Water Ecological Security Pattern Based on Hydrological Regulation Service: A Case Study of the Upper Hanjiang River
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Site
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) Model Construction
2.2.2. Verification of Model
2.2.3. Representation Method of Water Purification Service in River Basin
2.2.4. Methods for Obtaining Service of Storage Regulation and Rainwater Infiltration
2.2.5. Red Line Acquisition Method of Watershed Ecohydrological Regulation
3. Results
3.1. Analysis of Water Quality Simulation Results
3.2. Water Purification Service and Safety Classification
3.3. Flood Regulation and Storage Service in the Upper Reaches of Hanjiang River
3.4. Rain and Flood Infiltration Service in the Upper Hanjiang River Basin and Safety Classification
3.5. Safety Pattern Identification of Hydrological Regulation Service
4. Discussion
4.1. Research Objective and Feasibility Analysis
4.2. Analysis of Research Results
4.3. Comparison with Previous Studies
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Feng, Y.; Zhu, A.; Liu, W. Quantifying inter-regional payments for watershed services on the basis of green ecological spillover value in the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 132, 108–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.; Khanal, S.; Bakshi, B.R. Techno-ecologically synergistic food–energy–water systems can meet human and ecosystem needs. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 3700–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, J.M.; Barber, M.C.; Wolfe, K.; Galvin, M.; Cyterski, M.; Parmar, R. An Integrated Ecological Modeling System for Assessing Impacts of Multiple Stressors on Stream and Riverine Ecosystem Services within River Basins. Ecol Model. 2017, 354, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, Y.; Liu, Y.X.; Wang, C.X. Identification of priority areas for ecological restoration investment in the Yellow River Basin based on water ecosystem services. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 18, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Yan, J.; Chen, C. Research on delineation method of ecological protection red line based on multi-ecological security pattern. Ecol. Sci. 2023, 2, 100–110. [Google Scholar]
- Department of Natural Resources. China’s first red Line Blue book on ecological protection officially released. Resour. Hum. Settl. 2023, 8, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, G. Uncovering the willingness to pay for ecological red lines protection: Evidence from China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 134, 108–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.J.; Su, N.H.; Ma, X.H. Problems and Countermeasures of Water ecological Protection in the lower Yellow River. In Proceedings of the 2022–2023 National Typical Flood and Drought Process Technical Experience Exchange Conference, Ningbo, China, 9–10 October 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.Q. The water source protection work thinking and outlook of south-to-north water transfer project. J. Water Conserv. Shaanxi Prov. 2024, 8, 91–93. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, K.J.; Wang, C.L.; Li, D.H.; Yuan, H.; Li, W.H.; Hong, M. The concept, delineation method and empirical study of water ecological spatial red line. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 39, 5911–5921. [Google Scholar]
- Bartram, J.; Thyssen, N.; Gowers, A. Water and health in Europe. A joint report from the European Environment Agency and the WHO Regional Office for Europe. WHO Reg. Publ. Eur. Ser. 2002, 93, 1–222. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, N.D.; Yang, Y.; Liu, D.X. Foreign water ecosystem service value assessment of relevant practice. J. Water Conserv. Dev. Res. 2023, 23, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
- Melack, J.M.; Coe, M.T. Amazon floodplain hydrology and implications for aquatic conservation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2021, 35, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, Z.D.M.; Jing, L.; Maksym, G.; Chepeliev, T.W. Hertel US climate policy yields water quality cobenefits in the Mississippi Basin and Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2023, 120, e2302087120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islar, M.B. Political ecology of inter-basin water transfers in Turkish water governance. Ecol. Soc. 2014, 19, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carvalho, L.; Mackay, E.B.; Cardoso, A.C.; Baattrup-Pedersen, A.; Solheim, A.L. Protecting and restoring Europe’s waters: An analysis of the future development needs of the Water Framework Directive. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 658, 1228–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Itangishaka, A.C.; Yang, Y.; Manevski, K. Advances in Quantifying Impact and Extent of Water-Land-Food Nexus for Food Security in Africa. Agric. Sci. 2022, 13, 520–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, H. Application of the MaxEnt model in improving the accuracy of ecological red line identification: A case study of Zhanjiang, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 137, 108–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; He, J.H.; Qu, S.; Huang, J.L.; Li, Y.H. A method of delimiting urban ecological red line protection area based on Bayesian network. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 26–53. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, F.Y.; Yu, L.A.N.; Wang, P.B.; Liang, R.M.; Feng, H.; Quan, Z.S. Study of Ecologiscl Red-Line Zonrs in GuiZhou ChiShui River Basin. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2015, 42, 65–75. [Google Scholar]
- Karami, H. Groundwater hydrogeochemical assessment using advanced spatial statistics methods: A case study of Tehran-Karaj plain aquifer, Iran. Arab. J. Geosci. 2020, 13, 156–172. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L.; Yan, Z.; Li, Q.; Xu, Y. Flash Flood Risk Assessment and Driving Factors: A Case Study of the Yantanxi River Basin, Southeastern China. Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci. Engl. Ed. 2022, 13, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gelan, Y.; Jingan, S.; Yue, G.; Dang, Y.; Xu, X. Study of Land Use Change and Eco-environmental Response in the Core Area of Mid-route of South-to-north Water Transfer Project. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2017, 59, 100–120. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, R.; Zou, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, Z.; Ma, S. Algal bloom prediction influenced by the Water Transfer Project in the Middle-lower Hanjiang River. Ecol. Model. 2022, 463, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lou, B.F. Ecological evaluation method to explore water—In the middle and lower reaches of hanjiang river, for example. People Yangtze River 2023, 1, 24–36. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, Y.Q.; Zhang, Y. Study on the coupling and coordinated development of traffic condition, regional economy and ecological environment in Han River Ecological Economic Zone. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2012, 31, 2404–2415. [Google Scholar]
- Song, X.; Zhuang, Y.; Li, E.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Adaptive regulation based on the spatio-temporal distribution of ecological flow surplus and deficit in the Hanjiang River basin. Ecohydrology 2022, 356, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, X.P.; Wu, T.; Yu, Y.Y. Runoff scenario prediction of upper Hanjiang River basin based on SWAT model. Remote Sens. Land Resour. 2021, 33, 174–182. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, X.F.; Yan, E.C.; Wu, X.C.; Yi, J.M.; He, P.T. Reaearch on Shear Strength Characteristics of Slope Rock Mass on Project of Water Diversion from Han to Wei River Project. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2014, 33, 3589–3594. [Google Scholar]
- Long, J.; Duan, Q.; Cao, R.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, L. Development and application of water pressure test device for tunnel surrounding rock of the water diversion from the Han to the Wei River. Shanxi Archit. 2017, 25, 568–579. [Google Scholar]
- Wan, X.; Wang, R.; Wang, M.; Deng, J.; Zhou, Z.; Yi, X.; Pan, J.; Du, Y. Online Public Opinion Mining for Large Cross-Regional Projects: Case Study of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. J. Manag. Eng. 2022, 1, 38. [Google Scholar]
- Ayele, M.A.; Lohani, T.K.; Mirani, K.B. Simulating sediment yield by SWAT and optimizing the parameters using SUFI-2 in Bilate river of Lake Abaya in Ethiopia. World J. Eng. 2023, 20, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaikh, M.M.; Lodha, P.P.; Eslamian, S. Automatic calibration of SWAT hydrological model by SUFI-2 algorithm. Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Technol. 2022, 13, 324–335. [Google Scholar]
- Aloui, S.; Mazzoni, A.; Elomri, A. A review of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) studies of Mediterranean catchments: Applications, feasibility, and future directions. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326 Pt B, 116799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jouma, N.; Dadaser-Celik, F. Assessing hydrologic alterations due to reservoirs and intensified irrigation in a semi-arid agricultural river basin using SWAT. Irrig. Drain. 2022, 71, 452–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, P.V.; Shaikh, M.Z.M.; Lodha, P.P. Assessing hydrological and water quality parameters in the Hathmati Watershed using the SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool). Water Pract. Technol. 2023, 18, 2483–2494. [Google Scholar]
- Natumanya, E.; Ribeiro, N.; Mwanjalolo, M.J.G.; Steinbruch, F. Using SWAT Model and Field Data to Determine Potential of NASA-POWER Data for Modelling Rainfall-Runoff in Incalaue River Basin. Comput. Water Energy Environ. Eng. 2022, 11, 65–83. [Google Scholar]
- Aznarez, C.; Jimeno-Sáez, P.; López-Ballesteros, A.; Pacheco, J.P.; Senent-Aparicio, J. Analysing the Impact of Climate Change on Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Laguna del Sauce (Uruguay) Using the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, L.L.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.L. Analysis of supply and demand matching of rain and waterlogging disasters and block planning intervention based on ecohydrological regulation services in Shijiazhuang. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2024, 44, 5828–5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, W.T.; Deng, H.B.; Li, R.N.; Zheng, H. Spatial patterns of ecosystem hydrological regulation services and factors affecting them in the Yangtze River Basin: Sub-watershed scale analysis. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 412–420. [Google Scholar]
- Meerveld, H.; Jones, J.; Ghimire, C.P.; Zwartendijk, B.W.; Lahitiana, J.; Ravelona, M.; Mulligan, M. Forest regeneration can positively contribute to local hydrological ecosystem services: Implications for forest landscape restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 58, 755–765. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Zheng, L.F.; Ren, C.P. The applicability of the SWAT model in Qi + river basin to explore. Water Electr. Energy Sci. 2024, 9, 10+21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, K.F.; Li, J.; Ma, X.P.; Deng, C.H. The Effects of Land-Use and Climatic Changes on the Hydrological Environment in the Qinling Mountains of Shaanxi Province. Forests 2022, 13, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.J.; Men, B.H.; Shen, Y.D. Soil conservation and water purification services in the Luanhe River Basin, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 5740–5752. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, D.Y.; Sun, X.Y.; Shan, R.F. Spatial and temporal evolution of water purification services in Nansi Lake Basin in recent 45 years and its influencing factors. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2023, 33, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.Q.; Zhang, Q.R.; Zhang, R.Q. Guangdong pearl river watershed landscape pattern’s influence on the water quality purification services. J. Ecol. Environ. 2022, 31, 1425–1433. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.L.; Lin, J.Y.; Huang, J.L. Southeast fujian under water stress in freshwater ecosystems service flow study. J. Ecol. Rural Environ. 2022, 38, 1051–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, Y.L.; Hu, N. Theory of ecosystem services and practice of ecological red line in territorial space. Int. Urban Plan. 2023, 38, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Data | Data Source | Data Attribute |
---|---|---|
DEM (Digital Elevation Model) | China geospatial data cloud (https://www.gscloud.cn/) | Raster data; The spatial resolution is 90 m × 90 m |
Soil type and soil attribute data | World soil database (HWSD) | Raster data; Spatial resolution 1000 m × 1000 m; Archive |
LUCC data for 2015 | Data Center for Resources and Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences | Raster data; Spatial resolution is 30 m; Data sheet |
Meteorological data (temperature, precipitation and wind speed) | National Center for Meteorological Data Science (http://data.cma.cn/) | Daily meteorological data (unit: °C, mm, m/s) |
ID | Parameter Name | Parameter Definition | Min | Max | Rating Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | r__CN2.mgt | Runoff curve | −0.2 | 0.2 | −0.08 |
2 | v__ALPHA_BF.gw | Base flow regression coefficient | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 |
4 | v__GWQMN.gw | Basal flow level threshold | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
5 | v__CH_N2.rte | Manning coefficient of main channel | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.19 |
6 | v__CH_K2.rte | Effective water conductivity of the main channel | 0 | 3500 | 2000 |
7 | SURLAG | Lag coefficient of surface runoff | −0.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 |
8 | LAT_TTIME | Running time of soil flow | 0 | 100 | 5 |
Rate Periodicity | Validation Period | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
p-Factor | r-Factor | R2 | NS | p-Factor | r-Factor | R2 | NS | |
TN (total nitrogen) | ||||||||
Nanliudu | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
Laojunguan | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
Liejinba | 0.60 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.66 |
Xiaogangqiao | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
TP (total phosphorus) | ||||||||
Nanliudu | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
Laojunguan | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 0.86 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 0.74 |
Liejinba | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.80 | 0.77 |
Xiaogangqiao | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 0.69 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ma, X.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Xu, X. Water Ecological Security Pattern Based on Hydrological Regulation Service: A Case Study of the Upper Hanjiang River. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187913
Ma X, Li J, Yu Y, Xu X. Water Ecological Security Pattern Based on Hydrological Regulation Service: A Case Study of the Upper Hanjiang River. Sustainability. 2024; 16(18):7913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187913
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Xinping, Jing Li, Yuyang Yu, and Xiaoting Xu. 2024. "Water Ecological Security Pattern Based on Hydrological Regulation Service: A Case Study of the Upper Hanjiang River" Sustainability 16, no. 18: 7913. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16187913