The Role of Big Five Personality Traits, Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Need Frustration in Predicting Athletes’ Organic Self-Talk
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Organic Self-Talk
- To examine whether (a) the Big Five personality traits as personal antecedents and (b) athletes’ BPNs satisfaction and frustration within their sport environment as social–environmental antecedents would predict athletes’ spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk. More specifically, we are interested in analyzing the incremental contribution of BPNs satisfaction and frustration to the prediction of athletes’ spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk over and above athletes’ Big Five personality traits and BPNs satisfaction, respectively.
- To provide evidence regarding the nomological validity of OSTQS (i.e., the extent to which the construct assessed by the scale relates to other concepts such as antecedents or consequences, based on existing theory or a theoretical model [32]) by a detailed examination of the relationships between athletes’ spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk and their antecedents, that is, the variables of the Big Five personality traits, BPNs satisfaction, and BPNs frustration.
1.2. Personality and Athletes’ Organic Self-Talk
1.3. BPNs Satisfaction, Frustration, and Athletes’ Organic Self-Talk
- To examine whether (a) the Big Five personality traits as personal antecedents and (b) athletes’ BPNs satisfaction and frustration within their sport environment as social–environmental antecedents would predict athletes’ spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk. More specifically, we are interested in analyzing the incremental contribution of BPNs satisfaction and frustration to the prediction of athletes’ spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk, over and above athletes’ Big Five personality traits and BPNs satisfaction, respectively.
- To provide evidence regarding the nomological validity of OSTQS (i.e., the degree to which the construct assessed by the scale relates to other concepts such as its antecedents or its consequences, according to an existing theory or a theoretical model [32]) by a detailed examination of the relationships between athletes’ spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk with their antecedents, and particularly the variables of the Big Five personality traits, BPNs satisfaction, and BPNs frustration.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design
2.2. Participants
2.3. Measures
2.4. Procedure
2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Descriptive Statistics, Reliabilities, and Correlations
3.2. Nomological Validity of OSTQS
3.3. Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Predicting Athletes’ Spontaneous Self-Talk Dimensions
3.4. Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Predicting Athletes’ Goal-Directed Self-Talk Functions
4. Discussion
- Investigate the nomological validity of the OSTQS through a detailed examination of the Pearson’s correlations between the OSTQS subscales, and the subscales of the Big Five personality traits, BPNs satisfaction, and BPNs frustration.
- To examine three unexplored, potential antecedents of athletes’ organic, spontaneous and goal-directed self-talk in a state level, and particularly: (a) the big five personality traits as personal antecedents, and (b) athletes’ BPNs satisfaction and (c) BPNs frustration within their sport environment as social–environmental antecedents.
4.1. Nomological Validity of OSTQS
4.2. Big Five Personality Traits as Antecedents of Athletes’ Organic, Spontaneous and Goal-Directed Self-Talk
4.3. BPNs Satisfaction and Frustration as Antecedents of Athletes’ Organic, Spontaneous and Goal-Directed Self-Talk
4.4. Practical Implications, Limitations, and Future Research Directions
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Latinjak, A.T.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Comoutos, N.; Hardy, J. Speaking clearly … 10 years on: The case for an integrative perspective of self-talk in sport. Sport Exerc. Perform. Psychol. 2019, 8, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zourbanos, N.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Chroni, S.; Theodorakis, Y.; Papaioannou, A. Automatic Self-Talk Questionnaire for Sports (ASTQS): Development and preliminary validity of a measure identifying the structure of athletes’ self-talk. Sport Psychol. 2009, 23, 233–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Raalte, J.L.; Vincent, A.; Brewer, B.W. Self-talk: Review and sport-specific model. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2016, 22, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theodorakis, Y.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Zourbanos, N. Cognitions: Self-talk and performance. In The Oxford Handbook of Sport and Performance Psychology; Murphy, S., Ed.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 191–212. ISBN 9780199971206. [Google Scholar]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Hardy, J.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A. Pieces of the self-talk jigsaw puzzle: An introduction. In Self-Talk in Sport, 1st ed.; Latinjak, A.T., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 11–27. ISBN 9780429460623. [Google Scholar]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Zourbanos, N.; López-Ros, V.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A. Goal-directed and undirected self-talk: Exploring a new perspective for the study of athletes’ self-talk. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2014, 15, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Zourbanos, N. Goal-directed and spontaneous self-talk in anger- and anxiety-eliciting sport-situations. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2017, 29, 150–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Torregrossa, M.; Comoutos, N.; Hernando-Gimeno, C.; Ramis, Y. Goal-directed self-talk used to self-regulate in male basketball competitions. J. Sports Sci. 2019, 37, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Masó, M.; Calmeiro, L.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A. Athletes’ use of goal-directed self-talk: Situational determinants and functions. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2020, 18, 733–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karamitrou, A.; Comoutos, N.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Theodorakis, Y. A self-determination approach to understanding of athletes’ automatic self-talk. Sport Exerc. Perform. Psychol. 2017, 6, 340–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karamitrou, A.; Galanis, E.; Theodorakis, Y.; Comoutos, N. Organic self-talk antecedents: An interpretative review and implications for practice. In Self-Talk in Sport, 1st ed.; Latinjak, A.T., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2020; pp. 77–90. ISBN 9780429460623. [Google Scholar]
- Tod, D.; Hardy, J.; Oliver, E. Effects of self-talk: A systematic review. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2011, 33, 666–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hardy, J.; Oliver, E.; Tod, D. A framework for the study and application of self-talk in sport. In Advances in Applied Sport Psychology: A Review, 1st ed.; Mellalieu, S.D., Hanton, S., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2009; pp. 37–74. ISBN 9780203887073. [Google Scholar]
- Conroy, D.E.; Metzler, J.N. Patterns of self-talk associated with different forms of competitive anxiety. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2004, 26, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zourbanos, N.; Theodorakis, Y.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A. Coaches’ behavior, social support, and athletes’ self-talk. Hell. J. Psychol. 2006, 3, 117–133. [Google Scholar]
- Zourbanos, N.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Theodorakis, Y. A preliminary investigation of the relationship between athletes’ self-talk and coaches’ behavior and statements. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2007, 2, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zourbanos, N.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Tsiakaras, N.; Chroni, S.; Theodorakis, Y. A multimethod examination of the relationship between coaching behavior and athletes’ inherent self-talk. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2010, 32, 764–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zourbanos, N.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Goudas, M.; Papaioannou, A.; Chroni, S.; Theodorakis, Y. The social side of self-talk: Relationships between perceptions of support received from the coach and athletes’ self- talk. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2011, 12, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harwood, C.; Cumming, J.; Fletcher, D. Motivational profiles and psychological skills usage within elite youth sport. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2004, 16, 318–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van de Pol, P.K.; Kavussanu, M. Achievement goals and motivational responses in tennis: Does the context matter? Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2011, 12, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thibodeaux, J.; Winsler, A. Stay positive: Self-talk in relation to motivational climate, goal orientation, and self-talk encouragement in tennis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 2022, 93, 769–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Van Raalte, J.L.; Brewer, B.W.; Rivera, P.M.; Petitpas, A.J. The relationship between observable self-talk and competitive junior tennis players’ match performances. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 1994, 16, 400–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perry, C., Jr.; Marsh, H. Listening to self-talk, hearing self-concept. In Doing Sport Psychology, 1st ed.; Andersen, M.B., Ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2000; pp. 61–76. ISBN 10 0736000860. [Google Scholar]
- Van Raalte, J.L.; Cornelius, A.E.; Brewer, B.W.; Hatten, S.J. The antecedents and consequences of self-talk in competitive tennis. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2000, 22, 345–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Masó, M.; Comoutos, N. Goal-directed self-talk used during technical skill acquisition: The case of novice ultimate frisbee players. Sport Psychol. 2018, 32, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Biddle, S.J.H. Negative self-talk during sport performance: Relationships with pre-competition anxiety and goal-performance discrepancies. J. Sport Behav. 2008, 31, 237–253. [Google Scholar]
- Santos-Rosa, F.J.; Montero-Carretero, C.; Gómez-Landero, L.A.; Torregrossa, M.; Cervelló, E. Positive and negative spontaneous self-talk and performance in gymnastics: The role of contextual, personal and situational factors. PLoS ONE. 2022, 17, e0265809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hardy, J.; Hall, C.R.; Hardy, L. Quantifying athlete self-talk. J. Sports Sci. 2005, 23, 905–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Latinjak, A.T.; Corbalan-Frigola, J.; Alcoy-Fabregas, P.A.U.; Barker, J.B. Spontaneous self-talk: An insight into the cognitive component of emotions in sport. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 2020, 51, 28–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zourbanos, N.; Haznadar, A.; Papaioannou, A.; Tzioumakis, Y.; Krommidas, C.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A. The relationships between athletes’ perceptions of coach-created motivational climate, self-talk, and self-efficacy in youth soccer. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2016, 28, 97–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karamitrou, A.; Comoutos, N.; Brisimis, E.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Krommydas, C.; Galanis, E.; Loules, G.; Tzioumakis, Y.; Papaioannou, A.; Goudas, M.; et al. Organic Self-Talk Questionnaire for Sport: Development and validation of a theory-based, state measure of athletes’ organic self-talk. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2023. submitted for publication. [Google Scholar]
- Castleberry, S.B.; Shepherd, C.D.; Ridnour, R. Effective interpersonal listening in the personal selling environment: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 1999, 7, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cervone, D.; Pervin, L.A. Personality: Theory and Research, 11th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 10:047048506X. [Google Scholar]
- Costa, P.T.; McCrae, R.R. Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Professional Manual; Psychological Assessment Resources: Odessa, FL, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- McCrae, R.R.; Costa, P.T. Personality in Adulthood: A Five Factor Theory Perspective, 2nd ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Lazarus, R.S.; Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Lazarus, R.S. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Stanisławski, K. The coping circumplex model: An integrative model of the structure of coping with stress. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiseler, M.; Polman, R.C.J.; Nicholls, A.R. Effects of the big five personality dimensions on appraisal coping, and coping effectiveness in sport. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2012, 12, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eysenck, M. Trait anxiety and stress. In Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health; Fisher, S., Reason, J., Eds.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1988; pp. 476–482. [Google Scholar]
- Gunthert, K.C.; Cohen, L.H.; Armeli, S. The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1999, 77, 1087–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Semmer, S.K. Personality, stress, and coping. In Handbook of Personality and Health; Vollrath, M.E., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2006; pp. 73–113. [Google Scholar]
- Allen, M.S.; Greenlees, I.; Jones, M. An investigation of the five-factor model of personality and coping behaviour in sport. J. Sports Sci. 2011, 29, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, M.S.; Frings, D.; Hunter, S. Personality, coping, and challenge and threat states in athletes. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2012, 10, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiseler, M.; Levy, A.; Nicholls, A.R.; Madigan, D.J. The independent and interactive effects of the Big-Five personality dimensions upon dispositional coping and coping effectiveness in sport. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2019, 17, 410–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1985; Volume 39. [Google Scholar]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 2000, 11, 227–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brisimis, E. The Content and the Factors that Influence Students’ Self-Talk in the Physical Education Course. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, E.J.; Markland, D.; Hardy, J.; Petherick, C.M. The effects of autonomy-supportive and controlling environments on self-talk. Motiv. Emot. 2008, 32, 200–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, E.J.; Markland, D.; Hardy, J. Interpretation of self-talk and post-lecture affective states of higher education students: A self determination theory perspective. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 80, 307–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryan, E.; Deci, E. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 61, 101860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vansteenkiste, M.; Ryan, R.M. On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. J. Psychother. Integr. 2013, 23, 263–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vansteenkiste, M.; Ryan, R.M.; Soenens, B. Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motiv. Emot. 2020, 44, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartholomew, K.J.; Ntoumanis, N.; Ryan, R.M.; Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2011, 33, 75–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartholomew, K.J.; Ntoumanis, N.; Ryan, R.M.; Bosch, J.A.; Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. Self-Determination Theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2011, 37, 1459–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, B.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Beyers, W.; Boone, L.; Deci, E.L.; Van der Kaap-Deeder, J.; Duriez, B.; Lens, W.; Matos, L.; Mouratidis, A.; et al. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motiv. Emot. 2015, 39, 216–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Soenens, B. Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motiv. Sci. 2021, 7, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adie, J.W.; Duda, J.L.; Ntoumanis, N. Autonomy support, basic need satisfaction, and the optimal functioning of adult male and female sport participants: A test of basic needs theory. Motiv. Emot. 2008, 32, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gagné, M.; Ryan, R.M.; Bargmann, K. Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2003, 15, 372–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarrazin, P.; Vallerand, R.J.; Guillet, E.; Pelletier, L.; Cury, F. Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21 month prospective study. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 2002, 32, 395–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ntoumanis, N.; Standage, M. Morality in sport: A self-determination theory perspective. J. Appl. Sport Psychol. 2009, 21, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mack, D.E.; Wilson, P.M.; Oster, K.G.; Kowalski, K.C.; Crocker, P.R.E.; Sylvester, B.D. Well-being in volleyball players: Examining the contributions of independent and balanced psychological need satisfaction. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2011, 12, 533–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reinboth, M.; Duda, J.L.; Ntoumanis, N. Dimensions of coaching behavior, need satisfaction, and the psychological and physical welfare of young athletes. Motiv. Emot. 2004, 28, 297–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, I.M.; Bruner, M.W. The social environment and developmental experiences in elite youth soccer. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2012, 13, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quested, E.; Ntoumanis, N.; Viladrich, C.; Haug, E.; Ommundsen, Y.; Van Hoye, A.; Mercé, J.; Hall, H.K.; Zourbanos, N.; Duda, J.L. Intentions to drop-out of youth soccer: A test of the basic needs theory among European youth from five countries. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 11, 395–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lonsdale, C.; Hodge, K.; Rose, E. Athlete burnout in elite sport: A self-determination perspective. J. Sports Sci. 2009, 27, 785–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Quested, E.; Duda, J.L. Exploring the social-environmental determinants of well- and ill-being in dancers: A test of basic needs theory. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2010, 32, 39–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balaguer, I.; González, L.; Fabra, P.; Castillo, I.; Mercé, J.; Duda, J.L. Coaches’ interpersonal style, basic psychological needs and the well- and ill-being of young soccer players: A longitudinal analysis. J. Sports Sci. 2012, 30, 1619–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldberg, L.R. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Personality Psychology in Europe; Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., Ostendorf, F., Eds.; Tilburg University Press: Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 7, pp. 7–28. [Google Scholar]
- Ypofanti, M. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Smoking Cessation: The Role of Personality Traits and Physical Activity. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Standage, M.; Duda, J.L.; Ntoumanis, N. A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. J. Educ. Psychol. 2003, 95, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAuley, E.; Duncan, T.; Tammen, V.V. Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport. 1989, 60, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richer, S.; Vallerand, R.J. Construction and validation of the perceived relatedness scale. Rev. Eur. Psychol. Appl. 1998, 48, 129–137. [Google Scholar]
- Ntoumanis, N.; Quested, E.; Patterson, L.; Kaffe, S.; Backhouse, S.H.; Pavlidis, G.; Whitaker, L.; Barkoukis, V.; Smith, B.J.; Staff, H.R.; et al. An intervention to optimise coach-created motivational climates and reduce athlete willingness to dope (CoachMADE): A three-country cluster randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Sports Med. 2021, 55, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992, 112, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Čopec, D.; Karlović Vragolov, M.; Buško, V. Individual dispositions and situational stressors in competitive sport: The role of stress mindset in the cognitive appraisals processes. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 829053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zautra, A.J.; Affleck, G.G.; Tennen, H.; Reich, J.W.; Davis, M.C. Dynamic approaches to emotions and stress in everyday life: Bolger and Zuckerman reloaded with positive as well as negative affects. J. Pers. 2005, 73, 1511–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barańczuk, U. The five factor model of personality and emotion regulation: A metaanalysis. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2019, 139, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zourbanos, N.; Papaioannou, A.; Argyropoulou, E.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A. Achievement goals and self-talk in physical education: The moderating role of perceived competence. Motiv. Emot. 2014, 38, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zinsser, N.; Bunker, L.; Williams, J.M. Cognitive techniques for building confidence and enhancing performance. In Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance, 4th ed.; Williams, J.M., Ed.; Mayfield Publishing Company: Mountain View, CA, USA, 2001; pp. 284–311. [Google Scholar]
- Chu, T.L. The Roles of Coaches, Peers, and Parents in High School Athletes’ Motivational Processes: A Mixed-Methods Study. Ph.D. Thesis, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Hancox, J.E.; Quested, E.; Ntoumanis, N.; Duda, J.L. Teacher-created social environment, basic psychological needs, and dancers’ affective states during class: A diary study. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2017, 115, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castillo-Jiménez, N.; López-Walle, J.M.; Tomás, I.; Tristán, J.; Duda, J.L.; Balaguer, I. Empowering and disempowering motivational climates, mediating psychological processes, and future intentions of sport participation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duda, J.L. The conceptual and empirical foundations of Empowering Coaching™: Setting the stage for the PAPA project. Int. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2013, 11, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nisbett, R.E.; Wilson, T.D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 231–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerrero, M.C.M. Inner Speech-L2: Thinking Words in a Second Language; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
Subscale | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. E | - | |||||||||||||||||||||
2. A | 0.18 ** | - | ||||||||||||||||||||
3. CO | 0.11 ** | 0.20 ** | - | |||||||||||||||||||
4. ES | 0.15 ** | −0.05 | 0.16 ** | - | ||||||||||||||||||
5. IN | 0.39 ** | 0.24 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.04 | - | |||||||||||||||||
6. RP | 0.32 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.08 * | 0.25 ** | - | ||||||||||||||||
7. AP | 0.32 ** | 0.18 ** | 0.21 ** | 0.17 ** | 0.25 ** | 0.58 ** | - | |||||||||||||||
8. RN | −0.22 ** | −0.01 | −0.14 ** | −0.40 ** | −0.09 * | −0.30 ** | −0.33 ** | - | ||||||||||||||
9. AN | −0.14 ** | −0.01 | −0.13 ** | −0.32 ** | −0.06 | −0.23 ** | −0.25 ** | 0.45 ** | - | |||||||||||||
10. CCR | 0.03 | 0.19 ** | 0.05 | −0.13 ** | 0.08 * | 0.26 ** | 0.08 | 0.13 ** | 0.14 ** | - | ||||||||||||
11. CDS | 0.11 ** | 0.25 ** | 0.14 ** | −0.15 ** | 0.21 ** | 0.31 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.09 * | 0.08 * | 0.48 ** | - | |||||||||||
12. CFDS | 0.05 | 0.24 ** | 0.12 ** | −0.25 ** | 0.17 ** | 0.21 ** | 0.26 ** | 0.14 ** | 0.11 ** | 0.40 ** | 0.67 ** | - | ||||||||||
13. CFAS | 0.23 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.20 ** | −0.01 | 0.17 ** | 0.41 ** | 0.50 ** | −0.04 | −0.06 | 0.24 ** | 0.53 ** | 0.48 ** | - | |||||||||
14. I | 0.17 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.23 ** | −0.10 * | 0.18 ** | 0.34 ** | 0.37 ** | 0.02 | −0.08 * | 0.34 ** | 0.56 ** | 0.52 ** | 0.66 ** | - | ||||||||
15. C | 0.27 ** | 0.20 ** | 0.25 ** | −0.01 | 0.25 ** | 0.50 ** | 0.62 ** | −0.14 ** | −0.11 ** | 0.33 ** | 0.60 ** | 0.46 ** | 0.72 ** | 0.62 ** | - | |||||||
16. PG | 0.24 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.26 ** | −0.01 | 0.18 ** | 0.42 ** | 0.45 ** | −0.02 | −0.17 ** | 0.32 ** | 0.46 ** | 0.38 ** | 0.60 ** | 0.61 ** | 0.64 ** | - | ||||||
17. AS | 0.12 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.10 ** | 0.01 | 0.17 ** | 0.20 ** | 0.13 ** | −0.14 ** | −0.01 | 0.13 ** | 0.14 ** | 0.10 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.18 ** | 0.10 ** | - | |||||
18. CS. | 0.29 ** | 0.19 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.03 | 0.30 ** | 0.50 ** | 0.35 ** | −0.24 ** | −0.24 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.24 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.29 ** | 0.25 ** | 0.37 ** | 0.34 ** | 0.37 ** | - | ||||
19. RS | 0.23 ** | 0.23 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.13 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.31 ** | 0.24 ** | −0.18 ** | −0.18 ** | 0.09 * | 0.14 ** | 0.08 * | 0.20 ** | 0.18 ** | 0.23 ** | 0.22 ** | 0.42 ** | 0.49 ** | - | |||
20. AF | −0.07 | −0.14 ** | −0.15 ** | −0.24 ** | −0.03 | −0.08 * | −0.10 * | 0.25 ** | 0.18 ** | 0.08 * | 0.02 | 0.03 | −0.02 | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.01 | −0.23 ** | −0.18 ** | −0.49 ** | - | ||
21. CF | −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.10 ** | −0.28 ** | 0.01 | −0.08 * | −0.07 | 0.32 ** | 0.20 ** | 0.15 ** | 0.06 | 0.13 ** | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.04 | −0.10 ** | −0.05 | −0.46 ** | 0.62 ** | - | |
22. RF | −0.03 | −0.03 | −0.07 | −0.32 ** | 0.07 | −0.06 | −0.08 * | 0.28 ** | 0.21 ** | 0.14 ** | 0.16 ** | 0.18 ** | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | −0.08 * | −0.05 | −0.47 ** | 0.60 ** | 0.69 ** | - |
Mean | 3.63 | 4.26 | 4.00 | 3.11 | 4.08 | 2.52 | 3.03 | 1.49 | 0.88 | 1.78 | 2.12 | 2.52 | 3.04 | 2.81 | 2.88 | 2.66 | 4.72 | 5.18 | 5.34 | 2.82 | 3.58 | 2.79 |
SD | 0.77 | 0.49 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 0.86 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 1.12 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.34 | 1.10 | 1.41 |
a | 0.83 | 0.69 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.77 | 0.79 | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.81 |
Dependent Variable | Step | Predictor(s) Entered | B | SE B | β | t | R2 | R2 Change | F Change | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retrospective-positive | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 6.09 *** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.85 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 2.66 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.60 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 3.14 ** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.14 | 21.38 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 4.16 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.72 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1.84 | ||||||
Emotional stability | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.74 | - | |||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.26 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | −0.29 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.41 | 10.42 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.19 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.29 | 0.16 | 50.98 *** | 35.40 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 4.15 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.01 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 1.94 | ||||||
Emotional stability | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.70 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 1.18 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.42 | 10.45 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.00 | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 2.30 * | ||||||
Competence frustration | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.09 | −1.83 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.06 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.30 | 0.01 | 2.22 | 26.49 *** | ||||||
Anticipatory-positive | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 5.99 *** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 2.56 * | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 3.70 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 3.25 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 2.82 ** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.17 | 27.61 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 4.70 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.90 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 3.22 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 3.34 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 1.72 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.03 | −0.73 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 5.78 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.82 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.22 | 0.05 | 15.30 *** | 24.07 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 4.65 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.95 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 3.29 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 3.22 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 1.72 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.02 | −0.61 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 5.65 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.88 | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.96 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.11 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | −0.02 | 0.03 | −0.03 | −0.52 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.37 | 17.56 *** | ||||||
Retrospective-negative | Step 1 | Extraversion | −0.16 | 0.04 | −0.16 | −4.22 *** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.36 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.06 | −1.78 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.33 | 0.03 | −0.36 | −10.31 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.01 | −0.27 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.19 | 32.43 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | −0.12 | 0.04 | −0.12 | −3.21 ** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.94 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.05 | −1.29 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.33 | 0.03 | −0.37 | −10.53 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.78 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.06 | −1.45 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | −0.14 | 0.03 | −0.18 | −4.34 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.06 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.23 | 0.04 | 10.78 *** | 25.18 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | −0.14 | 0.04 | −0.14 | −3.79 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.55 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.04 | −1.11 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.27 | 0.03 | −0.30 | −8.35 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.51 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.05 | 0.03 | −0.08 | −2.01 * | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | −0.19 | 0.03 | −0.24 | −5.81 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 3.73 *** | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.15 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.23 | 4.76 *** | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 1.54 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.28 | 0.06 | 17.59 *** | 24.45 *** | ||||||
Anticipatory-negative | Step 1 | Extraversion | −0.10 | 0.05 | −0.09 | −2.15 * | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.49 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | −0.09 | 0.04 | −0.08 | −2.08 * | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.32 | 0.04 | −0.30 | −8.06 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | −0.02 | 0.07 | −0.01 | −0.27 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.12 | 18.55 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | −0.04 | 0.05 | −0.03 | −0.84 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.15 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | −0.07 | 0.04 | −0.06 | −1.67 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.31 | 0.04 | −0.29 | −8.13 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.56 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 3.07 ** | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | −0.22 | 0.04 | −0.23 | −5.49 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.07 | −1.73 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.18 | 0.06 | 15.31 *** | 18.06 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | −0.05 | 0.05 | −0.04 | −1.05 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 1.06 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | −0.07 | 0.04 | −0.06 | −1.59 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.28 | 0.04 | −0.26 | −6.85 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.37 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 2.85 ** | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | −0.24 | 0.04 | −0.26 | −5.96 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.18 | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.42 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 1.15 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 1.28 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.19 *** | 0.01 | 2.90 * | 14.04 *** |
Dependent Variable | Step | Predictor(s) Entered | B | SE B | β | t | R2 | R2 Change | F Change | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Controlling Cognitive Reactions | Step 1 | Extraversion | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.00 | −0.10 | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 4.24 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.83 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.15 | 0.04 | −0.13 | −3.44 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.91 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.05 | 7.67 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | −0.03 | 0.05 | −0.02 | −0.54 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.30 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 3.84 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.53 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.15 | 0.04 | −0.13 | −3.39 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.34 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 2.04 * | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 1.57 | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.08 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.07 | 0.02 | 3.73 * | 6.25 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | −0.05 | 0.05 | −0.04 | −0.89 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.29 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 3.76 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.72 | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.08 | 0.05 | −0.07 | −1.83 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 0.06 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 1.81 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.70 | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 2.72 ** | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 1.28 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 1.98 * | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 1.54 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.10 | 0.03 | 7.77 *** | 6.80 *** | ||||||
Controlling Dysfunctional Activated/Deactivated States | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.83 | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 4.62 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 2.96 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.21 | 0.05 | −0.17 | 4.60 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 3.54 *** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.12 | 18.08 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.00 | −0.01 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 4.13 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 2.56 * | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.21 | 0.05 | −0.17 | −4.55 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 2.68 ** | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.86 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3.58 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.17 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.14 | 0.03 *** | 6.93 *** | 14.19 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.01 | −0.24 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.33 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 4.20 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 2.51 * | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.15 | 0.05 | −0.12 | −3.18 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 2.26 * | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.57 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 3.03 ** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 1.96 | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.53 | ||||||
Competence frustration | −0.06 | 0.05 | −0.07 | −1.26 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 3.93 *** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.17 | 0.02 *** | 6.61 *** | 12.38 *** | ||||||
Creating Functional Deactivated States | Step 1 | Extraversion | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.01 | −0.16 | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 4.67 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 3.01 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.30 | 0.04 | −0.26 | −7.23 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 3.21 ** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.14 | 22.67 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | −0.03 | 0.05 | −0.02 | −0.61 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.32 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 4.36 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 2.77 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.29 | 0.04 | −0.26 | −7.12 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 2.66 ** | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.70 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 2.08 * | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.01 | −0.16 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.15 | 0.01 | 2.31 | 15.12 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | −0.04 | 0.05 | −0.03 | −0.82 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.30 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 4.18 *** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 2.70 ** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.25 | 0.04 | −0.22 | −5.72 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 2.36 * | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.25 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 1.40 | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 1.58 | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.05 | −1.08 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.61 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 3.14 ** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.17 | 0.02 | 4.99 ** | 12.55 *** | ||||||
Creating Functional Activated States | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 4.44 *** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 2.80 ** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.16 | 4.32 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.06 | 0.04 | −0.06 | −1.55 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 1.35 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.10 | 15.77 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 3.32 ** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 2.15 * | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 3.89 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.06 | 0.04 | −0.06 | −1.60 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.44 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.00 | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.13 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.17 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 4.35 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.06 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.14 | 0.04 | 10.16 *** | 14.06 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 3.13 ** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 2.19 * | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 3.94 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.02 | 0.04 | −0.02 | −0.61 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.17 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.01 | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.26 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 3.85 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 2.42 * | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.09 | ||||||
Competence frustration | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.01 | −0.25 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 2.02 * | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.15 | 0.01 | 3.20 * | 11.20 *** | ||||||
Instruction | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 2.90 ** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 2.68 ** | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 5.49 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.15 | 0.04 | −0.15 | −3.96 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 2.16 * | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.12 | 17.87 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 1.95 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 2.06 * | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 5.11 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.15 | 0.04 | −0.15 | −4.06 *** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.41 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.07 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 3.32 ** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 1.25 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.14 | 0.03 | 7.09 *** | 14.13 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 1.80 | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.13 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 1.96 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 5.06 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.12 | 0.04 | −0.12 | −3.10 ** | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 1.19 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.01 | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.18 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 2.83 ** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 2.26 * | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | −0.01 | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.28 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.35 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 1.94 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.15 | 0.01 | 2.11 | 10.90 *** | ||||||
Up-Regulating Self-Confidence | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 5.08 *** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 2.51 * | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 5.52 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.08 | 0.04 | −0.07 | −2.01 * | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 3.16 ** | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.16 | 25.10 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 3.74 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 1.79 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 5.04 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.08 | 0.04 | −0.07 | −1.98 * | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.88 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.65 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.25 | 6.14 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.43 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.22 | 0.06 | 18.58 *** | 23.86 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 3.58 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 1.75 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 5.00 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.04 | 0.04 | −0.04 | −1.05 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.61 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.42 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 5.61 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 1.69 | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.14 | ||||||
Competence frustration | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.01 | −0.18 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 2.34 * | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.23 | 0.01 | 2.69 * | 18.21 *** | ||||||
Promoting Goals | Step 1 | Extraversion | 0.24 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 4.93 *** | ||||
Agreeableness | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.65 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 6.46 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.08 | 0.04 | −0.07 | −2.01 * | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 1.68 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.13 | 19.73 *** | ||||||||
Step 2 | Extraversion | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 3.53 *** | |||||
Agreeableness | −0.01 | 0.07 | −0.01 | −.14 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 6.06 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.09 | 0.04 | −0.08 | −2.13 * | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.61 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.05 | 0.03 | −0.06 | −1.59 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.25 | 5.93 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 1.57 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.19 | 0.06 | 17.34 *** | 19.72 *** | ||||||
Step 3 | Extraversion | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 3.28 ** | |||||
Agreeableness | −0.01 | 0.07 | −0.01 | −0.15 | ||||||
Conscientiousness | 0.26 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 6.20 *** | ||||||
Emotional stability | −0.04 | 0.04 | −0.03 | −0.85 | ||||||
Intellect/Openness | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.32 | ||||||
Autonomy satisfaction | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.07 | −1.75 | ||||||
Competence satisfaction | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.22 | 5.23 *** | ||||||
Relatedness satisfaction | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 3.43 ** | ||||||
Autonomy frustration | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 1.33 | ||||||
Competence frustration | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.69 | ||||||
Relatedness frustration | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 1.87 | ||||||
All Predictors | 0.21 | 0.02 | 5.09 *** | 15.99 *** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Karamitrou, A.; Comoutos, N.; Brisimis, E.; Latinjak, A.T.; Hatzigeorgiadis, A.; Theodorakis, Y.; Loules, G.; Tzioumakis, Y.; Krommidas, C. The Role of Big Five Personality Traits, Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Need Frustration in Predicting Athletes’ Organic Self-Talk. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041579
Karamitrou A, Comoutos N, Brisimis E, Latinjak AT, Hatzigeorgiadis A, Theodorakis Y, Loules G, Tzioumakis Y, Krommidas C. The Role of Big Five Personality Traits, Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Need Frustration in Predicting Athletes’ Organic Self-Talk. Sustainability. 2024; 16(4):1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041579
Chicago/Turabian StyleKaramitrou, Aristea, Nikos Comoutos, Evangelos Brisimis, Alexander T. Latinjak, Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis, Yannis Theodorakis, Georgios Loules, Yannis Tzioumakis, and Charalampos Krommidas. 2024. "The Role of Big Five Personality Traits, Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction, and Need Frustration in Predicting Athletes’ Organic Self-Talk" Sustainability 16, no. 4: 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041579