Next Article in Journal
Rosetta CONSERT Data as a Testbed for In Situ Navigation of Space Probes and Radiosciences in Orbit/Escort Phases for Small Bodies of the Solar System
Next Article in Special Issue
Coupling Complementary Strategy to U-Net Based Convolution Neural Network for Detecting Lunar Impact Craters
Previous Article in Journal
Identifying Dynamic Changes in Water Surface Using Sentinel-1 Data Based on Genetic Algorithm and Machine Learning Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
License Plate Image Reconstruction Based on Generative Adversarial Networks
 
 
Technical Note
Peer-Review Record

Adaptive Network Detector for Radar Target in Changing Scenes

Remote Sens. 2021, 13(18), 3743; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183743
by He Jing, Yongqiang Cheng *, Hao Wu and Hongqiang Wang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(18), 3743; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183743
Submission received: 12 July 2021 / Revised: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 16 September 2021 / Published: 18 September 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

the technical note entitled: Adaptive Network Detector for Radar Target in Changing Scenes proposes an adaptive network detector combined with scene classification. It is very important because the performance of the detection network is severely degraded when the detection scene changes, since the trained network with the data from one scene is not suitable for another scene with different data distribution.

All chapters (abstract, introduction, methods, experimental setup, results and discussion, as well as conclusion) are well described and they do not raise any doubts. In terms of the literature review is very complex (42 positions), all of which are papers from recognized scientific journals, such as: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Remote Sensing, and others. Moreover, I would like to point out that the papers cited are related to the subject of this article (radar target detection, neural networks, scene classification, constant false alarm rate and time-frequency graph). However, in the publication make the following changes:

  • Please make Figure 1 again because it is incomprehensible.
  • The article is not at the highest editorial level. It would be necessary to improve, e.g. errors and typos.
  • Please write sentences impersonally.

To sum up, after taking into account the above amendments (minor revision), I suppose that this article is suitable for publication in the Remote Sensing.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

small changes to the Figures

Fig. 7 CHANGE THE COLOUR OF THE INSIDE TEXT

Fig. 6 There is no label maybe near the graphs for a, b, c, d, e, f

Fig. 5 The same problem

also to Fig. 3 & 4

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop