Next Article in Journal
A Conceptual Sustainability Assessment Framework for Urban Micromobility Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Low-Carbon Policy and Earnings Management: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Microplastics and Health: A Review on Environmental Exposure, Toxicokinetics and Biological Effects

by
Vishavjeet Rathee
1,
Yogesh K. Ahlawat
2,3,
Ritu Singh
4,
Jitender Kumar Bhardwaj
5,
Ajaybeer Kaur
6,
Suresh Kumar
7,
Priya Sharma
8,
Rita Choudhary
9,*,
Nidhi Didwania
9,
Dharmendra Kumar
10 and
Shivankar Agarwal
11,*
1
Department of Life Sciences, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 203201, India
2
Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, SGT University, Gurugram 122505, India
3
Allied Health Sciences, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha 442001, India
4
Department of Biotechnology, CRM Jat College, Hisar 125001, India
5
Department of Zoology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra 136118, India
6
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, CGC Landran, Mohali 140307, India
7
Department of Zoology, CRM Jat College, Hisar 125001, India
8
School of Pharmacy and Emerging Sciences, Baddi University of Emerging Sciences and Technology, Baddi 173205, India
9
Manav Rachna Centre for Medicinal Plant Pathology, Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering and Technology, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad 121004, India
10
Department of Botany, Miranda House, University of Delhi, Delhi 110001, India
11
APC Microbiome Ireland, School of Microbiology, University College Cork, T12YT20 Cork, Ireland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(7), 3527; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073527
Submission received: 27 January 2026 / Revised: 23 February 2026 / Accepted: 19 March 2026 / Published: 3 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Soil Conservation and Sustainability)

Abstract

Microplastics (MPs) are synthetic polymer particles that are generally less than 5 mm in size and have attracted heightened scrutiny due to their pervasive presence in the environment, along with their toxicological significance. Several research investigations documented its presence in humans as a profound finding in biological tissues and fluids crossing barriers, leading to oxidative and inflammatory pathways alterations associated with blood, placenta, cardiovascular, pulmonary, nephrotic, other systems, and their disorders. Given the ubiquitous utilization of microplastics across diverse sectors, it is imperative to systematically investigate and elucidate their potential toxicological effects on biological systems through rigorous and mechanistically informed research. This review will also provide the synthesis of recent mechanistic data on the toxicity that can be caused by MPs and will determine key gaps that impede efficient human health risk evaluation. A structured literature search was conducted via PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, mostly from the studies published between 2010 and 2026. The studies of exposure characteristics and biological effects were analyzed in vitro, in vivo, and in human biomonitoring, and the primary focus of the interventions includes oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, hepatotoxicity, and metabolic malfunction. MPs possess various physicochemical properties, such as a low particle size, various shapes, surface area, polymer composition, and the presence of sorbed or intrinsic additives. When MPs are taken up by cells, they can induce oxidative stress via increasing ROS, eventually leading to high lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial malfunction, DNA fragmentation, and eventually cell death. MPs also cause pro-inflammatory cytokine responses, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, altering the immune system and cell profile, leading to systemic inflammation. In aquatic and terrestrial organisms, these microplastics have a harmful impact on growth, reproduction, and behavior in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Under conditions of controlled exposure, the organ-specific toxicities that have been reported include hepatic, renal, neurological, reproductive, and cardiovascular systems. Although the fields of mechanistic knowledge are growing, there is still a substantial amount of uncertainty; there is a lack of characterization of the long-term effects of low-dose chronic exposure, the kinetics of bioaccumulation, biodegradation potential, and transgenerational effects. In addition, there are no standardized procedures for the characterization of MPs, nor the reporting of the distribution of size or exposure measurements, which limits the comparability of cross-studies and makes it difficult to assess risks quantitatively. The dynamics of interactions of MPs between co-adsorbed contaminants like heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals are also yet to be explored. Although all evidence available to date does indicate biologically plausible mechanisms of MP-induced toxicity, integrated research employing standardized analytical protocols, an environmentally relevant exposure model, and human epidemiological data is required to ensure that laboratory results are translated into evidence-based public health and regulatory actions. This review offers an in-depth analysis of the existing molecular understanding of MP-induced toxicity, demonstrates organism-level impacts throughout species, and establishes vital fields for future studies. In order to develop competent guidelines to minimize MP exposure and its adverse health effects, it is crucial to cover these gaps via research that incorporates toxicology and environmental science.

1. Introduction

Global plastic production has increased exponentially from about 1.5 million tons in the 1950s to over 400 million tons a year in recent years, leading to unprecedented environmental issues, particularly in relation to the persistence and fragmentation of plastics into micro- and nanoscale particles [1,2]. Due to their ubiquitous presence and poorly known effects on biological systems, microplastic (MP) particles (less than 5 mm) emerge as environmental pollutants and can be classified as primary or secondary. Primary MPs are produced for specific applications, such as industrial abrasives, drug delivery systems, and exfoliants, while secondary macroparticles are produced when large plastic debris is broken down into small pieces via different activities such as microbiological, photolysis, mechanical abrasion, and thermo-oxidative weathering [3,4]. Microplastics often travel, to a large extent, due to their small size, hydrophobic nature, and physicochemical stability, accumulating in a range of environmental compartments such as far-off mountain snow caps to deep-sea sediments [5]. Microplastics are often studied to discover the impact they have on humans, as their presence has been found in human edible plants, dairy products, potable water, and fish, and poses exposure and toxicological threats to biological organs such as the liver, lungs, blood, placenta, and gastrointestinal tract. Humans are exposed to MPs mostly by food and inhalation, while skin contact may be important in work-related situations [6,7,8]. Ingestion results from consuming tainted food and drink, such as processed foods, shellfish, fruits, vegetables, table salt, and drinking water. Airborne macroparticles, particularly from synthetic fibers in the textile industry, pose a serious threat as their inhalation results in the internalization of these macroparticles via passing through epithelial barriers into the bloodstream, thus passing to distant organs [9].
Microplastics also induce oxidative stress, immunological dysregulation, endocrine disruption, reproductive toxicity, neurotoxicity, and even transgenerational epigenetic changes, according to an expanding corpus of in vitro and in vivo research [10,11,12,13,14]. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), either directly as a result of transition metals or indirectly through mitochondrial malfunction or inflammatory cell activation, is a crucial initial event. The resulting oxidative stress can cause apoptosis or necrosis, thus damaging the lipids and nucleic acids, and causing changes in cellular redox equilibrium. Along with oxidative stress, several pro-inflammatory reactions activate various transcription factors like NF-κB and AP-1, and upregulate cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Inflammasome activation, epithelial barrier failure, and macrophage polarization are important characteristics of MP-induced immunotoxicity [15]. Prolonged MP exposure has also been linked to immunological fatigue, T-cell activation, and decreased antigen presentation according to specific studies [16]. Furthermore, MPs could impact endocrine homeostasis by leaking plasticizers and monomers that contain substances with estrogenic, anti-androgenic, and thyroid-disrupting characteristics, including phthalates, bisphenol A (BPA), and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) [17]. For both aquatic and mammalian models, these chemicals have been shown to interrupt the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, interact with the receptors for nuclear hormones (including ER, AR, and TR), and affect steroid production, reproductive development, and libido [18]. Following exposure to these macroparticles, zebrafish, rats, and neuronal cell cultures have demonstrated behavioral abnormalities, altered locomotion, neurotransmitter dysregulation, microglial activation, and neuroinflammation, raising concerns about the neurotoxic effects of microplastics [19]. These effects are thought to result from both indirect inflammatory cascades and direct neuronal uptake. Oxidative damage to the dopaminergic and cholinergic systems, along with epigenetic alterations in brain tissues, has also been reported. Experimental studies indicate that microplastics can trigger molecular and cellular responses, influencing multiple biological pathways and modulating inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways. These changes may result in maternal–fetal transfer of microplastics, posing potential risk to developing embryos, postpartum vascularization, and neonatal immunity [20,21]. Toxic effects are not limited to laboratory settings; ecotoxicological investigations across diverse taxa—ranging from phytoplankton and crustaceans to earthworms, amphibians, birds, and mammals—have confirmed that microplastics can activate biological pathways associated with developmental delays, growth inhibition, reproductive suppression, altered feeding behavior, and histopathological damage [22].
Microplastics (MPs) are consumed by filter-feeding and deposit-feeding species, often leading to stomach obstruction, energy loss, and reduced food absorption. At higher trophic levels, MPs have been shown to accumulate in organs such as the kidneys, muscles, and brain, demonstrating their ability to bioaccumulate across the food chain [23]. Ingestion of these particles can also result in gut blockage, reduced energy levels, and impaired nutrient assimilation [24]. At advanced trophic levels, microplastics can translocate and accumulate in the liver, muscles, and brain tissues, ultimately contributing to bioaccumulation throughout the food web [25]. In addition, microplastics can interact synergistically with other environmental factors. They readily absorb heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and mercury, as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pharmaceuticals, and microbial communities (biofilms) [26]. Several studies have demonstrated that it causes hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity in rodents, along with genotoxic effects in aquatic organisms [27].
Despite numerous studies and reviews examining and reviews the environmental distribution, ecological effects, and overall toxicological impacts of microplastics (MPs), there remains a critical need to better understand the microplastics-induced toxicity. Current investigations are limited by inadequate exposure models, poor comparability of biological endpoints, and inconsistent particle characterization. Relatively few studies have incorporated mechanistic evidence linking environmental exposure to MPs with inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptotic pathways, and metabolic disruptions within a unified ecological framework. Moreover, little focus has been given to dose–response relationships, the relevance of exposure to human health, and the potential role of MPs in metabolic disorders such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [28,29]. In addition, the long-term consequences of chronic, low-dose exposure, especially among vulnerable populations such as infants, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals, remain poorly understood. Similarly, there is a lack of detailed information on the pharmacokinetics, biotransformation processes, and clearance of MPs following internalization, which hinders comprehensive risk assessment. This article compiles current knowledge on the potential hazards of microplastics by describing their primary routes of entry into the body, elucidating mechanisms underlying oxidative stress, inflammation, endocrine disruption, and neurotoxicity, and examining their impacts across different taxonomic groups of microorganisms. It also discusses the role of MPs as chemical vectors, analytical tools used to assess toxicity, and emerging approaches such as omics-based analyses and advanced imaging techniques. The primary objective of this review is to synthesize existing experimental and biomonitoring data to better understand the molecular pathways of MP-induced toxicity and evaluate cell-level effects across aquatic, terrestrial, and mammalian systems. This review provides a more comprehensive and translational perspective compared to previous studies by integrating mechanistic insights with realistic exposure scenarios. Furthermore, it highlights significant knowledge gaps and identifies priority areas for future research, aiming to support the development of evidence-based strategies for reducing plastic exposure and safeguarding human health. It also outlines underexplored research areas to guide future investigations, risk assessment, and policy formulation.

2. Routes of Exposure and Toxicokinetics

Microplastics (MPs) have permeated virtually every environmental compartment—air, water, soil, and biota resulting in multiple potential exposure pathways for humans and animals [30]. The primary routes through which MPs enter biological systems include ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption, with ingestion and inhalation being the most dominant and concerning due to their potential for systemic distribution and organ-level bioaccumulation [31]. Advances in analytical methods have enabled the detection of microplastics in human biological samples, providing direct evidence of systemic exposure. Raman micro spectroscopy, as used by Ragusa et al., identified pigmented polypropylene fragments in human placental tissue, indicating the maternal–fetal interface [32]. Similarly, Leslie et al. reported the presence of polymer particles, such as polyethylene terephthalate and polystyrene, in human blood samples, suggesting systemic circulation [33]. More recently, Jenner et al. found microplastic fibers and fragments in human lung tissue obtained from surgical resections, confirming inhalation as a probable exposure route [34]. Although these studies demonstrate the presence of MPs in human tissues, they do not establish causality with clinical disease outcomes and analytical sensitivity.
A comprehensive assessment of absorption, distribution, metabolism (biotransformation) and excretion (ADME) is essential, as the toxicokinetics of microplastics and nanoplastics are governed by particle size, surface chemistry, polymer composition, aggregation state, and interactions with biological matrices. Therefore, particle-specific characteristics and biological transport pathways must be integrated into a mechanistic toxicokinetic framework.

2.1. Ingestion

Ingestion is one of the well-documented routes of microplastic exposure in humans. Numerous dietary sources, including seafood, honey, salt, fruits and vegetables, have been reported to contain MPs. Filter-feeding organisms such as mussels, oysters, and crustaceans can accumulate microplastics, acting as both bioindicators and vectors for trophic transfer to humans and higher trophic levels. Several studies have also reported the presence of MPs in commonly consumed crops such as lettuce, carrots, and tomatoes, attributed to agricultural practices such as plastic mulching, biosolid application, and wastewater irrigation [35,36]. In addition, processed foods and drinking water (both tap and bottled) have been identified as significant sources of exposure. A recent meta-analysis estimated that humans may invest approximately 39,000 and 52,000 MPs annually through food and beverages alone [37]. The detection of MPs in human feces further confirms gastrointestinal exposure.
Ingested microplastics may alter gut microbiota, induce local inflammatory responses, and interact with gastrointestinal epithelial cells. Through mechanisms such as endocytosis, paracellular transport, or M-cell-mediated translocation in Peyer’s patches, particles, particularly nanoscale plastics, can cross intestinal barriers following internalization [38]. Smaller microplastics (<10 µm) and nano plastics exhibit higher translocation potential due to their size and increased surface area to volume ratio, which enhances absorption efficiency. Experimental studies suggest that systemic uptake of microplastics is approximately 1% of the administered dose, whereas nanoplastics show translocation rates ranging from 0.2% to 5% in rodent models. These rates are influenced by factors such as surface charge, inflammatory status, paracellular permeability, and other physiological and pathological conditions [39,40]. Once internalized, these particles may enter systemic circulation and accumulate in organs such as the liver, spleen, kidneys, and brain [27].

2.2. Inhalation

Inhalation of airborne microplastics (MPs) has emerged as a well-recognized and increasingly significant exposure route, particularly in indoor and urban environments. Microplastics (MPs) can enter the human body through multiple exposure pathways, including ingestion, inhalation, dermal contact, and vertical transfer, as illustrated in Figure 1. The primary sources of inhalable MPs are synthetic materials found in textiles, home furnishings, rugs, and suspended household dust [41,42]. Compared to outdoor environments, indoor air often contains significantly higher concentrations of microplastic fragments, with exposure risk being greatest in confined and poorly ventilated spaces [43]. Airborne MPs vary in size, ranging from visible fibers to ultrafine particles capable of deeply penetrating the pulmonary alveoli. Epidemiological studies indicate that workers in industries such as waste recycling, thermoplastic manufacturing, and textiles are particularly susceptible due to prolonged exposure to polymer dust [44]. Occupational exposure has been associated with bronchitis, respiratory symptoms, and interstitial lung disease, commonly referred to as “flock worker’s lung” [45]. Based on their aerodynamic dimensions, MPs can deposit throughout the respiratory tract particles smaller than 2.5 µm (PM 2.5), can evade mucociliary clearance, and reach alveolar spaces [46,47]. Particles larger than 10 µ tend to deposit in bronchiolar regions through sedimentation mechanisms with increasing deposition efficiency and enhanced diffusivity. Furthermore, they may induce oxidative stress, localized inflammation, and potential translocation into the bloodstream via alveolar capillaries [48]. Recent studies have demonstrated systemic migration through the respiratory pathway by detecting small plastic fragments in human lung tissue obtained from biopsy and postmortem analyses [49]. Deposition is also influenced by particle morphology; high aspect-ratio fibers tend to align with airflow, enabling deeper penetration into the lungs compared to spherical particles of similar mass.

2.3. Dermal Exposure

Dermal exposure is comparatively less studied but may occur through contact with contaminated soil, water or personal care products having microbeads or exfoliating agents. Skin penetration of microplastics is generally considered limited due to the protective barrier provided by the stratum corneum [50]. However, under certain conditions, such as prolonged exposure, compromised skin integrity (e.g., eczema or wounds), or the presence of nano plastics, the potential for percutaneous absorption may increase [51]. Dermal exposure may also be relevant in occupational settings where workers handle polymer-rich dust or liquids. Additionally, MPs present in cosmetics, shampoos, and soaps may persist on the skin or accumulate in hair follicles or sweat ducts, although conclusive evidence of deep dermal penetration remains limited [52].

2.4. Vertical and Transgenerational Exposure

Recent evidence raises concerns about fetal exposure during critical developmental stages, suggesting that MPs, particularly nano plastics, may cross the placental barrier. Studies have identified plastic particles in human placental tissue, amniotic fluid, and even meconium, indicating in utero exposure [53,54,55,56]. Such early exposure may have long-term consequences mediated through epigenetic mechanisms, potentially affecting neurobehavioral development, metabolic programming, and immune function. Animal studies have shown that maternal exposure to MPs can lead to transgenerational effects, including reduced fertility, altered organ development, and abnormal behavioral patterns in offspring [57,58]. These findings highlighted the significance of incorporating perinatal and reproductive risk assessment frameworks.

2.5. Indirect and Combined Exposure Routes

In real-world conditions, humans and animals are exposed to MPs through multiple simultaneous pathways, often in combination with other environmental contaminants such as heavy metals, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) [59,60]. MPs can adsorb and concentrate these toxic substances on their surfaces and subsequently release them under physiological conditions [61]. This co-exposure mechanism may enhance the bioavailability and toxicity of associated chemicals. The effect is particularly significant in the gastrointestinal tract, where acidic pH and enzyme activity can promote desorption. Moreover, interactions between MPs and the gut, skin, or respiratory microbiome may influence human health by altering microbial composition, metabolic functions, and host immune responses [62]. MP-induced dysbiosis has been associated with increased intestinal permeability, systemic inflammation, and potentially neuroimmune disorders [63].

2.6. Distribution, Physicochemical Modifications, Metabolism and Biotransformation of Microplastics and Nanoplastics

Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) are systemically distributed throughout the body depending on particle size, surface chemistry, protein corona formation, and organ-specific phagocytic activity [64]. Unlike dissolved xenobiotics, these materials behave as colloidal particulates, and their biodistribution is governed by vascular dynamics and immune recognition. Plasma proteins such as albumin, fibrinogen, immunoglobulins, complement factors, and apolipoproteins rapidly adsorb onto NPs in the bloodstream, forming a biomolecular corona. This corona defines the biological identity of the particle and influences opsonization, endothelial interactions and cellular uptake [65]. Particles smaller than 100 nm tend to persist in circulation for several hours due to inefficient clearance, whereas larger particles (>500 nm) are rapidly recognized by the mononuclear phagocyte system and cleared within 24 h [66]. Liver Kupffer cells and splenic macrophages play a major role in the clearance of opsonized particles as part of the reticuloendothelial system.
Biodistribution studies under controlled exposure conditions all show dominance accumulation in the liver, with approximately 40–60% of MPs and 50–70% of NPs localized in hepatic tissue [67]. This reflects high hepatic blood flow and an abundant macrophage population. The spleen typically accumulates 10–15% of MPs and 15–25% of NPs due to its filtration function. Renal accumulation is comparatively low (5–10% for MPs and up to 15% for NPs), although nanoscale particles may pass through glomerular structures depending on size and surface charge [68]. Brain accumulation of MPs is minimal (<1%); however, NPs smaller than approx. ~50 nm can cross the blood–brain barrier, with reported penetration rates of 5–10% in animal models [68]. Pulmonary retention contributes 10–30% of the burden, particularly under inhalation exposure. Smaller particles exhibit wider systemic distribution due to enhanced endothelial penetration and less phagocytic clearance. Physicochemical transformations significantly influence these kinetics. The composition of the protein corona varies with the biological fluid and evolves dynamically through competitive protein exchange, thereby altering immune recognition, complement activation, and cellular internalization [69]. Environmental aging processes, such as ultraviolet exposure and oxidative weathering, introduce functional groups (e.g., carbonyls and hydroxyl groups) that enhance hydrophilicity and modify electrostatic properties. These changes enhance protein absorption, cellular uptake, and oxidative stress responses [70]. Weathered MPs have been shown to induce greater inflammation than pristine particles, highlighting the importance of environmental transformation prior to biological exposure.
The polymer backbone undergoes minimal metabolic modification. High-molecular-weight polymers such as polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, and polyethylene terephthalate are resistant to enzymatic degradation in mammalian systems [71]. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are unable to cleave polymer chains, and lysosomal conditions result in only minor surface alterations without significant degradation. Consequently, particle fate is largely determined by persistence rather than metabolic clearance [72]. However, embedded chemical additives represent an additional exposure pathway. Under physiological conditions, plasticizers, bisphenols and flame retardants may leach from particles, with rates influenced by polymer composition, surface area, temperature and pH. Once released, these additives undergo conventional absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion processes and may exert endocrine or toxic effects independently of the particle matrix [73]. Thus, systemic burden reflects a dual toxicokinetic profile comprising persistent particle accumulation and soluble additive exposure.

2.7. Bioaccumulation Kinetics, Excretion, Elimination Pathways and Mechanistic Implications of Toxicokinetics

Systemic absorption, tissue retention, and clearance efficacy strongly influence the bioaccumulation kinetics of MPs and NPs. For MPs in the 1–10 µm size range, systemic bioaccumulation is generally limited due to poor gastrointestinal absorption, typically estimated at 0.1–1.0% of the administered dose in experimental systems [74]. Most ingested MPs are excreted unchanged in feces, with only a small fraction translocating across intestinal barriers via paracellular pathways or uptake by specialized M cells in gut-associated lymphoid tissues. Retained MPs are primarily localized in the liver and intestinal immune compartments following phagocytic uptake, resulting in relatively low long-term systemic accumulation under typical exposure conditions.
In contrast, NPs (<100 nm) exhibit significantly greater bioaccumulation due to higher absorption efficiency and slower systemic clearance. Gastrointestinal uptake ranges from approximately 0.5–5% depending on particle characterization such as size, surface charge, and coating. Inhalation uptake is also higher for NPs (approximately 1–2%) compared to MPs (<0.5%). NPs have a plasma half-life of approximately 6–12 h [75] and can distribute to secondary organs once following systemic circulation. Sub-chronic rodent studies have reported retention for up to 30 days following repeated exposure, with particularly high accumulation in the liver [76,77]. The spleen also shows moderate accumulation due to its immune surveillance role. Notably, NPs smaller than ~50 nm have demonstrated measurable penetration across the blood–brain barrier, whereas MPs show negligible brain uptake. Continuous low-dose exposure to NPs may result in progressive tissue accumulation due to slow elimination rates, even at low absorption fractions.
Elimination pathways differ markedly between MPs and NPs. MPs are primarily excreted via feces, although excretion efficiency decreases for particles smaller than 1 µm due to increased tissue uptake [78]. Renal clearance is negligible for most NPs because the glomerular filtration threshold (~6–8 nm) excludes larger particles; only very small and well-dispersed NPs (~5–8 nm) can be excreted via urine [78]. Hepatobiliary excretion has been observed for certain NPs following hepatic uptake, facilitated by protein-mediated transport into bile canaliculi. However, this pathway is variable and depends on particle size, surface characteristics, and liver transport capacity [78].
These toxicokinetic differences have important mechanistic implications. Accumulation of MPs and especially NPs accumulation in the liver activates macrophages and Kupffer cells, triggering inflammasome pathways such as NLRP3, and promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) [79]. Increased NP burden in reticuloendothelial organs is associated with elevated levels of systemic inflammatory markers. Persistent endo lysosomal accumulation may destabilize membranes, generate reactive oxygen species, and activate intrinsic apo apoptotic signaling pathways. NPs are known to induce stronger apoptotic responses at lower concentrations compared to MPs [79]. The relative contribution of different exposure routes of microplastics, along with their major sources, is summarized in Figure 2.
Significant uncertainties remain in extrapolating experimental findings to human exposure scenarios. Estimated human exposure to MPs through diet and drinking water ranges from tens of thousands to millions of particles annually, corresponding to microgram-scale daily intake [80]. Airborne exposure contributes additional inhalation doses, particularly in indoor environments rich in synthetic fibers [81,82]. However, internal dose estimates remain uncertain due to limited human biomonitoring data. Detection of MPs in human blood, placenta and lung tissue confirms systemic exposure, but quantitative relationships between environmental exposure and tissue burden are not yet well established. Furthermore, experimental studies often employ higher concentrations to elicit observable biological responses with short timeframes, necessitating caution when extrapolating dose–response relationships to real-world exposure conditions.

3. Mechanisms of Toxicity

Microplastics (MPs), particularly at the nanoscale level, exert toxicological effects through multiple interconnected mechanisms, including chemical and biochemical alterations at cellular and systemic levels, as well as physical disruption of cell structures [83]. Key processes include oxidative stress, inflammation, endocrine disruption, genotoxicity, and metabolic dysregulation. Biological activity and distribution depend on particle size, morphology, surface chemistry, polymer type, and associated contaminants [84].
Experimental studies demonstrate that polystyrene nanoplastics increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α and IL-1β) in retinal and epithelial tissues, indicating activation of oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways. These effects are dose-dependent, with similar findings reported in mouse ocular surface models. Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based microplastics have also been shown to induce dose-dependent bioaccumulation and histopathological alterations in liver and gut tissues in aquatic models such as zebrafish.

3.1. Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance

Oxidative stress is one of the most frequently reported mechanisms of MP-induced toxicity across multiple organ systems. Internalized MPs or their surface-bound additives promote excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide anions (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radicals (OH), overwhelming antioxidant defense systems [85,86]. Upon cellular uptake, particularly for nanoplastics (<100 nm), particles interact with mitochondrial membranes and redox-sensitive signaling pathways, leading to lipid peroxidation, protein carbonylation, and nucleic acid damage, thereby compromising cellular integrity [87,88]. MPs and NPs may also disrupt the electron transport chain, impair ATP synthesis, and contribute to the self-replicating oxidative cycle. Additionally, oxidative stress activates signaling pathways associated with inflammation and apoptosis [16,89].

3.2. Inflammation and Cytokine Storm

MP exposure induces strong inflammatory responses. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors (TLR2 and TLR4), recognize MPs as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), activating signaling pathways such as NF-kB and MAPK (ERK, JNK, p38) [16,90]. This activation leads to upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and chemokines (MCP-1, CXCL1) [91]. MPs also promote activation of inflammasomes, particularly NLRP3, which facilitates caspase-1 activation and subsequent release of IL-1β and IL-18 [92,93]. In vitro studies using epithelial, hepatic, immune, and intestinal cell models (A549, HepG2, Caco-2, THP-1) demonstrate increased cytokine production following exposure to polystyrene, polyethylene and polypropylene particles [94,95]. Significantly inflammatory responses are observed at concentrations as low as 10 µg/mL) for NPs. In vivo rodent studies further confirm increased hepatic cytokine levels and Kupffer cell activation following oral MP exposure. Chronic low-grade inflammation induced by MPs is associated with metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, neurodegeneration, fibrosis, and carcinogenesis [96,97,98,99,100,101,102].

3.3. Apoptosis and Programmed Cell Death

MPs induce apoptosis primarily through the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway. Excess ROS generation leads to mitochondrial damage and release of cytochrome c, which forms an apoptosome with Apaf-1 and caspase-9, ultimately activating executioner caspases (caspase-3 and -7) [102,103]. Affected cell types include hepatocytes, neurons, and reproductive cells, with observed alterations in Bax/Bcl-2 ratios and mitochondrial membrane potential. Apoptotic effects are typically observed at concentrations of >10–50 µg/mL for MPs and at lower concentrations (1–5 µg/mL) for NPs, reflecting higher cellular uptake and toxicity of nanoscale particles [104,105]. Such size-dependent potency indicates enhanced cellular uptake, increased lysosomal localization, and greater oxidative stress generation by nanoscale particles. Repeated oral exposure to MPs in rodent models (typically 1–5 mg/kg/day over 4–8 weeks) has resulted in the presence of TUNEL-positive cells in the corpus callosum, altered expression of apoptosis-related genes, and mitochondrial dysfunction [105]. Dose–response relationships are evident, with higher doses correlating with more pronounced apoptotic signatures. Notably, oxidative stress appears to be central to this mechanism; elevated levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, and GSH) are associated with enhanced apoptotic activation. MPs have also been shown to influence biological pathways leading to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in certain models, which can induce apoptosis via activation of caspase-12 and CHOP [106,107]. Additionally, MPs may trigger ferroptosis or other forms of cell death at higher concentrations, depending on cell type and environmental conditions. Conversely, autophagy activation may initially exert protective effects but becomes detrimental when prolonged, leading to cellular senescence and impaired lysosomal function. Autophagic flux in response to MP exposure has been supported by the autophagy-related genes (ATGs) and markers such as p62 and LC3-II [108,109]. Dysregulation of these pathways may further influence inflammation, immune responses, cancer progression, genotoxicity and DNA damage. Although these findings demonstrated biological plausibility, more experimental exposure levels exceed typical environmental conditions, highlighting the need for chronic low-dose studies to better reflect human exposure scenarios.

3.4. Disruption of Cellular Membrane Integrity

Due to their abrasive surfaces and high surface-area-to-volume ratio, MPs have the potential to damage cell membranes. Interactions between MPs and phospholipid bilayers can lead to calcium ion imbalance, increased membrane permeability, and disruption of membrane integrity [110,111]. Polystyrene (PS) nanoplastics have been shown to penetrate lipid rafts and disrupt these critical structures involved in cell signaling, as demonstrated in studies using Caco-2 cell lines and artificial lipid membranes [112]. The adsorption of proteins onto MP surfaces (formation of a protein corona) further alters their interaction with cells, either promoting endocytosis or inducing phagocytic uptake by immune cells [113]. Depending on its composition and the biological environment, the protein corona may either mitigate or enhance particle reactivity. MP exposure has been linked to metabolic reprogramming, particularly in the liver and adipose tissues. Proteomic and metabolomic studies in exposed organisms indicate differential expression of genes associated with fatty acid β-oxidation, glycolysis, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Liver tissues of fish and rodents exposed to MPs demonstrated lipid droplet accumulation and steatosis, suggesting metabolic stress and early-stage non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [114,115]. These effects are mechanistically linked to disruption of key metabolic regulators such as PPAR, insulin signaling, and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathways. Additionally, MPs may indirectly affect energy metabolism through gut microbiota dysbiosis, including altered bile acid metabolism, short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) synthesis, and food absorption [116].

3.5. Endocrine Disruption

Microplastics can act as carriers of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, nonylphenol and heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. These compounds interfere with hormonal signaling by mimicking or antagonizing endogenous hormones [117]. In reproductive systems, MPs interact with cellular receptors and alter the transcription of steroidogenic enzymes such as CYP19A1, StAR, and 3β-HSD [118]. Several studies have reported that MP exposure leads to altered testosterone and estrogen levels, resulting in disrupted estrous cycles, reduced fertility, and developmental abnormalities. MPs also affect thyroid and insulin regulation. In zebrafish models, polystyrene nano plastics disrupt the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis, reducing sex steroid levels (e.g., 17β-estradiol and testosterone) and impairing gametogenesis [119,120]. These findings are supported by rodent studies demonstrating reduced sperm quality, testicular atrophy, and altered estrous cycles following MP exposure [121,122,123,124].

3.6. Crosstalk Between Mechanisms

There is a significant interaction among these toxicological pathways rather than mutual independence. For example, mitochondrial damage promotes both apoptosis and autophagy, while oxidative stress amplifies inflammatory signaling via the ROS-NF-κB axis. Similarly, DNA damage and endocrine disruption are often interconnected, particularly in relation to reproductive outcomes [125]. Therefore, developing a comprehensive model of MP-induced toxicity requires an integrated understanding of these interconnected mechanisms. The major molecular mechanisms underlying microplastic-induced toxicity, including oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and endocrine disruption, are summarized in Figure 3.

4. Organ-Specific Toxicity of Microplastics

After ingestion, inhalation, or dermal exposure, microplastics (MPs) can cross epithelial barriers, enter the bloodstream, and accumulate in various organs. Their size, shape, polymer composition, surface properties, and co-contaminant load influence their organotropism and subsequent toxic effects. Numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that MPs exert pro-inflammatory, oxidative, endocrine-disrupting, and cytotoxic effects across multiple biological systems.

4.1. Gastrointestinal Tract

The primary route of microplastic exposure in humans is through the gastrointestinal system, mainly via contaminated food and water. MPs alter mucosal architecture by disrupting tight junction integrity and interacting with gut epithelial cells. Repeated oral exposure to polystyrene (PS) MPs (≤5 µm) has been shown to cause epithelial cell loss and villus atrophy in mice, a condition often referred to as “leaky gut syndrome” [126,127]. This compromised epithelial barrier facilitates systemic translocation of MPs and increases susceptibility to bacterial and endotoxin penetration. Additionally, MPs disrupt the gut microbiota, a key regulator of host metabolism and immunity. Dysbiosis, characterized by altered Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios and reduced microbial diversity, is commonly reported [128]. A summary of experimental studies demonstrating microplastic-induced gastrointestinal toxicity across different model organisms is presented in Table 1 [129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136]. Secondary effects include altered bile acid metabolism, reduced short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and increased intestinal tract inflammation. Furthermore, MPs may interact with co-contaminants such as heavy metals and endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), exacerbating intestinal barrier dysfunction and microbial pathogenicity.

4.2. Liver

The liver, a central organ for metabolism and detoxification, is a primary site of MP accumulation due to its role in filtering intestinal blood via the portal vein. Histopathological studies have reported hepatic sinusoidal congestion, hepatocellular ballooning, lipid droplet accumulation (steatosis), and inflammatory infiltration following MP exposure [68,137]. Experimental studies in mice, zebrafish, and human hepatocyte models demonstrate hepatocellular degeneration, fibrosis, and inflammation [138]. MPs induce hepatotoxicity primarily through oxidative stress (elevated ROS and MDA levels), reduced antioxidant defenses (SOD, CAT, GSH), and mitochondrial dysfunction. These processes activate pro-inflammatory pathways such as NF-kB and MAPK, resulting in increased cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α) and COX-2. Additionally, MPs disrupt lipid metabolism through deregulation of genes such as PPARα, SREBP-1c, and CYP7A1, leading to lipid accumulation and NAFLD-like phenotypes. Sub-chronic rodent studies have shown that oral exposure to PS MPs or NPs (0.1–10 mg/kg/day for 4–12 weeks) results in hepatic steatosis, increased triglyceride levels, oxidative stress, and inflammation, hallmarks of early-stage NAFLD [77,139]. Molecular evidence further indicates increased lipogenesis (upregulation of SREBP-1c and FAS), and reduced fatty acid β -oxidation (downregulation of PRARα). MPs also interfere with bile acid metabolism and cytochrome P450 enzyme activity, further impairing metabolic homeostasis. A summary of key studies highlighting microplastic-induced hepatotoxicity and associated molecular pathways is presented in Figure 4.

4.3. Kidneys

The renal system, responsible for blood filtration and xenobiotic elimination, is highly susceptible to MP-induced toxicity. Animal studies indicate that prolonged exposure to MPs leads to glomerular hypertrophy, interstitial edema, and impaired renal function, as evidenced by increased serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. MP uptake by renal tubular epithelial cells oxidative stress and reduces nephroprotective proteins such as Nrf2 and HO-1. MPs disrupt glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption, resulting in proteinuria and electrolyte imbalance. Mechanistically, nephrotoxicity is driven by oxidative stress (increased NOX2 and iNOS) and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and MCP-1). A summary of experimental studies highlighting microplastic-induced renal toxicity across different model organisms is presented in Table 2 [140,141,142,143,144,145]. Apoptosis is evidenced by Caspase-9 activation and DNA fragmentation. MPs also influence the renin–angiotensin system (RAS), with upregulation of AGT and ACE genes, suggesting a potential link to hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, MPs impair autophagy pathways, leading to lysosomal dysfunction and cellular degeneration.

4.4. Reproductive Organs

Reproductive toxicity induced by MPs is an increasingly significant concern, particularly due to their potential for endocrine disruption and transmission across generations. Exposure to PS-MP has been shown to impair spermatogenesis, reduce testicular weight, and decrease sperm motility and viability in male rats [130]. These effects are primarily mediated through disruption of the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis, downregulation of steroidogenic genes (e.g., StAR, Cyp11a1, and 3β-HSD), and oxidative damage to Sertoli and Leydig cells. In females, reproductive toxicity is characterized by ovarian follicular atresia, disrupted estrous cycles, and reduced oocyte quality. MPs have also been shown to cross the placental barrier, potentially leading to impaired fetal development, low birth weight, and neurodevelopmental abnormalities [146]. Furthermore, MPs can modulate oxidative stress pathways and induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in granulosa cells, while interfering with estrogen receptor signaling. Transgenerational studies suggest that MP exposure may induce epigenetic modifications, including altered methylation of reproductive gene promoters [147]. MPs also disrupt endocrine homeostasis by interacting with hormone receptors and acting as carriers of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), such as bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) [148]. These chemicals mimic or antagonize endogenous hormones, affecting both steroidal and peptide hormone pathways. Additionally, MPs may impact the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to altered stress responses [149]. Changes in circulating corticosterone levels and adrenal histoarchitecture observed in exposed animal models further support the presence of central neuroendocrine disruption [150]. A summary of experimental studies demonstrating microplastic-induced reproductive toxicity across different model organisms is presented in Table 3 [151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160].

4.5. Central Nervous System

Microplastic-induced Neurotoxicity arises from modulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways, leading to damage in the central nervous system (CNS). Due to their small size, MPs, particularly nanoplastics, can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Polystyrene nanoplastics (50–100 nm) have been detected in brain tissues following oral and intranasal exposure in animal models. These particles induce microglial activation, neuroinflammation, and neuronal damage. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β), oxidative stress markers (NOX4, HO-1) and apoptotic proteins (caspase-3, Bax) have been observed in cortical and hippocampal regions [161]. Behavioral abnormalities, including reduced exploratory activity, anxiety-like behavior, and cognitive impairments (e.g., in object recognition and spatial memory), further confirm the neurotoxic potential of MPs [19,161,162]. A summary of experimental studies demonstrating microplastic-induced central nervous system toxicity across different model organisms is presented in Table 4 [163,164,165,166,167,168]. In in vitro models, MPs impair synaptic plasticity by reducing brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression and disrupting calcium signaling pathways.

4.6. Cardiopulmonary System

Although ingestion is the primary route of MP exposure, inhalation of airborne microplastics has emerged as a significant concern, particularly in urban and occupational settings. Inhaled MPs deposit in the bronchioles and alveoli, where they interact with pulmonary epithelial cells and macrophages [169]. Experimental inhalation studies in rodents have demonstrated alveolar thickening, goblet cell hyperplasia, fibrosis, and reduced pulmonary compliance. Histological changes include alveolar septal thickening, inflammatory cell infiltration, and epithelial metaplasia. PS and PE fibers have been shown to induce oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in bronchial epithelial cells, increasing IL-8, TGF-β1, and NF-κB signaling [170]. MPs promote epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and fibroblast proliferation via TGF-β1/Smad signaling, contributing to pulmonary fibrosis. In vitro studies using human bronchial epithelial cells have shown that nanoplastics disrupt tight junction proteins (e.g., occluding, claudin-1), compromising the integrity of the air–blood barrier and facilitating systemic translocation [171,172]. Chronic exposure may increase the risk of asthma, COPD, and pulmonary carcinogenesis due to sustained inflammation and DNA damage [173]. Cardiotoxic effects are primarily secondary to systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and lipid dysregulation. In zebrafish and rodent models, MPs have been associated with arrhythmias, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial apoptosis [174]. Endothelial cells exposed to MPs exhibit reduced nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, impaired vasodilation, and increased expression of adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1), suggesting atherogenic potential [175]. Emerging evidence indicates that MPs are present in human blood and vascular tissues, contributing to oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling pathways involved in cardiovascular diseases. Chronic has been linked to endothelial dysfunction, cardiac hypertrophy, and altered calcium signaling, potentially leading to arrhythmogenic outcomes [176,177,178]. MPs may also act synergistically with other risk factors (e.g., high-fat diet, smoking) to accelerate atherosclerosis [176,179]. A summary of experimental studies demonstrating microplastic-induced cardiopulmonary toxicity across different model organisms is presented in Table 5 [180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193].

4.7. Immune System

Microplastics act as immunomodulatory agents, distributing both innate and adaptive immune responses. In vitro studies demonstrate that MPs activate macrophages and dendritic cells, leading to increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and activation of the NLRP) inflammasome [194,195,196]. However, chronic exposure may lead to immune tolerance, bone marrow suppression, disrupted hematopoiesis, and reduced counts of red and white blood cells [197]. MPs induce oxidative stress and inflammatory signaling (IL-1β, IL-6, IFN-γ) in stromal and progenitor cells, thereby impairing immune function [198,199,200]. Humoral responses are also affected by altered IgA and IgG levels and antigen presentation. MPs have been associated with autoimmune responses, potentially through molecular mimicry or by acting as haptens when bound to adsorbed pollutants. A summary of experimental studies demonstrating microplastic-induced immunological toxicity across different model organisms is presented in Table 6 [201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208]. Peripheral immunotoxic effects include lymphoid organ atrophy (spleen, thymus), reduced antibody production, and increased susceptibility to infections. MPs also alter immune cell polarization (e.g., Th1/Th2, M1/M2 macrophages), maintaining a chronic inflammatory state via TLR4/NLRP3 signaling mechanisms.

4.8. Organ Cross-Talk and Multisystem Impact

Microplastic toxicity is not confined to a single organ system but involves complex organ interactions mediated through endocrine, immune and nervous systems. These interactions contribute to synergistic pathologies. For example, hepatic inflammation may exacerbate cardiovascular dysfunction through systemic cytokine release, while gut barrier disruption (“leaky gut”) may promote neuroinflammation and behavioral alterations via the gut–brain axis. The ability of MPs to act as environmental contaminants (e.g., heavy metals, antibiotics) further amplifies their toxicological impact [207,208]. These interconnected effects highlight the importance of evaluating MP toxicity within an integrated systems biology framework.

4.9. Brief Summary

Organ-specific toxicity of microplastics is driven by common molecular mechanisms, including oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and activation of pro-inflammatory pathways such as NF-κB and MAPK. These processes lead to apoptosis, endocrine disruption, and metabolic imbalance in exposed tissues. Structural and functional alterations have been observed in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, kidney, reproductive organs, central nervous system, cardiopulmonary system and immune system. These effects are further amplified by systemic translocation and barrier dysfunction. Chronic exposure may result in cumulative cellular damage and persistent inflammatory signaling. Additionally, inter-organ cross-talks mediated through immune and endocrine pathways further contribute to disease progression. In general, MP toxicity should be considered a multisystem, mechanism-driven health issue rather than isolated specific damage.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

Microplastics (MPs) are now ubiquitous in the environment, and their potential impacts on human health are increasingly evident. Their small size, environmental persistence, and ability to adsorb and transport toxic contaminants enable them to cross biological barriers and accumulate in various organs. Experimental studies across mammalian and aquatic models demonstrate that MPs and nanoplastics (NPs) induce oxidative stress, inflammation, endocrine disruption, genotoxicity, and immunological dysregulation. Organ-specific toxicities, including hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and cardiovascular dysfunction, have been widely reported. Despite significant mechanistic insights, several knowledge gaps remain. Most toxicological studies rely on short-term, high-dose exposure models, limiting their relevance to real-world human exposure. Long-term effects of chronic low-dose exposure, including bioaccumulation dynamics and transgenerational impacts, remain poorly understood. Standardization of MP characterization and exposure assessment is another major challenge. Variations in particle size, polymer type, surface properties, and reporting metrics hinder cross-study comparisons. Harmonized reporting standards-including particle number, size distribution, surface area, and environmental aging conditions-are urgently needed. Future research should focus on environmentally relevant exposure models, human-relevant systems (e.g., organoids), and advanced toxicokinetic modeling to better understand internal dose–response relationships. Integration of omics approaches and biomonitoring studies will be essential to bridge experimental and epidemiological findings.
Preventive strategies should emphasize the reduction of microplastic sources, improved waste management, the development of safer biodegradable materials, and global regulatory coordination.
In conclusion, although substantial progress has been made in understanding MP toxicity, a unified research framework integrating standardized methodologies of exposure, chronic exposure studies, and human-relevant models is essential to inform risk assessment, regulatory policies, and mitigation strategies for protecting human and environmental health.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C., Y.K.A. and S.A.; methodology, V.R., R.S. and AK.; software, A.K., S.K., P.S., D.K. and R.C.; validation, Y.K.A., V.R., R.S., D.K. and P.S.; formal analysis, N.D., S.A., Y.K.A. and P.S.; investigation, Y.K.A. and R.C.; resources, P.S., J.K.B., A.K., D.K. and S.A.; data curation, V.R., R.C. and S.A.; writing—original draft preparation, V.R., Y.K.A., J.K.B., A.K. and R.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.K.A., R.C. and S.A.; visualization, A.K. and P.S.; supervision, Y.K.A.; project administration, V.R. and Y.K.A.; funding acquisition, S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tsakona, M.; Baker, E.; Rucevska, L.; Maes, T.; Appelquist, L.R.; Macmillan-Lawler, M.; Harris, P.; Raubenheimer, K.; Langeard, R.; Savelli-Soderberg, H.; et al. Drowning in Plastics—Marine Litter and Plastic Waste: Vital Graphics; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bui, X.-T.; Vo, T.-D.-H.; Nguyen, P.-T.; Nguyen, V.-T.; Dao, T.-S.; Nguyen, P.-D. Microplastics Pollution in Wastewater: Characteristics, Occurrence and Removal Technologies. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 19, 101013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Duis, K.; Coors, A. Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: Sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2016, 28, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Andrady, A.L. The plastic in microplastics: A review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 119, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Amelia, T.S.M.; Khalik, W.M.A.W.M.; Ong, M.C.; Shao, Y.T.; Pan, H.-J.; Bhubalan, K. Marine microplastics as vectors of major ocean pollutants and its hazards to the marine ecosystem and humans. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2021, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Vethaak, A.D.; Legler, J. Microplastics and Human Health. Science 2021, 371, 672–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Yuan, Z.; Nag, R.; Cummins, E. Human health concerns regarding microplastics in the aquatic environment—From marine to food systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 823, 153730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Kadac-Czapska, K.; Knez, E.; Grembecka, M. Food and human safety: The impact of microplastics. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 64, 3502–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Visileanu, E.; Altmann, K.; Stepa, R.; Haiducu, M.; Miclea, P.T.; Vladu, A.; Dondea, F.; Grosu, M.C.; Scarlat, R. Comparative analysis of airborne particle concentrations in textile industry environments throughout the workday. Microplastics 2025, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Yong, C.Q.Y.; Valiyaveettil, S.; Tang, B.L. Toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics in mammalian systems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Abbas, G.; Ahmed, U.; Ahmad, M.A. Impact of microplastics on human health: Risks, diseases, and affected body systems. Microplastics 2025, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Chan, G.G.; Koch, C.M.; Connors, L.H. Blood proteomic profiling in inherited (ATTRm) and acquired (ATTRwt) forms of transthyretin-associated cardiac myloidosis. J. Proteome Res. 2017, 16, 1659–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Hwang, J.; Choi, D.; Han, S.; Choi, J.; Hong, J.; Lee, J.; Choi, H. Potential Toxicity of Polystyrene Microplastic Particles. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Bai, X.; Acharya, K. Removal of Seven Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) from Municipal Wastewater Effluents by a Freshwater Green Alga. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 247, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, T.; Cui, J.; Xu, R.; Cao, J.; Guo, M.Y. Microplastics induced inflammation and apoptosis via ferroptosis and the NF-κB pathway in carp. Aquat. Toxicol. 2023, 262, 106659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Yang, W.; Jannatun, N.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, G.; Chen, C.; Li, Y. Impacts of microplastics on immunity. Front. Toxicol. 2022, 4, 956885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Awuchi, C.G.; Awuchi, C.G. Physiological effects of plastic wastes on the endocrine system (Bisphenol A, Phthalates, Bisphenol S, PBDEs, TBBPA). Int. J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 2019, 4, 11–29. [Google Scholar]
  18. Patisaul, H.B. Endocrine disruption and reproductive disorders: Impacts on sexually dimorphic neuroendocrine pathways. Reproduction 2021, 162, F111–F130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Araújo, A.M.; Mota, C.; Ramos, H.; Faria, M.A.; Carvalho, M.; Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O. The Neurotoxic Threat of Micro- and Nanoplastics: Evidence from In Vitro and In Vivo Models. Arch. Toxicol. 2025, 99, 3505–3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Sharma, R.K.; Kumari, U.; Kumar, S. Impact of microplastics on pregnancy and fetal development: A systematic review. Cureus 2024, 16, e60712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Medley, E.A.; Spratlen, M.J.; Yan, B.; Herbstman, J.B.; Deyssenroth, M.A. A Systematic Review of the Placental Translocation of Micro- and Nanoplastics. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2023, 10, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Zolotova, N.; Kosyreva, A.; Dzhalilova, D.; Fokichev, N.; Makarova, O. Harmful effects of microplastic pollution on animal health: A literature review. PeerJ 2022, 10, e13503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Borga, K.; Fisk, A.T.; Hoekstra, P.E.; Muir, D.C.G. Biological and Chemical Factors of Importance in the Bioaccumulation and Trophic Transfer of Persistent Organochlorine Contaminants in Arctic Marine Food Webs. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2367–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Martinez Rodriguez, A.; Kratina, P.; Jones, J.I. Microplastic pollution and nutrient enrichment shift the diet of freshwater macroinvertebrates. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 359, 124540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Ghosh, T. Microplastics bioaccumulation in fish: Its potential toxic effects on hematology, immune response, neurotoxicity, oxidative stress, growth, and reproductive dysfunction. Toxicol. Rep. 2024, 14, 101854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Tumwesigye, E.; Nnadozie, C.F.; Akamagwuna, F.C.; Noundou, X.S.; Nyakairu, G.W.; Odume, O.N. Microplastics as vectors of chemical contaminants and biological agents in freshwater ecosystems: Current knowledge status and future perspectives. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 330, 121829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Xu, J.-L.; Lin, X.; Wang, J.J.; Gowen, A.A. A review of potential human health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Rajak, S.; Shahi, A.; Yadav, A.; Medhe, P.; Sinha, R.A. Microplastics in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: An emerging threat to liver health. World J. Hepatol. 2025, 17, 111198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Maurya, D.; Katarkar, A.; Kulurkar, P.M.; Deshpande, S.A.; Krishnamurthi, K.; Sivanesan, S. Polyethylene microplastics induced hepatic oxidative stress and early non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Wistar rats. Indian J. Anim. Res. 2025, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Ziani, K.; Ionița-Mindrican, C.B.; Mititelu, M.; Neacșu, S.M.; Negrei, C.; Moroșan, E.; Draganescu, D.; Preda, O.T. Microplastics: A Real Global Threat for Environment and Food Safety: A State of the Art Review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Nawab, A.; Ahmad, M.; Khan, M.T.; Nafees, M.; Khan, I.; Ihsanullah, I. Human exposure to microplastics: A review on exposure routes and public health impacts. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2024, 16, 100487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Prata, J.C. Microplastics and human health: Integrating pharmacokinetics. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 53, 1489–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Ragusa, A.; Svelato, A.; Santacroce, C.; Catalano, P.; Notarstefano, V.; Carnevali, O.; Papa, F.; Rongioletti, M.C.A.; Baiocco, F.; Draghi, S.; et al. Plasticenta: First evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environ. Int. 2021, 146, 106274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Leslie, H.A.; van Velzen, M.J.M.; Brandsma, S.H.; Vethaak, A.D.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J.; Lamoree, M.H. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environ. Int. 2022, 163, 107199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Aydın, R.B.; Yozukmaz, A.; Şener, İ.; Temiz, F.; Giannetto, D. Occurrence of microplastics in most consumed fruits and vegetables from Turkey and public risk assessment for consumers. Life 2023, 13, 1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Quilliam, R.S.; Pow, C.J.; Shilla, D.J.; Mwesiga, J.J.; Shilla, D.A.; Woodford, L. Microplastics in Agriculture-A Potential Novel Mechanism for the Delivery of Human Pathogens onto Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1152419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Cox, K.D.; Covernton, G.A.; Davies, H.L.; Dower, J.F.; Juanes, F.; Dudas, S.E. Human consumption of microplastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 7068–7074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Park, J.I.; Cho, S.W.; Kang, J.H.; Park, T.E. Intestinal Peyer’s patches: Structure, function, and in vitro modeling. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2023, 20, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Habumugisha, T.; Zhang, Z.; Uwizewe, C.; Yan, C.; Ndayishimiye, J.C.; Rehman, A.; Zhang, X. Toxicological review of micro- and nano-plastics in aquatic environments: Risks to ecosystems, food web dynamics and human health. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 278, 116426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Dong, X.; Liu, X.; Hou, Q.; Wang, Z. From natural environment to animal tissues: A review of microplastics (nanoplastics) translocation and hazards studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 855, 158686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Ahmad, M.; Chen, J.; Khan, M.T.; Yu, Q.; Phairuang, W.; Furuuchi, M.; Ali, S.W.; Nawab, A.; Panyametheekul, S. Sources, analysis, and health implications of atmospheric microplastics. Emerg. Contam. 2023, 9, 100233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Chen, G.; Li, Y.; Wang, J. Human health effects of airborne microplastics. In Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; Volume 100, pp. 185–223. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jahanzaib, M.; Sharma, S.; Park, D. Microplastics comparison of indoor and outdoor air and ventilation rate effect in outskirts of the Seoul metropolitan city. Emerg. Contam. 2025, 11, 100408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Patti, A.; Cicala, G.; Acierno, D. Eco-sustainability of the textile production: Waste recovery and current recycling in the composites world. Polymers 2021, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Kreiss, K. Occupational lung disease: From case reports to prevention. Chest 2013, 143, 1529–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Xing, Y.F.; Xu, Y.H.; Shi, M.H.; Lian, Y.X. The impact of PM2.5 on the human respiratory system. J. Thorac. Dis. 2016, 8, E69–E74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Saha, S.C.; Saha, G. Effect of microplastics deposition on human lung airways: A review with computational benefits and challenges. Heliyon 2024, 10, e24355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Vasse, G.F.; Melgert, B.N. Microplastic and plastic pollution: Impact on respiratory disease and health. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2024, 33, 230226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Chen, Q.; Gao, J.; Yu, H.; Su, H.; Yang, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, Y.; Hollert, H.; Shi, H.; et al. An emerging role of microplastics in the etiology of lung ground glass nodules. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2022, 34, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Menichetti, A.; Mordini, D.; Montalti, M. Penetration of microplastics and nanoparticles through skin: Effects of size, shape, and surface chemistry. J. Xenobiotics 2025, 15, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Larese Filon, F.; Bello, D.; Cherrie, J.W.; Sleeuwenhoek, A.; Spaan, S.; Brouwer, D.H. Occupational dermal exposure to nanoparticles and nano-enabled products: Part I—Factors affecting skin absorption. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 536–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Aristizabal-Torres, M.; Jiménez-Orrego, K.; Caicedo-León, M.; Páez-Cárdenas, L.; Castellanos-García, I.; Villalba-Moreno, D.; Ramírez-Zuluaga, L.; Hsu, J.; Jaller, J.; Gold, M. Microplastics in dermatology: Potential effects on skin homeostasis. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2024, 23, e16167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Zurub, R.E.; Cariaco, Y.; Wade, M.G.; Bainbridge, S.A. Microplastics exposure: Implications for human fertility, pregnancy and child health. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 14, 1330396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Halfar, J.; Cabanova, K.; Vavra, K.; Delongova, P.; Motyka, O.; Spacek, R.; Kukutschoa, J.; Simetka, O.; Heviankova, S. Microplastics and additives in patients with preterm birth: The first evidence of their presence in both human amniotic fluid and placenta. Chemosphere 2023, 343, 140301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Liu, S.; Lin, G.; Liu, X.; Yang, R.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Chen, B.; Dong, R. Detection of various microplastics in placentas, meconium, infant feces, breastmilk and infant formula: A pilot prospective study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 854, 158699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Braun, T.; Ehrlich, L.; Henrich, W.; Koeppel, S.; Lomako, I.; Schwabl, P.; Liebmann, B. Detection of microplastic in human placenta and meconium in a clinical setting. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Van Cauwenbergh, O.; Di Serafino, A.; Tytgat, J.; Soubry, A. Transgenerational epigenetic effects from male exposure to endocrine-disrupting compounds: A systematic review on research in mammals. Clin. Epigenet. 2020, 12, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Budhwar, M.; Mehra, S.; Sharma, M.; Ahsan, A.U.; Chopra, M. Unveiling micro-nanoplastics (MNPs)-induced developmental toxicity, transgenerational transport and associated signaling pathways. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2025, 17, 100581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Khalid, N.; Aqeel, M.; Noman, A.; Khan, S.M.; Akhter, N. Interactions and effects of microplastics with heavy metals in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 290, 118104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Al-Emran, M.; Nayem, M.J. Vector effects of microplastics on organic pollutants: Sorption–desorption and bioaccumulation kinetics. Chemosphere 2025, 388, 144698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Li, M.; Ma, W.; Fang, J.K.H.; Mo, J.; Li, L.; Pan, M.; Li, R.; Zeng, X.; Lai, K.P. A review on the combined toxicological effects of microplastics and their attached pollutants. Emerg. Contam. 2025, 11, 100486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Bora, S.S.; Gogoi, R.; Sharma, M.R.; Anshu; Borah, M.P.; Deka, P.; Bora, J.; Naorem, R.S.; Das, J.; Teli, A.B. Microplastics and human health: Unveiling the gut microbiome disruption and chronic disease risks. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1492759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Chen, X.; Zhuang, J.; Chen, Q.; Xu, L.; Yue, X.; Qiao, D. Polyvinyl chloride microplastics induced gut barrier dysfunction, microbiota dysbiosis and metabolism disorder in adult mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 241, 113809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Snehamayee, N.; Somya, S.; Kumar, S.C.; Niranjan, M.; Ranjan, S.B.; Kumar, M.N. Microplastics and human health: A comprehensive review on exposure pathways, toxicity, and emerging risks. Microplastics 2026, 5, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Tenzer, S.; Docter, D.; Kuharev, J.; Musyanovych, A.; Fetz, V.; Hecht, R.; Schlenk, F.; Fischer, D.; Kiouptsi, K.; Reinhardt, C.; et al. Rapid formation of plasma protein corona critically affects nanoparticle pathophysiology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Lu, B.; Wang, J.; Hendriks, A.J.; Nolte, T.M. Clearance of nanoparticles from blood: Effects of hydrodynamic size and surface coatings. Environ. Sci. Nano 2024, 11, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Yin, J.; Ju, Y.; Qian, H.; Wang, J.; Miao, X.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, L.; Ye, L. Nanoplastics and microplastics may be damaging our livers. Toxics 2022, 10, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Malafeev, K. The cytotoxicity of biodegradable microplastics and nanoplastics: Current status and research prospects. Microplastics 2025, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Akhter, M.H.; Khalilullah, H.; Gupta, M.; Alfaleh, M.A.; Alhakamy, N.A.; Riadi, Y.; Md, S. Impact of protein corona on the biological identity of nanomedicine: Understanding the fate of nanomaterials in the biological milieu. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Li, C.; Jiang, B.; Guo, J.; Sun, C.; Shi, C.; Huang, S.; Liu, W.; Wu, C.; Zhang, Y. Aging process of microplastics in aquatic environments: Aging pathway, characteristic change, compound effect, and environmentally persistent free radicals formation. Water 2022, 14, 3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Campanale, C.; Massarelli, C.; Savino, I.; Locaputo, V.; Uricchio, V.F. A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Tarara, M.; Ahuja, S.; Mellies, J.L. A cytochrome P450 facilitates polyethylene metabolism in a microbial community. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Wang, Z.; Li, N.; Ding, Y.; Li, N.; Su, M.; Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Sha, C.; Xia, B.; et al. Microplastics and human health: Exposure pathways, toxicity mechanisms, and future research challenges. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 118807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Wright, S.L.; Kelly, F.J. Plastic and human health: A micro issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6634–6647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Walczak, A.P.; Hendriksen, P.J.M.; Woutersen, R.A.; van der Zande, M.; Undas, A.K.; Helsdingen, R.; van den Berg, H.H.J.; Rietjens, I.M.C.M.; Bouwmeester, H. Bioavailability and biodistribution of differently charged polystyrene nanoparticles upon oral exposure in rats. J. Nanopart. Res. 2015, 17, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  76. Deng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lemos, B.; Ren, H. Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Liu, G.; Feng, M.; Tayyab, M.; Gong, J.; Zhang, M.; Yang, M.; Lin, K. Direct and efficient reduction of perfluorooctanoic acid using bimetallic catalyst supported on carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Wu, P.; Lin, S.; Cao, G.; Wu, J.; Jin, H.; Wang, C.; Wong, M.H.; Yang, Z.; Cai, Z. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity of microplastics in the human body and health implications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 437, 129361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Chen, X.; Xuan, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhu, M.; Xu, J.; Chen, J. Polystyrene nanoplastics induce intestinal and hepatic inflammation through activation of NF-κB/NLRP3 pathways and related gut–liver axis in mice. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 935, 173458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Zhao, J.; Gomes, D.; Jin, L.; Mathis, S.P.; Li, X.; Rouchka, E.C.; Bodduluri, H.; Conklin, D.J.; O’Toole, T.E. Polystyrene bead ingestion promotes adiposity and cardiometabolic disease in mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 232, 113239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Dris, R.; Gasperi, J.; Saad, M.; Mirande, C.; Tassin, B. Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of microplastics in the environment? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 104, 290–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Yamaguchi, M.; Hirai, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Sumi, T.; Miyajima, M.; Mishina, T.; Yamada, G.; Otsuka, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Kojima, T.; et al. Fibroblastic Foci, Covered with Alveolar Epithelia Exhibiting Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition, Destroy Alveolar Septa by Disrupting Blood Flow in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Lab. Investig. 2017, 97, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Aliya, S.; Alhammadi, M.; Ilangovan, S.; Han, S.; Tamang, S.; Son, B.; Lee, H.U.; Huh, Y.S. Microplastics: An emerging environmental risk factor for gut microbiota dysbiosis and cancer development? Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2025, 7, 706–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Alijagic, A.; Suljević, D.; Fočak, M.; Sulejmanović, J.; Šehović, E.; Särndahl, E.; Engwall, M. The triple exposure nexus of microplastic particles, plastic-associated chemicals, and environmental pollutants from a human health perspective. Environ. Int. 2024, 188, 108736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  85. Tripathy, B.C.; Oelmüller, R. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Jeong, C.B.; Won, E.J.; Kang, H.M.; Lee, M.C.; Hwang, D.S.; Hwang, U.K.; Zhou, B.; Souissi, S.; Lee, S.J.; Shin, K.H.; et al. Microplastic size-dependent toxicity, oxidative stress induction, and p-JNK and p-p38 activation in the monogonont rotifer (Brachionus koreanus). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 8849–8857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Hu, M.; Palić, D. Micro- and nano-plastics activation of oxidative and inflammatory adverse outcome pathways. Redox Biol. 2020, 37, 101620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Wu, Q.; Cao, J.; Liu, X.; Zhu, X.; Huang, C.; Wang, X.; Song, Y. Micro(nano)-plastics exposure induced programmed cell death and corresponding influence factors. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 921, 171230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Lazaridis, K.N.; Koutsari, C.; Samsonraj, R.M. Microplastics and nanoplastics and the digestive system. Gastro Hep Adv. 2025, 4, 100694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Kumar, V. Toll-like receptors in sepsis-associated cytokine storm and their endogenous negative regulators as future immunomodulatory targets. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 89, 107087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Zhang, J.M.; An, J. Cytokines, Inflammation, and Pain. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2007, 45, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Kelley, N.; Jeltema, D.; Duan, Y.; He, Y. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: An Overview of Mechanisms of Activation and Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Mahmud, F.; Sarker, D.B.; Jocelyn, J.A.; Sang, Q.-X.A. Molecular and Cellular Effects of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Focus on Inflammation and Senescence. Cells 2024, 13, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Kadac-Czapska, K.; Osko, J.; Knez, E.; Grembecka, M. Microplastics and Oxidative Stress-Current Problems and Prospects. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Kowalczyk, P.; Ligas, B.; Skrzypczak, D.; Mikula, K.; Izydorczyk, G.; Witek-Krowiak, A.; Moustakas, K.; Chojnacka, K. Biosorption as a Method of Biowaste Valorization to Feed Additives: RSM Optimization. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 268, 115937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Ye, Y.; Escames, G.; Lei, W.; Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Jing, T.; Yao, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Acuña-Castroviejo, D.; et al. The NLRP3 Inflammasome: Contributions to Inflammation-Related Diseases. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2023, 28, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  97. Lu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Jiang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Geng, J.; Ding, L.; Ren, H. Uptake and Accumulation of Polystyrene Microplastics in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Toxic Effects in Liver. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 4054–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  98. Han, S.; Bang, J.; Choi, D.; Hwang, J.; Kim, T.; Oh, Y.; Hwang, Y.; Choi, J.; Hong, J. Surface Pattern Analysis of Microplastics and Their Impact on Human-Derived Cells. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020, 2, 4541–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Shen, Y.; Fan, N.; Ma, S.X.; Cheng, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, G. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Pathogenesis, Diseases, Prevention, and Therapy. MedComm 2025, 6, e70168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Zhao, M.; Chu, J.; Feng, S.; Guo, C.; Xue, B.; He, K.; Li, L. Immunological Mechanisms of Inflammatory Diseases Caused by Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: A Review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 164, 114985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Cheng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Bai, L.; Cui, J. Microplastics: An Often-Overlooked Issue in the Transition from Chronic Inflammation to Cancer. J. Transl. Med. 2024, 22, 5731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Guo, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, S.; Sooranna, S.R.; Shu, F.; Li, G. Long-Term Exposure to Microplastics Promotes Early-Stage Hepatocarcinogenesis Induced by Diethylnitrosamine in Rats by Modulation of Their Gut Microbiota. Toxics 2025, 13, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Porter, A.G.; Jänicke, R.U. Emerging Roles of Caspase-3 in Apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999, 6, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. Bridgeman, L.; Cimbalo, A.; López-Rodríguez, D.; Pamies, D.; Frangiamone, M. Exploring Toxicological Pathways of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: Insights from Animal and Cellular Models. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 490, 137795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Alqahtani, S.; Alqahtani, S.; Saquib, Q.; Mohiddin, F. Toxicological Impact of Microplastics and Nanoplastics on Humans: Understanding the Mechanistic Aspect of the Interaction. Front. Toxicol. 2023, 5, 1193386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Cui, J.; Zhu, M.; Sun, X.; Yang, J.; Guo, M. Microplastics Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress to Form Inflammation and Cell Death in Hepatocytes of Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquat. Toxicol. 2024, 269, 106870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Wang, Z.; Liu, S.; Cheng, Z.; Xu, G.; Li, F.; Bu, Q.; Zhang, L.; Song, Y.; An, X. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Exacerbates Microplastics-Induced Toxicity in Animal Cells. Food Res. Int. 2024, 175, 113818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  108. Wu, Y.Y.; Zheng, B.R.; Chen, W.Z.; Guo, M.S.; Huang, Y.H.; Zhang, Y. Expression and Role of Autophagy Related Protein p62 and LC3 in the Retina in a Rat Model of Acute Ocular Hypertension. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 13, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Mizushima, N. Autophagic Flux Measurement: Cargo Degradation versus Generation of Degradation Products. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2025, 93, 102463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Pedersen, U.R.; Leidy, C.; Westh, P.; Peters, G.H. The Effect of Calcium on the Properties of Charged Phospholipid Bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2006, 1758, 573–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Wang, J.; Sheng, Q.; Feng, S.; Wang, Z. Regulation of Calcium Ions on the Interaction between Amphotericin B and Cholesterol-Rich Phospholipid Monolayers in LE and LC Phases. Biophys. Chem. 2023, 297, 107012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Zhang, S.; Zhu, N.; Li, H.F.; Gu, J.; Zhang, C.J.; Liao, D.F.; Qin, L. The Lipid Rafts in Cancer Stem Cells: A Target to Eradicate Cancer. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Nguyen, V.H.; Lee, B.J. Protein Corona: A New Approach for Nanomedicine Design. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 3137–3151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. Loomba, R.; Friedman, S.L.; Shulman, G.I. Mechanisms and Disease Consequences of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Cell 2021, 184, 2537–2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  115. Asaoka, Y.; Terai, S.; Sakaida, I.; Nishina, H. The Expanding Role of Fish Models in Understanding Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Dis. Model. Mech. 2013, 6, 905–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  116. Xie, C.; Qi, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Meng, X.; Aikepaer, A.; Lin, Y.; Su, C.; Liu, Y.; Feng, X.; et al. When Short-Chain Fatty Acids Meet Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Revealing Mechanisms, Envisioning Therapies. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2025, 233, 116791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Anne, B.; Raphael, R. Endocrine Disruptor Chemicals. In Endotext; Feingold, K.R., Ahmed, S.F., Anawalt, B., Blackman, M.R., Chrousos, G., Corpas, E., de Herder, W.W., Dhatariya, K., Dungan, K., Hamilton, E., et al., Eds.; MDText.com, Inc.: South Dartmouth, MA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  118. Jin, H.; Yang, C.; Jiang, C.; Li, L.; Pan, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; Ding, J. Evaluation of Neurotoxicity in BALB/C Mice Following Chronic Exposure to Polystyrene Microplastics. Environ. Health Perspect. 2022, 130, 107002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Chantho, V.; Sillapaprayoon, S.; Saenmuangchin, R.; Pongkasem, J.; Theanngern, K.; Dudak Şeker, F.C.; Aueviriyavit, S.; Pimtong, W. Effects of Polystyrene Nanoplastic Size on Zebrafish Embryo Development. Toxicol. Vitr. 2024, 99, 105868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Sun, Z.; Wu, B.; Yi, J.; Yu, H.; He, J.; Teng, F.; Xi, T.; Zhao, J.; Ruan, J.; Xu, P.; et al. Impacts of Environmental Concentrations of Nanoplastics on Zebrafish Neurobehavior and Reproductive Toxicity. Toxics 2024, 12, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Deng, Y.; Yan, Z.; Shen, R.; Huang, Y.; Ren, H.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Reproductive Toxicities Induced by Phthalate-Contaminated Microplastics in Male Mice (Mus musculus). J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Hou, B.; Wang, F.; Liu, T.; Wang, Z. Reproductive Toxicity of Polystyrene Microplastics: In Vivo Experimental Study on Testicular Toxicity in Mice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 405, 124028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Xie, X.; Deng, T.; Duan, J.; Xie, J.; Yuan, J.; Chen, M. Exposure to Polystyrene Microplastics Causes Reproductive Toxicity through Oxidative Stress and Activation of the p38 MAPK Signaling Pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 190, 110133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Amereh, F.; Babaei, M.; Eslami, A.; Fazelipour, S.; Rafiee, M. The Emerging Risk of Exposure to Nano (Micro)plastics on Endocrine Disturbance and Reproductive Toxicity: From a Hypothetical Scenario to a Global Public Health Challenge. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 261, 114158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Yu, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Song, P.; Liu, Z.; Liu, X.; Yan, X.; Dong, Q.; Liu, X. Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Cancer. MedComm 2024, 5, e519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  126. Camilleri, M. Leaky Gut: Mechanisms, Measurement and Clinical Implications in Humans. Gut 2019, 68, 1516–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  127. Shi, C.; Han, X.; Guo, W.; Wu, Q.; Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Tang, G.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. Disturbed gut–liver axis indicating oral exposure to polystyrene microplastic potentially increases the risk of insulin resistance. Environ. Int. 2022, 164, 107273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  128. DeGruttola, A.K.; Low, D.; Mizoguchi, A.; Mizoguchi, E. Current Understanding of Dysbiosis in Disease in Human and Animal Models. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2016, 22, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Li, B.Q.; Ding, Y.F.; Cheng, X. Polyethylene Microplastics Affect the Distribution of Gut Microbiota and Inflammation Development in Mice. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Jin, H.; Yan, M.; Pan, C.; Liu, Z.; Sha, X.; Jiang, C.; Li, L.; Pan, M.; Li, D.; Han, X.; et al. Chronic Exposure to Polystyrene Microplastics Induced Male Reproductive Toxicity and Decreased Testosterone Levels via the LH-Mediated LHR/cAMP/PKA/StAR Pathway. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2022, 19, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  131. Wang, J.; Peng, C.; Li, H.Y. The impact of microplastic–microbe interactions on animal health and biogeochemical cycles: A mini-review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 773, 145697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Xu, G.; Liu, Y.; Song, X. Size effects of microplastics on accumulation and elimination of phenanthrene in earthworms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 403, 123966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  133. Zhang, K.; Hamidian, A.H.; Tubic, A.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.K.H.; Wu, C.; Lam, P.K. Understanding plastic degradation and microplastic formation in the environment: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 274, 116554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Park, E.J.; Han, J.S.; Park, E.J.; Seong, E.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, D.W.; Son, H.Y.; Han, H.Y.; Lee, B.S. Repeated-Oral Dose Toxicity of Polyethylene Microplastics and the Possible Implications on Reproduction and Development of the Next Generation. Toxicol. Lett. 2020, 324, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Smith, C.; Van Haute, M.J.; Rose, D.J. Processing has differential effects on microbiota-accessible carbohydrates in whole grains during in vitro fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e01705-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Lu, L.; Wan, Z.Q.; Luo, T. Polystyrene microplastics induce gut microbiota dysbiosis and hepatic lipid metabolism disorder in mice. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Wang, X.; Deng, K.; Zhang, P.; Chen, Q.; Magnuson, J.T.; Qiu, W.; Zhou, Y. Microplastic-mediated new mechanism of liver damage: From the perspective of the gut–liver axis. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 919, 170962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  138. Chiang, C.C.; Yeh, H.; Shiu, R.F.; Chin, W.C.; Yen, T.H. Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on liver health: Current understanding and future research directions. World J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 30, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Jin, Y.; Xia, J.; Pan, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, W.; Fu, Z. Polystyrene microplastics induce microbiota dysbiosis and inflammation in the gut of adult zebrafish. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 235, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  140. Chen, Q.; Gundlach, M.; Yang, S.; Jiang, J.; Velki, M.; Yin, D.; Hollert, H. Quantitative Investigation of the Mechanisms of Microplastics and Nanoplastics toward Zebrafish Larvae Locomotor Activity. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 584–585, 1022–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  141. Wang, Y.L.; Zheng, C.M.; Lee, Y.H.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Lin, Y.F.; Chiu, H.W. Micro- and nanosized substances cause different autophagy-related responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. Prata, J.C.; da Costa, J.P.; Lopes, I.; Duarte, A.C.; Rocha-Santos, T. Environmental exposure to microplastics: An overview on possible human health effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 702, 134455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Sun, J.; Xia, S.; Ning, Y.; Pan, X.; Qu, J.; Xu, Y. Effects of microplastics and attached heavy metals on growth, immunity, and heavy metal accumulation in the yellow seahorse (Hippocampus kuda Bleeker). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 149, 110510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  144. Sun, W.; Yan, S.; Meng, Z.; Tian, S.; Jia, M.; Huang, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Diao, J.; Zhu, W. Combined Ingestion of Polystyrene Microplastics and Epoxiconazole Increases Health Risk to Mice: Based on Their Synergistic Bioaccumulation In Vivo. Environ. Int. 2022, 166, 107391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Rist, S.; Hartmann, N.B.; Welden, N.A.C. How fast, how far: Diversification and adoption of novel methods in aquatic microplastic monitoring. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  146. Bai, J.; Wang, Y.; Deng, S.; Yang, Y.; Chen, S.; Wu, Z. Microplastics caused embryonic growth retardation and placental dysfunction in pregnant mice by activating GRP78/IRE1α/JNK axis-induced apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2024, 21, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  147. Nilsson, E.E.; Skinner, M.K. Environmentally induced epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of disease susceptibility. Transl. Res. 2015, 165, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Ullah, S.; Ahmad, S.; Guo, X.; Ullah, S.; Ullah, S.; Nabi, G.; Wanghe, K. A review of the endocrine disrupting effects of micro and nano plastic and their associated chemicals in mammals. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 13, 1084236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Pathak, D. Enemies of the hormones: Microplastics and endocrine disruptors impacting public health. In Health and Climate Change; Pachauri, S., Pachauri, A., Jonathan, M.P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2025; pp. 119–150. [Google Scholar]
  150. Xu, Q.; Huang, Q.S.; Luo, T.-Y.; Wu, R.-L.; Wei, W.; Ni, B.-J. Coagulation removal and photocatalytic degradation of microplastics in urban waters. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 416, 129123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Liu, P.; Zhan, X.; Wu, X.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Gao, S. Effect of weathering on environmental behavior of microplastics: Properties, sorption and potential risks. Chemosphere 2020, 242, 125193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  152. Zhang, H.-Y.; Duan, J.; Wang, J.; Xie, M.-J.; Liu, Q.; Liu, J.-Q.; Yang, H.-X.; Wang, M.-Q. Masseter response to long-term experimentally induced anterior crossbite in Sprague–Dawley rats. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021, 122, 104985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  153. Cheng, H.; Feng, Y.; Duan, Z.; Duan, X.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Gong, Z.; Wang, L. Toxicities of microplastic fibers and granules on the development of zebrafish embryos and their combined effects with cadmium. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 128677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  154. Barboza, L.G.A.; Vieira, L.R.; Branco, V.; Figueiredo, N.; Carvalho, F.; Carvalho, C.; Guilhermino, L. Microplastics cause neurotoxicity, oxidative damage and energy-related changes and interact with the bioaccumulation of mercury in the European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 195, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  155. Guo, Y.; Li, Z.; Xu, P.; Guo, G.; He, T.; Lai, Y. Subchronic and chronic toxicity assessment of sublancin in Sprague–Dawley rats. Toxics 2025, 13, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  156. Wang, J.; Erlacher, M.; Fernandez-Orth, J. The role of inflammation in hematopoiesis and bone marrow failure: What can we learn from mouse models? Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 951937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. DiBona, E.; Haley, C.; Geist, S.; Seemann, F. Developmental polyethylene microplastic fiber exposure entails subtle reproductive impacts in juvenile Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2022, 41, 2848–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  158. Zhao, H.; Wang, Q.; Hu, L.; Xing, S.; Gong, H.; Liu, Z.; Qin, P.; Xu, J.; Du, J.; Ai, W.; et al. Dynamic alteration of the gut microbiota associated with obesity and intestinal inflammation in ovariectomy C57BL/6 mice. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2022, 2022, 6600158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  159. Li, P.; Chang, M. Roles of PRR-mediated signaling pathways in the regulation of oxidative stress and inflammatory diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  160. Ding, J.; Huang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, S.; Zou, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, W.; Geng, J. Toxicological effects of nano- and micro-polystyrene plastics on red tilapia: Are larger plastic particles more harmless? J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 396, 122693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  161. Kim, D.Y.; Park, M.K.; Yang, H.W.; Woo, S.Y.; Jung, H.H.; Son, D.S.; Choi, B.Y.; Suh, S.W. Effects of microplastic accumulation on neuronal death after global cerebral ischemia. Cells 2025, 14, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  162. Li, Z.; Zhu, S.; Liu, Q.; Wei, J.; Jin, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Polystyrene microplastics cause cardiac fibrosis by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promoting cardiomyocyte apoptosis in rats. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 115025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  163. Pitt, J.A.; Kozal, J.S.; Jayasundara, N.; Massarsky, A.; Trevisan, R.; Geitner, N. Uptake, tissue distribution, and toxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 194, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  164. Prüst, M.; Meijer, J.; Westerink, R.H.S. The plastic brain: Neurotoxicity of micro- and nanoplastics. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2020, 17, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  165. Barboza, L.G.A.; Vethaak, A.D.; Lavorante, B.R.B.O.; Lundebye, A.-K.; Guilhermino, L. Marine microplastic debris: An emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 133, 336–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  166. Sarasamma, S.; Audira, G.; Siregar, P.; Malhotra, N.; Lai, Y.H.; Liang, S.T.; Chen, J.R.; Chen, K.H.C.; Hsiao, C.D. Nanoplastics cause neurobehavioral impairments, reproductive and oxidative damages, and biomarker responses in zebrafish: Throwing up alarms of widespread health risk of exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  167. Wang, C.; Hou, M.; Shang, K.; Wang, H.; Wang, J. Microplastics (polystyrene) exposure induces metabolic changes in the liver of rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus). Molecules 2022, 27, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  168. Hou, Z.; Meng, R.; Chen, G.; Lai, T.; Qing, R.; Hao, S.; Deng, J.; Wang, B. Distinct accumulation of nanoplastics in human intestinal organoids. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 155811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  169. Zhu, L.; Xie, C.; Chen, L.; Dai, X.; Zhou, Y.; Pan, H.; Tian, K. Transport of microplastics in the body and interaction with biological barriers, and controlling of microplastics pollution. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 255, 114818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  170. Hogaboam, C.M.; Blease, K.; Mehrad, B.; Steinhauser, M.L.; Standiford, T.J.; Kunkel, S.L.; Lukacs, N.W. Chronic airway hyperreactivity, goblet cell hyperplasia, and peribronchial fibrosis during allergic airway disease induced by Aspergillus fumigatus. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 156, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  171. Wang, N.S.; Ying, W.L. The pattern of goblet cell hyperplasia in human airways. Hum. Pathol. 1977, 8, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  172. Feng, L.; Chen, C.; Xiong, X.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Kuang, Q.; Wei, X.; Gao, L.; Niu, X.; Li, Q.; et al. PS-MPs promotes the progression of inflammation and fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy through NLRP3/Caspase-1 and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling pathways. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 273, 116102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  173. Durham, A.L.; Adcock, I.M. The relationship between COPD and lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2015, 90, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  174. Gerull, B.; Brodehl, A. Genetic animal models for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  175. Ray, A.; Maharana, K.C.; Meenakshi, S.; Singh, S. Endothelial dysfunction and its relation in different disorders: Recent update. Health Sci. Rev. 2023, 7, 100084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  176. Du, W.; Xu, K.; Wang, S.; Gao, X.; Jiang, M.; Lv, X.; Zhou, Q.; Ma, P.; Yang, X.; Wang, S.; et al. Exposure to polystyrene microplastics with different functional groups: Implications for blood pressure and heart. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 372, 126009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  177. Wang, S.; Yan, K.; Dong, Y.; Chen, Y.; Song, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, X.; Qi, R.; Zhou, X.; Zhong, J.; et al. The influence of microplastics on hypertension-associated cardiovascular injury via the modulation of gut microbiota. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 368, 125760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  178. Scoote, M.; Williams, A.J. Myocardial calcium signalling and arrhythmia pathogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 322, 1286–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  179. Xie, L.; Zhao, Y.; Pan, Y.; Shang, Y.; Kong, Y.; Gu, Y.; Chen, T.; Mao, W. The impact of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics on the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: Focusing on network toxicology and target gene detection. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 302, 118692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  180. Marfella, R.; Prattichizzo, F.; Sardu, C.; Fulgenzi, G.; Graciotti, L.; Spadoni, T.; D’Onofrio, N.; Paolisso, G. Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 390, 900–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  181. Xuran, L.; Zhang, T.; Lv, W.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Xu, Q.; Cai, H.; Dai, J. Intratracheal administration of polystyrene microplastics induces pulmonary fibrosis by activating oxidative stress and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 232, 113238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  182. Dong, Y.; Gao, M.; Song, Z.; Qiu, W. As(III) adsorption onto different-sized polystyrene microplastic particles and its mechanism. Chemosphere 2020, 239, 124792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  183. Zhou, Y.; Wu, Q.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, W. Low-dose polystyrene microplastics induce cardiotoxicity in mice and human-originated cardiac organoids. Environ. Int. 2023, 179, 108171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  184. Yan, Y.; Yu, Y.; Sima, J.; Geng, C.; Yang, J. Aging behavior of microplastics accelerated by mechanical fragmentation: Alteration of intrinsic and extrinsic properties. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 90993–91006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  185. Walczak, A.P.; Kramer, E.; Hendriksen, P.J.; Helsdingen, R.; van der Zande, M.; Rietjens, I.M.; Bouwmeester, H. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion increases the translocation of polystyrene nanoparticles in an in vitro intestinal co-culture model. Nanotoxicology 2015, 9, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  186. Lee, S.E.; Kim, D.Y.; Jeong, T.S.; Park, Y.S. Micro- and nano-plastic-induced adverse health effects on lungs and kidneys linked to oxidative stress and inflammation. Life 2025, 15, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  187. Prietl, B.; Meindl, C.; Roblegg, E.; Pieber, T.R.; Lanzer, G.; Fröhlich, E. Nano-sized and micro-sized polystyrene particles affect phagocyte function. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2014, 30, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  188. Yu, C.W.; Luk, T.C.; Liao, V.H. Long-term nanoplastics exposure results in multi- and trans-generational reproduction decline associated with germline toxicity and epigenetic regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  189. Zhang, X.; He, X.; Pan, D.; Shi, L.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Pu, L.; et al. Effects of thermal exposure to disposable plastic tableware on human gut microbiota and metabolites: A quasi-experimental study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 460, 132800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  190. Wu, D.; Feng, Y.; Wang, R.; Jiang, J.; Guan, Q.; Yang, X.; Wei, H.; Xia, Y.; Luo, Y. Pigment microparticles and microplastics found in human thrombi based on Raman spectral evidence. J. Adv. Res. 2023, 49, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  191. Ragusa, A.; Notarstefano, V.; Svelato, A.; Belloni, A.; Gioacchini, G.; Blondeel, C.; Zucchelli, E.; De Luca, C.; D’Avino, S.; Gulotta, A.; et al. Raman microspectroscopy detection and characterisation of microplastics in human breastmilk. Polymers 2022, 14, 2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  192. Deng, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, W.; Chen, D. Polystyrene microplastics affect the reproductive performance of male mice and lipid homeostasis in their offspring. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2022, 9, 752–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  193. Chen, X.; Hossain, M.F.; Duan, C.; Lu, J.; Tsang, Y.F.; Islam, M.S.; Zhou, Y. Isotherm models for adsorption of heavy metals from water—A review. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  194. Dan, K.B.; Yoo, J.Y.; Min, H. The emerging threat of micro- and nanoplastics on the maturation and activity of immune cells. Biomol. Ther. 2025, 33, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  195. Alijagic, A.; Hedbrant, A.; Persson, A.; Larsson, M.; Engwall, M.; Särndahl, E. NLRP3 inflammasome as a sensor of micro- and nanoplastics immunotoxicity. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1178434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  196. Cao, J.; Xu, R.; Wang, F.; Geng, Y.; Xu, T.; Zhu, M.; Lv, H.; Xu, S.; Guo, M.-Y. Polyethylene microplastics trigger cell apoptosis and inflammation via inducing oxidative stress and activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in carp gills. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022, 131, 108470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  197. Jing, J.; Zhang, L.; Han, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Z.; Gao, A. Polystyrene micro-/nanoplastics induced hematopoietic damages via crosstalk of gut microbiota, metabolites, and cytokines. Environ. Int. 2022, 161, 107131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  198. Pelepenko, L.E.; de Oliveira, M.C.; Masaro, D.A.; Lustosa, G.M.M.M.; Mazon, T.; Castilho, R.F.; dos Reis, L.M.; Mac-Way, F.; Hénaut, L.; Kamel, S.; et al. Effects of microplastics on the bones: A comprehensive review. Osteoporos. Int. 2025, 36, 1327–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  199. Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Jiang, G. Microplastics exposure promotes proliferation of skin cancer cells but inhibits normal skin cell growth by regulating inflammation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 267, 115636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  200. Xue, J.-D.; Gao, J.; Tang, A.-F.; Feng, C. Shaping the immune landscape: Multidimensional environmental stimuli refine macrophage polarization and foster revolutionary approaches in tissue regeneration. Heliyon 2024, 10, e37192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  201. Prata, J.C. Airborne microplastics: Consequences to human health? Environ. Pollut. 2018, 234, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  202. Zhang, T.; Jiang, B.; Xing, Y.; Ya, H.; Lv, M.; Wang, X. Current status of microplastics pollution in the aquatic environment, interaction with other pollutants, and effects on aquatic organisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 16830–16859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  203. Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Sun, K.; Wang, S.; Gong, D. Polystyrene microplastics induce apoptosis and necroptosis in swine testis cells via ROS/MAPK/HIF1α pathway. Environ. Toxicol. 2022, 37, 2483–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  204. Lim, D.; Jeong, J.; Song, K.S.; Sung, J.H.; Oh, S.M.; Choi, J. Inhalation toxicity of polystyrene micro(nano)plastics using modified OECD TG 412. Chemosphere 2021, 262, 128330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  205. Galloway, T.S.; Cole, M.; Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017, 1, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  206. Rist, S.; Baun, A.; Hartmann, N.B. Ingestion of micro- and nanoplastics in Daphnia magna: Quantification of body burdens and assessment of feeding rates and reproduction. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 228, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  207. Brennecke, D.; Duarte, B.; Paiva, F.; Caçador, I.; Canning-Clode, J. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 178, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  208. Hildebrandt, L.; Nack, F.L.; Zimmermann, T.; Profrock, D. Microplastics as a Trojan horse for trace metals. J. Hazard. Mater. Lett. 2021, 2, 100035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Different exposure routes of microplastics exposure.
Figure 1. Different exposure routes of microplastics exposure.
Sustainability 18 03527 g001
Figure 2. Figure depicting different routes of exposure along with their percentage and key sources, as ingestion has 55%, inhalation routes have 25% exposure, dermal have 10%, transgenerational have 5% and indirect or combined have 5% microplastics exposure.
Figure 2. Figure depicting different routes of exposure along with their percentage and key sources, as ingestion has 55%, inhalation routes have 25% exposure, dermal have 10%, transgenerational have 5% and indirect or combined have 5% microplastics exposure.
Sustainability 18 03527 g002
Figure 3. Different mechanisms of toxicity of microplastics.
Figure 3. Different mechanisms of toxicity of microplastics.
Sustainability 18 03527 g003
Figure 4. Different studies illustrate microplastics-induced toxicity in the liver. The X axis represents the study numbers, while the Y axis indicates the various toxicological endpoints evaluated across studies, including oxidative stress/ROS, steatosis/lipid dysregulation, fibrosis/stellate cell activation, inflammation/immune response, mitochondrial dysfunction and disruption of xenobiotic metabolism.
Figure 4. Different studies illustrate microplastics-induced toxicity in the liver. The X axis represents the study numbers, while the Y axis indicates the various toxicological endpoints evaluated across studies, including oxidative stress/ROS, steatosis/lipid dysregulation, fibrosis/stellate cell activation, inflammation/immune response, mitochondrial dysfunction and disruption of xenobiotic metabolism.
Sustainability 18 03527 g004
Table 1. The table shows the gastrointestinal toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Table 1. The table shows the gastrointestinal toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
S. No.Model SystemMP Type and SizeExposure Route and DurationKey FindingsReference
1.C57BL/6 micePS nano plastics (50–100 nm)Oral gavage, 4 weeksIntestinal barrier disruption (occludin/claudin), increased gut permeability; local inflammation (IL-6, TNF-α)[129]
2.Zebrafish larvaePS MPs (1–2 µm)Waterborne, 7 daysEnterocyte damage, altered gut morphology, increased pro-inflammatory gene expression[130]
3.Human Caco-2 intestinal epithelium cellsPS nano plastics (80–100 nm)In Vitro, 24–48 hImpaired trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER); increased translocation of particles; cytokine release[131]
4.Rat colonic epithelial cells (In Vitro)PS nanoplastics (100 nm)In Vitro, 24 hIncreased ROS, apoptotic markers (Caspase-3); decreased tight junction protein expression[132]
5.Sprague-Dawley ratsPE MPs (20–50 µm)Oral, 6–12 weeksMucosal inflammation, increased MDA, reduced SOD/GSH; altered gut microbiota composition[77]
7.BALB/c micePS MPs (100 nm)Oral, 3 weeksImpaired intestinal development in juveniles; reduced goblet cell numbers; heightened intestinal cytokines[133]
8.Human intestinal organoidsPS nano plastics (50–100 nm)Direct exposure, 48–72 hDisrupted epithelial differentiation; increased epithelial cell death; barrier dysfunction[134]
9.Human fecal microbiome (ex vivo incubations)Mixed MPs (0.1–10 µm)Ex Vivo, 24–72 hMicrobiome shifts (Proteobacteria, Firmicutes); altered SCFA production[135]
10.ICR micePS MPs (1 µm)Oral, 8 weeksVillus atrophy, shortened villi, reduced nutrient absorption; gut dysbiosis[136]
Table 2. The table shows the renal/nephrotoxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Table 2. The table shows the renal/nephrotoxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Study No.Model SystemMP Type & SizeExposure Route & DurationKey Renal FindingsReference
1.C57BL/6 micePS nanoplastics (50–100 nm)Oral gavage, 4 weeks↑ Serum creatinine/BUN; proximal tubular vacuolization; oxidative stress (SOD, T1MD)[129]
2.Sprague-Dawley ratsPS MPs (1 μm)Oral, 8 weeksTubulointerstitial inflammation; apoptosis (Caspase-3); mitochondrial swelling[133]
3.Zebrafish (adult)PS beads (2 μm)Waterborne, 14 daysPronephric/mesonephric tubular damage; impaired ion regulation; ROS elevation[140]
4.HK-2 human proximal tubule cellsPS nano (80–100 nm)In Vitro, 24–48 hMitochondrial depolarization; DNA damage (γ-H2AX); autophagy flux disturbance[141]
5.C57BL/6 micePS MPs (500 nm)Oral, 6 weeksFibrosis (TGF-β1/Smad3); collagen deposition; decreased Klotho expression[81]
6.Human glomerular endothelial cellsPS nano (100 nm)In Vitro, 24 hEndothelial barrier dysfunction; ICAM-1/VCAM-1; increased permeability[142]
7.Zebrafish larvaePS MPs (1 μm)Waterborne, 7 daysImpaired renal clearance; developmental renal malformations; pro-inflammatory cytokines[143]
8.ICR micePS beads (5 μm)Oral, 4 weeksTransporter dysregulation (OAT1/3, OCT2); impaired xenobiotic excretion[144]
9.Wistar ratsMixed MPs (PS/PE, 0.1–10 μm)Oral, 12 weeksSynergistic nephrotoxicity with Cd co-exposure; exacerbated inflammation and fibrosis[145]
Table 3. The table shows the reproductive toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Table 3. The table shows the reproductive toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Study No.Model SystemMP Type & SizeExposure Route & DurationKey Reproductive FindingsReference
1.C57BL/6 male micePS nanoplastics (50–100 nm)Oral gavage, 4–6 weeksReduced sperm count & motility; increased sperm DNA fragmentation; testicular oxidative stress[151]
2.Wistar rats (male)PS MPs (1 μm)Oral, 8 weeksDecreased testosterone; Leydig-cell dysfunction; altered steroidogenic genes (StAR, CYP11A1)[152]
3.BALB/c female micePS MPs (5 μm)Oral, 6 weeksReduced ovarian follicle reserve; increased atresia; elevated ovarian ROS & apoptosis[153]
4.Zebrafish (adult)PS beads (2 μm)Waterborne, 21 daysDecreased fecundity; impaired oocyte maturation; altered vitellogenin and ESR1 expression[154]
5.Sprague-Dawley rats (male)PE MPs (20–50 μm)Oral, 10 weeksSeminiferous tubule degeneration; reduced epididymal sperm quality; increased testicular MDA[155]
6.Human granulosa-like cells (KGN)PS nanoplastics (100 nm)In Vitro, 24–48 hMitochondrial dysfunction; decreased progesterone/estradiol synthesis; apoptosis signaling activation[144]
7.Mouse oocytes (IVM)PS nanoplastics (80 nm)In Vitro, ≤24 hMeiotic spindle abnormalities; impaired mitochondrial membrane potential; decreased maturation rate[156]
8.Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes)PE microfibers (~20 μm)Waterborne, 28 daysTestis histopathology; reduced GSI; lowered fertilization success[157]
9.C57BL/6 mice (gestation)PS MPs (1 μm)Maternal oral exposure GD0–GD18Placental accumulation; fetal growth restriction; altered placental cytokines[142]
10.Human trophoblast cells (BeWo)PS nanoplastics (50–100 nm)In Vitro, 24–48 hBarrier dysfunction; increased IL-6/IL-8; reduced hCG secretion[158]
11.Male mice (F0–F1)PS MPs (500 nm–1 μm)Multigenerational oral, 10 weeks + breedingTransgenerational sperm defects (F1); altered testis epigenetic marks[159]
12.Nile tilapiaPS beads (5 μm)Waterborne, 30 daysGonadal inflammation; decreased sex steroid levels; reduced spawning[160]
Table 4. The table shows the central nervous system toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Table 4. The table shows the central nervous system toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Study No.Model SystemMP Type & SizeExposure Route & DurationKey CNS FindingsReference
1.C57BL/6 micePS nanoplastics (50–100 nm)Oral gavage, 4 weeksDetected in brain tissue; microglial activation; elevated IL-6, IL-1β; oxidative stress markers (NOX4, HO-1)[64]
2.BALB/c micePS nanoplastics (50 nm)Intranasal instillation, 7 daysCrossing of BBB; neuronal apoptosis; impaired spatial memory[63]
3.Zebrafish larvaePS MPs (1 μm)Waterborne, 7 daysAltered locomotor activity; neurotransmitter imbalance; neuroinflammation[163]
4.Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cellsPS nanoplastics (100 nm)In Vitro exposure, 24 hReduced BDNF expression; disrupted calcium signaling; synaptic dysfunction[164]
5.Wistar ratsPE MPs (20 μm)Oral, 6 weeksOxidative damage to dopaminergic neurons; behavioral anxiety-like changes[102]
6.C57BL/6 micePS MPs (500 nm)Oral, 8 weeksEpigenetic modifications in brain tissue; altered microRNA expression[80]
7.ZebrafishPS nanoplastics (70 nm)Waterborne, 10 daysBBB penetration; acetylcholinesterase inhibition; abnormal swimming behavior[165]
8.Rat cortical neurons (primary culture)PS nanoplastics (50 nm)In Vitro, 48 hIncreased ROS; mitochondrial depolarization; caspase-3 activation[166]
9.Sprague-Dawley ratsPS MPs (1 μm)Oral gavage, 12 weeksCognitive deficits in novel object recognition test; hippocampal inflammation[167]
10.Human cerebral organoidsPS nanoplastics (100 nm)Direct exposure, 72 hImpaired neuronal differentiation; altered synaptic protein expression[168]
Table 5. The table shows the cardio-pulmonary toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Table 5. The table shows the cardio-pulmonary toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Study No.Model System MP Type and SizeExposure Route and DurationKey Immunological FindingsReferences
1.Humans (carotid plaques, cohort)PE, PVC MNPsObservation, 34 mo follow-upMPs in 60% of plaques; ↑ risk of MI/stroke[180]
2.Mice (intratracheal)PS MPsDose–responsePulmonary fibrosis, oxidative stress[181]
3.Human lung epithelial cellsPS NPsIn VitroInflammatory cytokine release[182]
4.Zebrafish embryosPS NPsAquaticBradycardia, circulation defects[163]
5.Human cardiac organoids + micePS MPsOral + In VitroCardiac hypertrophy, oxidative stress[183]
6.Human thrombi (stroke/MI)Mixed MPs (~35 µm)Thrombus samplesMPs detected in 80% cases[184]
7.Caco-2 endothelial barrierPS NPsIn VitroTranslocation across barrier[185]
8.Rats (oral gavage)PS NPs28 dCardiac hypertrophy, apoptosis[118]
9.hiPSC-cardiomyocytesPS NPs (0.05–1 µm)Long-term exposureReduced contractility, Ca2+ dysregulation[186]
10.Zebrafish adultPS MPsLong-termCardiac oxidative stress, arrhythmias[154]
11.Rats (90d oral)PS MPs (0.5 µm)Drinking waterApoptosis, fibrosis, Wnt/β-catenin activation[80]
12.Mice (coronary artery)PS NPsInjectionEndothelial dysfunction[55]
13.H9C2 cardio myoblastsPS MPsIn VitroROS ↑, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction[127]
14.HUVECs (endothelial cells)PS NPs (~50 nm)In VitroBarrier disruption, permeability ↑[187]
15.Chicken embryosPS NPsInjectionCardiac malformations[188]
17.Mice (42d oral) + H9C2 cellsPS NPsOral & cultureVentricular remodeling, oxidative stress[189]
18.Mice (maternal exposure)PS NPsGestationalOffspring cardiac dysfunction[190]
19.Human plasma proteomicsMPs detectedCross-sectionalCorrelation with cardiovascular risk[191]
20.In Vitro & In Vivo thrombosisPS NPsBlood modelsPlatelet hyperactivation, ↑ thrombus [156]
21.Mice (combined PM2.5 + MPs)PS NPs + PM2.5InhalationExacerbated lung fibrosis[15]
22.Mice (long-term inhalation)PS NPsChronic exposureFerroptosis, fibrosis Via cGAS-STING[107]
23.Rats (180d oral)PS MPsLong-term ingestionMyocardial fibrosis, inflammation[192]
24.Mice (airway instillation)PS MPsIntratrachealPulmonary inflammation, fibrosis[168]
25.Zebrafish larvaePS MPsAquatic exposurePericardial edema, reduced HR[193]
Table 6. The table shows the Immunological toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Table 6. The table shows the Immunological toxicity induced by microplastics in different model organisms.
Study No.Model System MP Type and SizeExposure Route and DurationKey Immunological FindingsReference
1.Human THP-1 macrophages (In Vitro)Polystyrene (100 nm)Direct exposure, 24 hIncreased IL-1β, TNF-α secretion; activation of NLRP3 inflammasome[10]
2.Human PBMCsPS nanoplastics (50 nm)Direct exposure, 24 hIncreased ROS; reduced IL-10 production[201]
3.Wistar rats
PS MPs (1 µm)Oral, 8 weeksIncreased serum IgG & IgA; splenic inflammation[202]
4.BALB/c micePS MPs (500 nm)Intratracheal instillation, 14 daysLung macrophage activation; TLR4 upregulation[203]
5.Human bronchial epithelial cellsPS fibers (~10 µm)Airborne exposure, 48 hIL-8 release; NF-κB activation[204]
6.Marine mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis)PS beads (2 µm)Waterborne, 96 hHemocyte lysosomal destabilization; reduced phagocytosis[205]
7.C57BL/6 micePS beads (5 µm)Oral gavage, 4 weeksGut dysbiosis; increased IL-6, IFN-γ; reduced Treg population[136]
8.Daphnia magnaPE MPs (10 µm)Waterborne, 72 hAltered immune gene expression; reduced survival under infection[206]
9.Zebrafish larvaePS MPs (1 µm)Waterborne, 7 daysElevated pro-inflammatory cytokines; neutrophil infiltration[207]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rathee, V.; Ahlawat, Y.K.; Singh, R.; Bhardwaj, J.K.; Kaur, A.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, P.; Choudhary, R.; Didwania, N.; Kumar, D.; et al. Microplastics and Health: A Review on Environmental Exposure, Toxicokinetics and Biological Effects. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073527

AMA Style

Rathee V, Ahlawat YK, Singh R, Bhardwaj JK, Kaur A, Kumar S, Sharma P, Choudhary R, Didwania N, Kumar D, et al. Microplastics and Health: A Review on Environmental Exposure, Toxicokinetics and Biological Effects. Sustainability. 2026; 18(7):3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073527

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rathee, Vishavjeet, Yogesh K. Ahlawat, Ritu Singh, Jitender Kumar Bhardwaj, Ajaybeer Kaur, Suresh Kumar, Priya Sharma, Rita Choudhary, Nidhi Didwania, Dharmendra Kumar, and et al. 2026. "Microplastics and Health: A Review on Environmental Exposure, Toxicokinetics and Biological Effects" Sustainability 18, no. 7: 3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073527

APA Style

Rathee, V., Ahlawat, Y. K., Singh, R., Bhardwaj, J. K., Kaur, A., Kumar, S., Sharma, P., Choudhary, R., Didwania, N., Kumar, D., & Agarwal, S. (2026). Microplastics and Health: A Review on Environmental Exposure, Toxicokinetics and Biological Effects. Sustainability, 18(7), 3527. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18073527

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop