Assessing Green Practices on Eco-Friendly Hotel Customer Loyalty: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Hybrid Approach
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. The Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) Theory
2.2. Review of Previous Studies
2.3. Eco-Friendly Hotel
2.4. Service Quality (SQ)
2.5. Green Practice (GP)
2.6. Perceived Value (PV)
2.7. Environmental Sensitivity (ENS)
2.8. Satisfaction
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Participants and Sample Design
3.2. Measures
4. Results and Findings
4.1. Measurement Model Results Using PLS-SEM
4.2. Structural Model Results Using PLS-SEM
4.2.1. PLS Predict
4.2.2. Findings from fsQCA
5. Discussion
6. Research Implication
6.1. Theoretical Implication
6.2. Managerial Implication
7. The Limitations of the Research and Scope for Future Work
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs | Items | Questions | Sources |
---|---|---|---|
Revisit intention | RVI1 | I will revisit eco-friendly hotels in the near future. | [91] |
RVI2 | My happy experience with eco-friendly hotel inspires me to revisit the hotel. | ||
RVI3 | There is a high chance that I will revisit the eco-friendly hotel on my next holiday. | ||
Willingness to pay a premium | WTPP1 | It is acceptable to pay a premium to stay at a hotel that engages in environmentally friendly practices. | [35] |
WTPP2 | I am willing to pay more to stay at an environmentally friendly hotel. | ||
WTPP3 | I am willing to spend extra to support the hotel’s effort to be environmentally sustainable. | ||
Word-of-mouth intention | WOMI1 | I will encourage my friends and relatives to stay at an eco-friendly hotel during traveling outside. | [6] |
WOMI2 | I will say positive things about an environmentally friendly hotel to others. | ||
WOMI3 | I strongly recommend eco-friendly hotels due to their environmental features. | ||
Satisfaction | SAT1 | I am satisfied with my experience in the eco-friendly hotel. | [6,58] |
SAT2 | My expectations were satisfied during my visit to the eco-friendly hotel. | ||
SAT3 | Overall, I am happy visiting eco-friendly hotels because they are environmentally friendly. | ||
SAT4 | Overall, I am satisfied with the eco-friendly hotel I visited because of its environmental performance. | ||
Service quality | SQ1 | I think that an eco-friendly hotel has hygienic and attractive dining areas. | [92] |
SQ2 | Overall, the rooms and accommodations at an eco-friendly hotel are clean and comfortable. | ||
SQ3 | The services offered by my visited eco-friendly hotel met my needs and expectations. | ||
SQ4 | I think that the facilities and atmosphere of a green hotel are preferable. | ||
Green practice | GP1 | The hotel I visited has implemented water- and energy-saving practices. | [58] |
GP2 | My visited hotel separates waste during collection, to reduce the amount of waste. | ||
GP3 | My visited hotel provides its guests with information on how they can contribute to reduce the hotel’s environmental impact. | ||
Perceived value | PV1 | The eco-friendly hotel I visited offers expected environmentally friendly services. | [93] |
PV2 | The services provided by the eco-friendly hotel are good for what I have to pay. | ||
PV3 | The food that I purchased from the eco-friendly hotel during my visit was a good buy in terms of green attributes and my money spending. | ||
Environmental sensitivity | ENS1 | The eco-friendly hotel I visited offers sustainable products and services for visitors. | [19] |
ENS2 | The eco-friendly hotel I visited contributes to the environment by reducing food and other types of wastages. | ||
ENS3 | The eco-friendly hotel I visited contributes to the environment by reducing water and electricity wastage. | ||
ENS4 | The eco-friendly hotel I visited use environmentally sustainable energy to serve the visitors. |
References
- Chanda, R.C.; Isa, S.M.; Ahmed, T. Factors influencing customers’ green purchasing intention: Evidence from developing country. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moise, M.S.; Gil-Saura, I.; Ruiz Molina, M.E. The importance of green practices for hotel guests: Does gender matter? Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraživanja 2021, 34, 3508–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assaker, G. The effects of hotel green business practices on consumers’ loyalty intentions: An expanded multidimensional service model in the upscale segment. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 3787–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galati, A.; Thrassou, A.; Christofi, M.; Vrontis, D.; Migliore, G. Exploring travelers’ willingness to pay for eco-friendly hotels in the digital era. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- WTTC. Trending in Travel. Emerging consumer trends in Travel & Tourism in 2021 and beyond. World Travel & Tourism Council. 2021. Available online: https://wttc.org/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2021/Trending_In_Travel-Emerging_Consumer_Trends-231121.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2024).
- Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Xue, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, J. Green image and consumers’ word-of-mouth intention in the eco-friendly hotel industry: The moderating effect of Millennials. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrontis, D.; Christofi, M.; Giacosa, E.; Serravalle, F. Sustainable Development in Tourism: A Stakeholder Analysis of the Langhe Region. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2022, 46, 846–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, V.; Sajnani, M.; Dixit, S.K.; Mishra, A.; Gani, M.O. Are consumers influenced by the use of green practices in five-star hotels: An assessment of guest’s revisit intentions, inclusive ratings and hotel performance. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2022, 9, 159–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yarimoglu, E.; Gunay, T. The extended theory of planned behavior in Turkish customers’ intentions to visit eco-friendly hotels. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1097–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadiq, M.; Adil, M.; Paul, J. Eco-friendly hotel stays and environmental attitude: A value-attitude-behaviour perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 100, 103094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patwary, A.K.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Rabiul, M.K.; Aziz, R.C.; Hanafiah, M.H. Linking environmental knowledge, environmental responsibility, altruism, and intention toward eco-friendly hotels through ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 4653–4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eid, R.; Agag, G.; Shehawy, Y.M. Understanding Guests’ Intention to Visit Eco-friendly hotels. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2021, 45, 494–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Yu, J.; Hyun, S.S. Effects of nature-based solutions (NBS) on eco-friendly hotel guests’ mental health perceptions, satisfaction, switching barriers, and revisit intentions. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 592–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Huy, L.; Nguyen, H.T.T.; Hoang Long, P.; Quyen Phu Thi, P.; Tan Nhat, P. Going green: Predicting tourists’ intentions to stay at eco-friendly hotels—The roles of green attitude and environmental concern. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights, 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, T.; Chen, J.S.; Ramos, W.D.; Sharma, A. Visitors’ eco-innovation adoption and green consumption behavior: The case of green hotels. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 36, 1005–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, T.; Chen, J.S. Expected Green Hotel Attributes: Visit Intentions in Light of Climate Change and COVID-19 Double Whammy; Chen, J.S., Ed.; Advances in Hospitality and Leisure (Advances in Hospitality and Leisure, Vol. 18); Emerald Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2023; pp. 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Konuk, F.A. The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajput, A.; Gahfoor, R.Z. Satisfaction and revisit intentions at fast food restaurants. Future Bus. J. 2020, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaturvedi, P.; Kulshreshtha, K.; Tripathi, V.; Agnihotri, D. Investigating the impact of restaurants’ sustainable practices on consumers’ satisfaction and revisit intentions: A study on leading green restaurants. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2022, 16, 41–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assaker, G.; O’Connor, P.; El-Haddad, R. Examining an integrated model of green image, perceived quality, satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in upscale hotels. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 934–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z. The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of stimulus-organism-response paradigm. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, L.; Swanson, S.R.; Chen, X. The impact of perceived service fairness and quality on the behavioural intentions of Chinese hotel guests: The mediating role of consumption emotions. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2016, 33 (Suppl. 1), 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruan, W.Q.; Zhang, S.N.; Liu, C.H.; Li, Y.Q. A new path for building hotel brand equity: The impacts of technological competence and service innovation implementation through perceived value and trust. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 911–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, H.; Liu, Y.; Kumail, T.; Pan, L. Tourism destination brand equity, brand authenticity and revisit intention: The mediating role of tourist satisfaction and the moderating role of destination familiarity. Tour. Rev. 2022, 77, 751–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hameed, I.; Hussain, H.; Khan, K. The role of green practices toward the green word-of-mouth using stimulus-organism-response model. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2021, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, L.L. A stimulus-organism-response perspective to examine green hotel patronage intention. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2023, 35, 1552–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, M.S.; Hampson, D.P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H. Consumer confidence and green purchase intention: An application of the stimulus-organism-response model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 68, 103061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhir, A.; Talwar, S.; Sadiq, M.; Sakashita, M.; Kaur, P. Green apparel buying behaviour: A Stimulus–Organism–Behavior–Consequence (SOBC) perspective on sustainability-oriented consumption in Japan. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 3589–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, H.; Wang, X.; Wu, M.Y.; Wei, W.; Morrison, A.M.; Kelly, C. The effect of destination source credibility on tourist environmentally responsible behavior: An application of stimulus-organism-response theory. J. Sustain. Tour. 2023, 31, 1797–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyay, N.; Kamble, A. Examining Indian consumer pro-environment purchase intention of electric vehicles: Perspective of stimulus-organism-response. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 189, 122344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, N.; Verma, S.; Chikhalkar, R.D. eWOM, destination preference and consumer involvement—A stimulus-organism-response (SOR) lens. Tour. Rev. 2021, 77, 1135–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, W.; Tsai, H.; Chuang, H.; Lin, P.; Ho, T. How can emerging event sustainably develop in the tourism industry? From the perspective of the SOR model on a two-year empirical study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basarir-Ozel, B.; Nasir, V.A.; Turker, H.B. Determinants of smart home adoption and differences across technology readiness segments. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2023, 197, 122924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Rodríguez, M.R.; Díaz-Fernández, M.C.; Font, X. Factors influencing willingness of customers of environmentally friendly hotels to pay a price premium. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 60–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksu, A.; Albayrak, T.; Caber, M. Hotel customer segmentation according to eco-service quality perception: The case of Russian tourists. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2022, 5, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kapoor, P.S.; Balaji, M.S.; Jiang, Y.; Jebarajakirthy, C. Effectiveness of Travel Social Media Influencers: A Case of Eco-Friendly Hotels. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 1138–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.-E.; Kang, E. The Mediating Role of Eco-Friendly Artwork for Urban Hotels to Attract Environmental Educated Consumers. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salah, M.H.A.; Abdou, A.H.; Hassan, T.H.; El-Amin, M.A.-M.M.; Kegour, A.B.A.; Alboray, H.M.M.; Mohamed, A.S.D.; Ali, H.S.A.M.; Mohammed, E.F.A. Power of eWOM and Its Antecedents in Driving Customers’ Intention to Revisit: An Empirical Investigation on Five-Star Eco-Friendly Hotels in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kokkhangplu, A.; Onlamai, W.; Chokpreedapanich, T.; Phikul, K. What Predicts Behavioral Intention in Eco-Friendly Hotels? The Roles of Tourist’s Perceived Value and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Thailand. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Hernández-Perlines, F.; Vega-Muñoz, A.; Han, H. Hotels’ Eco-Friendly Physical Environment as Nature-Based Solutions for Decreasing Burnout and Increasing Job Satisfaction and Performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdou, A.H.; Shehata, H.S.; Mahmoud HM, E.; Albakhit, A.I.; Almakhayitah, M.Y. The effect of environmentally sustainable practices on customer citizenship behavior in eco-friendly hotels: Does the green perceived value matter? Sustainability 2022, 14, 7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W.-H.; Cheng, C.-C. Less is more: A new insight for measuring service quality of eco-friendly hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 68, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, M.A.; Davis, E.A.; Weaver, P.A. Eco-friendly attitudes, barriers to participation, and differences in behavior at green hotels. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2014, 55, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadegaridehkordi, E.; Nilashi, M.; Nizam Bin Md Nasir, M.H.; Momtazi, S.; Samad, S.; Supriyanto, E.; Ghabban, F. Customers segmentation in eco-friendly hotels using multi-criteria and machine learning techniques. Technol. Soc. 2021, 65, 101528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabatabaei, F.; Beldona, S. Are eco-friendly hotels inconvenient? An Implicit Association Test. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2024, 58, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xess, A.; Bhargave, H.; Kumar, P. A study on influence of eco-friendly technologies in hospitality industry. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1950, No. 1, p. 012024); IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, A.A.-T.; Rahman, M.T. Factors influencing eco-friendly hotel revisit intentions after the COVID-19 in Bangladesh. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2022, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, I. The interplay of product involvement and sustainable consumption: An empirical analysis of behavioural intentions related to eco-friendly hotels, organic wines and green cars. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 26, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Bernard, S.; Rahman, I. Greenwashing in hotels: A structural model of trust and behavioral intentions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. Vol. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, I.K.W.; Hitchcock, M.; Yang, T.; Lu, T.W. Literature review on service quality in hospitality and tourism (1984–2014): Future directions and trends. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 114–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashish ME, S.; Abdou, A.H.; Mohamed SA, K.; Elenain AS, A.; Salama, W. The Nexus between green perceived quality, green satisfaction, green trust, and customers’ green behavioral intentions in eco-friendly hotels: A structural equation modeling approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nilashi, M.; Abumalloh, R.A.; Almulihi, A.; Alrizq, M.; Alghamdi, A.; Ismail, M.Y.; Bashar, A.; Zogaan, W.A.; Asadi, S. Big social data analysis for impact of food quality on travelers’ satisfaction in eco-friendly hotels. ICT Express 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, V.K.; Chandra, B. An application of theory of planned behavior to predict young Indian consumers’ eco-friendly hotel visit intention. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 1152–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasimu, A.B.; Zaiton, S.; Hassan, H. Hotels involvement in sustainable tourism practices in Klang Valley. Malaysia. Int. J. Econ. Manag. 2012, 6, 21–34. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.J.; Palakurthi, R.; Hancer, M. The environmentally friendly programs in hotels and customers’ intention to stay: An online survey approach. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2012, 13, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merli, R.; Preziosi, M.; Acampora, A.; Ali, F. Why should hotels go green? Insights from guests experience in eco-friendly hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 81, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, H.; Hsu LT, J.; Lee, J.S.; Sheu, C. Are lodging customers ready to go green? An examination of attitudes, demographics, and eco-friendly intentions. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 30, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Adly, M.I. Modelling the relationship between hotel perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 322–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heydari Fard, M.; Sanayei, A.; Ansari, A. Determinants of Medical Tourists’ Revisit and Recommend Intention. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2021, 22, 429–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S.; Sharma, P.; Garg, N.; Bala, R. Groping environmental sensitivity as an antecedent of environmental behavioural intentions through perceived environmental responsibility. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ. 2022, 16, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Taheri, B.; Gannon, M.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Hanifah, H. Does living in the vicinity of heritage tourism sites influence residents’ perceptions and attitudes? J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 1295–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helm, S.V.; Pollitt, A.; Barnett, M.A.; Curran, M.A.; Craig, Z.R. Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2018, 48, 158–167. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H. Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1021–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gupta, A.; Dash, S.; Mishra, A. All that glitters is not green: Creating trustworthy ecofriendly services at green hotels. Tour. Manag. 2019, 70, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarmiento, C.V.; El Hanandeh, A. Customers’ perceptions and expectations of environmentally sustainable restaurant and the development of green index: The case of the Gold Coast, Australia. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2018, 15, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvestri, C.; Aquilani, B.; Ruggieri, A. Service quality and customer satisfaction in thermal tourism. TQM J. 2017, 29, 55–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, R.L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. J. Mark. Res. 1980, 17, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seyfi, S.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Esfandiar, K. Can tourist engagement enhance tourist behavioural intentions? A combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2024, 49, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Jain, A.; Hsieh, J.-K. Impact of apps aesthetics on revisit intentions of food delivery apps: The mediating role of pleasure and arousal. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 63, 102686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, S.; Qu, H.; Wang, X. Impact of green marketing on peer-to-peer accommodation platform users’ repurchase intention and positive word-of-mouth: Mediation of trust and consumer identification. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2024, 36, 691–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanda, R.C.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Ahmed, T.; Nawaser, K. Investigating the factors influencing e-banking service adoption during COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Product. Qual. Manag. 2024, 41, 197–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kock, N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. E-Collab. (Ijec) 2015, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Seyfi, S.; Hall, C.M.; Hatamifar, P. Understanding memorable tourism experiences and behavioural intentions of heritage tourists. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2021, 21, 100621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Risher, J.J.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2019, 31, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Thomas, G.; Hult, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oakes, CA, USA.
- Ragin, C.C. Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Anal. 2006, 14, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappas, I.O.; Giannakos, M.N.; Jaccheri, L.; Sampson, D.G. Assessing student behavior in computer science education with an fsQCA approach: The role of gains and barriers. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (TOCE) 2017, 17, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Woodside, A.G. Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K.; Lee, K.Y.; Sheehan, L. Hey Alexa! A magic spell of social glue? Sharing a smart voice assistant speaker and its impact on users’ perception of group harmony. Inf. Syst. Front. 2020, 22, 563–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, V.H.; Hew, J.J.; Leong, L.Y.; Tan GW, H.; Ooi, K.B. Wearable payment: A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 157, 113477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, N.; Bao, Y.; Chiong, R. A multi-method analytical approach to predicting young adults’ intention to invest in mHealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemat. Inform. 2022, 68, 101765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sindarov, A.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Syafrizal, S.; Chanda, R.C. Big data analytical capability and firm performance: Moderating effect of analytics capability business strategy alignment. Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci. 2023, 16, 663–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M.; Olya, H. The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 1571–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fotiadis, A. Modelling wedding marketing strategies: An fsQCA analysis. Journal of Tourism, Herit. Serv. Mark. 2018, 4, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Seyfi, S.; Rather, R.A.; Hall, C.M. Investigating the mediating role of visitor satisfaction in the relationship between memorable tourism experiences and behavioral intentions in heritage tourism context. Tour. Rev. 2021, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappas, I.O.; Woodside, A.G. Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 58, 102310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S.; Becker, J.-M. SmartPLS 3, SmartPLS, Boenningstedt [online] 2015. Available online: https://www.smartpls.com (accessed on 22 January 2024).
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Khoo-Lattimore, C.; Md Noor, S.; Jaafar, M.; Konar, R. Tourist engagement and loyalty: Gender matters? Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, W.-C.; Wan Ibrahim, W.H.; Lo, M.-C.; Mohamad, A.A.; Ramayah, T.; Chin, C.-H. Controllable drivers that influence tourists’ satisfaction and revisit intention to Semenggoh Nature Reserve: The moderating impact of destination image. J. Ecotourism 2022, 21, 147–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.-S.; Hsu, L.-T.; Han, H.; Kim, Y. Understanding how consumers view eco-friendly hotels: How a hotel’s green image can influence behavioural intentions. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 901–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riva, F.; Magrizos, S.; Rubel MR, B.; Rizomyliotis, I. Green consumerism, green perceived value, and restaurant revisit intention: Millennials’ sustainable consumption with moderating effect of green perceived quality. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 2807–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanda, R.C.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Syafrizal, S.; Hanifah, H.; Singh, K.S.D. Investigating the determinants of mobile shopping applications continuance usage intention in the post-COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Appl. Manag. Sci. 2023, 15, 326–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louis, E.N.; Sartono, E.S.; Patricia, E.; Gui, A.; Shaharudin, M.S.; Pitchay, A.A.; Chanda, R.C. Factors Influencing Customers Intention to Use Digital Banking Services. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15–16 July 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Ng, S.X.; Hanifah, H.; Teoh, A.P.; Nawaser, K. Safety technology adoption: Predicting intention to use car dashcams in an emerging country. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 2021, 18, 2150022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vellamy, F.; Wijaya, D.A.; Gui, A.; Shaharudin, M.S.; Pitchay, A.A.; Chanda, R.C. The Role of Social Media on Purchase Decisions in Indonesia: Perspective of Z Generation. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications (ISIEA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 15–16 July 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patricia, E.; Cresentia, T.; Chanda, R.C.; Gui, A. Evaluating e-WOM and Factors Influencing Purchase Intention in Instagram Commerce. In Proceedings of the 2023 10th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), Semarang, Indonesia, 31 August–1 September 2023; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 149–154. [Google Scholar]
- Gui, A.; Antonio, F.; Shaharudin, M.S.; Princes, E.; So, I.G.; Chanda, R.C. Drivers and Barriers of Cloud Accounting Adoption. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE 9th International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 7–8 November 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shmueli, G.; Sarstedt, M.; Hair, J.F.; Cheah, J.H.; Ting, H.; Vaithilingam, S.; Ringle, C.M. Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLS predict. Eur. J. Mark. 2019, 53, 2322–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathavan, B.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Hanifah, H.; Ramayah, T.; Kurnia, S. Understanding the purchase intention of fitness wearables: Using value-based adoption model. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2022, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanda, R.C.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Hanifah, H.; Ramayah, T. Investigating factors influencing individual user’s intention to adopt cloud computing: A hybrid approach using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Kybernetes 2023. Available online: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/K-01-2023-0133/full/html (accessed on 22 January 2024).
- Rubinson, C. Presenting qualitative comparative analysis: Notation, tabular layout, and visualization. Methodol. Innov. 2019, 12, 2059799119862110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiss, P.C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 54, 393–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanda, R.C.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Hanifah, H.; Thurasamy, R. Modeling eco-friendly house purchasing intention: A combined study of PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches. Int. J. Hous. Mark. Anal. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mikalef, P.; Pateli, A. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 70, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kristanti, M.; Jokom, R. The influence of eco-friendly attitudes on tourists’ intention toward green hotels. In Balancing Development and Sustainability in Tourism Destinations: Proceedings of the Tourism Outlook Conference 2015; Springer: Singapore, 2017; pp. 21–29. [Google Scholar]
Author | Tittle | Objective | Types of Samples | Major Findings | Country |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basarir-Ozel et al. (2023) [34] | “Big social data analysis for impact of food quality on travellers’ satisfaction in eco-friendly hotels”. | To understand whether food quality impacts the relationship between hotel performance criteria and travelers’ satisfaction, using big data analysis. | Customers’ online reviews | Eco-friendly hotels’ performance criteria are significantly but positively associated with satisfaction of customers. | Malaysia |
González-Rodríguez et al. (2020) [35] | “Factors influencing willingness of customers of environmentally friendly hotels to pay a price premium”. | To understand how environmental practices and image of hotels influence their intention to pay a price premium for staying at environmentally friendly hotels. | Customers staying at eco-friendly hotels | The findings of this study indicate that environmentally concerned customers prefer to pay a premium price, compared to people with positive perception toward eco-friendly hotels. | Spain |
Sharma et al. (2024) [15] | “Visitors’ eco-innovation adoption and green consumption behaviour: the case of green hotels”. | To investigate the way green hotel attributes influence visitors’ adoption of eco-friendly hotels and their intentions to partake in green initiatives. | Visitors of green hotels | Visitors’ perception of newness and uniqueness of eco-innovative attributes influence their visit intention and green consumption behavior. | USA |
Aksu et al. (2022) [36] | “Hotel customer segmentation according to eco-service quality perception: the case of Russian tourists”. | To investigate the components of eco-service quality at hotels and to cluster hotel customers based on their eco-service quality perceptions. | Russian tourists | Environmentally sensitive customers feel satisfied when they found that their visiting hotel practice eco-friendly services and offer organic foods. | Turkey |
Yu et al. (2020) [41] | “Hotels’ Eco-Friendly Physical Environment as Nature-Based Solutions for Decreasing Burnout and Increasing Job Satisfaction and Performance”. | To investigate how the eco-friendly nature of hotels influences job satisfaction and employees’ performance. | Employees in eco-friendly hotels. | Green environment has a positive impact on reduction in burnout in employees and has a significant effect on job satisfaction and job performance of employees. | South Korea |
Kapoor et al. (2022) [37] | Effectiveness of Travel Social Media Influencers: A Case of Eco-Friendly Hotels. | To understand the role of social media influencers (SMIs) for influencing travelers’ perceptions toward a hotel’s commitment to sustainability and their intention to stay at the eco-friendly hotel. | Social media users | The findings indicates when eco-friendly hotels sponsor SMIs, an attribute-value message is more effective than a simple recommendation message in influencing travelers’ perceptions and intentions. | China |
Park and Kang (2022) [38] | “The Mediating Role of Eco-Friendly Artwork for Urban Hotels to Attract Environmental Educated Consumers”. | Investigating the role of eco-friendly artwork for attracting environmentally educated consumers to visit eco-friendly hotels. | South Korean consumers | Customers’ green perceptions and their satisfaction toward eco-friendly artwork influence their intention to visit eco-friendly hotels. | South Korean |
Abdou et al. (2022) [42] | “The Effect of Environmentally Sustainable Practices on Customer Citizenship Behaviour in Eco-Friendly Hotels: Does the Green Perceived Value Matter?” | To examine the effect of environmentally sustainable practices on customer citizenship behavior in a sample of five-star eco-friendly hotels in Egypt. | Guests in eco-friendly hotels | Environmentally sustainable practices significantly and positively affect green perceived value and customer citizenship behavior. | Egypt |
Kokkhangplu et al. (2023) [40] | “What Predicts Behavioural Intention in Eco-Friendly Hotels? The Roles of Tourist’s Perceived Value and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Thailand” | Investigating the relationship between eco-friendly perceived value, tourist satisfaction, and behavioral intention to revisit eco-friendly hotels in Thailand. | Tourists | Perceived value and tourist satisfaction have a significant association to revisit intention for eco-friendly hotels in Thailand. | Thailand |
Salah et al. (2023) [39] | “Power of e-WOM and Its Antecedents in Driving Customers’ Intention to Revisit: An Empirical Investigation on Five-Star Eco-Friendly Hotels in Saudi Arabia”. | To understand how perceived quality, positive emotional experience, and customer satisfaction influences electronic word-of-mouth and revisit intention in eco-friendly hotels. | Tourists | Perceived quality and positive emotional experience generate electronic word-of-mouth intention and revisit intention in eco-friendly hotels. | Saudi Arabia |
Total Number of Participants (N = 277) | Description | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 70 | 25 |
Female | 207 | 75 | |
Age (Years) | 17–25 | 42 | 15 |
26–35 | 126 | 46 | |
36–45 | 98 | 35 | |
Above 45 | 11 | 4 | |
Education (Completed) | Secondary | 0 | 0 |
Diploma | 0 | 0 | |
Undergraduate | 42 | 15 | |
Postgraduate | 235 | 85 | |
Occupation | Unemployed | 51 | 18 |
Part-time work | 9 | 3 | |
Full-time work | 214 | 77 | |
Own business | 3 | 2 | |
Others | 0 | 0 | |
Monthly Family Income | Less than BDT 30,000 | 27 | 10 |
BDT 30,000 to 40,000 | 28 | 10 | |
BDT 40,000 to 50,000 | 41 | 15 | |
BDT 50,000 to 60,000 | 44 | 16 | |
Above BDT 70,000 | 137 | 49 | |
Did you stay at an eco-friendly hotel previously? | Yes | 277 | 100 |
No | 0 | 0 |
Constructs | Items | Loadings | CA | Rho_A | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revisit intention | RVI1 | 0.901 | 0.879 | 0.880 | 0.926 | 0.807 |
RVI2 | 0.932 | |||||
RVI3 | 0.860 | |||||
Willingness to pay a premium | WTPP1 | 0.815 | 0.744 | 0.748 | 0.854 | 0.662 |
WTPP2 | 0.776 | |||||
WTPP3 | 0.848 | |||||
Word-of-mouth intention | WOMI1 | 0.832 | 0.761 | 0.858 | 0.855 | 0.665 |
WOMI2 | 0.715 | |||||
WOMI3 | 0.891 | |||||
Satisfaction | SAT1 | 0.843 | 0.870 | 0.870 | 0.911 | 0.720 |
SAT2 | 0.876 | |||||
SAT3 | 0.823 | |||||
SAT4 | 0.852 | |||||
Service quality | SQ1 | 0.875 | 0.896 | 0.899 | 0.928 | 0.762 |
SQ2 | 0.891 | |||||
SQ3 | 0.846 | |||||
SQ4 | 0.880 | |||||
Green practice | GP1 | 0.907 | 0.885 | 0.887 | 0.929 | 0.813 |
GP2 | 0.913 | |||||
GP3 | 0.886 | |||||
Perceived value | PV1 | 0.875 | 0.867 | 0.868 | 0.919 | 0.791 |
PV2 | 0.915 | |||||
PV3 | 0.877 | |||||
Environmental sensitivity | ENS1 | 0.821 | 0.896 | 0.897 | 0.928 | 0.763 |
ENS2 | 0.894 | |||||
ENS3 | 0.895 | |||||
ENS4 | 0.881 |
ENS | GP | PV | RVI | SAT | SQ | WOMI | WTPP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENS | ||||||||
GP | 0.786 | |||||||
PV | 0.852 | 0.845 | ||||||
RVI | 0.738 | 0.631 | 0.652 | |||||
SAT | 0.885 | 0.817 | 0.849 | 0.753 | ||||
SQ | 0.823 | 0.812 | 0.848 | 0.740 | 0.883 | |||
WOMI | 0.753 | 0.721 | 0.626 | 0.634 | 0.681 | 0.776 | ||
WTPP | 0.763 | 0.729 | 0.746 | 0.732 | 0.809 | 0.839 | 0.566 |
Hypothesis | Relationship | β | Sample Mean (M) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | T Statistics (|O/STDEV|) | p-Values | Confidence Interval | Results | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5% | 97.5% | ||||||||
H1 | SQ → SAT | 0.277 | 0.278 | 0.082 | 3.361 | 0.001 | 0.117 | 0.438 | Yes |
H2 | GP → SAT | 0.181 | 0.181 | 0.063 | 2.867 | 0.004 | 0.058 | 0.304 | Yes |
H3 | PV → SAT | 0.177 | 0.178 | 0.061 | 2.878 | 0.004 | 0.059 | 0.297 | Yes |
H4 | ENS → SAT | 0.293 | 0.292 | 0.073 | 3.995 | 0.000 | 0.147 | 0.432 | Yes |
H5 | SAT → RVI | 0.659 | 0.660 | 0.037 | 17.711 | 0.000 | 0.583 | 0.729 | Yes |
H6 | SAT → WTPP | 0.734 | 0.736 | 0.030 | 24.395 | 0.000 | 0.674 | 0.791 | Yes |
H7 | SAT → WOMI | 0.599 | 0.602 | 0.037 | 16.281 | 0.000 | 0.524 | 0.671 | Yes |
Item | PLS (RMSE) | LM (RMSE) | PLS-LM | Q2_Predict |
---|---|---|---|---|
RVI1 | 1.025 | 1.039 | −0.014 | 0.376 |
RVI2 | 0.967 | 0.975 | −0.008 | 0.414 |
RVI3 | 1.086 | 1.135 | −0.049 | 0.295 |
SAT1 | 0.913 | 0.923 | −0.010 | 0.455 |
SAT2 | 0.911 | 0.942 | −0.031 | 0.494 |
SAT3 | 0.820 | 0.834 | −0.014 | 0.554 |
SAT4 | 0.833 | 0.858 | −0.025 | 0.484 |
WOMI1 | 0.955 | 0.974 | −0.019 | 0.308 |
WOMI2 | 1.168 | 1.182 | −0.014 | 0.118 |
WOMI3 | 0.885 | 0.851 | 0.034 | 0.426 |
WTPP1 | 1.113 | 1.135 | −0.026 | 0.308 |
WTPP2 | 1.111 | 1.139 | −0.028 | 0.228 |
WTPP3 | 1.032 | 1.023 | 0.009 | 0.408 |
Configurations | Raw Coverage | Unique Coverage | Consistency |
---|---|---|---|
Visitors’ satisfaction towards eco-friendly hotel = f (ENS1, GP1, PV1, SQ1) Algorithm: Quine–McCluskey | |||
ENS*~GP | 0.625439 | 0.00609469 | 0.913403 |
PV*~SQ | 0.613752 | 0.0074569 | 0.914725 |
GP*PV | 0.828063 | 0.0203629 | 0.930996 |
ENS*SQ | 0.850505 | 0.033412 | 0.931303 |
~ENS*GP*~SQ | 0.572381 | 0.00494742 | 0.916322 |
~GP*~PV*SQ | 0.572381 | 0.00444561 | 0.91748 |
solution coverage: 0.945365 | |||
solution consistency: 0.857171 |
Antecedents | Consistency | Coverage |
---|---|---|
ENS | 0.893095 | 0.885288 |
GP | 0.879114 | 0.884186 |
PV | 0.885925 | 0.887771 |
SQ | 0.898544 | 0.894567 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chang, R.; Chanda, R.C.; Vafaei-Zadeh, A.; Hanifah, H.; Gui, A. Assessing Green Practices on Eco-Friendly Hotel Customer Loyalty: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Hybrid Approach. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093834
Chang R, Chanda RC, Vafaei-Zadeh A, Hanifah H, Gui A. Assessing Green Practices on Eco-Friendly Hotel Customer Loyalty: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Hybrid Approach. Sustainability. 2024; 16(9):3834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093834
Chicago/Turabian StyleChang, Ruiqi, Razib Chandra Chanda, Ali Vafaei-Zadeh, Haniruzila Hanifah, and Anderes Gui. 2024. "Assessing Green Practices on Eco-Friendly Hotel Customer Loyalty: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Hybrid Approach" Sustainability 16, no. 9: 3834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093834
APA StyleChang, R., Chanda, R. C., Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Hanifah, H., & Gui, A. (2024). Assessing Green Practices on Eco-Friendly Hotel Customer Loyalty: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Hybrid Approach. Sustainability, 16(9), 3834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093834