Next Article in Journal
Digitalisation of Manufacturing Systems: A Literature Review of Approaches to Assess the Sustainability of Digitalisation Technologies in Production Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Green Financial Policy, Resource Allocation and Corporate Environmental Responsibility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Shimamoto, M. Normative Corporate Income Tax with Rent for SDGs’ Funding: Case of the U.S. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3176

Faculty of Social Sciences, Hosei University, Aihara-cho 4342, Machida-shi, Tokyo 194-0298, Japan
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6274; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156274
Submission received: 10 July 2024 / Accepted: 12 July 2024 / Published: 23 July 2024
The author would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [1]. The changes are as follows:
(1)
Replacing the word “60%” with the word “55%” in “Abstract”, the second last sentence:
The corrected sentences appears below:
“The normative tax rates from 1982 to 2014 for these companies are stable at 40 to 55%, whereas corporate income tax has gradually decreased from 40% to less than 30%.”
(2)
Replacing the word “1.2” with the word “1.12” in “Section 2.3. Ingenuity to Apply Corporate Accounting Data to Production Functions for Calculation”, Paragraph 4 and should read:
“The calculation is performed by setting S to 1 (i.e., R = 1), and sensitivity analysis will be performed with S = 1.12, which can be regarded as the upper bound of induced returns to scale, as the return to scale in the U.S. in recent years was calculated to be 1.12 according to Boussemart et al. [45].”
(3)
Replacing the weblink in “Section 2.5. Data and Calculation”, Paragraph 1 and should read:
https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/ds22hpy629/3, accessed on 4 February 2023.”
(4)
Replacing the third sentence in “Section 3.1. Differences between Corporate Tax Rates and Normative Corporate Tax Rates”, Paragraph 1 and should read:
“The results show that the banking, insurance, water transportation, gas, electric, and sanitary services industries, and stone, clay, glass, and concrete have almost zero rents, while the rest of the industries, not only manufacturing but also services, have rents ranging from around 10% to as high as 20% of pre-tax profits on average over the 33-year period.”
(5)
Replacing the last sentence in “Section 3.2. Time Series of Corporate Tax Rate and Normative Corporate Tax Rate” , Paragraph 1 and should read:
“Based on the above, we can see that the normative corporate tax rate for the past 30 years has been stable at approximately 45%, with a slight upward trend since the 1990s, when S = 1.12.”
(6)
Replacing the first and the second last sentences in “Section 4.1. Key Findings and Policy Recommendations”, Paragraph 3 and should read:
“The average corporate income tax rate for these companies gradually dropped from 38.4% in 1982 to 27.7% in 2014 according to the data.”
and
“Obviously, the normative corporate income tax rate has remained flat at approximately 40% to 55%, depending on the values of parameters.”
(8)
Replacing the word “1.2” with the word “1.12” in “Section 4.2. Limitations and Future Prospects”, Paragraph 1 and should read:
“For the case of S = 1.12, rents were calculated for α 4 = 0.5 and 0.9, and sensitivity analysis was performed.”
(9)
The author would like to change all the numbers of the table content, so we need to replace the original Table 1 with the following Table 1:
Table 1. Corporate income tax including rent.
Table 1. Corporate income tax including rent.
S = 1S = 1.2 α4 = 0.5S = 1.2 α4 = 0.9
IndustryW3/TI(W3 + Rent)/TI(W3 + Rent)/TI(W3 + Rent)/TI
2 Mining0.3240.5120.4210.424
3 Construction0.3620.5630.4790.468
4 Food, tobacco0.3250.5000.4510.446
5 Textile, fabric, apparel0.3420.5320.4530.457
6 Lumber, furniture, paper0.3500.5150.4560.463
7 Printing, publishing0.1340.4200.3400.282
8 Chemical0.2900.4960.4540.452
9 Petroleum refining0.3370.6270.5240.485
10 Rubber, miscellaneous plastics0.3470.5890.5160.516
12 Stone, clay, glass, concrete0.2300.3080.3100.309
13 Primary metal0.3520.6090.5190.472
14 Fabricated metal products (except machinery, transportation equipment0.3100.5130.4330.438
15 Industrial, commercial machinery,
and computer equipment
0.2160.4250.3670.357
16 Electronic machinery except
computers
0.2980.4980.4340.427
17 Transportation equipment0.3100.4640.4160.412
18 Measuring, analyzing, controlling equipment0.3020.5090.4520.443
19 Miscellaneous manufacturing
industries
0.2660.4570.4380.440
20 Railroad, motor freight, postal
service, airline, transportation
0.3610.5140.4410.421
21 Water transportation, gas,
electric, sanitary services
0.3390.4420.4600.315
22 Communications0.3230.4440.4140.399
23 Wholesale trade0.3600.5350.4640.461
24 Retail trade0.3860.5920.5520.553
25 Banking0.3020.3600.3050.300
26 Insurance0.3460.5140.3750.340
28 Real estate0.2930.5290.4770.462
29 Health services0.3980.6200.5510.543
30 Business services0.3430.5670.5220.520
33 Public administration0.3540.6450.5900.531
Average0.318 0.511 0.450 0.433
Note: W3 = corporate income tax TI = profit before tax
rent = rent excluding monopoly rent of product markets
(10)
The author would like to change the fold lines in the picture, so we need to replace the original Figure 3 with the following Figure 3:
Figure 3. Time series of rent and corporate income tax.
Figure 3. Time series of rent and corporate income tax.
Sustainability 16 06274 g002
The author and the Editorial Office would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.

Reference

  1. Shimamoto, M. Normative Corporate Income Tax with Rent for SDGs’ Funding: Case of the U.S. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shimamoto, M. Correction: Shimamoto, M. Normative Corporate Income Tax with Rent for SDGs’ Funding: Case of the U.S. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3176. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156274

AMA Style

Shimamoto M. Correction: Shimamoto, M. Normative Corporate Income Tax with Rent for SDGs’ Funding: Case of the U.S. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3176. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156274

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shimamoto, Mihoko. 2024. "Correction: Shimamoto, M. Normative Corporate Income Tax with Rent for SDGs’ Funding: Case of the U.S. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3176" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156274

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop