Next Article in Journal
Integrated Assessment of Bearing Capacity and GHG Emissions for Foundation Treatment Piles Considering Stratum Variability
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Grass Typology in Diagnosing and Sustainably Managing Permanent Grasslands
Previous Article in Special Issue
Measurement of Systemic Risk in Global Financial Markets and Its Application in Forecasting Trading Decisions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Yun et al. A Novel Extended Higher-Order Moment Multi-Factor Framework for Forecasting the Carbon Price: Testing on the Multilayer Long Short-Term Memory Network. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1869

1
School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2
Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-Making, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230009, China
3
Department of Education and Literacy, Government of Sindh, Hyderabad 70060, Tando Jam, Pakistan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6318; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156318
Submission received: 18 March 2024 / Accepted: 22 May 2024 / Published: 24 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forecasting Financial Markets and Financial Crisis)
(1)
The authors wish to delete the expression of “where ⊗ means the Kronecker product and ⊕ means the XOR logic operation” throughout the entire paper.
(2)
The authors wish to replace the original Table 2 with a new Table 2 and modify some of the content presented in the original Table 2.
Correspondingly, in the research of Yun et al. (2020) [1], the original sentence in 4.2 “The results shown in Table 2 report that the best performance regarding RMSE and MAPE occurs with two hidden layers, because the values of RMSE and MAE are 0.13435 and 1.91017, respectively, which is the lowest value of the entire alternate hidden layer. Further analysis shows that there exists the smallest RMSE and MAE when the number of hidden layer nodes is 64, with the values of 0.1075 and 1.55172, respectively” should be replaced by the following sentence: “The results shown in Table 2 report that the best performance regarding RMSE and MAE occurs with two hidden layers, because the average errors of RMSE and MAE are 2.4050 and 1.7502, respectively, which is the lowest value of the entire alternate hidden layer. Further analysis shows that there exists the smallest RMSE and MAE when the number of hidden layer nodes is 64, with the values of 2.0421 and 1.4617, respectively”.
The new corrected Table 2 should be as follows:
Table 2. Effects of pricing factors on the performance of the Multi-LSTM: hidden layers and hidden nodes.
Table 2. Effects of pricing factors on the performance of the Multi-LSTM: hidden layers and hidden nodes.
Hidden-
Layer
NodesMulti-LSTM
(Under no Shock)
Multi-LSTM
(Under the Shock of Higher-Order
Moment)
Hidden-
Layer
NodesMulti-LSTM
(Under no Shock)
Multi-LSTM
(Under the Shock of Higher-Order
Moment)
RMSEMAERMSEMAERMSEMAERMSEMAE
142.60271.86422.30081.6883442.60541.86792.71102.0115
182.77381.98112.35111.7284482.80142.00802.57011.9251
1163.05492.25332.92322.15774163.13562.27922.89781.9707
1323.18122.33733.30082.39394322.96782.20512.24191.7047
1643.16722.39773.43792.22154642.95552.17672.18811.6140
11283.38092.55753.45742.386441282.70902.00792.09041.5173
Avg3.02682.23192.96192.0960 Avg2.86252.09082.44991.7906
242.56631.83232.17351.2996542.57401.86783.01842.2529
282.81622.02272.25391.8677582.82822.04902.58201.8255
2162.27802.18833.03302.31425162.95422.06892.66571.9784
2323.20032.17602.52241.80805322.99482.22832.58921.8557
2642.91102.07832.04211.46175642.92982.19212.24121.6505
21282.27261.79192.60111.913051282.76622.03392.01451.4680
Avg2.67412.01492.40501.7502 Avg2.84122.07342.51851.8385
342.59841.90292.17071.5650642.80802.11912.99812.2420
382.75671.97422.54071.8894682.89822.17022.90872.1699
3163.25012.33703.79992.61626163.09272.29612.91342.1647
3323.04802.27852.30511.69096323.14772.21862.74001.9495
3642.87282.08912.22691.60586642.85092.12342.17361.6301
31282.70092.02272.29001.674561282.70641.99322.15641.5960
Avg2.87122.10072.55551.8403 Avg2.91732.15342.64831.9587
Note: Bold numbers are the minimum root-mean-square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE).
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Yun, P.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Wagan, Z.A. A Novel Extended Higher-Order Moment Multi-Factor Framework for Forecasting the Carbon Price: Testing on the Multilayer Long Short-Term Memory Network. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yun, P.; Zhang, C.; Wu, Y.; Yang, X.; Wagan, Z.A. Correction: Yun et al. A Novel Extended Higher-Order Moment Multi-Factor Framework for Forecasting the Carbon Price: Testing on the Multilayer Long Short-Term Memory Network. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1869. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156318

AMA Style

Yun P, Zhang C, Wu Y, Yang X, Wagan ZA. Correction: Yun et al. A Novel Extended Higher-Order Moment Multi-Factor Framework for Forecasting the Carbon Price: Testing on the Multilayer Long Short-Term Memory Network. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1869. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yun, Po, Chen Zhang, Yaqi Wu, Xianzi Yang, and Zulfiqar Ali Wagan. 2024. "Correction: Yun et al. A Novel Extended Higher-Order Moment Multi-Factor Framework for Forecasting the Carbon Price: Testing on the Multilayer Long Short-Term Memory Network. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1869" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop