Next Article in Journal
Geological Study Based on Multispectral and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing: A Case Study of the Mahuaping Beryllium–Tungsten Deposit Area in Shangri-La
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Sustainability Attributes in New Product Design Insights from Automotive Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Climate Change on Inflation in 26 Selected Countries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Influence Mechanism of Bidirectional Foreign Direct Investment on Green Total Factor Productivity in China’s Manufacturing Industry

1
School of Economics and Finance, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
School of Marxism, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6386; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156386
Submission received: 31 May 2024 / Revised: 14 July 2024 / Accepted: 23 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resource Price Fluctuations and Sustainable Growth)

Abstract

Recently, China has actively advocated green transformation in manufacturing. This paper applies the Malmquist–Luenberger (ML) index method to measure the green total factor productivity (GTFP) and its decomposition of 28 segments of China’s manufacturing industry from 2004 to 2020; then, it empirically investigates their causal relationship and impact mechanism on bidirectional foreign direct investment (FDI). The results show that inward foreign direct investment (IFDI) and outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) significantly inhibit GTFP, whereas the interactive development level between the two (DFDI) significantly promotes GTFP during the sample period. After decomposing GTFP, it is found that IFDI or OFDI has a significant promotional effect on green technical change (GTC) but an inhibitory effect on green technical efficiency change (GEC), while DFDI has a promotional effect on GTC or GEC. Further research also finds that OFDI can effectively weaken the inhibitory effects in the long run; IFDI, OFDI, and DFDI have the same direction of impact on GTFP or GEC, only showing heterogeneity at the significant level, while their impact on GTC has uncertainty in different types of manufacturing industries. The more rational the manufacturing industry structure, the more significant the promotional effect of IFDI, OFDI, and DFDI on GTFP.
Keywords: inward foreign direct investment (IFDI); outward foreign direct investment (OFDI); green total factor productivity (GTFP); Malmquist–Luenberger (ML) index inward foreign direct investment (IFDI); outward foreign direct investment (OFDI); green total factor productivity (GTFP); Malmquist–Luenberger (ML) index

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feng, Z.; Hua, H.; Wang, L. The Influence Mechanism of Bidirectional Foreign Direct Investment on Green Total Factor Productivity in China’s Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156386

AMA Style

Feng Z, Hua H, Wang L. The Influence Mechanism of Bidirectional Foreign Direct Investment on Green Total Factor Productivity in China’s Manufacturing Industry. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feng, Zongxian, Huiting Hua, and Lingle Wang. 2024. "The Influence Mechanism of Bidirectional Foreign Direct Investment on Green Total Factor Productivity in China’s Manufacturing Industry" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop