Next Article in Journal
Navigating the Urgency: An Open Innovation Project of Protective Equipment Development from a Quadruple Helix Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Spent Coffee Grounds, Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria, and Medicinal Plant Waste: The Biofertilizing Effect of High-Value Compost
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermal Regeneration of Activated Carbon Used as an Adsorbent for Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of Bamboo-Based Activated Carbon for Low-Level CO2 Adsorption toward Sustainable Indoor Air

1
Department of Applied Environmental Science, Kyung Hee University, Yogin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
3
Department of Marine Science and Technology, The Federal University of Technology, P.M.B. 704, Akure 340110, Nigeria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(4), 1634; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041634
Submission received: 23 October 2023 / Revised: 25 January 2024 / Accepted: 7 February 2024 / Published: 16 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Chemistry and Air Quality Control)

Abstract

:
This study fabricated a low-cost activated carbon (AC) adsorbent from readily available bamboo trees to control indoor CO2 levels and reduce energy costs associated with sustaining clean indoor air. Bamboo is naturally high in potassium content and has narrow fibrous channels that could enhance selective CO2 adsorption. The prepared bamboo-based activated carbon (BAC) exhibits predominantly micropores with an average pore size of 0.17 nm and a specific surface area of 984 m2/g. Upon amination, amine functionalities, such as pyridine, pyrrole, and quaternary N, were formed on its surface, enhancing its CO2 adsorption capacity of 0.98 and 1.80 mmol/g for low-level (3000 ppm) and pure CO2 flows at the ambient condition, respectively. In addition, the 0.3% CO2/N2 selectivity (αs,g) of the prepared sorbents revealed a superior affinity of CO2 by BAC (8.60) over coconut shell-based adsorbents (1.16–1.38). Furthermore, amination enhanced BAC’s CO2αs,g to 13.4. These results exhibit this sustainable approach’s potential capabilities to ensure the control of indoor CO2 levels, thereby reducing the cost associated with mechanical ventilation systems. Further research should test the new sorbent’s adsorption properties (isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamics) for real-life applicability.

1. Introduction

The ever-advancing modernization increases indoor comfort, resulting in extended human indoor residence over the years [1]. Generally, humans now spend up to 90% of their daily hours indoors, including in cars, transportation cabins, malls, etc. [2]. Most times, the unconducive outdoor weather conditions require that the indoor space be isolated. Such confined spaces render indoor air quality (IAQ) inferior to outdoors, where more pronounced convective mixing enables easier dilution of polluted air with natural and cleaner air [3]. Since most indoor air pollutants (IAPs) are usually imperceivable by humans, the physical identification, characterization, and prompt avoidance of these IAPs become cumbersome [4]. Yet, the negative impact of their presence indoors, especially on human health, demands a reliable, available, affordable, but selective method for efficient and sustainable management.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been an essential indicator for IAQ Management. Not that CO2 directly harms humans upon direct exposure, but it reduces human working efficiency by lowering mental concentration, causing drowsiness and other sick-building syndrome symptoms [5]. Exposure to high CO2 concentrations for a long time may cause headaches or vomiting [6]. Thus, managing the concentration below a certain level is desirable through mechanical or natural ventilation. These approaches to reduce indoor thermal discomfort and the sick-building syndrome associated with elevated CO2 levels are often energy-intensive and unsustainable [5,7]. As the airtightness of modern buildings increases due to elevated energy costs, the CO2 concentrations in indoor spaces usually rise above the standard value [8].
The maximum permissible CO2 concentrations in indoor spaces is 800–1000 ppm. At various concentrations, inhaled CO2 could induce some health effects: physiological changes at >500 ppm [1], irregular heart rates and blood pressure at >600, sick-building syndrome (SBS) symptoms, reduction in cognitive level and mental performance at >1000 ppm, especially in children [5,6], and inhibition of various metabolic, respiratory, circulatory, skeletal, and renal systems at >10,000. Acute poisoning at 2000–4000 and 1000–2700 ppm for respective 2 and ≤6 h exposure duration could cause inflammation and cognitive depreciation [7,8]. Some indoor CO2 exposure limits indicate IAQ levels and, thus, have been adopted as monitoring standards for IAQ: ≤1000, 1000–1500, and >1500 ppm levels are generally regarded as good, moderate, and poor IAQ [9,10]. Therefore, there is an imperative need to find a sustainable control technology against the incessantly increasing indoor CO2 levels globally.
Concerning the control methods, isolating modern indoor CO2 concentrations from the influence of outdoor concentrations of >10% is challenging, especially those arising from various industrial, commercial, and traffic-related combustion processes [11]. Over the years, absorption into monoethanolamine (MEA) has been commonly used for high-concentration CO2 removal from industrial emission sources [12,13]. However, due to the unsustainability of absorption (i.e., exhibiting strong chemical bonding at the MEA–CO2 absorption interface, causing tedious and energy-intensive regeneration and reuse, enormous waste generation, and material corrosion) [14,15], it became imperative to identify a viable material and technique that circumvents the demerits earlier mentioned.
Dry-phase adsorption has sufficed as the most effective and commercialized method for low-concentration CO2 capture of approximately 1000–3000 ppm found in multi-use indoor spaces (such as subways, buses, libraries, school classrooms, offices, and workshops) at room temperature [12,16]. Adsorption has the advantages of less energy demand, ease of regeneration and reuse, ease of handling and engineering for specific applications, and abundant starting material options for environmental applications [17,18].
Although many carbon capture materials, such as metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), zeolites, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), cellulose, silica gel, polymers, and others, have been developed, they require extreme cost or low efficiency for low-concentration CO2 [19,20]. MOFs are arguably the most porous adsorbents in the market today. The surface area of these inorganic–organic complex materials could reach up to 15,000 m2‧g−1 [21]. However, besides their high cost and toxicity, their selective adsorption is low, making them unsuitable for gaseous separation as much as they are efficient gas storage materials [18]. Similarly, zeolites are efficient CO2 adsorbents. However, their affinity for moisture compromises their efficiencies for low-level CO2 removal from indoor spaces. Specifically, coconut shell-based activated carbon (AC) is a prominent CO2 adsorbent. However, its availability is increasingly limited due to environmental protection, natural resource conservation, and other competing applications of the palm fruit [19]. As a result, AC manufacturers are opting for more readily available stock materials for efficient ACs, such as bamboo [20,22]. Although recently developed bamboo-based ACs are applied in water purification, the adsorbent’s structure is considered helpful in capturing gaseous pollutants because of the similar cellulose and lignin components to those of coconut shell, which usually results in highly developed micropores through carbonization [19,23,24]. Above all, unlike the features of coal-based or coconut-based ACs, bamboo’s high potassium content would be advantageous for capturing acidic gases, such as the weak Lewis acid CO2 [25,26]. Since CO2 in indoor spaces is relatively low, its selective adsorption is essential, and the potassium component of bamboo would aid such separation.
This study used a lignocellulosic domestic bamboo-based AC to capture indoor-level CO2 selectively. In addition to the intrinsic potassium in the sorbent material, basic nitrogen functionalities were doped on the AC via amination [27]. Besides its tendency to make microporous adsorbent for indoor CO2 removal, bamboo’s high potassium content makes it an excellent and highly sustainable option for making microporous and selective CO2 dry scrubbers.
The prepared adsorbents were examined for pure (100%) and selective (0.3%) CO2 adsorption. Their physical properties and data were compared with those of commercial coconut-based activated carbon materials to evaluate their applicability for real-life use.

2. Experimental Method

2.1. Materials

Raw bamboo (Phyllostachys bambusoides) stem was acquired from a local market in Yongin-si, South Korea. The samples were cut into approximately 2 cm width and washed copiously under running tap water to remove the debris attached to the surfaces. After, it was air-dried in a clean environment. Further, to remove the sample’s moisture content and desorb other gaseous substances adsorbed, we dried it in an oven at 110 °C for 24 h before storing it in an airtight desiccator until the CO2 adsorption experiment. To compare its efficiency with prominent and commercialized CO2 adsorbents, commercially available granular coconut-based activated carbon materials, CAC1 (GA, Kuraray, Japan) and CAC2 (Wi-Fine Tech., Chungju, Republic of Korea), were procured as controlled samples. CAC1 and CAC2 have a specific surface area of >1000 m2‧g−1 (Table 1) and are specialized for gaseous harmful substances, such as formaldehyde and toluene, in indoor spaces.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Preparation of the Activated Cabon

Figure 1 illustrates the steps in preparing the bamboo-based activated carbon (BAC-N). First, the bamboo specimens were carbonized through thermal decomposition, and pores of various sizes and structures were formed through activation [16]. The carbonization was carried out in a quartz reactor (50 mm internal diameter and 100 mm length) for 3 h at 600 °C in an electric furnace under an inert nitrogen atmosphere, preventing the lignin and cellulose components from decomposing [28]. Approximately 200 g of the material was placed in the reactor before the furnace’s temperature was ramped to the target temperature at 5 °C‧min−1 and held for 6 h. Then, the reactor was allowed to cool to room temperature, and the carbonized material was retrieved.
To develop the porosity and surface area of the carbonized material, we activated the material at 800 °C for approximately 2 h under vapor at a <1.4 mL‧(gchar∙h)−1 flow rate. After the AC had been formed, it was cooled to room temperature and retrieved for further processing. The AC was then ground in a mortar. It was then sieved through a 2–3 mm mesh before storing in an airtight negative-pressure desiccator at room temperature.

2.2.2. Surface Modification of AC

Aliquot of the AC was aminated, as shown in Figure 2. In brief, about 20 g of the precleaned and dried bamboo stock material was outgassed under nitrogen gas fed at 100 mL‧min−1 in an electric tubular furnace, ramped at 10 °C‧min−1 to 800 °C. Upon reaching the target temperature, the feed flow was switched to ammonia gas fed at 100 mL/min for 2 h. Afterwards, the furnace was allowed to cool to 100 °C as the gas flow was switched back to nitrogen, which flushed out residual ammonia gas as the system further cooled to room temperature. Finally, the prepared adsorbent was retrieved and stored in an airtight electric desiccator before use [29]. All gas flows were accurately quantitated using a mass-flow controller (MFC). Samples without surface treatment were named BAC, CAC1, and CAC2, while the respective ones aminated were denoted as BAC-N, CAC1-N, and CAC2-N.

2.2.3. Characterization of the Activated Carbon Adsorbents

The AC pore structure determines its maximum adsorption amount against specific gaseous pollutants, and the adsorption selectivity varies depending on the surface chemical properties [30]. A BET device (Belsorp-mini, Microtrac BEL, Tokyo, Japan) determined the specific surface area and pore size distribution at 77 K. The MP plot analysis closely evaluated the distribution of micropores favorable for CO2 adsorption. Before the analysis, the samples were outgassed under an N2 atmosphere at 110 °C for 6 h to maintain their intrinsic state.
The chemical properties of the ACs were quantitively investigated using the XRF technique (X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Rigaku, Japan) to obtain the relative non-CHNO (metallic) composition. Further ultimate analysis was carried out (using Flash 1112(CE) Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Branchburg, NJ, USA) on BAC and BAC-N samples to investigate the influence of amination on the CHNO composition and eventual CO2 adsorption. The analysis was performed at 1000 °C on approximately 5 mg of the test samples under N2 atmosphere, fed at 100 mL‧min−1. The %CHN compositions were determined from the gas vent while %O makes it up to 100%, following the Equation (1):
C a H b N c O d + ( a + b 4 d 2 ) O 2     a C O 2 + b 2 H 2 O + C 2 N 2
More specifically, the nitrogen functionalities formed by the surface amination were determined by XPS (X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy; K-Alpha, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Branchburg, NJ, USA). Here, the XPS spectra were obtained with a Thermo-electron photoelectron spectrometer using monochromatized Al K-α radiation (1486.6 eV), with the source at 15 kV and 34 mA. The survey scans were collected from 0 to 1200 eV with a pass energy of 50 eV. The N 1s high-resolution scans were performed over 410–395 eV. The measurement was calibrated based on the C 1s bond corresponding to graphitic carbon at 284.6 eV. After subtracting the baseline, the curve-fitting was performed using the non-linear least-squares algorithm, assuming a Gaussian peak shape. Further, the morphology and surface elements were observed using an FE-SEM (Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope; LEO SUPRA 55, Hamburg, Germany).

2.2.4. CO2 Adsorption Test

The ambient low-concentration CO2 adsorption setup is schematically depicted in Figure 3. It contains a stainless-steel tubular packed bed reactor with a diameter and height of 2.5 and 15 cm, respectively [27,28]. Approximately 3–4 g of each sorbent was used to evaluate the CO2 amount captured. Here, we chose 3000 ppm CO2 as our test concentration because it is the average value (i.e., 2000–4000 ppm) whereby acute health hazards (such as inflammation) could ensue [7]. Briefly, an MFC for N2 and CO2 quantitated the amount of each gas needed to reach a gas mixer, which ensured homogenous mixing of the feed gas that mimicked indoor air. The CO2 concentration at the reactor outlet was measured in real time using a non-dispersive infrared sensor (CO2 engine K30, Esense air, Delsbo, Sweden. The sensor’s CO2 measurement range is 0–5000 ppm (±30 ppm accuracy), operating at 12 V and measuring at 0.5 Hz with a response time of 20 s diffusion time. The adsorption amount was evaluated using Equation (2) from the breakthrough curve for the continuous flow [31].
q = Q C i m 0 t ( 1 C o C i ) d t
Here, q is the adsorption amount (mmol‧g−1) of CO2 per unit weight of adsorbent, Q is the inlet gas flow rate (cm3‧s−1), C0 and Ci are the inlet and outlet CO2 concentrations (%), respectively, m indicates the mass of adsorbent (g), and t is the adsorption duration (min) [32].
Further, we investigated the sorbents’ selectivity (i.e., the preferential adsorption) toward CO2 in a binary mixture with N2. Selectivity (αs,g) represents the ability of the adsorbent (s) to remove a fluid sorptive (g, if gaseous) under ambient condition. In this case, the selectivity of CO2 is the ratio of the mole fractions of CO2 retained by the sorbents to that unadsorbed, as expressed in Equations (3)–(5) [33].
Selectivity   ( α s , g ) = C O 2 M s   ÷   C O 2 M g
i . e . , = t o t b ( 1 C t b C o ) ÷   t o t b ( C t b C o )
= t o t b ( C o C t b C o )
where M represents the matrix, and C o   a n d   C t b are initial and breakthrough CO2 concentrations, respectively. An αs,g > 1 implies favorable selectivity, and vice versa. The higher the value, the greater the feasibility and ease of selective adsorption [33]. Several parameters of the constituent gases, such as kinetic diameters and electric properties, driven by the pore structure and surface chemistry, influence such separations [32,34].
Then, a selectivity rate constant k s (min−1) was estimated by calculating the average amount of selectively adsorbed CO2 before the breakthrough by dividing Equation (6) with the breakthrough time, tb.
Selectivity   rate   constant   k s   ( min 1 ) = t o t b ( C o C t b C o ) ÷ t b .

3. Results

3.1. Preparing the AC Adsorbents

High-temperature amination impregnated basic amine functionalities on the ACs [29]. By placing the AC granules under ammonia flow in a hot tubular furnace, nitrogen functional groups from the decomposed ammonia could be impregnated on the granules.
The yield of the obtained ACs was estimated by comparing the original weight (Mi) of the raw material (that went through the washing and drying process) with the weight (Mf) of the AC obtained from the final activation step as defined in Equation (7) [32,33,34,35,36]. The final yields were 12–17% on a dry basis, similar to a biomass-based activated carbon prepared through chemical activation with KOH or K2CO3.
Y i e l d   ( % ) = M f M i × 100

3.1.1. Morphology

Figure 4 depicts the SEM micrographs of the procured coconut shell-based and the fabricated bamboo-based ACs. The bamboo-based ACs formed a regular rhombic honeycomb structure, while the coconut-based ACs exhibited irregular amorphous surface and pore structure. During carbonization, the textural characteristics are usually influenced by the distribution, location, decomposition temperature, and amount of lignin and cellulose [34,35]. Pores are formed in the granules as these substances disappear into solid carbonized substances as vapor, aerosol, and CO2 during heat treatment [37,38,39]. Thus, optimum heat treatment programs to induce the decomposition of these components to form micropores have been emphasized [40].

3.1.2. Textural Analysis

Table 2 summarizes the BET analysis results of the samples’ textural properties. The specific surface area (SBET) of CAC1 and CAC2 were 1247 and 1336 m2‧g−1, respectively, larger than that of BAC (984 m2‧g−1). However, we found that amination improved the SBET by 8.9, 1.1, and 19.4% for CAC1-N, CAC2-N, and BAC-N, respectively, showing a much significant increase with BAC-N.
Figure 5 shows the N2 adsorption isotherms for each sample, providing information on the sorbents’ pore size distribution. BAC-N exhibited a Type I adsorption isotherm, in which surface adsorption occurs significantly under <0.1 relative pressure. Thus, the adsorption showed negligible progress [41,42,43]. However, a hysteresis phenomenon showing an obvious difference between adsorption and desorption amounts was observed in CAC2 and CAC2-N at P/P0 > 0.5. This hysteresis phenomenon occurs when the adsorbent has cylindrical mesopores.
Figure 6 focuses on the pore size distribution of 2 nm or fewer micropores formed in each sorbent. The graph revealed that some mesopores, in addition to micropores, were present in CAC2 and CAC2-N. Bamboo-based activated carbons with a large proportion of micropores were composed of similar pore size distributions with coconut-based samples (CAC1 and CAC1-N). Sufficient micropores facilitate CO2 capture [44,45].

3.2. Characterization of Chemical Structure

3.2.1. Surface Chemical Composition

Table 3 shows the elemental data of the samples before and after surface treatment as obtained from XRF and elemental analyses. Regarding the non-CHNO contents, the most abundant element in each sample was Fe at 2.42 wt% in CAC1, Cl at 3.43 wt% in CAC2, and K at 3.80 wt% in BAC. Potassium, an inorganic component that can provide basic active sites useful for CO2 adsorption, was found to be present in the highest amount in BAC. This potassium content increased to 10.6 wt% after surface amination, estimated to be due to the relative increase in potassium as other elements decomposed or disappeared during the high-temperature chemical treatment. Moreover, the ultimate analysis confirms that CAC1 and BAC had similar N content (0.30–0.33%), about double that of CAC2 (0.14%). Upon animation, the %N of CAC1, CAC2, and BAC increased 5.6, 4.0, and 8.3 folds, respectively.
After activation at 800 °C, additional disappearance of trace components occurred by performing surface chemical treatment again at the same temperature. As a result, the content of other components tended to increase relatively. For example, Cu was not detected in CAC2 but appeared in trace amounts after amination (CAC2-N). Fe, a type of heavy metal substance, was simultaneously found to increase considerably. In other words, the initial sample had many acidic Cl and S components. Still, most of them disappeared as they participated in the acid–base reaction with the active species generated by ammonia decomposition. In accordance, we noticed that post-treatment with a basic gas forms alkaline active sites on the adsorbent surface and changes the chemical structure present in activated carbon.

3.2.2. Surface Functionalities

The XPS investigated the N species formed on the surface of chemically modified ACs. The N 1s XPS broad spectra were deconvoluted into various nitrogen chemical functionalities on the adsorbents (Figure 7). Detailed XPS results are supplied as Supplementary Materials. The three main N-groups identified were pyridine, pyrrole/pyridine, and quaternary nitrogen. Generally, most nitrogen functional groups are Lewis bases with a lone non-paired electron [46,47,48]. These weak basic functionalities form an acid–base attraction bond with CO2, a weak Lewis acid, resulting in increased selective CO2 removal from indoor air.
The XPS data (Table 4) show that even under the same amination condition, the nitrogen functional groups formed on the sorbents may vary with the base carbon material used [26]. The initial BAC contained quaternary and pyrrole-dominated nitrogen compounds. However, pyridinic N was predominant in the aminated BAC (BAC-N). Research has shown that the nitrogen functionalities often introduced on AC exhibit CO2 preferability in the order of pyridine > quaternary > pyrrole [46]. In practice, a >30% increase in the CO2 adsorption capacity was achieved by increasing the proportion of pyridine on an activated carbon fiber (ACF) fabricated via carbonization, activation, and amination processes of high molecular polymers [31].

3.3. Evaluating the Low-Level CO2 Adsorption Capacity

Carbon dioxide is mainly generated from occupants’ breathing in indoor spaces, worsening indoor air quality and reducing comfort. National guidelines specify 1000–2000 ppm CO2 levels depending on the facility, but it often exceeds 2000 ppm in many cases. Thus, the current study examined the effectiveness of the newly fabricated adsorbent at 3000 ppm CO2 concentration [25,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Figure 8 shows the breakthrough curves of the 0.3% CO2 adsorption experiment. CAC1, CAC2, BAC, CAC1-N, CAC2-N, and BAC-N achieved 6.16, 3.52, 27.29, 6.16, 5.28, and 43.13 mg‧g−1 ambient 0.3% CO2 adsorption capacity, respectively. As expected, these values are lower than the 100% CO2 adsorption (Figure 8) at P/P0 of 0–1.
As shown in Figure 9, BAC and BAC-N exhibited the highest adsorption capacity of 73.9 and 79.2 mg‧g−1 for pure CO2, respectively. In contrast, CAC1-N, albeit showing relatively superior micropore volume, achieved 66.0 mg‧g−1 pure CO2 adsorption.

3.4. Evaluating the CO2/N2 Adsorption Selectivity

Using Equations (2)–(5), we estimated the samples’ CO2/N2 selectivity (αs,g) and selectivity constant (Table 5).
Table 5 shows that amination significantly improved the selective removal of BAC (as BAC-N) CO2 from the binary mixture, unlike the commercial samples. We attribute the significant superior CO2 selective adsorption by the newly fabricated adsorbents to the high potassium content of bamboo biomass [26]. The enhanced selectivity is also reflected in the selectivity constant. The improved van der Waal’s force induced by the amine groups in attaching CO2 onto the adsorbent’s surface extends the breakthrough time, notably for each carbon type used in the current study.

4. Discussion

The optimal process of capturing gaseous pollutants in multi-use facilities’ indoor environments is to use a dry adsorbent because of the aforementioned inherent merits of the technology [12]. Despite the textural excellence of coconut-based ACs, alternative materials are necessary due to their limited supply. In this study, we attempted to develop an adsorbent suitable for low-concentration CO2 capture by utilizing domestic bamboo’s physical and chemical properties.
Many micropores were formed in adsorbent granules as solid carbonized substances, vapor, aerosol, and CO2 disappeared during the high-temperature manufacturing process. The increase in specific surface area after amination could be attributed to the new micropores formed or restructured accompanying the disappearing residual impurities, such as organics, due to additional reactions with the potassium component [32]. The micropore volume, as estimated by the MP plot, increased particularly for BAC, from 0.42 to 0.51 g/cm3, while the relative pore volume increased by 97%, 74%, and 100% for CAC1-N, CAC2-N, and BAC-N, respectively. The enhanced micropore development is expected to improve the selectivity for CO2 [42]. Thus, optimum heat treatment programs have been emphasized to induce the decomposition of the inherent components to form micropores [43]. This study also highlighted a previous deduction that the proportion of ultramicropores is more relevant to low-level CO2 adsorption than the total pore size, micropore size, or specific surface area [27,36].
During amination, gaseous ammonia molecules are decomposed into radicals and deposited on the surface of activated carbon, forming alkali functional groups [44]. A previous study has ensured that the alkaline active sites improve the affinity for weak acidic CO2 molecules, leading to selective adsorption [45]. Nitrogen species were more populated on BAC-N than other samples. This occurrence is probably attributed to the abundant alkaline potassium content in bamboo. The potassium forms open spaces and physical defects on the adsorbent surface by combining with the carbonization and activation of various substances, providing conditions for widespread impregnation of amine functionalities [46]. The potassium component of interest in this study was more abundant in BAC-N, and surface amination (BAC-N) increased relative to the potassium content. However, contrary to a previous report [46], quaternary N (i.e., a nitrogen atom that has substituted a carbon atom in the graphene layer), which was deemed incapable of attracting a Lewis acid (such as CO2) (due to the used lone pair of electrons in a dative covalent bonding) was surplus in BAC-N, which, in turn, exhibits excellent CO2 selective adsorption. The reason for such high quaternary nitrogen could be ascribed to the high content of intrinsic potassium in the bulk of the starting material, unlike those formerly reported where external doping was carried out [2]. Thus, more N functionalities were doped into the sorbent’s basal plane, leading to a high yield of quaternary nitrogen.
Compared with similar indoor CO2 studies (Table 6), we observed that only wet impregnation with KOH stabilization with amination [28] performed better than other samples. Also, pre-oxidation to increase the active surface for tethering amine radicals during amination did not sufficiently achieve the desired results, probably because the predominant oxygen radicals (basic ones, such as carbonyl and phenolic oxygen functionalities) on the pristine and pre-oxidized carbons were refractory to desorption [47].
The adsorption test for pure CO2 flow at ambient temperature and pressure was intended to estimate the maximum capture capability of the prepared adsorbents. The adsorbed CO2 amount differed between samples based on their respective physical (specific surface area and micropore size distribution) and chemical (surface potassium concentration and nitrogen functional group nature and content) properties [49,50,51]. According to a relevant study, in a case of potassium-doped activated carbon, CO2 desorption occurred at 94–117, 423–457, and 828–900 °C, whereas N-doped AC showed an additional desorption temperature range at 593–619 °C [51,52,53]. These assertions prove that potassium and nitrogen groups provide different active sites for CO2 adsorption. Consequently, additional active sites originating from inherent potassium in the bamboo material enhanced the adsorption.
Our results, therefore, suggest that potassium-rich stock materials (such as bamboo, plantain peel, stem, cocoa pods, etc.) could suffice as the best starting material for developing a selective activated carbon-based low-level CO2 adsorbent [52,53]. However, the sustainability of IAQ requires more studies on the impact of inhaled CO2 on human health, especially in the absence of other indoor air pollutants. Such examinations have been carried out with various indoor CO2 levels, e.g., 5000 ppm [54], 800–3000 ppm [55], 830 and 27,000 [56], 1450 ppm [57], 8000–12,000 [58], 6000–2100 ppm [59], 900 ppm [60], etc.

5. Conclusions

To circumvent the high energy demand associated with maintaining normal indoor CO2 levels via ventilation, this study fabricated a lignocellulosic adsorbent from abundantly available local bamboo trees for selective capture of CO2. The bamboo specimen was carbonized, steam activated, and then aminated to increase the active sites. The specific surface area and pore volume of the activated adsorbent were 984 m2‧g−1 and 0.42 cm3‧g−1, respectively. They were, however, improved to 1175 m2‧g−1 and 0.53 cm3‧g−1 by high-temperature amination. The obtained sample, BAC-N, showed 0.98 mmol/g (43.13 mg‧g−1) of adsorption amount for 3000 ppm CO2, higher than the coconut-based commercial activated carbons. In particular, amine groups doped on the adsorbent enhanced the potential of the inherent potassium in the bamboo raw material for selective CO2 adsorption. Consequently, as an alternative to the laborious and energy-intensive methods commonly used to maintain a conducive and healthy indoor air, this study offers a sustainable approach for fabricating a reliable, available, and affordable dry scrubbing method.
Further research to improve the sustainability of the process should attempt to reduce the energy requirement for the amination and also carry out regeneration tests on the adsorbent. Also, the amination of other potassium-rich materials (such as plantain peel or stem and cocoa pods) should be compared with the results from the current study and those from potassium-modified activated carbon to confirm the influence of quaternary nitrogen in selective CO2 adsorption. In addition, the regeneration (recycle and reuse), adsorption isotherm, kinetics, and thermodynamics should be conducted to model its real-life applicability and sustainability accurately and conclusively.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su16041634/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.J.; Methodology, W.K.; Validation, A.A.A.; Investigation, S.H. and W.K.; Writing—original draft, S.H.; Writing—review & editing, Y.J. and A.A.A.; Visualization, S.H. and A.A.A.; Supervision, W.K. and Y.J.; Funding acquisition, Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research acknowledges the support from the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (2022R1F1A106547711).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Karimi, H.; Adibhesami, M.A.; Bazzazzadah, H.; Movafagh, S. Green buildings: Human-centered and energy efficiency optimization strategy. Energies 2023, 16, 3681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mannan, M.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. Indoor air quality in buildings: A comprehensive review on the factors influencing air pollution in residential and commercial structure. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burridge, H.C.; Bhagat, R.K.; Stettler, M.E.J.; Kumar, P.; De Mel, I.; Demis, P.; Hart, A.; Johnson-Llambias, Y.; King, M.F.; Klymenko, O.; et al. The ventilation of buildings and other mitigating measures for COVID-19: A focus on wintertime. Proc. R. Soc. A 2021, 477, 20200855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Moreno-Rangel, A.; Sharpe, T.; Musau, F.; McGill, G. Field evaluation of a low-cost indoor air quality monitor to quantify exposure to pollutants in residential environments. J. Sens. Sens. Syst. 2018, 7, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, P.; Hama, S.; Abbass, R.A.; Nogueira, T.; Brand, V.S.; Wu, H.-W. CO2 exposure, ventilation, thermal comfort and health risks in low-income home kitchens of twelve global cities. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 61, 105254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gawande, S.; Tiwari, R.R.; Narayanan, P.; Bhadri, A. Indoor air quality and sick building syndrome: Are green buildings better than conventional buildings? Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 24, 30–32. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobson, T.A.; Kler, J.S.; Hernke, M.T.; Braun, R.K.; Meyer, K.C.; Funk, W.E. Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lowther, S.D.; Dimitroulopoulou, S.; Foxall, K.; Shrubsole, C.; Cheek, E.; Gadeberg, E.; Sepai, O. Low level carbon dioxide indoor–A pollution indicator or a pollutant? A health-based perspective. Environments 2021, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, M.; Ham, J.; Lee, J.-W.; Cho, H. Analysis of thermal comfort, energy consumption, and CO2 reduction of indoor space according to the type of local heating under winter rest conditions. Energy 2023, 268, 126722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hattori, S.; Iwamatsu, T.; Miura, T.; Tsutsumi, F.; Tanaka, N. Investigation of indoor air quality in residential buildings by measuring CO2 concentration and a questionnaire survey. Sensors 2022, 22, 7331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Raupach, M.R.; Davis, S.J.; Peters, G.P.; Andrew, R.M.; Canadell, J.G.; Ciais, P.; Le Quere, C. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 873–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huston, N.D. Structural effects on the high-temperature adsorption of CO2 on a synthetic hydrotalcite. Chem. Mater. 2004, 16, 4135–4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, Y.E.; Choi, J.H.; Yun, S.H.; Nam, S.C.; Yoon, Y.I. CO2 capture using aqueous solution of K2CO3-methylpiperazine and monoethanolamine: Specific heat capacity and heat of absorption. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 33, 3465–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pintola, T.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P.; Meisen, A. Simulation of pilot plant and industrial CO2 MEA absorbers. Gas Sep. Purif. 1993, 7, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Strazisar, B.R. Degradation pathways for monoethanolamine in a CO2 capture facility. Energy Fuels 2003, 17, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Herzog, H. An Introduction to CO2 Separation and Capture Technologies; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rougerol, F.; Rougerol, J.; Sing, K. Adsorption by Powders and Porous Solids; Academic Press: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gamal, M.; Mousa, H.A. Bio regeneration of activated carbon: A comprehensive review. Fuel Processing Technology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 197, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bai, J.; Huang, J.; Yu, Q.; Demir, M.; Akgul, E.; Altay, B.N.; Hu, X.; Wang, L. Fabrication of coconut shell-derived porous carbons for CO2 adsorption application. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2023, 17, 1122–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duan, C.; Meng, M.; Huang, H.; Wang, H. Performance and characterization of bamboo-based activated carbon prepared by boric acid activation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 295, 127130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sarkisov, L. Accessible surface area of porous materials: Understanding theoretical limits. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 3130–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Park, J.-W.; Ly, H.V.; Oh, C.; Kim, S.-S. Preparation and characterization of bamboo-based activated carbon by phosphoric acid and steam activation. Clean Technol. 2019, 25, 129–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shao, Y.; Li, J.; Fang, X.; Yang, Z. Chemical modification of bamboo activated carbon surface and its adsorption property of simultaneous removal of phosphate and nitrate. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, S.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, G. Tuning the morphology of micro and nanospheres from bamboo shoot shell cytosol lignin. Ind. Corps Prod. 2021, 171, 113860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, H.; Deng, S.; Hu, B.; Chen, Z.; Wang, B.; Huang, J.; Yu, G. Granular bamboo-derived activated carbon for high CO2 adsorption: The dominant role of narrow micropores. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 2354–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, W.; Wu, C.; Zhang, G.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Li, G. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic K2CO3-activated carbon produced from bamboo shoot for the adsorption of Rhodamine b and CO2 capture. Fuel 2023, 332, 126107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adelodun, A.A.; Lim, Y.H.; Jo, Y.M. Stabilization of potassium-doped activated carbon by amination for improved CO2 selective capture. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 108, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Babinszki, B.; Sebestyén, Z.; Jakab, E.; Kőhalmi, L.; Bozi, J.; Várhegyi, G.; Wang, L.; Skreiberg, Ø.; Czégény, Z. Effect of slow pyrolysis conditions on biocarbon yield and properties: Characterization of the volatiles. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 338, 125567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Laine, J.; Yunes, S. Effect of the preparation method on the pore size distribution of activated carbon from coconut shell. Carbon 1992, 30, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Goel, C.; Dinesha, S. CO2 capture by adsorption on biomass-derived activated char: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 798, 149296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mochizuki, Y.; Bud, J.; Byambajav, E.; Tsubouchi, N. Influence of ammonia treatment on the CO2 adsorption of activated carbon. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. El-Nemr, M.; El Nemr, A.; Hassaan, M.A.; Ragab, S.; Tedone, L.; De Mastro, G.; Pantaleo, A. Microporous activated carbon from Pisum sativum pods using various activated methods and tested for adsorption of acid orange 7 dye from water. Molecules 2022, 27, 4840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, T.K.; Suh, M.P. Selective CO2 adsorption in a flexible non-interpenetrated metal-organic framework. Chem. Commun. 2011, 14, 4258–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Correa, C.R.; Otto, T.; Kruse, A. Influence of the biomass components on the pore formation of activated carbon. Biomass Bioenergy 2016, 97, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Araujo, T.; Parnell, A.J.; Bernardo, G.; Mendes, A. Cellulose-based carbon membranes for gas separations—Unravelling structural parameters and surface chemistry for superior separation performance. Carbon 2023, 204, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Altintig, E.; Sarici, B.; Karataş, S. Prepared activated carbon from hazelnut shell where coated nanocomposite with Ag+, used for antibacterial and adsorption properties. Emviron. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 30, 13671–13687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patawat, C.; Silakate, K.; Chuan-Udom, S.; Supanchaiyamat, N.; Hunt, A.J.; Ngernyen, Y. Preparation of activated carbon from Dipterocarpus alatus fruit and its application for methylene blue adsorption. RSC Adv. 2020, 36, 21082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tay, T.; Ucar, S.; Karagoz, S. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from waste biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 165, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zuo, S.-L.; Gao, S.-Y.; Yuan, X.-G.; Xu, B.-S. Carbonization mechanism of bamboo (Phyllostachys) by means of Fourier Transform Infrared and elemental analysis. J. For. Res. 2003, 14, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhu, Y.; Huang, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, B.; Sun, S.; Lin, X.; Song, L.; Wu, A.; Li, H. Characterization of Lignin Structures in Phyllostachys edulis (Moso Bamboo) at Different Ages. Polymers 2020, 12, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Czernik, C.; Bridgwater, V. Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuels 2006, 18, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, D.; Wei, W.; Lu, L.; Jin, H.; Guo, L. Variation of pore structure in Zhundong coal particle with stepped K2CO3 loading during supercritical water gasification. Fuel 2021, 305, 121457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Adelodun, A.A.; Jo, Y.M. Integrated basic treatment of activated carbon for enhanced CO2 selectivity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 286, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bai, J.; Huang, J.; Yu, Q.; Demir, M.; Kilic, M.; Altay, B.N.; Hu, X.; Wang, L. N-doped porous carbon derived from macadamia nut shell for CO2 adsorption. Fuel Process. Technol. 2023, 249, 107854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, K.-M.; Lim, Y.-H.; Park, C.-J.; Jo, Y.-M. Adsorption of low-level CO2 using modified zeolites and activated carbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jo, Y.-M.; Hong, H.-E.; Adelodun, A.A. Preparation of KOH impregnated AC pellets for selective CO2 capture. J. Korean Soc. Odor Res. Eng. 2013, 12, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  47. Adelodun, A.A.; Lim, Y.-H.; Jo, Y.-M. Effect of UV-C on pre-oxidation prior amination for preparation of a selective CO2 adsorbent. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2014, 105, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, S.; Lee, Y.-R.; Won, Y.; Kim, H.; Jeong, S.-E.; Hwang, B.W.; Cho, A.R.; Kim, J.-Y.; Park, Y.C.; Nam, H.; et al. Development of high-performance adsorbent using KOH-impregnated rice husk-based activated carbon for indoor CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 437, 135378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sevilla, M.; Fuertes, A.B. CO2 adsorption by activated templated carbons. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 366, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Swietlik, U.; Grzyb, B.; Torchala, K.; Gryglewicz, G.; Machnikowski, J. High-temperature ammonia treatment of pitch particulates and fibers for nitro-gen enriched microporous carbons. Fuel Process. Technol. 2014, 119, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dilokekunakul, W.; Teerachawanwong, P.; Klomkliang, N.; Supasitmongkol, S.; Chaemchuen, S. Effects of nitrogen and oxygen functional groups and pore width of activated carbon on carbon dioxide capture: Temperature dependence. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Petrovic, B.; Gorbounov, M.; Soltani, S.M. Influence of surface modification on selective CO2 adsorption: A technical review on mechanisms and methods. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2021, 312, 110751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hui, T.S.; Zaini, M.A.A. Potassium hydroxide activation of activated carbon: A commentary. Carbon Lett. 2015, 16, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Azuma, K.; Kagi, N.; Yanagi, U.; Osawa, H. Effects of low-level inhalation exposure to carbon dioxide in indoor environments: A short review on human health and psychomotor performance. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kuga, K.; Ito, K.; Wargocki, P. The effects of warmth and CO2 concentration, with and without bioeffluents, on the emission of CO2 by occupants and physiological responses. Indoor Air 2021, 31, 2176–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Snow, S.; Boyson, A.S.; Paas, K.H.W.; Gough, H.; King, M.-F.; Barlow, J.; Noakes, C.J.; Schraefel, M.C. Exploring the physiological, neurophysiological and cognitive performance effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations indoors. Build. Environ. 2019, 156, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mishra, A.K.; Schiavon, S.; Wargocki, P.; Tham, K.W. Respiratory performance of humans exposed to moderate levels of carbon dioxide. Indoor Air 2021, 31, 1540–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tu, Z.; Geng, S.; Zhou, K.; Wang, R.; Dong, X. Human responses to high levels of carbon dioxide and air temperature. Indoor Air 2020, 31, 872–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, D.; Huebner, G.; Bagkeris, E.; Ucci, M.; Mumovic, D. Effects of short-term exposure to moderate pure carbon dioxide levels on cognitive performance, health symptoms and perceived indoor environment quality. Build. Environ. 2023, 245, 110967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Park, S.; Song, D. CO2 concentration as an indicator of indoor ventilation performance to control airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. J. Infect. Public Health 2023, 16, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scheme showing the fabrication of bamboo-based CO2-activated carbon via amination.
Figure 1. Scheme showing the fabrication of bamboo-based CO2-activated carbon via amination.
Sustainability 16 01634 g001
Figure 2. Schematic setup for surface amination of activated carbons. MFC: Mass-flow controller; Rx: Reaction.
Figure 2. Schematic setup for surface amination of activated carbons. MFC: Mass-flow controller; Rx: Reaction.
Sustainability 16 01634 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the ambient low-level CO2 adsorption test setup.
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the ambient low-level CO2 adsorption test setup.
Sustainability 16 01634 g003
Figure 4. The SEM micrographs of (a) CAC1, (a’) CAC1-N, (b) CAC2, (b’) CAC2-N, (c) BAC, (c’) BAC-N.
Figure 4. The SEM micrographs of (a) CAC1, (a’) CAC1-N, (b) CAC2, (b’) CAC2-N, (c) BAC, (c’) BAC-N.
Sustainability 16 01634 g004
Figure 5. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the tested adsorbents at 77 K temperature. Note: Hollow and grey markers signify the desorption trends of the adsorption profiles.
Figure 5. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the tested adsorbents at 77 K temperature. Note: Hollow and grey markers signify the desorption trends of the adsorption profiles.
Sustainability 16 01634 g005
Figure 6. A BJH plot of the pore size distributions of the tested activated carbons (Insert: MP plot of the micropore size (pore diameter < 2 nm) distribution). The pore volume was auto-calculated (using MP plot equation) by the BET monosorb equipment using N2 adsorption–desorption data.
Figure 6. A BJH plot of the pore size distributions of the tested activated carbons (Insert: MP plot of the micropore size (pore diameter < 2 nm) distribution). The pore volume was auto-calculated (using MP plot equation) by the BET monosorb equipment using N2 adsorption–desorption data.
Sustainability 16 01634 g006
Figure 7. Deconvoluted XPS N 1s spectra of (a) CAC1-N, (b) CAC2-N, and (c) BAC-N. Note: The black jagged-edge and red smooth lines are the sum-raw and sum-fitted spectra, respectively.
Figure 7. Deconvoluted XPS N 1s spectra of (a) CAC1-N, (b) CAC2-N, and (c) BAC-N. Note: The black jagged-edge and red smooth lines are the sum-raw and sum-fitted spectra, respectively.
Sustainability 16 01634 g007
Figure 8. Breakthrough curves for the ambient adsorption of 3000 ppm CO2 adsorption.
Figure 8. Breakthrough curves for the ambient adsorption of 3000 ppm CO2 adsorption.
Sustainability 16 01634 g008
Figure 9. Comparing the adsorption capacities of the pristine, prepared, and modified activated carbon samples against indoor (0.30%) and pure (100%) CO2 levels.
Figure 9. Comparing the adsorption capacities of the pristine, prepared, and modified activated carbon samples against indoor (0.30%) and pure (100%) CO2 levels.
Sustainability 16 01634 g009
Table 1. Properties of commercial coconut shell-based activated carbons.
Table 1. Properties of commercial coconut shell-based activated carbons.
SampleDensity
(g‧cm−3)
Specific Surface Area
(m2‧g−1)
Iodine Adsorption
(mg‧g−1)
CAC1 (Coconut shell-based AC from Kurary)2.0>1000>900
CAC2 (Coconut shell-based AC from Wi-Fine Tech., Chungju, Republic of Korea)2.1>1100>1000
Table 2. Textural properties of BAC and coconut-based activated carbons.
Table 2. Textural properties of BAC and coconut-based activated carbons.
Samplea SBET
(m2‧g−1)
b Vp
(cm3‧g−1)
c Dp
(nm)
d Vmicro
(cm3‧g−1)
e Dmicro
(nm)
BAC9840.421.80.420.7
CAC112470.561.80.550.6
CAC213360.772.30.540.7
BAC-N11750.511.70.510.7
CAC1-N13580.621.80.600.7
CAC2-N13510.772.30.570.8
a BET specific surface area; b Total pore volume; c Mean pore diameter; d Total micropore volume; e Mean micropore diameter.
Table 3. Elemental composition of prepared activated carbons analyzed by XRF and EA.
Table 3. Elemental composition of prepared activated carbons analyzed by XRF and EA.
Sample1 XRF Elemental Data (wt%)2 EA (CHNO) Elemental Data (wt%)
AlSiPSClKCaFeCuCHNO
CAC10.0970.7850.3040.568-1.3661.3432.417-89.22.030.331.56
CAC20.1910.6370.3501.3003.4301.1450.7101.635-86.22.510.151.71
BAC0.0190.3440.0560.0480.0213.8000.5270.775-85.31.500.307.86
CAC1-N0.1310.8701.931--4.8102.8752.233-81.21.411.862.65
CAC2-N0.6943.0001.4741.037-3.1261.5965.2800.78777.51.530.553.18
BAC-N--0.327--10.621.4650.220-74.20.502.509.60
1 X-ray fluorescence; 2 Elemental analysis.
Table 4. Surface nitrogen functional group of prepared activated carbons via XPS.
Table 4. Surface nitrogen functional group of prepared activated carbons via XPS.
SampleN-Atomic (%)N 1s Area Main Peak
CAC11.5586.6Quaternary
CAC20.61615Pyrrole
BAC0.52512Pyrrole
CAC1-N3.744108Pyridine
CAC2-N3.464311Pyridine
BAC-N4.335672Pyridine
Table 5. 0.3% CO2/N2 selectivity and selectivity rate constant of the test adsorbents in the current study.
Table 5. 0.3% CO2/N2 selectivity and selectivity rate constant of the test adsorbents in the current study.
Sample0.3% CO2 q (mmol‧g−1)Breakthrough Time (tb)CO2/N2s,g) Selectivity   Rate   Constant   k s (min−1)
CAC10.143.661.525.15
CAC20.082.931.164.70
BAC0.6210.78.608.48
CAC1-N0.143.641.505.10
CAC2-N0.123.631.385.05
BAC-N0.9812.713.418.2
Table 6. Comparison of indoor CO2 adsorption data from the literature with the current study.
Table 6. Comparison of indoor CO2 adsorption data from the literature with the current study.
S/NAdsorbentFabrication/Modification Methodq (mmol‧g−1)Ref.
1Coconut shell-based 1 AC
  • KOH stabilization via amination
2.230[26]
  • Wet impregnation of Ca + amination
0.280[43]
  • Wet impregnation of Ca
0.310[43]
  • Simple dry-phase amination
0.410[45]
  • 2 UV-C + O3 pre-oxidation before amination
0.260[47]
2Rice husk-based AC
  • KOH-impregnated AC
2.100[48]
3Zeolite
  • Cation exchanged zeolites 13
1.87[45]
4Bamboo-based AC
  • Simple amination
0.9803 C.S.
1 Activated carbon; 2 Ultravilet radaition-C; 3 Current study.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heo, S.; Kim, W.; Jo, Y.; Adelodun, A.A. Fabrication of Bamboo-Based Activated Carbon for Low-Level CO2 Adsorption toward Sustainable Indoor Air. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041634

AMA Style

Heo S, Kim W, Jo Y, Adelodun AA. Fabrication of Bamboo-Based Activated Carbon for Low-Level CO2 Adsorption toward Sustainable Indoor Air. Sustainability. 2024; 16(4):1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heo, Sujeong, Wooram Kim, Youngmin Jo, and Adedeji Adebukola Adelodun. 2024. "Fabrication of Bamboo-Based Activated Carbon for Low-Level CO2 Adsorption toward Sustainable Indoor Air" Sustainability 16, no. 4: 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041634

APA Style

Heo, S., Kim, W., Jo, Y., & Adelodun, A. A. (2024). Fabrication of Bamboo-Based Activated Carbon for Low-Level CO2 Adsorption toward Sustainable Indoor Air. Sustainability, 16(4), 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041634

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop