Abstract
Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have become very popular in the research community for addressing complex issues in intelligent transportation. This has resulted in many scientific papers being published across various transportation topics over the past decade. This paper conducts a systematic review of the intelligent transportation literature using a scientometric analysis, aiming to summarize what is already known, identify current research trends, evaluate academic impacts, and suggest future research directions. The study provides a detailed review by analyzing 113 journal articles from the Web of Science (WoS) database. It examines the growth of publications over time, explores the collaboration patterns of key contributors, such as researchers, countries, and organizations, and employs techniques such as co-authorship analysis and keyword co-occurrence analysis to delve into the publication clusters and identify emerging research topics. Nine emerging sub-topics are identified and qualitatively discussed. The outcomes include recognizing pioneering researchers in intelligent transportation for potential collaboration opportunities, identifying reliable sources of information for publishing new work, and aiding researchers in selecting the best solutions for specific problems. These findings help researchers better understand the application of ML and DL in the intelligent transportation literature and guide research policymakers and editorial boards in selecting promising research topics for further research and development.
1. Introduction
By 2050, the global urban population is projected to reach around 66% to 70% [1,2]. This rapid urbanization is likely to profoundly impact environmental sustainability, city management, and urban safety. To address the challenges this poses, several countries have introduced the concept of “smart cities” as a strategy to manage resources and optimize energy usage effectively. Central to the smart-city framework are such sectors as intelligent transportation, cybersecurity, and smart grids, which are significantly influenced by the integration of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). These technologies enhance efficiency and scalability in smart city initiatives.
Machine learning and deep learning are two core subfields within the field of artificial intelligence that, although they share similar goals and theoretical foundations, differ significantly in terms of technical implementation, data dependency, hardware requirements, feature engineering, execution time, and interpretability. Machine learning involves a series of algorithms that perform specific tasks by learning patterns from data, while deep learning focuses on using neural network models, especially deep networks with multiple hidden layers, to learn complex representations of data. Deep-learning models require large amounts of data and high-performance hardware, typically take longer to execute, and are less interpretable [3].
Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) represent a synergy of smart devices, control systems, and information technology. These generate a substantial volume of data, playing a pivotal role in the success of smart cities [4]. Intelligent transportation solutions can enhance traffic-flow management by monitoring traffic patterns and optimizing traffic-signal timing. The overarching goal is to promote sustainable transportation modes, using ITS to provide real-time information and traffic management systems (TMS) to manage congestion. These systems aim to enhance safety and encourage environmental sustainability by minimizing the consumption of fuels and reducing energy use [5].
Despite considerable research into various applications of ML and DL in intelligent transportation, the studies vary widely, with research areas including traffic-flow prediction [6], authors conduct a brief survey to explore the various fundamental and important aspects of smart cities. Some of the important challenges discussed were designing a data-based solution to manage the transportation organization of a smart city through the use of machine-learning algorithms. ITS [7], congestion management [8], smart parking solutions [9], and enhancements to public transportation [10]. This may challenge some researchers and policymakers to understand the field comprehensively.
Moreover, while these studies contribute valuable insights, they have prominent limitations [10]. Primarily, many rely on traditional qualitative literature reviews that the cognitive biases and interpretative limits of the researchers may influence. Furthermore, while the use of ML and DL in intelligent transportation has attracted significant interest, a holistic review of their applications remains absent [5]. In addition, there is a lack of quantitative analysis and generalization across studies, which would benefit from aggregating the findings from a substantial corpus of the literature over an extended period. This gap emphasizes the need for more systematic and comprehensive research approaches.
To address the identified research gaps, this study uses a scientometric analysis complemented by visualization techniques to quantitatively assess the maturity and utilization of ML and DL across various research domains within intelligent transportation, drawing on a robust dataset of the long-term literature [11]. A scientometric analysis is a quantitative research method using mathematical and statistical methods to study the output, distribution, citations, author cooperation patterns, and other characteristics of scientific literature. It can help researchers understand research trends and trends in specific fields and evaluate the influence of research results [12]. The contributions are twofold. First, a foundation is provided for future studies to use optimal solutions for specific challenges based on established studies, facilitating further exploration within their respective fields. Second, the study details the specific content and growing trends in applying scientometric methods to this research area, offering a systematic review and summarizing the current state of knowledge.
The structure of this paper is as follows. Section 2 outlines the research methodology, including bibliometric methods and the software tools used. Section 3 presents the analysis and findings. Section 4 discusses these findings in a qualitative context. Finally, Section 5 concludes by discussing conclusive remarks, theoretical contributions, practical implications, and research limitations.
2. Research Methods
Scientometric analysis helps researchers find findings relevant to the literature that would not be possible with other methods. Bibliometrics or scientometrics are usually used in scientific mapping research [13]. While the focus of bibliometrics is on the literature itself, scientometrics provides a broader approach that includes bibliometrics tools, methods, and data to analyze the literature and its outputs to identify underlying insight patterns and trends in the field [14]. A scientometric analysis is carried out using the widely recognized three-step approach [15,16,17,18] illustrated in Figure 1. The initial data-collection stage involves acquiring bibliographic data from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database. The second stage focuses on selecting the appropriate analysis methods and software tools. Microsoft Excel is a widely used spreadsheet software that provides powerful data processing and analysis capabilities. In scientometrics analysis, it is necessary to organize, clean, and analyze the data first, and the table function of Excel can facilitate these operations. VOSviewer (1.6.20) is a tool specifically designed to create and visualize bibliometric networks. It can help researchers analyze and display the citations, co-citations, and cooperative relationships in the literature [15,17,18]. The final stage, data analysis and discovery, is divided into three sub-stages: (1) analyzing publication outputs to understand trends over time; (2) performing scientific mapping through keyword analysis and evaluating the impact of significant publications; and (3) quantitatively assessing the maturity and application of ML and data analytics across various research fields. This structured approach facilitates a comprehensive examination of intelligent transportation research’s evolution and current state.
Figure 1.
Three-step approach flowchart for scientometric analysis.
2.1. Data Collection
The data source was restricted to the Web of Science (WoS) database. The decision to use a single data source, WoS, was driven by its assurance of bibliographic data completeness and uniformity, including detailed information on authors, affiliations, countries, and cited references, as well as by the prevention of duplication risks that could arise from using multiple databases [19,20,21].
The initial screening involved a comprehensive search of papers published up to February 2024 using the following Boolean search strategy: (“data analysis” OR “data science” OR “machine learning” OR “deep learning”) AND (“smart city” OR “smart urban” OR “transportation” OR “traffic”). This search yielded an initial set of 829 documents from the WoS database. When developing a Boolean search strategy, choose keywords carefully to ensure that they are highly relevant to the search target and avoid being too broad. Choosing these keywords would confine the retrieved articles to the scope of applying machine-learning or deep-learning techniques to transportation-related research topics.
To ensure the consistency and quality of the dataset, the manual screening and filtering phase restricted the document type to peer-reviewed journal articles. This decision stems from the recognition that journal articles typically represent the most prestigious and impactful forms of scholarly communication. Including other document types, such as “Proceedings Paper”, “Review”, “Editorial Material”, “Book Chapter”, and “Retracted Publication”, could compromise the consistency of the dataset and skew the analysis. After excluding non-relevant document types, 431 articles remained.
In addition, this review does not include other modes of transportation, such as rail, air, and water. While the concepts of ITS, information technology, and digital technology can be applied to various transportation modes, our focus is on road/land transportation. Limiting the scope of ITS to road/land transportation rather than including other modes such as rail, air, and water has several significant advantages. Focusing on a single mode of transportation allows for a greater concentration of resources, technology, and research, leading to a significant increase in specialization and operational efficiency in this sector. Concentrating solely on road/land transportation simplifies transportation management and operations, effectively reducing the complexity of cross-sector coordination. Due to its narrower scope, the implementation and updating process of ITS will be faster and more adaptable to new technological changes.
Further scrutiny of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of an additional 318 articles, primarily because their transportation modes were out of the scope of this review or they did not apply ML or DL techniques for intelligent transportation purposes. Ultimately, 113 articles that closely met the research criteria were selected. Comprehensive bibliographic data, including full records and cited references, were then retrieved for these selected articles.
2.2. Tools and Methods
This review uses scientometric econometric analysis and visualization techniques. The scientometric analysis presents research findings through visualization technology, making the data more intuitive and comprehensible. This approach aids researchers in identifying up-and-coming research topics and trends within the field. It also assists scientific institutions and governmental decision-makers in evaluating the effectiveness of research policies and allocating scientific resources.
Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer (1.6.20) [22,23] were used for tool selection. Microsoft Excel was used to map and visualize the thematic trends of the documents over time, providing insights into the literature’s developmental trajectory. VOSviewer was used to conduct scientometric analysis, focusing on the co-authorship analysis of researchers, countries, and organizations, and keyword co-occurrence analysis. The relationships among researchers, countries, and organizations, and the connections between keywords, are elucidated by visualizing the co-authorship and keyword-occurrence networks. This visualization facilitates a clearer understanding of the research field’s collaborative dynamics and thematic focus areas.
2.3. Findings
The findings from the scientometric analysis and visualization are qualitatively discussed, focusing on the development trends of the literature and co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence within the field. This approach systematically reviews and summarizes the evolution of the current knowledge base. A detailed examination is made of the application of ML and DL across various domains of intelligent transportation, offering insights from multiple perspectives. By analyzing these elements, the paper identifies and elaborates on the key trends and collaborations that characterize the current research landscape, providing a comprehensive overview of how these technologies are integrated into intelligent transportation systems.
3. Analysis and Findings
This section presents the analyses and findings of the literature regarding publication outputs, co-authorship, research cooperation, countries, organizations, and keyword co-occurrence.
3.1. Publication Outputs
The annual number of publications is a critical indicator of knowledge accumulation and the maturity of a specific research field [24,25]. As depicted in Figure 2, of the 113 publications reviewed, the number from 2015 to 2017 was relatively low, with only two articles comprising approximately 1.8% of the total publications in this field. From 2018 to 2021, the research activity in this domain intensified, and the number of published articles rose significantly to 34, representing 30.1% of the total. From January 2022 to February 2024, the volume of publications increased markedly, totaling 77, which accounts for 68.1% of the overall corpus.
Figure 2.
Annual publication trends from 2015 to 2024.
Overall, the trend analysis indicates that the number of publications has either increased or remained stable annually up to the search date of February 2024. The cumulative publishing trend line in Figure 2 illustrates a year-on-year increase in publications within this field. This trend suggests that the volume of publications will likely continue its upward trajectory in 2024 and beyond. The rapid expansion of publications highlights the growing breadth and interdisciplinarity of the intelligent transportation field, highlighting its potential as a fertile area for further development and exploration.
3.2. Co-Authorship
Tracing scientific collaboration patterns within a specific research field can facilitate access to expertise and enhance the breadth of knowledge. According to previous studies [4,24], these patterns can be effectively identified by analyzing co-authorship networks. Accordingly, the subsequent sub-sections detail the co-authorship networks among researchers, countries, and organizations, providing insights into the collaborative dynamics within the field.
3.2.1. Researcher Cooperation
Researchers are the architects of knowledge creation. Therefore, analyzing the complex cooperation among researchers can illuminate the characteristics of experts and pioneers in the field. An in-depth examination of their research and their social communication modes can elucidate the application areas of ML and DL within intelligent transportation. Utilizing 113 publications and the software tool VOSviewer, a visual representation of the collaboration network among researchers was constructed. For this analysis, the threshold is set to at least one document per author and at least 20 citations per author. Out of the 466 co-authors identified, 141 were selected for detailed analysis. In Figure 3, each node represents a different author, with links indicating collaborative relationships. The thickness of these links denotes the strength of collaboration, as measured by shared publications, while node size corresponds to each author’s publication volume. The color gradient of the nodes reflects the average publication year of the authors’ works.
Figure 3.
Co-authorship network for researchers.
Notably, leading researchers often form tightly knit research teams, resulting in several distinct cooperative networks. In terms of academic productivity and influence, Muhammad Adnan Khan emerges as the most cited author, with four academic works and 81 citations. Regarding active participation, researchers such as Nitin Goyal, Ning Zhang, and Wanjun Cheng stand out as dynamic contributors to recent publications in this domain.
3.2.2. Countries
Exploring international scientific cooperation is important for understanding the spatial distribution of publications and identifying key contributions in the field of ML and DL applications in intelligent transportation. VOSviewer generated a network of collaborative relationships between countries, as depicted in Figure 4. For this analysis, the threshold is set to at least one document per country and at least 20 citations per author. Consequently, out of 40 countries, only 22 met these criteria and were included in the analysis. In Figure 4, each country is represented by a node, with links between nodes indicating collaborative interactions. The thickness of these links denotes the strength of collaboration based on shared documents. Node size and color variations in Figure 4 follow the same scheme as Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Co-authorship network for countries.
As illustrated in Figure 4, unlike the more fragmented researchers’ network in Figure 3, the country networks are fully interconnected and have greater homogeneity. In terms of academic productivity and influence, China (48 publications, 521 citations), the United States (9 publications, 312 citations), and India (19 publications, 237 citations) stand out as the most prolific contributors, emphasizing their pivotal roles in advancing global research on ML and DL in intelligent transportation. Notably, India and South Korea are the most active contributors, with an average publication year of 2022 reflecting their dynamic engagement in this research area.
3.2.3. Organizations
Exploring scientific collaborations among organizations is important for sustaining future academic exchanges, optimizing funding allocation, and supporting research decision-making processes [24]. Utilizing VOSviewer, a network of collaborative relationships between organizations was constructed, as depicted in Figure 5. The network configuration—selection threshold, node size, and color changes—mirrors that of the national network analysis. For this analysis, the threshold is set to a minimum of one document per country and at least 20 citations per author. Out of 287 organizations, 94 met the criteria and were included in the analysis. Figure 5 highlights such significant contributors as the University of Macau (five publications, 117 citations), Dalian Polytechnic University (four publications, 70 citations), and the University of Florence (four publications, 78 citations) for their significant academic productivity.
Figure 5.
Co-authorship network for organizations.
In terms of research activity, Jiaquan University, Xi’an Jiaotong Liverpool University, and Zhongnan University of Economics and Law are identified as particularly active entities in this field, each with an average publication year of 2022. This indicates their dynamic involvement in the ongoing development of research in intelligent transportation.
3.3. Keyword Co-Occurrence
Keywords are concise phrases that encapsulate the core content or central concepts of publications. Analyzing keywords can reveal the primary interests and emerging topics within a specific research field [6]. The VOSviewer software generated a keyword co-occurrence network with a threshold of at least five occurrences per keyword. This process identified 110 keywords included in the analysis, as depicted in Figure 6. In this figure, each node represents a specific keyword, the links between nodes indicate the co-occurrence relationships of keywords, and the thicknesses of these links signify the strength of co-occurrence in mutual documents. The size and color variations of the nodes correspond to the frequency of the keywords and their respective clusters.
Figure 6.
Keyword co-occurrence network and clusters.
Figure 6 illustrates several high-frequency keywords such as “deep learning”, “smart city”, and “intelligent transportation”. This is partly due to the Boolean operators applied during the literature search. Given that DL is a subset of ML and intelligent transportation falls under the broader category of smart cities, the recurrent appearance of these terms is expected. The keyword co-occurrence network highlights several topics that have attracted extensive attention, including “intelligent transportation system”, “big data analysis”, “traffic flow prediction”, “security”, and “anomaly detection”. These topics form the theoretical foundation for analyzing the nine key up-and-coming research topics presented in Section 4.
The keyword clusters identified through the co-occurrence network analysis highlight distinct themes and technologies within the field of intelligent transportation.
Cluster #1 (red) is the largest cluster, encompassing 29 keywords. It focuses on the application of DL in traffic-flow prediction, utilizing various predictive tools and techniques, such as neural networks (NN), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and long short-term memory networks (LSTM).
Cluster #2 (green), comprising 23 keywords, addresses the integration of the Internet of Things (IoT), ML, and intelligent transportation systems. Security, privacy, service quality, routing, and monitoring are key aspects. The predominant tools and techniques involve IoT and NN.
Cluster #3 (blue) contains 22 keywords and emphasizes the role of data analysis and algorithms in intelligent transportation. This includes traffic-accident analysis, prediction, network security, and connectivity enhancements.
Cluster #4 (yellow), with 12 keywords, primarily focuses on the interplay between artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and intrusion detection systems.
Cluster #5 (light purple), with 11 keywords, is centered on using big-data analysis and data visualization in intelligent transportation systems, covering such applications as object detection, road traffic monitoring, security, and real-time systems.
Cluster #6 (light blue) and Cluster #7 (orange) are smaller clusters containing seven and six keywords, respectively, and they explore advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence, big-data analysis, edge computing, and fog computing. These clusters highlight the evolving technological landscape and its implications for intelligent transportation systems.
While the seven clusters identified in the keyword co-occurrence analysis are distinctly defined, they are not isolated entities. Instead, these clusters are intricately intertwined, with significant overlapping. This complex interconnection highlights the close relationships of the clusters and reveals the complexity of their inherent linkages and interactions. The presence of overlapping areas not only challenges researchers to reconsider the distinctiveness of each cluster but also offers a valuable opportunity for a deeper examination of the mutual influences and interactions between these clusters. This integrated approach highlights the interdisciplinary nature of the field and the multifaceted applications of ML and DL in intelligent transportation. To achieve clearer distinctions, nine specific application areas were identified as more representative during a thorough review of the article’s content and, therefore, needed to be separated.
4. Qualitative Discussion
This section outlines key insights regarding the application of ML and DL in intelligent transportation. The analysis of publication outputs reveals an upward trend in the number of annual documents, highlighting the growing interest in this domain as a promising area of research. This trend highlights the potential for ML and DL to address specific challenges within intelligent transportation.
To facilitate future research, this study uses rigorous scientific methods to systematically organize and summarize the development of the current knowledge base. This enables researchers and academics to further build upon prior work and explore their respective areas. Additionally, Table 1 presents a detailed examination of various types of ML and DL applications in intelligent transportation, providing a comprehensive overview that aids in selecting optimal solutions for specific problems within this field.
Table 1.
List of emerging ML and DL topics.
4.1. Traffic-Flow Prediction
In intelligent transportation systems, traffic-flow prediction plays an important role. Accurate predictions enable traffic-management authorities to effectively plan and adjust resources, such as signal control and traffic guidance strategies. Such forecasting is important to the functionality of smart-city systems and public safety. However, traffic-flow prediction remains a challenging task [26]. This section provides an overview of recent advancements in traffic-flow prediction.
Table 2 details the methods, innovations, data preprocessing techniques, empirical conclusions, limitations, and future research directions from various studies in traffic-flow prediction. Analysis of this table reveals the use of diverse methods, including SVM, BiGRU, LSTM, GCN, RNN, and GAN, to address traffic-flow prediction challenges. Innovations include noise data, integration of trust authority principles, and dynamic correlation enhancements. Various data preprocessing methods are used to improve model performance and accuracy, such as min–max normalization, data interpolation, and data cleaning and conversion. Most of these studies demonstrate that the proposed models or methods surpass existing technologies or baseline models in terms of empirical results.
Table 2.
Summary of the literature related to traffic-flow prediction.
Research into traffic-flow prediction systems continues to face several persistent constraints (e.g., data privacy regulations), risks (e.g., technology integration challenges), and issues (e.g., inconsistent interoperability). These include concerns over data quality and dataset limitations, models’ complexity and interpretability, models’ generalization and stability, hyperparameter tuning and automation, real-time and dynamic adaptability, and the need for cross-city and cross-domain prediction capabilities. Addressing these constraints, risks, and issues necessitates a concerted effort to enhance model interpretability and stability, improve data preprocessing techniques, develop more efficient hyperparameter optimization methods, and devise real-time and dynamic traffic-flow prediction strategies. Collaborative interdisciplinary research that integrates expertise from traffic engineering, computer science, and data science is needed to advance the field of traffic-flow prediction systems and promote their practical implementation.
4.2. Public Transportation
Public transportation, a critical component of smart cities, plays a vital role in urban mobility and is pivotal for transportation planning, resource allocation, and demand management. Innovative approaches, such as carpooling and crowdsourcing, have emerged to address these needs. Additionally, urban ride hailing, buses, and bicycle sharing represent the majority of research in this area.
Table 3 comprehensively summarizes the research methods, innovations, data preprocessing techniques, empirical findings, limitations, and future research directions across various studies. The subsequent analysis provides a detailed examination of these aspects. Numerous studies have leveraged advanced DL models, such as GCN, CNN, LSTM, RESNET, DNN, and Bi LSTM, to model complex spatiotemporal relationships. These models, augmented by effective feature engineering and nonlinear capabilities, predict passenger flows and single-vehicle demand. Some researchers have introduced innovative methods and models, including TBI, RF, and MVST-NET, to enhance traffic prediction and exploit the potential of shared travel, achieving significant predictive performance.
Table 3.
Summary of the literature related to public transportation.
Data preprocessing is a critical step in all research, involving data cleaning, matching, organization, and normalization to ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of model training and prediction. The empirical findings from these studies cover various applications, such as passenger-flow forecasting, shared travel potential exploration, and shared bicycle-demand prediction. Most studies report that the proposed methods outperform traditional approaches, demonstrating higher prediction accuracy and improved performance in practical applications.
4.3. Intelligent Traffic Data Transmission and Sharing
Traffic prediction is a critical application within smart cities, with accurate traffic information needed for effective traffic management. Various methodologies have been proposed to predict traffic flows using time-series data from traffic sensors.
Table 4 provides a detailed summary of the methods, innovations, data preprocessing techniques, empirical findings, limitations, and directions for future research across a series of studies. An analysis of this table reveals that various ML and DL models, such as logistic regression, ANN, DT, KNN, RF, RNN, GAN, SVM, and CNN, are used to address traffic-related issues. Some studies introduce novel models or methods, such as the ‘vehiclectron’ model for precise vehicle-count estimation on roads and a driver yawning detection method based on facial action recognition. The significance of data cleaning and transformation for enhancing model accuracy and stability is emphasized across many papers. Specific data standardization and normalization techniques, such as min–max normalization, are widely used. Many studies report on model accuracy and performance, with some decision-tree models achieving up to 71.44% accuracy, while other models have reached classification accuracies of 85%. Comparative analyses within these papers highlight that certain models excel in specific tasks.
Table 4.
Summary of the literature related to intelligent traffic data transmission and sharing.
Research in intelligent transportation systems faces several risks, issues, and constraints. First, the inconsistency in model selection and comparison across studies complicates the identification of the most effective models for specific tasks. Second, a lack of detailed discussion on data preprocessing and feature engineering can adversely affect the models’ accuracy and stability. The balance between model interpretability and accuracy, particularly with complex DL models, is also a critical consideration. Moreover, the validation and practical implementation of these methods in real-world smart-city environments are crucial for further research and development. Data privacy and security issues, particularly when handling large datasets, also need more rigorous research. Collaborative efforts across disciplines, focusing on sustainability and minimizing environmental impacts, are important for advancing research in intelligent transportation systems. Addressing these challenges will enrich the scope and depth of future studies in this field.
4.4. Intelligent Transportation System
The intelligent transportation system (ITS) forms the backbone of smart-city infrastructure, leveraging spatiotemporal traffic data to derive insights that are critical for intelligent transport dispatching and urban planning [9].
Table 5 provides a comprehensive summary of methods, research innovations, empirical findings, limitations, and future research directions across various studies in this field. An analysis of the table reveals extensive use of ML technologies, including LSTM, DT, RF, XGBoost, and CNN, often combined with DL to enhance ITS capabilities. The research innovations span several aspects of ITS, such as data analysis, traffic mode detection, path planning, traffic-flow estimation, and malicious traffic detection. These innovations offer fresh perspectives and approaches for ITS development. Many studies report high accuracy and low computational costs, demonstrating the methods’ effectiveness and efficiency in ITS applications. Some studies also highlight the beneficial impacts of ITS implementations on traffic efficiency and air quality.
Table 5.
Summary of the literature related to the intelligent transportation system.
Despite numerous advances, research and development challenges in the scope of ITS remain substantial. These include data privacy and security constraints and issues, algorithm interpretability, data quality and consistency, system integration and interoperability, and the practical application and sustainability of these systems. The key objectives for advancing ITS involve ensuring secure data storage and transmission, enhancing algorithm interpretability, maintaining high data quality and consistency, achieving effective system integration and interoperability, and promoting these technologies’ practical application and long-term sustainability. Addressing these challenges comprehensively requires a multidimensional approach that considers technological, policy, social, and economic factors, which are important for the continued development of smart cities and the effective management of ITS.
4.5. Intelligent Parking Systems
As urbanization accelerates, the surge in vehicle numbers has exacerbated parking difficulties, becoming a significant issue in urban traffic management. Efficient parking infrastructures can prevent, mitigate, and resolve these risks and issues by enabling the identification of available parking spaces, thus, reducing carbon emissions from excessive fuel combustion, decreasing wait times, and alleviating traffic congestion [102]. Intelligent parking systems are becoming indispensable in urban areas [103]. Leveraging technologies such as the Internet of Things and big data, these systems facilitate the real-time monitoring and management of parking spaces, optimize resource allocation, and reduce the time drivers spend searching for parking, enhancing urban traffic flow and operational efficiency.
Table 6 summarizes multiple research studies on intelligent parking systems, encompassing methods, innovations, empirical findings, limitations, and future research directions. An analysis of this table highlights several key insights:
Table 6.
Summary of the literature related to smart parking.
- diverse research methods: studies use various ML and DL techniques, including random forest (RF), CatBoost, LSTM, ANN, CNN, and SVM, supplemented with genetic algorithms and Bayesian regularized NN;
- varied innovative points: innovations use contextual data to predict parking utilization rates, integrate renewable energy sources for electric vehicle charging control, and improve intelligent parking rates through advanced DL;
- rich empirical conclusions: the results demonstrate that the proposed models and methods significantly enhance parking utilization rates, profitability, accuracy, and reliability.
Research on intelligent parking systems faces numerous constraints, risks, and issues, including data privacy and security, technical integration and interoperability, cost-effectiveness and sustainability, user experience and acceptance, and compatibility with urban planning and policy frameworks. The implementation of critical success factors includes safeguarding user data, effectively integrating diverse technologies, minimizing costs, enhancing user experiences, and ensuring alignment with broader urban-planning objectives. Additionally, focusing on sustainability, social inclusivity, data governance, and transparency is important for advancing the development and application of intelligent parking systems in urban settings. By addressing these challenges comprehensively, intelligent parking systems can more effectively meet urban transportation management needs and contribute to the development of smarter cities.
4.6. Traffic Congestion
Smart cities have been evolving for nearly a decade, with reducing traffic congestion remaining a critical focus of their development [113]. Traffic congestion, a pervasive issue in urban transportation systems, leads to significant fuel waste and increases in accidents, traffic jams, and driver frustration. Managing traffic delays, especially during rush hours in metropolitan areas, is crucial due to the high volume of vehicles involved.
Table 7 comprehensively reviews methods, innovations, empirical results, limitations, and future directions in traffic-congestion research. Researchers have used various approaches to address this issue, including remote sensing, DL, and neuro-fuzzy systems. Applications of these technologies include IoT integration and advanced analytics, such as deep Q-learning, which enhance congestion prediction and optimize traffic flow. Although empirical outcomes indicate improved prediction capabilities and reduced wait times under various conditions, the studies also reveal performance limitations, data quality, and scalability challenges. The table recommends further development of communication protocols and expanding algorithm applicability across broader road networks to advance ITS and address persistent research gaps.
Table 7.
Summary of the literature related to traffic congestion.
Research on traffic congestion encounters several issues and constraints. Data collection and privacy concerns are prominent due to the reliance on in-vehicle sensors or IoT devices, highlighting the necessity for stringent data compliance and privacy safeguards. Moreover, the accuracy and practical application of models based on DL and NN require validation in real-world traffic scenarios, taking into account external factors such as weather and road conditions. Additional obstacles include integrating these proposed methods effectively into current traffic management systems, ensuring their cost-effectiveness and gaining social acceptance. Future research should enhance the reliability, practicality, and societal acceptance of intelligent traffic management systems to realize effective intelligent transportation management.
4.7. Vehicle Detection and Tracking
Moving-object detection and tracking have recently emerged as research hotspots in satellite video processing and analysis. In traditional approaches, moving-object detection is treated as a problem of foreground and background segmentation [120].
Table 8 provides a comprehensive summary of research papers focused on vehicle detection and tracking, encompassing methods, innovations, data preprocessing techniques, empirical findings, limitations, and directions for future research. The analysis indicates that studies have applied various methods, such as KEF, SVM, LSTM, GCN, RNN, and GAN, to address challenges in traffic-flow prediction. Innovations include incorporating noise data, trusted authority principles, and dynamic correlation. Various data preprocessing techniques, such as min–max normalization, data interpolation, cleaning, and conversion, have enhanced model performance and accuracy. Most studies have shown promising empirical results, surpassing existing technologies or baseline models in traffic-flow prediction.
Table 8.
Summary of the literature related to vehicle detection and tracking.
While innovative methods have been introduced to improve the systems in the domain of research on vehicle detection and tracking systems, several challenges remain. Some studies primarily focus on novel algorithms and models but encounter difficulties with computational complexity and real-time performance. Despite the significant advances facilitated by such technologies as DL, practical applications often require substantial computational resources and time to process large-scale data, which may limit the systems’ practicality. Furthermore, while certain research performs well on specific datasets, the generalization ability across different environments or datasets needs further validation to ensure robust and safe vehicle detection and tracking systems operation. Future research should focus on enhancing the real-time capabilities of algorithms, improving generalization performance, and boosting system robustness to ensure more stable and reliable operation. By integrating sensor fusion, ML, and DL technologies, further improvements in system performance can be achieved, advancing the development of intelligent transportation systems.
4.8. Vehicle Identification and License Plate Number Recognition
In transportation and traffic management systems, vehicle recognition, particularly through reading license plates, is paramount [127]. Vehicle recognition involves the automatic identification of vehicles using computer-vision technology, which is extensively applied in traffic monitoring, intelligent parking management, and other areas. On the other hand, license plate number recognition focuses on the automatic detection and reading of vehicle license plates primarily through image processing and character recognition technologies.
Table 9 summarizes the research literature on intelligent parking systems, covering methods, innovations, empirical findings, limitations, and future research directions. An analysis of this data reveals (1) diversified research methods, where various studies have implemented different ML and DL techniques, such as the DLVLPNR model, RCNN, and deep active learning frameworks; (2) diversified innovation points, where innovations include using CNNs to capture and extract distinct vehicle features effectively, integrating Fast R-CNN with Extractive V2 and Tesseract OCR for enhanced license plate character recognition, and using memory space to aid active learning in vehicle-type recognition; and (3) abundant empirical conclusions, where the studies demonstrate that the proposed models or methods have yielded positive results, such as improved accuracy and reliability in empirical research.
Table 9.
Summary of the vehicle identification and license plate number recognition literature.
Research into vehicle and license plate recognition has advanced significantly in recent years, benefiting from the adoption of cutting-edge technologies and methodologies. However, issues persist, and areas for improvement remain. These include issues related to the quality and scale of datasets, the robustness of models against noise and lighting variations, the need for real-time performance and efficiency, and concerns over privacy and security. Additionally, the interpretability of DL models in these applications is important for building user trust and ensuring safety. Future research should concentrate on enhancing dataset quality, improving model robustness, optimizing real-time performance, addressing privacy and security concerns, and increasing model interpretability. Addressing these challenges will facilitate further advancements in vehicle and license plate recognition technologies, enhancing their effectiveness within intelligent transportation systems.
4.9. Traffic-Light and Streetlight System
With the evolution of smart cities, traffic-light control systems have become important for managing vehicle flow and addressing traffic congestion. A dynamic intelligent traffic-light control system (DITLCS) has been proposed, which dynamically adjusts traffic-light durations based on real-time traffic data [132].
Table 10 overviews recent advancements in traffic-signal and streetlight systems, highlighting innovative technological applications and key findings. These studies use various methodologies, such as reinforcement learning (RL) and Markov decision processes (MDP), to enhance the intelligence of traffic management systems.
Table 10.
Summary of the literature related to traffic-light and streetlight systems.
The intelligent traffic-signal system presented here offers significant potential for improving urban traffic management. However, its successful implementation faces several challenges. These include ensuring the real-time and accurate acquisition of traffic data, maintaining system stability across varying road conditions, balancing cost-effectiveness with technological sophistication, addressing privacy and security constraints and issues related to data collection, integrating the technology with the existing infrastructure and vehicle systems, and encouraging effective human–machine collaboration to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow. Addressing these constraints and issues is necessary for optimizing the system’s performance and realizing its potential to enhance the efficiency and safety of urban transportation.
5. Conclusions
This study reviews the recent intelligent transportation research trends in smart cities, examining the impact of machine learning and deep learning on traffic-flow prediction, congestion management, smart parking, public transportation, traffic accidents, and driver safety. It also discusses current research challenges and future trends in smart cities, emphasizing the critical role of these technologies in improving traffic flow and safety.
In terms of theoretical contribution, this study aims to analyze and visualize intelligent transportation characteristics using a broad scope and extended timeframe methodology. The analysis and evaluation use quantitative methods, enhancing objectivity and reliability. The findings are presented in tabular and graphical formats, such as network maps and information sheets, with narrative explanations to provide a clearer understanding of the literature’s social, conceptual, and intellectual structure. This approach allows for a comprehensive evaluation of intelligent transportation.
As a pivotal component of smart cities, the development of intelligent transportation is intricately linked to the future of the transportation industry. It has profound implications for urban management, environmental protection, and socio-economic development. Despite significant advancements, intelligent transportation systems (ITS) still encounter numerous issues and constraints. To function efficiently, these systems require integrating diverse technologies, such as the Internet of Things, big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence. Moreover, deploying various sensors and devices necessitates processing vast amounts of traffic data, which, in turn, demands robust data processing capabilities and efficient algorithmic support.
Furthermore, an ITS often involves handling extensive personal location and behavioral data, making data security and privacy protection critical. Additionally, these systems should encourage eco-friendly transportation modes to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Thus, the design and implementation of ITSs should consider their long-term environmental impacts to ensure the sustainable development of urban transportation.
Addressing the constraints, risks, and issues of technology integration, data processing, security and privacy, and environmental sustainability will be central to the future of intelligent transportation research. Key areas of focus will include:
- developing more sophisticated data processing algorithms and analysis models through the deep integration of big data and artificial intelligence to enhance traffic management and control;
- enhancing information security and privacy protection by innovating encryption technologies and anonymization methods to safeguard personal data;
- utilizing ML and other advanced technologies to improve the accuracy of traffic predictions, optimize traffic flow and accident prediction models, and facilitate more precise traffic decisions;
- pairing quantum technologies with AI to open new research, development, and implementation opportunities (e.g., combinatorial optimization);
- building cross-departmental data sharing and collaboration platforms to enhance overall efficiency and promote optimal information resource allocation;
- advancing the development of autonomous vehicle technologies, including autonomous navigation and safe obstacle avoidance systems, will be critical to driving the next wave of innovations in the transportation sector.
By focusing on these areas, future research can significantly advance intelligent transportation systems, encouraging revolutionary changes in the transportation industry and contributing to the broader goals of smart-city development.
Practically, the findings offer valuable insights for researchers, organizations, editorial boards, and practitioners, focusing on author collaboration, literature citations, keyword co-occurrence, and literature trend topic analysis, which can help identify collaboration opportunities and focus on promising research topics.
Despite its depth, this study has limitations due to its focus on the English literature, potential bias due to its reliance on the Web of Science database and the VOSviewer tool, and the subjective judgment of the author in selecting and interpreting the results. When interpreting the study’s results, these limitations should be considered to ensure a comprehensive understanding of intelligent transportation.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.Z., J.W., H.Z. and N.M.; methodology, J.Z., J.W., H.Z., N.M. and M.S.; validation, J.Z., J.W., H.Z., M.S. and Z.Q.; formal analysis, J.Z., J.W., H.Z. and N.M.; data curation, J.Z., H.Z. and Z.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Z., J.W., H.Z. and N.M.; writing—review and editing, M.S., Z.Q., G.S. and J.C.; visualization, J.Z., H.Z., N.M. and Z.Q.; supervision, J.W., M.S., G.S. and J.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation, grant number ZR2023QG168.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
| AM | Activation maximization |
| ANN | Artificial neural network |
| APY | Average year of publication |
| ARI | Adjusted rand index |
| ATM | Automatic topic modeling |
| BS | Batch size |
| BiGRU | Bidirectional gated recurrent unit |
| BOA | Butterfly optimization algorithm |
| BSP | Binary space partitioning |
| BSS | Blind source separation |
| BSVR | Bayesian support vector regression |
| BUC | Bottom-up clustering |
| CNN | Convolutional neural networks |
| CS | Citation score per author |
| CSTN | Continuous surface transition network |
| DAN | Deep adaptation network |
| DBN | Deep belief networks |
| DCRFNN | Dynamic convolutional recurrent fusion neural network |
| DL | Deep learning |
| DQN | Deep q-network |
| DT | Document type |
| EAI | Explainable artificial intelligence |
| EC | Evolutionary computation |
| EdRVFL | Enhanced random vector functional link |
| ELM | Extreme learning machine |
| FDA | Fisher discriminant analysis |
| FedSTN | Federated spatial transformer network |
| FL | Federated learning |
| GA | Genetic algorithm |
| GAN | Generative adversarial network |
| GAS | Gather-apply-scatter |
| GCN | Graph convolutional network |
| GCNN | Genetic convolutional neural network |
| GNN | Graph neural network |
| GRU | Gate recurrent unit |
| IDT | Intelligent data transform |
| IoT | Internet of Things |
| IRM | Invariant risk minimization |
| ITS | Intelligent transportation systems |
| KDE | Kernel density estimation |
| KNN | K-nearest neighbor |
| LR | Logistic regression |
| LSTM | Long short-term memory neural networks |
| MDN | Mixture density network |
| MDP | Markov decision process |
| ML | Machine learning |
| MLP | Multi-layer perceptron |
| MLR | Multiple linear regression |
| MMN | Mismatch negativity |
| MTLM | Multi-task learning model |
| MVSNET | Multi-view spatiotemporal network |
| NB | Naive bayes |
| NN | Neural networks |
| NP | Number of documents per author |
| POA | Probabilistic output analysis |
| POI | Point of interest |
| RBF | Radial basis function |
| RBM | Restricted Boltzmann machine |
| RCNN | Regions with convolutional neural networks |
| ResNet | Residual network |
| RF | Random forest |
| RNN | Recurrent neural network |
| SMO | Sequential minimal optimization |
| SVC | Support-vector classification |
| SVM | Support-vector machine |
| TBI | Target bearing indicator |
| TFP | Traffic-flow prediction |
| TMS | Traffic management systems |
| WoS | Web of Science |
References
- O’Dwyer, E.; Pan, I.; Acha, S.; Shah, N. Smart energy systems for sustainable smart cities: Current developments, trends and future directions. Appl. Energy 2019, 237, 581–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yang, C.; Jiang, L.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Y. Intelligent edge computing for IoT-based energy management in smart cities. IEEE Netw. 2019, 33, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renaud, J.; Karam, R.; Salomon, M.; Couturier, R. Deep learning and gradient boosting for urban environmental noise monitoring in smart cities. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 218, 119568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, D.; Xu, Z.; Pedrycz, W. Bibliometric analysis of rough sets research. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 94, 106467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravish, R.; Swamy, S.R. Intelligent traffic management: A review of challenges, solutions, and future perspectives. Transp. Telecommun. J. 2021, 22, 163–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, Z.; Shan, M.; Darko, A.; Le, Y. Visualizing the knowledge domain of project governance: A scientometric review. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020, 2020, 6813043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ateya, A.A.; Soliman, N.F.; Alkanhel, R.; Alhussan, A.A.; Muthanna, A.; Koucheryavy, A. Lightweight deep learning-based model for traffic prediction in fog-enabled dense deployed IOT networks. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 2023, 18, 2275–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, R.; Roul, R.K.; Batra, S. A hybrid deep learning CNN-ELM approach for parking space detection in Smart Cities. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 13665–13683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.A.; Nebel, J.C.; Khaddaj, S.; Brujic-Okretic, V. Scalable system for smart urban transport management. J. Adv. Transp. 2020, 2020, 8894705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, G.; Chen, Y. The application of virtual reality technology on intelligent traffic construction and decision support in smart cities. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2021, 2021, 3833562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riahi, Y.; Saikouk, T.; Gunasekaran, A.; Badraoui, I. Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain: A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 173, 114702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1382–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, H.N.; Lee, P.C. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics 2010, 85, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, M.R.; Martek, I.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Aibinu, A.A.; Arashpour, M.; Chileshe, N. Critical evaluation of off-site construction research: A Scientometric analysis. Autom. Constr. 2018, 87, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Hu, Y. A science mapping approach based review of model predictive control for smart building operation management. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2022, 28, 661–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, R.; Zou, P.X.; Piroozfar, P.; Wood, H.; Yang, Y.; Yan, L.; Han, Y. A science mapping approach based review of construction safety research. Saf. Sci. 2019, 113, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Li, M.; Skitmore, M.; Chen, J. Predicting Construction Company Insolvent Failure: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review of Research Trends. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, C.; Wang, J.; Qu, Z.; Skitmore, M.; Yi, J.; Sun, Z.; Chen, J. Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, K.; Wang, J.; Ashuri, B.; Chen, J. Discovering the Research Topics on Construction Safety and Health Using Semi-Supervised Topic Modeling. Buildings 2023, 13, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzouk, M.; Elhakeem, A.; Adel, K. Artificial Neural Networks Applications in Construction and Building Engineering (1991–2021): Science Mapping and Visualization. Appl. Soft Comput. 2023, 152, 111174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bornmann, L.; Thor, A.; Marx, W.; Schier, H. The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2016, 67, 2778–2789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Eck, N.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waltman, L.; Van Eck, N.J.; Noyons, E.C. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. J. Informetr. 2010, 4, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yevu, S.K.; Ann, T.W.; Darko, A. Digitalization of construction supply chain and procurement in the built environment: Emerging technologies and opportunities for sustainable processes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 322, 129093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhuri, P.K.; Shukla, A.K.; Janmaijaya, M.; Basu, A. Applied soft computing: A bibliometric analysis of the publications and citations during (2004–2016). Appl. Soft Comput. 2018, 69, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.; Lin, C.; Gao, W.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, G. Capsules TCN network for urban computing and intelligence in urban traffic prediction. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2020, 2020, 6896579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamza, M.A.; Alsolai, H.; Alzahrani, J.S.; Alamgeer, M.; Sayed, M.M.; Zamani, A.S.; Yaseen, I.; Motwakel, A. Intelligent Slime Mould Optimization with Deep Learning Enabled Traffic Prediction in Smart Cities. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 73, 6563–6577. [Google Scholar]
- Awan, F.M.; Minerva, R.; Crespi, N. Using noise pollution data for traffic prediction in smart cities: Experiments based on LSTM recurrent neural networks. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 20722–20729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Djenouri, Y.; Michalak, T.P.; Lin, J.C.W. Federated deep learning for smart city edge-based applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2023, 147, 350–359. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Bei, L.; An, Y.; Zhang, K.; Cui, P. A Hyperparameters automatic optimization method of time graph convolution network model for traffic prediction. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 4411–4419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, S.; Wei, C.; Song, C.; Pan, X.; Chang, W.; Yang, L. Short-term traffic flow prediction of the smart city using 5G internet of vehicles based on edge computing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 24, 2229–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, B.; Afzal, M.K.; Anjum, S.; Rao, I.; Kim, B.S. A Novel Graph Convolutional Gated Recurrent Unit Framework for Network-Based Traffic Prediction. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 130102–130118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, X.; Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, N.; Yang, T.; Han, T.; Taherkordi, A. Fedstn: Graph representation driven federated learning for edge computing enabled urban traffic flow prediction. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 24, 8738–8748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilotta, S.; Collini, E.; Nesi, P.; Pantaleo, G. Short-term prediction of city traffic flow via convolutional deep learning. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 113086–113099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, Y. Traffic Flow Prediction and Application of Smart City Based on Industry 4.0 and Big Data Analysis. Math. Probl. Eng. 2022, 2022, 5397861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, L.; Gao, R.; Suganthan, P.N.; Wang, D.Z. Graph ensemble deep random vector functional link network for traffic forecasting. Appl. Soft Comput. 2022, 131, 109809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vijayalakshmi, B.; Ramar, K.; Jhanjhi, N.Z.; Verma, S.; Kaliappan, M.; Vijayalakshmi, K.; Vimal, S.; Kavita Ghosh, U. An attention-based deep learning model for traffic flow prediction using spatiotemporal features towards sustainable smart city. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2021, 34, e4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Wen, N. A deep learning–based approach for moving vehicle counting and short-term traffic prediction from video images. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 905443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, Q.; Zhang, X.; Xie, W.; Zheng, K. An online-traffic-prediction based route finding mechanism for smart city. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 11, 970256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chawla, P.; Hasurkar, R.; Bogadi, C.R.; Korlapati, N.S.; Rajendran, R.; Ravichandran, S.; Tolem, S.C.; Gao, J.Z. Real-time traffic congestion prediction using big data and machine learning techniques. World J. Eng. 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Mao, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lü, X. An urban traffic flow fusion network based on a causal spatiotemporal graph convolution network. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.Y.; Sun, Q.W.; Zhao, Q.; Han, R.Z.; Chen, Y.H. Traffic Forecasting Based on Integration of Adaptive Subgraph Reformulation and Spatio-Temporal Deep Learning Model. Electronics 2022, 11, 861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Liu, L.; Wan, S.; Hui, X.; Pei, Q. Data dissemination for industry 4.0 applications in internet of vehicles based on short-term traffic prediction. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 2021, 22, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.U.; Shah, M.A.; Maple, C.; Ahmed, E.; Asghar, N. Traffic flow prediction: An intelligent scheme for forecasting traffic flow using air pollution data in smart cities with bagging ensemble. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, J.; Zhao, J. Construction of Dynamic Traffic Pattern Recognition and Prediction Model Based on Deep Learning in the Background of Intelligent Cities. IEEE Access 2023, 12, 1418–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, G.P.; Alasmari, N.; Alsolai, H.; Alotaibi, S.S.; Alotaibi, N.; Mohsen, H. Autonomous short-term traffic flow prediction using pelican optimization with hybrid deep belief network in smart cities. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almeida, A.; Brás, S.; Oliveira, I.; Sargento, S. Vehicular traffic flow prediction using deployed traffic counters in a city. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2022, 128, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, J.; Gong, Z. Cross-city multi-granular adaptive transfer learning for traffic flow prediction. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2022, 35, 11246–11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Chuai, G.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Si, Z.; Maimaiti, S. Dic-st: A hybrid prediction framework based on causal structure learning for cellular traffic and its application in urban computing. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.; Wu, S.; Huang, M. MmgFra: A multiscale multigraph learning framework for traffic prediction in smart cities. Earth Sci. Inform. 2023, 16, 2727–2739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, K.; Chen, X.; Wu, Q.; Yu, S.; Zhou, Z. Graph attention spatial-temporal network with collaborative global-local learning for citywide mobile traffic prediction. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2020, 21, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devadhas Sujakumari, P.; Dassan, P. Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) and HDFS-Based Realtime Traffic Forecasting System Using CCTV Surveillance. Symmetry 2023, 15, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Miao, H.; Li, J.; Cao, J. Spatio-temporal knowledge transfer for urban crowd flow prediction via deep attentive adaptation networks. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 23, 4695–4705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.; Chen, J.; Sun, J. A parallel spatiotemporal deep learning network for highway traffic flow forecasting. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2019, 15, 1550147719832792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismaeel, A.G.; Mary, J.; Chelliah, A.; Logeshwaran, J.; Mahmood, S.N.; Alani, S.; Shather, A.H. Enhancing Traffic Intelligence in Smart Cities Using Sustainable Deep Radial Function. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seng, K.P.; Ang, L.M.; Ngharamike, E.; Peter, E. Ridesharing and crowdsourcing for smart cities: Technologies, paradigms and use cases. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 18038–18081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Tao, S.; Yang, F. Urban ride-hailing demand prediction with multi-view information fusion deep learning framework. Appl. Intell. 2023, 53, 8879–8897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, X.; Xia, F.; Fu, Z.; Yan, X.; Tolba, A.; Almakhadmeh, Z. TBI2Flow: Travel behavioral inertia based long-term taxi passenger flow prediction. World Wide Web 2020, 23, 1381–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhanu, M.; Priya, S.; Moreira, J.M.; Chandra, J. ST-A GP: Spatio-Temporal aggregator predictor model for multi-step taxi-demand prediction in cities. Appl. Intell. 2023, 53, 2110–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Chen, J.; Li, W.; Song, X.; Shibasaki, R. Mobile phone GPS data in urban ride-sharing: An assessment method for emission reduction potential. Appl. Energy 2020, 269, 115038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, L.; Wang, Y.; Zou, F.; Bi, S.; Su, J.; Sun, Q. A multi-sensory stimulating attention model for cities’ taxi service demand prediction. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, T.; Shen, Z.; Cao, Y.; Xu, X.; Gong, H. Taxi-cruising recommendation via real-time information and historical trajectory data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 24, 7898–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajput, P.; Chaturvedi, M.; Patel, V. Opportunistic sensing based detection of crowdedness in public transport buses. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2020, 68, 101246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandal, R.; Karmakar, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Das Spandan, D.; Pradhan, S.; Saha, S.; Chakraborty, S.; Nandi, S. Exploiting multi-modal contextual sensing for city-bus’s stay location characterization: Towards sub-60 seconds accurate arrival time prediction. ACM Trans. Internet Things 2023, 4, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.P.; Chen, C.; Su, Z.C.; Chen, T.S.; Sumalee, A.; Pan, T.L.; Zhong, R.X. Bus arrival time prediction and reliability analysis: An experimental comparison of functional data analysis and Bayesian support vector regression. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 111, 107663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ning, W.; Tang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, T.; Liu, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, Z.; Shen, Q.; et al. CheetahVIS: A visual analytical system for large urban bus data. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020, 13, 2805–2808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prommaharaj, P.; Phithakkitnukoon, S.; Demissie, M.G.; Kattan, L.; Ratti, C. Visualizing public transit system operation with GTFS data: A case study of Calgary, Canada. Heliyon 2020, 6, e03729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Geng, M.; Zeng, J.; Yang, D.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X.M. A novel ensemble model with conditional intervening opportunities for ride-hailing travel mobility estimation. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2023, 628, 129167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, J.; Song, J.; Fan, H.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Guo, B.; Xu, Y. ST-Bikes: Predicting Travel-Behaviors of Sharing-Bikes Exploiting Urban Big Data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 24, 7676–7686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collini, E.; Nesi, P.; Pantaleo, G. Deep learning for short-term prediction of available bikes on bike-sharing stations. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 124337–124347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.H.; Lee, J.W.; Jung, Y. Practical method to improve usage efficiency of bike-sharing systems. ETRI J. 2022, 44, 244–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cagliero, L.; Cerquitelli, T.; Chiusano, S.; Garza, P.; Xiao, X. Predicting critical conditions in bicycle sharing systems. Computing 2017, 99, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, H.; Lu, Y.; Sze, N.N.; Li, H. Effect of dockless bike-sharing scheme on the demand for London Cycle Hire at the disaggregate level using a deep learning approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2022, 166, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Zhao, X.; Gong, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, N.; Wei, W. An attention-based deep learning framework for trip destination prediction of sharing bike. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 22, 4601–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohanta, B.K.; Jena, D.; Mohapatra, N.; Ramasubbareddy, S.; Rawal, B.S. Machine learning based accident prediction in secure IOT enable transportation system. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2022, 42, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Wang, W.; Huang, K.; De, S.; Coenen, F. Multi-modal generative adversarial networks for traffic event detection in smart cities. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 177, 114939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pourroostaei Ardakani, S.; Liang, X.; Mengistu, K.T.; So, R.S.; Wei, X.; He, B.; Cheshmehzangi, A. Road car accident prediction using a machine-learning-enabled data analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 5939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, N.; Cho, J.; Park, J. Assessing crash severity of urban roads with data mining techniques using big data from in-vehicle dashcam. Electron. Res. Arch. 2024, 32, 584–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altaf, I.; Kaul, A. Classifying victim degree of injury in road traffic accidents: A novel stacked DCL-X approach. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 66691–66723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Lei, D. Optimizing Internet of Things-Based Intelligent Transportation System’s Information Acquisition Using Deep Learning. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 11804–11810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Bashir, A.K. Graph-enabled intelligent vehicular network data processing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 4726–4735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noh, B.; Lin, T.; Lee, S.; Jeong, T. Deep Learning and Geometry Flow Vector Using Estimating Vehicle Cuboid Technology in a Monovision Environment. Sensors 2023, 23, 7504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, X. Research on the improvement of transportation efficiency of smart city by traffic visualization based on pattern recognition. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 2211–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gebremeskel, G.B. Leveraging big data analytics for intelligent transportation systems: Optimize the internet of vehicles data structure and modeling. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, J.; Jung, A.; Oh, C.; Park, J.; Yun, D. Evaluating Driving Safety of Road Alignment Conditions by Predicted Driver’s Psychophysiological Workload Using Vehicle Maneuvering Data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2024, 2678, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, E.; Kim, Y.; Lee, S.; Oh, C. Prediction of high-risk bus drivers characterized by aggressive driving behavior. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 2023, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Liu, L.; Min, W.; Yang, X.; Xiong, X. Driver yawning detection based on subtle facial action recognition. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 2020, 23, 572–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Nazir, S.; Ma, X.; Kong, S.; Liu, Y. Acquiring data traffic for sustainable IoT and smart devices using machine learning algorithm. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2021, 2021, 1852466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Shen, Y.; Hao, L.; Shang, W. Intelligent traffic data transmission and sharing based on optimal gradient adaptive optimization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 24, 13330–13340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiwari, P. The machine learning framework for traffic management in smart cities. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2024, 35, 445–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drosouli, I.; Voulodimos, A.; Miaoulis, G.; Mastorocostas, P.; Ghazanfarpour, D. Transportation mode detection using an optimized long short-term memory model on multimodal sensor data. Entropy 2021, 23, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rani, P.; Sharma, R. Intelligent transportation system for internet of vehicles based vehicular networks for smart cities. Comput. Electr. Eng. 2023, 105, 108543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiore, S.; Elia, D.; Pires, C.E.; Mestre, D.G.; Cappiello, C.; Vitali, M.; Andrade, N.; Braz, T.; Lezzi, D.; Moraes, R.; et al. An integrated big and fast data analytics platform for smart urban transportation management. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 117652–117677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M. Construction of regional intelligent transportation system in smart city road network via 5G network. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 24, 2208–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lilhore, U.K.; Imoize, A.L.; Li, C.T.; Simaiya, S.; Pani, S.K.; Goyal, N.; Kumar, A.; Lee, C.C. Design and implementation of an ML and IoT based adaptive traffic-management system for smart cities. Sensors 2022, 22, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vankdoth, S.R.; Arock, M. Deep intelligent transportation system for travel time estimation on spatio-temporal data. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 19117–19129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitchai, M.P.; Ramachandran, M.; Al-Turjman, F.; Mostarda, L. Intelligent framework for secure transportation systems using software-defined-Internet of Vehicles. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2021, 68, 3947–3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drosouli, I.; Voulodimos, A.; Mastorocostas, P.; Miaoulis, G.; Ghazanfarpour, D. A Spatial-Temporal Graph Convolutional Recurrent Network for Transportation Flow Estimation. Sensors 2023, 23, 7534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S.; Zhang, R.; Cheng, W.; Xu, J. Mtlm: A multi-task learning model for travel time estimation. GeoInformatica 2022, 26, 379–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lodan, K.T.; Khairina, E.; Dompak, T.; Salsabila, L.; Fathani, A.T. Readiness of the Batam City Government in implementing sustainable transportation. Masy. Kebud. Polit. 2023, 36, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hussaeni, K.; Fung, B.C.; Iqbal, F.; Dagher, G.G.; Park, E.G. SafePath: Differentially-private publishing of passenger trajectories in transportation systems. Comput. Netw. 2018, 143, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inam, S.; Mahmood, A.; Khatoon, S.; Alshamari, M.; Nawaz, N. Multisource data integration and comparative analysis of machine learning models for on-street parking prediction. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raj, A.; Shetty, S.D. Smart parking systems technologies, tools, and challenges for implementing in a smart city environment: A survey based on IoT & ML perspective. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2024, 15, 2673–2694. [Google Scholar]
- Jelen, G.; Podobnik, V.; Babic, J. Contextual prediction of parking spot availability: A step towards sustainable parking. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, X.; Gan, Q.; Shaker, M.P. Optimal management of parking lots as a big data for electric vehicles using internet of things and Long–Short term Memory. Energy 2023, 268, 126613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilotta, S.; Palesi, L.A.I.; Nesi, P. Predicting free parking slots via deep learning in short-mid terms explaining temporal impact of features. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 101678–101693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Li, X. Feasibility of Economic Forecasting Model Based on Intelligent Algorithm of Smart City. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2022, 2022, 9723190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canli, H.; Toklu, S. Deep learning-based mobile application design for smart parking. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 61171–61183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jakkaladiki, S.P.; Poulová, P.; Pražák, P.; Tesařová, B. Smart Parking System: Optimized Ensemble Deep Learning Model with Internet of Things for Smart Cities. Scalable Comput. Pract. Exp. 2023, 24, 1191–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badii, C.; Nesi, P.; Paoli, I. Predicting available parking slots on critical and regular services by exploiting a range of open data. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 44059–44071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Xue, H. Intelligent smart city parking facility layout optimization based on intelligent IoT analysis. Comput. Commun. 2020, 153, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, G.; Ali, T.; Irfan, M.; Draz, U.; Sohail, M.; Glowacz, A.; Sulowicz, M.; Mielnik, R.; Faheem, Z.B.; Martis, C. IoT based smart parking system using deep long short memory network. Electronics 2020, 9, 1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleem, M.; Abbas, S.; Ghazal, T.M.; Khan, M.A.; Sahawneh, N.; Ahmad, M. Smart cities: Fusion-based intelligent traffic congestion control system for vehicular networks using machine learning techniques. Egypt. Inform. J. 2022, 23, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blázquez, R.R.; Organero, M.M.; Fernández, L.S. Evaluation of outlier detection algorithms for traffic congestion assessment in smart city traffic data from vehicle sensors. Int. J. Heavy Veh. Syst. 2018, 25, 308–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddiqui, S.; Ahmad, I.; Khan, M.; Khan, B.; Ali, M.; Naseer, I.; Parveen, K.; Usama, H. AIoT enabled traffic congestion control system using deep neural network. EAI Endorsed Trans. Scalable Inf. Syst. 2021, 8, e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Sharma, N.V.K.; Chaurasiya, V.K. Adaptive traffic light control using deep reinforcement learning technique. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2024, 83, 13851–13872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gollapalli, M.; Musleh, D.; Ibrahim, N.; Khan, M.A.; Abbas, S.; Atta, A.; Khan, M.A.; Farooqui, M.; Iqbal, T.; Ahmed, M.S.; et al. A Neuro-Fuzzy Approach to Road Traffic Congestion Prediction. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 73, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, H. Sudden passenger flow characteristics and congestion control based on intelligent urban rail transit network. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022, 34, 6615–6624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, B.; He, Z.; Wu, Y.; He, J.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, L. Deep learning empowered traffic offloading in intelligent software defined cellular V2X networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 13328–13340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Zeng, D.; Jia, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Liang, Y.; Jiao, L. Cross-frame keypoint-based and spatial motion information-guided networks for moving vehicle detection and tracking in satellite videos. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2021, 177, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhajem, I.; Maissa, Y.B.; Tamtaoui, A. Improving low cost sensor based vehicle positioning with Machine Learning. Control Eng. Pract. 2018, 74, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Lu, Y.; Tong, G.; Shu, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, W. Watchdog: Real-time vehicle tracking on geo-distributed edge nodes. ACM Trans. Internet Things 2023, 4, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belhajem, I.; Maissa, Y.B.; Tamtaoui, A. Improving vehicle localization in a smart city with low cost sensor networks and support vector machines. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2018, 23, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López-Sastre, R.J.; Herranz-Perdiguero, C.; Guerrero-Gómez-Olmedo, R.; Oñoro-Rubio, D.; Maldonado-Bascón, S. Boosting multi-vehicle tracking with a joint object detection and viewpoint estimation sensor. Sensors 2019, 19, 4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuparu, D.G.; Ciobanu, R.I.; Dobre, C. Vehicle detection in overhead satellite images using a one-stage object detection model. Sensors 2020, 20, 6485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hassaballah, M.; Kenk, M.A.; Muhammad, K.; Minaee, S. Vehicle detection and tracking in adverse weather using a deep learning framework. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 22, 4230–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jesudoss, A. Entry and exit monitoring using license plate recognition. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials, Chennai, India, 2–4 August 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Trivedi, J.; Devi, M.S.; Dhara, D. Vehicle Classification Using the Convolution Neural Network Approach. Zeszyty Naukowe Transp./Politech. Śląska 2021, 112, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vetriselvi, T.; Lydia, E.L.; Mohanty, S.N.; Alabdulkreem, E.; Al-Otaibi, S.; Al-Rasheed, A.; Mansour, R.F. Deep learning based license plate number recognition for smart cities. CMC Comput. Mater Contin 2022, 70, 2049–2064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, P.; Singh, A.; Singh, K.K.; Dhull, A. Vehicle identification using modified region based convolution network for intelligent transportation system. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2022, 81, 34893–34917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, M.; Yu, X.; Ding, X. Cost-effective vehicle type recognition in surveillance images with deep active learning and web data. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 21, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, N.; Rahman, S.S.; Dhakad, N. Fuzzy inference enabled deep reinforcement learning-based traffic light control for intelligent transportation system. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 22, 4919–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, C.H.; Hwang, M.C. Value-based deep reinforcement learning for adaptive isolated intersection signal control. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 12, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maadi, S.; Stein, S.; Hong, J.; Murray-Smith, R. Real-time adaptive traffic signal control in a connected and automated vehicle environment: Optimisation of signal planning with reinforcement learning under vehicle speed guidance. Sensors 2022, 22, 7501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Z.; Yu, H.; Zhang, G.; Dong, S.; Xu, C.Z. Network-wide traffic signal control optimization using a multi-agent deep reinforcement learning. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2021, 125, 103059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).





