Sustainable Collaboration and Incentive Policies for the Integration of Professional Education and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education (IPEIEE)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Integration of Professional Education and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education (IPEIEE)
2.2. Game Theory (GT)
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Socio-Ecosystem Framework of the Sustainable Development of the IPEIEE
3.2. Defining Synthetic Value of IPEIEE
3.3. Dynamic Game Modeling of Teachers and Students
3.3.1. Fundamental Assumption
- Two players
- 2.
- Strategy sets
- 3.
- Cost
- 4.
- Income
- 5.
- Probability
3.3.2. Constructing an Evolutionary Game Model of Students and Teachers
3.3.3. Analyzing Stability Strategies of Teachers
3.3.4. Analyzing Student Stability Strategies
3.4. Introducing University Behavior
3.5. Construct the Principal–Agent Model
3.5.1. The Optimal Incentive Model in the Case of Information Symmetry
3.5.2. The Optimal Incentive Model in the Case of Non-Information Symmetry
4. Results
4.1. Analysis of the Results of the Game between Educators and Students
4.2. Introduction of Behavioral Analysis in Universities
4.2.1. A Study of Teachers’ Stability Strategies Following the Introduction of University Behaviors
4.2.2. Analysis of Students’ Stabilizing Habits Strategies after Introducing University Behaviors
4.3. Analysis of the Results of the Incentive Model
5. Incentive Mechanism Design and Policy Recommendation
5.1. Incentive Mechanism
- Incentives for teachers in undergraduate education
- 2.
- Incentives for students
5.2. Design for Incentives Mechanism
5.3. Recommendations of Incentive Policy
5.3.1. Legal Policy Instruments and Methods
- Intensify the construction of the policy evaluation index system
- 2.
- Perfect the laws and regulations of IPEIEE and form a policy-based guarantee system.
- 3.
- Develop policy-supporting system for IPEIEE
5.3.2. Administrative Tools and Methods
- Professional Teachers Motivated to Take the Initiative to Implement Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education
- 2.
- Encourage students to actively participate in innovation and entrepreneurship education
- 3.
- Strengthen resource input and public opinion guidance to enhance the influence of innovation and entrepreneurship education
- 4.
- Adjust teaching strategies and optimizing traditional educational resources
5.3.3. Information Technology Means and Methods
- Build an all-media information service mechanism for students’ innovation and entrepreneurship
- 2.
- Create two environments for school–enterprise cooperation and innovation
- 3.
- Strengthen the construction of full-time teachers with innovation and entrepreneurship capability in universities
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liu, W. How is “Specialized Innovation Integration” Possible in Colleges and Universities—Analysis Based on the Essential Characteristics and Relationship between the Two. Fudan Educ. Forum 2022, 20, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, F. Innovative Strategies of Training Mechanism of Higher Education for New Entrepreneurial Talents. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duan, S.; Dai, Z.; Liu, L. The purpose, dilemma and path of internationalization of higher education from the perspective of Chinese modernization. Mod. Educ. Manag. 2024, 8, 31–42. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H. Innovation and entrepreneurship education: The cornerstone of Chinese-style education modernization. Jiangsu High. Educ. 2023, 9, 12–20. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.; Liu, W. Research on the Cultivation Path of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Talents in Colleges and Universities in the New Era. In 2021 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers (IPEC2021); Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 531–534. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D. On the curriculum construction of “integration of specialty and innovation. Chuangxin Chuangye Jiaoyu 2022, 13, 84–88. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, L. The path of innovation and entrepreneurship education in higher vocational colleges based on the perspective of integration of specialty and innovation. Hum. Resour. Dev. 2022, 22, 71–72. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, D. Evolutionary games in economics. Econom. Econ. Soc. 1991, 59, 637–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilman, A.R.; Plotkin, J.B.; Akçay, E. Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, X.; Jiang, J.; Su, Z. Research on incentive strategy of postgraduate training based on tripartite evolutionary game. Math. Pract. Underst. 2023, 53, 106–117. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, J.; Jia, W. Research on the Evolution Analysis of College Teaching Based on Tripartite Game Model. Oper. Res. Fuzziol. 2022, 12, 1280–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Witt, N. Soviet Professional Manpower: Its Education, Training, and Supply; National Science Foundation: Washington, DC, USA, 1955; pp. 106–107. [Google Scholar]
- Rashdall, H. The Universities Europe in the Middle Ages; Powick, E.M., Emdeu, A.B., Eds.; Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford, UK, 1936; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, J.; Soper, J.; Facca, T. Creativity in the entrepreneurship classroom. J. Entrep. Ship Educ. 2012, 5, 123–131. [Google Scholar]
- Timmons, J.A. NEW Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century; Irwin: Boston, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Katz, J.A. The chronology and intellectual trajectory of American entrepreneurship education: 1876–1999. J. Bus. Ventur. 2003, 18, 283–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neck, H.M.; Greene, P.G. Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new Frontiers. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2011, 49, 55–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdul, G. Convergence between 21st Century Skills and Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education Institutes. Int. J. High. Educ. 2020, 1, 218–229. [Google Scholar]
- Noll, C.L. Planning curriculum for entrepreneurship education. Bus. Educ. Forum 1993, 47, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Kourilsky, M.L. Entrepreneurship Education: Opportunity in Search of Curriculum Kauffman Center for entrepreneurial Leadership. Bus. Educ. Forum 1995, 50, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
- Otte, T.G. Cherchez le Boche? Reflection on Germany’s Utopian Twentieth Century. Mediterr. Q. 2002, 13, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winslow, E.K.; Solomon, G.T.; Tarabishy, A. Emprical Innovation Investigation into Entrepreneurship Education in the United States: Some Results of the 1997 National Survey of Entrepreneurship Education. In Proceedings of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship (USASBE), San Diego, CA, USA, 14–17 January 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Solomon, G.T.; Duffy, S.; Tarabishy, A. The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis. Int. J. Entrep. Educ. 2002, 1, 65–86. [Google Scholar]
- Streeter, D.H.; Jaquette, J.P., Jr.; Hovis, K. University-Wide Entrepreneurship Education: Alternative Models and Current Trends; Cornell University: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Rasmussen, E.A.; Sørheim, R. Aetion-based entrepreneurship education. Teehnovation 2006, 26, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyers, A.D.; Hurley, P. Bioentrepreneurship education programs in the United States. J. Commer. Biotechnol. 2008, 14, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vespe, K.H.; Gartner, W.B. Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. J. Bus. Ventur. 1997, 12, 403–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, P.; Haynes, M. Entrepreneurship Education in America’s major universities. Entrep. Educ. Pract. 1991, 15, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewis, H. A Model of Entrepreneurial Capability Based on a Holistic Review of the Literature from Three Academic Domain. Ind. High. Educ. 2011, 25, 429–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Guardia, D.; Gentile, M.; Grande, V.D.; Ottaviano, S.; Allegra, M. A Game Based Learning Model for Entrepreneurship Education. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 141, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibb, A. Entrepreneurship: Unique solutions for unique environments. Is it possible to achieve this with the existing paradigm? Int. J. Entrep. Educ. 2007, 5, 93–142. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, E.; Lei, H. Curriculum System Construction and Teaching Reform of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Courses in Higher Vocational Colleges from the Perspective of Integration of Professional and Innovation. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2023, 5, 17. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhou, F.; Liu, J.; Guo, L.; Chen, F.; Cai, M.; Chen, J.; Bai, J.; Cheng, Q.; et al. Research on the Construction of Industrial Catalysis Course under the Background of Specialty-Innovation Integration. J. Contemp. Educ. Res. 2023, 7, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, J.; Li, Y. Exploration on Teaching Reform and Construction of the Curriculum of Integration of Professional and Innovation in Automobile CAD. Adv. Educ. Technol. Psychol. 2023, 7, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- Kuratko, D.F. The Emergence of Entrepreneurship Education: Development, Trends and Challenges. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2005, 29, 577–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spern, W.; Chen, W. How to understand game theory. Philos. Anal. 2019, 10, 131. [Google Scholar]
- Von Stengel, B. Fundamentals of Game Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Peters, H. Game Theory: A Multi-Leveled Approach; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Neumann, J.V.; Morgenstern, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 1944. [Google Scholar]
- Sandholm, W.H. Evolutionary Game Theory. In Complex Social and Behavioral Systems: Game Theory and Agent-Based Models; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 573–608. [Google Scholar]
- Wooldridge, M. Does Game Theory Work? IEEE Intell. Syst. 2012, 27, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rass, S.; Schauer, S. Game Theory of Safety and Risk Management; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chalkiadakis, G.; Elkind, E.; Wooldridge, M. Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Sohrabi, M.K.; Azgomi, H. A Survey on the Combined Use of Optimization Methods and Game Theory. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2018, 27, 59–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacuit, E.; Roy, O. Epistemic Foundations of Game Theory. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; 2013; Available online: https://plato.stanford.edu/entrieS/epistemic-game/ (accessed on 11 June 2024).
- Colman, A.M. Game Theory and Experimental Game: A Study of Strategic Interaction; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Song, J.; Li, H.; Coupechoux, M. Network Game Theory. Mob. Netw. Appl. 2021, 26, 489–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leyton-Brown, K.; Shoham, Y. Essentials of Game Theory: A Concise Multidisciplinary Introduction; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Eissa, R.; Eid, M.S.; Elbeltagi, E. Current Applications of Game Theory in Construction Engineering and Management Research: A Social Network Analysis Approach. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2021, 147, 04021066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang, F.; Liu, S.; Basak, A.; Zhu, Q.; Kiekintveld, C.D.; Kamhoua, C.A. Introduction to game theory. In Game Theory and Machine Learning for Cyber Security; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 21–46. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, L.; Qi, N.; Chu, F.; Fang, S.; Wang, X.; Ma, S.; Feng, S. Game-theoretic learning anti-jamming approaches in wireless networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2022, 60, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashai, N.; Adler, N. Internalization choice under competition: Game theory method. J. Glob. Strategy 2019, 11, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clippel, G.; Rozen, K. Fairness through the Lens of Cooperative Game Theory: An Experimental Approach. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 2022, 14, 810–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosworth, W. Social Power and Non-cooperative Game Theory. J. Theor. Politics 2022, 34, 262–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krueger, J.I.; Heck, P.R.; Evans, A.M.; DiDonato, T.E. Social Game Theory: Preference, Perception and Choice. Eur. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2020, 31, 222–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, J.; Zhou, W.; Zhu, B. Coordination of stakeholders’ interests in environmental regulation: Lessons from China’s environmental regulation policy from the perspective of evolutionary game. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, T.-M.; Taleizadeh, A.A.; Yue, X. Application of game theory in production research in the era of sharing and circular economy. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagurney, A. Game theory network modeling of supply chain under labor constraints: Application in COVID-19 pandemic. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2021, 293, 880–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamburger, H. Games as Models of Social Phenomena; Freeman: New York, NY, USA, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Correa, H.; Gruver, G.W. Teacher-student interaction: A game theoretic extension of the economic theory of education. Math. Soc. Sci. 1987, 13, 19–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correa, H.A. Game Theoretic Analysis of Faculty Competition and Academic Standards. High. Educ. Policy 2001, 14, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correa, H. A game theoretical analysis of the educational impact of differences in the abilities and work ethics of teachers and students. J. Socio-Econ. 2003, 32, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Correa, H. A game theoretic analysis of teacher-student interaction, classsize and achievement. Sci. Paedagog. Exp. 1997, 34, 13–38. [Google Scholar]
- Correa, H. A mathematical model of teacher–student interaction. In Proceedings of the Instruments Society of America Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Pittsburgh Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 24–26 April 1974; pp. 33–52. [Google Scholar]
- Eiszler, C.F. College Students’ Evaluations of Teaching and Grade Inflation. Res. High. Educ. 2002, 43, 483–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crumbley, D.L.; Flinn, R.E.; Reichelt, K.J. What is Ethical about Grade Inflation and Coursework Deflation? J. Acad. Ethics 2010, 8, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hans, B. The variation in teachers’ grading practices: Causes and consequences. Econ. Educ. Rev. 1999, 18, 89–106. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, Z. Using Game Theory to Analyze the Interaction between Teachers and Students in the Teaching of Civics in College Courses. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2024, 9, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Ren, X.; Zhao, C.; Shi, L.; Ren, Y.; Wang, G. Driving mechanism of chemical industrial parkization in China: A game theory analysis based on a social-ecological system framework. China Environ. Manag. 2019, 11, 38–46. [Google Scholar]
- Deng, H.; Lai, Y. Exploration on the teaching reform of dual-creation courses under the background of “specialization and innovation fusion”—Taking Hezhou College as an example. J. Hezhou Coll. 2022, 38, 118–121. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.; Huang, C. Exploration of talent cultivation mode of “learning, researching, creating and utilizing” in universities under the perspective of “specialization and innovation fusion”. Ind. Technol. Forum 2022, 21, 143–144. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C. Exploration of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Cultivation Practices in Universities under the Perspective of “Specialized Creation Integration”. Innov. Entrep. Theory Res. Pract. 2022, 5, 113–115. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, H.; Wei, X. Government Positioning Theory and the Reform of Separation of Administration, Running, and Evaluation in Higher Education. Jiangsu High. Educ. 2017, 5, 19–24. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.; Zhan, L.; Hu, Y. A dilemma Analysis and Resolving Strategy of Educational Resources Sharing in Western Universities from the Perspective of Game Theory. J. Tibet Univ. Soc. Sci. 2022, 2, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; Cui, Y. The Evolution of Higher Education Integration in the Yangtze River Delta and Its Dynamic Mechanism. J. High. Educ. 2020, 01, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
- Song, L. Dilemmas and Countermeasures in the Integration of Entrepreneurship Education and Professional Education from the Perspective of Game Theory. Educ. Rev. 2017, 10, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
Students | ) | ) | |
---|---|---|---|
Teachers | |||
S ( | |||
NS ( |
Students | |||
---|---|---|---|
Teachers | |||
) | |||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, H.; Fu, G.; Wu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Nie, X.; Zhao, W. Sustainable Collaboration and Incentive Policies for the Integration of Professional Education and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education (IPEIEE). Sustainability 2024, 16, 7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177558
Chen H, Fu G, Wu H, Xiao Y, Nie X, Zhao W. Sustainable Collaboration and Incentive Policies for the Integration of Professional Education and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education (IPEIEE). Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177558
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Hui, Guanghui Fu, Huiqin Wu, Yao Xiao, Xuan Nie, and Wenjin Zhao. 2024. "Sustainable Collaboration and Incentive Policies for the Integration of Professional Education and Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education (IPEIEE)" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177558