Risks and Requirements in Sustainable App Development—A Review
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
See the attched report for comments
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
please see the attachment.
Thank you
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
This paper presents an approach (systematic review and model presentation) regarding 2 intersting research questions:
-
Which requirements and risks in dealing with apps are demanded or perceived by the users?
-
How can sustainability be recognized and integrated in app development?
Some sentences begin with reference. Must improve that. EX: "[5]. [6] stated,.." or ". [16] stated,".
Table 1, in each row must have also the reference to the corresponding paper, since in section 3 references are the link to the 25 studies.
Before conclusions it is recommended a section about possible limitations of this systematic review / study.
in the abstract is that "..., it will be investigated how sustainability can be integrated into app development". It would be important to have in the conclusions a more clear presentation about how it can be integrated into app development.
In conclusions must be more clear the answer to both research questions presented in the end of section 1.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
Please see the attachment.
Thank you.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The author illustrated about a review on Risks and Requirements in Sustainable App Development.
In the abstract, suggested to include a few features of Sustainable App Development Model
In the section #2, add a few more points related to introduction about the comparative analysis of various Sustainable App Development methods and its requirements.
In the state of art section , suggested to add more key points related to challenges of the sustainable app development from the last 4 years of research publications.
In the section #2, explain the key points related to importance of the data mentioned in the Table 1. Resulting list of articles.
In the section #3, add the graphical views of what the various parameters are considered in the the result section.
The discussion and conclusion sections are satisfied.
In the reference section suggested to add the recent publications about risk and requirements of sustainable development applications
Check the overall article structure to match the requirements of MDPI sustainability journal with a quality content.
Check the grammatical errors and try to add more content in the result and discussion part with graphical representations.
Author Response
Dear reviewer,
please see the attachment.
Thank you.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
