1. Introduction
Bioelectricity is electricity generated by burning biomass, which comes from organic matter of plant or animal origin. The importance of bioelectricity stands out because it meets the targets set by Brazil in its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) at COP21. Its use has low carbon emissions and can even be considered carbon neutral when associated with sustainable practices, making it a strategic option in the domestic energy supply, in pursuit of energy security, and in reducing CO
2 levels in the atmosphere, based on the circular economy. The green economy seeks to improve human well-being and social equality by mitigating environmental risks and ecological scarcity. In order to be more efficient and meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), nations must combine strategies for low-carbon economies using circular mechanisms, in both scale and scope, considering the comparative and competitive advantages they possess [
1,
2,
3].
In Brazil, the sugar-energy sector (sugar-alcohol industry) has sugarcane (
Saccharum officinarum) as its main raw material, which stands out for its ability to produce clean energy (heat, ethanol, and electricity) on a large scale and serves as an alternative to addressing the problems arising from climate change. This segment has undergone and is undergoing transformations and rearrangements because it is deeply intertwined with political–legal, economic, technological, social, and environmental aspects. In the sugar-energy sector, the diversification of the product portfolio generally also stems from the generation of effective risk mitigation strategies, particularly in the decarbonization of the transport sector, given the need to replace fossil fuels [
4,
5].
In the last decade, the determinants of investment decisions in the sector have been the attractiveness of sugarcane ethanol and the bioelectricity generated from sugarcane bagasse. Currently, only 15% of its potential is utilized. However, if the biomass present in sugarcane plantations were fully utilized, bioelectricity would have the technical potential to reach 151,000 GWh, which would supply more than 30% of energy consumption in the National Integrated System (NIS). Encouraged by the RenovaBio Program and a favorable business environment, bioelectricity for the grid has the potential to expand by more than 55% by 2030 [
6]. In 2023, bioelectricity production from sugarcane reached 21,000 GWh, representing 75% of all biomass-based electricity generation in the country [
4,
6,
7].
Regions with the potential to offer bioelectricity stimulate development centers, which are either a driving economic unit or a group of multiple such units. Regional economics seeks to understand the relationship between economic activities in a given geographical region. However, it does not incorporate sufficient theoretical frameworks to adequately explain spatial phenomena. Focusing on the analysis of spatial patterns and distributions of phenomena and variables, considering the geographical location of the data, spatial economics aims to understand how geography affects economic processes, exploring the relationship between space and the behavior of the variables studied. Within spatial economics, exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA) is an approach that integrates spatial and geographical statistical techniques to identify trends, patterns, and spatial associations in economic activity. This method considers data holistically, examining their joint behavior and exploring the relationship between installed power and geographical, socioeconomic, and environmental variables [
8,
9].
For Perry [
10], the existence of industrial clusters strengthens the universal policy that ensures sustained growth for any locality or region. Many managers, in both the public and private sectors, see the statistical validation of clusters as an opportunity to combine local competitive advantages with other policy intervention tools in order to promote regional development. Thus, ESDA can be a starting point for identifying regions prone to greater development in biomass energy generation.
ESDA also takes into account individual interactions and their impact on collective behavior and established patterns, revealing the mutual influence between regions and their surroundings, as well as the influence of other variables on the process. This analysis helps to identify clusters, outliers, and spatial dispersion patterns in the data [
11,
12,
13].
Similar to other spatial analysis metrics, ESDA faces some limitations. Its spatial analysis depends on data being geocoded or mapped to a specific spatial location, which, in some cases, makes it difficult to conduct bivariate analyses at various territorial levels. Some approaches allow geographic boundaries to be defined by the data (for example, the Scan statistics cluster analysis), but these fail to significantly identify neighborhood effects, which are the result of comparative advantages and technological spillover. Thus, evaluating the sugar-energy biomass bioelectricity generation sector using ESDA is significant, since other studies may address different issues, but in similar geographical locations, making comparative discussions feasible.
In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of spatial analysis in economic modeling. Notable studies include Cabral et al. [
12], who forecasted electricity consumption in Brazil; Coelho Junior et al. [
14], who assessed the spatial distribution of firewood production in the Brazilian northeast; Dunn et al. [
15], who analyzed power outage data and identified spatial and temporal heterogeneity in power grid reliability; Zhang [
16], who showed the spatial characteristics of low-carbon energy in China; Santos Junior et al. [
3], who analyzed the distribution and spatio-temporal dependence of the supply of forest bioelectricity in Brazil; and Szaruga et al. [
17], who verified the spatial autocorrelation of power grid instability in the context of electricity production from renewable energy sources in Polish regions.
To understand the spatial interactions in a sugar-energy bioelectricity generation sector, and to identify areas with a high concentration of supply, this study presents a methodology for analyzing the distribution and spatial dependence of bioelectricity, using Brazil as a base scenario. Although this study focuses on Brazil, the methodological approach can be adapted and replicated in different international contexts, allowing the analysis of spatial patterns in various regions of the world.
The results should explain the evolution of sugarcane biomass as an energy vector in Brazil, while also describing the structure and regional distribution of this form of generation. Given that the development of clusters subsidizes policy professionals in rationalizing local intervention, it can contribute to the creation of regions with significant industrial and economic power in this type of renewable energy. On a local scale, the results will support public policy development and decision-making, facilitating the formulation and implementation of strategies for the energy security of Brazil’s electricity matrix, and advancing the decarbonization of the economy.
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 4 shows the evolution of the number of sugarcane power plants installed in Brazil from 2004 to 2024. In the initial year of the analysis, the total installed capacity was 4.11 GW, distributed across 189 power plants. The southeast stood out with the highest number of plants, accounting for 121 units and 3.04 GW (74.11% of the national total power). The northeast was also noteworthy, with its economy centered on sugar and alcohol production for many decades. The region had 31 power plants generating 0.44 GW.
In 2014, significant progress was observed, particularly in the midwest and southeast regions. Nationwide, the total installed capacity reached 11.29 GW, corresponding to an average annual growth of 10.63%, with a total of 377 thermal power plants. The midwest experienced a 12.54% increase per annum (p.a.) in the number of thermal plants, reaching 62 units, and a 20.81% increase p.a. in installed capacity, totaling 2.81 GW. The southeast expanded its capacity to 7.05 GW, with an 8.74% annual growth rate, across 232 plants.
In 2024, the power granted nationally was 13.55 GW (+1.84% p.a.), distributed across 442 power plants. Over the past 20 years, Brazil’s sugarcane power generation has tripled in capacity, while the number of plants has doubled. This growth over the last two decades not only demonstrates the expansion of investments and the evolution of decarbonization policies, but also reflects improvements in the efficiency and technology within the segment. In 2024, the southeast remained the region with the highest power granted, with 8.61 GW across 274 plants. This was followed by the midwest, with 3.24 GW and 75 thermal plants, and the northeast, which had 57 thermal plants, with installed capacity of 0.99 GW.
Figure 5 presents the I
Moran_global and local bivariate index for the supply of sugar-energy bioelectricity and total consumption across Brazilian states. The global index of 0.107 represents a low positive association, suggesting that power plants are not clustered based on electricity demand. Only the states of São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul deviated from the national pattern. The state of São Paulo, in particular, had a supply of 6.62 GW of sugarcane-based power (48.76% of the national scenario) and a consumption of 11.78 TWh (26.58%).
In addition to the association with total consumption, the states of São Paulo, Mato Grosso do Sul, and Minas Gerais demonstrated an association from the perspective of electricity consumption in the industrial sector, reinforcing the existence of a strong localization pattern for sugar-energy biomass supply in this region. All identified patterns showed statistical significance (
Figure 5c). Rio de Janeiro was significant at the lowest level of the test, considering its proximity to the state of São Paulo, which has the largest supply and consumption in the country.
In Brazil, energy supply is spatially distributed and associated with factors of natural availability. As a result, sugar-energy bioelectricity exhibits a spatial association with areas that have comparative advantages in sugarcane production, which is why the grouping in this region was noted.
In addition to the bivariate analysis,
Figure 6 shows the autocorrelation of sugar-energy bioelectricity supply, based on the I
Moran_global and local index, for the intermediate regions of Brazil. At the intermediate level, it was possible to observe a high supply cluster in the center-west and southeast regions, with 8.39 GW installed. The high supply cluster accounted for 61.92% of Brazil’s total supply. The global I
Moran demonstrated a positive correlation between the intermediate regions, with a value of 0.543, reflecting a moderate to strong positive spatial autocorrelation.
Only 12 intermediate regions were part of this cluster. In the state of São Paulo, these included Ribeirão Preto (1723.17 MW), São José do Rio Preto (1052.11 MW), Uberaba (921.23 MW), Bauru (822.63 MW), Araçatuba (593.25 MW), Presidente Prudente (560.83 MW), Campinas (482.84 MW), Marília (437.55 MW), and Araraquara (365.48 MW). For the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, these included the regions of Rio Verde (856.43 MW), Campo Grande (373.17 MW), and Itumbiara (202.24 MW). Climatic suitability is one of the main factors driving regional productivity, with rainfall concentrated in the summer and droughts in the winter [
22]. The most statistically significant observations were located within the High-High cluster.
Coelho Junior et al. [
23], using the Scan statistics methodology, highlighted the existence of clusters in this region of the country. Cluster formation is associated with the proximity of raw materials and skilled labor, which is common in this region of northwestern São Paulo. The proximity of resources and technical expertise significantly reduces transportation and logistics costs, while also supporting a reliable supply chain [
24,
25].
For the Low-Low pattern, the identified regions were Lábrea (AM), Patos (PB), Governador Valadares (MG), Juiz de Fora (MG), Lages (SC), Chapecó (SC), Santa Maria (RS), Passo Fundo (RS), and Caxias do Sul (RS). This pattern indicates that these regions are located in areas where neighboring regions have little to no production. None of the Low-Low intermediate regions had production of sugar-energy bioelectricity. In the intermediate regions related to the south, the biomass energy generation profile differs, which justifies the pattern observed in our analysis.
Brazil has numerous resources for generating electricity, and in addition to sugarcane production, other areas concentrate their bioenergy generation on renewable wood resources. Coelho Junior and Santos Júnior [
26] identified the existence of conglomerates in the forest bioelectricity sector in the center-south region of Brazil, where the main inputs are black liquor and forest residues, located in the states of Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul. Some areas stand out for their development in this sector, such as the mesoregions of Imperatriz (MA), Sinop (MT), Campo Grande (MS), and Lages (SC). This pattern suggests that regions within these clusters hold advantages over others.
In addition to the bivariate observation,
Figure 5 shows the autocorrelation of the supply of sugar-energy bioelectricity, based on the I
Moran_global and local index, for the intermediate regions of Brazil. At the intermediate level, it was possible to observe a high-supply cluster in the center-west and southeast regions, with 8.39 GW installed. The high-supply cluster accounted for 61.92% of Brazil’s total supply. The global I
Moran demonstrates a positive correlation between the intermediate regions, with a value of 0.543; this scenario reflects a medium to strong positive spatial autocorrelation.
Although it has a supply of 38.09 MW, the region is surrounded by intermediate regions with high installed potential, such as Campinas, Ribeirão Preto, and Uberaba, but it also neighbors Juiz de Fora, which has zero sugar-energy power. For the intermediate regions, no observations were found in the High-Low pattern.
To increase the accuracy of the analysis, a spatial evaluation was also conducted for the immediate regions, for which the Global and Local I
Moran indices were presented (
Figure 7). Similar to the intermediate and state levels, high-level clustering was observed in the regions belonging to the states of São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul, reinforcing their roles as the main hubs for national generation. As with the intermediate level, it was possible to observe a positive autocorrelation for the Brazilian scenario. From I_
MoranGlobal, the regions are spatially associated; however, a few neighbors escape the general distribution pattern.
For the High-High cluster, 39 immediate areas were involved. The total power found in this cluster was 7.33 GW granted. The decrease in value when compared to the intermediate level is due to the grouping together of regions with a smaller share of the national supply alongside others of greater prominence, due to the regional classification. In any case, 54.1% of the national total is concentrated in these regions. It should be noted that Brazil has 510 immediate units, and that only 39 units (7.64% of Brazil’s immediate units) concentrate more than half of the potential granted in 2024.
Some of the main sites are Ribeirão Preto (857.90 MW), Nova Andradina (542.68 MW), Uberaba (504.41 MW), Barretos (449.91 MW), Presidente Prudente (390.01 MW), Catanduva (353.54 MW), São José do Rio Preto (346.66 MW), Bauru (334.84 MW), and São Joaquim da Barra/Orlândia (267.40 MW).
In addition to the High-High pattern observations, another pattern that was more prominent at this level of detail was the Low-High regions, highlighting locations with not-so-high potential that were grouped together at the intermediate level. There were 20 immediate areas for this self-correlation pattern in total. Only Iporá (GO), Birigui—-Penápolis (SP), Ponta Porã (MS), Naviraí-Mundo Novo (MS), Botucatu (SP), and Araxá (MG) had power granted from sugarcane biomass, but in significantly lower quantities than their neighbors. The other 14 immediate areas had no potential from this resource.
In the midwest, the Ceres-Rialma-Goianésia region stood out in an isolated way, with 200.3 MW granted, but with no direct proximity to other regions with similar potential. Unlike the intermediate level, some of the immediate regions in the north-northeast stood out for their High-Low pattern, indicating themselves to be outliers within these regions. The northeast region of Brazil has a high dependence on biomass energy, mainly sugarcane ethanol, produced in the coastal area from Rio Grande do Norte to the state of Alagoas, but the installed potential is small compared to the expansion of the sector in the midwest and southeast [
27]. An independent assessment of this region could generate some clusters, making it pertinent for more specific and regionalized studies. In addition, this region is currently showing a strong increase in specialization in solar photovoltaic and wind power generating units, which means that investments in sugar-energy biomass are lower than at other times [
28].
Santos Júnior et al. [
27] estimated that it is still possible to obtain up to 6.33 million toe in the northeast region from sugar cane. Of this amount, sugarcane bagasse would be the main vector, accounting for 51.96% of the energy offered. Among the states, Alagoas would be the primary highlight with 1.87 million toe, followed by the state of Pernambuco.
The main immediate region outside the Mato Grosso do Sul-São Paulo axis was Santa Maria da Vitória, in Bahia, with 125 MW granted from sugarcane. The regions of Picos (PI), with 85 MW; Aracaju (SE), with 42.50 MW; São Luís (MA), with 41.1 MW; and Alagoinhas (BA), with 38.10 MW also stood out. All the observations in the interior of the northeast were statistically significant, at a p-value < 0.01.
The national supply structure for sugar-energy bioelectricity in Brazil has been shown to depend on locational and regional factors, with regions having higher supply densities gaining advantages associated with spatial groupings.
According to Wang et al. [
29], spatial differences and disparities complicate the management and formulation of public policies aimed at regional energy development, requiring spatial techniques to identify areas with similar characteristics. Some international results highlight the need to understand spatial dynamics in order to manage private investments and regional public policies. For instance, Xu et al. [
30] analyzed spatial patterns of agglomeration for renewable energy sources in China. The authors showed that both environmental regulation and renewable generation exhibited positive spatial autocorrelation. This effect illustrates how the implementation of appropriate policies in the Brazilian territory, particularly in cluster regions, can intensify the increase in clean generation, favoring sustainable energy development.
Liu et al. [
31] also observed that regions with high innovation in renewable energy technologies tend to be close to regions with high degrees of green industrial transformation and modernization, which helps boost regional development. The authors also suggest that agglomeration can generate a “siphon effect,” attracting capital, technology, and talent from neighboring areas, and that local policies are necessary to prevent harm to less developed areas.
As for private investment, Li et al. [
32] pointed out that the level of economic development and demand for electricity in the regions surrounding conglomerates should be considered. In regions with high demand and low development, investments in renewable energy can have a more significant impact on sustainable, regional development.
In Brazil, the main challenges for investments in bioelectricity involve site selection, licensing, and grid connection [
3]. Many bioelectricity production plants are located far from pumping substations that are capable of delivering the electricity produced. As a result, access to the grid becomes a barrier to the incorporation of new bioelectricity generation projects [
33]. Therefore, analyzing the spatial distribution of supply can be useful for energy planning. This analysis would help optimize the construction of new projects by highlighting areas with greater regional and technological development, thus reducing investment risks [
34,
35].
In Brazil’s short-term plan, the Ten-Year Energy Expansion Plan 2030, an 18.52% increase in the supply of energy from sugar-energy biomass is expected. The results presented in this study are directly linked to the sector’s progress, demonstrating areas of great opportunity for implementation, as well as other areas with potential for expansion.
Regional studies show investors and public authorities how the dynamics of the sector work and highlight opportunities for new investments. These new investments are part of Brazil’s national energy transition goals, which are aligned with SDG 7, and aim to keep the share of renewable energy in the national energy matrix high, and to expand infrastructure and improve technology for the provision of modern and sustainable energy services for all [
34].
Thus, the results presented in this essay, along with international experiences, provide valuable insights for the private investment sector in the area of sugarcane bagasse bioenergy, while also assisting public policymakers. A practical example could be the creation of incentive policies to promote the implementation of sugar-energy power plants in regions neighboring those with High-Low patterns, which could generate future High-High clusters through the competitive advantages that may exist in that region. Therefore, the spatial differentiation of energy policy must be thoroughly considered.