The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Region and Data
2.1. Study Region
2.2. The Classification of Data and Land Use
3. Methods
3.1. An Analysis of Land-Use Change
3.2. ESV Assessment
- ESV equivalence factor and ESV coefficient
- Calculation of ESV
- Ecological contribution rate
- Calculating elasticity of ESV
- Analysis of the value flow of ecosystem services
- Analysis of sensitivity
4. Results
4.1. The Characteristics of Land-Use Change
4.1.1. Land-Use Structure Change
4.1.2. The Single Dynamic Index of Land-Use
4.1.3. The Characteristics of Land-Use Transitions
4.2. Changes in ESV
4.2.1. The Change in Total ESV
4.2.2. The Changes in Individual ESVs
4.2.3. The Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of ESV
4.3. The Impact of Land-Use Change on ESVs
4.3.1. An Analysis of Contribution Factors
4.3.2. An Analysis of Sensitivity
5. Discussion
5.1. The Driving Mechanism of Land-Use Change
5.2. The Dynamic Response of ESV to Land-Use Change
5.3. Future Land Policy Formulation
5.4. Future Research Opportunities and Study Constraints
6. Conclusions
- The rapid development of urbanization has led to significant changes in land use in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau. The area of cultivated land, forestland, grassland, and wetland has decreased, while the area of water bodies, built-up land, and bare land has increased. In particular, the large-scale expansion of built-up land has occupied vast areas of forestland, grassland, and cultivated land, leading to a significant reduction in the total area of cultivated land, which has a negative impact on agricultural production safety. Moreover, the decrease in cultivated land is also linked to the implementation of the Grain for Green Project. The continuous increase in the number of water bodies can be attributed primarily to the ongoing rise in water conservancy and hydropower projects. In the meantime, the growth of urbanization led to a reduction in the wetland area, whereas alterations in the bare land area were associated with the degradation of grasslands and the spread of stony desertification;
- The forestland has the highest total ecosystem service value, followed by grassland and cultivated land. Climate regulation and hydrological regulation make the greatest contribution to the total ecosystem service value, while water supply is the only ecosystem service type that has a negative impact on the total ecosystem service value, and the negative impact is increasing, which may exacerbate regional water-scarcity issues. Spatially, the ecosystem service value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau is mainly concentrated in the medium-low- to medium-high-value range. The spatial distribution changes of ecosystem service value have shown a trend of two-level differentiation due to the development of urbanization and the implementation of ecological engineering projects.
- The elastic response of ecosystem service value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau to land-use change is becoming increasingly sensitive. During the study period, the ecosystem service value of hydrological regulation and biodiversity conservation increased, while the value of other ecosystem services decreased. The total ecosystem service value of the entire Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau decreased by USD 376.21 million, which is closely related to the reduction in forestland, grassland, and cultivated land area, as well as the significant increase in built-up land, particularly with the highest negative ecological contribution rate from built-up land. To enhance the ecosystem service functions of the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, managers need to further strengthen the protection of cultivated land and implement ecological restoration projects, while strictly controlling the expansion of construction land and improving the intensive utilization rate of construction land.
- This study deeply explores the interactive relationship between the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem service value and land-use change in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, providing important ecological indicators for managers to further understand the evolution laws of regional development and the supply and demand of ecosystem services. This enables managers to make rational decisions on land development and utilization between resource development, urban development, and ecosystem service trade-offs, which has a positive role in promoting sustainable urbanization development.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Daily, G.C. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Egoh, B.; Rouget, M.; Reyers, B.; Knight, A.T.; Cowling, R.M.; van Jaarsveld, A.S.; Welz, A. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: A review. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wainger, L.A.; King, D.M.; Mack, R.N.; Price, E.W.; Maslin, T. Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions? Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 978–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lautenbach, S.; Kugel, C.; Lausch, A.; Seppelt, R. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land-use data. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 676–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Abbas, A.; Waseem, M.; Ahmad, R.; Ahmed khan, K.; Zhao, C.Y.; Zhu, J.T. Sensitivity analysis of greenhouse gas emissions at farm level: Case study of grain and cash crops. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 82559–82573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abbas, A.; Zhao, C.Y.; Waseem, M.; Ahmed khan, K.; Ahmad, R. Analysis of energy input–output of farms and assessment of greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of Cotton Growers. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 9, 826838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elahi, E.; Khalid, Z.; Zhang, Z.X. Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture. Appl. Energy 2022, 301, 118459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elahi, E.; Khalid, Z. Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms. Appl. Energy 2022, 326, 119602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- King, R.T. Wildlife and man. N. Y. Conserv. 1966, 20, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
- Helliwell, D.R. Valuation of wild life resources. Reg. Stud. 1969, 3, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, H.; Li, Y.F.; Ouyang, Z.Y.; Luo, Y.C. Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2013, 33, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Zhu, J.Y.; Wu, G.; Zhan, Y.J. Review and prospective applications of demand, supply, and consumption of ecosystem services. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 2489–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tolessa, T.; Senbeta, F.; Kidane, M. The impact of land-use/land cover change on ecosystem services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosyst. Serv. 2017, 23, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arowolo, A.O.; Deng, X.Z.; Olatunji, O.A.; Obayelu, A.E. Assessing changes in the value of ecosystem services in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in Nigeria. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 636, 597–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, J.; Tian, L.; Zhang, Z.M.; Zhao, Y.; Green, S.M.; Quine, T.A.; Liu, H.Y.; Meersmans, J. Distinguishing the impacts of land-use and climate change on ecosystem services in a karst landscape in China. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 46, 101199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, K.F.; Jiang, W.G.; Ling, Z.Y.; Hou, P.; Deng, Y.W. Evaluating the potential impacts of land-use changes on ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios in support of SDG reporting: A case study of the Wuhan urban agglomeration. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 307, 127321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sala, O.E.; Chapin, F.S.; Armesto, J.J.; Berlow, E.; Bloomfield, J.; Dirzo, R.; Huber-Sanwald, E.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jackson, R.B.; Kinzig, A.; et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 2000, 287, 1770–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.C.; Wang, W.L.; Hu, G.Y.; Wei, Z.H. Changes in ecosystem service values in Zoige Plateau, China. J. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 139, 766–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterling, S.M.; Ducharne, A.; Polcher, J. The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, B.J.; Zhang, L.W. Land-use change and ecosystem services: Concepts, methods and progress. Prog. Geogr. 2014, 33, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douglas, I. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Ref. Module Earth Syst. Environ. Sci. 2018, 4, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bren d’Amour, C.; Reitsma, F.; Baiocchi, G.; Barthel, S.; Güneralp, B.; Erb, K.H.; Haberl, H.; Creutzig, F.; Seto, K.C. Future urban land expansion and implications for global crop-lands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 114, 8939–8944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, F.; Yushanjiang, A.; Jing, Y.Q. Assessing and predicting changes of the ecosystem service values based on land-use/cover change in Ebinur Lake Wetland National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 1133–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, M.M.; Li, Z.T.; Wang, Y.F.; Jiao, M.Y.; Li, M.; Xia, B.C. Spatio-temporal changes in ecosystem service value in response to land use/cover changes in the Pearl River Delta. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Msofe, N.K.; Sheng, L.X.; Li, Z.X.; Lyimo, J. Impact of land-use/cover change on ecosystem service values in the Kilombero Valley Floodplain, Southeastern Tanzania. Forests 2020, 11, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.M.; Szabó, G. Impact of land-use and land-cover changes on urban ecosystem service value in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Land 2021, 10, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeLoyde, C.N.M.; Mabee, W.E. Ecosystem service values as an ecological indicator for land management decisions: A case study in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 151, 110344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narducci, J.; Quintas-Soriano, C.; Castro, A.; Som-Castellano, R.; Brandt, J.S. Implications of urban growth and farmland loss for ecosystem services in the western United States. Land Use Policy 2019, 86, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.; Wong, C.P.; Jiang, B.; Hughes, A.C.; Wang, M.; Wang, Q. Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.H.; Gao, X.D.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Wu, P.; Zhao, X.N. Spatiotemporal exploration of ecosystem service, urbanization, and their interactive coercing relationship in the Yellow River Basin over the past 40 years. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 159757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Xu, H.B.; Ma, X.D.; Huang, Y. A two-step spatially explicit optimization approach of integrating ecosystem services (ES) into land use planning (LUP) to generate the optimally sustainable schemes. Land Degrad. Dev. 2023, 34, 2508–2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. System of Environmental Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting. 2021. Available online: https://seea.un.org/introduction-to-ecosystem-accounting (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Costanza, R.; d’Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farber, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 87, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wang, X.Y.; Luo, L.; Ji, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y.C.; Nabil, B. A systematic review on the methods of ecosystem services value assessment. Chin. J. Ecol. 2018, 37, 1233–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.D.; Lu, C.X.; Len, Y.F.; Zheng, D.; Li, S.C. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J. Nat. Resour. 2003, 18, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.D.; Xiao, Y.; Zhen, L.; Lu, C.X. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. J. Eco-Agric. 2005, 13, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhen, L.; Lu, C.X.; Xiao, Y.; Chen, C. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J. Nat. Resour. 2008, 23, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.D.; Zhang, C.X.; Zhang, L.M.; Chen, W.H.; Li, S.M. Value of China’s ecosystem services. J. Nat. Resour. 2015, 30, 1243–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.H. Study on Typical Terrestrial Ecosystem of Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau (I): Typical Forest, Shrub Community Pattern, Maintenance and Process; Beijing Sci. Press: Beijing, China, 2011; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Ran, Y.J.; Lei, D.M.; Liu, L.; Gao, L.P. Impact of land-use change on ecosystem service value in urban agglomeration of central Yunnan Province during 2000–2020. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2021, 41, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.Y.; Sun, M.Y.; Yang, R.J.; Zhang, L. Impact of land-use change on ecosystem service value in Southwest China. J. Environ. Eng. Technol. 2022, 12, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.Y.; Li, P.; Gong, N.B.; Zhao, C.G.; Xu, Y.T.; Meng, Y.X. Evaluation of ecosystem resilience in Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China. Bull. Soil Water Conserv. 2023, 37, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Y.; Zhang, L.; Ma, X.L. Temporal and spatial evolution of coupling coordination of mountainous urbanization and its resource and environment carrying capacity. Res. Environ. Sci. 2022, 35, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.L.; Li, C.F.; Tian, Y.F.; Ma, Y.Q.; Zhu, Z.P. Insight into the construction of a comprehensive observation system of natural resource elements in Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau. Pratacultural Sci. 2022, 39, 2629–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Geng, H.C. Evolution of land use landscape patterns in karst watersheds of Guizhou plateau and its ecological security evaluation. Land 2022, 11, 2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, L.; Yu, H.J.; Sun, M.X.; Wang, Y.T. Coupled impacts of climate and land use changes on regional ecosystem services. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, X.L.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, S.W.; Li, R.D.; Yan, C.Z.; Wu, S.X. China Multi Period Land-Use Remote Sensing Monitoring Dataset; Resource and Environmental Science Data Registration and Publishing System: Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.L. Multi-Period Land-Use and Cover Change Remote Sensing Monitoring Dataset; Resource and Environmental Science Data Registration and Publishing System: Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.L.; Bao, Y.H. Study on the methods of land-use dynamic change research. Prog. Geogr. 1999, 18, 81–87. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Z.; Song, W.; Deng, X. Responses of ecosystem service to land-use change in Qinghai province. Energies 2016, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, P.F.; Zhang, F.F.; Wang, H.Y. The response of ecosystem service value to land use change in the middle and lower Yellow River: A case study of the Henan section. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 144, 109019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, S.H. Dynamic Effects on Ecosystem Services Value with Regional Land-Use Change. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, H.H.; Hu, B.Q.; Zhang, Z. Study on ecosystem service value of Guangxi in the past 20 years based on land-use change. J. Environ. Eng. Technol. 2022, 12, 1455–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.J.; Xu, M.; Cao, C.X.; Singh, R.H.; Chen, W.; Ju, H.R. Land-use/land-cover changes and their influence on the ecosystem in Chengdu city, China during the period of 1992–2018. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.R.; Wang, C.; Yan, L.J. Impacts of land-use change on ecosystem services in the agricultural area of North China Plain: A case study of Shangqiu City, Henan Province, China. J. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2018, 29, 1597–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, L.P.; Yan, D.D.; Li, J.T.; Yao, X.Y.; Xue, Y.Y.; Luan, Z.Q. Dynamics of ecosystem services value in response to land-use/land cover changes in Jiangsu Province. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. 2021, 57, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, W.J.; Liu, D.; Gong, Q.W. Estimation loss of agroecosystem service value in farmland conversion and its provincial difference in 2001–2016. Econ. Geogr. 2019, 39, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Department of Natural Resources of Yunnan Province. Main Data Bulletin of the Third National land Survey in Yunnan Province. 2021. Available online: http://dnr.yn.gov.cn/html/2021/tongjixinxi_1222/32921.html (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Department of Natural Resources of Kweichow Province. Main Data Bulletin of the Third National Land Survey in Kweichow Province. 2021. Available online: https://zrzy.Kweichow.gov.cn/wzgb/zwgk/zdlyxxgk/zrzy/dcjc/202201/t20220121_72378280.html (accessed on 5 June 2023).
- Hu, Z.Y.; Wang, S.J.; Bai, X.Y.; Luo, G.J.; Li, Q.; Wu, L.H.; Yang, Y.J.; Tian, S.Q.; Li, C.J.; Deng, Y.H. Changes in ecosystem service values in karst areas of China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 301, 107026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bureau of Statistics of Yunnan Province. Yunnan Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2021.
- Bureau of Statistics of Kweichow Province. Kweichow Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2021.
- Yang, K.; Gong, H.D. The status of biodiversity conservation in Yunnan Province. J. West Chin. For. Sci. 2021, 50, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, R.D.; Zhang, J.W.; Wu, X.T. Design and study on resettlement planning for Wudongde Hydropower Station. J. Yangtze River. 2014, 45, 106–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, X.Q.; Zhu, M.Q.; Jiang, Z.C. A Review on recent advances in rocky desertification southwest China karst region. Carsol. Sin. 2006, 25, 234–238. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Z.C.; Lou, W.Q.; Tong, L.Q.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, Q.Y.; Wu, Z.Y.; Liang, J.H. Evolution features of rocky desertification and influence factors in karst areas of southwest China in the 21st century. Carsol. Sin. 2016, 35, 461–468. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H.L.; Liu, Y.; Cai, G.P.; Bai, Y.M.; Ma, S.L.; Chen, S.Y.; Luo, R.Y. Characteristics of gradient change of the value of mountain ecosystem services with the rapid urbanization in urban area—A case study of guiyang. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2020, 27, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Q.Y.; Bao, Y.; Wang, Z.T.; Chen, X.T.; Wei, W.F.; Fang, Z.Y. Vulnerability assessment of urban remnant mountain ecosystems based on ecological sensitivity and ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 2023, 151, 110314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, C. The impact of land cover change on ecosystem service values in urban agglomerations along the coast of the Bohai Rim, China. Sustainability 2015, 7, 10365–10387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrés, V.; William, J.M.; Yang, H.; Xu, Z.; Liu, J. Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1500965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frélichová, J.; Fanta, J. Ecosystem service availability in view of long-term land-use changes: A regional case study in the Czech Republic. Ecosyst. Health Sustain. 2016, 1, 11879005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.Y.; Zhang, C.H.; Wang, K.L.; Yue, Y.M.; Qi, X.K.; Fan, F.D. Spatiotemporal variation of karst ecosystem service values and its correlation with environmental factors in Northwest Guangxi, China. Environ. Manag. 2011, 48, 933–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lawler, J.J.; Lewis, D.J.; Nelson, E.; Plantinga, A.J.; Polasky, S.; Withey, J.C.; Helmers, D.P.; Martinuzzi, S.; Pennington, D.; Radeloff, V.C. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 7492–7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fu, B.J.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.B.; Liang, W.; Miao, C.Y. Hydrogeomorphic ecosystem responses to natural and anthropogenic changes in the Loess Plateau of China. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 2017, 45, 223–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryan, B.A.; Gao, L.; Ye, Y.Q.; Sun, X.F.; Connor, J.D.; Crossman, N.D.; Stafford-Smith, M.; Wu, J.G.; He, C.Y.; Yu, D.Y.; et al. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency. Nature 2018, 559, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Zhao, H.; Li, J.; Zhu, L.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, J. Land-use transitions and the associated impacts on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China based on the geo-informatic Tupu method. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 701, 134690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.J.; Yuan, D.X.; Cheng, H.; Yu, T.L.; Shen, C.C.; Edwards, R.L.; Wu, Y.; Xiao, Y.S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; et al. Human activity and climate change triggered the expansion of rocky desertification in the karst areas of Southwestern China. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2021, 64, 1761–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salzman, J.; Bennett, G.; Carroll, N.; Goldstein, A.; Jenkins, M. The global status and trends of payments for ecosystem services. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Service Type | Sub-Type | CL | FS | GS | WB | WL | BU | BL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provisioning services | FP | 0.7017 | 0.1603 | 0.1482 | 0.2540 | 0.3239 | 0.0103 | 0.0032 |
RMP | 0.1556 | 0.3683 | 0.2180 | 0.0730 | 0.3175 | 0.0000 | 0.0095 | |
WS | −0.8287 | 0.1905 | 0.1207 | 3.3179 | 1.6447 | −7.5100 | 0.0064 | |
Regulating services | GR | 0.5652 | 1.2113 | 0.7662 | 0.3016 | 1.2065 | −2.4200 | 0.0413 |
CR | 0.2953 | 3.6243 | 2.0257 | 0.8985 | 2.2860 | 0.0000 | 0.0318 | |
EP | 0.0857 | 1.0620 | 0.6689 | 1.8129 | 2.2860 | −2.4600 | 0.1302 | |
HR | 0.9493 | 2.3717 | 1.4838 | 34.7250 | 15.3861 | 0.0000 | 0.0762 | |
Supporting services | SR | 0.3302 | 1.4748 | 0.9335 | 0.2953 | 1.4669 | 0.0200 | 0.0476 |
MNC | 0.0984 | 0.1127 | 0.0720 | 0.0222 | 0.1143 | 0.0000 | 0.0032 | |
BP | 0.1080 | 1.3430 | 0.8488 | 0.8128 | 4.9975 | 0.3400 | 0.0445 | |
Cultural services | AL | 0.0476 | 0.5890 | 0.3747 | 0.6287 | 3.0036 | 0.0100 | 0.0191 |
Service Type | Sub-Type | CL | FS | GS | WB | WL | BU | BL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provisioning services | FP | 163.49 | 37.36 | 34.52 | 59.18 | 75.46 | 2.40 | 0.00 |
RMP | 36.25 | 85.81 | 50.80 | 17.02 | 73.98 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
WS | −193.08 | 44.39 | 28.11 | 773.07 | 383.21 | −1749.85 | 0.00 | |
Regulating services | GR | 131.68 | 282.23 | 178.53 | 70.28 | 281.12 | −563.87 | 4.66 |
CR | 68.80 | 844.46 | 471.98 | 209.36 | 532.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
EP | 19.97 | 247.46 | 155.85 | 422.42 | 532.64 | −573.19 | 23.30 | |
HR | 221.20 | 552.62 | 345.73 | 8091.00 | 3584.99 | 0.00 | 6.99 | |
Supporting services | SR | 76.94 | 343.63 | 217.50 | 68.80 | 341.78 | 4.66 | 4.66 |
MNC | 22.93 | 26.26 | 16.77 | 5.18 | 26.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
BP | 25.15 | 312.93 | 197.77 | 189.38 | 1164.42 | 79.22 | 4.66 | |
Cultural services | AL | 11.10 | 137.23 | 87.29 | 146.48 | 699.83 | 2.33 | 2.33 |
Total | 584.43 | 2914.37 | 1784.85 | 10,052.17 | 7696.70 | −2798.29 | 46.60 |
Land-Use | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | 1181.71 | 1185.60 | 1180.81 | 1172.65 | 1157.35 |
FS | 3129.26 | 3136.52 | 3115.91 | 3135.98 | 3127.90 |
GS | 1184.22 | 1191.75 | 1192.33 | 1175.93 | 1169.14 |
WB | 39.33 | 30.61 | 40.41 | 41.33 | 48.80 |
WL | 1.95 | 2.41 | 1.98 | 1.97 | 1.80 |
BU | 40.59 | 23.18 | 45.00 | 48.68 | 71.56 |
BL | 14.80 | 20.51 | 15.38 | 15.28 | 15.25 |
Land Use | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 | Ecological Contribution Rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Million USD | ||||||
CL | 6906.23 | 6929.00 | 6901.01 | 6853.29 | 6763.88 | 6.24 |
FS | 91,198.23 | 91,409.85 | 90,809.40 | 91,394.13 | 91,158.84 | 1.73 |
GS | 21,136.57 | 21,270.97 | 21,281.28 | 20,988.50 | 20,867.38 | 11.80 |
WB | 3953.04 | 3076.47 | 4062.32 | 4154.15 | 4905.72 | 41.74 |
WL | 149.87 | 185.35 | 152.33 | 152.01 | 138.36 | 0.50 |
BU | −1135.82 | −648.52 | −1259.26 | −1362.20 | −2002.45 | 37.97 |
BL | 6.90 | 9.56 | 7.17 | 7.12 | 7.10 | 0.02 |
Total | 122,215.03 | 122,232.68 | 121,954.25 | 122,187.01 | 121,838.82 | / |
Service Type | Sub-Type | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Provisioning services | FP | 3535.60 | 3542.06 | 3532.73 | 3521.84 | 3496.31 |
RMP | 3723.42 | 3733.75 | 3715.98 | 3722.06 | 3707.27 | |
WS | −958.58 | −721.69 | −1029.16 | −1066.42 | −1385.62 | |
Regulating services | GR | 12,306.87 | 12,439.56 | 12,258.52 | 12,254.99 | 12,075.68 |
CR | 32,920.40 | 33,004.14 | 32,847.83 | 32,936.11 | 32,840.09 | |
EP | 9772.47 | 9869.72 | 9731.53 | 9736.71 | 9602.58 | |
HR | 27,253.51 | 26,639.65 | 27,294.97 | 27,404.83 | 27,901.49 | |
Supporting services | SR | 14,274.14 | 14,313.50 | 14,246.33 | 14,274.09 | 14,225.42 |
MNC | 1293.95 | 1297.68 | 1291.66 | 1292.36 | 1285.93 | |
BP | 12,561.57 | 12,575.48 | 12,541.58 | 12,574.46 | 12,562.14 | |
Cultural services | AL | 5531.68 | 5538.83 | 5522.28 | 5535.98 | 5527.52 |
ESV Level | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | |||
Area (103 ha) | Proportion | Area (103 ha) | Proportion | Area (103 ha) | Proportion | |
Low value | 2585.98 | 4.63% | 2305.56 | 4.13% | 2663.31 | 4.77% |
Medium-high value | 13,467.06 | 24.10% | 13,584.16 | 24.31% | 13,648.13 | 24.42% |
Medium value | 22,484.17 | 40.23% | 23,292.40 | 41.68% | 22,410.99 | 40.10% |
Medium-high value | 17,166.10 | 30.71% | 16,500.84 | 29.53% | 16,981.87 | 30.38% |
High value | 186.38 | 0.33% | 200.42 | 0.36% | 185.21 | 0.33% |
ESV Level | 2010 | 2020 | Area of Change | |||
Area (103 ha) | Proportion | Area (103 ha) | Proportion | 1980–2020 (103 ha) | ||
Low value | 2664.52 | 4.77% | 3135.30 | 5.61% | 549.32 | |
Medium-low value | 13,403.74 | 23.98% | 13,601.68 | 24.34% | 134.63 | |
Medium value | 22,397.07 | 40.07% | 21,420.85 | 38.33% | −1063.31 | |
Medium-high value | 17,240.25 | 30.85% | 17,537.68 | 31.38% | 371.58 | |
High value | 183.76 | 0.33% | 193.73 | 0.35% | 7.35 |
Sub-Service Type | 1980–2020 (ΔESV) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL | FS | GS | WB | WL | BU | BL | Total | |
FP | −39.82 | −0.51 | −5.21 | 5.61 | −0.11 | 0.74 | 0.00 | −39.29 |
RMP | −8.83 | −1.16 | −7.66 | 1.61 | −0.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 | −16.14 |
WS | 47.03 | −0.60 | −4.24 | 73.27 | −0.57 | −541.93 | 0.01 | −427.04 |
GR | −32.08 | −3.82 | −26.93 | 6.66 | −0.42 | −174.63 | 0.04 | −231.17 |
CR | −16.76 | −11.42 | −71.18 | 19.84 | −0.80 | 0.00 | 0.03 | −80.28 |
EP | −4.87 | −3.35 | −23.50 | 40.03 | −0.80 | −177.52 | 0.13 | −169.86 |
HR | −53.88 | −7.47 | −52.14 | 766.81 | −5.36 | 0.00 | 0.08 | 648.04 |
SR | −18.74 | −4.65 | −32.80 | 6.52 | −0.51 | 1.44 | 0.05 | −48.69 |
MNC | −5.59 | −0.36 | −2.53 | 0.49 | −0.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −8.02 |
BP | −6.13 | −4.23 | −29.83 | 17.95 | −1.74 | 24.54 | 0.05 | 0.60 |
AL | −2.70 | −1.86 | −13.17 | 13.88 | −1.05 | 0.72 | 0.02 | −4.15 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, C.; Li, J.; Jiang, S.; Tian, Y.; Li, C.; Yang, W.; Duan, H.; Wei, Z.; Huang, Y. The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031062
Yang C, Li J, Jiang S, Tian Y, Li C, Yang W, Duan H, Wei Z, Huang Y. The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China. Sustainability. 2024; 16(3):1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031062
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Chaolei, Jingyuan Li, Shuwen Jiang, Yufeng Tian, Canfeng Li, Wantao Yang, Haichuan Duan, Zong Wei, and Yong Huang. 2024. "The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China" Sustainability 16, no. 3: 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031062
APA StyleYang, C., Li, J., Jiang, S., Tian, Y., Li, C., Yang, W., Duan, H., Wei, Z., & Huang, Y. (2024). The Impacts of Land-Use Changes on Ecosystem Service Value in the Yunnan–Kweichow Plateau, China. Sustainability, 16(3), 1062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031062