Next Article in Journal
Understanding Food Insecurity and Participation in Food Assistance Programs among Hispanic/Latino Residents of Hialeah, Florida, before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
After-Hours Work Challenges and Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Systematic Review

Overcoming Deterrents to Modular Construction in Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review

by
Ayaz Ahmad Khan
1,
Mehdi Amirkhani
1,2,* and
Igor Martek
3
1
Australian Research Centre for Interactive and Virtual Environments (IVE), UniSA Creative, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
2
UniSA Online, Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
3
School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Waterfront Campus, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7611; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177611 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 July 2024 / Revised: 29 August 2024 / Accepted: 1 September 2024 / Published: 2 September 2024

Abstract

The study aims to identify and categorise the deterrents to adopting modular construction (MC) in affordable housing (AH), revealing their interconnections, and proposing strategies to overcome them. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted, followed by Pareto analysis and total interpretive structural modelling (TISM). A total of 75 deterrents were identified from 46 studies, spanning 7 categories: environmental, social and cultural, technical and construction, industry and market, administrative and bureaucratic, economic, and regulatory and policy. The top deterrent category was found to be economic, specifically high initial investment costs and financing challenges. Significant deterrents, particularly economic ones, that impede the adoption of MC in AH are revealed. The interconnectedness of these deterrents highlights the need for comprehensive strategies addressing multiple categories simultaneously. Mitigation strategies and countermeasures are proposed to facilitate the adoption of MC. The study is based on the existing literature, which may have limitations in terms of capturing all possible deterrents. Further empirical research is needed to validate and expand upon these findings. A critical gap is filled by this study, which systematically categorises and analyses deterrents to MC in AH and proposes actionable strategies to mitigate them, thereby contributing to more effective and widespread adoption of MC. The findings are valuable to both global audiences and Australian stakeholders and provide insights that allow the barriers to MC in AH to be overcome.
Keywords: modular construction; affordable housing; Pareto analysis; total interpretive structural modelling modular construction; affordable housing; Pareto analysis; total interpretive structural modelling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, A.A.; Amirkhani, M.; Martek, I. Overcoming Deterrents to Modular Construction in Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177611

AMA Style

Khan AA, Amirkhani M, Martek I. Overcoming Deterrents to Modular Construction in Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177611

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Ayaz Ahmad, Mehdi Amirkhani, and Igor Martek. 2024. "Overcoming Deterrents to Modular Construction in Affordable Housing: A Systematic Review" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177611

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop