Next Article in Journal
The Social Sustainability of the Use of Information and Communication Technologies by Frail Older People Ageing in Place Alone in Italy: Barriers and Impact on Loneliness and Social Isolation
Previous Article in Journal
Inaccuracies and Uncertainties for Harmonic Estimation in Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Employee Readiness for GHRM and Its Individual Antecedents: Instrumental and Change-Based Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Brand Citizenship Behavior and Employee Turnover Intention: A Mixed Methods Approach

by
Safaa Hajj Hussein
and
Najib Bou Zakhem
*
School of Business, Lebanese International University, Rayak P.O. Box 146404, Lebanon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(15), 6528; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156528
Submission received: 15 June 2024 / Revised: 11 July 2024 / Accepted: 15 July 2024 / Published: 30 July 2024

Abstract

:
In light of the escalating necessity for sustainability within Lebanese small to medium-sized enterprises, these organizations are considered contributors to ecological damage. As a consequence, many of these enterprises adopted green human resource management practices encouraging employees toward sustainable behaviors. This is in conformity with the principles of the circular economy that aim to shun resource depletion and resonate with the country’s currency devaluation, political instability, and lack of access to resources. Given this background, this study aims to examine the influence of green human resource management practices on organizational pride, brand citizenship behavior, and turnover intention, moderated by individual green values. This study adopted a mixed-methods approach, collecting quantitative data from 202 employees working for small to medium-sized enterprises through a questionnaire, and qualitative insights through semi-structured interviews from eight managers; these were then analyzed using PLS-SEM and thematic analysis. The results showed that green human resource management practices lead to an increase in organizational pride, which positively influences brand citizenship behavior and negatively affects turnover intention. Individual green values positively moderate the aforementioned relationships. Understanding such detailed interrelationships adds insights into the literature of green practices. Moreover, this is the initial empirical investigation that integrates these concepts within the small to medium-sized enterprise context and provides comprehensive insights to stakeholders to enhance sustainability through appropriate human resource management strategies.

1. Introduction

The building of a strong brand in the highly competitive context of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is considered one of the most crucial points in today’s fast-paced world [1]. Moreover, there is the undeniable need to curb turnover intentions among skilled employees [2,3]. Lebanese SMEs, operating with limited resources and trying to fit in with a constantly changing market, are in a predicament while creating and maintaining their identities [4]. These businesses heavily rely on their brand reputation to win over the market and build consumer trust [5,6], which is closely tied to the retention of reliable and compatible employees on board [7] for the organization’s core values and its success.
Economic instability, reduced resources, and changing consumer preferences are just a few of the challenges that Lebanese SMEs face in their pursuit towards their brand success [8]. Moreover, SMEs are considered to play a critical role for the Lebanese economy in terms of providing economic growth and sustainable development [9]. With this in mind, for SMEs, incorporating environmentally friendly practices into human resources in this modern era is a must that will aid in improving their brand image with regard to sustainability efforts [10].
Many Lebanese firms have followed the global trend of embracing and implementing such green human resource management (GHRM) practices due to its undeniable potential advantages [11]. However, integrating GHRM policies is not an easy demand for such enterprises taking into account that implementing such practices demand many resources and cultural adjustments. Despite these challenges, the adoption of such practices would help provide a promising route for Lebanese SMEs by means of brand reputation and being in line with global sustainability trends.
From a practical perspective, Lebanese SMEs confront fierce competition and operational challenges in building strong brands and retaining skilled employees amidst economic volatility and evolving consumer preferences. Embracing GHRM practices becomes paramount for these enterprises to bolster brand reputation, align with global sustainability norms, and cultivate employee dedication. Understanding these interrelations equips Lebanese SMEs with actionable tips to manage market complexities while advancing environmental sustainability and sustainable development goals. Additionally, implementing GHRM practices can motivate employees by promoting a deeper connection to the company’s values, enhancing their sense of purpose, and increasing overall job satisfaction. This alignment between personal and organizational values can lead to higher levels of motivation and engagement among employees toward environmental values.
The organizations are influenced a lot by the implementation of eco-friendly HR practices, which in turn could influence the attitudes and behaviors of employees. Therefore, eco-conscious HRM procedures can act as a buffer to drive employees toward brand loyalty by instilling a feeling of organizational pride in them [12]. Adding layers to the discourse, establishing a resonance of the values of the employees with green HR practices accentuates employee engagement and commitment toward sustainability initiatives [13]. Furthermore, social identity theory (SIT) throws light on this process with regard to the significance of belonging to a group. If individuals begin to identify themselves by belonging to a group, then the positive aspects of GHRM practices will boost the confidence and self-esteem of the employees, leading them to feel much prouder of the organization [14].
While many studies have examined the impact of GHRM on employee attitudes and behaviors, e.g., [15,16], Most of the previous studies focused on the direct impact of GHRM on organizational outcomes without considering the underlying psychological mechanisms [17]. Furthermore, research has remained limited to examining the interrelationships among positive emotions, such as pride, and environmentally friendly behavior [18,19]. Consequently, research on mediating factors that provide insights into the pathways through which GHRM works is strongly called for.
Furthermore, the literature primarily based on the West has identified many valuable revelations, but there is a significant gap in studies conducted in developing countries [20], such as Lebanon. Therefore, there is a need to understand the dynamics of eco-friendly HRM practices in these countries because of the unique socioeconomic and distinctive cultural factors. Therefore, the aim of this study is to bridge this gap by examining the connection between eco-friendly human resource management and the change in employee behavior; hence, it is concerned with exploring the mediating role played by organizational pride and the moderating effect of individual green values, especially in Lebanese SMEs. Upon a comprehensive understanding of such dynamics, Lebanese SMEs can astutely cope with the challenges in the market while contributing to environmental sustainability and the promotion of sustainable development.
Consequently, this paper seeks to answer the following questions:
  • What is the impact of green human resource management practices on employee turnover intention and brand citizenship behavior?
  • What is the role of organizational pride in the relationship between green human resource management practices and each of employee turnover intention and brand citizenship behavior?
  • Do individual green values buffer the relationship between green human resource management practices and organizational pride?
  • Do individual green values buffer the relationship between organizational pride and brand citizenship behavior?
This study holds substantial contributions in both academic and practical realms. Academically, it enriches the existing literature by examining an integrative green human resource management model within Lebanese SMEs. By examining the effects of green human resource management practices on organizational pride, employee turnover intention, and brand citizenship behavior, this study contributes nuanced insights into how sustainable HR strategies can influence organizational dynamics in a competitive market era. Moreover, it addresses gaps by understanding the mediating role of organizational pride and the moderating influence of individual green values, shedding light on the psychological mechanisms that underpin the relationships between GHRM practices and employee behaviors. Furthermore, the qualitative insights from interviews with managers enrich the understanding of how these practices are implemented and perceived within SMEs, offering context-specific recommendations for effective implementation and organizational change. Together, these contributions advance both the theoretical understanding and practical applications of GHRM in enhancing organizational resilience and sustainability in Lebanese SMEs.

2. Theoretical Background

2.1. Green Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Pride

Green human resource management (GHRM) integrates HR strategies with environmental considerations and has a significant bearing on the prosperity of the organization, apart from sustainability. GHRM practices relate to eco-conscious recruitment, training, performance appraisal, and rewards, which creates environmental accountability and the realization of sustainable development [21]. GHRM initiatives not only strengthen recruitment efforts but also improve employee satisfaction and performance in very competitive segments [22].
Organizational pride (OP) refers to the positive attitude of employees toward their organization, which is based on external ratings of the group’s prestige and accomplishments [23]. OP is an important antecedent to employee attitude and behavior, enhancing employees’ commitment, job satisfaction, and stress resilience [24,25]. Typically, high OP employees show higher loyalty, more proactive behaviors, and greater intentions to stay with the organization [26,27].
Building from the above, GHRM practices have a deep relationship with OP, since organizations concerned with the environment are mostly seen as attractive to potential employees, and even the current employees have pride and satisfaction working in such a company [28]. Green recognition includes non-cash rewards such as public recognition and paid vacations, which instill pride and encourage action to behave in an environmentally friendly manner [29]. The educational approach in GHRM helps increase the employees’ awareness of the environment and their attachment to sustainability [21].
Corporate social responsibility activities also support OP through the creation of community development and conserving resources [30,31]. Additionally, previous studies revealed that OP is a key component to induce an enthusiastic work environment and social affiliation, which is supported by GHRM practices [25]. Moreover, GHRM policies foster an environmentally friendly culture and strengthen employees’ identification with the organization [31,32].
Furthermore, social identity theory (SIT) posits that individuals derive a significant part of their self-concept from their membership in social groups, which in turn influences their behavior and attitudes [33]. In the context of GHRM, when employees perceive their organization as environmentally responsible, they are likely to develop a stronger identification with the organization. This heightened identification can foster a sense of organizational pride (OP) as employees feel proud to be associated with a company that reflects their values and contributes positively to society. The integration of GHRM practices, such as eco-conscious recruitment and green recognition, reinforces this positive organizational identity, thereby enhancing OP. Consequently, employees who identify strongly with their organization are more likely to exhibit increased commitment, job satisfaction, and pro-environmental behaviors, supporting the hypothesis that GHRM positively influences OP.
Expanding from this argument, studies reveal a positive association between GHRM practices and OP, wherein OP acts as a mediating factor between GHRM and pro-environmental behaviors [18,34]. However, further research is required in this domain [35,36]. Hence, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H1. 
There is a positive relationship between GHRM and OP.

2.2. Organizational Pride and Brand Citizenship Behavior

OP is a significant motivator of employee behavior, with implications for the brand citizenship behaviors (BCBs) of employees in an organization [37,38]. As opposed to identity, which is considered mostly cognitive, pride is seen as an affective state that influences constructs, such as BCB, by accentuating the differences and exceeding social norms [39,40]. The association of pride with brand identification implies that the personal–organizational associations are social and psychological in nature; therefore, the pride within the organizations has to be developed [41,42].
The relation between mood and acquiring a supportive behavior from prior studies indicates that pride at work results in a willingness to contribute fully to organizational goals, which is in accordance with the principles of organizational citizenship behavior [43]. Even though OP has received little attention in the literature on internal branding, it is considered critical to the development of the organization’s culture and creating deep employee belongingness, which, in turn, affects work outcomes and brand-related behaviors [44,45].
Moreover, OP serves as both an emotion and a predictor of behaviors. This comes in resonance with the organization’s brand, contributing to perceiving it as a significant influencer of BCB [46]. This motivational catalyst propels employees to exceed conventional expectations, fostering brand advocacy and encouraging employees to exhibit BCB [24,47]. Previous studies by Youn and Kim [48] and Katzenbach [38] further support this notion, indicating that possess the sense of pride in their organization demonstrate higher levels of task performance, job satisfaction, productivity, creativity, and innovation.
In addition, by projecting the SIT theory to these concepts, we can say that when employees experience organizational pride (OP), their identification with the organization strengthens. This strong identification motivates them to engage in brand citizenship behaviors (BCBs), as they align their actions with the organization’s values. By fostering a positive organizational identity through practices that enhance OP, employees are more likely to exhibit BCB, supporting and promoting the brand. Thus, OP significantly motivates BCB, as employees who identify with their organization demonstrate greater loyalty, advocacy, and commitment to the brand’s success.
Acknowledging the previous notions, the relationship between OP and employee behavior has been well recognized but needs more systematic analysis and extensive investigation to contextualize its implications to organizational success [23]. The need for further research to enhance our understanding of the role of OP in driving employees’ behaviors and its implication for business outcomes has been felt over time. In light of the insights drawn above, the following hypothesis is framed:
H2. 
There is a positive relationship between OP and BCB.

2.3. Organizational Pride and Turnover Intention

Experiencing a sense of OP greatly influences an employee’s perception about the organization and the intent to leave [49]. Research by Gouthier and Rhein [23] suggests that there is a solid link between OP and job satisfaction, such that employees who experience the sense of pride in their organization show satisfaction with their jobs. These pride sentiments not only act as a motivator to improve performance but also create more enthusiasm and dedication among employees.
Moreover, Durrah, Chaudhary, and Gharib [50] underline the major contribution of OP in decreasing turnover intention and enhancing employee retention. To deal with the main contributors of OP, such as creating a positive organizational culture and development opportunities, an organization can set up an environment that encourages pride and commitment among employees.
In the same vein, Fiernaningsih et al. [51] suggest that being content with a job is positively influenced by OP, therefore suggesting that cultivating prideful sentiments toward the organization can help solidify workers’ bond as well as induce allegiance with their work. This leads to an increase in job satisfaction, which translates into elevated satisfaction, increased involvement, and lowered intent to leave.
Furthermore, considering recent studies, Chan and Mak [52] and Wang et al. [53] emphasize the role of job satisfaction in enhancing an employee’s commitment to the organization. They also point out that satisfied employees do not quit their job, thus implying an indispensable role of OP in minimizing turnover intention. From that, OP is viewed as one of the key determinants affecting turnover intention. Recent research, however, indicates that emotional exhaustion also plays a crucial role in affecting the intention to leave [54]. Therefore, when trying to study the relationship between OP and turnover intention, a holistic approach taking into account various factors, including OP and emotional exhaustion, cannot be ruled out.
Alongside, according to SIT, when employees experience organizational pride (OP), their identification with the organization strengthens. This strong identification reduces turnover intention, as employees with high OP are less likely to leave. By fostering a positive organizational culture and providing development opportunities, organizations can enhance OP and, consequently, reduce turnover intention. Thus, OP is negatively related to turnover intention, as employees who identify strongly with their organization are more likely to remain committed and loyal.
Based on the previous insights, OP is considered a crucial factor in the process of influencing turnover intention, yet it is not the sole determinant. Other factors such as emotional exhaustion also play a significant role in provoking turnover intentions [25,54]. Therefore, it is essential to consider a more holistic approach in the pursuit of examining the innate association that exists between OP and turnover intention. As a consequence, the following hypothesis is formulated:
H3. 
There is a negative relationship between OP and turnover intention.

2.4. Individual Green Values (IGVs) as a Moderator

For any brand to flourish, it is important to develop a workforce that act as ambassadors and represent positive images of the brand to external stakeholders. Employees’ behaviors tied in with a brand’s values will help build a strong brand image [55]. With that being mentioned, employees who embody the values of their brand demonstrate elevated levels of commitment in addition to spontaneity, aiding in contributing to more favorable performance [56]; as such, IGVs are significant contributors in this alignment. According to social identity theory (SIT), a higher level of IGVs in employees resonates with better organizational harmony when green practices are implemented [33]. These values vary among individuals, and this fluctuation affects the individuals’ commitment to sustainable behaviors within the firm [18]. Acting as a mirror image, IGVs reflect employees’ perspectives on environmental consciousness that catalyze their contributions toward green practices [57]. More specifically, SIT posits that individuals derive part of their identity from the groups they belong to, including their workplace. When employees strongly identify with environmental consciousness (reflected in high IGVs), they are more likely to actively participate in and support green initiatives. Employees who see themselves as part of an environmentally conscious organization are more likely to engage in behaviors that align with these values, such as reducing waste, conserving resources, and promoting sustainability both within and outside the workplace. This alignment between personal and organizational identities not only enhances employee engagement but also contributes to the organization’s overall environmental efforts and sustainability goals. Thus, SIT underscores the importance of organizational values in shaping employee behaviors and fostering a sense of collective responsibility towards environmental stewardship.
Expanding on the discussion, previous research also indicates that employees who hold deep eco-conscious values are prone to maintaining organizational pride while engaging in green practices, with IGVs positively moderating the relationship between eco-conscious HRM actions and employees’ behaviors [12,58,59]. Recent studies highlight the paramount contribution of IGVs in the complex interaction between green HRM practices and organizational performance, showcasing the multi-dimensional nature of this relationship [60,61,62,63]. Given these findings, the following two hypotheses are proposed to further explore the impact of IGVs as a moderator.
H4. 
IGVs moderate the relationship between GHRM and OP.
H5. 
IGVs moderate the relationship between OP and BCB.

2.5. Conceptual Framework

The theoretical framework depicted in Figure 1 serves as a conceptual basis and organizational framework for comprehending the connections among variables and concepts examined in this research.

3. Research Design

3.1. Sampling and Data Collection

A triangulation mixed-methods approach is applied in the process of research and gathering of quantitative and qualitative information. Methodological triangulation was employed in this study through the use of both interviews with managers and questionnaires with employees (Appendix A). This approach was implemented to cross-validate findings and to obtain a multifaceted perspective on the topic. By integrating data from multiple sources, the robustness and validity of the research outcomes were enhanced. Convenience sampling is employed for the gathering of quantitative data. Convenience sampling is an approach in non-probability sampling, which is the most prevalent in developmental science, mainly because of the following: cost-effectiveness, time efficiency, and simplicity in execution [64]. According to the Ministry of Economy and Trade in Lebanon, SMEs constitute 70% of the Lebanese workforce. The sample size of the quantitative data was obtained from G*Power, ranging from 131 to 180 participants based on 80% statistical power, f = 0.01 effect size, a criterion R2 of 0.10, and an α level of 0.01, as advised by Faul et al. [65] and Hair et al. [66].This range indicates that any sample size above 180 participants is appropriate to analyze the results and make generalizations. Collection of data took place between January and February 2024. In total, 350 questionnaires were given out; 202 SME employees responded to it, which represents a 57.7% response rate. Data collection for this study included SMEs from diverse sectors such as pharmaceuticals, manufacturing, education, healthcare, and technology. Among the respondents in this survey, females are the majority among the participants at 59.9%, while males make up 40.1%. In terms of age, the 45–54 age group is the highest in the sample at 22.6%. Moreover, holders of bachelor’s degrees are the largest educational group in this study at 42.5%.
Additionally, the qualitative data collection was carried out using the purposive sampling technique. In qualitative research, while not random, purposive sampling maintains rigor by allowing for researchers to sample participants possessing the relevant experiences or characteristics that pertain to the study’s objectives, as emphasized by Smith and Osborn [67]. In the process of collecting the qualitative data, purposive sampling was employed to select participants who met specific criteria that are relevant to the research objectives. Addressing each facet of rigor involves attending to various elements that contribute to the quality and reliability of the research [68]. The sample size in purposive sampling is determined by “data saturation” [69]. Saturation of data was reached after “8 interviews” where no new information or themes emerged from later interviews; hence, the managerial insights on the subject under study were fully covered.
Common method bias was addressed in this study through rigorous methodological approaches. Firstly, anonymity and confidentiality were ensured in the questionnaire to encourage honest responses from participants without fear of repercussions. Secondly, data collection employed a dual-source approach, gathering information both from employees via surveys and from employers through semi-structured interviews. This methodological design aimed to minimize bias by capturing perspectives from multiple sources, thereby enhancing the reliability and validity of the findings.

3.2. Measures

The questionnaire items, relating to all the variables, were taken from the available literature and were used in this research. Meant to be answered by the employees, a five-point Likert scale was used for every variable. GHRM practices had been operationalized using six items. This is as suggested by “Kim et al.” [70]. The variable BCB was gauged using a scale of 7 items as suggested by “Van Nguyen et al.” [71]. Operationalizing OP involved the adoption of four items from “Ng, Yam and Aguinis” [72]. The measurement items for the variable turnover intention were measured using a three-item scale implemented by “Long et al.” [73]. Finally, three items to measure IGVs were drawn from Chou’s research [74]. To enhance clarity and comprehension, the survey questions underwent transcription and editing.
The interview questions were semi-structured and based on the concepts of GHRM practices within the organization by “Pavlova, Salminen, and Mattila” [75]. The questions were oriented to reveal specific green initiatives and activities, assess personal perception toward those initiatives, and explore how the managers support them. Organizational pride-oriented questions were posed based on the pride theory by “Wenström, Uusiautti, and Matta” [76], eliciting what makes managers proud and the question of co-operation with other people and its effect on enthusiasm. Actions related to brand citizenship-oriented questions were adapted from “Arda et al.” [77], and those that sought answers related to employee turnover intention were adapted from “Tan et al.” [78] to explore job satisfaction, challenges, and coping strategies. Finally, questions seeking individual green values were designed based on “Perey’s” [79] narrative interview approach—questions that elicited discussion over the submitted suggestions to environmental sustainability and its effects from a managerial point of view.

4. Data Analysis

In the proposed model of this study, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used. According to Hair et al. [80], PLS is considered appropriate for a more comprehensive range of sample sizes and an advanced model with fewer limitations on the data, besides being an efficient technique. Given the presence of multiple items for each factor presented in this study, PLS-SEM allows for better inclusion of these factors in comparison to other statistical methods. PLS-SEM finds application in conducting moderation analyses with continuous variables.
The Gioia methodology was used in collecting and processing qualitative data because of its increased rigor by using the systematic research approach. According to Gioia, Corley, and Hamilton [81], the process involves three key steps: firstly, generating analytic codes and categories, and organizing these into a structured data format consisting of “1st-order” (informant-centered) codes, “2nd-order” (theory-centered) themes, and “aggregate dimensions”. In this study, a manual process was employed to transcribe and perform thematic analysis, in order to screen the data derived from the eight interviews conducted. Each interview was transcribed by hand, which captured the nuances of language and non-verbal cues necessary to piecing together the participants’ views.

4.1. Results

In the process of investigating the relationship between GHRM practices and their impact on BCB and turnover intention, both questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were undertaken. The research calls upon a triangulation approach in which quantitative analysis is combined with qualitative inquiry; this allows for gaining insights into employee and managerial viewpoints. Such concurrent usage of methods enhances both the robustness and the depth of findings, thereby adding to the validity and reliability of research. Triangulation helps in the process of uncovering the reality inherent in the data, as noted by Denzin [82] and Denzin and Lincoln [83]. Further, through the use of diversified datasets, methodologies, theories, and investigators, triangulation enhances the depth of research and allows for the derivation of deep-seated conclusions, as noted by Ajemba and Chinwe [84].

4.1.1. Quantitative Results

The measurements were checked for both reliability and validity before further analysis. Table 1 shows that the standardized loading exceeds the threshold that is 0.5. In addition to that, Cronbach’s Alpha values and the composite reliability (CR) coefficients surpassed the acceptable thresholds: the Cronbach’s Alpha values were above 0.6, in accordance with Vaske et al. [85], while the CR values were above 0.7, following the suggestions of Hair et al. [66] indicating internal consistency. The average variance extracted (AVE) crossed the threshold of 0.5, this proves that a satisfactory convergent validity exist. The heterotrait/monotrait (HT-MT) ratio was used for discriminant validity, as demonstrated in Table 2, by comparing the correlation between indicators of different constructs to those of the same construct. All HT-MT values fall below 0.85, which is considered satisfactory, according to Hair et al. [66]. This means that the constructs in the model represent distinct concepts, each measuring different underlying concepts. Based on this, as evidenced by the outcomes of Table 1 and Table 2, the measurement model is adequate.
In addition to the fact that the measurement model is valid, the structural model also went through a process of analyzing and verification. Indicators such as the normal fit index (NFI = 0.931) were considered, and the standardized root mean square residual (SRMR = 0.021) was found to be within acceptable thresholds, indicating no multicollinearity issues. Additionally, in behavioral research, achieving an R2 value of 0.20 is considered a notable standard [80]. Likewise, Q2 values exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.0 [86]. Moreover, this study judges the appropriateness of the model by comparing the differences in observed variances and correlations using the “Standardized Root Mean Square Residual”. An SRMR < 0.08 has been considered by Hu and Bentler [87] to indicate an adequate fit. The SRMR value of the proposed model, standing at 0.021, signifies an adequate model fit. These findings, presented in Table 3, confirm a good fit for the statistical model. Moreover, Figure 2 and Figure 3 represent the interaction effect in a plot, where IGVs enhanced the positive linkages between GHRM and OP, and also between OP and BCB, respectively, even on lower levels (i.e., the lower line in each figure is also ascending but with a smaller slope).

4.1.2. Qualitative Results

Through the eight interviews performed with the managers of the SMEs, managerial perspectives are collected on green initiatives to gain deeper insights. The interviews probed into the different aspects of organizational attributes, including the implementation of and importance given to green initiatives, the role of managers, and the implications for the organizational performance. Table 4 summarizes key themes with representative quotes from the interview responses regarding green practices, their importance, and role in advancing these initiatives.
To understand the drivers of organizational pride in Lebanese SMEs, the managers shared their views of the work environment, practices that are positive, and collaboration. Table 5 outlines the key themes and includes selected quotes from their responses.
To comprehend managers’ perception on how they support the brand, managers offered a reflection on their broad experiences and techniques to enhance brand reputation. Table 6 accentuates different themes and prominent responses that these managers have provided.
To get more holistic insights about aspects that impact employees leaving intentions within SMEs in Lebanon, managers explained their miscellaneous strategies in how they address such intentions and how they foster the retention of employees. Table 7 presents key themes and attributes from the managers responses.
Managers perspectives and insights are shared regarding IGVs including different suggestions for sustainability that has been recommended, the nature of such recommendations, in addition to the importance of such prompts within the SMEs. Table 8 presents these characteristics and quotes.

5. Discussion

The first hypothesis, which was related to the impact of the environmentally conscious HRM practices on OP, was supported by the current study and is in line with prior research by Elshaer et al. [18], Jabbour, Santos and Nagano [28], Maior et al. [88], Onwezen et al. [89], and Bissing-Olson et al. [90]. The insights obtained from interviews with managers in the Lebanese SMEs focused mainly on the environment showed an elevated level of pride. According to insights shared by managers, amidst Lebanon’s current economic and political challenges, the government’s neglect of green issues has amplified the importance of environmental initiatives embraced by SMEs. As per their observations, these initiatives are seen not just as obligatory actions but as authentic demonstrations of the company’s concern for the environment and social responsibility toward society. This genuine commitment, as perceived by the managers, fosters a heightened sense of organizational pride among employees.
In a similar vein, this study’s quantitative results showing that there is indeed a positive relationship between OP and brand loyalty behaviors, as theorized in hypothesis 2, confirm the previous theories. The results corroborate those of Tyler and Blader [26], and Elshaer et al. [18]. Based on the qualitative findings, employees’ pride in their companies significantly influences brand loyalty [91]. Ajzen [92] suggests that attitude predicts behavior. From this viewpoint, pride owners will be more loyal to the organization. Key factors contributing to this pride include meaningful job roles, personal attachment to the job, organizational culture, training initiatives, competitive remuneration, and career prospects. Team working was highlighted by managers as important in productivity, but its degree of adoption is variable in organizations. Moreover, there is a clear indication that managers high in organizational pride are strongly committed to protecting the reputation of the brand, consistent with the conclusions of Ilyas et al. [93]. In light of that, it is an important awareness to have in order to support the perception of the brand and encourage employee ambassadors of the brand.
Further, in the quantitative data analysis, it was found that statistical analysis shows an inverse relationship between OP and employee turnover intention. In fact, the findings support hypothesis 3. These findings are consistent with the prior studies conducted by Brown et al. [94], Kraemer and Gouthier [25], and Gouthier and Rhein [23]. While looking at the qualitative data analysis, it is found that OP is significantly influencing the management of turnover intention within the organizations. Based on the insights of interviewed managers, it is shown that those who have higher OP show more proactive approaches toward addressing turnover intention. They have paid more attention to issues such as job satisfaction, well-being of the employees, and employee retention strategies. OP develops a sense of belonging and commitment among the employees, which in turn lessens the desire for a switch to another employment. Additionally, job satisfaction, well-being of employees, fair compensation, and positive organizational cultures are important issues influencing both OP and the rate of employee retention, which is consistent with the revelations of Alam and Asim [95]. The impact of OP on turnover intentions is very important for organizations trying to reduce turnover rates and maintain greater stability in their workforce. The factors, as informed by the managers, include the state of economic conditions, the political environment, career growth opportunities, job satisfaction, and work–life balance.
Additionally, the results from the PLS-SEM analysis supported the moderating effect of IGVs on the relationships between GHRM-OP association, as proposed in hypothesis 4. These findings are in line with previous studies that show when the values of the organization match personal values, there is a significant improvement in employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward their work, e.g., [17,18,62]. In addition, from this study, qualitative insights can be derived that contribute valuable understanding to the subject, enriching our comprehension. Societal priorities are shifting; hence, new times require a second look at the GHRM-OP relationship. The current economic stability and health-related problems may overshadow the engagement in GHRM practices, thereby resulting in a potential mismatch. Understanding how economic and health factors interact with perceptions of OP and GHRM enables an organization to adapt these practices strategically to enhance sustainability. This rich understanding facilitates the effectiveness of the GHRM initiatives, even when challenged by external factors. These results reconcile with previous studies that have shed light on the significant role of green human resource management practices in improving the conditions of developing countries, e.g., [96,97].
Likewise, the results from the quantitative analysis supported the mediating impact of IGVs on the OP-BCB association as hypothesized in hypothesis 5. The results were expected since the previous literature shows that IGVs strengthen the association between GHRM practices and employees’ environmental enthusiasm [12,18] and add to citizenship behavior in general [62]. Qualitatively, managers underlined the necessity of valuing the employees’ green insights and suggestions, indicating that when their voices are being heard and they are trusted by their organization, they will show loyalty and a strong sense of belonging. Questions here come up with regard to the effect of employee involvement and trust on their citizenship behavior.
More specifically, the interviews conducted with managers further justified these ideas. Managers observed that GHRM practices do more than just promote environmental responsibility; they also foster a sense of organizational pride among employees. This pride is crucial as it enhances brand citizenship behavior, where employees actively support and promote the organization’s brand values. Managers noted that employees who feel proud of their organization’s green initiatives are more likely to engage in behaviors that reflect positively on the organization, thereby strengthening its brand image.
Moreover, the managers highlighted that organizational pride reduces turnover intention. Employees who are proud of their organization’s commitment to environmental sustainability are more likely to feel a strong sense of loyalty and are less inclined to seek employment elsewhere. This reduced turnover intention is beneficial for organizational stability and continuity.
Importantly, individual green values (IGVs) were found to amplify these positive outcomes. Managers reported that employees with strong personal environmental values resonate more with the organization’s GHRM practices, leading to a deeper alignment between personal and organizational values. This alignment enhances employees’ commitment and dedication to the organization, driving both enhanced brand citizenship behavior and lower turnover rates.

6. Conclusions

This research investigates the impact of green HRM practices on OP, BCB, and turnover intention as well as the moderating effect of IGVs in Lebanese SMEs, drawing mainly from the insights of SET and SIT. The revealed findings show that GHRM practices indeed are related positively to OP and BCB, while higher OP relates to lower turnover intention. IGVs moderately affect these associations; hence, HRM practices need to match and resonate the values of the employees. The conclusions and implications drawn from the quantitative and qualitative analyses enable one to draw more comprehensive insights toward furthering sustainability and success in Lebanese SMEs through ensuring tailormade HRM practices within the local context. Above all, this research reveals the acute role of GHRM practices in increasing organizational success and offers practical recommendations for managers of SMEs who seek to achieve a better degree of fit between their HRM practices and employee engagement and retention.
The findings can be integrated at many levels, such as practitioners, policymakers, and academicians. First, the managers in SMEs can utilize insights from GHRM practices to further elevate their organizational sustainability efforts. With green HRM, like green training, communication, recruitment, and performance management, managers are able to develop and maintain sustainable behavior of their employees besides improving the general organizational sustainability performance.
Policymakers can benefit from knowing what the regulatory framework and government control do regarding sustainability, particularly in the case of SMEs. The effectiveness of existing policies and identification of regulatory gaps can provide grounds for recommendations to improve regulatory mechanisms in view of sustainable business practices. The understanding will be material to establishing a conducive atmosphere for SMEs to adopt and implement green initiatives effectively.
Combining the theoretical framework with empirical evidence, this study indeed gives a roadmap for SMEs to adopt sustainable HRM strategies. In a practical sense, this study would provide valuable information for SME managers on how to manage initiatives that would create organizational pride and good brand citizenship, hence creating an environment that would best attract and retain human talent. Ultimately, the adoption of strategic HRM approaches, tailored to the needs of Lebanese SMEs, can facilitate flourishing and long-term development.
Based on the above, the research findings highlight significant implications for both managerial practices and academic discourse, particularly in the context of Lebanese SMEs.

6.1. Managerial Implications

Managers in SMEs in Lebanon can gain significant insights from this study to enhance their organizational sustainability efforts. This paper presents novel implications for the strategic implementation of GHRM practices, such as green training, communication, recruitment, and performance management, which collectively foster sustainable behaviors among employees. By aligning HRM strategies with employee values, managers can improve organizational sustainability performance while enhancing employee engagement and retention.
Given Lebanon’s unique environmental challenges, it is imperative for SMEs to adopt eco-conscious practices. The findings underscore the critical role of GHRM in driving organizational success through tailored practices that resonate with employee values. Managers in Lebanese SMEs can leverage these insights to develop and refine HR policies that emphasize sustainability, embedding green values into the organizational culture. This supports environmental goals and builds a positive reputation, attracting talent and strengthening employee and customer loyalty. Moreover, it is crucial for managers to stay informed about and adapt to regulatory initiatives concerning sustainability, especially in Lebanon. Continuously refining and upgrading codes of conduct and regulatory frameworks ensures alignment with legal requirements and industry standards, safeguarding long-term viability.
In Lebanon, where economic and environmental stability are interconnected, establishing a conducive environment for SMEs to implement green HRM initiatives is vital for national sustainable development. This study shows how Lebanese SMEs can contribute to broader sustainability goals by integrating green practices into their HRM strategies. By fostering a green organizational culture, Lebanese SMEs can address environmental issues and enhance their resilience and success in a challenging economic era.

6.2. Academic Implications

Academicians can use the theoretical framework and empirical evidence presented in this study to further academic discourse on sustainable HRM strategies. By combining insights from social exchange theory (SET) and social identity theory (SIT) with empirical findings, this study offers a novel roadmap for SMEs to adopt and implement sustainable HRM practices effectively. This integrated model has not been extensively examined before, especially in the Middle East.
This study fills a critical gap in the existing literature by examining how GHRM practices influence organizational pride (OP), brand citizenship behavior (BCB), and turnover intention in SMEs. It highlights the strategic value of aligning HRM practices with environmental sustainability goals, demonstrating the positive impact on employee engagement and retention.
Empirical evidence from qualitative interviews with managers in Lebanon adds depth to the theoretical insights, revealing real-world applications of GHRM practices in a region where such research is sparse. This validation strengthens the theoretical framework and provides a robust basis for future research.

7. Limitations and Recommendations

Acknowledging the constraints of the study pave the way for future research directions on green HRM practice to overcome such limitations. Although the research offers valuable insights into the determinants affecting the adoption and efficacy of eco-friendly HRM practices, the existence of extension possibilities is undeniable. Future research can extend the given model by considering other variables, such as organizational culture, styles of leadership, trust, and employee perception. Additionally, longitudinal studies would have the advantage of monitoring the longer-term effects of eco-conscious HRM initiatives on green and non-green organizational outcomes as well as employee behaviors. Moreover, further studies can delve into the impact of external factors, such as regulatory frameworks and market dynamics, on the GHRM practices efficacy. In addition to that, different managerial strategies need to be investigated to provide a much broader basis of understanding regarding the implementation of such practices. Moreover, convenience sampling was used to collect questionnaires, introducing potential biases that may affect sample representativeness and the generalizability of findings. Future research could utilize probability sampling methods and conduct normality tests for more robust results. Lastly, comparative studies across diverse industries and geographical regions would enhance the generalizability of findings and the wider debate on sustainable HRM practices.

Author Contributions

Both researchers equally contributed to this research. Conceptualization, N.B.Z.; methodology, S.H.H.; validation, N.B.Z.; formal analysis; S.H.H.; data curation, S.H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.H.H.; writing—review and editing, N.B.Z.; visualization, N.B.Z., supervision, N.B.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study received approval from the IRB of the Lebanese International University and complied with the university’s ethical guidelines.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in this study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available upon request from researchers who make the eligibility criteria. Kindly contact the first author privately through e-mail.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Questionnaire

Statement1
SD
2
D
3
N
4
A
5
SA
Green Human Resource Management Practices
1.My organization encourages employees to provide suggestions on environmental improvement.
2.My organization provides a different training to promote environmental management as a core organizational value.
3.My organization considers how well an employee is doing at being eco-friendly as part of their performance appraisals.
4.The education activities incorporate entrepreneurship matter and allow opportunities for us to begin a business.
5.My organization relates employee’s eco-friendly behavior to rewards and compensation.
6. My organization considers personal identity-environmental management fit in recruitment and selection.
Organizational Pride
7.I feel proud to be a member of this organization.
8.I feel proud to tell others that I work for this organization.
9.I feel proud to identify myself personally with this organization.
10.I’m proud to be a part of this organization.
Brand Citizenship Behavior
11.I take responsibility for tasks outside of my own area, if necessary.
12.I demonstrate behaviors that are consistent with the brand promise of the organization I work for.
13.I consider the impact on my organization’s brand before communicating or taking action in any situation.
14.I regularly recommend the organization’s brand I work for, family and friends. i.e., non-job-related acquaintances.
15.If given the opportunity, I pass on my knowledge about my organization’s brand to new employees.
16. I am always interested to learn about my organization’s brand and what it means for me in my role.
17.I show extra initiative to ensure that my behavior remains consistent with the brand promise of the organization I work.
Individual Green Values
18.I feel a personal obligation to do whatever I can to prevent environmental degradation.
19.The Earth is like a spaceship with limited room and resources.
20.I feel obliged to bear the environment and nature in my mind in my daily behavior.
Turnover Intention
21.I often think about quitting my present job.
22.I will probably look for a new job in the next year.
23.As soon as possible, I will leave the organization.

References

  1. Dumitriu, D.; Militaru, G.; Deselnicu, D.C.; Niculescu, A.; Popescu, M.A.-M. A Perspective over Modern SMEs: Managing Brand Equity, Growth and Sustainability through Digital Marketing Tools and Techniques. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Q.; Wang, C. Reducing turnover intention: Perceived organizational support for frontline employees. Front. Bus. Res. China 2020, 14, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lamane-Harim, J.; Cegarra-Leiva, D.; Sánchez-Vidal, M.E. Work–life balance supportive culture: A way to retain employees in Spanish SMEs. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 34, 2074–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Risdwiyanto, A.; Sulaeman, M.M.; Rachman, A. Sustainable Digital Marketing Strategy for Long-Term Growth of MSMEs. J. Contemp. Adm. Manag. 2023, 1, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elhajjar, S.; Ouaida, F. The importance of brand reputation for Lebanese SMEs. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2020, 27, 383–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Le, T.T. Corporate social responsibility and SMEs’ performance: Mediating role of corporate image, corporate reputation and customer loyalty. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2023, 18, 4565–4590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, V.R.; Selvaraj, M.; Venkateswaran, P.; Sabarirajan, A.; Shatila, K.; Agarwal, V. The impact of training and development programs on employees performance: The case of Lebanese SMEs. Int. J. Intellect. Prop. Manag. 2022, 12, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khabbaz, L.; Kuran, O. Empowering Rural Lebanese Female Entrepreneurs: A Resource-Based Perspective. J. Dev. Entrep. 2024, 29, 2450002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El Nemar, S.; El-Chaarani, H.; Dandachi, I.; Castellano, S. Resource-based view and sustainable advantage: A framework for SMEs. J. Strateg. Mark. 2022, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wen, J.; Hussain, H.; Waheed, J.; Ali, W.; Jamil, I. Pathway toward environmental sustainability: Mediating role of corporate social responsibility in green human resource management practices in small and medium enterprises. Int. J. Manpow. 2022, 43, 701–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chreif, M.; Farmanesh, P. Applying Green Human Resource Practices toward Sustainable Workplace: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, W.G.; McGinley, S.; Choi, H.-M.; Agmapisarn, C. Hotels’ environmental leadership and employees’ organizational citizenship behavior. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 87, 102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Naz, S.; Jamshed, S.; Nisar, Q.A.; Nasir, N. Green HRM, psychological green climate and pro-environmental behaviors: An efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China. Curr. Psychol. 2019, 42, 1346–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hewstone, M.; Rubin, M.; Willis, H. Intergroup Bias. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2002, 53, 575–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chaudhary, R. Green Human Resource Management and Employee Green Behavior: An Empirical Analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 27, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Singh, S.K.; Del Giudice, M.; Chierici, R.; Graziano, D. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 150, 119762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hameed, Z.; Khan, I.U.; Islam, T.; Sheikh, Z.; Khan, S.U. Corporate social responsibility and employee pro-environmental behaviors. South Asian J. Bus. Stud. 2019, 8, 246–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elshaer, I.A.; Azazz, A.M.S.; Kooli, C.; Fayyad, S. Green Human Resource Management and Brand Citizenship Behavior in the Hotel Industry: Mediation of Organizational Pride and Individual Green Values as a Moderator. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Niazi, A.; Qureshi, M.I.; Iftikhar, M.; Obaid, A. The impact of GHRM practices on employee workplace outcomes and organizational pride: A conservation of resource theory perspective. Empl. Relations: Int. J. 2024, 46, 383–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cabral, C.; Jabbour, C.J.C. Understanding the human side of green hospitality management. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 88, 102389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahmad, S. Green Human Resource Management: Policies and practices. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2015, 2, 1030817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ghouri, A.M.; Mani, V.; Khan, M.R.; Khan, N.R.; Srivastava, A.P. Enhancing business performance through green human resource management practices: An empirical evidence from Malaysian manufacturing industry. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2020, 69, 1585–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gouthier, M.H.; Rhein, M. Organizational pride and its positive effects on employee behavior. J. Serv. Manag. 2011, 22, 633–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tracy, J.L.; Robins, R.W. Emerging insights into the nature and function of pride. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 16, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kraemer, T.; Gouthier, M.H. How organizational pride and emotional exhaustion explain turnover intentions in call centers. J. Serv. Manag. 2014, 25, 125–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tyler, T.R.; Blader, S.L. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2003, 7, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Helm, S. A Matter of Reputation and Pride: Associations between Perceived External Reputation, Pride in Membership, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions. Br. J. Manag. 2013, 24, 542–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jabbour, C.J.C.; Santos, F.C.A.; Nagano, M.S. Contributions of HRM throughout the stages of environmental management: Methodological triangulation applied to companies in Brazil. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2010, 21, 1049–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Boezeman, E.J.; Ellemers, N. Volunteer leadership: The role of pride and respect in organizational identification and leadership satisfaction. Leadership 2014, 10, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al Kerdawy, M.M.A. The Role of Corporate Support for Employee Volunteering in Strengthening the Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Egyptian Firms. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2019, 16, 1079–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sarfo, P.A.; Zhang, J.; Nyantakyi, G.; Lassey, F.A.; Bruce, E.; Amankwah, O. Influence of Green Human Resource Management on firm’s environmental performance: Green Employee Empowerment as a mediating factor. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0293957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jia, J.; Liu, H.; Chin, T.; Hu, D. The Continuous Mediating Effects of GHRM on Employees’ Green Passion via Transformational Leadership and Green Creativity. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Cao, Y.; Yan, B.; Teng, Y. Individual green values and their impact on organizational behavior: A SIT perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2023, 174, 345–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zafar, H.; Suseno, Y. Examining the Effects of Green Human Resource Management Practices, Green Psychological Climate, and Organizational Pride on Employees’ Voluntary Pro-Environmental Behavior. Organ. Environ. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Latan, H.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Jabbour, A.B.L.d.S.; Wamba, S.F.; Shahbaz, M. Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 180, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Farooq, M.S.; Salam, M. Nexus between CSR and DSIW: A PLS-SEM Approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 86, 102437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Helm, S.V.; Renk, U.; Mishra, A. Exploring the impact of employees’ self-concept, brand identification and brand pride on brand citizenship behaviors. Eur. J. Mark. 2016, 50, 58–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Katzenbach, J. Pride: A strategic asset. Strateg. Leadersh. 2003, 31, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jung, H. Resting on Your Laurels: The Effects of Pride on Persistence at Creative Tasks, Inaugural Dissertation, UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2013. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2mb7067q (accessed on 2 June 2024).
  40. Lewis, M. Self-Conscious Emotions: Embarrassment, Pride, Shame, and Guilt. In Handbook of Cognition and Emotion; Dalgleish, T., Power, M.J., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 623–636. [Google Scholar]
  41. Saleem, F.Z.; Iglesias, O. Mapping the domain of the fragmented field of internal branding. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2016, 25, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Verbeke, W.; Belschak, F.; Bagozzi, R.P. The Adaptive Consequences of Pride in Personal Selling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32, 386–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. George, J.M.; Brief, A.P. Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work- organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 310–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ramlall, S.J. Enhancing Employee Performance through Positive Organizational Behavior. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 38, 1580–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Luthans, F. The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. 2002, 23, 695–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Helm, S. Employees’ awareness of their impact on corporate reputation. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 64, 657–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chiang, H.-H.; Chang, A.; Han, T.-S.; Mcconville, D. Corporate Branding, Brand Psychological Ownership and Brand Citizenship Behaviour: Multilevel Analysis and Managerial Implications. J. Gen. Manag. 2013, 39, 55–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Youn, H.; Kim, J.-H. Corporate Social Responsibility and Hotel Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of Organizational Pride and Meaningfulness of Work. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mas-Machuca, M.; Berbegal-Mirabent, J.; Alegre, I. Work-life balance and its relationship with organizational pride and job satisfaction. J. Manag. Psychol. 2016, 31, 586–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Durrah, O.; Chaudhary, M.; Gharib, M. Organizational Cynicism and Its Impact on Organizational Pride in Industrial Organizations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Fiernaningsih, N.; Nimran, U.; Raharjo, K.; Arifin, Z. The Role of Work-Life Balance, Organizational Pride, and Job Satisfaction on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Case Study on Hospitality Employees in Indonesia. Russ. J. Ag-Ricultural Socio-Econ. Sci. 2019, 91, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chan, S.C.; Mak, W. Transformational leadership, pride in being a follower of the leader and organizational commitment. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2014, 35, 674–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, C.; Xu, J.; Zhang, T.C.; Li, Q.M. Effects of professional identity on turnover intention in China’s hotel employees: The mediating role of employee engagement and job satisfaction. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kraemer, T.; Gouthier, M.H.J.; Heidenreich, S. Proud to stay or too proud to stay? How pride in personal performance develops and how it affects turnover intentions. J. Serv. Res. 2017, 20, 152–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hurrell, S.A.; Scholarios, D. The People Make the Brand. J. Serv. Res. 2014, 17, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Raza, S.A.; Qazi, W.; Khan, K.A.; Salam, J. Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2021, 59, 183–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Raza, S.A.; Khan, K.A. Impact of green human resource practices on hotel environmental performance: The moderating effect of environmental knowledge and individual green values. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 2154–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Anwar, N.; Mahmood, N.H.N.; Yusliza, M.Y.; Ramayah, T.; Faezah, J.N.; Khalid, W. Green Human Resource Management for organisational citizenship behavior towards the environment and environmental performance on a university campus. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hooi, L.W.; Liu, M.-S.; Lin, J.J. Green human resource management and green organizational citizenship behavior: Do green culture and green values matter? Int. J. Manpow. 2021, 43, 763–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Sun, L. The impact of green HRM practices on employee green behavior: A social identity perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 281, 111908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dumont, J.; Shen, J.; Deng, X. Effects of Green HRM Practices on Employee Green Behavior: The Role of Psychological Green Climate and Employee Green Values. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017, 36, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Islam, A.; Jantan, A.H.; Yusoff, Y.M.; Chong, C.W.; Hossain, S. Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) Practices and Millennial Employees’ Turnover Intentions in Tourism Industry in Malaysia: Moderating Role of Work Environment. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2020, 24, 642–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huo, X.; Azhar, A.; Rehman, N.; Majeed, N. The Role of Green Human Resource Management Practices in Driving Green Performance in the Context of Manufacturing SMEs. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bornstein, M.H.; Jager, J.; Putnick, D.L. Sampling in developmental science: Situations, shortcomings, solutions, and standards. Dev. Rev. 2013, 33, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2018, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Smith, J.A.; Osborn, M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods; Smith, J.A., Ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2008; pp. 53–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Campbell, S.; Greenwood, M.; Prior, S.; Shearer, T.; Walkem, K.; Young, S.; Bywaters, D.; Walker, K. Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. J. Res. Nurs. 2020, 25, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Suen, L.-J.W.; Huang, H.-M.; Lee, H.-H. A comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. J. Nurs. 2014, 61, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kim, Y.J.; Kim, W.G.; Choi, H.-M.; Phetvaroon, K. The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 76, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Van Nguyen, L.T.; Lu, V.N.; Hill, S.R.; Conduit, J. The Mediating Role of Brand Knowledge on Employees’ Brand Citizenship Behavior: Does Organizational Tenure Matter? Australas. Mark. J. 2019, 27, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ng, T.W.H.; Yam, K.C.; Aguinis, H. Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Pers. Psychol. 2019, 72, 107–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Long, C.S.; Thean, L.Y.; Wan Ismail, W.K.; Jusoh, A. Leadership Styles and Employees’ Turnover Intention: Exploratory Study of Academic Staff in a Malaysian College. World Appl. Sci. J. 2012, 19, 575. [Google Scholar]
  74. Chou, C.-J. Hotels’ environmental policies and employee personal environmental beliefs: Interactions and outcomes. Tour. Manag. 2014, 40, 436–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Pavlova, A.; Finland; Salminen, H.; Mattila, M. Human resource management for sustainable development in the manufacturing industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 180, 106037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wenström, S.; Uusiautti, S.; Maatta, K. How does the PRIDE theory describe leadership and organization that enhances vocational education teachers’ (VET) enthusiasm? An analysis of enthusiastic Finnish VET-teachers perceptions. Eur. J. Workplace Innov. 2018, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Arda, O.A.; Delen, D.; Tatoglu, E.; Zaim, S. An analytic approach to assessing organizational citizenship behavior. Decis. Support Syst. 2017, 103, 9–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tan, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Yang, H.; Song, S.; Xie, X.; Yu, Z. Turnover intention and coping strategies among older nursing assistants in China: A qualitative study. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1269611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Perey, R. Making sense of sustainability through an individual interview narrative. Cult. Organ. 2015, 21, 147–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2012, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gioia, D.A.; Corley, K.G.; Hamilton, A.L. Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 2013, 16, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Denzin, N.K. Triangulation 2.0. J. Mix. Methods Res. 2012, 6, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  84. Ajemba, M.N.; Arene, E.C. Possible advantages that may be enhanced with the adoption of research triangulation or mixed methodology. Magna Sci. Adv. Res. Rev. 2022, 6, 058–061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vaske, J.J.; Beaman, J.; Sponarski, C.C. Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach’s Alpha. Leis. Sci. 2016, 39, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Danks, N.P.; Ray, S. A Primer on Partial Least Squares (PLS) Structural Equation Modeling; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hu, L.-T.; Bentler, P.M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 1998, 3, 424–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Maior, C.S.; Mantovani, D.; Pinto, D.C.; Ferreira, M.B. Green pride in sustainable versus premium brand decisions. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2022, 40, 821–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Onwezen, M.C.; Bartels, J.; Antonides, G. Environmentally friendly consumer choices: Cultural differences in the self-regulatory function of anticipated pride and guilt. J. Environ. Psychol. 2014, 40, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bissing-Olson, M.J.; Fielding, K.S.; Iyer, A. Experiences of pride, not guilt, predict pro-environmental behavior when pro-environmental descriptive norms are more positive. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, S.B.; Liu, S.-H.; Maertz, C.P.; Singh, N.; Fisher, J. A mechanism for employees’ brand citizenship behavior (BCB) and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM): The divergent moderating effects of horizontal collectivism. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2023, 32, 1123–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ajzen, I. Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  93. Ilyas, M.A.; Adeel, I.; Alshuaibi, A.S.I.; Shaari, H. Conceptualizing the relationship between employer brand pride, employer brand reputation, employee engagement and employee brand loyalty. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Change 2019, 7, 346–361. [Google Scholar]
  94. Brown, E.S.; Palka, J.M.; Helm, S.; Kulikova, A. The relative significance of reputation and pride in the forecasting employee turnover within an academic Medical Center. Health Care Manag. Rev. 2022, 47, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Alam, A.; Asim, M. Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Stud. 2019, 9, 163–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Aftab, J.; Abid, N.; Cucari, N.; Savastano, M. Green human resource management and environmental performance: The role of green innovation and environmental strategy in a developing country. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2023, 32, 1782–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Aftab, J.; Veneziani, M. How does green human resource management contribute to saving the environment? Evidence of emerging market manufacturing firms. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2024, 33, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Sustainability 16 06528 g001
Figure 2. Interaction plot for moderation effect on M1.
Figure 2. Interaction plot for moderation effect on M1.
Sustainability 16 06528 g002
Figure 3. Interaction plot for moderation effect on M2.
Figure 3. Interaction plot for moderation effect on M2.
Sustainability 16 06528 g003
Table 1. Measurement model.
Table 1. Measurement model.
ConstructsIndicatorsStandardized LoadingsCRαRho AAVE
Green human resource management practices (GHRs)GHR10.8510.8070.9100.8460.583
GHR20.840
GHR30.821
GHR40.733
GHR50.745
GHR60.819
Organizational pride (OP)OP10.7310.8140.8230.8090.642
OP20.833
OP30.919
OP40.703
Brand citizenship behavior (BCB)BCB10.8450.8740.8430.8670.733
BCB20.826
BCB30.871
BCB40.747
BCB50.788
BCB60.706
BCB70.896
Employee turnover intention (ETI)ETI10.8250.8010.8290.8420.723
ETI20.841
ETI30.756
Individual green values (IGV)IGV10.8860.7730.7560.7210.679
IGV20.704
IGV30.892
Table 2. Heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HT-MT).
Table 2. Heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HT-MT).
GHROPBCBETI
GHR
OP0.711
BCB0.6040.628
ETI0.7050.6110.743
IGV0.6800.8020.5790.554
Table 3. Structural model assessment and hypotheses testing.
Table 3. Structural model assessment and hypotheses testing.
EffectsRelationsßt-StatisticsF2Decision
H1GHR → OP0.3045.205 ***0.114Supported
H2OP → BCB0.3095.362 ***0.118Supported
H3OP → ETI−0.204−2.971 **0.086Supported
H4GHR×IGV → OP0.4096.797 ***0.159Supported
H5OP×IGV → BCB0.4126.834 ***0.156Supported
R2OP = 0.37/Q2OP = 0.17; R2BCB = 0.47/Q2BCB = 0.26; R2ETI = 0.61/Q2ETI = 0.37; SRMR: 0.021; NFI: 0.931; 0.01 **, 0.001 ***.
Table 4. Characteristics and responses for GHRM open questions.
Table 4. Characteristics and responses for GHRM open questions.
CharacteristicQuotes
Green Initiatives
Importance of Green Initiatives
Manager’s Role
Q1.P1: “We are sensitive to plastic waste, and we recycle so that it does not cause any harm to the environment.”
Q1.P3: “Recently, we established a water refining station to enhance our sustainability efforts.”
Q1.P6: “Neither the company nor the government really care about the environment.”
Q2.P1: “Through these actions, we ensure the satisfaction of our neighbors while minimizing disruptions.”
Q2.P8: “These activities are the company’s public face in the community.
Q3.P3: “The management responsibilities involve the planning of the budget to be used in executing these processes and laying out financial strategies for these processes.”
Q3.P7: “We must lead by example for our workers as we take this first step.”
Table 5. Themes and quotes on organizational pride.
Table 5. Themes and quotes on organizational pride.
CharacteristicsQuotes
Work Description and Inspiration IncentivesQ4. P1: “In our workplace, open communication flourishes, such that everyone’s views are considered, which improves our organizational culture.”
Q4. P1: “I take pride in my work, particularly in the industrial field; it is not a form of employment to me.”
Q4. P2: “Our company promotes teamwork, and hence everyone supports each other like a family, which helps our work culture a lot.”
Q4. P7: “Our organization offers equal pay and is also reputed to be a company in society, with an ISO certificate.”
Positive Practices
Interaction and Collaboration
Q5. P2: “Participation in activities including exhibitions or even events related to societal issues shows our commitment to making a positive impact.”
Q5. P3: “We prioritize sustainable development to ensure a brighter tomorrow.”
Q5. P7: “We do value innovation and new ideas.”
Q6. P6: “Group working is almost non-existent; people work for their own benefit.”
Q6. P5: “It definitely increases productivity by leveraging diverse skills.”
Q6. P8: “I can’t deny that collective performance surpasses individual one.”
Table 6. Themes and quotes on brand citizenship behavior.
Table 6. Themes and quotes on brand citizenship behavior.
CharacteristicQuotes
General Experience and Perception to Support Brand ImageQ7. P1: “Word of mouth remains a powerful tool for us, to enhance our reputation among customers.”
Q7. P3: “Dedication to work and commitment are important, so committed employees help to deliver exceptional service.”
Q7. P5: “Leveraging social media allows us to engage with a broader audience.”
Q7. P6: “Quality of product is crucial to us.”
Q7. P7: “post-sales services have undeniable significance to our customer satisfaction
Q7. P8: “Transparency in operations is key to maintaining trust and loyalty among our customers.”
Positive Practices and Methods to Enhance Brand ReputationQ8. P2: “Participating in exhibitions enables us to showcase our products and can help with this.”
Q8. P3: “We recognize that our employees are the face of our company, and we prioritize their training and support to keep customers satisfied.”
Q8. P5: “Expanding our marketing helps us reach new audiences.”
Table 7. Characteristics and responses for turnover intention open questions.
Table 7. Characteristics and responses for turnover intention open questions.
CharacteristicQuotes
Job SatisfactionQ9. P2: “feeling secure is essential to maintain employee satisfaction.”
Q9. P4: “Creating a healthy environment is vital for promoting employee well-being and maintaining a positive workplace culture.”
Q9. P5: “Fostering a professional and inclusive work environment is essential for employee satisfaction and retention.”
Q9. P7: “Offering competitive salaries and benefits is crucial.”
Consideration of LeavingQ10. P3: “I weigh my work-life balance when contemplating whether to stay or leave my current role.”
Q10. P5: “I carefully evaluate the compensations and benefits offered to me, as they play a vital role in my decision-making process.”
Q10. P8: “The level of job satisfaction is a significant factor.”
Managing Intention to LeaveQ11. P1: “As a manager, I assess the issue and actively work to solve it before any employee decides to leave the organization.”
Q11. P6: “Staying or leaving depend on various issues.”
Q11. P7: “Employee feedback is important to keep their voices heard.”
Addressing DifficultiesQ12. P1: “Adaptation is a key in addition to finding creative solutions.”
Q12. P2: “Sometimes, a person should ignore minor issues that don’t have a deep impact.”
Q12. P5: “I evaluate the problem, and I try to think of an acceptable solution.”
Table 8. Characteristics and responses for IGVs open questions.
Table 8. Characteristics and responses for IGVs open questions.
CharacteristicQuotes
Suggestions for SustainabilityQ13. P1: “We work on implementing and enhancing our green strategies throughout our operations to reduce our environmental footprint.”
Q13. P2: “The best way is to partner with environmental organizations.”
Q13. P6: “When I went to the work domain, nobody cared about these activities.”
Q13. P7: “Using economizers to minimize resource consumption.”
Nature of these SuggestionsQ14. P1: “Reviewing and updating our green policies is imperative.”
Q14. P5: “Implementing a plastic recycling program to reduce plastic waste.”
Q14. P2: “Installing a water refining system to manage water consumption.”
Q14. P8: “Advocating for renewable energy adoption.”
Significance of Green SuggestionsQ15. P1: “Encouraging everyone to contribute green suggestions fosters environmental responsibility.”
Q15. P2: “Involving all members taps into diverse ideas for more sustainable practices.”
Q15. P4: “Some suggestions may not impact managerial roles.”
Q15. P5: “These suggestions are important for both environment and employees.”
Q15. P8: “People think about how to overcome economic and health issues over the environment.”
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hajj Hussein, S.; Bou Zakhem, N. The Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Brand Citizenship Behavior and Employee Turnover Intention: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156528

AMA Style

Hajj Hussein S, Bou Zakhem N. The Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Brand Citizenship Behavior and Employee Turnover Intention: A Mixed Methods Approach. Sustainability. 2024; 16(15):6528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hajj Hussein, Safaa, and Najib Bou Zakhem. 2024. "The Impact of Green Human Resource Management Practices on Brand Citizenship Behavior and Employee Turnover Intention: A Mixed Methods Approach" Sustainability 16, no. 15: 6528. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16156528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop