The Interplay of Environmental Dynamism, Digitalization Capability, Green Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Sustainable Performance

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

Thank you for sending your paper to the journal; the topic is quite interesting but needs much more efforts in the following sections:

1- First of all it is highly recommended to conduct proofreading on the paper.

2-The theoretical issues and hypothesis development should have conjunctions each other; further, it is recommended to improve the mentioned parts by the most recent studies in a logical method to well support the hypothesis.

3-What are the research population? How the sample is selected?

4- The main concern is about your instrument for data collection. Almost all variables are quantitative and they are available in databases but you employed a questionnaire in the study. What is the reason(s) behind?

5-The practical and managerial implications should be stated according to the findings

6- The questionnaire should be appears in the appendix of the paper.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The paper needs to conduct proofreading by a native English speaker

Author Response

 "Please see the attachment." 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Report is attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Consider having the article proofread by a native speaker.

Author Response

 "Please see the attachment." 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The study concerns an interesting and important issue. The article layout is clear, and the research methodology is logical and rational. Moreover, a broad review of the literature characterizes the article. To improve the study, I propose a few changes.
1. The aim of the study is presented in the abstract, but it is pretty complex. I propose simplifying the article's objective and presenting it also in the main body.
2. In my opinion, the research methodology and results should be given in two separate chapters. The methodological chapter should contain information about the research and the data analysis methods. In this respect, the literature review should be mentioned. The research results should be presented in the following subchapter.
3. The conclusions in the article are very limited. In principle, the authors repeated the research's purpose and indicated the study's limitations. I encourage the authors to prepare broader conclusions from the research.

Author Response

 "Please see the attachment." 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

Thank you for sending your revised manuscript; the current version is improved and you addressed all issues in the current draft.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The revised version of the paper effectively incorporates my suggestions, significantly enhancing its research impact and overall quality.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

 Minor editing of English language required.