Next Article in Journal
Stochastic Characteristics of Manual Solar Shades and their Influence on Building Energy Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Reducing Global Warming Potential through Sustainable Intensification of Basmati Rice-Wheat Systems in India
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Hansen, A., et al. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028

1
Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (ATB), Max–Eyth–Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany
2
Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt–Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 1074; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061074
Submission received: 30 May 2017 / Revised: 30 May 2017 / Accepted: 16 June 2017 / Published: 21 June 2017
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
(1)
In the manuscript, the following text above Figure 2 should be replaced:
“[…] CUDe of 63.4% (CUDe = 2% + 32.4% + 29.0%; Boundary II in Figure 2).”
with
“[…] CUDe of 63.3% (CUDe = 2% + 32.4% + 28.9%; Boundary II in Figure 1).”
(2)
Figure 1 and Figure 2 should be replaced:
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g001
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g002
with
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Figure 1. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further use of this biogas in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g003
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Figure 2. Carbon flows as a percentage of carbon fixed in harvestable biomass Cin, including stubble, and the resulting productive (grey arrows) and unproductive C (hatched arrows) during biogas generation from maize (Boundary I) and further upgrading to bio-methane by conversion in a combined heat and power (CHP) unit, as well as separation of CO2 for further industrial use (Boundary II).
Sustainability 09 01074 g004
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by these changes. The change does not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original will remain online on the article webpage.

Reference

  1. Hansen, A.; Budde, J.; Karatay, Y.N.; Prochnow, A. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hansen, A.; Budde, J.; Karatay, Y.N.; Prochnow, A. Correction: Hansen, A., et al. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061074

AMA Style

Hansen A, Budde J, Karatay YN, Prochnow A. Correction: Hansen, A., et al. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028. Sustainability. 2017; 9(6):1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hansen, Anja, Jörn Budde, Yusuf Nadi Karatay, and Annette Prochnow. 2017. "Correction: Hansen, A., et al. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028" Sustainability 9, no. 6: 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061074

APA Style

Hansen, A., Budde, J., Karatay, Y. N., & Prochnow, A. (2017). Correction: Hansen, A., et al. CUDe—Carbon Utilization Degree as an Indicator for Sustainable Biomass Use. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1028. Sustainability, 9(6), 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop