Next Article in Journal
Simulating Tree Root Water Uptake in the Frame of Sustainable Agriculture for Extreme Hyper-Arid Environments Using Modeling and Geophysical Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Bridging the Gap: Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Friendly Packages of Leafy Greens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gen Z and Their Sustainable Shopping Behavior in the Second-Hand Clothing Segment: Case Study of the Slovak Republic

by
Jaroslav Mazanec
and
Veronika Harantová
*
Department of Quantitative Methods and Economic Informatics, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 1, SK-010 26 Zilina, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(8), 3129; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083129
Submission received: 6 March 2024 / Revised: 2 April 2024 / Accepted: 3 April 2024 / Published: 9 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)

Abstract

:
The fashion industry is an integral part of people’s lives with different purchasing behaviors depending on age and education. In this paper, we focused on the perception of online shopping for second-hand clothes and shoes among Generation Z. This group has a lot of experience in using technology, so online shopping is a suitable way to buy second-hand clothes. The article aims to analyze the online shopping behavior of Gen Z, focusing on benefits, obstacles, environmental awareness, and preferred shopping platforms. We studied consumer preferences in shopping for second-hand clothes based on a sample consisting of 340 respondents representing Generation Z through an online Google Forms questionnaire published from November to January. The results show that price is the biggest advantage of shopping for second-hand clothes. Moreover, we found that the environmental aspect plays a significant role for all consumers, regardless of the online experience of shopping for second-hand clothes and shoes. The correspondence maps demonstrate that consumers with shopping experience planning a future purchase of second-hand clothing are aware of the environmental impact of purchasing clothing together with potential buyers of second-hand clothing, unlike consumers without any interest in purchasing second-hand clothing. These consumers and potential buyers of second-hand clothing consider environmental protection and high-quality, diverse (unique) clothing to be key benefits, in contrast to a smaller selection and used clothing. These conclusions provide a theoretical basis for understanding the sustainability and shopping requirements of the selected group.

1. Introduction

The fast fashion system allows companies to respond quickly to changing consumer demands at good prices. On the other hand, the environmental impacts of the fashion industry are extensive and significant. Consumers tend to own more clothing, so clothing is considered an underutilized product. [1] The fashion industry produces up to 10% of global CO2 emissions [2]. Global textile production per capita increased from 5.9 kg to 13 kg per year from 1975 to 2018 [3]. Fashion brands currently produce almost double the amount of clothing compared to pre-2000 [4]. The drastic increase in textile production and fashion consumption is reflected in the development of fast fashion, a business model based on offering new trendy clothes and shoes to consumers.
One of the ways to support sustainability is to buy second-hand clothes. Second-hand clothes represent the reuse of clothes; this clothing is part of a circular economy, unlike new pieces of clothing [5,6]. Although there are stereotypes against second-hand clothing, its consumption helps reduce the environmental and social impacts of the fashion industry [7,8]. Shopping for second-hand clothing can offer consumers several advantages, such as better prices and unique pieces of clothing; on the other hand, many consumers do not prefer worn clothes [9]. The second-hand clothing market extends the life cycle of clothing. This segment is likely to grow by 18% by 2030, a two-fold increase compared to fast fashion [10]. Second-hand fashion is an effective means of reducing the environmental and social impacts of the fashion industry [11]. Market projections demonstrate that the second-hand market will increasingly play a key role in fashion circulation [12]. In Western countries, the second-hand fashion market is still only a marginal market; customers are mainly poor people believing that the circular economy is truly sustainable [13].
Based on age, consumers can be divided into groups or segments with strong homogenous characteristics; therefore, marketers can target segments with these characteristics to offer products according to their requirements [14]. The most well-known age distribution of consumers can be classified as Gen X, Y, or Z, also known as multi-generational marketing. The division depends on birth, but there are differences in the division according to various authors. In the publication [15], the author points out these differences: Generation X is from 1965 to 1975 or 1980; Generation Y (Millennials) is from 1975 to 1980, 1995, or 2000; and the Post-Millennials (Generation Z) group is from 1996 or 2000 to the present. In the fashion industry, Gen X consumers focus on comfort when shopping for clothes and do not prefer designer clothes, unlike Gen Y. These people see designer pieces as part of their social status to impress those around them [16].
Gen Z represents young consumers “born with technology”. This factor leads to a change in the lifestyle of young people, who need to be looked at differently than previous generations [17]. Generation Z will also show a positive attitude towards the sharing economy. As digital natives, Gen Z consumers naturally appreciate those innovative businesses that allow individuals to interact and provide mutually satisfying exchanges. In the field of fashion, exploratory empirical studies point to an interesting attitude in Generation Z towards clothing lending or collaborative clothing consumption [18].
Online shopping research uses a cognitive approach [19]. Novak et al. [20] proposed a so-called “flow” to capture the customer experience in an online context. Customers do not perceive time because they are focused on online navigation on the company’s website [21,22]. Generation Z, generally women, like to buy second-hand goods, especially clothes, through online shopping [23]. P2P (peer-to-peer) second-hand firms can thus focus more on improving all shopping attributes to create a positive attitude that subsequently influences shoppers’ repeat purchase behavior [24,25].
Notorious acquaintance online platforms include, for example, eBay and Vinted, which are oriented towards clothing products. These platforms allow users to buy potentially high-quality products at a discount while allowing sellers to consign used items to make money and free up space in their homes [26]. Currently, Vinted is a consolidated leading platform for buying and selling used clothing and other materials with more than 65 million users and more than 1200 employees, operating in 16 countries: Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom, and the USA [27].
One of the key factors impacting Post-Millennials is the development of online shopping and marketing for their technological skills [28,29]. Dharmesti et al. found a positive relationship with Gen Z online shopping, which significantly influences their intentions to shop online. A good familiarity with online shopping strongly triggers their information-seeking behavior that leads to online purchase intentions [30].
There is a lot of research focusing on the purchasing strategy and habits of Generation Z. This generation is influenced by other (new) ways of approaching the fashion market [31,32,33]. Utomo et al. investigated aspects of a hedonic lifestyle such as shopping, interest in fashion, and thinking about products [34]. Generation Z spends more than USD 140 million annually and influences household purchases by more than USD 600 million [35,36]. Surveys from all continents point to the global influence of this generation [37]. Gen Z is the so-called guardian of sustainability, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC). These respondents consider quality as one of the prerequisites for purchasing and prefer to purchase sustainable products (37%), with a desire to spend more on purchasing a responsible product [38]. Research [39] claims that online shopping services have little direct effect on Gen Z’s online impulse purchases. Site quality, privacy, and online shopping services have an impact on purchases. The joy of shopping increases impulse buying behavior online. In addition to shopping feelings, Gen Z can positively perceive the relationship between sustainable behavior, satisfaction, and environmental protection activities [40]. On the one hand, sustainable behavior can be perceived by second-hand shopping, and this behavior can gain added value in the form of online second-hand shopping [41].
This paper points to insight into the behavior of Generation Z in Slovakia in purchasing used clothing using an analysis of categorical variables. Many consumers prefer shopping in the “online space” [42]. Gen Z has a lot of experience with digital knowledge [43], so this group of consumers is analyzed in this paper. This paper aims to analyze the online shopping behavior of Gen Z, focusing on benefits, obstacles, environmental awareness, and preferred shopping platforms.

2. Methodology and Materials

The total sample consisted of 376 respondents. However, this paper deals with shopping behavior with a focus on alternative forms of shopping such as buying second-hand clothes as a counterpoint to fast fashion in a specific group, namely Generation Z with a year of birth from 1997 to 2012, according to [15]. Therefore, the final sample included 340 respondents. This questionnaire was available online via Google Forms from 5 November to 4 December 2023, for a total of 30 days. The questionnaire consisted of several parts, such as the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondent, fast fashion as opposed to sustainable consumption, shopping for second-hand clothes, and swapping clothes. The questionnaire had more than 100 questions, and the total filling time was up to 15 min, depending on the respondent. All respondents voluntarily agreed to fill out the online questionnaire, and the answers were recorded anonymously. In this paper, we only focus on the part about the online shopping experience with second-hand clothes, online second-hand platforms, and the advantages and disadvantages of buying second-hand clothes. The methodology is based on consumer perception towards second-hand clothing [44,45,46].
Table 1 shows the random sample consisting of 340 respondents aged between 11 and 20 years. The majority of respondents are men (191, more than 56% of the total). In addition, almost 50% of the respondents live in the countryside, in a village with less than 5000 inhabitants; on the other hand, 118 respondents (almost 35%) live in a city with more than 20,000 inhabitants. Finally, 240 respondents from Generation Z (more than 70% of the total) have a secondary education. We found that men and women with secondary education and permanent residence in a municipality with less than 5,000 inhabitants are the two most numerous subgroups, in contrast to men and women with primary education and permanent residence in a city with a population of 5001 to 20,000 inhabitants.

2.1. Variables

Table 2 shows the categorical (nominal and ordinal) variables dealing with selected characteristics such as gender, education level, residence size, online shopping experience with second-hand clothes, advantages, disadvantages, and favorite online second-hand platforms. We did not use the category “other” for the main advantages, disadvantages, and preferred online platforms to analyze the categorical variables.

2.2. Methods

We established four hypotheses. These hypotheses were tested with the chi-square test; moreover, potential dependencies are graphically represented using correspondence maps. This paper aims to assess purchasing behavior, benefits, and obstacles on online platforms in the second-hand-clothes selling segment from the point of view of Gen Z consumers.
H1. 
The online shopping experience with SHC and the main benefits of buying SHC are independent.
H2. 
The online shopping experience with SHC and the obstacles to buying SHC are independent.
H3. 
The online shopping experience with SHC and environmental awareness are independent.
H4. 
The online shopping experience with SHC and the online second-hand platforms used are independent.
We used the chi-square test as a statistical test to determine a statistically significant relationship between two categorical variables. The overall process consists of several steps, such as creating a contingency table with actual frequencies for selected combinations of categorical variables, calculating expected frequencies (Appendix A), calculating the p-value, and interpreting the results.
χ 2 = O i E i 2 E i
where the components of the equation are as follows:
  • χ 2 : Chi-square based on a pivot table;
  • O i : Theoretical (actual) frequencies;
  • E i : Expected frequencies.
The test requires categorical variables such as nominal or ordinal variables, a random sample, independence between two categorical variables, and a larger sample. Moreover, all expected counts for a 2 × 2 pivot table must be equal to or greater than 5, unlike a table with a different size. These tables must have at least 80% of all expected frequencies of 5 or more.
Cramer’s V was used to determine the degree of dependence in the relationship between two categorical variables, such as nominal or ordinal variables. This statistical measure takes values from 0 to 1, with 0 meaning no relationship as opposed to 1.
V = χ 2 n × min k 1 , r 1
where the components of the equations are as follows:
  • χ 2 : Chi-square based on a pivot table;
  • n: Total number of observations;
  • k: The number of columns in the pivot table;
  • r: The number of rows in the pivot table.
Cramer’s V is divided into five groups:
  • Less than 0.1—weak dependence;
  • Values of 0.1–0.3—moderately strong addiction;
  • Values of 0.3–0.5—strong dependence;
  • More than 0.5—very strong association.
Finally, we applied a correspondence analysis. This statistical method analyzes the dependence between two categorical variables to identify the dependence between categories of variables based on a contingency table. This process consists of four steps: creating a contingency table with absolute frequencies, creating a correspondence table with relative or expected frequencies, reducing dimensions, and visualization using a correspondence map.
The absolute frequencies nij represent the basic input matrix for the determination of row absolute and column marginal frequencies in the correspondence matrix. The relative frequency is calculated with the row profiles pi/j and the column profiles pj/i. [47]
p j / i = n i j n i + = p i j p i +
p i / j = n i j n + j = p i j p + j
The mutual location of the points in the dimensional space determines the strength of the dependence. If the points cluster together in the correspondence matrix, it means a strong dependence. The total inertia I is associated with the variability of points according to Formula (4) [48].
I 2 = i p + j d j 2
We performed a correspondence analysis using the statistical–analytical program IBM SPSS 29 based on data from an online questionnaire [49]. The main output of the correspondence analysis is a map that visually explains the contingency between the categories examined. However, the correspondence analysis is relevant provided that the contingency is statistically significant based on the chi-square test. A correspondence analysis, as one of the few analyses, does not require the assumption of a normal distribution. On the other hand, the assumptions of the correspondence analysis include the homogeneity of variance for row and column variables. Second, the analysis assumes that the data are discrete. Third, the data should contain at least three categories of categorical variables. Finally, all frequencies in the contingency table must be non-negative [50].

3. Result

Table 3 shows statistically significant relationships between online second-hand clothing shopping experience and benefits of second-hand clothing shopping, barriers to second-hand clothing shopping, environmental awareness, and the preferred online second-hand platform based on the chi-square test (p-value < 0.05). In other words, we reject the null hypotheses, and we accept the alternative hypotheses. Cramer’s V demonstrates a moderately strong dependence (more than 0.3) between the online shopping experience of second-hand clothing and the preferred online platform, unlike the others. The total number of observations varies from 193 to 340; the other respondents were removed due to the wide variety of answers based on the “other” option in the online questionnaire. All assumptions for applying the chi-square test were met, all expected frequencies are greater than 1, and at least 80% of expected frequencies have a value of 5 or more.
Figure 1a shows that Generation Z consumers with experience of buying used clothes online consider the environmental aspect as the most important benefit of buying used clothes. A high-quality, diverse (unique) assortment is a key advantage of buying second-hand clothing according to Gen Z consumers who plan to buy second-hand clothing on online platforms. In addition, consumers with experience in online shopping but without planning future shopping consider vintage style as the main advantage. This benefit can be considered the primary reason for buying second-hand clothes in the past. Finally, other consumers without shopping experience do not plan to buy clothes on online platforms, although the price would be a main factor in a potential purchase in the future.
Figure 1b shows that Gen Z consumers who have experience shopping for second-hand clothing online do not plan to continue shopping because the clothing is old-fashioned. On the other hand, consumers shopping online for second-hand clothing consider the time-consuming search for used clothing and the small selection as major barriers to shopping, similar to consumers with a potential interest in online shopping in the future. Finally, we found that consumers without experience in online shopping for second-hand clothes are not interested in online shopping for worn clothes in the future either. Figure 1c shows that consumers with experience in online shopping for second-hand clothes and shoes, together with potential consumers, are more likely to be aware of the environmental impact of shopping for clothes. On the other hand, consumers with online shopping experience not planning a future purchase tend to disagree. Figure 1d shows that Gen Z consumers with experience in online shopping for second-hand clothes prefer future online purchases on the Lithuanian online platform Vinted, similar to potential consumers. On the other hand, consumers without experience with online shopping and who are not planning future purchases prefer the Slovak online platform Bazos. Finally, we find that others prefer the American online platforms Amazon, eBay, or Facebook Marketplace.

4. Discussion

The results are compared with other studies on shopping behavior in the fashion world. We cannot create a global view of Generation Z because the sample describes a group from a selected country.
According to Mahrs et al., this generation is interested in the climate future of the planet. The sustainability factor often outweighs price, style, and availability [51]. The previous studies [52,53] also confirmed that the reuse of clothes was not particularly motivated by environmental concerns, but by financial motives. In the study [54], four specific subgroups of consumers were identified: price-, quality- and style-oriented, brand-oriented, environmental-oriented, and socially conscious consumers. The price, environmental protection, and perceived value were the main predictors of Generation Z’s intention to purchase recycled clothing according to [55].
Our research shows that price as a motivating factor is important for more than 56% of respondents, regardless of their online shopping experience with second-hand clothing. One of the reasons may also be the age of the consumers, who may not be financially independent and need help from their parents. Sustainability is important for almost 20% and quality for 10% of respondents. Moreover, we found that 49% of respondents plan to buy second-hand clothes in brick-and-mortar stores in the future, but 33.2% of respondents prefer online shopping.
According to researchers’ predictions [56,57], during the last decade, there has been a continuous migration from the brick-and-mortar retail model to online stores, mainly for fashion shopping, in contrast to our result. Second-hand clothing is often considered sustainable consumption, although the biggest disadvantage is used clothing (more than 40%). Second-hand clothing was a major disadvantage for all consumer groups, depending on the shopping experience.
These days, slow fashion is an alternative to fast fashion, and consumers are concerned about shopping mainly because of the quality of clothes. However, the demand for sustainable products is higher because consumers have faster access to information [58]. Chinese consumers generally do not like to wear second-hand clothes, unlike consumers in Western countries [59]. For example, hotel guests never have a problem using hotel materials such as bed linens and towels. Consumers’ negative attitudes towards the quality of second-hand clothing may depend on education [60,61].
Social media has a greater influence on consumer behavior than recommendations from friends and family. Young people create relationships with fashion platforms through social networks to support sustainability [62]. These platforms include Vinted, Amazon, eBay, and others.
In our research, over 53% of consumers preferred Vinted when shopping for second-hand clothing. According to the respondents, the time-consuming search for clothes (20.3%) and the quality of the clothes offered (41.8%) are big disadvantages. Those who do not plan to buy clothes through the online platform in the future consider the vintage style to be the main advantage. In addition, these respondents most commonly use American online platforms such as Amazon, eBay, or Facebook Marketplace. The authors [63] confirmed that Gen Z appreciates the ecological attributes of the online second-hand platform Vinted. However, some participants claim that sustainable values are poorly represented in the advertising campaigns of the online platform Vinted.
Consumers without experience in online shopping for used clothes are not interested in online shopping for used clothes in the future either. In India [64], a factor analysis revealed that thrift, convenience, and social requirements are the most dominant purchasing decision attributes for Millennials and Gen Z. Moreover, the results also showed that Gen Z is more enthusiastic about online shopping than Millennials.
In the research [65], the authors suggested that the main challenge in developing awareness about sustainable clothing is to create new ideas about clothing materials. Chen argues that new products do not necessarily encourage purchase. If consumers are innovative, the retailer can implement different designs and novelties. On the other hand, if they are more conservative, the seller may rather prefer utility and environmental protection [66].
In Italy, second-hand shopping is a habit for people who cannot economically afford to buy new clothes; this survey was mainly aimed at Gen Z [67]. Another survey demonstrated that one in three Norwegians will choose second-hand products in the coming years. The main advantages are low prices and the ecological aspect; on the other hand, the disadvantage is the reduced quality of worn clothing [68]. In a Chinese survey, only 10% of respondents indicated their willingness to buy second-hand clothes, and most of them have a negative attitude. This reluctance may be related to good prices for new clothing products in the Chinese market. Younger people were more likely to buy second-hand clothes for pleasure, uniqueness, and environmental reasons [69].
The fashion industry deals with the sustainability of clothing and other challenges such as waste management, water consumption, energy consumption in transportation, and child labor. The high demand for energy and CO2 emissions are not only related to textile production but also to shipping and air cargo transport [70]. In general, Europeans are most concerned about the environment and slavery. Buddhists and Africans are most affected by forced labor; on the other hand, Americans are indifferent to both concerns [71].
Young people are more aware of the problems with the consumer society and the impact of fast fashion on the environment as well as other factors mentioned above, so they try to some extent to use alternative methods of buying clothes. Their buying behavior may encourage other consumers who are prejudiced against second-hand clothing. Moreover, retailers can also influence purchasing behavior through marketing aimed at educating and raising awareness about fashion sustainability and pointing out the negative consequences of fast fashion. This contribution mainly points to the theoretical knowledge of preferences of the young generation when buying “sustainable fashion” and contributes to other literature on second-hand purchases. For example, consumers may be cautious about buying second-hand in the online space from a safety perspective despite strong social and environmental sensibilities.
These insights can be valuable for policy makers and practitioners preferring a model of sustainable consumption in order to propose common solutions to ensure and support a sustainable economy. The findings of this study can also provide guidance for second-hand sellers (managers) to benchmark their customer service, create a positive attitude, and encourage future purchase intentions [72].

5. Conclusions

The paper focuses on the online behavior of Gen Z fashion shoppers with a focus on sustainability and their preferences. The results show that consumers with shopping experience who plan to buy second-hand clothing along with potential buyers of second-hand clothing in the future are aware of the environmental impact of buying clothes, unlike consumers with no interest in buying second-hand clothing. These consumers and potential buyers of second-hand clothing consider environmental protection and quality, diverse (unique) clothing as key benefits, as opposed to a smaller selection and used clothing. Slovak Gen Z consumers prefer shopping through the Lithuanian online platform Vinted. On the other hand, some consumers no longer plan to buy second-hand clothes because they will be old-fashioned clothes in the future. Finally, we conclude that price, as a motivational factor, plays a key role in consumers fundamentally rejecting second-hand purchases compared to others. These conclusions provide a theoretical basis for understanding the sustainability and shopping requirements of the selected group.
Limits and future research. First, our study focuses on second-hand purchases through the online space or platforms. However, the phenomenon of second-hand shopping is broader, as consumers can buy second-hand in online stores or brick-and-mortar stores. In addition, there is a need to gain a deeper understanding of the motives for participating in online second-hand markets in order to assess the impact of economic, social, and environmental factors that influence the sustainability dimension. Another limitation of this study is the structure of the sample composed of respondents from one country and one generational group. For more comprehensive conclusions, it is important to conduct further research not only at the national but also at the international level. One of the possibilities of the research is to focus on several groups with different levels of environmental awareness for a potential comparison of the buying behavior of Generations X, Y and Z in brick-and-mortar stores and online platforms with second-hand clothes and shoes. This research requires expanding the initial sample to include respondents primarily from Gen X and Y. In addition, we can focus on modeling a categorical variable with multiple variables, such as the benefits or barriers of buying second-hand clothes or shoes. segment using multinomial logistic regression.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.H. and J.M.; methodology, J.M.; formal analysis, V.H. and J.M.; investigation, V.H. and J.M.; resources, V.H.; data curation, V.H. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.H. and J.M.; writing—review and editing, J.M.; visualization, V.H.; supervision, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was created thanks to support the Institutional Research of the Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, University of Zilina (2/KKMHI/2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1 shows that 102 consumers (more than 32%) with online shopping experience plan to buy second-hand clothes in the future. These consumers see price as a key benefit of shopping for second-hand clothing online. The results show that price is the most important benefit for 193 Gen Z respondents (more than 60% of all). Moreover, we found that the environmental aspect is the second most common benefit of online shopping for second-hand clothes. All other information is shown in Table A1.
Table A1. Dataset summary I.
Table A1. Dataset summary I.
Main Advantage
PriceQuality, Diverse (Unique) ClothingVintage ClothingEnvironmental ProtectionTotal
Purchasing experienceI have not bought, nor do I plan to.Count7910317109
Expected Count66.811.88.322.1109
I have not bought it, but I plan to.Count381141669
Expected Count42.37.45.31469
I bought it, I plan to.Count55111026102
Expected Count62.5117.820.7102
I bought it but do not plan to anymore.Count2127535
Expected Count21.43.82.77.135
TotalCount193342464315
Expected Count193342464315
Table A2 reveals that 106 consumers (more than 33%) with online shopping experience plan to buy second-hand clothes in the future. These respondents consider worn clothes and a smaller selection to be the biggest barrier to a successful purchase. However, this disadvantage is also the main obstacle for other groups of consumers, regardless of the experience of online shopping for second-hand clothes (almost 45% of the total). Moreover, the results show that 69 respondents (more than 21%) consider the time-consuming search as the main obstacle when buying second-hand clothes. Finally, we found that 74 Gen Z consumers (less than 25%) without online shopping experience plan to buy worn clothes online in the future.
Table A2. Dataset summary II.
Table A2. Dataset summary II.
Main Obstacles
Time-Consuming to Look for ClothesWorn ClothesOld-Fashioned ClothesSmall SelectionBad QualityTotal
Purchasing experienceI have not bought, nor do I plan to.Count156371110106
Expected Count22.947620.59.6106
I have not bought it, but I plan to.Count2027317774
Expected Count1632.84.214.36.774
I bought it, I plan to.Count273652810106
Expected Count22.947620.59.6106
I bought it but do not plan to anymore.Count71636234
Expected Count7.315.11.96.63.134
TotalCount69142186229320
Expected Count69142186229320
Table A3 shows that the majority of respondents (almost 63%) are aware of the environmental impact of shopping for clothes. The results show that 80 out of 114 consumers with online shopping experience and a possible future purchase of second-hand clothes are aware of the environmental impacts, unlike consumers without any interest in shopping for second-hand clothes (more than 46% of respondents from this group).
Table A3. Dataset summary III.
Table A3. Dataset summary III.
Environmental Awareness
DisagreeRather DisagreeRather AgreeAgreeTotal
Purchasing experienceI have not bought, nor do I plan to.Count13404813114
Expected Count735.247.923.8114
I have not bought it, but I plan to.Count122302376
Expected Count4.723.53215.976
I bought it, I plan to.Count4295030113
Expected Count734.947.523.6113
I bought it but do not plan to anymore.Count31415537
Expected Count2.311.415.67.737
TotalCount2110514371340
Expected Count2110514371340
Table A4 shows that consumers with experience of buying second-hand clothes prefer the Lithuanian platform Vinted. The results show that consumers without interest in shopping for second-hand clothes or shoes prefer the Slovak online platform. On the other hand, consumers with experience in online shopping for second-hand clothes and not planning another purchase in the future preferred American online platforms such as Amazon, eBay, or Facebook Marketplace. Finally, we found that 103 consumers prefer Vinted (over 53%).
Table A4. Dataset summary IV.
Table A4. Dataset summary IV.
Online Platform
SlovakLithuanianAmericanTotal
Purchasing experienceI have not bought, nor do I plan to.Count1341128
Expected Count5.214.97.828
I have not bought it, but I plan to.Count10231346
Expected Count8.624.512.946
I bought it, I plan to.Count9672096
Expected Count17.951.226.996
I bought it but do not plan to anymore.Count491023
Expected Count4.312.36.423
TotalCount3610354193
Expected Count3610354193

References

  1. Zhou, X.; Meng, J.; Wang, G.; Qin, X. A demand forecasting model based on the improved Bass model for fast fashion clothing. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 2021, 33, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Niinimäki, K.; Peters, G.; Dahlbo, H.; Perry, P.; Rissanen, T.; Gwilt, A. Author Correction: The environmental price of fast fashion. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2020, 1, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peters, G.M.; Sandin, G.; Spak, B. Environmental prospects for mixed textile recycling in Sweden. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 11682–11690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Parment, A. Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping behavior, buyer involvement and implications for retailing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2013, 20, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Silva, S.C.; Santos, A.; Duarte, P.; Vlačić, B. The role of social embarrassment, sustainability, familiarity and perception of hygiene in second-hand clothing purchase experience. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 717–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kasavan, S.; Yusoff, S.; Guan, N.C.; Zaman NS, K.; Fakri MF, R. Global trends of textile waste research from 2005 to 2020 using bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 44780–44794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Peña-vinces, J.; Solakis, K.; Guillen, J. Environmental knowledge, the collaborative economy and responsible consumption in the context of second-hand perinatal and infant clothes in Spain. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 159, 104840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. McNeill, L.; Moore, R. Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: Fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2015, 39, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Özbölük, T. The pursuit of uniqueness and craving for freedom: The meaning of luxury in the age of access. Leis. Stud. 2021, 40, 227–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Turunen, L.L.M.; Pöyry, E. Shopping with the resale value in mind: A study on second-hand luxury consumers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2019, 43, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Adamo, I.; Lupi, G.; Morone, P.; Settembre-Blundo, D. Towards the circular economy in the fashion industry: The second-hand market as a best practice of sustainable responsibility for businesses and consumers. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 46620–46633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Remy, N.; Speelman, E.; Swartz, S. Style That’s Sustainable: A New Fast-Fashion Formula. McKinsey & Company. 2016. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/our-insights/style-thats-sustainable-a-new-fast-fashion-formula (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  13. Edbring, E.G.; Lehner, M.; Mont, O. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 123, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Saha, K.; Dey, P.K.; Papagiannaki, E. Implementing circular economy in the textile and clothing industry. In Supply Chain Sustainability in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises; Routledge: London, UK, 2022; pp. 239–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bejtkovský, J. The employees of baby boomers generation, generation X, generation Y, and generation Z in selected Czech corporations as conceivers of development and competitiveness in their corporation. J. Compet. 2016, 8, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Suprapto, W.; Indriyani, R.; Santosa, M. Shopping Orientation, Status Consumption, and Impulse Buying of Generation X and Y in Purchasing Fast Fashion Products. Ph.D. Thesis, Petra Christian University, Jawa Timur, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Häggmark, A.; Olofsson, F. Second Hand + Online + Gen Z = TRUE: A Quantitative Study on the Motivations behind Second-Hand Shopping for Clothes Online. 2023. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1773675&dswid=-4741 (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  18. McCoy, L.; Wang, Y.-T.; Chi, T. Why Is Collaborative Apparel Consumption Gaining Popularity? An Empirical Study of US Gen Z Consumers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kawaf, F.; Tagg, S. The construction of online shopping experience: A repertory grid approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 72, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Simanjuntak, M.; Nur, H.; Sartono, B.; Sabri, M. A general structural equation model of the emotions and repurchase intention in modern retail. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 801–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nica, E.; Sabie, O.M.; Mascu, S.; Luţan, A.G. Artificial intelligence decision-making in shopping patterns: Consumer values, cognition, and attitudes. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2022, 17, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Trevinal, A.M.; Stenger, T. Toward a conceptualization of the online shopping experience. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2014, 21, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kawulur, A.F.; Sumakul, G.; Pandowo, A. Purchase Intention of Second-Hand: A Case Study of Generation Z. SHS Web Conf. 2022, 149, 02026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Padmavathy, C.; Swapana, M.; Paul, J. Online second-hand shopping motivation—Conceptualization, scale development, and validation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 51, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parguel, B.; Lunardo, R.; Benoit-Moreau, F. Sustainability of the sharing economy in question: When second-hand peer-to-peer platforms stimulate indulgent consumption. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2017, 125, 48–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Laitkep, D.; Repkova Stofkova, K. Shopping behaviour of e-commerce customers on the example of generation Z. SHS Web Conf. 2021, 129, 02009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vinted. Available online: https://www.vinted.com/ (accessed on 13 December 2022).
  28. Tunsakul, K. Gen Z consumers’ online shopping motives, attitudes, and shopping intention. Hum. Behav. Dev. Soc. 2020, 21, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mahmood, M.A.; Bagchi, K.; Ford, T.C. On-line shopping behavior: Cross-country empirical research. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2004, 9, 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dharmesti, M.; Dharmesti, T.R.S.; Kuhne, S.; Thaichon, P. Understanding online shopping behaviours and purchase intentions amongst millennials. Young Consum. 2021, 22, 152–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Su, C.H.; Tsai, C.H.; Chen, M.H.; Lv, W.Q. US sustainable food market generation Z consumer segments. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nayak, R.; Panwar, T.; Nguyen, L.V.T. Sustainability in fashion and textiles: A survey from developing country. In Sustainable Technologies for Fashion and Textiles; Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2020; pp. 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Djafarova, E.; Foots, S. Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consum. 2022, 23, 413–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Utomo, S.B.; Jamali, H.; Arief, I.; Saputra, M.N.; Priambodo, C.G. Analysis of The Influence of Hedonic Digital Lifestyle on Consumptive E-Shopping Behavior of Generation Z Through E-Commerce Applications. J. Sistim Inf. Dan. Teknol. 2023, 5, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Campaign Monitor. The Ultimate Guide to Marketing to Gen Z in 2019. Available online: https://www.campaignmonitor.com/resources/guides/guide-to-gen-z-marketing-2019/?g&utm_medium=display&utm_source=emarketer&utm_campaign=040119 (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  36. Koch, L. Gen Z Goes to the ‘Gram for New Products, Brand Engagement. Available online: https://www.emarketer.com/content/gen-z-goes-to-the-gram-for-new-products?ecid=NL1014 (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  37. Prakash, K.; Tiwari, P. Millennials and post millennials: A systematic literature review. Publ. Res. Q. 2021, 37, 99–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. PwC Report Millennials vs. Generation Z. 2018. Available online: https://www.pwc.com/it/it/press-room/assets/docs/cs_pwc_food.pdf (accessed on 17 January 2024).
  39. Sudirjo, F.; Lotte, L.N.A.; Sutaguna, I.N.T.; Risdwiyanto, A.; Yusuf, M. The Influence of Generation Z Consumer Behavior on Purchase Motivation in E-Commerce Shoppe. Profit J. Manaj. Bisnis Dan Akunt. 2023, 2, 110–126. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dragolea, L.L.; Butnaru, G.I.; Kot, S.; Zamfir, C.G.; Nuţă, A.C.; Nuţă, F.M.; Cristea, D.S.; Ştefănică, M. Determining factors in shaping the sustainable behavior of the generation Z consumer. Front. Environ. Sci. 2023, 11, 1096183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Avci, I.; Yıldız, S. The effects of online second-hand product purchase motivations on sustainable consumption behavior and online repurchase intention in consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce (C2C) and the mediating role of electronic word-of-mouth marketing. Pazarlama Pazarlama Araştırmaları Derg. 2023, 16, 137–164. [Google Scholar]
  42. Natarajan, T.; Veera Raghavan, D.R. Does integrated store service quality explain omnichannel shoppers’ online brand advocacy behaviors? Role of memorable shopping experiences, store attachment, and relationship strength. TQM J. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Calvo-Porral, C.; Pesqueira-Sanchez, R. Generational differences in technology behaviour: Comparing millennials and Generation X. Kybernetes 2020, 49, 2755–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tarai, S.; Shailaja, K. Consumer perception towards sale of second-hand clothes in the localities of Odisha, States of India. J. Text. Eng. Fash. Technol. 2020, 6, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Burman, R.; Zhao, H. Second-hand clothing consumption: A cross-cultural comparison between A merican and Chinese young consumers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2014, 38, 670–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Na, Y.; Agnhage, T. Relationship between the preference styles of music and fashion and the similarity of their sensibility. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 2013, 25, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hanada, M. Correspondence analysis of color–emotion associations. Color. Res. Appl. 2018, 43, 224–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, Z.; Yang, D.H.; Yi, T.H.; Zhang, G.H.; Han, J.G. Eliminating environmental and operational effects on structural modal frequency: A comprehensive review. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2022, 29, e3073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Morrison, M.; Lăzăroiu, G. Cognitive Internet of Medical Things, big healthcare data analytics, and artificial intelligence-based diagnostic algorithms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am. J. Med. Res. 2021, 8, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mazanec, J. Corporate Volunteering as a Current Phenomenon in Corporate Social Responsibility to Support the Career Development and Professional Skills of Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of the Slovak Republic. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mahrs, M.; Berthem, F. Sustainable Fashion: A Generation Z Perspective. 2022. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?dswid=-6138&pid=diva2%3A1669063 (accessed on 22 January 2024).
  52. Peugeot, V.; Beuscart, J.S.; Pharabod, A.S.; Trespeuch, M. Partager pour mieux consommer? Enquête sur la consommation collaborative. Esprit 2015, 7, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Colasante, A.; D’Adamo, I. The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: Emergence of a “sustainability bias”. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 329, 129774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hur, E. Rebirth fashion: Second-hand clothing consumption values and perceived risks. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chaturvedi, P.; Kulshreshtha, K.; Tripathi, V. Investigating the determinants of behavioral intentions of generation Z for recycled clothing: An evidence from a developing economy. Young Consum. 2020, 21, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rao, R.; Sonbarse, R.; Thakur, A. Traditional vs online retail stores a comparative analysis. ZENITH Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2014, 4, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mahmood, A. The Impact of E-commerce on Traditional Brick-and-Mortar Retail Stores. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=cs&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=A.+The+Impact+of+E-commerce+on+Traditional+Brick-and-Mortar+Retail+Stores.+&btnG= (accessed on 23 February 2023).
  58. Chekima, B.; Wafa SA WS, K.; Igau, O.A.; Chekima, S.; Sondoh, S.L., Jr. Examining green consumerism motivational drivers: Does premium price and demographics matter to green purchasing? J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3436–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cervellon, M.C.; Lindsey, C.; Trine, H. Something old, something used: Determinants of women’s purchase of vintage fashion vs second-hand fashion. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2012, 40, 956–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fraj, E.; Matute, J.; Melero, I. Environmental strategies and organizational competitiveness in the hotel industry: The role of learning and innovation as determinants of environmental success. Tour. Manag. 2015, 46, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ianole-Călin, R.; Francioni, B.; Masili, G.; Druică, E.; Goschin, Z. A cross-cultural analysis of how individualism and collectivism impact collaborative consumption. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 157, 104762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arrigo, E. Digital platforms in fashion rental: A business model analysis. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2021, 26, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Palomo-Domínguez, I.; Elías-Zambrano, R.; Álvarez-Rodríguez, V. Gen Z’s Motivations towards Sustainable Fashion and Eco-Friendly Brand Attributes: The Case of Vinted. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Thangavel, P.; Pathak, P.; Chandra, B. Millennials and Generation Z: A generational cohort analysis of Indian consumers. Benchmarking Int. J. 2021, 28, 2157–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Willett, J.; Saunders, C.; Hackney, F.; Hill, K. The affective economy and fast fashion: Materiality, embodied learning and developing a sensibility for sustainable clothing. J. Mater. Cult. 2022, 27, 219–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chen, L.; Qie, K.; Memon, H.; Yesuf, H.M. The empirical analysis of green innovation for fashion brands, perceived value, and green purchase intention—Mediating and moderating effects. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gazzola, P.; Pavione, E.; Pezzetti, R.; Grechi, D. Trends in the Fashion Industry. The Perception of Sustainability and Circular Economy: A Gender/Generation Quantitative Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huynh, P.H. Enabling circular business models in the fashion industry: The role of digital innovation. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2021, 71, 870–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liang, J.; Xu, Y. Second-hand clothing consumption: A generational cohort analysis of the Chinese market. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2018, 42, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Turker, D.; Altuntas, C. Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: An analysis of corporate reports. Eur. Manag. J. 2014, 32, 837–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chan, T.Y.; Wong, C.W.Y. The consumption side of sustainable fashion supply chain: Understanding fashion consumer decision. J. Fash. Mark. Manag. 2012, 16, 193–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nghiêm-Phú, B. The Projected Images of a Thrift Store Chain in Japan: A Study of Online Interview Materials. In Handbook of Research on Green, Circular, and Digital Economies as Tools for Recovery and Sustainability; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 311–328. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Correspondence maps. (a) The online shopping experience with SHC and the main benefits of buying SHC are independent. (b) The online shopping experience with SHC and the main obstacle to buying SHC are independent. (c) The shopping experience of online shopping for SHC and environmental awareness are independent. (d) The online shopping experience with SHC and the online second-hand platform used are independent.
Figure 1. Correspondence maps. (a) The online shopping experience with SHC and the main benefits of buying SHC are independent. (b) The online shopping experience with SHC and the main obstacle to buying SHC are independent. (c) The shopping experience of online shopping for SHC and environmental awareness are independent. (d) The online shopping experience with SHC and the online second-hand platform used are independent.
Sustainability 16 03129 g001
Table 1. Sample.
Table 1. Sample.
Gender/Education LevelUp to 5000 Inhabitants5001–20,000 InhabitantsMore than 20,000 InhabitantsTotal
Male863174191
Elementary education4149
Secondary education592551135
University education2351947
Female743144149
Elementary school131216
Secondary School482631105
University education1341128
Total16062118340
Table 2. Descriptive statistics.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics.
VariableAcronymCategoryN%ModusMedian
Gender0Men19156.200
1Women14943.8
Education level0Elementary education257.411
1Secondary education24070.6
2University education7522.1
Residence size0Up to 5000 inhabitants16047.101
15001–20,000 inhabitants 6218.2
2More than 20,000 inhabitants11834.7
Online shopping experience with shopping for SHC0I have not bought, nor do I plan to.11433.500
1I have not bought it, but I plan to.7622.4
2I bought it, I plan to.11333.2
3I bought it but do not plan to anymore.3710.9
Ecological awareness0Disagree216.222
1Rather disagree10530.9
2Rather agree14342.1
3Agree7120.9
The main advantage of shopping for SHC0Price19356.800
1Quality, diverse (unique) clothing3410.0
2Vintage style247.1
3Environmental protection6418.8
4Other257.4
The main disadvantage of shopping for SHC0Time-consuming to look for clothes6920.311
1Worn clothes14241.8
2Old-fashioned clothes 185.3
3Small selection6218.2
4Bad quality298.5
5Other205.9
Preferred online second-hand platform0Slovak online platforms3610.632
1Lithuanian online platforms10330.3
2American online platforms 5415.9
3Other14743.2
Table 3. Hypothesis.
Table 3. Hypothesis.
Null HypothesisPearson Chi-SquareDfp-ValueCramer’s VN
The online shopping experience with SHC and the main benefits of buying SHC are independent.21,187 a90.0120.150315
The online shopping experience with SHC and the obstacles to buying SHC are independent.22,982 b120.1550.028320
The online shopping experience with SHC and environmental awareness are independent.22,843 c90.0070.150340
The online shopping experience with SHC and the online second-hand platforms used are independent.35,110 d60.0000.302193
a Two cells (12.5%) have an expected count of less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.67. b Three cells (15%) have an expected count of less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.91. c Two cells (12.5%) have an expected count of less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.29. d One cell (8.3%) has an expected count of less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.29.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mazanec, J.; Harantová, V. Gen Z and Their Sustainable Shopping Behavior in the Second-Hand Clothing Segment: Case Study of the Slovak Republic. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083129

AMA Style

Mazanec J, Harantová V. Gen Z and Their Sustainable Shopping Behavior in the Second-Hand Clothing Segment: Case Study of the Slovak Republic. Sustainability. 2024; 16(8):3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mazanec, Jaroslav, and Veronika Harantová. 2024. "Gen Z and Their Sustainable Shopping Behavior in the Second-Hand Clothing Segment: Case Study of the Slovak Republic" Sustainability 16, no. 8: 3129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083129

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop