Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Furniture Design for Rural Tourist Accommodation Inspired by the Heritage of Istria
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial and Temporal Variation Characteristics of Vegetation Cover in the Tarim River Basin, China, and Analysis of the Driving Factors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

How Are Travel E-Commerce Platforms Becoming Sustainable? A Discrete Choice Experiment Based on the Technology Acceptance Preferences of Elderly Tourists

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1416; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041416
Submission received: 4 January 2025 / Revised: 25 January 2025 / Accepted: 6 February 2025 / Published: 9 February 2025

Abstract

:
The technology acceptance preferences of elderly tourists is one of the important factors influencing their continuous use of tourism e-commerce platforms and promoting the sustainable development of tourism e-commerce platforms. The current tourism market continues to expand within the elderly population. Further, the internet has become the primary channel for tourists’ online consumption in the digital age. This study aims to explore the technology acceptance preferences of elderly tourists for tourism e-commerce platforms, considering active aging and its influence by constructing two adaptation to aging scenarios for tourism e-commerce platforms composed of technology acceptance attributes. Using experimental data from 94 elderly tourists in Nanjing, a mixed logit regression analysis was conducted to explore the characteristics and personalized differences in the respondents’ technology acceptance preferences while using tourism e-commerce platforms. The study found that information access, information understanding, information protection policy and privacy protection technology have a significant positive impact on the consumption preference of elderly tourists. Among them, in the scenario without adaptation to aging, the order of the variables which influence the consumption preferences of elderly tourists online is information access, privacy protection policy, information understanding and privacy protection technology, which reflects the current demand of elderly tourists for easy access to effective information and strong privacy protection. In the context of adaptation to aging, the order is privacy protection policy, information understanding, information access and privacy protection technology, which shows that in the context of improved information access and understanding, elderly people pay more attention to the privacy protection provided by the platform. Moreover, there is individual heterogeneity in elderly tourists’ preferences for the technology acceptance of tourism e-commerce platforms. With the aging population and the digital processes, exploring the influencing factors of elderly tourists’ internet technology acceptance preferences is helpful in promoting the sustainable development of tourism e-commerce platforms in the era of active aging, bridging the digital divide and providing decision support for the practice of an active aging strategy.

1. Introduction

The number of people over the age of 60 in China reached 297 million at the end of 2023, making China the country with the largest elderly population in the world and with the world’s largest market for elderly tourists, according to the National Bulletin on the Development of Aging Undertakings. According to the 53rd statistical report on the development of the Internet in China, in 2023, online travel bookings in China exceeded 454 million, making it becoming the most important travel booking channel for tourists. However, the research shows that people aged 60 years old and above have the lowest Internet usage rate, and technological advancements have brought challenges to society, particularly for the elderly population [1,2]. As individuals age and their cognitive abilities deteriorate, their ability to obtain information, understand content and identify privacy risks declines significantly, which seriously hinders their acceptance of travel service platforms [1]. Tourism e-commerce platforms (or online travel agents, OTA) refer to enterprises that provide tourism products and services through the Internet. Users can book hotels, airline tickets and vacations through these platforms [3]. This is a new form of business in the tourism industry which has emerged in the Internet era. To actively cope with the aging population, travel e-commerce platforms, such as Ctrip and Feizhu, have launched age-appropriate pages for elderly tourists in an attempt to lower the technology acceptance barriers for elderly tourists on the Internet. However, there remains a lack of accurate measurements and assessment of elderly tourists’ experiences of the age-appropriate transformation of travel e-commerce platforms. It has also failed to systematically explore what factors affect the effect of the age-appropriate transformation of the tourism e-commerce platform. Therefore, the conclusions of the existing research cannot fully reveal the influence mechanism of elderly tourists’ Internet technology acceptance preference. Thus, it is difficult to effectively guide the tourism e-commerce platform to implement adaptation to aging and upgrades to effectively improve and protect the digital and intelligent experiences of elderly tourists.
Currently, online reservation platforms are faced with the coexistence of rapid macro-growth and a micro-service lag [4,5]. Although Ctrip, Feizhu and Qunar have all launched age-appropriate APP pages for elderly tourists, adaptations still remain restricted to the level of enlarging fonts and simplifying operations, thereby failing to improve and ensure the digital and intelligent experience of elderly tourists according to the level of technology acceptance of elderly tourists. Many scholars have conducted extensive studies on the Internet use behaviors of elderly tourists, and found that factors such as individual characteristics, technical facilities, psychological state and social environment significantly affect the online bookings, online comments and other Internet behaviors of elderly tourists [6,7,8]. However, there remains a lack of accurate assessment of elderly tourists’ preferences for technology acceptance on tourism e-commerce service platforms. There is still no systematic research on the factors that affect the aging adaptation of the tourism e-commerce service platforms. Consequently, the existing research conclusions cannot fully reveal the influence mechanism of elderly tourists’ Internet technology acceptance preference behavior, and nor can they effectively guide the tourism e-commerce platforms to implement adaptation to aging and upgrades.
The contradiction between the growing travel demands of elderly tourists and the expanding digital divide has become a key factor restricting their tourism decision-making and tourism experience [9,10]. Accelerating the tourism e-commerce platforms’ adaptation to the aging population is important for the development of the silver tourism market. The technology acceptance model is widely used to detect users’ acceptance of emerging technologies, and demonstrates strong predictive ability [11,12]. A large number of researchers have paid attention to the research on online tourism platform user behavior. Most of the research activities have been analyzed through the platform technical indicators, and the technology acceptance model is one of the widely used models [9,10,13]. As a digitally vulnerable group, elderly people have serious technical anxiety and low self-efficacy. It is urgent to study their preferences for the technology acceptance of tourism e-commerce platforms. However, there is a lack of online travel booking research for the elderly population, so this paper innovatively opens up a new research perspective on the elderly population and broadens the technology acceptance model to the field of travel e-commerce, taking Nanjing as a case study, constructing research variables from three dimensions: perceived ease of use (information acquisition); perceived usefulness (information understanding); and perceived risk (privacy protection policy, privacy protection technology and privacy settings). Then, it employs discrete choice experimental methods to explore different scenarios of adaptation to aging and non-adaptation to aging. The influence of various combinations of attributes on elderly tourists’ preferences for Internet technology acceptance and the heterogeneity analysis based on individual characteristics will reveal elderly tourists’ acceptance of technology for the age-appropriate transformation of tourism e-commerce platforms. This influence mechanism will enrich the theoretical research on elderly tourists’ preferences for Internet tourism technology acceptance in the age of digital intelligence. The study also aims to provide practical guidance for the age-appropriate transformation of tourism e-commerce platforms in the background context of aging populations.

2. Literature Review and Model Construction

2.1. Technology Acceptance Model

The technology acceptance model contains four key variables: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, usage attitude and behavioral intention [13]. It is widely used to detect users’ acceptance of emerging technologies, and demonstrates strong predictive ability [11,12]. While conducting research on the elderly population, some researchers found that perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are the two most critical influencing factors when studying the influences on elderly people, and perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness have become emerging as the key factors affecting the acceptance of digital technologies by the elderly population [14,15,16,17]. Hence, according to the characteristics of the tourism e-commerce platform and the elderly population, information acquisition and information understanding are, respectively, included in the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. In recent years, the frequent phenomenon of tourism e-commerce platforms forcibly demanding users’ rights and the excessive collection of personal information have caused people to have many doubts and worries when they are asked to authorize privacy policy consent. Therefore, scholars have incorporated perceived risk factors to expand the technology acceptance model, and highlighted that the perceived risks of the Internet for elderly people have a negative impact on their behavioral intentions [18,19]. Especially for elderly tourists, the risks of unsafe payment transactions, personal privacy disclosure and information abuse have seriously hindered the willingness of elderly tourists to accept tourism e-commerce platforms [5]. The privacy threat model for elderly people classifies the harmful activities that may lead to privacy risks for elderly people, and classifies the strategies for alleviating the privacy risk of elderly people into passive strategies and active strategies [6]. Some elderly people actively set their own privacy protections, while others do not adopt any privacy protection strategies, or passively accept the privacy protection provided by the platform in terms of policies and technologies. Hence, this study subdivides perceived risk into privacy protection technology, privacy protection policy and privacy settings.
In summary, combining the particularity of the research context and the research objective of this study based on the technology acceptance model, the factors affecting the elderly tourists’ acceptance preference for the network technology of the tourism e-commerce platform are divided into information acquisition; information understanding; privacy protection policy; privacy protection technology and privacy settings, and included in age-appropriate and non-age-appropriate transformation scenarios. Then, a theoretical model for this study is constructed.

2.2. Information Acquisition

Information acquisition refers to the degree of matching between the information provided by the tourism e-commerce platform and the conditions of elderly tourists; that is, whether they can clearly understand the interface content and select the desired products, including clear sight and hearing [20]. Increasing age causes memory, reactions and other physical functions to diminish commensurately. Therefore, the use of apps by elderly people could lead to less efficient information acquisition, resulting in a lack of confidence in their own access to new technologies, information literacy and the physiological function of their abilities, directly affecting their perception of the usefulness of the system and ease of access to information [20]. Technical support can appropriately relieve technical anxiety among elderly people, enhance their confidence and enthusiasm about Internet use and improve their perceived accessibility to information [21]. For example, sound can compensate for visual interaction effects and improve the availability of age-appropriate products. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1. 
Elderly tourists prefer e-commerce tourism platforms that provide easy access to information.

2.3. Information Understanding

With the rapid development of modern science and technology, the app interface and function design are becoming increasingly complex, meeting the diversified needs of the younger generation while forgetting the requirements of elderly people. The highly professional presentation of information hinders complete understanding, and most older people are used to judging the acquired information based on their own experience and subjective consciousness, lacking the ability of scientific identification [22]. Consequently, it is difficult to understand and distinguish between the various functions of an app, leading to restricted understanding and cognition [23]. Other research revealed that the greater the knowledge, experience and ability of individuals, the stronger their perception and understanding of information [24]. However, owing to the deterioration of psychological and physiological skills in various aspects, elderly people are vulnerable in the network environment. They lack the ability to understand and discriminate information published by media networks and can easily become disseminators and victims of rumors. If the cognition of intelligent products does not match that of elderly users, cognitive friction may arise, hindering their acquisition and understanding of information [25]. However, the content of privacy policies in apps cannot be correctly understood by ordinary users because of their professionalism and complexity [26]. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 2. 
Elderly tourists prefer easy-to-understand e-commerce tourism platforms.

2.4. Privacy Protection Policy, Privacy Protection Technology and Privacy Settings

Privacy protection policy refers to the liability and obligation of the app operator to protect the legitimate rights and interests of personal information, as well as the disclaimer of information disclosure not caused by the reasons associated with the app, formulated in the process of collecting, sharing and using personal information [27]. For example, the travel e-commerce app requires access to users’ phone numbers, reservation records, etc. The privacy policy of the app should explain why it is necessary to access this information and how to analyze data to help users improve their travel experience, explaining how data are encrypted and stored in the cloud and how users delete or export their own data. It should also outline the circumstances under which anonymous data will be shared with partners. When users perceive that the privacy policy of a website is clear and easy to understand, they are more likely to have privacy perception and control, lowering their perceived privacy risk [28]. Most of the time, users are unaware of the use of personal private information and passively provide “consent” in the policy column to hand over private data [29]. When service providers have fair procedures to protect private information, users are more likely to disclose personal information to them [28].
Privacy protection technology refers to the protective measures adopted by app providers to prevent users’ information from being improperly obtained [30], including encryption technology for setting keys, identity authentication technology such as fingerprint and face recognition and controlling access to sensitive information. Nowadays, users are paying more attention to the privacy of their personal information; mobile service providers have noticed this demand and have provided more privacy protection technologies [31]. The higher the level of privacy protection technology, the higher the user’s privacy perception and control [32]. Effective privacy protection technology positively affects the perceived control of personal privacy information, reducing the degree of perceived risk [33].
The above privacy protection policies and technologies are passive privacy security management measures, while privacy settings—that is, a series of configurations or options used in personal applications to control and manage visibility and access to personal information—are proactive protection measures. Users make their own decisions regarding which information to publicize or protect and who can access it. This includes the ability to view, modify and delete personal information; and manage notifications and marketing information. Research has shown that privacy settings improve users’ perceived privacy controls [34]. Some elderly people are out of touch with the information age and are unable to navigate registration management and privacy settings, which not only reduces their sense of control but also undermines their confidence in using emerging technologies [35]. Therefore, they need social support to help them complete privacy-related settings [20]. Therefore, the following hypotheses are proposed:
Hypothesis 3. 
Elderly tourists prefer tourism e-commerce platforms with clearer privacy policies.
Hypothesis 4. 
Elderly tourists prefer tourism e-commerce platforms with effective privacy protection technologies.
Hypothesis 5. 
Elderly tourists prefer tourism e-commerce platforms with auxiliary privacy setting functions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Research Methods

This study employed a discrete choice experimental model to analyze the technology acceptance preference mechanism of elderly tourists on a tourism e-commerce platform. The discrete choice experiment (DCE) is based on the stochastic utility theory [36], which assumes that decision-makers always pursue the option that maximizes utility when making choices, and was further extended by McFadden [37,38]. The discrete choice experiment is a multi-factor variable analysis method used to measure and quantify the behavior of decision makers, weighing options and making the optimal choice under multiple attributes and levels. It can comprehensively analyze the preferences of decision-makers regarding the characteristics of goods or services. It is primarily used to explain choice scenarios involving a limited, mutually exclusive set of options. Over the years, modeling methods, data collection, estimation algorithms, prediction methods and other aspects of discrete choice models have been further developed and improved, in terms of breadth and depth, by many scholars [39,40,41,42], gradually becoming one of the most powerful tools for studying individual choice behavior. With the increasing complexity of research problems and increasingly sophisticated model settings, a series of relatively complete theoretical systems have been constructed for discrete choice models, which have been widely used in various fields, such as tourism [43]. The specific research ideas are presented in Figure 1.

3.2. Construction of the Hybrid Logit Model

A traditional logit model assumes homogeneous individual preferences. However, research proves that individual preferences for commodities are heterogeneous [44]. The mixed logit model (MXL) assumes that individual preferences are heterogeneous and continuously distributed, allows for random errors, has high flexibility and has been widely used in selection experiments in recent years [37]. Based on this, a mixed logit model was used to analyze data from discrete selection experiments. In the mixed logit model presented in this paper, the linear expression of the deterministic term V n i t is:
V n i t = I A n i β 1 + I C n i β 2 + P P n i β 3 + P T n i β 4 + P S n i β 5 + ε
where I A , I C , P P , P T , P S respectively represent information acquisition, information understanding, privacy protection policy, privacy protection technology and privacy settings, and β1–β5 are the coefficients of each attribute variable, respectively. The attribute level assignment and description can be seen in Table 1.

3.3. Research Scenario and Questionnaire Design

Since every choice is made by consumers under a certain decision-making background, according to the constructive choice view, consumers’ choices and decisions are highly dependent on the scenario (such as market economy, technology, natural disasters and major changes in the political system) [45,48], and consequently, the relative preference and value measurement of tourism e-commerce platforms may be different. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the decision-making situation of experimental designs and further test the role of situational factors in individual choice. Adaptation to aging is one of the important factors that affect elderly tourists’ choice of digital technologies [46,47]. But at present, only a few tourism platform studies have taken situational factors into account. This hinders the aging transformation of tourism e-commerce platforms. Therefore, this study is divided into two scenarios, i.e., adaptation to aging and without adaptation to aging, in order to promote the adaptation to aging of tourism e-commerce platforms and improve the utilization rate of elderly tourists.
A questionnaire survey was used to collect data. The questionnaire was divided into two main parts. The first part included demographic characteristics, including age, gender and education level. The second part comprised the declarative selection experiment, which was divided into two scenarios: a tourism e-commerce platform without age-appropriate transformation, and a tourism e-commerce platform after age-appropriate transformation. Each scenario contained a five-point Likert scale related to attribute evaluation after using the app, with scores from one to five, respectively, representing the range from “very unimportant” to “very important”. Respondents selected the corresponding scores according to their real feelings, and in the four choice sets, they chose the corresponding options according to their preferences. This study included five attributes, each with two levels, in the discrete choice model questionnaire. If the attribute levels were fully combined, 32 attribute combinations of 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 could be generated, but these lacked the conditions required to conduct the selection experiment. To ensure the scientific validity and feasibility of the selection experiment, this study implemented an orthogonal experimental design using the %choicEff macro. First, the %MktRuns macro program was used to output the recommended size of the choice set. The results show that running eight times is sufficient to saturate the design (i.e., eight choice sets). Then, the %MktEx macro program was used to generate an orthogonal design as the candidate set. Next, the %choicEff macro program randomly constructed an initial design from the candidate set and replaced each scheme in the initial design with the candidate set until the design efficiency stabilized at the maximum value, and then output the optimal design (see Table 2 for examples of selection experiments). Each selection consisted of two different combinations of e-commerce tourism platform options with different attribute levels. This scheme enabled the questionnaire to more accurately simulate the choice situation of elderly tourists. In the two suitable aging situations, respondents were required to make a total of 16 choices; an example of the choice set is shown in the table. The specific questionnaire can be seen in Appendix A.
In order to test the rationality of the experimental design, a pre-experiment was conducted on the Internet and around the school for the elderly before the formal survey. In the interview, elderly people generally reflected that in the process of using the tourism e-commerce platform, the difficulty of information understanding, access and privacy disclosure risks, such as payment, were the key determinants of whether they would continue to use the platform, which was consistent with the research questionnaire designed in this paper. And most elderly people could understand the rich and clear content of the questionnaire design and fill it in smoothly. Considering that the survey group consisted of elderly tourists, the research team visited the Nanjing Xuanwu Lake scenic spot, the main destination of the most significantly represented elderly tourists, to conduct the survey from 30 September to 3 October 2024. Elderly tourists with online booking experience were investigated by the convenience sampling method. A total of 101 questionnaires were received, and 94 valid responses were obtained after excluding invalid and missing ones. The efficacy rate was 93%. Due to the limited resources of the respondents in this survey, and based on the sample size calculation formula proposed by Johnson and Orne [49], which is the most widely used formula at present, N 500 L m a x J S (where L m a x represents the maximum number of levels of attributes, J represents the number of options for each selection and S represents the number of selection sets to be completed by the respondents), it was calculated that the minimum sample size in this paper should be 31, indicating that the number of samples collected met the required conditions. Most respondents were aged 50–65 years, lived in cities or towns and had a general understanding of age-appropriate tourism e-commerce platforms. The descriptive statistics of the samples are shown in Table 3.

4. Research Results

Because the discrete selection experiment used a long-form format and the paper questionnaire was entered in a wide form, the wide data needed to be converted into long data before the analysis. After the conversion, Stata software (version 16.0) was used to perform a fitting analysis of the discrete choice model for the data of elderly users’ technical acceptance preferences for e-commerce platforms.

4.1. Preference Analysis in Different Situations

4.1.1. Elderly Tourists’ Preference for Attributes of Tourism E-Commerce Platforms

Stata 17.0 software was used to fit the mixed logit model, with a total of 1488 selected data points from 94 valid questionnaires. The estimated results are presented in Table 4 and Table 5. From the model estimate, the log likelihood was −775.71514 and −722.3932 and the LR Chi22(6) was 78.72 and 129.61, respectively, and the Prob > Chi of the result of the invalid hypothesis test of the model was 0.0000. This indicated that the overall fitting degree of the model was good, its validity was high and the model setting was reasonable.
In the non-age-appropriate modification scenario, the regression coefficients of all variables, except privacy settings, passed the significance test and were positive, indicating that elderly tourists showed positive preferences for the four attributes, information acquisition; information understanding; privacy protection policy and privacy protection technology, which were conducive to improving their utility levels. The coefficients were ranked from largest to smallest as follows: information access (β = 1.756) > privacy policy (β = 0.796) > information understanding (β = 0.698) > privacy technology (β = 0.110). The greater the absolute value of the coefficient, the greater the marginal utility that elderly tourists could obtain from this attribute. This reflects the degree of influence of each attribute on the final choice decisions of elderly users. The analysis results show that, compared with other groups of users, the audiovisual, cognitive, expressive and operational abilities of elderly users constantly weaken, and they are more likely to be unable to predict privacy risks due to a lack of judgment ability [50]. Therefore, they pay more attention to whether the information presented by the platform can be accessed normally and correctly understood, and whether its privacy protection is clear and effective. This also reflects that current travel e-commerce platforms, which have not been adapted for aging, generally include problems such as small size, unclear fonts, complex interfaces and unsatisfactory audio–visual interaction effects.
In the context of age-appropriate transformation, information acquisition and understanding, as well as privacy protection policy and technology, were all significantly positive. This indicates that, in this context, elderly tourists demonstrate a positive preference for these four attributes, and the improvement in each attribute level increases the possibility of their acceptance of network technology, which also confirms Hypotheses 1–4 (Table 6). This conclusion reveals the current phenomenon that elderly tourists are sensitive to privacy and security due to the decline in their physical function, and they are more cautious about the cognition and attitude of emerging Internet technologies, deepening the application of CPM theory and role theory in the field of tourism. The coefficients in descending order are as follows: privacy protection policy (β = 1.819) > information understanding (β = 1.779) > information access (β = 0.940) > privacy protection technology (β = 0.284). The current age-appropriate e-commerce platform has basically achieved a simple interface, bold font display, enlarged size and clear and easy-to-understand explanations. However, some platforms have ignored improvements in privacy protection. Therefore, compared with the situation without age-appropriate transformation, elderly tourists value clear and effective privacy protection policy content in this scenario. The privacy settings were not significant in either scenario, and thus, Hypothesis 5 is not supported. The reason for this may be that at present, many tourism e-commerce platforms, such as Ctrip and Feizhu, have set up privacy protection functions and the process is cumbersome. In addition, studies have indicated that elderly people in China currently lack initiative in online privacy protection and an awareness of the risks of privacy disclosure [51]. This makes many elderly tourists vulnerable and unfairly treated, so it is important to strengthen the operability of privacy settings. However, the design of privacy settings on most platforms is not user-friendly. Even with the auxiliary function of privacy settings, elderly people need to read a large amount of indicative information and carry out multi-step operations, which conflicts with their needs. There are communication barriers between the platform and elderly tourists, which are the key problems to be urgently solved, both in theory and in reality.

4.1.2. Heterogeneity Analysis of Different Individual Characteristic Preferences

In the two scenarios, cross-terms of the demographic characteristic variables of elderly tourists and product attributes were introduced, and the mixed logit model was used for regression (Table 7 and Table 8). From the estimated results of the model, the log likelihood was −1855.0617, LR Chi2 (35) was 640.38, and the Prob > Chi of the test result of the invalid hypothesis of the model was 0.000. This indicates that the model had a better overall fitting degree.
In the scenario without age-appropriate modification, gender and age influenced the attribute preference of tourism souvenirs among the cross-terms of attributes and individual characteristic variables. However, the interaction terms of education level, average monthly income, occupation and the attributes of tourism e-commerce platforms were not significant, which is similar to the situation in the overall age-appropriate modification scenario. This indicates that education level and occupation are not the sources of heterogeneity in Internet technology acceptance attribute preference, and that there is no significant difference in Internet technology acceptance preference among elderly tourists with different education levels and occupations. The specific manifestations are as follows.
The interaction effect between gender and information acquisition was significantly negative, and that between gender and privacy settings was negative and insignificant. This indicates that for platforms that are not suitable for aging transformation, men prefer platforms with rich interfaces, complete functions and independent privacy settings according to their own needs, whereas women value the simplicity of information acquisition and the auxiliary functions of privacy settings.
The effects of age, information acquisition, information understanding and privacy protection technology were significantly positive, indicating that older adult tourists are more inclined to choose tourism e-commerce platforms with high perceived ease of use, high perceived usefulness and effective privacy protection technology. Some researchers have also proven that older people tend to choose easily accessible tourism information [21].
The average monthly income of elderly tourists in the adaptation to the aging scenario had a significant positive effect on information acquisition, privacy protection technology and privacy settings. This may be because older individuals with money and leisure pursue spiritual abundance, travel relatively frequently and use tourism e-commerce platforms more often. They are more inclined to use tourism e-commerce platforms with convenient information acquisition, guaranteed privacy and specific privacy settings according to their needs to ensure the security of personal information and payment accounts.

5. Discussion and Conclusions

5.1. Theoretical Discussion

Starting from the difference in preferences for Internet technology acceptance in two situations, this study conducted an offline survey of elderly tourists. Based on the discrete choice experiment method and hybrid logit model, it explored elderly tourists’ preferences for Internet technology acceptance in tourism e-commerce platforms in different situations and further analyzed individual heterogeneity according to the individual characteristics of elderly users. The main conclusions are as follows.
Information acquisition, information understanding, privacy protection policy and privacy protection technology have significant positive effects on elderly tourists’ Internet technology acceptance preferences, regardless of whether the tourism e-commerce platform is retrofitted for aging. Hypotheses 1–4 were verified. This finding further demonstrates the applicability of the technology acceptance model to elderly tourists, indicating that perceived ease of use, usefulness and risk are key variables affecting elderly tourists’ acceptance of Internet technology. However, the influence of privacy settings on elderly tourists’ Internet technology acceptance preferences was not significant in either scenario. Privacy settings refer to elderly tourists’ initiatives to protect themselves against the potential risks of tourism e-commerce platforms. Considering the current digital literacy of the elderly population in China and the specific design of privacy settings on tourism e-commerce platforms, it can be observed that elderly tourists have relatively weak awareness of privacy disclosure risk and privacy protection initiatives, and their digital literacy is relatively low. Additionally, although most tourism e-commerce platforms provide privacy settings during adaptation, the operation process is too complicated, resulting in elderly tourists often giving up or directly ignoring the implementation of effective privacy protection behaviors in real life. This study reveals the shortcomings of current tourism e-commerce platforms in their adaptation to aging, filling the gap in existing literature, which mostly focuses on the technical acceptance of intelligent information by elderly users [52].
The influence mechanism of age-appropriate tourism e-commerce platforms on elderly tourists’ technology acceptance preferences significantly differs from that of general tourism e-commerce platforms. In the absence of age-appropriate transformation, the order of the degree of influence of various attributes of tourism e-commerce platforms on the technology acceptance preference of elderly tourists, from high to low, is as follows: information acquisition, privacy protection policy, information understanding and privacy protection technology. Elderly tourists focus more on how to obtain information about unmodified tourism e-commerce platforms, which verifies the research conclusions of some researchers [53]. However, compared with other groups concerned about understanding information, elderly people are concerned about privacy protection policies, indicating that they attach importance to privacy risk disclosure. After the age-appropriate transformation, the degree of influence of various attributes of tourism e-commerce platforms on elderly tourists’ technology acceptance preferences changed from high to low as follows: privacy protection policy, information understanding, information access and privacy protection technology. After the aging transformation, tourism e-commerce platforms place more emphasis on the protection of the privacy of elderly tourists, so that the latter pay more attention to personal privacy, which is a significant protection for them, echoing laws and regulations and reflecting society’s love and care for digitally vulnerable groups.
The choice preferences of elderly tourists are heterogeneous, and their choice of tourism e-commerce platform is affected by individual characteristics such as gender, age and average monthly income. In the context of non-age-appropriate transformation, gender and age have interactive effects on information acquisition, with age also having interactive effects on information understanding and privacy protection technologies. Specifically, the older elderly tourists are, the more inclined they are to choose platforms with easier information acquisition and understanding and more effective privacy protection technology. This finding is consistent with the current common Internet needs of elderly people. Compared to women, men are more likely to accept e-commerce platforms with complex interfaces and rich information. Existing studies on elderly users’ needs for intelligent network systems tend to ignore the heterogeneity of elderly users; different values, health conditions and experiences may significantly affect the requirements for intelligent systems [54]. This finding complements the research on elderly tourists’ technology acceptance preferences. In the adaptation to aging scenario, there is an interactive effect between age and information access, and average monthly income has an interactive effect on information access, privacy protection policies and privacy settings. Specifically, older tourists with higher average monthly incomes are more willing to accept a platform with rich information, are less afraid of privacy disclosure and can independently use complex privacy settings. From this, it can be interpreted that wealthy and independent older adults more frequently have a rewarding travel experience using tourism e-commerce platforms; being skilled in relevant operations, they can establish a trusted connection with the platform [55]. This is consistent with the current phenomenon of elderly travel and the strong momentum towards digitalization in our country.
In both scenarios, all factors except for privacy setting attributes—elderly tourists’ preferences for information acquisition, information understanding, privacy protection policy and privacy protection technology—are significant, with positive coefficients. This indicates that these attributes have a greater positive impact on elderly tourists’ technology acceptance decisions, supporting Hypotheses 1–4. The reasons for the lack of significant privacy settings in the two scenarios may be as follows: (1) The complexity of privacy settings does not match the digital literacy of elderly tourists, exceeding their cognitive ability and resulting in difficulties in understanding and operational errors, leading them to abandon the privacy settings. (2) Although elderly tourism e-commerce platforms can only provide auxiliary measures for privacy settings, the guidance fails to meet the needs of older adults. The guidance process and operation guide are too complicated, and elderly users fail to receive timely operational feedback and support, reducing their self-efficacy. Additionally, because privacy settings are proactive protection measures in the perceived risk dimension, the current situation in China also leads to elderly people often suffering from internet fraud and similar problems.

5.2. Practical Implications

Based on the research conclusions, to improve the experience and sense of acquisition of e-commerce platforms for elderly users and enhance the practicability and pertinence of the platform, the following suggestions are proposed:
The physical functions of elderly people and the strength of their perceptions should be fully considered. For instance, travel e-commerce platforms like Ctrip should create an elderly mode, in which they increase the bold display of text; add picture guidance, voice explanations and other auxiliary functions; avoid using vague and lengthy descriptions; refrain from using jargon in the field of privacy protection and retain only necessary content in the interface, to reduce the learning threshold for elderly people.
Secondly, privacy concerns should be eased and platforms should build trust. Tourism e-commerce platforms should follow the example of applications like himarket and display corresponding security marks within the software, such as privacy shields and SSL certificates, and emphasize data security measures, such as encryption algorithms and anonymization processing. This would help older adult users to feel that their information is fully protected, and regular security notifications should be sent to users so that they know where their information is going in a timely manner.
Thirdly, platforms should create an atmosphere that is suitable for the aging population, and enhance the sense of integration among elderly people. This would involve encouraging communities, volunteer organizations and other social forces to participate in the creation of a digitally friendly atmosphere for elderly people, such as building dedicated social platforms for their communication, establishing community interest groups to learn about the use of electronic products and providing appropriate guidance and support. This would strengthen digital literacy education for elderly people, who could improve their understanding and application of digital technologies through community courses and online lectures. Government departments should strengthen the popularization and application of digital technologies in elderly communities, promote the construction of smart communities and enable elderly people to easily use digital technologies in their daily lives.
Finally, the acceptability of technology in tourism e-commerce platforms should be improved for elderly tourists. In the next few years, the government should actively introduce policies for adaptation to aging, and the information and communication industry should hold aging-friendly digital technology activities in various regions. Through rich forms such as fairs and cultural activities, a more friendly, convenient and secure digital environment should be created for elderly people to address their concerns about the usability, ease of use, security, privacy and control of intelligent systems. Bridging the digital divide among elderly people will promote the realization of active aging policies [56,57,58,59].

5.3. Research Prospects

From the perspective of research methods, previous studies have mostly used single- or multi-factor statistical methods to explore the impact of different factors on the satisfaction and behavior of tourism e-commerce platforms, but the relative importance of each factor is often difficult to quantify. This study established an evaluation method for elderly tourists’ Internet technology acceptance preferences that combined a questionnaire survey and a discrete choice experiment. Guided by the stated preferences, selection experiments are at the core, and empirical and experimental methods are combined to measure the preferences of various attributes of tourism e-commerce platforms, providing a new perspective and direction for service providers of tourism e-commerce platforms to adapt to the transformation associated with the aging population. However, this study has some limitations that should be explored in future research. From a methodological perspective, this study focuses on discrete choice experiments. Although real-choice scenarios were presented to respondents as much as possible during the experimental design and data collection process to reduce understanding and answer bias, some elderly respondents may still have comprehension biases and fill in errors. Future studies can further conduct one-to-one explanatory selection experiments and combine them with other experimental methods to measure the physiological and psychological changes in elderly people when using age-adapted travel e-commerce platforms more accurately. From a data perspective, future research could expand the sample selection range, consider differences in results caused by varying tourism scenes and conduct comparative analyses to enhance the universality of the research conclusions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X. and M.Q.; methodology, M.Q.; software, L.X.; validation, L.X.; formal analysis, L.X. and M.Q.; investigation, L.X.; resources, M.Q.; data curation, L.X.; writing—original draft preparation, L.X.; writing—review and editing, L.X. and M.Q.; visualization, L.X.; supervision, M.Q.; project administration, M.Q.; funding acquisition, M.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by [the National Natural Science Foundation of China] ‘Comprehensive Effects and Mechanisms of Multi-dimensional Rehabilitative Landscape in Tourism Destinations’ under grant number [41901174].

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing Forestry University (Date 20/09/24/No.NJFU-20240519027) for studies involving humans.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The questionnaire is a study of the person, and it involves the private information of the person who fills it in, so the original data can not be disclosed and it is also promised in the informed consent form.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to my teacher, Mengyuan Qiu, for her guidance on this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. The Questionnaire Used in This Article

Part 1:
This information is completely confidential.
1. What is your gender? (Please √ check one)
○ Male
○ Female
○ Other
2. How old are you? (Please √ check one)
○ 50–55
○ 56–60
○ 61–65
○ 66–70
○ 71 and above
3. What is your level of education? (Please √ check one)
○ Primary school and below
○ Junior high school
○ Senior high school
○ Junior college
○ College and above
4. Your occupation before retirement. (Please √ check one)
○ Civil servants and public institutions
○ Enterprises
○ Military
○ Self-employed
○ Farming
○ Others
5. Your average monthly income. (Please √ check one)
○ CNY 2000 and below
○ CNY 2001–4000
○ CNY 4001–6000
○ CNY 6001–8000
○ CNY 8000 and above
6. Your usual place of residence
○ Cities and towns
○ Countryside
Part 2:
1. Are you willing to use this kind of travel app that is not suitable for the elderly? ○Yes ○No
2. If yes, how important are the following related attributes to you? Please recall your experience of making a reservation using a travel app that has not been adapted for aging, and evaluate the following attributes. For each of the statements, please indicate the degree to which you think it is true for you by choosing ONE option per statement.
AttributeVery UnimportantUnimportantNeutralityImportantVery Important
Information acquisition12345
Information understanding12345
Policy12345
Privacy-preserving technologies12345
Privacy setting12345
3. There are four selection sets (3.1–3.4), and each selection set contains two travel apps. Please choose your preferred app from each selection set according to the situation of “no age-appropriate transformation”.
Selection Set 3.1
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionEasyDifficult
Information understandingEasyDifficult
PolicyObscureClear
Privacy-preserving technologiesInvalidValid
Privacy settingUnassistedAssisted
Your choice:
Selection set 3.2
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionEasyDifficult
Information understandingEasyDifficult
PolicyObscureClear
Privacy-preserving technologiesInvalidValid
Privacy settingUnassistedAssisted
Your choice:
Selection set 3.3
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionEasyDifficult
Information understandingDifficultEasy
PolicyClearObscure
Privacy-preserving technologiesInvalidValid
Privacy settingUnassistedAssisted
Your choice:
Selection set 3.4
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionEasyDifficult
Information understandingDifficultEasy
PolicyObscureClear
Privacy-preserving technologiesValidInvalid
Privacy settingUnassistedAssisted
4. Please recall a time when you used a travel app that has been modified for aging and rate the importance of the following attributes.
AttributeVery UnimportantUnimportantNeutralityImportantVery Important
Information acquisition12345
Information understanding12345
Policy12345
Privacy-preserving technologies12345
Privacy setting12345
5. There are four choice sets (5.1–5.4), and each choice set contains two aging renovation schemes for travel apps. Please choose the renovation scheme you prefer from each choice set.
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionDifficultEasy
Information understandingEasyDifficult
PolicyClearObscure
Privacy-preserving technologiesInvalidValid
Privacy settingAssistedUnassisted
Your choice:
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionDifficultEasy
Information understandingEasyDifficult
PolicyObscureClear
Privacy-preserving technologiesValidInvalid
Privacy settingUnassistedAssisted
Your choice:
AttributeSection ASection B
Information acquisitionDifficultEasy
Information understandingDifficultEasy
PolicyClearObscure
Privacy-preserving technologiesValidInvalid
Privacy settingUnassistedAssisted
Your choice:

References

  1. Iancu, I.; Iancu, B. Designing mobile technology for elderly. A theoretical overview. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 155, 119–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lee, C. Technology and aging: The jigsaw puzzle of design, development and distribution. Nat. Aging 2022, 2, 1077–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wei, J.; Liu, M.; Li, W.; Hou, Z.; Li, L. The impact of consumer confusion on the service recovery effect of Online Travel Agency (OTA). Curr. Psychol. 2023, 42, 24339–24348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huang, X. Legal Traceability of Information Leakage of Artificial Intelligence Rural E-commerce Shopping Guide Platform Based on Big Data. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1744, 042033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Thora, K.; Xiaojun, Y.; DeeDee, B. Illuminating Privacy and Security Concerns in Older Adults’ Technology Adoption. Work Aging Retire. 2022, 10, 57–60. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yap, Y.; Tan, S.H.; Choons, S.W. Elderly’s intention to use technologies: A systematic literature review. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phang, C.W.; Sutanto, J.; Kankan-halli, A. Senior Citizens’ Acceptance of Information Systems: A Study in the Context of E-Goverment Services. EEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2006, 53, 555–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zeithaml, V.A.; Gilly, M.C. Characteristics Affecting the Accept ce of Retailing Technologies: A Comparison of Elderly and Non erly Consumers. J. Retail. 1987, 63, 49–68. [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlisle, S.; Ivanov, S.; Dijkmans, C. The digital skills divide: Evidence from the European tourism industry. J. Tour. Futures 2023, 9, 240–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Y.B.; Perkins, A. The impact of technological developments on the daily life of the elderly. Technol. Soc. 2007, 29, 361–368. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ferreira, L.; Oliveira, T.; Neves, C. Consumer’sintention to use and recommend smart home technologies: The role of environmental awareness. Energy 2023, 263125, 814. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gansser, O.A.; Reich, C.S. A new acceptancemodel for artificial intelligence with extensions toUTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments ofapplication. Technol. Soc. 2021, 65, 101535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Venkatesh, V.; Davis, F.D. Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Fiel Studies. Manag. Sci. 2000, 46, 186–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ayeh, J.K.; Au, N.; Law, R. Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning. Tour. Manag. 2013, 35, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Belz, B.S.; Zipf, A.; Laumanen, H.; Poslad, S. Location—Based mobile tourist services-first user experiences. In Proceedings of the Information & Communication Technologies in Tourism2003: Proceed in gs of the International Conference in Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 21–24 January 2014; pp. 115–123. [Google Scholar]
  16. Eriksson, N.; Strandvik, P. Possible Determinants Affecting the Use of Mobile Tourism Services. In E-Business and Telecommunications; Filipe, J., Obaidat, M.S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 61–73. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wong, C.K.M.; Yeung, D.Y.; Ho, H.C.Y.; Tse, K.-P.; Lam, C.-Y. Chinese Older Adults’ Internet Use for Health Information. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2014, 33, 316–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rebecca, C.; Indrit, T.; Sally, H.R.; Hoffmann, A. Towards an understanding of consumers’ FinTech adoption: The case of Open Banking. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2022, 40, 886–917. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shin, D.H. Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2009, 25, 1343–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Frik, A.; Nurgalieva, L.; Bernd, J.; Lee, J.; Schaub, F.; Egelman, S. Privacy and Security Threat Models and Mitigation Strategies of Older Adults. In Proceedings of the 15th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS’19, USENIX Assoc), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 11–13 August 2019; pp. 21–40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo, X.; Sun, Y.; Wang, N.; Peng, J.; Yan, Z. The dark side of elderly acceptance of preventive mobile health services in China. Electron. Mark. 2013, 23, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Leicht, J.; Heisel, M. A Survey on Privacy Policy Languages: Expressiveness Concerning Data Protection Regulations. In Proceedings of the 2019 12th CMI Conference on Cybersecurity and Privacy (CMI), Copenhagen, Denmark, 28–29 November 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xavier, A.J.; D’orsi, E.; De Oliveira, C.M.; Orrell, M.; Demakakos, P.; Biddulph, J.P.; Marmot, M.G. English longitudinal Study of Aging: Can Internet/E-mail use reduce cognitive decline? J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014, 69, 1117–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Endsley, M.R. Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement. Proc. Hum. Factors Soc. Annu. Meet. 1988, 32, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, J.Y.W.; Kwan, R.Y.C.; Yin, Y.H.; Lee, P.H.; Siu, J.Y.-M.; Bai, X. Enhancing the Physical Activity Levels of Frail Older Adults with a Wearable Activity Tracker-Based Exercise Intervention: A Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Reinhardt, D.; Borchard, J.; Hurtienne, J. Visual Interactive Privacy Policy: The Better Choice? In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), Yokohama, Japan, 8–13 May 2021; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  27. Haynes, A.W. Online Privacy Policies: Contracting Away Control Over Personal Information? Penn State Law Rev. 2006, 11, 587. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, H.; Sarathy, R.; Xu, H. The role of affect and cognition on online consumers’ decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decis. Support Syst. 2011, 51, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Acquisti, A.; Brandimarte, L.; Loewenstein, G. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information. Science 2015, 347, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Xu, H. Consumer Responses to the Introduction of Privacy Protection Measures: An Exploratory Research Framework. Int. J. E-Bus. Res. (IJEBR) 2009, 5, 21–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Duan, X.Y.; Wang, X.B. Authentication handover and privacy protection in 5G hetnets using software-defined networking. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2015, 53, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, C.; Zheng, Y.F.; Jiang, J.H. Toward privacy-preserving personalized recommendation services. Engineering 2018, 4, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, L.; Sun, Z.; Dai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, H.H. Retaining users after privacy invasions: The roles of institutional privacy assurances and threat-coping appraisal in mitigating privacy concerns. Inf. Technol. People 2019, 32, 1679–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Z.L.; Wang, X.Q. How to regulate individuals’ privacy boundaries on social network sites: A cross-cultural comparison. Inf. Manag. 2018, 55, 1005–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brandtzeg, P.B.; Marika, L.; Skjetne, J.H. Too many Facebook “friends”? content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2010, 26, 1006–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thurstone, L.L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol. Rev. 1927, 34, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. McFadden, D. Conditional logit analysis and subjective probability. In Frontiers in Econometrics; Zarembda, P., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; pp. 105–142. [Google Scholar]
  38. McFadden, D. The choice theory approach to market research. Mark. Sci. 1986, 5, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ben-Akiva, M.; Lerman, S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Applications to Travel Demand; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bhat, C.R. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transp. Res. Part B 2001, 35, 677–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hensher, D.A.; Rose, J.M.; Greene, W.H. Applied Choice Analysis, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  42. Louviere, J.; Hensher, D.; Swait, J. Stated Choice Methods—Analysis and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kuhfeld, F.W.; SAS Company. Multinomial Logit, Discrete Choice Modeling; The university of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2001. Available online: https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~reilly/Choice (accessed on 3 January 2025).
  44. Nguyen, T.T.; Haider, W.; Solgaard, H.S.; Ravn-Jonsen, L.; Roth, E. Consumer willingness to pay for quality attributes of fresh seafood:A labeled latent class model. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 41, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, X.; Wen, D.; Liang, J.; Lei, J. How the public uses social media wechat to obtain health information in china: A survey study. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2017, 17 (Suppl. S2), 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. McKnight, D.H.; Choudhury, V.; Kacmar, C. Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology. Inf. Syst. Res. 2002, 13, 334–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pramod, D. Privacy-preserving techniques in recommender systems: State-of-the-art review and future research agenda. Data Technol. Appl. 2023, 57, 32–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Maoz, D. Backpackers’ motivations the role of culture and nationality. Ann. Tour. Res. 2007, 34, 122–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Johnson, R.; Orme, B.; Getting the Most from CBC. Sawtooth Software Research Paper, 2003, 98382. Available online: https://sawtoothsoftware.com/resources/technical-papers/getting-the-most-from-cbc (accessed on 3 January 2025).
  50. Ball, C.; Francis, J.; Huang, K.-T.; Kadylak, T.; Cotten, S.R.; Rikard, R.V. The physical−digital divide: Exploring the social gap between digital natives and physical natives. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2019, 38, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Anaraky, R.G.; Byrne, K.A.; Wisniewski, P.J.; Page, X.; Knijnenburg, B. To Disclose or Not to Disclose: Examining the Privacy Decision-Making Processes of Older vs. Younger Adults. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 8–13 May 2021; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ghorayeb, A.; Comber, R.; Gooberman-Hill, R. Older adults’ perspectives of smart home technology: Are we developing the technology that older people want? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2021, 147, 102–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ebbers, W.E.; Jansen, M.G.M.; Van Deursen, A. Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Gov. Inf. Q. 2016, 33, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Chu, C.H.; Nyrup, R.; Leslie, K.; Shi, J.; Bianchi, A.; Lyn, A.; McNicholl, M.; Khan, S.; Rahimi, S.; Grenier, A. Digital ageism: Challenges and opportunities in artificial intelligence for older adults. Gerontologist 2022, 62, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Young, R.; Willis, E.; Cameron, G.; Geana, M. “Willing but Unwilling”: Attitudinal barriers to adoption of home-based health information technology among older adults. J. Health Inform. 2014, 20, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Li, W.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Erol, I.; Liu, A. Motivations, barriers and risks of smart home adoption: From systematic literature review to conceptual framework. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 80, 102–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Peek, S.T.; Wouters, E.J.; van Hoof, J.; Luijkx, K.G.; Boeije, H.R.; Vrijhoef, H.J. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review. J. Med. Inform. 2014, 83, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tsertsidis, A.; Kolkowska, E.; Hedstrom, K. Factors influencing seniors’ acceptance of technology for ageing in place in the post-implementation stage: Aliterature review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2019, 129, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zafrani, O.; Nimrod, G.; Edan, Y. Between fearand trust: Older adults’ evaluation of socially assistive robots. Int. J. Hum. -Comput. Stud. 2023, 171, 102–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research model diagram.
Figure 1. Research model diagram.
Sustainability 17 01416 g001
Table 1. Attribute level assignment and description table.
Table 1. Attribute level assignment and description table.
Attribute Variable Attribute Level Attribute DescriptionSource
Information acquisitionEasy/DifficultWhether to take certain measures, such as adjusting the size of the word, voice retrieval, etc., to match the conditions of elderly touristsZhang X; Wen D; Lei J [45]
Information understandingEasy/DifficultWhether to take certain measures such as: sensory compensation (voice explanation, vibration and beeps), one-to-one customer service to improve the comprehensibility and readability of informationLeicht; Jens and Heisel; Maritta [24]
Privacy protection policyClarity/AmbiguityWhether the privacy policy is simple and easy for elderly people to understandD. Harrison McKnight; Vivek Choudhury; Charles Kacmar [46]
Privacy protection technologyValid/InvalidWhether the privacy protection technology provided can effectively protect the rights and interests of elderly peoplePramod, D [47]
Privacy settingsAssisted/UnassistedWhether to provide privacy assistance settings to older usersLiu Z, Wang X [34]
Table 2. Questionnaire selection set example.
Table 2. Questionnaire selection set example.
AttributeOption A Option B
Information acquisitionEasyDifficult
Information understandingEasyDifficult
Privacy protection policyObscureClear
Privacy protection technologyInvalidValid
Privacy settingAssistedUnassisted
Your choice isSustainability 17 01416 i001Sustainability 17 01416 i001
Table 3. Sample descriptive statistics.
Table 3. Sample descriptive statistics.
AttributeVariable AttributeNumberProportion
GenderMale4042.55%
Female5457.44%
Age50–55 years old3132.97%
56–60 years old1414.89%
61–65 years old2526.59%
66–70 years old1010.63%
Age 71 and older1414.89%
Career before retirementCivil servants and enterprises and institutions1718.08%
Enterprise2324.46%
Military 44.25%
Self-employed2526.59%
Farmer1111.70%
Others1414.89%
Average monthly earningsCNY 2000 and below99.57%
CNY 2001–4000 3132.97%
CNY 4001–60002627.65%
CNY 6001–80001515.95%
CNY 8000 and above1313.82%
Permanent residenceCities and towns7276.59%
Countryside2223.40%
Table 4. Mixed logit model parameter estimation results (scenario without aging modification).
Table 4. Mixed logit model parameter estimation results (scenario without aging modification).
AttributeCoefficientSEZ-Score
Information acquisition1.756 ***0.2307.62
Information understanding0.698 *0.3781.84
Privacy protection policy0.796 ***0.2313.44
Privacy protection technology0.110 *0.3170.35
Privacy setting−0.1660.320−0.52
N1488
AIC1581.430
BIC1661.169
Log likelihood−775.71514
LR Chi2 (6)78.72
Prob > Chi20.0000
Note: * and *** indicate that the estimated results are statistically significant at 10% and 1%, respectively.
Table 5. Mixed logit model parameter estimation results (adaptation to aging scenario).
Table 5. Mixed logit model parameter estimation results (adaptation to aging scenario).
CoefficientSEZ-Score
Information acquisition0.940 ***0.236−3.98
Information understanding1.779 ***0.2407.40
Privacy protection policy1.819 ***0.2178.37
Privacy protection technology0.284 ***0.2201.29
Privacy setting0.7260.2183.33
N1488
AIC1476.786
BIC1561.669
Log likelihood−722.3932
LR Chi2 (6)129.61
Prob > Chi20.0000
Note: *** indicate that the estimated results are statistically significant at 1%, respectively.
Table 6. Research result.
Table 6. Research result.
Assumed Serial NumberHypothesesHypotheses Result
Hypothesis 1Elderly tourists prefer e-commerce tourism platforms that provide easy access to information.Confirmed
Hypothesis 2Elderly tourists prefer easy-to-understand e-commerce tourism platforms.Confirmed
Hypothesis 3Elderly tourists prefer tourism e-commerce platforms with clearer privacy policies.Confirmed
Hypothesis 4Elderly tourists prefer tourism e-commerce platforms with effective privacy protection technologies.Confirmed
Hypothesis 5Elderly tourists prefer tourism e-commerce platforms with auxiliary privacy setting functions.Unconfirmed
Table 7. Analysis results of interaction terms (scenario without aging modification).
Table 7. Analysis results of interaction terms (scenario without aging modification).
Interaction TermCoefficientSEZ-Score
Gender
Gender_IA−0.830 ***0.309−2.69
Gender_IU0.3380.2731.24
Gender_PP0.1450.2720.53
Gender_PT0.4800.3281.46
Gender_PS−0.3330.329−1.01
Age
Age_IA0.405 ***0.1063.82
Age_IU0.176 *0.0951.85
Age_PP0.0320.0950.34
Age_PT0.189 *0.1131.66
Age_PS0.1610.1091.47
Education
Education_IA−0.1190.176−0.68
Education_IU0.1920.1571.22
Education_PP−0.1530.157−0.98
Education_PT−0.0460.191−0.24
Education_PS0.0790.1880.42
Career
Career_IA0.2570.1032.51
Career_IU0.0200.0910.22
Career_PP0.0150.0910.16
Career_PT0.2170.1101.97
Career_PS0.2550.1072.38
Average monthly earnings
Average monthly earnings_IA0.1930.1601.21
Average monthly earnings_IU−0.0800.143−0.56
Average monthly earnings_PP0.1830.1431.28
Average monthly earnings_PT0.1460.1730.85
Average monthly earnings_PS0.0400.1690.24
N1488
AIC1423.337
BIC1502.108
Log likelihood−696.66869
LR Chi2 (25)66.13
Prob > Chi20.0000
Note: * and *** indicate that the estimated results are statistically significant at 10% and 1%, respectively.
Table 8. Analysis results of interaction terms (adaptation to aging scenario).
Table 8. Analysis results of interaction terms (adaptation to aging scenario).
CoefficientSEZ-Score
Gender
Gender_IA−0.2000.287−0.70
Gender_IU0.1210.2610.46
Gender_PP−0.1010.260−0.39
Gender_PT0.0600.3210.19
Gender_PS0.1140.3120.36
Age
Age_IA0.273 ***0.100−2.73
Age_IU0.0170.0920.19
Age_PP0.0900.0910.99
Age_PT−0.1010.111−0.91
Age_PS0.0400.1080.37
Education
Education_IA0.1050.1760.59
Education_IU−0.1930.161−1.20
Education_PP0.1230.1600.77
Education_PT−0.1450.197−0.74
Education_PS−0.0060.191−0.03
Career
Career_IA0.0410.0950.43
Career_IU0.0250.0870.29
Career_PP−0.1910.086−2.22
Career_PT−0.0650.107−0.61
Career_PS−0.0750.105−0.72
Average monthly earnings
Average monthly earnings_IA−0.253 *0.153−1.66
Average monthly earnings_IU0.0380.1390.27
Average monthly earnings_PP−0.296 **0.139−2.14
Average monthly earnings_PT−0.0920.171−0.54
Average monthly earnings_PS−0.084 *0.168−0.50
N1488
AIC1536.019
BIC1747.794
Log likelihood−728.00945
LR Chi2 (25)35.78
Prob > Chi20.0451
Note: *, ** and *** indicate that the estimated results are statistically significant at 10%, 5% and 1%, respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, L.; Qiu, M. How Are Travel E-Commerce Platforms Becoming Sustainable? A Discrete Choice Experiment Based on the Technology Acceptance Preferences of Elderly Tourists. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041416

AMA Style

Xia L, Qiu M. How Are Travel E-Commerce Platforms Becoming Sustainable? A Discrete Choice Experiment Based on the Technology Acceptance Preferences of Elderly Tourists. Sustainability. 2025; 17(4):1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Liwen, and Mengyuan Qiu. 2025. "How Are Travel E-Commerce Platforms Becoming Sustainable? A Discrete Choice Experiment Based on the Technology Acceptance Preferences of Elderly Tourists" Sustainability 17, no. 4: 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041416

APA Style

Xia, L., & Qiu, M. (2025). How Are Travel E-Commerce Platforms Becoming Sustainable? A Discrete Choice Experiment Based on the Technology Acceptance Preferences of Elderly Tourists. Sustainability, 17(4), 1416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop