Sustainable Energy and Semiconductors: A Bibliometric Investigation

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This manuscript conducted a literature study about the semiconductor materials on energy and sustainable development. The research involved a large amount of literatures, and the research content is interesting. The research results have positive significance for summarizing and predicting the research achievements and development direction of semiconductor materials. We suggest optimizing the manuscript in the following areas:

(1) The abstract and conclusion sections of the manuscript are too lengthy, and the author needs to streamline them;

(2) The quality of the images in this manuscript needs to be improved, especially Figures 2 to 5.

(3) It is suggested that the author analyze the distribution of research countries.

(4) When analyzing data, the author should not simply list the data in the Figures, but also analyze the reasons for such data trends.

(5) For  literature analytical papers, the author should provide a prediction of the development direction of the discipline by analyzing existing data.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The English language expression of the manuscript is moderate, and it requires appropriate language editing

Author Response

• The abstract and conclusion sections of the manuscript are too lengthy, and the author needs to streamline them;

Response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We appreciate your input and agree that the abstract and conclusion sections can be made more concise to enhance clarity and readability. We will revise these sections to streamline the content, ensuring that the key points are communicated effectively without unnecessary detail. This will improve the overall flow of the manuscript and make it more accessible to readers. Thank you again for your constructive suggestions.

• The quality of the images in this manuscript needs to be improved, especially Figures 2 to 5.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We acknowledge the importance of high-quality images for the clarity and impact of our manuscript. We will ensure that Figures 2 to 5 are updated with higher-resolution versions. Additionally, we will enhance the visual quality of these images to ensure they are clear, and detailed, and effectively support the findings and discussions presented in the manuscript.

• It is suggested that the author analyze the distribution of research countries.

Response: Thank you for your valuable suggestion to analyze the distribution of research countries. In response, we have created Figure 6, which provides a detailed analysis of the top 20 countries contributing to research in semiconductor sustainability. We believe this analysis provides a comprehensive view of the international landscape in semiconductor sustainability research, emphasizing the collaborative and global nature of advancements in this critical area.

• When analyzing data, the author should not simply list the data in the Figures, but also analyze the reasons for such data trends.

Response: Thank you for your insightful feedback. We agree that merely listing data is insufficient and that a deeper analysis of the underlying reasons for observed trends is essential for a comprehensive understanding. By including these analyses, we aim to provide a richer context for the data trends, enhancing the manuscript's overall value and insight. We appreciate your suggestion and will ensure that the revised manuscript with blue font is accompanied by thorough interpretations and discussions of the data trends.

• For literature analytical papers, the author should provide a prediction of the development direction of the discipline by analyzing existing data.

Response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We agree that providing a prediction of the discipline's development direction based on the existing data will enhance the comprehensiveness of our literature analysis. In the revised with blue font, we will include a section that forecasts future trends in semiconductor research for sustainability. This prediction will be informed by our analysis of existing data, identifying emerging themes and areas with significant growth potential.

• The English language expression of the manuscript is moderate, and it requires appropriate language editing

Response: We appreciate the reviewer's feedback regarding the language expression in our manuscript. We acknowledge that ensuring clarity and precision in language is crucial for effective communication. We have taken note of this suggestion and will ensure that the manuscript undergoes appropriate language editing to enhance readability and coherence. This will include thorough proofreading and editing to refine the English language expression throughout the document. We are committed to improving the quality of our manuscript to meet the standards expected for publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors talk about an important topic but there are some points need to be clarified.

1. The abstract is weak and needs to be rewritten in a more attractive way to show the importance of your work. Also the conclusion.

2. More mathematical background and explanations are needed.

3. The novelty of the work is not clear. 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

be clarified.

1. The abstract is weak and needs to be rewritten in a more attractive way to show the importance of your work. Also the conclusion.

2. More mathematical background and explanations are needed.

3. The novelty of the work is not clear. 

Author Response

• The abstract is weak and needs to be rewritten in a more attractive way to show the importance of your work. Also the conclusion.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We will revise the abstract and conclusion to better highlight the significance of our findings on sustainability and energy management within the semiconductor industry. This will include emphasizing key insights and implications more effectively. Your input is valuable in improving these sections to enhance the clarity and impact of our manuscript.

• More mathematical background and explanations are needed.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We will incorporate more detailed mathematical background and explanations in the manuscript to better support our analyses and findings. This will include providing clear explanations of the methodologies used in our study, ensuring that readers can fully understand the analytical framework employed.

• The novelty of the work is not clear. 

Response: Thank you for your observation regarding the novelty of our work. We recognize the importance of clearly communicating the unique contributions of our study. Our research is novel in several key aspects:

Comprehensive Temporal Analysis: We provide a detailed, time-segmented analysis of trends in the semiconductor industry from 2010 to the present, specifically focusing on sustainability and energy management. This approach reveals how research priorities have evolved over time, highlighting significant shifts and emerging areas of interest.

Advanced Bibliometric Techniques: By employing keyword co-occurrence networks and time series visualization, our study utilizes advanced bibliometric methods to map the intellectual landscape of semiconductor research. This methodological approach offers nuanced insights into the connections and developments within the field.

Interdisciplinary Focus: Our work bridges semiconductor technology with sustainability and energy management, providing a holistic view of how these critical areas intersect. This interdisciplinary focus contributes to a deeper understanding of how semiconductor innovations can support global sustainability goals.

We will revise the manuscript to more explicitly emphasize these novel contributions, ensuring that the unique aspects of our study are clearly articulated.

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors presents the article entitled “Sustainable Energy and Semiconductors: A Bibliometric Investigation”. However, the manuscript presents the following concerns:

 

Reduce the length of the summary to less than 250 words.

 

Add hyperlinks to references, figures and tables.

 

At the end of the introduction add the structure of the manuscript.

 

Add a brief introduction or description between sections and subsections.

 

The authors mention that they rely on reviews to carry out their bibliographic review, which is the case. What is the contribution of including works that are responsible for carrying out a bibliographic review similar to the one proposed?

 

In the methodology, please mention how many works were found in total, what the exclusion criteria were and how many remained at the end of each criterion.

 

Improve the quality of the Figures.

 

There are several acronyms that are defined at multiple points in the manuscript.

 

The authors mention that only articles, reviews and conference papers are included, however in Figure 3 there are multiple types of writings.

 

In subsection 4.3, the authors mention that some institutions produce and collaborate in topics related to semiconductors. I recommend to describe what work has been carried out in these institutions related to semiconductors.

 

What key research trends and collaboration patterns were identified in the study?

 

How does semiconductor research contribute to the United Nations' global sustainability goals, specifically in relation to energy efficiency and the use of clean energy?

What major themes were identified in the cluster analysis of semiconductor research, and how are they critical to transforming the energy sector?

Author Response

• Reduce the length of the summary to less than 250 words.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the summary key findings to reduce its length to less than 250 words, ensuring it remains concise while conveying the key points of our research.

 

• Add hyperlinks to references, figures and tables.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We have added hyperlinks to all references, figures, and tables in the final version of the manuscript to enhance navigation and accessibility for readers. Please note that during the editing process, the structure and paths may change, but we will ensure that the hyperlinks are correctly updated if the manuscript is published.

 

• At the end of the introduction add the structure of the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We have added a section at the end of the introduction outlining the structure of the manuscript. This addition provides readers with a clear roadmap of the content and organization of the paper.

• Add a brief introduction or description between sections and subsections.

Response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We have revised the manuscript to include brief introductions or descriptions between sections and subsections. These additions provide context and facilitate a smoother transition between different parts of the manuscript, enhancing overall readability and coherence.

 

• The authors mention that they rely on reviews to carry out their bibliographic review, which is the case. What is the contribution of including works that are responsible for carrying out a bibliographic review similar to the one proposed?

Response: Thank you for your insightful comment regarding the inclusion of review papers in our bibliographic review. We understand the importance of clarifying the contribution of including such works and would like to provide further elaboration on this aspect. The inclusion of review papers in our bibliometric analysis significantly enhances the depth, accuracy, and comprehensiveness of our study. It ensures that our analysis is grounded in a thorough understanding of the existing literature, validates our findings, and provides a solid foundation for identifying future research directions. We believe that this approach not only strengthens our study but also offers valuable insights that contribute meaningfully to the field of semiconductor sustainability research. Thank you for your constructive feedback. We hope this explanation clarifies the rationale and contributions of including review papers in our bibliographic review.

 

• In the methodology, please mention how many works were found in total, what the exclusion criteria were and how many remained at the end of each criterion.

Response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. Here is a concise response addressing your concern regarding the methodology and inclusion of works. We conducted a search in the Web of Science Core Collection database using terms like Figure 1 with 4638 documents in 1990-2023

• Improve the quality of the Figures.

Response: Thank you for your valuable feedback. We acknowledge your concern regarding the quality of the figures in our manuscript. We have taken steps to address this issue by enhancing the resolution and clarity of Figures 2 to 5. The improved figures now provide a more accurate and detailed visualization of our data, ensuring better readability and interpretation.

• There are several acronyms that are defined at multiple points in the manuscript.

Response: Thank you for pointing out the repetition in defining acronyms throughout the manuscript. We have carefully reviewed the document and ensured that each acronym is defined only once at its first occurrence. This change improves readability and avoids redundancy, providing a clearer and more concise presentation.

• The authors mention that only articles, reviews and conference papers are included, however in Figure 3 there are multiple types of writings.

Response: Thank you for highlighting the discrepancy regarding the types of writings included in our analysis. We acknowledge that our initial description was not clear enough. While we focused primarily on articles, reviews, and conference papers, other document types such as book chapters, editorials, and notes were also inadvertently included in the dataset presented in Figure 3. We have revised the text to accurately reflect the inclusion criteria and to ensure consistency between the narrative and the figures. We appreciate your careful review and believe this correction will improve the clarity and accuracy of our manuscript.

• In subsection 4.3, the authors mention that some institutions produce and collaborate in topics related to semiconductors. I recommend describing what work has been carried out in these institutions related to semiconductors.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion to provide a more detailed description of the work carried out by key institutions related to semiconductor research. We agree that elaborating on the specific contributions of these institutions will add valuable context to our analysis. In subsection 4.3, we will describe the notable projects and research initiatives at these institutions.

• What key research trends and collaboration patterns were identified in the study?

Response: Thank you for your query regarding the identification of key research trends and collaboration patterns in our study. Below, we provide a concise summary of these findings:

Global Collaboration: The analysis reveals extensive international collaboration among researchers and institutions. Key hubs of activity include the Chinese Academy of Sciences, MIT, and Stanford University, which frequently collaborate with institutions across various countries, fostering a global exchange of knowledge and innovation

Interdisciplinary Research: Collaboration across different fields, such as materials science, engineering, and environmental science, is prevalent. This interdisciplinary approach is essential for addressing the complex challenges at the intersection of semiconductor technology and sustainability

Institutional Networks: Leading institutions often serve as central nodes in collaborative networks, facilitating numerous joint research projects and publications. These institutions play a pivotal role in driving forward the research agenda on semiconductor sustainability

• How does semiconductor research contribute to the United Nations' global sustainability goals, specifically in relation to energy efficiency and the use of clean energy?

Response: Thank you for your question about the contribution of semiconductor research to the United Nations' sustainability goals, specifically regarding energy efficiency and clean energy. Semiconductor research supports several UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For SDG 7: Affordable and Clean Energy, advances in semiconductor technologies enhance energy efficiency in devices and systems, reducing overall energy consumption. Semiconductors are also crucial for improving the efficiency and reducing the cost of photovoltaic cells for solar energy. For SDG 9: Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure, research leads to more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly manufacturing processes. Integrating AI and machine learning optimizes resource usage and minimizes waste. For SDG 13: Climate Action, enhancing energy efficiency in semiconductor technologies helps lower carbon emissions, aiding climate change mitigation. Interdisciplinary collaborations between academia, industry, and government ensure that semiconductor advancements are both innovative and practical. These efforts facilitate the development of essential solutions for achieving global sustainability goals

• What major themes were identified in the cluster analysis of semiconductor research, and how are they critical to transforming the energy sector?

Response: The cluster analysis of semiconductor research identifies several key themes critical to transforming the energy sector which is shown in Figure 8. The Yellow Cluster focuses on optimizing manufacturing processes and supply chains with AI to enhance efficiency and reduce energy use. The Red Cluster emphasizes developing energy-efficient devices using advanced materials like silicon carbide and gallium nitride, crucial for renewable energy applications. The Green Cluster highlights semiconductor technologies in sustainable energy solutions, particularly in solar cells and photocatalysis, aiming to harness renewable energy sources. The Blue Cluster underscores the use of life cycle assessment to evaluate and mitigate the environmental impacts of semiconductor technologies. The Purple Cluster focuses on advancements in sensor technology and interface engineering, enhancing energy management and environmental monitoring. Together, these themes support the development of efficient, renewable, and sustainable energy technologies, significantly contributing to the energy sector's transformation

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Author Response

• The authors can explain the key trends and collaborative patterns identified in the study regarding the role of semiconductors in energy sustainability from 1999 to 2023, and how do they inform future research and policy development?

Response: Thank you for your comment. Our bibliometric analysis highlights key trends and collaboration patterns in the semiconductor industry's role in energy sustainability from 1999 to 2023. These trends and patterns inform future research and policy development in several ways: 1) The multidisciplinary nature of the research suggests a need for policies encouraging cross-sector collaboration; 2) Aligning semiconductor research with SDGs highlights the need for policies incentivizing sustainable practices; 3) The extensive international collaboration network indicates the importance of fostering global partnerships; 4) The evolution of research themes suggests a need for policies supporting advanced semiconductor technologies for sustainable energy applications; 5) The involvement of both academic institutions and industry players highlights the importance of facilitating industry-academia partnerships; 6) The growing focus on environmental impact calls for policies promoting eco-friendly practices; and 7) The consistent emphasis on energy applications suggests a need for policies encouraging energy-efficient semiconductor technologies.

• How do interdisciplinary efforts across fields such as engineering, physics, materials science, and chemistry contribute to advancements in semiconductor technologies for sustainable energy applications?

Response: Our bibliometric analysis reveals significant interdisciplinary efforts in semiconductor research for sustainable energy applications. The study shows major contributions from Figure 4. This interdisciplinary approach enables comprehensive problem-solving, as the complex challenges require diverse expertise with each field contributing unique insights. Innovation often occurs at the intersections of disciplines, as evidenced by our keyword cluster analysis. The involvement of multiple disciplines ensures a more holistic approach to sustainability, addressing both technological advancements and environmental concerns. Collaboration between theoretical and applied sciences facilitates faster translation of fundamental discoveries into practical applications. This interdisciplinary research contributes to multiple Sustainable Development Goals simultaneously, extending beyond just energy sustainability. The diverse perspectives from different fields lead to enhanced problem definition and more effective solutions. Additionally, we observe methodological cross-pollination, where techniques from one field find novel applications in others, enhancing overall research methodologies. In conclusion, this interdisciplinary approach is crucial for driving meaningful advancements in sustainable semiconductor technologies, enabling a holistic approach to complex challenges and ensuring alignment with broader sustainability goals.

• The authors can discuss the significance of aligning semiconductor research with specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) such as Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7), Clean Water and Sanitation (SDG 6), and Good Health and Well-Being (SDG 3). Provide examples of semiconductor applications that address these goals.

Response: Thank you for your feedback. We have revised the manuscript to address the alignment of semiconductor research with specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and provided relevant examples.

Affordable and Clean Energy (SDG 7): Semiconductor research enhances energy efficiency and renewable energy. Advances in materials like silicon and gallium nitride improve solar panels and LED lighting, reducing energy consumption.

Clean Water and Sanitation (SDG 6): Semiconductors are used in water purification and environmental monitoring. For instance, titanium dioxide aids in photocatalytic water treatment, and semiconductor sensors monitor water quality.

Good Health and Well-Being (SDG 3): Semiconductor technologies support medical diagnostics and health monitoring. They are crucial in imaging devices (X-rays, MRI) and wearable health monitors, improving patient care and preventive health.

• The authors can analyze the role of key institutions like the Chinese Academy of Sciences, MIT, and Stanford University in fostering global collaborations for semiconductor-driven energy sustainability. What are the implications of these collaborations for knowledge exchange and innovation?

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have analyzed the role of key institutions in fostering global collaborations for semiconductor-driven energy sustainability. Collaborations between these institutions promote the sharing of expertise and resources, leading to accelerated advancements in semiconductor technologies. They create a platform for interdisciplinary research and the integration of diverse perspectives. Joint efforts drive innovation by combining cutting-edge research with practical applications. These collaborations enable the development of novel solutions that address global energy sustainability challenges, thereby influencing industry practices and policy development.

• The authors can explain the thematic areas revealed by the clustering analysis of semiconductor industry keywords. How do these clusters (Yellow, Red, Green, Blue, and Purple) represent different aspects of semiconductor research and their impact on energy sustainability?

Response: In the context of clustering keywords like Yellow, Red, Green, Blue, and Purple clusters, VOSviewer can cluster these keywords based on their co-occurrence patterns in the following ways. Keyword extracts from bibliographic records or research articles. This involves identifying and listing keywords used in the literature. We analyze how often pairs of keywords appear together in the same documents. This co-occurrence data is used to determine the strength of relationships between keywords. Then, we apply clustering algorithms to group keywords based on their co-occurrence data. The algorithm groups keywords that frequently appear together into clusters. Each cluster is assigned a color and is represented a specific thematic area or research focus. For example, Yellow might be related to manufacturing processes, while Green might focus on energy applications.

• The authors could you evaluate the contributions of semiconductor research to sustainable manufacturing practices within the context of Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure (SDG 9) and Responsible Consumption and Production (SDG 12).

Response: Semiconductor research significantly contributes to sustainable manufacturing by advancing technologies that improve efficiency and reduce waste, aligning with Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure (SDG 9). Innovations such as energy-efficient semiconductor devices and optimized manufacturing processes support more responsible consumption and production practices (SDG 12). These developments help lower energy use and resource consumption, thereby promoting environmentally responsible practices in the semiconductor industry.

• The authors can you explain what are the potential socioeconomic impacts of semiconductor research on Education (SDG 4) and Economic Growth (SDG). Provide examples of how semiconductor technologies can address challenges in these areas.

Response: For Education (SDG 4), advancements in semiconductor technologies enable the development of innovative educational tools and platforms, such as high-performance computers and interactive digital learning systems, which enhance learning experiences and accessibility. Regarding Economic Growth (SDG 8), semiconductor innovations drive technological advancements that fuel new industries and job creation. For instance, improvements in semiconductor efficiency lead to the development of cutting-edge electronics, supporting growth in sectors like consumer electronics, telecommunications, and automotive industries. These technologies not only bolster economic development but also enhance productivity and competitiveness in various sectors

 

• The authors can explain in detail regarding the environmental and energy efficiency advancements facilitated by machine learning in semiconductor manufacturing as highlighted in the Yellow Cluster. What are the potential benefits and challenges of these advancements?

Response: Machine learning (ML) advancements in semiconductor manufacturing, highlighted in the Yellow Cluster, improve environmental and energy efficiency by optimizing processes, reducing waste, and enhancing yield rates. ML models predict and prevent equipment failures, thus minimizing downtime and energy consumption. They also analyze energy patterns for better management. However, challenges include high implementation costs, data privacy concerns, and the need for specialized expertise. Poor data quality can lead to inaccurate predictions, affecting the effectiveness of ML applications. Addressing these issues is essential for realizing the full benefits of ML in semiconductor manufacturing.

• The authors can examine the role of advanced material research in renewable energy applications as emphasized in the Red Cluster. How do chemical processes in semiconductors contribute to these applications?

Response: Advanced material research in the Red Cluster significantly impacts renewable energy applications by improving efficiency and enabling new technologies. Innovations in semiconductor materials, such as silicon carbide and gallium nitride, enhance the performance of energy conversion devices like solar cells and LEDs. These materials, through advanced chemical processes, contribute to the development of efficient photovoltaic cells and energy storage systems. They also increase the durability of devices in harsh conditions, supporting sustainable energy infrastructure. These advancements are essential for capturing, converting, and storing renewable energy, thereby aiding the transition to cleaner energy sources.

• At last, authors can explain how do sensing and interface technologies, as highlighted in the Purple Cluster, innovate sensor technology for improved energy efficiency and environmental monitoring? What are the broader implications of these innovations for environmental stewardship?

Response: Our analysis of the Purple Cluster reveals significant innovations in semiconductor-based sensing and interface technologies. These advancements enable more precise, energy-efficient, and real-time environmental monitoring, while facilitating integration with smart systems. The implications for environmental stewardship are substantial, including enhanced environmental protection, improved resource management, data-driven decision making, citizen empowerment in environmental monitoring, increased industrial sustainability, and support for climate change mitigation efforts. These innovations not only improve our ability to monitor and manage environmental conditions but also contribute to more sustainable practices across various sectors of society.

• In the present review article, there is a lack of references in the introduction part. Authors should include the below articles to strengthen your review article enormously, and it could be reflected in the revised version.

Response: We appreciate the reviewer's valuable feedback regarding the lack of references in the introduction. We agree that providing stronger evidence to support our claims is essential. We will carefully incorporate the suggested new articles into the introduction to enhance the overall strength and clarity of our arguments. We believe that this addition will significantly improve the quality of the review.

• The authors should carefully check the references cited in the manuscript.
  References should be corrected as per the journal format.
  a) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108433.

10. b) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109299.
11. c) https://doi.org/10.3390/ nano13061049.

 

10. d) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109096.
11. e) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.109405.
12. f) https://doi.org/10.1039/D4DT00905C

Response: We thank the reviewer for pointing out the potential issue with the references. We have conducted a thorough review of all cited references to ensure accuracy and consistency. Any errors or inconsistencies found have been corrected. We have also double-checked the format of all references to adhere to the journal's guidelines. We appreciate the reviewer's attention to detail and believe that these corrections have significantly improved the overall quality of the manuscript.

 

 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The author carefully revised the manuscript based on the comments of the reviewers. After revision, the quality of the manuscript has greatly improved and reached the level of acceptance. It is recommended to accept it.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

After revision, the English expression has been greatly improved, and the entire manuscript is expressed clearly.

Author Response

• The author carefully revised the manuscript based on the comments of the reviewers. After revision, the quality of the manuscript has greatly improved and reached the level of acceptance. It is recommended to accept it.

Response: Thank you for your positive feedback and recommendation for acceptance. I appreciate the constructive comments from all the reviewers, which have greatly contributed to enhancing the quality of the manuscript

• After revision, the English expression has been greatly improved, and the entire manuscript is expressed clearly

Response: Thank you for your feedback. I'm pleased to hear that the revisions have significantly improved the clarity and overall English expression of the manuscript. Your comments were instrumental in achieving this improvement.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The paper is in a good shape now

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing 

Author Response

• The paper is in a good shape now
• Minor editing

Response: Thank you for your positive feedback. I'm glad to hear that the paper is in good shape. I will address the minor editing suggestions promptly to ensure the manuscript meets the highest standards.

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors addressed all my concerns. However, please check the following points:

-I suggest to add the x-axis title to Figure 2. Same for Fig. 5.

-Remove frames from Figures 2, 3 and 4.

-Please vectorize Figures 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 (last figure).

-Please fix the numberation because Figure 8 appears twice. Also, please mention the last figure in the main text.

After this, the manuscript will be ready for publication.

Author Response

Thank you for your detailed suggestions. I will make the following revisions to the manuscript:

1. Add titles to the x-axis for Figures 2 and 5.
2. Remove the frames from Figures 2, 3, and 4.
3. Vectorize Figures 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and the last figure.
4. Correct the numbering issue where Figure 8 appears twice and transfer Figure 8 in last by Figure 9.

I appreciate your attention to these details and will implement these changes promptly.

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

accept

Author Response

Accept

Response: Thank you for your recommendation to accept the manuscript. I appreciate your feedback and the time you have taken to review the paper.