Next Article in Journal
The Impacts of Centralized Control on Mixed Traffic Network Performance: A Strategic Games Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
The Importance of Green Investments in Developed Economies—MCDM Models for Achieving Adequate Green Investments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biosorption of Cd(II), Co(II), and Cu(II) onto Microalgae under Acidic and Neutral Conditions

School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6342; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156342
Submission received: 24 May 2024 / Revised: 14 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 24 July 2024

Abstract

:
The biosorption of Cd, Co, and Cu onto three microalgae species (Chlorella vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and Spirulina platensis) was compared to determine the microalgae’s capability for heavy metal adsorption in acidic and neutral environments. The Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm models were used to characterize the adsorption of the heavy metals onto microalgae. The maximum adsorption capacity (qmax) determined using the Langmuir and D-R model showed results in the order of Cu > Co > Cd in both acidic and neutral conditions. A shift from acidic to neutral conditions increased the microalgae’s adsorption affinity for heavy metals, as determined using the Freundlich parameter (KF). The adsorption affinity of the biomass for Cd and Co was in the order S. platensis > C. vulgaris > Scenedesmus sp. while that of Cu was in the order C. vulgaris > Scenedesmus sp. > S. platensis. In addition, it was found that the adsorption of Cd and Co enhanced the production of Dissolved Organic Content (DOC) as a byproduct of biosorption, whereas the adsorption of Cu appeared to suppress the generation of DOC. The mean adsorption energy (E) values computed by the D-R model were less than 8 (kJ/mol), indicating that physisorption was the primary force of sorption in both acidic and neutral settings. The findings of this study suggest that microalgae may be used as a low-cost adsorbent for metal removal from industrial effluent.

1. Introduction

Heavy metals are elements with high atomic weights and densities that are at least five times greater than that of water [1]. They are naturally present in soils in small amounts; however, their excessive accumulation can degrade soil quality and harm surface plants [2]. Due to the increasing awareness of the detrimental impacts of global warming on the environment, there has been a global initiative to implement significant reforms in the transportation and energy sectors. Over the past decade, the worldwide proportion of new passenger electric vehicles (EVs) has surged, growing by approximately 50% annually [3]. Furthermore, the energy sector has undergone substantial transformations, marked by the expansion of solar and wind energy plants [4,5], both reliant on batteries for efficient energy storage. Consequently, there has been a heightened demand for Cadmium (Cd), Cobalt (Co), and Copper (Cu) to manufacture EV batteries, as well as storage systems for solar and wind energy. Cd finds widespread use in rechargeable batteries [6,7], particularly in Nickel-Cadmium (Ni-Cd) batteries, commonly employed in accessories like phones, laptops, and other durable devices. Co is a key component in the production of EV batteries [8,9], while Cu is commonly utilized in the construction of wires for current circulation in both EVs and power plants [10]. The rising demand for these metals has resulted in their accumulation in wastewater. The adverse effects of heavy metals encompass water source contamination, toxicity to aquatic life, and bioaccumulation in the food chain, which pose significant health risks to humans and wildlife [2,11].
Significantly, these metal deposits are often concentrated in economically developing nations [12], including the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Peru, Zambia, and Indonesia. Undertaking the removal of metal ions from mine effluents poses an economic challenge for these countries, given the limitations of conventional methods such as reverse osmosis, electro-dialysis, solvent extraction, and the like. Consequently, the extraction of these minerals frequently results in the inadequate treatment of mine effluents, leading to their improper disposal and eventual contamination of surface waters [13,14,15,16,17]. The consumption of water contaminated with heavy metals has been associated with various diseases, including Sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, muscular dystrophy, and cardiovascular diseases [18]. To mitigate the occurrence of such illnesses, it is crucial to explore cost-effective metal removal techniques that can be easily implemented on a small scale by members of local communities facing water pollution issues due to mining activities.
Adsorption is the process of removing molecules or ions from a gas or liquid by binding them to the surface of another substance. The attached molecule or ion is referred to as the adsorbate, while the surface to which they adhere is the adsorbent. Adsorption serves as a cost-effective alternative to traditional methods of metal removal from wastewater, given the versatility of potential adsorbents spanning from materials such as corncob, coffee beans, rice husks, stone powders, and even microorganisms like microalgae [19,20,21,22]. Compared to traditional physiochemical methods of heavy metal removal, microbial remediation is recognized as an effective and eco-friendly approach. It offers several advantages including high efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and minimal environmental impact [11,23,24].
Microalgae, unicellular microorganisms utilizing light energy and carbon dioxide for development, prove to be effective adsorbents due to their ease of cultivation and multifunctional capabilities. Microalgae not only adsorb molecules but also contribute to carbon dioxide consumption and the utilization of agricultural byproducts like phosphorous and nitrogen [25]. Despite their advantageous features, microalgae pose a growing national water threat in many developing nations due to algal blooming and eutrophication [26]. Elevated concentrations of microalgae can lead to oxygen depletion in water bodies, causing harm to aquatic life, including the death of fish. However, repurposing microalgae as adsorbents transforms this potential environmental threat into a valuable resource.
While various studies have explored heavy metal adsorption using microalgae [22,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], these investigations often focused on specific pH conditions—either acidic, neutral, or alkaline. For instance, Aksu et al. [28] examined Cd adsorption onto C. vulgaris at pH 4, reporting the maximum adsorbed concentration (qmax) of 770.4 mmol/kg. Hockaday et al. [34] studied the adsorption of Cd and Cu onto biomass at pH 6, obtaining qmax values of 98.4 mmol/kg for Cd and 400.2 mmol/kg for Cu with C. vulgaris, and qmax values of 219.90 mmol/kg for Cd and 152.6 mmol/kg for Cu with S. obliquus. Additionally, Bordoloi et al. [35] investigated Co adsorption by microalgae-based biochar at pH 5, yielding a qmax value of 11.4 mmol/kg. Given the significant impact of pH on heavy metal adsorption by microalgae, influencing the charge density of the cell wall and functional groups on cell surfaces, there is a need to characterize heavy metal adsorption mechanisms across different pH values.
This study aims to build upon prior research on heavy metal adsorption by characterizing the adsorption mechanisms of Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ onto three prevalent microalgae strains (C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis) under both acidic (pH 4) and neutral (pH 7) conditions. Utilizing the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich Isotherm models, the objective is to enhance understanding of the differences in sorption mechanisms among the three microalgae strains for these cations. The inclusion of both acidic (pH 4 in this study) and neutral (pH 7) environments is crucial to account for potential Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) in effluent exposed to sulfur-enriched rocks, as well as instances where rocks lack acid-forming minerals [36].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cultivation of Microalgae

Isolated species of C. vulgaris (KTC No. AG10052), Scenedesmus sp. (KTC No. AG20456), and S. platensis (KTC No. AG608369) were purchased from the Korean Collection for Type Cultures. C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp. were cultivated using Blue-Green 11 (BG-11) growth medium, which comprises NaNO₃, K₂HPO₄·3H₂O, MgSO₄·7H₂O, CaCl₂·2H₂O, citric acid, ferric ammonium citrate, Na₂CO₃, and a trace metal mix containing H₃BO₃, MnCl₂·4H₂O, ZnSO₄·7H₂O, Na₂MoO₄·2H₂O, CuSO₄·5H₂O, and Co(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, while S. platensis was cultured using Spirulina–Ogawa–Terui (SOT) growth medium, which comprises NaHCO₃, Na₂CO₃, NaNO₃, K₂HPO₄, K₂SO₄, NaCl, MgSO₄·7H₂O, CaCl₂·2H₂O, and a trace metal solution containing FeSO₄·7H₂O and EDTA. The microalgae strains were nurtured in photo batch reactors (PBRs) with LED strips as the light source. The LED lights were adjusted to provide continuous illumination for only 12 h each day, allowing the microalgae strains to undergo both light and dark cycles of biomass growth. The batch reactors were operated at 20 °C and continuous aeration was provided to the biomass through aeration tubes with high-efficiency particulate air filters.

2.2. Recovery and Processing of Biomass

After approximately 35 days of cultivation, the microalgae were harvested and dewatered using a centrifuge (UNION 32R PLUS, Hanil Science Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea). To prevent lipid expulsion from the biomass, C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp. underwent centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min, while S. platensis was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 8 min in 250 mL centrifuge tubes at 18 °C. The dewatered biomass was then washed with deionized water and dewatered again. This process was repeated three times to eliminate minerals from the growth media in the biomass. The dewatered biomass was freeze-dried at <20 Pa and −80 °C for 12 h using a freeze-dryer (Yamato scientific freeze-dryer, Tokyo, Japan). Following the freeze-drying, the biomass was ground using a motor and pestle and sieved through a 212-micron test sieve. The residue on the sieve was ground again, and the procedure was repeated until all the biomass was crushed to 0.212 mm or smaller.

2.3. FT-IR Characterisation of Biomass

Surface functional groups of the biomass were characterized using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry (Bruker Equinox 55 FT-IR spectrometer, Berlin, Germany) that was outfitted with a deuterated triglycerine sulfate detector and an HTS-XT high-throughput microplate extension. The spectral range covered was from 4000 to 400 cm−1, with each spectrum being an average of four co-added scans.

2.4. Preparation of Stock Solution

Cd(NO3)2·4H2O, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, and CuSO4·5H2O were dissolved in deionized water to prepare 2000 mg/L Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ stock solutions, respectively. The stock solutions were further diluted to the desired concentrations for subsequent experiments.

2.5. Biosorption Experiments

Biosorption isotherm experiments were carried out in 50 mL polycarbonate vials (Nalgene Co., Rochester, NY, USA). Each vial contained 0.05 g of biomass measured gravimetrically and was filled with about 50 mL of metal solution without head space to minimize unexpected oxidation. The pH of the solution was adjusted to pH4 and pH7 for acidic and neutral conditions, respectively, using HNO3 and NaOH. The initial concentration of the metal solutions was set from 0.24 to 1.8 mmol/L for Cd2+, from 0.42 to 3.45 mmol/L for Co2+, and from 0.39 to 3.25 mmol/L for Cu2+.
The pH edge experiment was also conducted to determine the influence of pH on the metal adsorption at a pH range from 4 to 9.5 in the metal solution with metal concentrations of 0.44, 0.85, and 0.81 mmol/L for Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+, respectively. The vials containing the mixture of biomass and metal solution were tightly capped and shaken in an orbital shaker at 120 rpm for 24 h. After mixing, the vials were centrifuged and filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter (Whatman, cellulose nitrate membrane filter) for analysis. The amount of metal ion (mmol/kg) adsorbed onto the biomass was calculated using the formula below:
q e = ( C 0 C e ) V W
where C0 and Ce represent the initial and the equilibrium metal concentrations (mmol/L) after 24 h of shaking, respectively. qe (mmol/kg) describes the adsorbed concentration in biomass. V represents the sample volume (L), and W represents the weight of the biomass (kg). All experiments were carried out in duplicate.

2.6. Analytic Methods

The metal concentration in the aqueous phase was measured using capillary electrophoresis (PrinCE-760, Emmen, The Netherlands), operated in the indirect capillary zone electrophoresis method (Indirect CZE). Briefly, the samples were injected into a 30 cm long silica fused capillary with a detector window at 22 cm for 6 s at 25 millibars. Thereafter, a separation voltage of 30 V was applied between the two ends of the capillary, and an analysis was run for 3 min. The buffer solution used 30 mM of glycolic acid and 10 mM of benzylamine [37].

2.7. Biosorption Isotherm Models

The Langmuir isotherm model is employed to describe the adsorption of solutes onto an adsorbent with a finite number of adsorption sites. This model assumes monolayer adsorption and a constant heat of adsorption for all the adsorption sites. The Langmuir model is written as:
q e = q m L b L C e 1 + b L C e
where qmL (mmol/kg) describes the maximum adsorption capacity, bL describes the Langmuir constant associated with site energy, and Ce (mmol/L) represents the equilibrium of heavy metal in the solution [21,22].
The Freundlich model assumes heterogeneity and exponential distribution of energy and adsorption sites. The Freundlich model is written as:
q e = K F C e N F
where KF [(mmol/kg)/(mmol/L)NF] denotes the Freundlich sorption coefficient, Ce (mmol/L) represents the equilibrium concentration of the heavy metal post-adsorption, and NF denotes the Freundlich exponent [22,38].
The Dubinin–Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm model [39] is used to describe the sorption of molecules onto microporous surfaces. The D-R model is written as:
q e = q m D exp ( β ε 2 ) = q m D exp β ( R T ln ( 1 + 1 C e ) ) 2
where qmD (mmol/kg) describes the maximum adsorption capacity, ß represents the activity coefficient of the sorption energy in the form (mol2/J2), ε is the Polanyi potential, R is the gas constant taken at a value of (8.314 J/mol/K), and T denotes the temperature in kelvins (K) [38].
ε = R T ln 1 + 1 C
E = 1 2 β
where E is the energy of sorption as described in the D-R isotherm model.

2.8. Determination of the Point of Zero Charge (pHpzc)

To determine the pHpzc, 0.02 g of each biomass species was mixed with 50 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaCl solution. The initial pH (pHi) of the solution was adjusted to values ranging from 2 to 12 in separate vials. After 48 h of mixing, the final pH (pHf) of each vial was measured [22].

2.9. Determination of DOC

To ascertain the amount of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) generated by the biomass, samples from the batch reactors in each experiment were filtered. The concentration of DOC in the filtered solution was then assessed at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h using a total organic carbon analyzer (TOC-L, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of pH on the Adsorption of Heavy Metals by Biomass

In Figure 1, the results are depicted concerning the point of zero charge (pHpzc). It was observed that the pHpzc of C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis were approximately 6.96, 6.80, and 6.99, respectively. Previous studies have indicated that at pH levels below pHpzc, the functional groups on the surface of biomass are tightly bound with the H3O+ ions in the aqueous solution [22]. However, as the pH surpasses the pHpzc, the outer layer of the biomass undergoes deprotonation, exposing the negatively charged functional groups [40,41,42]. The exposed functional groups can then interact with heavy metals, facilitating the formation of bonds [22].
Furthermore, as depicted in Figure 2, the adsorption of heavy metals onto C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis showed a dependence on pH. Increasing pH led to an increase in the adsorption capacity of the biomass for Cd, Co, and Cu. This effect can be attributed to higher concentrations of H3O+ ions in the aqueous solution at lower pH levels, which compete with heavy metal cations for available adsorption sites, consequently limiting the number of unoccupied adsorption sites on the biomass surfaces [43]. As the pH transition from acidic to alkaline, the concentration of hydronium ions in the solution decreases, reducing competition for adsorption sites. Additionally, it was noted that at pH values above 9.5, 9.0, and 7.5, precipitation, rather than adsorption, became the predominant removal mechanism for Cd, Co, and Cu, respectively.

3.2. FTIR Spectra

The FTIR spectrum of the microalgae is illustrated in Figure 3. The band near 3300 cm−1 is attributed to the N-H stretching vibrations in amides related to proteins and the O-H stretching in water [44]. The region between 2800 cm−1 and 3000 cm−1 is indicative of the stretching vibrations of aliphatic C-H groups found in lipids and proteins, as well as the asymmetric stretching of aldehydes [45]. The band at 1650 cm−1 corresponds to the C=O stretching vibrations in protein-associated amides [44]. The peak at 1527 cm−1 is due to the C-N and N-H stretching vibrations in proteins, whereas the peak at 1470 cm−1 is associated with C=C stretching [44]. After adsorption, slight changes were observed for all three strains of microalgae, between wavenumbers corresponding to the O-H groups, the amine and amide groups, carboxyl functional groups, and C-O vibrations in the hydroxyl groups.
The spectra provide insight into the functional groups involved in the biosorption process. For instance, the intensity and position of the O-H and carboxyl group peaks showed noticeable shifts, indicating their involvement in the biosorption process. Specifically, the peak corresponding to the O-H stretching vibration showed a slight shift in all three strains of biomass after adsorption, suggesting interactions between the metal ions and hydroxyl groups on the biomass surface. These spectral changes imply the formation of metal–oxygen and metal–nitrogen bonds, corroborating the involvement of hydroxyl, carboxyl, and amine groups in the metal binding process. The shifts in wavenumber and changes in peak intensity confirm that functional groups on the biomass surface play a crucial role in the adsorption of heavy metals.

3.3. Biosorption under Acidic Conditions

The adsorption data of Cd, Co, and Cu exhibited good fits (0.87 < R2 < 0.99) across all isotherm models tested with C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis under acidic conditions. Figure 4 and Table 1 show the biosorption isotherms and sorption parameters of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris under acidic conditions, respectively. The adsorption of metal ions onto biomass was analyzed using the Langmuir model [42,43], which assumes monolayer adsorption on homogeneous surfaces. The determination coefficient (R2) values for Cd, Co, and Cu obtained from the Langmuir model exceeded those from the Freundlich model, indicating that the sorption of the cations onto C. vulgaris under acidic conditions was predominantly homogenous. The Langmuir model estimated the maximum adsorption capacity (qmL) for C. vulgaris in the following order: Co (2172 mmol/kg) > Cu (1917 mmol/kg) > Cd (1175 mmol/kg). The RL parameter of the Langmuir model indicates the favorability of adsorption. It encompasses various scenarios: unfavorability (RL > 1), linearity (RL = 1), and favorability (0 < RL < 1) [38]. In this study, the RL values were computed at the maximum initial concentration, and all produced values were consistent with RL < 1, indicating that the sorption of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris under acidic conditions was favorable.
The Freundlich model has been also employed to describe the sorption of cations onto biomass [34]. It incorporates the heterogeneity of the adsorbent and the exponential distribution of the active sites and their corresponding energies. The KF values in the Freundlich model describe the adsorption affinity of the adsorbent for the sorbent. As depicted in Table 1, the KF values for C. vulgaris under acidic conditions followed the order Cu (609.8 mmol1-NLN/kg) > Co (483.7 mmol1-NLN/kg) > Cd (439.8 mmol1-NLN/kg).
The D-R model is mostly utilized for characterizing the sorption of molecules and ions onto microporous surfaces [38]. While some researchers have applied the D-R model to elucidate cation adsorption onto microalgae, most researchers have focused on the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models. However, studies that employed the D-R model to fit their isotherm data revealed that this model could indeed be used to describe the adsorption of metal ions onto biomass [33]. One advantage that the D-R model offers over the Langmuir and Freundlich models is that it provides an estimate of the sorption energy (E), which may be used to predict the mechanisms involved in adsorption. When E is between 8 kJ/mol and 16 kJ/mol, the sorption mechanism is predominantly ion exchange; when E is less than 8 kJ/mol, the sorption mechanism is predominantly physical in nature; moreover, when E is greater than 16 kJ/mol, the sorption mechanism is described as chemical sorption. As presented in Table 1, it was observed that the sorption mechanism involved in the adsorption of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris under acidic conditions is predominantly physical in nature. Studies have demonstrated that physical sorption mainly occurs due to weak van der Waals forces [38]. The qmD parameter of the D-R model may also be used to describe the maximum adsorption capacity (qmax) of the metal ions onto biomass. The qmax values of C. vulgaris for Cd, Co, and Cu are 648 mmol/kg, 1383 mmol/kg, and 1347 mmol/kg, respectively.
As observed in Table 1, there was a discrepancy between the qmD and qmL values. This difference is attributed to the fact that the Langmuir model considers the adsorption of metal ions onto the monolayer surface of the biomass to compute the qmL, while the D-R model computes the qmD by considering the amount of heavy metal ions adsorbed into the micro-pores of the biomass [46]. The determination coefficients (R2) of the Langmuir and the D-R model for each metal were compared to determine which isotherm model provided a more accurate estimate of the actual maximum adsorption capacity (qmax).
The relatively high R2 values obtained using the D-R model in this study were explained by the fact that microalgae cell walls have a fibrillary and amorphous structure, resulting in a sandy-like structure [33].
Figure 5 and Table 2 show the biosorption isotherms and sorption parameters of Cd, Co, and Cu onto Scenedesmus sp. under acidic conditions, respectively. The maximum adsorption capacity values (qmL) obtained from the Langmuir model were in the order Co (2182 mmol/kg) > Cu (2070 mmol/kg) > Cd (1027 mmol/kg). Although both the D-R model and the Langmuir model yielded the maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbed metal ions onto Scenedesmus sp. in the same order from highest to lowest (Co2+ > Cu2+ > Cd2+), the D-R model estimated the amount of metal ions adsorbed to be 593 mmol/kg, 1398 mmol/kg, and 1474 mmol/kg for Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+, respectively. It was observed that the adsorption isotherms of Co2+ and Cu2+ were better fitted with the D-R model with R2 values of 0.97 for Co and 0.95 for Cu, compared to 0.90 for Co and 0.92 for Cu with the Langmuir model. It was, therefore, assumed that the qmD parameter provided a more accurate estimate of the actual maximum adsorption capacity of Co and Cu onto Scenedesmus sp. under acidic conditions.
The higher the value of the Langmuir model parameter bL, the more the adsorbent surface is coated with firmly attached sorbate molecules. In this study, the bL parameters showed that, in acidic conditions, Cd ions were more tightly attached to Scenedesmus sp. biomass than Cu and Co cations. As presented in Table 2, the KF parameters described the sorption affinity of the cations towards Scenedesmus sp. to be in the order of Cu > Co > Cd, and this was the same order observed with C. vulgaris under acidic conditions. The Freundlich model described favorable sorption of Cd, Co, and Cu onto Scenedesmus sp., with N values in the range of 0.1 < 1/N < 1. This was consistent with the Langmuir isotherm model, which also described favorable sorption for all the examined cations onto Scenedesmus sp. with RL values corresponding to 0 < RL < 1. The sorption energy of Cd, Co, and Cu, as obtained using the D-R model, was 6.178 kJ/mol, 3.609 kJ/mol, and 3.894 kJ/mol, respectively. These findings showed that the sorption of the studied cations onto Scenedesmus sp. Under acidic circumstances is mostly physisorption.
Figure 6 and Table 3 show the biosorption isotherms and sorption parameters of Cd, Co, and Cu onto S. platensis under acidic conditions, respectively. According to the qmL parameters, the maximum sorption capacity of the metal ions onto S. platensis was 1034 mmol/kg, 1768 mmol/kg, and 3503 mmol/kg for Cd, Co, and Cu, respectively. On the other hand, the qmD parameter estimated the maximum adsorption capacity to be 639 mmol/kg for Cd, 1359 mmol/kg for Co, and 1754 mmol/kg for Cu. With the exception of Cu, the adsorption isotherms were better fitted with the Langmuir model. The sorption energies of all the cations were less than 8 kJ/mol, indicating that physical sorption was the primary sorption process involved in cation sorption onto S. platensis unlike C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp., where the biomass’ affinity towards the cations as indicated by the KF parameter was in the order Cu > Co > Cd; moreover, it was observed that S. platensis’s sorption affinity for the cations under acidic conditions was in the order of Co > Cu > Cd.

3.4. Comparison of the Maximum Adsorption Capacities of the Cations onto Biomass under Acidic Condition

Figure 7 shows a comparison of the maximum adsorption capacities of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis in acidic settings. Here, only the qmax values associated with the isotherm model with a higher determination coefficient between the Langmuir and D-R models are displayed. It was observed that the sorption of the heavy metal ions onto biomass (mmol/kg) was in the order of Cu > Co > Cd. It is assumed that the similarity in the sorption pattern results from shared characteristics of microalgae, such as functional groups on the cell surfaces, physical characteristics, and cell composition [45].

3.5. Biosorption under Neutral Conditions

The adsorption of Cd, Co, and Cu fitted well (0.81 < R2 ≤ 0.99) to all the isotherm models with C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis under neutral conditions.
Figure 8 and Table 4 show the biosorption isotherms and sorption parameters of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris under neutral conditions, respectively. The qmax values as computed using the Langmuir model were 1012 mmol/kg for Cd, 2007 mmol/kg for Co, and 2318 mmol/kg for Cu. The D-R model, on the other hand, estimated qmax values of 643 mmol/kg, 1424 mmol/kg, and 1558 mmol/kg for Cd, Co, and Cu respectively. With the exception of Co cations, the sorption isotherms were observed to have fitted better with the Langmuir model than the D-R model.
For all the cations, the sorption affinity denoted by the Freundlich model parameter KF was higher in the experiments conducted under neutral conditions than in studies conducted under acidic settings. Likewise, as the environment changed from acidic to neutral, the binding capacity denoted by the Langmuir model parameter bL increased. The rise in sorption affinity and binding capacity in neutral settings was attributed to the decrease in H3O+ concentration with an increase in pH. Moreover, in neutral settings, the functional groups on C. vulgaris were deprotonated, thereby, facilitating the binding of the heavy metals onto biomass [43].
Even with the shift from acidic to neutral settings, the energy of sorption denoted by the D-R model parameter E remained below 8 kJ/mol, indicating that the sorption mechanism of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris is largely physical in nature in neutral conditions, just as in acidic conditions.
Figure 9 and Table 5 show the biosorption isotherms and sorption parameters of Cd, Co, and Cu onto Scenedesmus sp. under neutral conditions, respectively. The qmax values as computed using the Langmuir model were 1044 mmol/kg for Cd, 2070 mmol/kg for Co, and 2037 mmol/kg for Cu. The D-R model, on the other hand, estimated qmax values of 606 mmol/kg, 1389 mmol/kg, and 1332 mmol/kg for Cd, Co, and Cu, respectively. With respect to the determination coefficient (R2), the Langmuir model produced a much more accurate estimate of the qmax for Cd and Cu, whereas the D-R model estimated the qmax for Co better.
As with C. vulgaris, similar trends were observed in the sorption mechanism of the cations onto Scenedesmus sp., with a change from acidic to neutral environments. The binding capacity (bL) of the cations increased with a shift in the environment from 0.68 (L/mmol) to 0.81 (L/mmol), 0.29 (L/mmol) to 0.34 (L/mmol), and 0.42 (L/mmol) to 0.59 (L/mmol) for Cd2+, Co2+ and Cu2+, respectively. The sorption affinity (KF) of Scenedesmus sp. also increased with a shift in the environment. Furthermore, as with C. vulgaris, physical sorption remained the primary sorption mechanism of the cations onto Scenedesmus sp. despite switching from acidic to neutral settings.
Figure 10 and Table 6 show the biosorption isotherms and sorption parameters of Cd, Co, and Cu onto S. platensis under neutral conditions, respectively. The Langmuir model computed qmax values of 887 mmol/kg for Cd, 1790 mmol/kg for Co, and 1824 mmol/kg for Cu. The D-R model, in contrast, estimated qmax values of 625 mmol/kg, 1349 mmol/kg, and 1318 mmol/kg for Cd, Co, and Cu, respectively. Compared to the D-R model, the R2 was higher with the Langmuir model for all the cations, implying that the qmax indicated by the Langmuir model was a much more reliable estimate. The Langmuir model appeared to fit the Co and Cu isotherm data better than the Freundlich model, whereas the Cd isotherm data fitted better with the Freundlich model.
Just as with C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp., S. platensis’ sorption affinity (KF) for the cations increased in neutral settings. Additionally, the sorption mechanism remained unaltered as the D-R model generated sorption energy values (E), corresponding to physio-sorption.

3.6. Comparison of the Maximum Adsorption Capacities of the Cations onto Biomass under Neutral Conditions

Figure 11 shows a comparison of the maximum adsorption capacities of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis in neutral settings. Here, only the qmax values associated with the isotherm model with a higher R2 between the Langmuir and D-R are displayed. Similar to the experiments in acidic settings, it was observed that the sorption of the cations onto biomass under neutral conditions was in the order Cu > Co > Cd.

3.7. The Effect of Sorption on the Concentration of Dissolved Carbon

Despite a strain of microalgae having a high maximum adsorption capacity for a particular cation, it is necessary to additionally analyze the bi-products of the biosorption process since they might occasionally be toxic and negate the benefits of adsorption. Sun et al. [22] reported that the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) produced by microalgae during adsorption could further react with chlorine to form haloacetic acids (HAAs) and trihalomethanes (THMs). HAAs and THMs have been associated with a variety of disorders, including cancer and reproductive health issues; they are classified as potential or possible human carcinogens and are thus controlled by several environmental protection agencies across the world [47]. Additionally, high DOC in water can cause aesthetic concerns as well as raising the risk of microbial recurrence in the water supply network [48].
Figure 12 depicts the influence of cation and adsorption time on the amount of DOC generated by C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis in both acidic and neutral environments. The amount of DOC produced by biomass after 24 h of experimentation was in the following order: S. platensis > Scenedesmus sp. > C. vulgaris. When the experiments were performed with S. platensis, it was observed that the solution’s color progressively changed to blueish-purple. This change in color was attributed to the release of the protein phycocyanin, which is believed to have been the source of the high amount of DOC produced by S. platensis.
It was also noted that the experiments under acidic conditions produced more DOC than the experiments under neutral conditions; this might have been due to cell disruption of the biomass at low pH. In both acidic and neutral environments, the biomass seemed to generate the most DOC in the presence of Co2+, followed by Cd2+. However, it was interesting to observe that the presence of Cu2+ suppressed the production of DOC as the control experiments produced more DOC than the biomass spiked with Cu2+.

4. Conclusions

The biosorption of Cd, Co, and Cu onto C. vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and S. platensis in acidic and neutral environments was studied using the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm models. For all the investigated strains of microalgae, it was found that the sorption affinity of the biomass for the metal ions was higher in neutral than in acidic environments. In both acidic and neutral settings, the sorption affinity for Cd and Co onto biomass was in the order of S. platensis > C. vulgaris > Scenedesmus sp., while, for Cu, the order was C. vulgaris > Scenedesmus sp. > S. platensis. The heavy metals Co and Cd were largely present as cations in the solution in both acidic and neutral settings, whereas Cu primarily occurred as a cation in acidic environments and as both a cation and metal precipitate in neutral settings. The maximum adsorption capacity of the heavy metals onto biomass was in the order of Cu > Co > Cd. The Dubinin-Radushkevich model described the sorption mechanism of all the metals onto biomass to be physical in nature. DOC was generated as a byproduct of the sorption of heavy metals. Generally, the amount of DOC generated under acidic conditions was higher than under neutral conditions. S. platensis generated the most DOC, followed by Scenedesmus sp., while C. vulgaris produced the least amount of DOC. In comparison to the control experimental settings, both Cd and Cu sorption appeared to enhance the quantity of DOC generated by biomass, whereas Cu sorption suppressed the production of DOC by biomass.
These findings are significant as they highlight the potential of using microalgae as low-cost and efficient biosorbents for heavy metal removal in varying environmental conditions. The generation of DOC as a byproduct is particularly noteworthy, as it can influence the overall effectiveness and environmental impact of the biosorption process. Understanding the behavior of DOC under different conditions can help in optimizing biosorption processes for industrial applications. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate microalgae strains and environmental settings to maximize heavy metal removal and manage byproduct formation, thereby contributing valuable insights into sustainable wastewater treatment practices.

Author Contributions

J.T.P. and S.O.; methodology, J.T.P.; formal analysis, J.T.P.; investigation, J.T.P.; resources, J.T.P.; data curation, J.T.P.; writing—original draft preparation, J.T.P.; writing—review and editing, S.O.; supervision, S.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Korea Research Foundation, grant number NRF-2018R1D1A1B07049783.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of Jesse T. Phiri’s master’s dissertation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tchounwou, P.B.; Yedjou, C.G.; Patlolla, A.K.; Sutton, D.J. Heavy Metal Toxicity and the Environment. In Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology; Experientia Supplementum; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; Volume 101, pp. 133–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deng, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhuo, R. Recent Advances in Phyto-Combined Remediation of Heavy Metal Pollution in Soil. Biotechnol. Adv. 2024, 72, 108337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sharpe, S.; Lenton, T.M. Are We on the Brink of an Electric Vehicle Boom? Only with More Action. Clim. Policy 2021, 21, 421–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mohtasham, J. Review Article—Renewable Energies. Energy Procedia 2015, 74, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Solangi, K.H.; Islam, M.R.; Saidur, R.; Rahim, N.A.; Fayaz, H. A Review on Global Solar Energy Policy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 2149–2163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jeyaseelan, C.; Jain, A.; Khurana, P.; Kumar, D.; Thatai, S. Ni-Cd Batteries. In Rechargeable Batteries: History, Progress, and Applications; Scrivener Publishing LLC: Austin, TX, USA, 2020; pp. 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stanley, A.G. Cadmium Sulfide Solar Cells. Appl. Solid State Sci. 1975, 5, 251–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. DeCarlo, S.; Matthews, D. More than a Pretty Color: The Renaissance of the Cobalt Industry. J. Int. Commer. Econ. 2019, 2019, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  9. Iglesias-Émbil, M.; Valero, A.; Ortego, A.; Villacampa, M.; Vilaró, J.; Villalba, G. Raw Material Use in a Battery Electric Car—A Thermodynamic Rarity Assessment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 158, 104820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Machura, P.; Li, Q. A Critical Review on Wireless Charging for Electric Vehicles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 104, 209–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Zhuo, R. Removal of Heavy-Metal Pollutants by White Rot Fungi: Mechanisms, Achievements, and Perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 354, 131681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kogel, J.E. Sustainable Development and the Minerals Industry. In Engineering Solutions for Sustainability: Materials and Resources II; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Custodio, M.; Cuadrado, W.; Peñaloza, R.; Montalvo, R.; Ochoa, S.; Quispe, J. Human Risk from Exposure to Heavy Metals and Arsenic in Water from Rivers with Mining Influence in the Central Andes of Peru. Water 2020, 12, 1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Delgado, A.; Fernandez, A.; Chirinos, B.; Barboza, G.; Huamaní, E.L. Impact of the Mining Activity on the Water Quality in Peru Applying the Fuzzy Logic with the Grey Clustering Method. IJACSA Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2021, 12, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Muma, D.; Besa, B.; Manchisi, J.; Banda, W. Effects of Mining Operations on Air and Water Quality in Mufulira District of Zambia: A Case Study of Kankoyo Township. J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 2020, 120, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Atibu, E.K.; Devarajan, N.; Laffite, A.; Giuliani, G.; Salumu, J.A.; Muteb, R.C.; Mulaji, C.K.; Otamonga, J.P.; Elongo, V.; Mpiana, P.T.; et al. Assessment of Trace Metal and Rare Earth Elements Contamination in Rivers around Abandoned and Active Mine Areas. The Case of Lubumbashi River and Tshamilemba Canal, Katanga, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Geochemistry 2016, 76, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Atibu, E.K.; Lacroix, P.; Sivalingam, P.; Ray, N.; Giuliani, G.; Mulaji, C.K.; Otamonga, J.P.; Mpiana, P.T.; Slaveykova, V.I.; Poté, J. High Contamination in the Areas Surrounding Abandoned Mines and Mining Activities: An Impact Assessment of the Dilala, Luilu and Mpingiri Rivers, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Chemosphere 2018, 191, 1008–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Järup, L. Hazards of Heavy Metal Contamination. Br. Med. Bull. 2003, 68, 167–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boonamnuayvitaya, V.; Chaiya, C.; Tanthapanichakoon, W.; Jarudilokkul, S. Removal of Heavy Metals by Adsorbent Prepared from Pyrolyzed Coffee Residues and Clay. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2004, 35, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shamsollahi, Z.; Partovinia, A. Recent Advances on Pollutants Removal by Rice Husk as a Bio-Based Adsorbent: A Critical Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 246, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pak, H.; Phiri, J.; We, J.; Jung, K.; Oh, S. Adsorptive Removal of Arsenic and Lead by Stone Powder/Chitosan/Maghemite Composite Beads. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sun, X.; Huang, H.; Zhao, D.; Lin, J.; Gao, P.; Yao, L. Adsorption of Pb2+ onto Freeze-Dried Microalgae and Environmental Risk Assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 265, 110472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, S.; Zhu, M.; Guo, X.; Yang, B.; Zhuo, R. Coupling of Fenton Reaction and White Rot Fungi for the Degradation of Organic Pollutants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 254, 114697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gao, X.; Wei, M.; Zhang, X.; Xun, Y.; Duan, M.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, M.; Zhu, Y.; Zhuo, R. Copper Removal from Aqueous Solutions by White Rot Fungus Pleurotus Ostreatus GEMB-PO1 and Its Potential in Co-Remediation of Copper and Organic Pollutants. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 395, 130337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vale, M.A.; Ferreira, A.; Pires, J.C.M.; Gonçalves, G.A.L. CO2 Capture Using Microalgae. In Advances in Carbon Capture: Methods, Technologies and Applications; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2020; pp. 381–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Abdel-Raouf, N.; Al-Homaidan, A.A.; Ibraheem, I.B.M. Microalgae and Wastewater Treatment. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2012, 19, 257–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Çelekli, A.; Bozkurt, H. Bio-Sorption of Cadmium and Nickel Ions Using Spirulina Platensis: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Desalination 2011, 275, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aksu, Z.; Dönmez, G. Binary Biosorption of Cadmium(II) and Nickel(II) onto Dried Chlorella Vulgaris: Co-Ion Effect on Mono-Component Isotherm Parameters. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 860–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tien, C.J. Biosorption of Metal Ions by Freshwater Algae with Different Surface Characteristics. Process Biochem. 2002, 38, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tüzün, I.; Bayramoǧlu, G.; Yalçin, E.; Başaran, G.; Çelik, G.; Arica, M.Y. Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies on Biosorption of Hg(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) Ions onto Microalgae Chlamydomonas Reinhardtii. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 77, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fraile, A.; Penche, S.; González, F.; Blázquez, M.L.; Muñoz, J.A.; Ballester, A. Biosorption of Copper, Zinc, Cadmium and Nickel by Chlorella Vulgaris. Chem. Ecol. 2005, 21, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mehta, S.K.; Gaur, J.P. Removal of Ni and Cu from Single and Binary Metal Solutions by Free and Immobilized Chlorella Vulgaris. Eur. J. Protistol. 2001, 37, 261–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Plöhn, M.; Escudero-Oñate, C.; Funk, C. Biosorption of Cd(II) by Nordic Microalgae: Tolerance, Kinetics and Equilibrium Studies. Algal Res. 2021, 59, 102471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hockaday, J.; Harvey, A.; Velasquez-Orta, S. A Comparative Analysis of the Adsorption Kinetics of Cu2+ and Cd2+ by the Microalgae Chlorella Vulgaris and Scenedesmus Obliquus. Algal Res. 2022, 64, 102710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bordoloi, N.; Goswami, R.; Kumar, M.; Kataki, R. Biosorption of Co (II) from Aqueous Solution Using Algal Biochar: Kinetics and Isotherm Studies. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1465–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Skousen, J.G.; Sexstone, A.; Ziemkiewicz, P.F. Acid Mine Drainage Control and Treatment. In Reclamation of Drastically Disturbed Lands; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 2015; pp. 131–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Phiri, J.T. Biosorption of Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ onto Chlorella Vulgaris, Scenedesmus sp., and Spirulina Platensis under Acidic and Neutral Conditions. Master’s Thesis, School of Architectural, Civil, Environmental and Energy Engineering, Major in Civil Engineering The Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  38. Oh, S.; Kwak, M.Y.; Shin, W.S. Competitive Sorption of Lead and Cadmium onto Sediments. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 152, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dubinin, M.M. The Potential Theory of Adsorption of Gases and Vapors for Adsorbents with Energetically Nonuniform Surfaces. Chem. Rev. 1960, 60, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gupta, V.K.; Rastogi, A. Equilibrium and Kinetic Modelling of Cadmium(II) Biosorption by Nonliving Algal Biomass Oedogonium Sp. from Aqueous Phase. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 153, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, M.; Singh, A.K.; Sikandar, M. Study of Sorption and Desorption of Cd (II) from Aqueous Solution Using Isolated Green Algae Chlorella Vulgaris. Appl. Water Sci. 2018, 8, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gu, S.; Lan, C.Q. Biosorption of Heavy Metal Ions by Green Alga Neochloris oleoabundans: Effects of Metal Ion Properties and Cell Wall Structure. J. Hazard Mater. 2021, 418, 126336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cruz-Lopes, L.P.; Macena, M.; Esteves, B.; Guiné, R.P.F. Ideal PH for the Adsorption of Metal Ions Cr6+, Ni2+, Pb2+ in Aqueous Solution with Different Adsorbent Materials. Open Agric. 2021, 6, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Driver, T.; Bajhaiya, A.K.; Allwood, J.W.; Goodacre, R.; Pittman, J.K.; Dean, A.P. Metabolic Responses of Eukaryotic Microalgae to Environmental Stress Limit the Ability of FT-IR Spectroscopy for Species Identification. Algal Res. 2015, 11, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mecozzi, M.; Pietroletti, M.; Tornambé, A. Molecular and Structural Characteristics in Toxic Algae Cultures of Ostreopsis ovata and Ostreopsis spp. Evidenced by FTIR and FTNIR Spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2011, 78, 1572–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Eren, E.; Afsin, B.; Onal, Y. Removal of Lead Ions by Acid Activated and Manganese Oxide-Coated Bentonite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chang, H.H.; Tung, H.H.; Chao, C.C.; Wang, G.S. Occurrence of Haloacetic Acids (HAAs) and Trihalomethanes (THMs) in Drinking Water of Taiwan. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 162, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dissolved Organic Carbon I DOC Analyzers & Sensors I Real Tech Water. Available online: https://realtechwater.com/parameters/dissolved-organic-carbon/ (accessed on 29 January 2023).
Figure 1. Results of the pHpzc of (A) C. vulgaris, (B) Scenedesmus sp., and (C) S. platensis.
Figure 1. Results of the pHpzc of (A) C. vulgaris, (B) Scenedesmus sp., and (C) S. platensis.
Sustainability 16 06342 g001
Figure 2. Influence of pH on the biosorption of (A) Cadmium, (B) Cobalt, and (C) Copper onto the biomass.
Figure 2. Influence of pH on the biosorption of (A) Cadmium, (B) Cobalt, and (C) Copper onto the biomass.
Sustainability 16 06342 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of (A) C. vulgaris, (B) Scenedesmus sp., and (C) S. platensis before and after biosorption of Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+.
Figure 3. FT-IR spectra of (A) C. vulgaris, (B) Scenedesmus sp., and (C) S. platensis before and after biosorption of Cd2+, Co2+, and Cu2+.
Sustainability 16 06342 g003
Figure 4. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto C. vulgaris under acidic conditions.
Figure 4. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto C. vulgaris under acidic conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g004
Figure 5. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto Scenedesmus sp. Under acidic conditions.
Figure 5. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto Scenedesmus sp. Under acidic conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g005
Figure 6. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto S. platensis under acidic conditions.
Figure 6. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto S. platensis under acidic conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of qmax values for cation sorption onto biomass under acidic conditions.
Figure 7. Comparison of qmax values for cation sorption onto biomass under acidic conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g007
Figure 8. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto C. vulgaris under neutral conditions.
Figure 8. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto C. vulgaris under neutral conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g008
Figure 9. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto Scenedesmus sp. under neutral conditions.
Figure 9. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto Scenedesmus sp. under neutral conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g009
Figure 10. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto S. platensis under neutral conditions.
Figure 10. Isotherm results of the adsorption of (A) Cd2+, (B) Co2+, and (C) Cu2+ onto S. platensis under neutral conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g010
Figure 11. Comparison of qmax values for cation sorption onto biomass under neutral conditions.
Figure 11. Comparison of qmax values for cation sorption onto biomass under neutral conditions.
Sustainability 16 06342 g011
Figure 12. Influence of cation and adsorption time on the amount of DOC generated by C. vulgaris (A,D), Scenedesmus sp. (B,E), and S. platensis (C,F) at pH 4 and 7, respectively.
Figure 12. Influence of cation and adsorption time on the amount of DOC generated by C. vulgaris (A,D), Scenedesmus sp. (B,E), and S. platensis (C,F) at pH 4 and 7, respectively.
Sustainability 16 06342 g012
Table 1. Comparison of the isotherm parameters for C. vulgaris under acidic conditions.
Table 1. Comparison of the isotherm parameters for C. vulgaris under acidic conditions.
ModelParameterCdCoCu
LangmuirqmL (mmol/kg)117521721917
bL (L/mmol)0.6170.3060.507
R20.9470.950.97
SSE243414,4305475
RL0.4740.4870.377
FreundlichKF (mmol1-NLN/kg)439.7483.7609.8
N(-)1.3631.3381.51
R20.9230.9250.944
SSE137573224111
D-RqmD (mmol/kg)647.713831347
Kdr (mol2/J2)1.380 × 10−83.669 × 10−82.584 × 10−8
R20.9450.9780.953
SSE18,70016,27462,132
E (kJ/mol)6.0193.6914.4
Table 2. Comparison of the isotherm parameters for Scenedesmus sp. Under acidic conditions.
Table 2. Comparison of the isotherm parameters for Scenedesmus sp. Under acidic conditions.
ModelParameterCdCoCu
LangmuirqmL (mmol/kg)102721822070
bL (L/mmol)0.6820.2920.415
R20.9460.8990.92
SSE177325,00813,751
RL0.4490.4980.426
FreundlichKF (mmol1-NLN/kg)407.7466.4575.3
N(-)1.4071.311.421
R20.9230.8730.889
SSE102611117448
D-RqmD (mmol/kg)592.813981474
Kdr (mol2/J2)1.310 × 10−83.839 × 10−83.290 × 10−8
R20.9450.970.948
SSE14,720192046,868
E (kJ/mol)6.1783.6093.894
Table 3. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for S. platensis under acidic conditions.
Table 3. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for S. platensis under acidic conditions.
ModelParameterCdCoCu
LangmuirqmL (mmol/kg)103417683503
bL (L/mmol)0.9130.5310.177
R20.9690.9260.895
SSE291.13,44922,557
RL0.3780.3510.635
FreundlichKF (mmol1-NLN/kg)485.3579.6503.7
N(-)1.5321.5761.163
R20.950.90.882
SSE537.730281001
D-RqmD (mmol/kg)638.613591754
Kdr (mol2/J2)1.033 × 10−82.923 × 10−84.662 × 10−8
R20.9010.9050.943
SSE39,38580,09721,410
E (kJ/mol)6.9574.1363.275
Table 4. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for C. vulgaris under neutral conditions.
Table 4. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for C. vulgaris under neutral conditions.
ModelParameterCdCoCu
LangmuirqmL (mmol/kg)101220072318
bL (L/mmol)0.9410.4020.522
R20.9510.9210.99
SSE186711,272526.1
RL0.3710.4190.371
FreundlichKF (mmol1-NLN/kg)481.5544.6755.7
N(-)1.5311.4381.501
R20.920.8930.977
SSE125961592057
D-RqmD (mmol/kg)642.614241558
Kdr (mol2/J2)1.041 × 10−83.334 × 10−82.359 × 10−8
R20.9390.9420.926
SSE22,38234,713168,086
E (kJ/mol)6.933.8734.604
Table 5. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for Scenedesmus sp. under neutral conditions.
Table 5. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for Scenedesmus sp. under neutral conditions.
ModelParameterCdCoCu
LangmuirqmL (mmol/kg)104420702037
bL (L/mmol)0.8080.3420.591
R20.9750.8940.986
SSE72412,6381486
RL0.4080.4590.343
FreundlichKF (mmol1-NLN/kg)457.7500.1713.868
N(-)1.4711.3741.556
R20.9580.8720.972
SSE637.962802376.231
D-RqmD (mmol/kg)605.813891332
Kdr (mol2/J2)1.021 × 10−83.550 × 10−81.819 × 10−8
R20.9340.9270.929
SSE18,82217,85162,185
E (kJ/mol)6.9983.7535.243
Table 6. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for S. platensis under neutral conditions.
Table 6. Comparison of the adsorption isotherm parameters for S. platensis under neutral conditions.
ModelParameterCdCoCu
LangmuirqmL (mmol/kg)886.717901824
bL (L/mmol)1.2670.6210.646
R20.9420.9250.969
SSE677.55081357.2
RL0.3050.3190.323
FreundlichKF (mmol1-NLN/kg)488.6643.8675.4
N(-)1.7181.6361.616
R20.9430.8970.956
SSE12.8237821405
D-RqmD (mmol/kg)624.613491318
Kdr (mol2/J2)9.397 × 10−92.344 × 10−82.104 × 10−8
R20.8120.9110.902
SSE76,51158,372117,988
E (kJ/mol)7.2944.6194.875
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Phiri, J.T.; Oh, S. Biosorption of Cd(II), Co(II), and Cu(II) onto Microalgae under Acidic and Neutral Conditions. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156342

AMA Style

Phiri JT, Oh S. Biosorption of Cd(II), Co(II), and Cu(II) onto Microalgae under Acidic and Neutral Conditions. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Phiri, Jesse T., and Sanghwa Oh. 2024. "Biosorption of Cd(II), Co(II), and Cu(II) onto Microalgae under Acidic and Neutral Conditions" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6342. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop