The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Literature Survey and Review Process
- Step-1: Literature Retrieval
- Step-2: Literature Filtering
- Step-3: Classification
- Through this article, we have extensively covered in detail the potential 6G technologies in terms of requirements, architecture, visions, and usage, which are anticipated to be integrated in futuristic 6G-enabled smart cities.
- Secondly, we have discussed prominent smart city applications with underlying 6G technologies. This includes smart waste management, smart healthcare, smart grids, and more.
- Thirdly, potential challenges are also highlighted along with discussion on each technology and application. Also, at the end of this survey paper, challenges and suggestions for possible future research directions are also highlighted for the 6G-enabled smart city paradigm.
- Research Objectives
- Structure of Paper
2. Potential 6G Enabling Technologies
2.1. Role of AI in 6G and Smart City Arena
2.1.1. Applications
- (a)
- AI for integrating various wireless technologies
- (b)
- AI for adapting to ever-changing wireless environments
- (c)
- AI for channel estimation
- (d)
- AI for handling scalability issues
- (e)
- AI for modulation recognition
- (f)
- AI for traffic prediction
- (g)
- AI for radio resource management
- (h)
- AI for mobility management
- (i)
- Deep learning-enabled 6G physical layer (PHY) architecture
- (j)
- AI-based data caching
- (k)
- AI for energy management
2.1.2. Challenges
- (a)
- High demand of servers at edge—Firstly, artificial intelligence tasks require heavy computational processes that run on task-customized servers. In the decentralized learning approach, most of these tasks are performed on servers located at the network’s edge. To minimize the demand of servers at the edge, more effective machine learning algorithms need to be explored.
- (b)
- Energy consumption—Energy consumption in 6G IoT devices needs to be reduced. One way to address this issue is by devising an efficient energy supply method with an innovative signal processing model. Moreover, AI and ML algorithms are complex and computationally intensive and consume a lot of energy. So there is also a need to develop algorithms that are more efficient and suitable for small IoT devices.
- (c)
- Large training data requirement—Acquisition of a large training dataset is a prime prerequisite for an enhanced deep learning system. But fetching large-scale training samples poses challenge owing to the high cost of resources and time required for training datasets.
- (d)
- Security and privacy—Smart city networks demand reexamining the cyber-security framework to enable enhanced security in wireless networks, especially when sensitive data are involved [93,94]. The possibility of vulnerabilities in networks has increased with the phenomenal surge in the number of IoT devices [95], so more research efforts will be required to make AI-enabled 6G networks more secure from malicious attacks.
2.2. Role of Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) in Smart City Concept
2.2.1. Applications
- (a)
- Localization applications: There are certain applications that demand high-precision localization accuracy, for example, hazardous or critical targets that may involve human lives, like pedestrians [96,102]. For such localization-intensive applications in smart cities, a base station can utilize its joint sensing and communication resources. With higher bandwidth, the 6G ISAC system can support better tracking and localization performance, and for outdoor use cases, it can provide localization accuracy down to the centimeter level. For vehicular applications, when two or more entities approach each another, it is important to have high accuracy in relative localization. In applications related to automatic warehousing, centimeter-level accuracy facilitates device-level placement, enabling efficient and accurate placement of components that have a minute form factor. Under these circumstances, localization has assumed a central role in the ISAC-based smart city arena, and can be accomplished using various techniques such as RSS methods, time difference of arrival (TDOA), and angle of arrival (AOA) [103,104].
- (b)
- Gesture and activity recognition: Another ISAC-based application is in gesture and activity recognition in the smart city scenario. ISAC systems utilize high bandwidth, which enables high resolution and clarity in capturing gestures, and creates a wide range of applications using gesture and activity capturing techniques. This technique has a particular advantage over contemporary camera-based techniques in protecting privacy and personal information, as it limits the exposure of humans involved. This application can also be used as a security feature in intrusion detection. Another use case can be in smart hospitals to detect medical issues using respiratory sensing without the use of camera devices [105].
- (c)
- Augmented sensing: ISAC can also be used in augmented sensing, which uses devices to sense the environment, which otherwise would not have been possible using human capabilities. This is because ISAC offers high-resolution imaging capabilities along with communication capabilities that can be used in intelligent smart city infrastructure. It can be used in monitoring air quality and pollution, the detection of fine particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), gas sensing, explosive detection, security scans of baggage, etc.
- (d)
- Imaging, mapping, and surrounding reconstruction
2.2.2. Challenges
- (a)
- Waveform design: Developing a new waveform design that can meet the requirement of both communication and sensing functions [106].
- (b)
- Performance tradeoff: Another significant challenge for ISAC is the beamforming due to conflicting requirements of communication and sensing systems. Whereas the communication systems prefer a narrowband beam, the sensing systems conversely favor a wideband arrangement so as to capture wide environmental information [107].
- (c)
- Clock synchronization requirements: For sensing functionality, the synchronization requirements are significantly more stringent than for communications. This is due to the resultant timing offset that may cause interference with the sensing functionality. In order to prevent phase-offset, ISAC systems need accurate clock synchronization between the receiver and transmitter [108].
- (d)
- Channel modeling and evaluation methodology: The channel model in 6G brings significant challenges, as it needs to consider both communication and sensing services. For example, the echo channel, which is one typical sensing channel, contains backscattering RCS characteristics generated from the surrounding objects. Such propagation channel types create new requirements that are currently not supported in prevailing communication channel models. Consequently, the prevailing channel modeling methodologies may need some rework and innovation.
2.3. IoT for Smart Cities with 6G
2.3.1. Characteristics of 6G-IoT
- (a)
- Extremely massive numbers: The number of IoT devices are expected to show massive growth in the future. Some of the reasons are as follows: Firstly, several new device types are expected to emerge, such as extended reality smart devices, to deliver very high performance. Secondly, large number of sensors will be required in applications related to autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, e-health, transportation, etc. Thirdly, the advent of novel applications such as holographic communications will require high-end devices.
- (b)
- More sensitive and intensive: With the introduction of new applications such as immersive communication, virtual reality, augmented reality, etc., the futuristic 6G-enabled IoT will be data-exhaustive, compute-heavy, and security/privacy vulnerable.
- (c)
- Sensing and localization dependent: With applications like autonomous vehicles and holographic communication, there is a requirement to utilize sensing and localization functionality to map surrounding objects precisely. So, in addition to earlier communication, computing and caching functions, IoT will be expected to handle sensing and localization tasks as well [112].
- (d)
- Real-time communication: For applications such as in remote surgery, autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, etc., IoT will need to transmit data in real time with ultra-low latency.
- (e)
- Energy efficient: With the deployment of large-scale IoT, energy efficiency will be a dominant design metric for IoT-based 6G networks. In addition, focus will also be on employing energy harvesting techniques in the IoT setting.
2.3.2. Classification of IoT
- (a)
- Internet of Robotic Things (IoRT): With immense progress in robotics technology and IoT, the combined use of both can considerably enhance automation and reduce cost. When integrated with robots, IoT devices augment robot functionality by fetching real-time sensing and monitoring data. Further, this sensed dataset can also be intelligently analyzed so that IoRT can attain efficient performance. IoRT can be utilized in applications related to warehousing, industrial automation, smart homes, etc.
- (b)
- Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): IoMT allows monitoring of patients remotely by using telehealth for screening and treatment and self-evaluation of health using smart wearables.
- (c)
- Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT): IIoT is utilized specifically for managing machine type communications for industrial systems. With the upcoming 6G technology, new emerging applications such as digital twins will demand 6G-enabled IIoT to provide super-high data rates. Similarly, industrial multi-robots using the 6G-IIoT system will require precise navigation, which makes localization and sensing a crucial KPI [114].
- (d)
- Internet of Everything (IoE): IoE has broadened the concept of IoT and includes networked environments of objects, files, humans and processes, as shown in Figure 8 [115]. It is projected by many that in the future, 99.4% of objects will be covered by the IoE concept [94]. IoE sensors can capture many parameters, such as temperature, pressure, bio-signals, velocity, etc., that are collected from massive numbers of intelligent devices used in industrial applications, health care, smart cities, etc. [116]. The sharp growth in the number of intelligent heterogeneous IoE devices, with each requiring massive data with low latency, creates a major hurdle for 5G networks. Despite these requirements, 6G networks can enable a smooth transition from IoT to IoE [117].
- (e)
- Internet of Space Things (IoST): IoST is considered to be an extension of IoT. Since there are limitations to the extent of area under terrestrial coverage, communication with remote areas that cannot otherwise be covered due to economic reasons can be made possible through the use of satellite-based communication harnessing the high speed, low latency and high bandwidth of 6G mobile technology [118].
- (f)
- Internet of Nano Things (IoNT): IoNT is the next-generation IoT, comprising minute nano-sized IoT devices with sizes varying from 0.1 to 100 nm [119]. Depending on the use case, these devices can be of various types, for example, nanomachines, nanorobots, nano-sensors, etc., which can transfer data amongst themselves or with external systems. These devices will find possible applications in healthcare, industrial processes, the monitoring of toxic gases, agriculture, etc. For specific healthcare applications, the Internet of Bio-Nano-Things (IoBNT) will use nano-sensors inside the human body to collect data for medical applications.
2.4. Blockchain (BC) and 6G-Enabled Smart Cities
Challenges
- (a)
- Blockchain substantially increases requirements for computational and storage capacity. This becomes a pressing issue in a smart city environment that has large number of devices generating voluminous data. With Blockchain integration, there is an increase in system complexity and also a substantial increase in the signaling overhead.
- (b)
- Energy consumption by IoT devices will increase due to increased computation. Developing energy-efficient algorithms, leveraging technologies like edge computing, and optimization of resource utilization can help mitigate this challenge.
- (c)
- Industry-wide protocols and standards will be required for seamless interoperability between Blockchain and a diverse range of 6G-enabled smart city IoT devices and sensors.
2.5. Terahertz (THz) Communication
2.5.1. Applications/Use Cases
- (a)
- V2X communications: The road safety applications in smart cities have stringent requirements for the ultrafast, low-latency, and ultra-reliable exchange of data. These stringent requirements can be potentially fulfilled by implementing the THz band in 6G V2X communications. Highly directed THz links may be utilized for data exchange among vehicles in fleets of autonomous vehicles executing cooperative driving.
- (b)
- Nano-networks in the medical domain: Due to the very small wavelengths, antennas with tiny dimensions can be designed, paving way for novel applications, for example, in nanoscale communications for nanomachines, the Internet of Nano-Things (IoNT), and on-chip communications [145]. For in vivo body-centric monitoring, THz waves can support nano-communication [146] and also enable unique advantages for imaging use cases.
- (c)
- Short-range communications: The THz band can be used for close-proximity communications involving LoS and a short distance (<1 m), which include applications like kiosk downloads for scenarios like high-data rate file exchange between kiosks and user devices found in places such as train stations, airports, shopping malls, etc.
- (d)
- High-speed train (HST) communication: High-speed broadband communication access for HST users is anticipated to be implemented by the next generation of mobile communications. 6G along with THz are envisioned to support “smart rail mobility” that demands seamless wireless connectivity along with ultra-high data rates for five scenarios: train-to-infrastructure (T2I), train-to-train (T2T), inside station, intra-wagon, and infrastructure-to-infrastructure (I2I) [147].
- (e)
- WLAN: The THz band can be used in typical indoor communications scenarios such as conference rooms and office rooms. But for such indoor settings, there is a need to consider LoS, scattering, and link blockage. For these reasons, it will be mainly used to interconnect access points and enable user access with fixed locations.
- (f)
- THz in health care: THz radiation has several spectral features, such as the following: it is non-ionizing, non-invasive, offers spectral fingerprinting, good resolution of <1 mm, polar substance phase sensitivity, coherent detection, and penetration capabilities that make it a promising technology for spectroscopy, sensing, and imaging in healthcare applications [148,149].
- (g)
- Terahertz imaging: The use of THz in imaging has many technical benefits over visible light and microwaves. Due to its small wavelength and wide bandwidth, THz imaging provides high spatial resolution [150]. Additionally, THz exhibits better penetration performance as compared to visible light and infrared. In the smart city context, there can be several security screening applications at critical locations such as airports, banks, border crossings, etc., to perform imaging of parcels for any hidden objectional objects.
2.5.2. Challenges
- (a)
- High propagation loss, atmospheric attenuation and blockage and absorption [151].
- (b)
- The cell size of THz communication will be small, so network architecture with higher cell density will be required.
- (c)
- Further research on accurate channel modeling and its characteristics for propagation scenarios containing ground, space, and nano-scale communication [151].
- (d)
- Hardware challenges due to high frequency in the development of THz antennas, amplifiers, and mixers, including the challenge of high bandwidth design of super heterodyne transceivers [152].
2.6. Quantum Communication (QC)
2.6.1. Applications
- (a)
- Quantum algorithms in 6G
- (b)
- Quantum computing and machine learning in 6G
- (c)
- Quantum sensing in 6G
- (d)
- Quantum Blockchain in 6G
2.6.2. Challenges
- (a)
- The first main challenge is its implementation in building quantum internet with network entities, such as, quantum routers, switches and repeaters, which, due to no-cloning theorem, is difficult [169].
- (b)
- (c)
- A major milestone to conceive quantum internet and quantum communication will be the establishment of quantum channels over long distances, which can be established by the physical platform of photons. But due to the loss of photons, which is a known research problem, quantum repeaters will be utilized to address this drawback.
2.7. Immersive Communication (IC)
2.7.1. Types of Immersive Communication
- (a)
- Extended reality (XR): XR includes technologies like virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR). Through the use of XR devices, users in the physical world can interact with their virtual avatar. Depending on the scale of virtuality, XR can be categorized as AR and VR. AR, with a lower scale of virtuality, deals in creating objects in the virtual world that are similar to those available in the physical world. VR uses a higher level of virtuality by creating entire virtual scenery. The XR implementation process can be broadly outlined in three steps: (a) content transmission, (b) rendering, and (c) feedback collection. In content transmission, VR content generated from content servers of VR content providers is transmitted. Transmitting ultra-high 12 K resolution videos from content servers demands ultra-high data rates. In the second step of content rendering, transmitted VR videos are stitched together for VR devices and projected as a 3D stereoscopic video. After playing the video, cameras or sensors available at the user end capture the users’ actions and motions. For accurate and smooth content delivery based on feedback on user motions, there are stringent latency and high data-rate requirements in XR. Also, high computing capabilities are required of both user devices and network servers for the smooth operation of interactive XR applications.
- (b)
- Haptic communication: Haptics refer to interactions of the form dealing with the sense of touch. In the first step, haptic sensors acquire haptic information that includes tactile and kinesthetic information. In the second step, the volume of haptic data is reduced without degrading the user’s immersive experience. In the third step, haptic data are transmitted over the communication network, creating a haptic data-stream. In the final step, when the haptic data are received by the haptic interface (HI) receiver, realistic haptic sensations are created by haptic actuators [172].
- (c)
- Holographic communication (HC): HC is a further evolution of immersive 3D images and video that demands extremely high data rates with ultra-low latency to transmit a life-size interactive hologram. With the considerable progress in holographic display technology in the last few years, for example, Microsoft’s HoloLens [173], this application will become a reality in the coming years. The massive data rates required, even after performing data compression, may range from a few tens of Mbps to 4.3 Tbps [174]. Similarly, the latency requirement for a seamless 3D holographic experience is less than sub-milliseconds. In order to create a reconstruction of a near-real hologram, HC requires the use of multiple cameras and sensors [175] to capture the image. The captured images are compressed and transmitted on a communication channel. On the received end, the images are decompressed and then projected using laser beams. In 6G, motion and audio data along with images will also be transmitted. Along with high data rates, high computational power is also required for such applications. In the future, holographic communication will thus provide real-time, in-person communicating experiences, enabling virtual meetings, virtual concerts, and more-interactive remote education.
2.7.2. Use Cases for Immersive Communication
2.8. Visible Light Communication (VLC)
2.8.1. Free-Space Optics (FSO)
2.8.2. Fiber-Wireless System (FiWi)
2.8.3. Power over Fiber (PoF)
2.8.4. Challenges
- (a)
- Further work is required for VLC Integration with currently operating communication protocols like Wi-Fi, etc.
- (b)
- The bandwidth of presently used LED is low, less sensitive as receiver, and also has non-linear performance. Laser diodes require strict transmitter–receiver alignment. VLC systems for 6G networks will require new, enhanced optical hardware that can support wide bandwidth and high sensitivity and that, at the same time, is inexpensive.
- (c)
- To reduce the impact of noise introduced by ambient light, new channel coding schemes needs to be looked into for more effective reduction of noise than possible with currently used techniques.
- (d)
- For VLC system design, there is a need for a recognized and realistic channel model considering mobility, indoor/outdoor, dimming control, LOS/NLOS scenarios, etc.
2.9. Mobile Edge Computing (MEC)
Applications
- (a)
- Video-based applications such as smart traffic monitoring, environmental monitoring or smoke detection capture voluminous video data. In such scenarios, video analytics performed at the edge locations can have a crucial role in distributing the computational load. In surveillance video applications, instead of transferring the massive data, computations can be performed at edge, and only the actionable data can be transmitted for a quicker response.
- (b)
- MEC in an intelligent transport system (ITS) has the capability to ensure that the transportation system is safe, sustainable and efficient. An IoT-based ITS is a combination of data-exhaustive, complex, uncertain and dynamic operations like resource allocation, task management, and security, for which edge computing can be effectively used. In any typical traffic scenario, there can be a wide range of different end devices in vehicles requiring high bandwidth and low latency. The computational device with required power can be placed closer to the end-user, for example, at a roadside unit (RSU) or a base station at the edge, as shown in Figure 11 This affords a significant decrease in end-to-end latency as compared to the centralized cloud [198]. ITS can be broadly classified into three service areas: (1) safety services to minimize accidents, (2) non-safety services to minimize congestion, and (3) infotainment services such as content sharing [199].
- (c)
- MECs use integrated aerial and terrestrial networks that are essential parts of 6G networks [200]. Unmanned aerial vehicles and drones constitute the aerial network and are widely used in surveillance, search-and-rescue and wildlife conservation applications. These applications are based on video analytics that are real-time. MEC is used in such video applications, which helps in computational offloading and latency reduction, but certain issues still need to be addressed, including (1) offloading computational tasks to another MEC when a drone flies away from the coverage area, and (2) limited drone battery power that restricts computational capacity.
2.10. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs)
Challenges
2.11. Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs)
2.11.1. Airborne Base Stations (ABS), UAVs, and Drones Uses in a 6G Smart City
Applications/Benefits
- (a)
- Airborne base stations will provide line-of-sight (LoS), high-quality air-to-ground 6G coverage. They also extend the coverage footprint of terrestrial base stations.
- (b)
- Airborne base stations can be used to provide additional high capacity at dense urban hotspots that otherwise would not have been possible with a terrestrial base station.
- (c)
- (d)
- In remote or rural areas that are lacking in telecom infrastructure, UAV-BS can be used as a low-cost solution to provide connectivity.
Challenges
- (a)
- Optimal placement and movement of UAV-BSs in the sky is required so as to have efficient network performance in dynamically changing network topology. Conventional heuristic and numerical methods may not be well suited for such dynamic environments [68]. AI-based methods [19] such as reinforced learning and deep reinforced learning (DRL) can be utilized in such dynamically changing environments.
- (b)
- Frequent radio link failure and ping-pong handover events triggered by fragmented reference signal receive power (RSRP) are another major problem [215]. In order to provide seamless UAV connectivity, optimal handover rules based on reinforced learning are a potential solution. The RL-based solution shown in Figure 15 uses a base station as agent and uses a combination of cost of handover and RSRP as reward. Based upon the agent’s reward from its action in the current state, it moves to a new state after interacting with the environment.
- (c)
- Limited energy availability in drones curtails their hovering time, which is a big hindrance in their adoption. However, a few techniques, such as the grasping capability [216] of drones, can improve their flying/hovering time.
2.11.2. Satellite Communication
3. Applications of 6G in Smart Cities
3.1. Industrial Automation and Smart Manufacturing
3.2. Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Technology in Smart Cities
Use Cases of V2X
- (a)
- Smart routing—Vehicular traffic congestion in urban settings causes delays and increases fuel consumption and pollution. Smart routing can be used to guide drivers to follow the most efficient routes, which are less congested. This is achieved through the use of AI-based routing algorithms [239] that are based on real-time data collected from IoT sensors, vehicle ad-hoc networks and pedestrian activity. This is particularly useful for emergency vehicles like ambulances, fire brigades, etc. Also, through its use, the traffic is evenly distributed across all possible routes. Additionally, it affords better fuel efficiency and reduced emissions [240].
- (b)
- Smart parking—In any urban environment, parking problems have increased with the increase in vehicle density and limited parking spaces. So, the key to solve this issue is to optimally utilize the available spaces. A smart solution to the problem can be to use sensors to capture the occupancy status of a parking lot, and an application can be used to display that status. This will not only optimally utilize the parking spaces but will also reduce the time and fuel consumed by vehicle drivers in searching for parking spaces.
- (c)
- Speed harmonization—By shaping the speed of vehicles as per determined recommendations, smooth and safe traffic flow can be achieved. By doing so, frequent acceleration and deceleration is avoided, which yields better fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. Another approach is using green light coordination, in which multiple green lights work in a coordinated manner so that a smooth traffic flow is ensured. AI with cloudification is a technology enabler to implement this use case. For faster communication, localized V2X should be implemented between vehicles whose speed harmonization is required.
- (d)
- Green driving—In order to reduce the environmental impact of vehicles in critical areas such as near hospitals, schools, etc., a green driving strategy to reduce emissions is used. One way to achieve this is to devise a traffic management strategy to reduce the number of vehicles in the area during high pollution periods. Another way is to reduce the speed of vehicles and hence their fuel consumption and emissions. Table 10 provides summary of use cases of V2X.
3.3. Smart Healthcare
Challenges
- (a)
- Major challenges in the healthcare system include security and privacy. Failing to satisfy these challenges may lead to erroneous treatment decisions and catastrophic results.
- (b)
- Further study and research are required in molecular communication in eHealth systems, leading to the practical applicability of IoBNT. Further insight into biological channel environments and system architectures is required for efficient coding, modulation and detection [249].
3.4. Smart Grid
Challenges
- (a)
- Cybersecurity: It is crucial to safeguard the integrity of smart systems and their data, as any laxity can lead to catastrophic results. Massively connected cyber physical systems (CPS) like a smart grid, which works on 6G networks and uses software-defined IoTs, can be vulnerable to cyber-attacks [260]. Technologies that can be leveraged to significantly reduce the risk are Blockchain [261], network slicing, edge computing, DSA, and cyber twins.
- (b)
- Interoperability and standards: In a smart grid, a massive number and wide range of smart sensors and devices are interconnected and should seamlessly communicate with one another. Open architectures facilitate interoperability between devices and systems. Further, AI and SDN can help to meet the interoperability challenges.
3.5. Smart Waste Management
4. Conclusions, Open Challenges and Possible Future Research
- ▪
- Further work is required in developing energy-efficient and green technology solutions that can not only be environmentally beneficial but also reduce capital and operational power expenditures. Since 6G devices will operate in a higher frequency band, they are expected to demand higher energy requirements [274]. Techniques like energy-aware task offloading, efficient resource management, energy-aware architecture, the use of RIS [275], energy harvesting, and energy cooperation [276] need to be implemented to enable energy efficiency. Also, the convergence of 6G and AI will potentially address the shortcomings of network topology and find an optimized path toward a sustainable ecosystem [277,278].
- ▪
- Robust measures are required to address security and privacy concerns, which are heightened due to hyper-connected devices beyond 5G-advanced networks. Advanced threat-detection mechanisms and quantum-safe cryptography need to be in place and may become central themes in protecting the integrity of 6G smart city networks.
- ▪
- ▪
- With the use of NTN, fast moving UAVs and satellites will be major challenges because their relocation has an impact on network topology and handover. This will make mobility scenarios for 6G much more complex since both ground users and aerial base stations are mobile.
- ▪
- The TCP/IP protocol is often implemented in computer networks, but its use in satellite-based networks will be inefficient due to long delays and higher BER. So, in order to have smooth interoperability between terrestrial and non-terrestrial networks, a new or improved protocol might be needed. Several improved protocols are used in satellite communication, such as TCP Reno (1990), TCP Vegas (1994), TCP Westwood (2001), MPTCP (2011), Cross-layer, Novel-ECM, etc. During the 6G evolution process, several versions of the TCP enhancement technologies may coexist during the evaluation stage to meet the mega-constellation’s link criteria [279].
- ▪
- There is a need for the development of a smart city digital technology platform that can converge technical solutions that currently prevail across multiple cities. This will help in promoting data interoperability and technology neutrality [280]. The platform should have the capability to bring comprehensive convergence and generativity spread across the smart city innovation ecosystem [281,282]. A recent survey paper [283] on middleware smart city solutions performed an assessment of the functional and non-functional requirements of 20 different middleware solutions, like AMF-CPS [284], CityPulse [285], FIWARE [286], S2NetM [287], etc. But there are still open challenges in using smart city middleware, such as interoperability, security issues amidst big data, scalability, context management, energy efficiency, reliability, and QOS. Strong collaborations between various smart city stakeholders, such as computer scientists, social scientists, urban planners, and other specialists, can lead to greater understanding and solutions.
- ▪
- A 6G-enabled smart city should address the issue of the digital divide, which means that its network services should be available and accessible to all citizens. Although 6G is aligned to address this issue through the combined use of several technologies, such NTN, RIS, AI, Cloud, VLC, etc., there may be challenges in generating cost-viable integrated solutions so that smart city applications are affordable for all citizens.
- ▪
- During the transition to new 6G technology, the existing devices/sensors in smart cities will need to be replaced with 6G-enabled smart devices. This will involve massive economic costs, among other challenges. There is a need to harmoniously combine multiple technologies to mitigate these costs.
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xin, B.; Qu, Y. Effects of smart city policies on green total factor productivity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antwi-Afari, P.; Owusu-Manu, D.G.; Simons, B.; Debrah, C. Ato Ghansah Sustainability guidelines to attaining smart sustainable cities in developing countries: A ghanaian context Sustain. Futures 2021, 3, 100044. [Google Scholar]
- UN [United Nations]. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; UN [United Nations]: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Cartalis, C. Toward resilient cities—A review of definitions, challenges and prospects. Adv. Build. Energy Res. 2014, 8, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voytenko, Y.; Mccormick, K.; Evans, J.; Schliwa, G. Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 123, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifi, A. A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber-Lewerenz, B.; Traverso, M. Navigating Applied Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Digital Era: How Smart Buildings and Smart Cities Become the Key to Sustainability. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. (AIA) 2023, 1, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blasi, S.; Ganzaroli, A.; De Noni, I. Smartening Sustainable Development in Cities: Strengthening the Theoretical Linkage between Smart Cities and SDGs. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 80, 103793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smart Cities Market—Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, Regional Outlook, and Forecast 2023–2033. Available online: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/smart-cities-market (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Ishteyaq, I.; Muzaffar, K.; Shafi, N.; Alathbah, M.A. Unleashing the Power of Tomorrow: Exploration of Next Frontier with 6G Networks and Cutting Edge Technologies. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 29445–29463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, F.; Khandaker, M.R.; Wong, K.-K.; Imran, M.A.; Bennis, M.; Debbah, M. A speculative study on 6G. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IMT Traffic Estimates for the Years 2020 to 2030, Document ITU 0-2370. 2015. Available online: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2370-2015-PDF-E.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- ITU. IMT towards 2030 and Beyond. 2023. Available online: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-R/study-groups/rsg5/rwp5d/imt-2030/Pages/default.aspx (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Dang, S.; Amin, O.; Shihada, B.; Alouini, M.-S. What should 6G be? Nat. Electron. 2020, 3, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, Z.; Xiao, M.; Ding, Z.; Lei, X.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Fan, P. 6G wireless networks: Vision, requirements, architecture, and key technologies. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2019, 14, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kugley, S.; Wade, A.; Thomas, J.; Mahood, Q.; Anne-Marie Klint, J.; Hammerstrøm, K.; Sathe, N. Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews. Campbell Syst. Rev. 2017, 13, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fong, B.; Kim, H.; Fong, A.C.M.; Hong, G.Y.; Tsang, K.F. Reliability Optimization in the Design and Implementation of 6G Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Systems for Emergency Management in a Smart City Environment. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 61, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, P.; Singh, G. 6G-IoT Framework for Sustainable Smart City: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2024, 13, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parvaresh, N.; Kantarci, B. A Continuous Actor–Critic Deep Q-Learning-Enabled Deployment of UAV Base Stations: Toward 6G Small Cells in the Skies of Smart Cities. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2023, 4, 700–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Hu, D.; Guo, Q.; Zuo, L.; Ji, W. Visual E2C: AI-Driven Visual End-Edge-Cloud Architecture for 6G in Low-Carbon Smart Cities. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2023, 30, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sehito, N.; Shouyi, Y.; Alshahrani, H.M.; Alamgeer, M.; Dutta, A.K.; Alsubai, S.; Nkenyereye, L.; Dhanaraj, R.K. Optimizing User Association, Power Control and Beamforming for 6G Multi-IRS Multi-UAV NOMA Communications in Smart Cities. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.R.; Singh, V.K.; Yadav, R.; Chaurasia, S.N. 6G networks for artificial intelligence-enabled smart cities applications: A scoping review. Telemat. Inform. Rep. 2023, 9, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murroni, M.; Anedda, M.; Fadda, M.; Ruiu, P.; Popescu, V.; Zaharia, C.; Giusto, D. 6G—Enabling the New Smart City: A Survey. Sensors 2023, 23, 7528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamruzzaman, M.M. Key Technologies, Applications and Trends of Internet of Things for Energy-Efficient 6G Wireless Communication in Smart Cities. Energies 2022, 15, 5608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.; Kim, G.; Shim, S.; Jang, S.; Song, J.; Lee, B. Key Technologies for 6G-Enabled Smart Sustainable City. Electronics 2024, 13, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismail, L.; Buyya, R. Artificial Intelligence Applications and Self-Learning 6G Networks for Smart Cities Digital Ecosystems: Taxonomy, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sensors 2022, 22, 5750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qadir, Z.; Le, K.N.; Saeed, N.; Munawar, H.S. Towards 6G Internet of Things: Recent advances, use cases, and open challenges. ICT Express 2023, 9, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shafi, M.; Jha, R.K.; Jain, S. 6G: Technology Evolution in Future Wireless Networks. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 57548–57573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lombardi, P.; Giordano, S.; Farouh, H.; Yousef, W. Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation 2012, 25, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talebkhah, M.; Sali, A.; Marjani, M.; Gordan, M.; Hashim, S.J.; Rokhani, F.Z. IoT and Big Data Applications in Smart Cities: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Critical Issues. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 55465–55484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, T.; Solanki, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Nayyar, A.; Paul, A. A Decade Review on Smart Cities: Paradigms, Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 68319–68364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, M.S.; Nadir, R.M.; Rustam, F.; Hur, S.; Park, Y.; Ashraf, I. Nested Bee Hive: A Conceptual Multilayer Architecture for 6G in Futuristic Sustainable Smart Cities. Sensors 2022, 22, 5950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhu, Y.; Mao, B.; Kato, N. Intelligent Reflecting Surface in 6G Vehicular Communications: A Survey. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2022, 3, 266–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hijji, M.; Iqbal, R.; Pandey, A.K.; Doctor, F.; Karyotis, C.; Rajeh, W.; Alshehri, A.; Aradah, F. 6G Connected Vehicle Framework to Support Intelligent Road Maintenance Using Deep Learning Data Fusion. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 7726–7735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamruzzaman, M.; Hossin, A.; Alruwaili, O.; Alanazi, S.; Alruwaili, M.; Alshammari, N.; Alaerjan, A.; Zaman, R. IoT-Oriented 6G Wireless Network System for Smart Cities. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bekkali, A.E.; Essaaidi, M.; Boulmalf, M. A Blockchain-Based Architecture and Framework for Cybersecure Smart Cities. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 76359–76370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samanta, S.; Sarkar, A.; Bulo, Y. Secure 6G Communication in Smart City Using Blockchain. In Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security, Singapore, 4–10 May 2023; Dutta, P., Chakrabarti, S., Bhattacharya, A., Dutta, S., Piuri, V., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 487–496. [Google Scholar]
- Tekale, S.; Rajagopal, R.; Bhoopathy, V. 6G: Transformation of Smart Cities with Blockchain and AI. In Challenges and Risks Involved in Deploying 6G and NextGen Networks; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 220–228. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, M.; Agarwal, U.; Rishiwal, V.; Tanwar, S.; Kumar, S.; Alqahtani, F.; Tolba, A. Exploring Synergy of Blockchain and 6G Network for Industrial Automation. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 137163–137187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, N.J. Quantum cryptography in Convolution neural network approach in Smart cities. J. Surv. Fish. Sci. 2023, 10, 2043–2056. [Google Scholar]
- Muheidat, F.; Dajani, K.; Tawalbeh, L.A. Security Concerns for 5G/6G Mobile Network Technology and Quantum Communication. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 203, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, M.Z.; Abohmra, A.; Usman, M.; Zahid, A.; Heidari, H.; Imran, M.A.; Abbasi, Q.H. Quantum for 6G communication: A perspective. IET Quantum Commun. 2023, 10, 12391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manzalini, A. Quantum communications in future networks and services. Quantum Rep. 2020, 2, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahid, A.; Alsharif, M.H.; Hall, T.J. The convergence of Blockchain, IoT and 6G: Potential, opportunities, challenges and research roadmap. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2023, 217, 103677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pajooh, H.H.; Demidenko, S.; Aslam, S.; Harris, M. Blockchain and 6G-Enabled IoT. Inventions 2022, 7, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, A.; De, D.; Dey, N.; Crespo, R.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E. DisastDrone: A Disaster Aware Consumer Internet of Drone Things System in Ultra-Low Latent 6G Network. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 2023, 69, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucic, M.C.; Bouhamed, O.; Ghazzai, H.; Khanfor, A.; Massoud, Y. Leveraging UAVs to Enable Dynamic and Smart Aerial Infrastructure for ITS and Smart Cities: An Overview. Drones 2023, 7, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, X.; Yang, H.; Huang, W. Low-delay Routing Scheme for UAV Communications in Smart Cities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2023, 32, 67131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saini, H.K.; Jain, K.L. A New Way of Improving Network by Smart IoE with UAV. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Technology and Networking (CICTN), Berlin, Germany, 4–8 May 2023; pp. 485–489. [Google Scholar]
- Alawadhi, A.; Almogahed, A.; Azrag, E. Towards Edge Computing for 6G Internet of Everything: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2023 1st International Conference on Advanced Innovations in Smart Cities (ICAISC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, 23–25 January 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Konhäuser, W. Digitalization in Buildings and Smart Cities on the Way to 6G. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 121, 1289–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.; Lv, H.; Lv, Z. Sensing fusion in vehicular network digital twins for 6G smart city. ITU J. Future Evol. Technol. 2022, 3, 342–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.; Jiang, C.; Wang, J.; Ren, Y.; Debbah, M. Machine learning for 6G wireless networks: Carrying forward enhanced bandwidth, massive access, and ultrareliable/low-latency service. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2020, 15, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikalef, P.; Lemmer, K.; Schaefer, C.; Ylinen, M.; Fjørtoft, S.O.; Torvatn, H.Y.; Gupta, M.; Niehaves, B. Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies: A study of determinants for European municipalities. Gov. Inf. Q. 2022, 39, 101596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Desouza, K.; Butler, L.; Roozkhosh, F. Contributions and risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in building smarter cities: Insights from a systematic review of the literature. Energies 2020, 13, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.; Rowland, Z.; Machova, V. Internet of Things smart devices sustainable industrial big data and artificial intelligence-based decision-making algorithms in cyber-physical system-based manufacturing. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 106–116. [Google Scholar]
- Bandaragoda, T.; Adikari, A.; Nawaratne, R.; Nallaperuma, D.; Luhach, A.K.; Kempitiya, T.; Nguyen, S.; Alahakoon, D.; De Silva, D.; Chilamkurti, N. Artificial intelligence based commuter behaviour profiling framework using Internet of Things for real-time decision-making. Neural Comput. Appl. 2020, 32, 16057–16071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Zhu, D. Towards artificial intelligence enabled 6G: State of the art, challenges, and opportunities. Comput. Netw. 2020, 183, 107556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.; Gao, Z. Data-driven deep learning to design pilot and channel estimator for massive MIMO. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2020, 69, 5677–5682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.X.; di Renzo, M.; Stańczak, S.; Wang, S.; Larsson, E.G. Artificial intelligence enabled wireless networking for 5G and beyond: Recent advances and future challenges. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tataria, H.; Shafi, M.; Molisch, A.F.; Dohler, M.; Sjoland, H.; Tufvesson, F. 6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities. Proc. IEEE 2021, 109, 1166–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rekkas, V.P.; Sotiroudis, S.; Sarigiannidis, P.; Wan, S.; Karagiannidis, G.K.; Goudos, S.K. Machine learning in beyond 5g/6g networks—State-of-the-art and future trends. Electronics 2021, 10, 2786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, N.; Mao, B.; Tang, F.; Kawamoto, Y.; Liu, J. Ten challenges in advancing machine learning technologies toward 6G. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2020, 27, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, N.A.; Schmid, S. AI-RAN in 6G Networks: State-of-the-Art and Challenges. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2023, 5, 294–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Letaief, K.B.; Chen, W.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.-J.A. The roadmap to 6G: AI empowered wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2019, 57, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narottama, B.; Mohamed, Z.; Aïssa, S. Quantum Machine Learning for Next-G Wireless Communications: Fundamentals and the Path Ahead. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2023, 4, 2204–2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shvetsov, A.V.; Alsamhi, S.H.; Hawbani, A.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, S.; Agarwal, S.; Rajput, N.S.; Alammari, A.A.; Nashwan, F.M.A. Federated Learning Meets Intelligence Reflection Surface in Drones for Enabling 6G Networks: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 130860–130887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klaine, P.V.; Nadas, J.P.B.; Souza, R.D.; Imran, M.A. Distributed drone base station positioning for emergency cellular networks using reinforcement learning. Cogn. Comput. 2018, 10, 790–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.M.; Zhong, C.; Li, G.Y.; Zhang, Z. An attention-aided deep learning framework for massive MIMO channel estimation. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 21, 1823–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Shea, T.; Hoydis, J. An Introduction to Deep Learning for the Physical Layer. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 2017, 3, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Yang, Z.; Ng, D.W.K.; Levorato, M.; Eldar, Y.C.; Debbah, M. Edge learning for B5G networks with distributed signal processing: Semantic communication, edge computing, and wireless sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2023, 17, 9–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schiller, J.H.; Wesley, A. Mobile Communications, 2nd ed.; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Kairouz, P.; McMahan, H.B.; Avent, B.; Bellet, A.; Bennis, M.; Bhagoji, A.N.; Bonawitz, K.; Charles, Z.; Cormode, G.; Cummings, R.; et al. Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2021, 14, 1–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Xie, Y.; Bai, H.; Yu, B.; Li, W.; Gao, Y. A survey on federated learning. Knowl. -Based Syst. 2021, 216, 106775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; He, Z.; Peng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, J. Deep learning aided method for automatic modulation recognition. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 109063–109068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinayakumar, R.; Soman, K.; Poornachandran, P. Applying deep learning approaches for network traffic prediction. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Manipal, India, 13–16 September 2017; pp. 2353–2358. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Long, K.; Karagiannidis, G.K. Deep learning based radio resource management in NOMA networks: User association, subchannel and power allocation. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 2020, 7, 2406–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Karimzadeh, M.; Pacheco, L.; Santos, H.; Rosário, D.; Braun, T.; Cerqueira, E. Mobility management with transferable reinforcement learning trajectory prediction. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2020, 17, 2102–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozpoyraz, B.; Dogukan, A.T.; Gevez, Y.; Altun, U.; Basar, E. Deep Learning-Aided 6G Wireless Networks: A Comprehensive Survey of Revolutionary PHY Architectures. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 1749–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuel, N.; Diskin, T.; Ami, W. Deep MIMO detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Sapporo, Japan, 3–6 July 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Samuel, N.; Diskin, T.; Wiesel, A. Learning to detect. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2019, 67, 2554–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Wen, C.-K.; Jin, S.; Li, G.Y. A model-driven deep learning network for MIMO detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP), Anaheim, CA, USA, 26–28 November 2018; pp. 584–588. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Baidhani, A.; Fan, H.H. Learning for detection: A deep learning wireless communication receiver over rayleigh fading channels. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC), Honolulu, HI, USA, 18–21 February 2019; pp. 6–10. [Google Scholar]
- Shamasundar, B.; Chockalingam, A. A DNN architecture for the detection of generalized spatial modulation Signalsieee. Commun. Lett. 2020, 24, 2770–2774. [Google Scholar]
- Albinsaid, H.; Singh, K.; Biswas, S.; Li, C.-P.; Alouini, M.-S. Block deep neural network-based signal detector for generalized spatial modulation. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2020, 24, 2775–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, L.; Liu, Y.; Van Luong, T.; Maunder, R.G.; Yang, L.-L.; Hanzo, L. Deep-learning-aided joint channel estimation and data detection for spatial modulation. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 191910–191919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Wen, C.-K.; Jin, S.; Li, G.Y. Model-driven deep learning for MIMO detection. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2020, 68, 1702–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Hua, H.; Xu, Y. Pilot-assisted channel estimation and signal detection in uplink multi-user MIMO systems with deep learning. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 44936–44946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohrabi, F.; Cheng, H.V.; Yu, W. Robust symbol-level precoding via autoencoder-based deep learning. In Proceedings of the ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Virtual, 4–9 May 2020; pp. 8951–8955. [Google Scholar]
- Bo, Z.; Liu, R.; Li, M.; Liu, Q. Deep learning based efficient symbol-level precoding design for MU-MISO systems. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 8309–8313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheraz, M.; Ahmed, M.; Hou, X.; Li, Y.; Jin, D.; Han, Z.; Jiang, T. Artificial Intelligence for Wireless Caching: Schemes, Performance, and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 23, 631–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Zhang, K.; Wu, F.; Leng, S. Collaborative Machine Learning for Energy-Efficient Edge Networks in 6G. IEEE Netw. 2021, 35, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navarathna, P.J.; Malagi, V.P. Artificial intelligence in smart city analysis. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), Tirunelveli, India, 13–14 December 2018; pp. 44–47. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, V.; Kumar, S. Role of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance the security and privacy of data in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, India, 12–13 May 2023; pp. 596–599. [Google Scholar]
- Ilyas, M. IoT applications in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data (ICEIB), Yilan, Taiwan, 10–12 December 2021; pp. 44–47. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.; Cui, Y.; Masouros, C.; Xu, J.; Han, T.X.; Eldar, Y.C.; Buzzi, S. Integrated sensing and communications: Towards dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2022, 40, 1728–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Zheng, L.; Cui, Y.; Masouros, C.; Petropulu, A.P.; Griffiths, H.; Eldar, Y.C. Seventy Years of Radar and Communications: The road from separation to integration. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2023, 40, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Liu, F.; Jing, X.; Mu, J. Integrating sensing and communications for ubiquitous IoT: Applications, trends, and challenges. IEEE Netw. 2021, 35, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiriyath, A.R.; Paul, B.; Bliss, D.W. Radar-communications convergence: Coexistence cooperation and co-Des. Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 2017, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.A.; Liu, F.; Masouros, C.; Heath, R.W.; Feng, Z.; Zheng, L.; Petropulu, A. An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 2021, 15, 1295–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, K.V.; Shankar, M.B.; Koivunen, V.; Ottersten, B.; Vorobyov, S.A. Toward millimeter-wave joint radar communications: A signal processing perspective. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2019, 36, 100–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Althobaiti, T.; Khalil, R.A.; Saeed, N. Robust ISAC Localization in Smart Cities: A Hybrid Network Approach for NLOS Challenges with Uncertain Parameters. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2024, 13, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, R.A.; Saeed, N.; Almutiry, M. UAVs-assisted passive source localization using robust TDOA ranging for search and rescue. ICT Express 2022, 9, 677–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Wang, B.; Zhao, Y.; Luan, M. Near-field RSS-based localization algorithms using reconfigurable intelligent surface. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 3493–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Liu, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, C. Wireless sensing for human activity: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2020, 22, 1629–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, N.H.; Nguyen, D.N.; Hoang, D.T.; Pham, Q.-V.; Hwang, W.-J.; Dutkiewicz, E. Ai-empowered joint communication and radar systems with adaptive waveform for autonomous vehicles. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.11508. [Google Scholar]
- Demirhan, U.; Alkhateeb, A. Integrated sensing and communication for 6g: Ten key machine learning roles. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 61, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, S.; Liu, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, K.; Huang, H.; Zou, J.; Li, X.; Dong, Y.; Dong, F.; Zhu, J.; et al. Integrated Sensing and Communications: Recent Advances and Ten Open Challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 19094–19120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, N.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y.; Alouini, M.-S. Around the world of IoT/climate monitoring using internet of X-things. IEEE Internet Things Mag. 2020, 3, 82–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurgen, L.; Gunalp, O.; Benazzouz, Y.; Gallissot, M. Self-aware cyber-physical systems and applications in smart buildings and cities. In Proceedings of the 2013 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Grenoble, France, 18–22 March 2013; pp. 1149–1154. [Google Scholar]
- Kato, T.; Fukumoto, N.; Sasaki, C.; Tagami, A.; Nakao, A. Challenges of CPS/IoT Network Architecture in 6G Era. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 62804–62817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, F.; Yu, F.R.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Ji, H.; Leung, V.C.M. Enabling Massive IoT Toward 6G: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 11891–11915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmood, N.H.; Berardinelli, G.; Khatib, E.J.; Hashemi, R.; Morais de Lima, C.; Latva-aho, M. A Functional Architecture for 6G Special Purpose Industrial IoT Networks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 19, 2530–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eldrandaly, K.A.; Abdel-Basset, M.; Shawky, L.A. Internet of Spatial Things: A New Reference Model with Insight Analysis. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 19653–19669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Banafaa, M.; Shayea, I.; Din, J.; Azmi, M.H.; Alashbi, A.; Daradkeh, Y.I.; Alhammadi, A. 6G Mobile Communication Technology: Requirements, Targets, Applications, Challenges, Advantages, and Opportunities. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 64, 245–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.; Reebadiya, D.; Tanwar, S. 6G-enabled edge intelligence for ultra -reliable low latency applications: Vision and mission. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2021, 77, 103521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alwis, C.D.; Kalla, A.; Pham, Q.-V.; Kumar, P.; Dev, K.; Hwang, W.-J.; Liyanage, M. Survey on 6G frontiers: Trends, applications, requirements, technologies and future research. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2021, 2, 836–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kua, J.; Loke, S.W.; Arora, C.; Fernando, N.; Ranaweera, C. Internet of Things in Space: A Review of Opportunities and Challenges from Satellite-Aided Computing to Digitally-Enhanced Space Living. Sensors 2021, 21, 8117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alabdulatif, A.; Thilakarathne, N.N.; Lawal, Z.K.; Fahim, K.E.; Zakari, R.Y. Internet of Nano-Things (IoNT): A Comprehensive Review from Architecture to Security and Privacy Challenges. Sensors 2023, 23, 2807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ullah, Z.; Naeem, M.; Coronato, A.; Ribino, P.; De Pietro, G. Applications in Sustainable Smart Cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 97, 104697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.H.; Hassan, N.U.; Yuen, C.; Zhao, J.; Niyato, D.; Zhang, Y.; Poor, H.V. Blockchain and 6G: The Future of Secure and Ubiquitous Communication. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2021, 29, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Xiong, Z.; Niyato, D.; Ye, D.; Kim, D.I.; Zhao, J. Toward secure blockchain-enabled internet of vehicles: Optimizing consensus management using reputation and contract theory. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 2906–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Oh, I.; Yim, K.; Sahlabadi, M.; Shukur, Z. Security of 6G-Enabled Vehicle-to-Everything Communication in Emerging Federated Learning and Blockchain Technologies. IEEE Access 2023, 12, 33972–34001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, N.U.; Yuen, C.; Niyato, D. Blockchain technologies for smart energy systems: Fundamentals, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2019, 13, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leng, J.; Ye, S.; Zhou, M.; Zhao, J.L.; Liu, Q.; Guo, W.; Cao, W.; Fu, L. Blockchain-Secured Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2021, 51, 237–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balandina, E.; Balandin, S.; Mouromtsev, D. IoT use cases in healthcare and tourism. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 17th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), Lisbon, Portugal, 13–16 July 2015; pp. 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- Chaudjary, S.; Kakkar, R.; Gupta, R.; Tanwar, S.; Agrawal, S.; Sharma, R. Blockchain and federated learning-based security solutions for telesurgery system: A comprehensive review. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2022, 30, 2446–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhushan, B.; Khamparia, A.; Sagayam, K.M.; Sharma, S.K.; Ahad, M.A.; Debnath, N.C. Blockchain for smart cities: A review of architectures integration trends and future research directions. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Long, S.; Zhao, L.; Tang, Z. Exploring the Synergy of Blockchain, IoT, and Edge Computing in Smart Traffic Management across Urban Landscapes. J. Grid Comput. 2024, 22, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, A.Y.A.; Verma, N.; Sarhan, N.M.; Awwad, E.M.; Arora, A.; Nyangaresi, V.O. An IoT and Blockchain-Based Secure and Transparent Supply Chain Management Framework in Smart Cities Using Optimal Queue Model. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 51752–51771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.; Dou, H.; Chen, S.; Zhao, H. A novel block-chain based secure cross-domain interaction approach for intelligent transportation systems. Phys. Commun. 2024, 63, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raja, G.; Senthivel, S.G.; Balaganesh, S.; Rajakumar, B.R.; Ravichandran, V.; Guizani, M. MLB-IoD: Multi Layered Blockchain Assisted 6G Internet of Drones Ecosystem. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2023, 72, 2511–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, K.; Liu, Y.; Shu, C.; Sun, Y.; Wang, K. Fine-Grained Benchmarking and Targeted Optimization: Enabling Green IoT-Oriented Blockchain in the 6G Era. IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw. 2022, 7, 1036–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, K.; Chadotra, S.; Tanwar, S.; Gupta, R.; Kumar, N. Blockchain for IoV in 6G environment: Review solutions and challenges. Clust. Comput. 2022, 25, 1927–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, A.; Singh, G.; Kukreja, V.; Sharma, S.; Singh, S.; Yoon, B. Adaptation of IoT with Blockchain in Food Supply Chain Management: An Analysis-Based Review in Development, Benefits and Potential Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyildiz, I.F.; Kak, A.; Nie, S. 6G and beyond: The future of wireless communications systems. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 133995–134030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bariah, L.; Mohjazi, L.; Muhaidat, S.; Sofotasios, P.C.; Kurt, G.K.; Yanikomeroglu, H.; Dobre, O.A. A prospective look: Key enabling technologies applications and open research topics in 6G networks. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2004.06049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, W.; Zhou, Q.; He, J.; Habibi, M.A.; Melnyk, S.; El-Absi, M.; Han, B.; Di Renzo, M.; Schotten, H.D.; Luo, F.-L.; et al. Terahertz Communications and Sensing for 6G and Beyond: A Comprehensive View. TechRxiv 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elayan, H.; Amin, O.; Shihada, B.; Shubair, R.M.; Alouini, M.-S. Terahertz band: The last piece of RF spectrum puzzle for communication systems. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2019, 1, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saad, W.; Bennis, M.; Chen, M. A vision of 6G wireless systems: Applications trends technologies and open research problems. IEEE Netw. 2020, 34, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.; Li, G.Y. Terahertz communications: An array-of-subarrays solution. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2016, 54, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, C.; Ren, H.; Wang, K.; Kolb, J.F.; Elkashlan, M.; Chen, M.; Di Renzo, M.; Hao, Y.; Wang, J.; Swindlehurst, A.L.; et al. Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6G systems: Principles applications and research directions. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2011.04300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basharat, S.; Hassan, S.A.; Pervaiz, H.; Mahmood, A.; Ding, Z.; Gidlund, M. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: Potentials, Applications, and Challenges for 6G Wireless Networks. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2021, 28, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rappaport, T.S.; Xing, Y.; Kanhere, O.; Ju, S.; Madanayake, A.; Mandal, S.; Trichopoulos, G.C. Wireless communications andapplications above 100 GHz: Opportunities and challenges for 6G andbeyond. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 78729–78757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemic, F.; Abadal, S.; Tavernier, W.; Stroobant, P.; Colle, D.; Alarcón, E.; Marquez-Barja, J.M.; Famaey, J. Survey on terahertz nanocommunication and networking: A top-down perspective. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2021, 39, 1506–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akyildiz, I.F.; Jornet, J.M. The Internet of nano-things. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2010, 17, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, K.; He, D.; Ai, B.; Chen, Y.; Han, C.; Peng, B.; Zhong, Z.; Kuerner, T. Channel Characterization and Capacity Analysis for THz Communication Enabled Smart Rail Mobility. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2021, 70, 4065–4080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gezimati, M.; Singh, G. Terahertz Imaging and Sensing for Healthcare: Current Status and Future Perspectives. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 18590–18619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bandyopadhyay, A.; Sengupta, A. A review of the concept applications and implementation issues of terahertz spectral imaging technique. IETE Tech. Rev. 2020, 39, 471–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.; Son, J.-H. Machine learning techniques for thz imaging and time-domain spectroscopy. Sensors 2021, 21, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, C.-X.; Huang, J.; Chen, Y. 6G THz Propagation Channel Characteristics and Modeling: Recent Developments and Future Challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2024, 62, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, H.-J.; Lee, N. Terahertz Communications: Challenges in the Next Decade. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 2021, 12, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nawaz, S.J.; Sharma, S.K.; Wyne, S.; Patwary, M.N.; Asaduzzaman, M. Quantum machine learning for 6G communication networks: State-of-the-art and vision for the future. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 46317–46350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botsinis, P.; Alanis, D.; Babar, Z.; Nguyen, H.V.; Chandra, D.; Ng, S.X.; Hanzo, L. Quantum search algorithms for wireless communications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 21, 1209–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarantino, S.; Da Lio, B.; Cozzolino, D.; Bacco, D. Feasibility of quantum communications in aquatic scenarios. Optik 2020, 216, 164639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gyongyosi, L.; Imre, S.; Nguyen, H.V. A survey on quantum channel capacities. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 1149–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, C.H.; Brassard, G.; Crépeau, C.; Jozsa, R.; Peres, A.; Wootters, W.K. Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 1895–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sharma, V.; Banerjee, S. Analysis of quantum key distribution based satellite communication. In Proceedings of the 2018 9th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Bengaluru, India, 11–12 July 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Inoue, K. Quantum key distribution technologies. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2006, 12, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, C.H.; Wiesner, S.J. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 2881–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozenman, G.G.; Kundu, N.K.; Liu, R.; Zhang, L.; Maslennikov, A.; Reches, Y.; Youm, H.Y. The quantum internet: A synergy of quantum information technologies and 6G networks. IET Quantum Commun. 2023, 4, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, T.Q.; Nguyen, L.D.; Narottama, B.; Ansere, J.A.; Huynh, D.V.; Shin, H. Quantum-Inspired Real-Time Optimization for 6G Networks: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Road Ahead. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2022, 3, 1347–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Venturelli, D.; Jamieson, K. Leveraging quantum annealing for large MIMO processing in centralized radio access networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, Beijing, China, 19–23 August 2019; pp. 241–255. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.K.; Jamieson, K.; McMahon, P.L.; Venturelli, D. Ising machines’ dynamics and regularization for near-optimal MIMO detection. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2022, 21, 11080–11094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hurvitz, I.; Karnieli, A.; Arie, A. Frequency-domain engineering of bright squeezed vacuum for continuous-variable quantum information. Opt. Express 2023, 31, 20387–20397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Rahman, A. Quantum-enabled 6G wireless networks: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2022, 29, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, M.; Mashatan, A.; Ghose, S. A review of quantum and hybrid quantum/classical blockchain. Protoc. Inf. Process. 2020, 19, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez-Carames, T.M.; Fraga-Lamas, P. Towards post-quantum blockchain: A review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 21091–21116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wootters, W.K.; Zurek, W.H. A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 1982, 299, 802–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, C.H.; Shor, P.W.; Smolin, J.A.; Thapliyal, A.V. Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and the reverse Shannon theorem. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2002, 48, 2637–2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devetak, I. The private classical capacity and quantum capacity of a quantum channel. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2005, 51, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Ohnishi, K.; Xu, W. Multimodal haptic display for virtual reality: A survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 67, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Microsoft HoloLens 2. Available online: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/ (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Clemm, A.; Vega, M.T.; Ravuri, H.K.; Wauters, T.; De Turck, F. Toward truly immersive holographic-type communication: Challenges and solutions. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strinati, E.C.; Barbarossa, S.; Gonzalez-Jimenez, J.L.; Ktenas, D.; Cassiau, N.; Maret, L.; Dehos, C. 6G: The next frontier: From holographic messaging to artificial intelligence using subterahertz and visible light communication. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2019, 14, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Kaushik, A.; Kumar, A.; Saini, J. Real time estimation and suppression of hand tremor for surgical robotic applications. Microsyst. Technol. 2020, 28, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diana, M.; Marescaux, J. Robotic surgery. J. Br. Surg. 2015, 102, e15–e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Kang, S.; Plishker, W.; Zaki, G.; Kane, T.D.; Shekhar, R. Laparoscopic stereoscopic augmented reality: Toward a clinically viable electromagnetic tracking solution. J. Med. Imaging 2016, 3, 045001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siemonsma, S.; Bell, T. HoloKinect: Holographic 3D video conferencing. Sensors 2022, 22, 8118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bastug, E.; Bennis, M.; Medard, M.; Debbah, M. Toward interconnected virtual reality: Opportunities, challenges, and enablers. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, S.-N.; Kanematsu, H.; Barry, D.M.; Ogawa, N.; Yajima, K.; Nakahira, K.T.; Shirai, T.; Kawaguchi, M.; Kobayashi, T.; Yoshitake, M. Virtual Experiments in metaverse and their applications to collaborative projects: The framework and its significance. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020, 176, 2125–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pathak, P.H.; Feng, X.; Hu, P.; Mohapatra, P. Visible light communication networking and sensing: A survey potential and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015, 17, 2047–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filgueiras, H.R.D.; Lima, E.S.; Cunha, M.S.B.; Lopes, C.H.D.S.; De Souza, L.C.; Borges, R.M.; Pereira, L.A.M.; Brandao, T.H.; Andrade, T.P.V.; Alexandre, L.C.; et al. Wireless and Optical Convergent Access Technologies Toward 6G. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 9232–9259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussein, A.T.; Alresheedi, M.T.; Elmirghani, J.M.H. 20 Gb/s mobile indoor visible light communication system employing beam steering and computer generated holograms. J. Light. Technol. 2015, 33, 5242–5260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, N.; Zhou, Y.; Wei, Y.; Hu, F. Visible light communication in 6G: Advances challenges and prospects. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2020, 15, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katz, M.; Ahmed, I. Opportunities and challenges for visible light communications in 6G. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd 6G Wireless Summit (6G SUMMIT), Levi, Finland, 17–20 March 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Bian, R.; Tavakkolnia, I.; Haas, H. 15.73 Gb/s visible light communication with off-the-shelf leds. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 37, 2418–2424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Na, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, M.; Liu, X.; Xia, J. Modeling and throughput analysis of an ADO-OFDM based relay-assisted VLC system for 5G networks. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 17586–17594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, H.-H.; Tsai, C.-Y. Demonstration of micro-projection enabled short-range communications for 5G. In Proceedings of the 2016 21st OptoElectronics and Communications Conference (OECC) Held Jointly with 2016 International Conference on Photonics in Switching (PS), Niigata, Japan, 3–7 July 2016; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- Grubor, J.; Randel, S.; Langer, K.-D.; Walewski, J.W. Broadband information broadcasting using LED-based interior lighting. J. Light. Technol. 2009, 26, 3883–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, L.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Chow, C.-W.; Chen, G.-H.; Peng, C.-W.; Guo, P.-C.; Tsai, J.-F.; Yeh, C.-H. 6.915-Gbit/s white-light phosphor laser diode-based DCO-OFDM visible light communication (VLC) system with functional transmission distance. Electron. Lett. 2020, 56, 945–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalighi, M.A.; Uysal, M. Survey on free space optical communication: A communication theory perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 2231–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahid, A.; Alsharif, M.H.; Hall, T.J. A contemporary survey on free space optical communication: Potentials technical challenges recent advances and research direction. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022, 200, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X. Free-space optics optimization models for building sway and atmospheric interference using variable Wavelengthieee. Trans. Commun. 2009, 57, 492–498. [Google Scholar]
- Tzanakaki, A.; Anastasopoulos, M.; Berberana, I.; Syrivelis, D.; Flegkas, P.; Korakis, T.; Mur, D.C.; Demirkol, I.; Gutierrez, J.; Grass, E.; et al. Wireless-optical network convergence: Enabling the 5G architecture to support operational and end-user services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2017, 55, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chih-Lin, I.; Li, H.; Korhonen, J.; Huang, J.; Han, L. RAN revolution with NGFI (xHaul) for 5G. J. Light. Technol. 2017, 36, 541–550. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuura, M.; Tajima, N.; Nomoto, H.; Kamiyama, D. 150-W power-over-fiber using double-clad fibers. J. Light. Technol. 2019, 38, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishtiaq, M.; Saeed, N.; Khan, M. Edge Computing in IoT: A 6G Perspective. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.08943. [Google Scholar]
- Alalewi, A.; Dayoub, I.; Cherkaoui, S. On 5G-V2X Use Cases and Enabling Technologies: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 107710–107737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, N.; Almorad, H.; Dahrouj, H.; Al-Naffouri, T.Y.; Shamma, J.S.; Alouini, M.-S. Point-to-Point communication in Integrated Satellite-Aerial 6G Networks: State-of-the-art and future challenges. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2021, 2, 1505–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Renzo, M.; Zappone, A.; Debbah, M.; Alouini, M.-S.; Yuen, C.; de Rosny, J.; Tretyakov, S. Smart Radio Environments Empowered by Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces: How It Works, State of Research, and The Road Ahead. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020, 38, 2450–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Zhang, R. Intelligent reflecting surface enhanced wireless network via joint active and passive beamforming. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2019, 18, 5394–5409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, J.; Zhang, H.; Di, B.; Li, L.; Bian, K.; Song, L.; Li, Y.; Han, Z.; Poor, H.V. Reconfigurable intelligent surface based RF sensing: Design, optimization, and implementation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2020, 38, 2700–2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wymeersch, H.; He, J.; Denis, B.; Clemente, A.; Juntti, M. Radio localization and mapping with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Challenges, opportunities, and research directions. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2020, 15, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Liu, M.; Hui, Y.; Cheng, N.; Li, J. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G IoT Wireless Positioning: A Contemporary Survey. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 23570–23582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Z.; Niu, H.; An, K.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, G.; Chatzinotas, S.; Hu, Y. Refracting RIS-Aided Hybrid Satellite-Terrestrial Relay Networks: Joint Beamforming Design and Optimization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2022, 58, 3717–3724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Mu, X.; Dobre, O.A. STAR-RISs: Simultaneous transmitting and reflecting reconfigurable intelligent surfaces. IEEE Comm. Lett. 2021, 25, 3134–3138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, S.; Rusek, F.; Edfors, O. Beyond massive MIMO: The potential of data transmission with large intelligent surfaces. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2018, 66, 2746–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Zhang, R. Weighted sum power maximization for intelligent reflecting surface aided SWIPT. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 2020, 9, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, H.; Chu, Z.; Zhou, F.; Zhu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wong, K.-K. Weighted sum secrecy rate maximization using intelligent reflecting surface. IEEE Trans. Commun. 2021, 69, 6170–6184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, H.; Chu, Z.; Zhou, F.; Zhu, Z.; Zhen, L.; Wong, K.-K. Robust Design for Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Assisted Secrecy SWIPT Network. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2021, 21, 4133–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Dai, L. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for 6G: Nine Fundamental Issues and One Critical Problem. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 2023, 28, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayajneh, A.M.; Zaidi, S.A.R.; McLernon, D.C.; Ghogho, M. Drone empowered small cellular disaster recovery networks for resilient smart cities. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication and Networking (SECON Workshops), London, UK, 27 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, S.; Ota, K.; Dong, M. UAV base station trajectory optimization based on reinforcement learning in post-disaster search and rescue operations. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2202.10338. [Google Scholar]
- Angjo, J.; Shayea, I.; Ergen, M.; Mohamad, H.; Alhammadi, A.; Daradkeh, Y.I. Handover management of drones in future mobile networks: 6G technologies. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 12803–12823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friderikos, V. Airborne Urban Microcells with Grasping End Effectors: A Game Changer for 6G Networks? In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking (MeditCom), Athens, Greece, 7–10 September 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Gao, Z.; Wu, Y.; Ng, D.W.K.; Gao, X.; Wong, K.; Chatzinotas, S.; Ottersten, B. LEO satellite constellations for 5G and beyond: How will they reshape vertical domains? IEEE Commun. Mag. 2021, 59, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadani, R.; Rakib, S.; Tsatsanis, M.; Monk, A.; Goldsmith, A.J.; Molisch, A.F.; Calderbank, R. Orthogonal time frequency space modulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 19–22 March 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, G.; Zhu, L. Integrated Signal Design of Communication and Navigation Based on LEO Satellite; University of Electronic Science and Technology of China: Chengdu, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, C.; Wu, W.; He, H.; Yang, P.; Lyu, F.; Cheng, N.; Shen, X. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Delay-Oriented IoT Task Scheduling in SAGIN. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun. 2020, 20, 911–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Al-Rubaye, S.; Tsourdos, A. Handover prediction for aircraft dual connectivity using model predictive control. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 44463–44475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warrier, A.; Aljaburi, L.; Whitworth, H.; Al-Rubaye, S.; Tsourdos, A. Future 6G Communications Powering Vertical Handover in Non-Terrestrial Networks. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 33016–33034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghildiyal, Y.; Singh, R.; Alkhayyat, A.; Gehlot, A.; Malik, P.; Sharma, R.; Akram, S.V.; Alkwai, L.M. An imperative role of 6G communication with perspective of industry 4.0: Challenges and research directions, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 56, 103047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The New High Tech Strategy Innovations for Germany. 2014. [Online]. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/hts_broschuere_engl_bf_1.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Kusiak, A. Smart manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 508–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grau, A.; Indri, M.; Bello, L.; Sauter, T.O. Robots in industry. IEEE Ind. Electron. 2021, 15, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aracil, C.; Aziebig, G.; Korondi, P.; Oh, S.; Tan, Z.; Ruderman, M.; He, W.; Ding, L.; Luo, H.; Yin, S.; et al. Toward smart systems. IEEE Ind. Electron. 2021, 15, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Chen, K.-C.; Dong, C.; Nie, Z. 6G Mobile Communications for Multi-Robot Smart Factory. J. ICT Stand. 2021, 9, 371–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, B.; Habibi, M.A.; Richerzhagen, B.; Schindhelm, K.; Zeiger, F.; Lamberti, F.; Pratticò, F.G.; Upadhya, K.; Korovesis, C.; Belikaidis, I.-P.; et al. Digital Twins for Industry 4.0 in the 6G Era. IEEE Open J. Veh. Technol. 2023, 4, 820–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuruvatti, N.P.; Habibi, M.A.; Partani, S.; Han, B.; Fellan, A.; Schotten, H.D. Empowering 6G communication systems with Digital Twin technology: A comprehensive survey of key concepts potential use cases standardization activities and future research directions. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 112158–112186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. 2015. [Online]. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ (accessed on 3 February 2023).
- Mihalj, T.; Li, H.; Babić, D.; Lex, C.; Jeudy, M.; Zovak, G.; Babić, D.; Eichberger, A. Road Infrastructure Challenges Faced by Automated Driving: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noor-A-Rahim, M.; Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Khyam, M.O.; He, J.; Pesch, D.; Moessner, K.; Saad, W.; Poor, H.V. 6G for Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) Communications: Enabling Technologies, Challenges, and Opportunities. Proc. IEEE 2022, 110, 712–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Ahmad, M.; Mishra, D.; Kumari, S.; Khan, M.K. RSEAP: RFID Based Secure and Efficient Authentication Protocol for Vehicular Cloud Computing. Veh. Commun. 2020, 22, 100213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.H.; Lee, C.R.; Lu, W.C.H. Smart In-Car Camera System Using Mobile Cloud Computing Framework for Deep Learning. Veh. Commun. 2017, 10, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yang, H.; Yang, L. Artificial intelligence applications in the development of autonomous vehicles: A survey. IEEE CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2020, 7, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, P.P. Driverless Car-Design of a Parallel and Self-Organizing System; EasyChair: Manchester, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Mendez, J.; Bierzynski, K.; Cuéllar, M.; Morales, D.P. Edge Intelligence: Concepts, architectures, applications and future directions. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. TECS 2022, 21, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rout, R.R.; Vemireddy, S.; Raul, S.K.; Somayajulu, D. Fuzzy logic-based emergency vehicle routing: An IoT system development for smart city applications. Comput. Elect. Eng. 2020, 88, 106839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charoniti, E.; Klunder, G.; Schackmann, P.-P.; Schreuder, M.; de Souza Schwartz, R.; Spruijtenburg, D.; Stelwagen, U.; Wilmink, I. Environmental Benefits of C-V2X for 5GAA-5G Automotive. TNO, TNO Rep. TNO 2020 R11817. 2020. Available online: https://5gaa.org/content/uploads/2020/11/Environmental-Benefits-of-C-V2X.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Lee, G.; Guo, J.; Kim, K.J.; Orlik, P.; Ahn, H.; Di Cairano, S.; Saad, W. Edge computing for interconnected intersections in internet of vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 19 October–13 November 2020; pp. 480–486. [Google Scholar]
- Ageing and Health. 1 October 2022. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed on 27 July 2024).
- Shah, T.; Yavari, A.; Mitra, K.; Saguna, S.; Jayaraman, P.P.; Rabhi, F.; Ranjan, R. Remote health care cyber-physical system: Quality of service (QoS) challenges and opportunities. IET Cyber-Phys. Syst. Theory Appl. 2016, 1, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khullar, V.; Singh, H.P.; Miro, Y.; Anand, D.; Mohamed, H.G.; Gupta, D.; Kumar, N.; Goyal, N. IoT Fog-Enabled Multi-Node Centralized Ecosystem for Real Time Screening and Monitoring of Health Information. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiourti, A.; Nikita, K.S. A review of in-body biotelemetry devices: Implantables, ingestibles, and injectables. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 64, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abbasi, Q.H.; Ur-Rehman, M.; Qaraqe, K.; Alomainy, A. Advances in Body-CentricWireless Communication: Applications and State-of-the-Art; no. 65; Institution of Engineering and Technology: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Movassaghi, S.; Abolhasan, M.; Lipman, J.; Smith, D.; Jamalipour, A. Wireless Body Area Networks: A Survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 1658–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, A.; Xi, R.; Hou, M.; Shah, S.A.; Hameed, S. Harnessing Big Data Analytics for Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Frameworks, Implications, Applications, and Impacts. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 112891–112928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, C.; Koo, B.-H.; Chae, C.-B.; Schober, R. The Internet of bio-nano things in blood vessels: System design and Prototypesj. Commun. Netw. 2023, 25, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmi, K.H.M.; Radzi, N.A.M.; Azhar, N.A.; Samidi, F.S.; Zulkifli, I.T.; Zainal, A.M. Active electric distribution network: Applications, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 134655–134689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khosrojerdi, F.; Akhigbe, O.; Gagnon, S.; Ramirez, A.; Richards, G. Integrating artificial intelligence and analytics in smart grids: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2022, 16, 318–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, A.A.; Hassan, T.M. Smart grid (SG) properties and challenges: An overview. Discov. Energy 2022, 2, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halle, P.D.; Shiyamala, S. Secure advance metering infrastructure protocol for smart grid power system enabled by the Internet of Things. Microprocess. Microsyst. 2022, 95, 104708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goudarzi, A.; Ghayoor, F.; Waseem, M.; Fahad, S. Traore A survey on iot-enabled smart grids: Emerging, applications, challenges, and outlook. Energies 2022, 15, 6984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, H. Alsharif, Abu Jahid, Raju Kannadasan, Mun-Kyeom Kim, Unleashing the potential of sixth generation (6G) wireless networks in smart energy grid management: A comprehensive review. Energy Rep. 2024, 11, 1376–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judge, M.A.; Khan, A.; Manzoor, A.; Khattak, H.A. Overview of smart grid implementation: Frameworks, impact, performance and challenges. J. Energy Storage 2022, 49, 104056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggarwal, S.; Kumar, N.; Tanwar, S.; Alazab, M. A survey on energy trading in the smart grid: Taxonomy, research challenges and solutions. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 116231–116253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arcas, G.I.; Cioara, T.; Anghel, I.; Lazea, D.; Hangan, A. Edge Offloading in Smart Grid. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 680–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afzal, M.; Li, J.; Amin, W.; Huang, Q.; Umer, K.; Ahmad, S.A.; Ahmad, F.; Raza, A. Role of blockchain technology in transactive energy market: A review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 53, 102646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, M.; Ali, M.; Naeem, F.; Poor, H.V. Vulnerability Assessment of 6G-Enabled Smart Grid Cyber–Physical Systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 2020, 8, 5468–5475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Asamoah, K.O.; Xia, Q.; Sifah, E.B.; Amankona, O.I.; Xia, H. A Blockchain Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading System for Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2023, 14, 3944–3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vergara, S.E.; Tchobanoglous, G. Municipal solid waste and the environment: A global perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012, 37, 277–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anagnostopoulos, T.; Zaslavsky, A.; Sosunova, I.; Fedchenkov, P.; Medvedev, A.; Ntalianis, K.; Skourlas, C.; Rybin, A.; Khoruznikov, S. A stochastic multi-agent system for Internet of Things-enabled waste management in smart cities. Waste Manag. Res. J. Sustain. Circ. Econ. 2018, 36, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henaien, A.; Ben Elhadj, H.; Fourati, L.C. A sustainable smart IoT-based solid waste management system. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2024, 157, 587–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, M.M.; Hassanien, E.; Hassanien, A.E. IoT-based intelligent waste management system. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 23551–23579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maoliang, L.; Lin, X. Incentivizing household recycling crowds out public support for other waste management policies: A long-term quasi-experimental study. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belsare, K.; Singh, M.; Gandam, A.; Malik, P.K.; Agarwal, R.; Gehlot, A. An integrated approach of IoT and WSN using wavelet transform and machine learning for the solid waste image classification in smart cities. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2023, 35, e4857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bourougaa-Tria, S.; Mokhati, F.; Tria, H.; Bouziane, O. SPubBin: Smart Public Bin Based on Deep Learning Waste Classification: An IOT system for Smart Environment in Algeria. Informatica 2022, 46, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mookkaiah, S.S.; Thangavelu, G.; Hebbar, R.; Haldar, N.; Singh, H. Design and development of smart Internet of Things–based solid waste management system using computer vision. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 64871–64885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, B.; Chen, X.; Lv, Z.; Li, R.; Fan, S. Optimization of Classified Municipal Waste Collection Based on the Internet of Connected Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2020, 22, 5364–5373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmanifar, G.; Mohammadi, M.; Sherafat, A.; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M.; Fusco, G.; Colombaroni, C. Heuristic approaches to address vehicle routing problem in the Iot-based waste management system. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 220, 119708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kona, V.V.S.; Subramoniam, M. A smart Iot-based waste management system using vehicle shortest path routing and trashcan visiting decision making based ondeep convolutional neural network. Peer-Peer Netw. Appl. 2024, 17, 1051–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehi-Amiri, A.; Akbapour, N.; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M.; Gajpal, Y.; Jabbarzadeh, A. Designing an effective two-stage, sustainable, and IoT based waste management system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, Z. Integration of energy, computation and communication in 6g cellular internet of things. IEEE Commun. Lett. 2020, 24, 1333–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasci, R.A.; Kilinc, F.; Basar, E.; Alexandropoulos, G.C. A New RIS Architecture with a Single Power Amplifier: Energy Efficiency and Error Performance Analysis. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 44804–44815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, U.M.; Javed, M.A.; Zeadally, S.; Islam, S.U. Energy-Efficient Fog Computing for 6G-Enabled Massive IoT: Recent Trends and Future Opportunities. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 9, 14572–14594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossain, M.A.; Hossain, A.R.; Ansari, N. AI in 6G: Energy-Efficient Distributed Machine Learning for Multilayer Heterogeneous Networks. IEEE Netw. 2022, 36, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, S.; Yu, C.; Zhang, K.; Ni, J.; Ci, S. Adaptive and Dynamic Security in AI-Empowered 6G: From an Energy Efficiency Perspective. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 2021, 5, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Zhan, Y.; Zeng, G.; Pan, X. LEO Mega-Constellations for 6G Global Coverage: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 164223–164244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- José, R.; Rodrigues, H. A Review on Key Innovation Challenges for Smart City Initiatives. Smart Cities 2024, 7, 141–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, Y.; Boland, R.J.; Lyytinen, K.; Majchrzak, A. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 2012, 23, 1398–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zittrain, J.L. The Generative Internet; The Harvard Law Review Association: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Goumopoulos, C. Smart City Middleware: A Survey and a Conceptual Framework. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 4015–4047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, K.-C.; Chu, K.-C.; Wang, H.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; Pan, J.-S. Agent-based middleware framework using distributed CPS for improving resource utilization in smart city. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2020, 108, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puiu, D.; Barnaghi, P.; Tonjes, R.; Kumper, D.; Ali, M.I.; Mileo, A.; Parreira, J.X.; Fischer, M.; Kolozali, S.; Farajidavar, N.; et al. CityPulse: Large scale data analytics framework for smart cities. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 1086–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cirillo, F.; Solmaz, G.; Berz, E.L.; Bauer, M.; Cheng, B.; Kovacs, E. A standard-based open source IoT platform: FIWARE. IEEE Internet Things Mag. 2019, 2, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pliatsios, A.; Lymperis, D.; Goumopoulos, C. S2NetM: A semantic social network of things middleware for developing smart and collaborative IoT-based solutions. Future Internet 2023, 15, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Parameter | 5G | 6G |
---|---|---|
Data Rate, Band | ~20 Gbps, sub-6 GHz, Crowded | ~1 TBPS, ultra-fast (THz) |
Services | Limited capability to support new communication | Holographic communication, augmented reality, immersive gaming, etc. |
Latency | Low latency | Ultra-low latency and high reliability |
Architecture | Massive MIMO | Cell-free massive MIMO, intelligent surfaces |
Coverage | Infrastructure-based | Ubiquitous connectivity (space–air–ground–sea) |
Security | Security issues | Blockchain and quantum communication. |
AI Integration | Partial | Full |
Satellite Integration | No | Full |
Source Databases | IEEE Xplore, Web of Science (WoS), Taylor and Francis, ASCE Library, Scopus, and Springer |
---|---|
Search String | (“Artificial Intelligence” OR “THz” OR “ISAC” OR “Block Chain” OR “UAV”) AND (“6G”) AND (“Smart Cities”) |
Time period | 2019–2024 |
Article Type | Journal, Review, Letter, Book Chapter, Short Survey, Article |
Language Restriction | English |
Included Subject Area | Computer Science, Engineering, Energy, Business, Management and Accounting, Mathematics, Environmental Science, Decision Sciences |
Excluded Subject Area | Chemical Engineering, Arts and Humanities, Health Professions, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Neuroscience, Multidisciplinary, Psychology, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, Immunology and Microbiology, Nursing, Social Sciences, Economics Econometrics and Finance, Physics and Astronomy, Materials Science, Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Chemistry, Earth and Planetary Sciences |
Ref. | Authors | Year of Public. | Research Area | Major Contribution |
---|---|---|---|---|
[17] | Fong, B et al. | 2023 | Vehicular | Investigates technical issues regarding the design and implementation of vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) systems to enhance reliability in a smart city with 6G as backbone. |
[18] | P Mishra et al. | 2023 | IoT, Vision | Proposes framework, architecture and requirements for 6G IoT network. Discusses emerging technologies for 6G concerning artificial intelligence/machine learning, sensing networks, spectrum bands, and security. |
[19] | Nahid Parvaresh, Burak Kantarci, | 2023 | UAV base station | Network performance of UAV-BS is improved by use of proposed continuous actor-critic deep reinforcement learning method to address the 3D location optimization issue of UAV-BSs in smart cities. |
[20] | Z. Yang et al. | 2023 | Edge cloud, Energy efficiency | Paper analyzes challenges in developing a low-carbon smart city in 6G-enabled smart cities. Also proposes a visual end-edge-cloud architecture (E 2 C) that is AI-driven for attaining low carbon emission in smart cities. |
[21] | N. Sehito et al. | 2024 | IRS, UAV, NOMA, Spectral efficiency | Paper introduces a new optimization scheme by utilizing IRSs in NOMA multi-UAV networks in 6G-enabled smart cities, resulting in significant performance enhancement in terms of spectral efficiency. |
[22] | Prabhat Ranjan Singh et al. | 2023 | AI, Technology evolution, Smart city applications | Paper covers evolution of network technology, AI approaches for 6G systems, importance of AI in advanced network model development in 6G-enabled smart city applications. |
[23] | Murroni, M et al. | 2023 | Vision, Enabling technologies | Paper furnishes an update on the smart city arena with the use of 6G. Paper describes the role of enabling technologies and their specific employment plans. |
[24] | Kamruzzaman | 2022 | IoT, Energy efficiency, Use cases | Presents key technologies, their applications, and IoT technologies trends for energy-efficient 6G-enabled smart city. Also, identifies and discusses key enabling technologies. |
[25] | Kim, N et al. | 2024 | Standardization and key enabling technologies | Paper provides key features and recent trends in standardization of smart city concept. Paper highlights potential key technologies of 6G that can be used in various urban use cases in 6G-enabled smart cities. |
[26] | Ismail, L.; Buyya, R | 2022 | AI-enabled 6G smart cities | Discusses evolution of wireless-technology generations, AI implementation in 6G and its self-learning models in smart city applications. |
[27] | Zakria Qadir et al. | 2023 | Survey, IoT | Emerging 6G connectivity solutions and their applications in IoT to serve smart cities are surveyed in this paper. |
[28] | Misbah Shafi et al. | 2024 | 6G technologies | The framework of 6G network is presented with its key technologies that have substantial effect on the key performance indicators of a wireless communication network. |
Natural Resources and Energy | Mobility and Transport | Living and Environment | People and Economy | Government |
---|---|---|---|---|
Smart Grid. | People Mobility. | Pollution Control. | Education and School. | e-Governance. |
Public Lighting. | City Logistics. | Public Safety. | Entertainment and Culture. | Transparency. |
Waste Management. | Health Care. | Entrepreneurship and Innovation. | ||
Water Management | Public Spaces | |||
Welfare Services. | ||||
Smart Homes. |
Ref. | THz | AI | BC | QC | NTN (UAV) | MEC | RIS | ISAC | HC | VLC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[32] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[26] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
[33] | √ | |||||||||
[34] | √ | |||||||||
[35] | ||||||||||
[36] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[37] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[38] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[39] | √ | |||||||||
[40] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[41] | √ | |||||||||
[42] | √ | |||||||||
[43] | √ | √ | √ | |||||||
[44] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[45] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[19] | √ | |||||||||
[46] | √ | |||||||||
[47] | √ | |||||||||
[48] | √ | √ | ||||||||
[49] | √ | |||||||||
[47] | √ | |||||||||
[50] | √ | |||||||||
[51] | √ | |||||||||
[52] | √ | |||||||||
[17] | √ | |||||||||
[25] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||||
[22] | √ | √ | √ | |||||||
[24] | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||||
This Paper | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Potential 6G Technology | Brief Description |
---|---|
Artificial Intelligence (AI) | AI can be used to analyze, manage and optimize resources and to efficiently support 6G networks. AI can be used for tasks like efficient channel estimation, energy efficiency, modulation recognition, data caching, traffic prediction, radio resource management, mobility management, etc. |
Terahertz Communication (THz) | Uses frequency band 0.1 to 10 THz. Ability to attain ultra-high (up to 1 Tbps) data rates and wide bandwidth. |
Blockchain (BC) | A type of distributed ledger technology to ensure safety, privacy, scalability and reliability in this complex heterogeneous architecture. |
Quantum Computing (QC) | Based on quantum no-cloning theorem and the principle of uncertainty, absolute randomness is introduced by the use of the quantum nature of information, which provides security and enhanced channel capacity. |
Non Terrestrial networks (NTN) | Includes drones and satellites and is used to extend coverage footprint of terrestrial base stations, provide additional capacity in dense urban hotspots. Used in disaster recovery and remote or rural areas. |
Mobile Edge Communication (MEC) | By placing computing resources closer to end user, it reduces delays and latency and enhances processing speed and on-premise security |
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) | Optimizes the allocation of scarce resources and contributes to better decision-making processes by combining both sensing and communication tasks, which enhances efficiency. |
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs) | A planar surface with array of passive elements whose characteristics can be altered dynamically. Used in 6G-THz to improve coverage, NLOS scenarios. |
Holographic Communication (HC) | HC is an application used in transmitting human-sized immersive and interactive holograms consisting of 3D videos and images that require extremely high data rates with ultra-low latency. |
Visible Light Communication (VLC) | VLC offers numerous advantages, such as, energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, un-licensed spectrum, no electromagnetic interference, secure access technology, and large bandwidth. |
Ref. | Year | Application Domain of Smart Cities | Technologies Used | Areas/Topics Covered |
---|---|---|---|---|
[123] | 2024 | V2X | 6G, Blockchain, Federated learning, Fog Computing | Comprehensive V2X security analysis. Future research direction for privacy in XR, secure SDN, physical layer security in THz. |
[129] | 2024 | Smart Traffic Management | Edge Computing, Blockchain, Reinforced learning | Traffic optimization is achieved by decentralized integration of IoT sensors on vehicles and traffic signals and edge devices and the use of BC rules for real-time decisions. |
[130] | 2024 | Supply Chain Management | Blockchain, IoT, Edge Computing | A Blockchain-based and IoT-enabled transparent and secure supply chain management framework is proposed for public emergency services in smart cities. |
[131] | 2023 | Intelligent Transport System (ITS) | Blockchain | An ITS cross-domain data interaction framework between devices and agencies is proposed to achieve secure and efficient cross-chain communication. |
[36] | 2023 | IoT | Blockchain, Big Data, AI | Framework and architecture based on Blockchain, AI and Big Data. |
[39] | 2023 | Industrial Applications | 6G, Blockchain, IoT | Case study of smart supply chain. Benefits and challenges of BT and 6G-IoT |
[132] | 2023 | IoD (Internet of Drones) | 6G, Blockchain | Analysis of multilayered Blockchain-IoD novel Global Compliance System (GCoS) and Swarm Security (Sse) system |
[133] | 2023 | IoT-Blockchain efficiency | 6G, IoT-oriented Blockchain | Improves Blockchain-IoT performance by targeted optimization to improve low power efficiency and slow ledger synchronization. |
[134] | 2022 | IoV | 6G, Blockchain | A survey paper for BC in IoVs sharing underlying 6G technology. Explores how privacy and security issues in IoVs can be tackled using BC technology. |
[135] | 2022 | Food Supply Chain Management | IoT, Blockchain | Blockchain enables traceability of food supply from factories/fields to the customer’s table. IoT devices probe food condition. |
Use Case | Description |
---|---|
Remote Surgery |
|
Holographic Teleconferencing |
|
Immersive Gaming |
|
Metaverse |
|
Tech. | Applications/Benefits | Challenges |
---|---|---|
AI |
| |
ISAC |
| |
THz |
| |
BC |
| |
QC |
|
|
NTN |
|
|
MEC |
|
|
RIS |
| |
IC |
| |
VLC |
|
|
Application (Use Case) | Benefits | Devices/Tech Used |
---|---|---|
Smart Routing | Avoidance of traffic congestion. Useful for emergency vehicles. Traffic balancing on roads. Reduction in emissions [240] Reduce delays. | IOT sensors. Vehicle ad-hoc networks. AI real-time routing algorithms [239]. Cloud and edge computing for data processing and analysis. |
Smart Parking | Contribution to sustainability. Optimal utilization of parking spaces. Reduced time for drivers to search for parking spaces. | V2V and V2I communication. Use of sensors for indicating parking status. AI and cloud computing. |
Speed Harmonization | Reduces frequent need for acceleration and deceleration. Continuous traffic flow. Reduces emissions. Safe travel. | AI and cloudification. Green-light coordination. |
Green Driving | Reduction of fuel consumption. Reduction of pollution near critical areas like hospitals. | Collection of pollution data by roadside sensors. Data transfer to centralized cloud. Traffic management decision based on AI algorithm. On-road displays for flashing traffic management decisions. |
Coordinated Maneuvers | Smooth traffic flow. Emission reduction. | V2I information exchange among vehicles and RSU [241]. Low-latency, low-delay transmission. Advanced AI implemented at edge for delay-free decisions. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sharma, S.; Popli, R.; Singh, S.; Chhabra, G.; Saini, G.S.; Singh, M.; Sandhu, A.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, R. The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167039
Sharma S, Popli R, Singh S, Chhabra G, Saini GS, Singh M, Sandhu A, Sharma A, Kumar R. The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges. Sustainability. 2024; 16(16):7039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167039
Chicago/Turabian StyleSharma, Sanjeev, Renu Popli, Sajjan Singh, Gunjan Chhabra, Gurpreet Singh Saini, Maninder Singh, Archana Sandhu, Ashutosh Sharma, and Rajeev Kumar. 2024. "The Role of 6G Technologies in Advancing Smart City Applications: Opportunities and Challenges" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167039