritize health equity and social determinants of health. Int. J. Public Health 2020, 65, 521–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Buchanan, L.; Patel, J.K.; Rosenthal, B.M.; Singhvi, A. A month of coronavirus in New York City: See the hardest-hit areas. New York Times 2020, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hiscott, J.; Alexandridi, M.; Muscolini, M.; Tassone, E.; Palermo, E.; Soultsioti, M.; Zevini, A. The global impact of the coronavirus pandemic. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2020, 53, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anita, K.; Szilvia, K.; András, L.; Péter, H.; Tamás, M.; Zsolt, S.; Barna, B. Diagnostic consideration and bedside estimation of the prognosis in COVID-19 patients. Orvosi. Hetilap. 2020, 161, 667–671. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kemenesi, G.; Kornya, L.; Tóth, G.E.; Kurucz, K.; Zeghbib, S.; Somogyi, B.A.; Zöldi, V.; Urbán, P.; Herczeg, R.; Jakab, F. Nursing homes and the elderly regarding the COVID-19 pandemic: Situation report from Hungary. GeroScience 2020, 42, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rácz, A. A New Risk to the EU from Coronavirus. (DGAP Kommentar); Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e.V.: Berlin, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Khan, G.; Sheek-Hussein, M.; Al Suwaidi, A.R.; Idris, K.; Abu-Zidan, F.M. Novel coronavirus pandemic: A global health threat. Turk. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 20, 55. [Google Scholar]
  26. Beatriz Lara, B.; Carnes, A.; Dakterzada, F.; Benitez, I.; Piñol-Ripoll, G. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and quality of life in Spanish Alzheimer’s disease patients during COVID-19 lockdown. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020, 27, 1744–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Riva, G.; Wiederhold, B.K. How cyberpsychology and virtual reality can help us to overcome the psychological burden of coronavirus. Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw. 2020, 23, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Schröter, M.; Başak, E.; Christie, M.; Church, A.; Keune, H.; Osipova, E.; Oteros-Rozas, E.; Sievers-Glotzbach, S.; van Oudenhoven, A.P.; Balvanera, P. Indicators for relational values of nature’s contributions to good quality of life: The IPBES approach for Europe and Central Asia. Ecosyst. People 2020, 16, 50–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Arias-Merino, E.D.; Espinel-Bermudez, M.C.; Vázquez-Arias, C.E.; Medrano-Ramos, M.; de Ciencias, C.U. Aging in Place and Quality of Life. In Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  30. Counted, V. Sense of place attitudes and quality of life outcomes among African residents in a multicultural Australian society. J. Community Psychol. 2019, 47, 338–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carmona, M. Place value: Place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. J. Urban Des. 2019, 24, 1–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Joaquim Araújo de Azevedo, A.; João Ferreira Custódio, M.; Pereira Antunes Perna, F. “Are you happy here?”: The relationship between quality of life and place attachment. J. Place Manag. Dev. 2013, 6, 102–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mulvaney, K.K.; Merrill, N.H.; Mazzotta, M.J. Sense of place and water quality: Applying sense of place metrics to better understand community impacts of changes in water quality. In Water Quality-Science, Assessments and Policy; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ainsworth, G.B.; Kenter, J.O.; O’Connor, S.; Daunt, F.; Young, J.C. A fulfilled human life: Eliciting sense of place and cultural identity in two UK marine environments through the Community Voice Method. Ecosyst. Serv. 2019, 39, 100992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Verbrugge, L.; Buchecker, M.; Garcia, X.; Gottwald, S.; Müller, S.; Præstholm, S.; Stahl Olafsson, A. Integrating sense of place in planning and management of multifunctional river landscapes: Experiences from five European case studies. Sustain. Sci. 2019, 14, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ghorbani, A.; Raufirad, V.; Rafiaani, P.; Azadi, H. Ecotourism sustainable development strategies using SWOT and QSPM model: A case study of Kaji Namakzar Wetland, South Khorasan Province, Iran. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2015, 16, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Valizadeh, N.; Bijani, M.; Karimi, H.; Naeimi, A.; Hayati, D.; Azadi, H. The effects of farmers’ place attachment and identity on water conservation moral norms and intention. Water Res. 2020, 185, 116131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Žlender, V.; Gemin, S. Testing urban dwellers’ sense of place towards leisure and recreational peri-urban green open spaces in two European cities. Cities 2020, 98, 102579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gheitarani, N.; El-Sayed, S.; Cloutier, S.; Budruk, M.; Gibbons, L.; Khanian, M. Investigating the mechanism of place and community impact on quality of life of rural-urban migrants. Int. J. Community Well-Being 2020, 3, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Acedo, A.; Painho, M.; Casteleyn, S. Place and city: Operationalizing sense of place and social capital in the urban context. Trans. GIS 2017, 21, 503–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tartaglia, S. Different predictors of quality of life in urban environment. Soc. Indic. Res. 2013, 113, 1045–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Williams, A.; Kitchen, P. Sense of place and health in Hamilton, Ontario: A case study. Soc. Indic. Res. 2012, 108, 257–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Counted, V.; Possamai, A.; McAuliffe, C.; Meade, T. Attachment to Australia, attachment to God, and quality of life outcomes among African Christian diasporas in New South Wales: A cross-sectional study. J. Spiritual. Ment. Health 2020, 22, 65–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Afshar, P.F.; Foroughan, M.; Vedadhir, A.; Tabatabaei, M.G. The effects of place attachment on social well-being in older adults. Educ. Gerontol. 2017, 43, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Marcheschi, E.; Laike, T.; Brunt, D.; Hansson, L.; Johansson, M. Quality of life and place attachment among people with severe mental illness. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 41, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. The experienced psychological benefits of place attachment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2017, 51, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lewicka, M. Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Najafi, M.; Shariff, M.K. The Concept of Place and SOP in Architectural Studies. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2011, 5, 1054–1060. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jorgensen, B.S.; Stedman, R.C. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. J. Environ. Psychol. 2001, 21, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jorgensen, B.S.; Stedman, R.C. A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. J. Environ. Manag. 2006, 79, 316–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, B.; Mi, Z.; Zhang, Z. Willingness of the new generation of farmers to participate in rural tourism: The role of perceived impacts and sense of place. Sustainability 2020, 12, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Matarrita-Cascante, D.; Stedman, R.; Luloff, A. Permanent and seasonal residents’ community attachment in natural amenity-rich areas: Exploring the contribution of landscape-related factors. Environ. Behav. 2010, 42, 197–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hallak, R.; Brown, G.; Lindsay, N.J. The Place Identity–Performance relationship among tourism entrepreneurs: A structural equation modelling analysis. Tour. Manag. 2012, 33, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Devine-Wright, P.; Price, J.; Leviston, Z. My country or my planet? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2015, 30, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Nicolosi, E.; Corbett, J.B. Engagement with climate change and the environment: A review of the role of relationships to place. Local Environ. 2018, 23, 77–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Butler, T. Memoryscape: How audio walks can deepen our sense of place by integrating art, oral history and cultural geography. Geogr. Compass 2007, 1, 360–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nelson, J.; Ahn, J.J.; Corley, E.A. Sense of place: Trends from the literature. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 2020, 13, 236–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jorgensen, B.S. Subjective mapping methodologies for incorporating spatial variation in research on social capital and sense of place. Tijdschr. Voor Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2010, 101, 554–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pretty, G.H.; Chipuer, H.M.; Bramston, P. Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Chapin III, F.S.; Knapp, C.N. Sense of place: A process for identifying and negotiating potentially contested visions of sustainability. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 53, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Gifford, R. Environmental psychology matters. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2014, 65, 541–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Su, M.M.; Wall, G. Place Attachment and Heritage Tourism at the Great Wall. J. China Tour. Res. 2010, 6, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Williams, D.R. Beyond the commodity metaphor, revisited. In Place Attachment Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2014; pp. 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mousazadeh, H.; Akbarzadeh, F.; Mousazadeh, H. Investigating the Impacts of River Tourism on the Quality of Life of Citizens (Case study: Gohar rood River of Rasht City, Iran). J. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2019, 6, 69–80. [Google Scholar]
  65. Williams, D.R.; Vaske, J.J. The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. For. Sci. 2003, 49, 830–840. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hesari, E.; Peysokhan, M.; Havashemi, A.; Gheibi, D.; Ghafourian, M.; Bayat, F. Analyzing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationship with residential satisfaction in new cities: The case of Sadra, Iran. Soc. Indic. Res. 2019, 142, 1031–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kirkpatrick, L.A. Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  68. Consedine, N.S.; Magai, C. Attachment and emotion experience in later life: The view from emotions theory. Attach. Hum. Dev. 2003, 5, 165–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Flannelly, K.J.; Galek, K. Religion, evolution, and mental health: Attachment theory and ETAS theory. J. Relig. Health 2010, 49, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Marganska, A.; Gallagher, M.; Miranda, R. Adult attachment, emotion dysregulation, and symptoms of depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Am. J. Orthopsychiatr. 2013, 83, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Schore, A.N. Affect Regulation and the Repair of the Self; WW Norton & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2003; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu, Y.; Jin, X.; Dupre, K. Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management. Cities 2022, 122, 103521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stedman, R.C. Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environ. Behav. 2002, 34, 561–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wynveen, C.J.; Kyle, G.T.; Sutton, S.G. Place meanings ascribed to marine settings: The case of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Leis. Sci. 2010, 32, 270–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. van Putten, I.E.; Plagányi, É.E.; Booth, K.; Cvitanovic, C.; Kelly, R.; Punt, A.E.; Richards, S.A. A framework for incorporating sense of place into the management of marine systems. Ecol. Soc. 2018, 23, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Comparing the theories of interpersonal and place attachment. In Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods, and Applications; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2014; pp. 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  78. Scannell, L.; Gifford, R. Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Environ. Behav. 2016, 49, 359–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ingalls, M.; Stedman, R. Engaging with human identity in social-ecological systems: A dialectical approach. Hum. Ecol. Rev. 2017, 23, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Farnum, J. Sense of Place in Natural Resource Recreation and Tourism: An Evaluation and Assessment of Research Findings; U.S. Department of Agriculture: Long Beach, CA, USA, 2005.
  81. Manzo, L.C. Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003, 23, 47–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Alexandris, K.; Kouthouris, C.; Meligdis, A. Increasing customers’ loyalty in a skiing resort: The contribution of place attachment and service quality. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2006, 18, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lee, T.H.; Shen, Y.L. The influence of leisure involvement and place attachment on destination loyalty: Evidence from recreationists walking their dogs in urban parks. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 33, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Stobbelaar, D.J.; Pedroli, B. Perspectives on landscape identity: A conceptual challenge. Landsc. Res. 2011, 36, 321–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Hernández, B.; Hidalgo, M.C.; Salazar-Laplace, M.E.; Hess, S. Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. J. Environ. Psychol. 2007, 27, 310–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bonnes, M.; Passafaro, P.; Carrus, G. The ambivalence of attitudes toward urban green areas: Between proenvironmental worldviews and daily residential experience. Environ. Behav. 2011, 43, 207–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Carrus, G.; Bonaiuto, M.; Bonnes, M. Environmental concern, regional identity, and support for protected areas in Italy. Environ. Behav. 2005, 37, 237–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Elena, S. National identity as core concept for the European standardization procedure. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 39, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Kyle, G.; Graefe, A.; Manning, R. Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environ. Behav. 2005, 37, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Vaske, J.J.; Kobrin, K.C. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. J. Environ. Educ. 2001, 32, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mousazadeh, H. Investigating the sense of place attitudes to quality of life of urban communities nearby the river, Folia. Geographica 2022, 64, 104–125. [Google Scholar]
  92. Bissell, D. A changing sense of place: Geography and COVID-19. Geogr. Res. 2021, 59, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ferreira, L.N.; Pereira, L.N.; da Fé Brás, M.; Ilchuk, K. Quality of life under the COVID-19 quarantine. Qual. Life Res. 2021, 30, 1389–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nandasena, H.; Pathirathna, M.; Atapattu, A.; Prasanga, P. Quality of life of COVID 19 patients after discharge: Systematic review. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Beckley, T.M. The Relative Importance of Sociocultural and Ecological Factors in Attachment to Place; United States Department of Agriculture: Seattle, DC, USA, 2003.
  96. Sampson, K.A.; Goodrich, C.G. Making place: Identity construction and community formation through “sense of place” in Westland, New Zealand. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2009, 22, 901–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Billig, M.; Kreitler, S.; Zadernovsky, A.; Alkalay, Y. The impact of place attachment and coping on the quality of life of Jewish and Druze children in Israel. J. Psychol. Sci. 2016, 2, 13–31. [Google Scholar]
  98. Rollero, C.; De Piccoli, N. Does place attachment affect social well-being? Eur. Rev. Appl. Psychol. 2010, 60, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gattino, S.; De Piccoli, N.; Fassio, O.; Rollero, C. Quality of life and sense of community. A study on health and place of residence. J. of Com. Psy. 2013, 41, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Gallina, M.; Williams, A. Variations in sense of place across immigrant status and gender in Hamilton, Ontario; Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; and, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 121, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Rigó, A.; Barina, Z. Methodology of the habitat classification of anthropogenic urban areas in Budapest (Hungary). Biol. Futur. 2020, 71, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Buzási, A.; Jäger, B.S. District-scale assessment of urban sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 62, 102388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Szabó, A. Density of the Budapest downtown bocks (Hun: A pesti Belváros tömbjeinek sűrűsége). In Budapest 2050, Survival Chances of the Budapest Downtown Blocks (Hun: Budapest 2050, a Belvárosi Tömbök Fennmaradásának Esélyei); Alföldi, G., Ed.; Terc Kft.: Budapest, Hungary, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  104. Gillies, A. Using Research in Nursing: A Workbook for Practitioners; Radcliffe Publishing: London, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  105. Southern, D.A.; Lewis, S.; Maxwell, C.J.; Dunn, J.R.; Noseworthy, T.W.; Corbett, G.; Thomas, K.; Ghali, W.A. Sampling’hard-to-reach’populations in health research: Yield from a study targeting Americans living in Canada. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2008, 8, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Renzaho, A.; Bilal, P.; Marks, G.C. Obesity, type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure amongst recently arrived Sudanese refugees in Queensland, Australia. J. Immigr. Minor. Health 2014, 16, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhou, Q.; Zhu, K.; Kang, L.; Dávid, L.D. Tea Culture Tourism Perception: A Study on the Harmony of Importance and Performance. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ghorbani, A.; Danaei, A.; Zargar, S.M.; Hematian, H. Designing of smart tourism organization (STO) for tourism management: A case study of tourism organizations of South Khorasan province, Iran. Heliyon 2019, 5, e01850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Anabila, P.; Anome, J.; Kwadjo Kumi, D. Assessing service quality in Ghana’s public hospitals: Evidence from Greater Accra and Ashanti Regions. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2020, 31, 1009–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kautsarina, H.A.N.; Anggorojati, B.; Abidin, Z.; Phusavat, K. Data modeling positive security behavior implementation among smart device users in Indonesia: A partial least squares structural equation modeling approach (PLS-SEM). Data Brief 2020, 30, 105588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Yudatama, U.; Hidayanto, A.N.; Nazief, B.A.; Phusavat, K. Data to model the effect of awareness on the success of IT Governance implementation: A partial least squares structural equation modeling approach (PLS-SEM). Data Brief 2019, 25, 104333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Maziriri, E.T.; Madinga, N.W. Data to model the prognosticators of luxury consumption: A partial least squares-structural equation modelling approach (PLS-SEM). Data Brief 2018, 21, 753–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ortiz-Gómez, M.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Molina-Sánchez, H. Human values and work engagement: The mediating role of authenticity among workers in a spanish religious organization. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Mitchell, M.; Jolley, J. Research Design Explained; Wadsworth Cengage Learning: Belmont, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  115. Cheng, Y.; Zhu, K.; Zhou, Q.; El Archi, Y.; Kabil, M.; Remenyik, B.; Dávid, L.D. Tourism Ecological Efficiency and Sustainable Development in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Measure Model Study. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vuong, B.N.; Khanh Giao, H.N. The impact of perceived brand globalness on consumers’ purchase intention and the moderating role of consumer ethnocentrism: An evidence from Vietnam. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2020, 32, 47–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ghorbani, A.; Danaei, A.; Barzegar, S.M.; Hemmatian, H. Post modernism and designing smart tourism organization (STO) for tourism management. J. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2019, 8, 50–69. [Google Scholar]
  118. Aghmiuni, S.K.; Siyal, S.; Wang, Q.; Duan, Y. Assessment of factors affecting innovation policy in biotechnology. J. Innov. Knowl. 2020, 5, 180–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Thakkar, J.J. Structural Equation Modelling; Springer Publication: Singapore, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  120. Prezza, M.; Costantini, S. Sense of community and life satisfaction: Investigation in three different territorial contexts. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 8, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Dandy, J.; Horwitz, P.; Campbell, R.; Drake, D.; Leviston, Z. Leaving home: Place attachment and decisions to move in the face of environmental change. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2019, 19, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhu, K.; Zhou, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Yan, X.; Alimov, A.; Farmanov, E.; Dávid, L.D. Regional Sustainability: Pressures and Responses of Tourism Economy and Ecological Environment in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023, 11, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zhu, K.; Cheng, Y.; Zang, W.; Zhou, Q.; El Archi, Y.; Mousazadeh, H.; Kabil, M.; Csobán, K.; Dávid, L.D. Multiscenario Simulation of Land-Use Change in Hubei Province, China Based on the Markov-FLUS Model. Land 2023, 12, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rutenfrans-Stupar, M.; Hanique, N.; Van Regenmortel, T.; Schalk, R. The importance of self-mastery in enhancing quality of life and social participation of individuals experiencing homelessness: Results of a mixed-method study. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020, 148, 491–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Kil, N.; Holland, S.M.; Stein, T.V. Experiential benefits, place meanings, and environmental setting preferences between proximate and distant visitors to a national scenic trail. Environ. Manag. 2015, 55, 1109–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Kyle, G.T.; Absher, J.D.; Graefe, A.R. The moderating role of place attachment on the relationship between attitudes toward fees and spending preferences. Leis. Sci. 2003, 25, 33–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Morabi Jouybari, H.; Ghorbani, A.; Mousazadeh, H.; Golafshan, A.; Akbarzadeh Almani, F.; Dénes, D.L.; Krisztián, R. Smartphones as a Platform for Tourism Management Dynamics during Pandemics: A Case Study of the Shiraz Metropolis, Iran. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The conceptual model framework of research designed based on research variables (SOPQOL model) [5].
Figure 1. The conceptual model framework of research designed based on research variables (SOPQOL model) [5].
Sustainability 15 06608 g001
Figure 2. The study area. Location of Hungary on European map (A), the location of Budapest in Hungary (B), Budapest map (C), and Budapest districts ((D), 23 districts).
Figure 2. The study area. Location of Hungary on European map (A), the location of Budapest in Hungary (B), Budapest map (C), and Budapest districts ((D), 23 districts).
Sustainability 15 06608 g002
Figure 3. Final model.
Figure 3. Final model.
Sustainability 15 06608 g003
Table 1. Socio-demographic factors of participants.
Table 1. Socio-demographic factors of participants.
GenderMaleFemale
53.8%46.2%
Accepted the new place (Budapest) as the second homeYesNo
83.9%16.1%
Marital statusMarriedSingleDivorced/widowed/separated
42.4%50.8%6.8%
Length of residenceLess than five years5–10 yearsMore than 10 years
60%26.1%13.9%
Income/monthLow incomeMiddle incomeUpper income
46.1%52.2%1.7%
Region of originCentral IranNorthern IranSouthern IranEastern IranWestern Iran
32.2%18.6%14.4%17.8%17%
Note: As mentioned earlier, the majority of the Iranian immigrant population in Budapest is students due to the quality of universities and scholarship programs between the two countries.
Table 2. Correlation analysis of the structures and indices.
Table 2. Correlation analysis of the structures and indices.
A11A12A13A21A22A23A24A25A1A2
A1110.5550.6660.6110.7110.4320.4210.6550.4290.651
A12 10.6040.3480.6530.7420.4320.6540.4320.623
A13 10.7620.3910.5120.5120.5630.5940.587
A21 10.3410.4210.4380.7760.4380.724
A22 10.6250.6250.6530.4390.68
A23 10.4320.3520.4320.334
A24 10.6550.7650.655
A25 10.7980.388
A1 10.444
A2 1
Table 3. Convergent Validity.
Table 3. Convergent Validity.
VariableCronbach’s AlphaAVECR
A110.8220.5550.763
A120.8490.6540.715
A130.8330.6560.777
A210.7640.6310.888
A220.8340.6440.866
A230.8320.6110.781
A240.7220.5370.841
A250.8230.5610.766
A10.8880.6660.715
A20.7640.5550.864
Table 4. Divergent validity (DV).
Table 4. Divergent validity (DV).
A11A12A13A14A21A22A23A24A25A1A2
A110.61
A120.310.74
A130.410.450.79
A140.310.330.390.88
A210.210.220.350.510.73
A220.250.560.220.50.510.63
A230.260.280.40.170.240.140.71
A240.110.230.250.390.270.150.340.76
A250.410.300.200.190.240.450.310.400.77
A10.420.2500.550.150.670.690.280.400.560.67
A20.260.280.410.160.330.140.440.280.70.170.79
Table 5. Factor loading analysis.
Table 5. Factor loading analysis.
RowStructureIndexFLRowStructureIndexFL
1A11PI 10.815A21E10.87
PI 20.92E20.91
PI 30.76E30.78
PI 40.78E40.89
PI 50.71E50.80
PI 60.63E60.86
2A12PA 10.676A22PH10.66
PA 20.62PH20.84
PA 30.73PH30.88
PA 40.92PH40.98
PA50.88PH50.77
PA60.98PH60.97
PA70.82
PH70.87
7A23SR10.71
SR20.82
SR30.69
3A13PD10.818A24GQOL10.77
PD20.86
PD30.64GQOL20.99
PD40.84
PD50.88
PD60.91
PD70.77
9A25P10.71
P20.99
P30.75
P40.67
P50.98
P60.82
Note: Place identity (PI), environmental (E), place attachment (PA), physical health (PH), social relationships (SR), place dependence (PD), general quality of life (GQOL), physiological (P).
Table 6. Hypothesis testing.
Table 6. Hypothesis testing.
HßTpResult
The main hypothesisSOP affected QOL among Iranian residents in Hungary0.7555.81p < 0.05
H1Place identity has a significant effect on the SOP.0.5813.77p < 0.05
H2Place attachment has a significant effect on the SOP.0.6013.14p < 0.05
H3Place dependence has a significant effect on the SOP.0.8903.18p < 0.05
H4Environmental conditions have an important influence on QOL.0.5223.28p < 0.05
H5Physical health has an important influence on QOL.0.6453.88p < 0.05
H6Social relationships have a considerable influence on QOL.0.8115.22p < 0.05
H7Common QOL has a big influence on QOL.0.6174.91p < 0.05
H8Physiological effects on the QOL are significant.0.4813.14p < 0.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mousazadeh, H.; Ghorbani, A.; Azadi, H.; Almani, F.A.; Mosazadeh, H.; Zhu, K.; Dávid, L.D. Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086608

AMA Style

Mousazadeh H, Ghorbani A, Azadi H, Almani FA, Mosazadeh H, Zhu K, Dávid LD. Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary. Sustainability. 2023; 15(8):6608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mousazadeh, Hossein, Amir Ghorbani, Hossein Azadi, Farahnaz Akbarzadeh Almani, Hasan Mosazadeh, Kai Zhu, and Lóránt Dénes Dávid. 2023. "Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary" Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086608

APA Style

Mousazadeh, H., Ghorbani, A., Azadi, H., Almani, F. A., Mosazadeh, H., Zhu, K., & Dávid, L. D. (2023). Sense of Place Attitudes on Quality of Life during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case of Iranian Residents in Hungary. Sustainability, 15(8), 6608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop