Next Article in Journal
Linking Environmental Sustainability and Financial Resilience through the Environmental Footprints and Their Determinants: A Panel Data Approach for G7 Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Equity and Inclusion in Climate Action and Adaptation Plans of Michigan Cities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management Control Systems and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Corporate Financial Performance vs. Corporate Sustainability Performance, between Earnings Management and Process Improvement

by
Valentin Burcă
*,
Oana Bogdan
,
Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget
and
Alin-Constantin Dumitrescu
Department of Accounting and Audit, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, West University of Timisoara, J.H. Pestalozzi, no. 16, 300115 Timisoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7744; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177744
Submission received: 25 June 2024 / Revised: 26 August 2024 / Accepted: 30 August 2024 / Published: 5 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management Control Systems to Sustainability)

Abstract

The main objective of the paper is to assess the relationship between firms’ financial resilience and firms’ strategic sustainable development vulnerabilities, in the context of implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ business environment. Background: The last decade has emphasized an increase in business models’ uncertainty and risk exposure. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the awareness in this direction, especially in a changing context, that looks more and more for corporate sector operations’ orientation towards sustainable development. The question we would address in this paper is how the nexus between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial resilience is affected by management decision through process improvements, product quality assurance, or managers’ preference to improve corporate financials by earnings management practice instead, especially in the context of specific corporate financial risk management. Methods: The data are extracted from the Refinitiv database. The sample is limited to 271 European Union listed firms, selected based on data availability. The empirical analysis consists of an OLS multiple regression. For robustness purposes, a quantile regression model is estimated as well. Results: The approach considers implications of the pandemic on firms’ business environment and earnings management accounting based policies and strategies as well. The result suggests that alignment to sustainability frameworks lead to the deterioration of firms’ financial resilience. Similar results show the negative impact of firms’ financial vulnerability (credit default risk) on firms’ financial resilience. Instead, the risk of bankruptcy, firms’ liquidity, or high product quality and business process improvement determine the positive impact on firms’ financial resilience. Conclusions: The study highlights several insights both for management and policy makers. First, the results underline the relevance of management’s choice for earnings management on ensuring firms’ financial resilience, which ask for better corporate governance and high-quality and effective institutional regulatory and enforcement mechanisms. Second, the paper brings evidence on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ financial sustainable development. Third, the study emphasizes the importance of the efforts of corporate process improvements and high-quality products on generating value-add, by looking on the relevance of those drivers on the level of corporate economic value-add, a measure that limits the impact of discretionary management accrual-based accounting choices on our discussion.
Keywords: financial resilience; sustainability; business process; economic value added; TQM financial resilience; sustainability; business process; economic value added; TQM

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Burcă, V.; Bogdan, O.; Bunget, O.-C.; Dumitrescu, A.-C. Corporate Financial Performance vs. Corporate Sustainability Performance, between Earnings Management and Process Improvement. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177744

AMA Style

Burcă V, Bogdan O, Bunget O-C, Dumitrescu A-C. Corporate Financial Performance vs. Corporate Sustainability Performance, between Earnings Management and Process Improvement. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177744

Chicago/Turabian Style

Burcă, Valentin, Oana Bogdan, Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget, and Alin-Constantin Dumitrescu. 2024. "Corporate Financial Performance vs. Corporate Sustainability Performance, between Earnings Management and Process Improvement" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7744. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177744

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop