Next Article in Journal
Unsupervised Building Instance Segmentation of Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds for Parallel Reconstruction Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
How Accurate Is an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data-Based Model Applied on Satellite Imagery for Chlorophyll-a Estimation in Freshwater Bodies?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Remote Sensing
Volume 13
Issue 6
10.3390/rs13061135
remotesensing-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Effects of Land Cover Land Use Change on Precipitation Dynamics in Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area from 2001 to 2019

by
Xinghan Wang
1,†,
Peitong Cong
2,†,
Yuhao Jin
2,†,
Xichun Jia
2,
Junshu Wang
3 and
Yuxing Han
3,*
1
Water Resources Remote Sensing Department, Pearl River Water Resources Research Institute, Guangzhou 510610, China
2
College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
3
College of Electronic Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(6), 1135; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061135
Submission received: 24 January 2021 / Revised: 7 March 2021 / Accepted: 11 March 2021 / Published: 17 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Biogeosciences Remote Sensing)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The change of spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation has an important impact on urban water security. The effect of land cover land use change (LCLUC) on the spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation needs to be further studied. In this study, transfer matrix, standard deviation ellipse and spatial autocorrelation analysis techniques were used. Based on the data of land cover land use and precipitation, this paper analyzed the land cover land use change and its influence on the spatial and temporal distribution pattern of precipitation in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). The results showed that from 2001 to 2019, the area of cropland, water, barren, forest/grassland in the GBA decreased by 44.03%, 8.05%, 50.22%, 0.43%, respectively, and the area of construction land increased by 20.05%. The precipitation in the GBA was mainly concentrated in spring and summer, and the precipitation in spring tended to increase gradually, while the precipitation in summer tended to decrease gradually, while the precipitation in autumn and winter has no obvious change. It was found that with the change of land cover land use, the spatial distribution of precipitation also changed. Especially in the areas where the change of construction land was concentrated, the spatial distribution of precipitation changed most obviously.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The change of the spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation has an important impact on urban water security, and it is of great significance to discuss the change trend of precipitation center in the future to guarantee urban water security [1]. It has been showed that the temporal and spatial variation of precipitation was affected by many factors, among which land cover land use change (LCLUC) was an important influencing factor [2,3]. The impact of LCLUC on climate, especially precipitation, cannot be ignored. At present, many studies have been done on the impact of LCLUC [2,4], including temperature, circulation, carbon emissions, runoff–sediment [5], and other aspects [6,7,8]. However, there have also been studies on the negative environmental effects of anthropogenic LCLUC to improve crop production [9]. Some scholars have studied the effects of climate and LCLUC on water security in watersheds [1], while few studies specifically focus on the impact of LCLUC on precipitation.
LCLUC could affect the exchange of water, energy, greenhouse gases, non-greenhouse gases and aerosols between the land system and the atmosphere [10,11,12]. Albedo changes and greenhouse gas caused by these impacts will drive global climate change, while on a regional scale, the redistribution of energy and water vapor between land and atmosphere will contribute to regional climate change and affect precipitation distribution. At the same time, the ultrafine aerosol generated in the region will develop into cloud condensation nuclei, and can lead to the regional scale change of precipitation, so any change in aerosol source strength caused by man-made and climate change will generate feedback to the water budget [13]. Previous studies have suggested that the impact of LCLUC on the global average climate was not obvious, but that climate change on the regional scale was significant and varies with different types of land cover land use conversion [14,15]. Bounoua et al. indicated that judging from the average global temperature and precipitation caused by LCLUC, they can offset each other. Yan et al. found that worldwide, LCLUC via the biological effect of geophysics can offset the warming caused by greenhouse gases increase. At the same time, two studies that caused LCLUC on a regional scale climate change were significant [14,16].
Most of the studies focused on the impact of urbanization on urban precipitation and the impact of forest or farmland on regional precipitation, while there were few studies on the underlying surface structure and the change of regional water resources in the water–air cycle [17,18,19]. It was found that the change of urban construction land has an important influence on the change of regional precipitation, vegetation, and land surface temperature, but it failed to quantitatively express the influence among them [20,21,22]. By analyzing long-term precipitation data, Zhang et al. found that the rapid expansion of urban land in Beijing since 1981 was statistically correlated with the decrease of summer precipitation in the northeast of Beijing from 1981 to 2005, and that the rise of surface temperature and the decrease of evaporation caused by urban expansion were the possible reasons for the change of summer rainfall [23]. In addition, the change in the spatial and temporal pattern of precipitation caused by the change of single land cover land use type has been observed and simulated by many scholars [24,25,26]. In terms of the change of forest types, some scholars found that deforestation and large-scale deforestation would lead to a significant decrease of average precipitation in all regions, and the conversion of tropical forests to barren would lead to a greater regional precipitation reduction than the conversion of grasslands. Large-scale afforestation in the pan-tropical and western European regions would increase precipitation [27,28]. In East Asia, Madi et al. used the CCSM (Community Climate System Model) to study and find that with the increasing of forest coverage in east Asian monsoon areas, the annual average precipitation increased, and the precipitation in April increased the most significantly, reaching 7% [29]. Precipitation and the variations of land cover land use type considered the influence of each other, and most of the simulations showed that the farmland and pasture expanded at the expense of the trees and shrubs, and precipitation and surface temperature rise in the resulting Sahel region fell [30]. Studies have shown that when crops in the underlying surfaces of urban agglomerations in different regions in eastern China were changed to bare soil, evaporation reduced local water vapor significantly, which ultimately led to a decrease in precipitation [31]. In addition to the above studies, there were also studies on the change of land cover land use caused by a certain event and its influence on regional climate and precipitation. The construction of dams for agricultural irrigation affected the distribution of precipitation in the region [32]. The change of land cover land use did not exist in isolation but was accompanied by the mutual transformation of different land cover land use types. These transformation processes were often complex and difficult to distinguish separately, and their impacts on regional climate and precipitation were also different.
Therefore, the effect of LCLUC on the spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation needs to be further studied. In this study, transfer matrix, standard deviation ellipse and spatial autocorrelation analysis techniques were used to analyze the impact of land cover land use change, especially construction land and cropland change on regional precipitation.

2. Study Area

The Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) is located between 111°21′E and 114°53′E and between 21°28′N and 24°29′N (Figure 1). It consists of Hongkong, Macao, and nine cities in Guangdong Province, covering a total area of 56,000 square kilometers. Affected by the subtropical humid climate, the GBA is warm and humid all year round, cloudy, and rainy, with an average annual precipitation of 1800 mm and an average annual temperature of 21.4–22.4 °C [33]. Most of this region is lower than 200 m above sea level. Land cover land use types in the area include forest and grass land, water, cropland, construction land and other unused land. In the central Pearl River Delta alluvial plain, urbanization is highly concentrated and surrounded by cropland, with hills and mountains as the main three sides. Since 2000, the urbanization in the study area has developed rapidly, the land cover land use structure has undergone drastic changes, and the area of construction land has increased rapidly.

3. Data and Methods

3.1. Land Cover Land Use Data

For the study of LCLUC, this study uses MODIS product data, which is the MCD12Q1v006 dataset. The MCD12Q1v006 dataset supplies global maps of land cover land use at annual time steps and 500 m spatial resolution from 2001–present. The data include the land cover land use maps set up by five different types of classification. Also included are a Quality Assurance (QA) layer, the posterior probabilities for the land cover land use classification system layers, and the binary land water mask used by the product. And in this study area, according to the results of the QA layer, the data quality is high.
In this paper, the global land cover land use classification scheme of the International Geosphere Biosphere Program (IGBP) is used. In the MCD12Q1v006 dataset, the annual IGBP classification contains a total of 17 land cover land use subcategories, which is a classification system based on global land cover land use. However, some taxonomic categories, such as permanent snow and ice cover, do not exist in the climatic conditions in the study area. In addition, this study focuses on revealing the influence rules of land cover land use change on precipitation on the background of rapid urbanization. Therefore, the original 17 land cover land use subcategories were reclassified, which mainly included forest and grass land, water, cropland, construction land and barren.

3.2. Precipitation Data

The Precipitation data used in this paper are the Integrated multi-satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG). It is also the successor of the Tropical Rainfall Measurement Mission (TRMM). The United States and Japan have jointly proposed a new global precipitation monitoring program. The IMERG Final Run data set is obtained by calibrating, merging, and interpolating all satellite microwave precipitation estimates. In this study, the inverse distance weight method is used to carry out spatial interpolation, and the accuracy of the result is 99%. Its spatial resolution is 0.1° by 0.1°.

3.3. Methods

3.3.1. Land Cover Land Use Data and Precipitation Data Processing

Based on the obtained land cover land use data and precipitation data, to complete the research objectives proposed in this paper, the land cover land use data and precipitation data are processed, respectively. The detailed processing process is shown in Figure 2.
Firstly, the land cover land use data are preprocessed, which mainly includes projection conversion, image mosaic and data format conversion. Secondly, the existing land cover land use classification is combined with the needs of this study into forest/grassland, water, cropland, construction land and barren, as shown in Table 1. Then, the land cover land use data in the research area is clipped based on pretreatment, and raster data is converted into vector data. Finally, the transfer matrix was used to analyze the spatial transformation relationship of land cover land use types in different periods in 2001, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2016 and 2019.

3.3.2. Analysis Method of Temporal and Spatial Change of Land Cover Land Use and Precipitation

The land cover land use transfer matrix [34,35] reflects the dynamic process information of the mutual transformation between different land cover land use types and areas in a certain period, and reflects the direction of land cover land use change guided by human activities. In this study, a total of 6 time periods of land cover land use transfer matrix statistical analysis, namely 2001–2004, 2004–2008, 2008–2011, 2011–2016, 2016–2019 and 2001–2019. The spatial autocorrelation method is used to analyze the spatial and temporal variation of precipitation.

3.3.3. Elliptic Analysis of the Standard Deviation of Precipitation Data

The standard deviation ellipse [36,37] is useful to analyze the spatial and temporal variation of precipitation centers and the trend of spatial distribution of precipitation regions. The long axis and the short axis of the ellipse surface were output, as well as the direction of the ellipse. The direction represents the rotation angle of the long axis measured clockwise from the vertex. Many scholars have used this method to carry out research on spatial change [38,39,40,41].
In this study, spatial interpolation is first carried out according to the value of each pixel of precipitation satellite data, and then resampling is conducted based on the interpolation results. After resampling, the spatial resolution of precipitation data is 500 m, which is consistent with the spatial resolution of land cover land use data.

4. Results

4.1. Spatial and Temporal Change Analysis of Land Cover Land Use from 2001 to 2019

4.1.1. Analysis on the Characteristics of Land Cover Land Use Time Change

From 2001 to 2019, land cover land use in the GBA has undergone great changes (Figure 3). The area of cropland has been decreased; the area of construction land has been increased significantly. The area of forest/grassland and water area fluctuated slightly around the average line. Among them, the cropland area showed a linear downward trend (R2 was 0.92), and the construction land area showed a linear upward trend (R2 was 0.80). Compared with 2001, in 2019, the area of cropland in the GBA decreased by 44.03%, the area of water area decreased by 8.05%, the area of barren decreased by 50.22%, the area of forest/grassland decreased by 0.43% and the area of construction land increased by 20.05%.
From the analysis of inter-annual changes (Table 2), the area of forest/grassland, water and barren decreased sharply, the area of construction land increased rapidly, and the area of cropland basically remained unchanged during 2001–2004. The change of land cover land use structure was mainly the transformation of forest/grassland, water, and barren into construction land, with the construction land area increasing by 635.73 km2, water area decreasing by 229.47 km2, forest/grassland area decreasing by 209.08 km2 and barren area decreasing by 203.06 km2. From 2004 to 2008, the area of water and cropland continued to decrease while the area of construction land continued to increase. The construction land area increased by 451.66 km2, the water area decreased by 218.95 km2, and the cropland area decreased by 273.28 km2. From 2008 to 2011, the area of barren and cropland decreased by 104.60 km2 and 248.67 km2, respectively, while the area of construction land, water and forest/grassland increased by 132.05, 96.03 and 125.19 km2, respectively. From 2011 to 2016, the cropland area continued to decrease at a high rate. In this stage, the cropland area decreased by 199.37 km2, and the water area continued the growth trend of the previous stage, with the area increasing by 106.69 km2, and the construction land area’s increased speed further slowed down. From 2016 to 2019, land cover land use changes were mainly concentrated in construction land, with an increase of 108.95 km2.

4.1.2. Analysis of Spatial Variation Characteristics of Land Cover Land Use

The land cover land use types of GBA were mainly forest/grassland, accounting for about 70% of the total land area, mainly distributed in Zhaoqing city, Jiangmen City and Huizhou city. Construction land was mainly concentrated in the Plain area of the Pearl River Delta (Figure 4). In 2001, cropland was mainly distributed in Zhaoqing city, Jiangmen City and Huizhou city, while construction land was mainly distributed in Guangzhou city, Dongguan City, Shenzhen City and Foshan City (Figure 4a). During 2001–2008, with the development of the social economy, the construction land area increased rapidly (Figure 5a,b). At the same time, the area of cropland continued to decreased, which was mainly concentrated in Zhaoqing City, Huaiji County, Jiangmen Enping City, Kaiping City, Taishan City, Boluo County, Huizhou City and Huicheng City. From 2008 to 2019, the area of construction land continued to increase, but the space changed, radiating from the concentrated and contiguous Pearl River Delta to the surrounding cities (Figure 5c–e).

4.2. Spatial and Temporal Change Analysis of Precipitation from 2001 to 2019

According to the monthly scale precipitation data of IMERG Final Run V06B data set, the annual cumulative total precipitation was obtained by adding the monthly scale data of each year. The annual cumulative precipitation in the research area was clipped. Then, based on the measured precipitation data and satellite precipitation data from 26 observation stations in the GBA, the correlation was established to conduct spatial calibration of satellite precipitation data. The analysis results (Figure 6) showed that the absolute value of the annual scale data of the IMERG Final Run V06B data set in the GBA was about two times smaller overall, but the linear correlation between the measured value and the satellite rainfall data was high, and the value of R2 was 0.94.

4.2.1. Analysis of Annual Precipitation Change

From 2001 to 2019, the annual precipitation in the GBA fluctuated around the mean line (Figure 7). Among them, there was a great variation among years, with a difference of more than 1000 mm/year between the year with extremely little rain and the year with an extreme amount of rain. The year with extremely little rain mainly included 2004 and 2011, with precipitation around 1400 mm. The year with an extreme amount of rain mainly included 2001, 2008 and 2016, with annual precipitation around 2400 mm. Among them, from 2001 to 2004, the annual precipitation decreased sharply, by about 50%. From 2004 to 2008, the annual precipitation showed a fluctuating upward trend, increasing by about 50%. From 2008 to 2011, annual precipitation showed a fluctuating downward trend, decreasing by about 50%. From 2011 to 2016, the annual precipitation showed a fluctuating rising trend, increasing by about 50%. It showed an upward trend from 2016 to 2019.
During the period from 2001 to 2019, the spatial distribution of precipitation in the GBA also changed greatly and showed certain regularities. In the years with sufficient precipitation, the spatial distribution of precipitation was wide and mainly concentrated in the coastal areas within the GBA, such as 2001 (Figure 8a), 2008 (Figure 8c) and 2016 (Figure 8e). In the years with relatively low precipitation (Figure 8b), the spatial distribution range of precipitation was small, mainly concentrated in the central part of the study area, which was the region with the highest degree of urbanization.
At the same time, the central position of precipitation has also changed. During the period of 2001–2019, the precipitation centers in the GBA were mainly concentrated in the Nanhai District of Foshan (2004, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2016), Shunde District (2002, 2010, 2018), Haizhu District of Guangzhou (2006, 2015) and Panyu District of Guangzhou (2001, 2003, 2007, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2019), as shown in Figure 9.
The elliptic analysis of standard deviation (Figure 10) showed that the spatial distribution of precipitation was mainly south to the east (from Zhaoqing to Foshan to Guangzhou to Dongguan) and north to the east (from Jiangmen to Foshan to Guangzhou). The spatial distribution of precipitation in 2003, 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2019 was east-by-north, and that in 2001, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 was east-by-south.

4.2.2. Variation Trend of Precipitation in Different Seasons

According to the monthly precipitation data of the GBA from 2001 to 2019, the precipitation of the four seasons of spring, summer, autumn and winter was obtained (Figure 11). In this paper, spring refers to March, April and May, summer refers to June, July, August, autumn refers to September, October and November, and winter refers to December, January, and February. The results showed that in the past 18 years, the precipitation in the GBA was mainly concentrated in spring and summer, and the precipitation in spring tended to increase gradually, while the precipitation in summer tended to decrease gradually, while the precipitation in autumn and winter had no obvious change.

4.3. The Relationship between Land Cover Land Use Change and Precipitation Change

The annual cumulative precipitation decreased dramatically during 2001–2004, by about 50 percent, reaching its lowest point in 2004 (Figure 7). During this period, the area of forest/grassland, water and barren decreased sharply, the area of construction land increased rapidly, and the area of cropland basically remained unchanged (Figure 3). The maximum extreme precipitation occurred in 2002 and 2003, and the minimum extreme precipitation occurred in 2004 (Figure 7). In terms of space, the cumulative precipitation reduction during 2001–2004 was mainly concentrated in Jiangmen, Foshan, Zhongshan, Zhuhai, Macao Special Administrative Region, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Huizhou, and the annual cumulative precipitation reduction exceeded 1000 mm. The annual cumulative precipitation in Zhaoqing decreased by about 500 mm, which was relatively small (Figure 12a). During this period, the land cover land use change on the space was mainly concentrated in the reduced precipitation area of the pearl river delta plain, and the land cover land use structure changed mainly forest/grassland and water, barren into construction land, as construction land area increased by 635.73 km2, then reduced by 229.47 km2, water area and forest/grassland area reduced 209.08 km2, and barren area by 203.06 km2.
The annual cumulative precipitation decreased dramatically during 2001–2004, by about 50 percent, reaching its lowest point in 2004 (Figure 7). During this period, the area of forest/grassland, water and barren decreased sharply, the area of construction land increased rapidly, and the area of cropland basically remained unchanged (Figure 3). The maximum extreme precipitation occurred in 2002 and 2003, and the minimum extreme precipitation occurred in 2004 (Figure 7). In terms of space, the cumulative precipitation reduction during 2001–2004 was mainly concentrated in Jiangmen, Foshan, Zhongshan, Zhuhai, Macao Special Administrative Region, Guangzhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Huizhou, and the annual cumulative precipitation reduction exceeded 1000 mm. The annual cumulative precipitation in Zhaoqing decreased by about 500 mm, which was relatively small (Figure 12a). During this period, the land cover land use change on the space mainly concentrated in the reduced precipitation area of the pearl river delta plain, and the land cover land use structure changed mainly forest/grassland and water, barren into construction land, construction land area increased by 635.73 km2, then decreased by 229.47 km2, water area and forest/grassland area reduced 209.08 km2, and barren area by 203.06 km2.
From 2004 to 2008 (Figure 12b), the annual cumulative precipitation showed an increased trend, and the spatial increase was mainly in Jiangmen City, Zhongshan City, Zhuhai City, Macao Special Administrative Region, Shenzhen City, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Huizhou city, with the annual cumulative precipitation increasing between 1000 and 1442 mm. The annual cumulative precipitation increased in Zhaoqing city, Guangzhou City and Foshan city was between 454 and 1000 mm. During this period, the area of water and cropland continued to decrease, while the area of construction land continued to increase. The land cover land use structure transformation was mainly concentrated in the central region of the GBA, included Guangzhou, Foshan, Dongguan, and other places.
From 2008 to 2011 (Figure 12c), the annual cumulative precipitation showed a decreasing trend. In 2009 and 2011, extreme precipitation occurred, and the spatial reduction areas were mainly concentrated in Jiangmen city, Zhuhai City, Zhongshan City, Dongguan City, Shenzhen City, Huizhou City, Macao Special Administrative Region and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The annual cumulative precipitation decreased was between 800 and 1401 mm. The annual cumulative precipitation in Zhaoqing city and the northern part of Guangzhou decreased by 459 to 800 mm. During this period, the cropland area decreased significantly, by 248.67 km2, and the land cover land use change was mainly distributed in the areas with a large decreased in precipitation. The research showed that a significant decrease in cropland area will reduce precipitation.
From 2011 to 2016 (Figure 12d), the annual cumulative precipitation showed an increasing trend, and the spatial increased was mainly in Huizhou, Dongguan, Shenzhen, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and Guangzhou, with the annual cumulative precipitation increasing between 1400 and 1710 mm. During this period, the water area continued the growth trend of the previous stage, with the area increasing by 106.69 km2 and the construction land area increasing at a slower rate.
There were differences in the spatial variation of annual cumulative precipitation from 2016 to 2019 (Figure 12e). Except for the increased of precipitation in the west of Jiangmen city, precipitation in other regions has decreased to different degrees. The change of land cover land use in the west of Jiangmen city was mainly the conversion of forest/grassland to cropland, while the water area in other areas was further reduced. The conversion of forest/grassland to cropland has an increased effect on regional precipitation.

5. Discussion

Studies have shown that LCLUC not only affected the energy exchange between land and atmosphere, but also affected the carbon and water cycle, changed the precipitation spatial pattern, and had a significant impact on urban waterlogging and flood frequency [42,43]. In this study, it was found that with the change of land cover land use, the spatial distribution of precipitation also changed. Especially in the areas where the change of construction land was concentrated, the spatial distribution of precipitation changed most obviously.
The GBA unique topography (Figure 1), with the east, west, north three sides surrounded by mountains, south facing the sea, over the years precipitation has generally been sufficient. In recent years, the spatial and temporal distribution of GBA precipitation has undergone some changes, and extreme rainfall has become more frequent [44]. According to the spatial and temporal distribution of precipitation from 2001 to 2019, it can be found that the spatial distribution of precipitation has changed (Figure 8). Before the high level of urbanization, precipitation was mainly concentrated in the southern coastal area of the study area. In this stage, the spatial distribution of precipitation was mainly affected by topography. With the development of urbanization, land cover land use changed dramatically in space, and the spatial distribution of precipitation began to change, mainly in highly urbanized areas.
Studies have shown that LCLUC has a certain impact on climate and regional precipitation, and many scholars have carried out related studies in this regard [1,2,3,10,12]. Some scholars have analyzed the influence of cropland, forest, and urban change on precipitation in specific regions [13,14,17,19,20]. However, there have been no reports on the spatial–temporal effects of LCLUC on precipitation in the GBA, especially construction land and cropland change on regional precipitation. What characteristics exist in this region need to be studied. The change of land cover land use in the GBA was mainly the decreasing of cropland and the increasing of construction land (Figure 3). At present, existing studies have found that the change of construction land has different effects on precipitation in different regions.
According to the analysis results in this study, in the GBA, in the early stage of urbanization, the impervious area of the city is small, the LCLUC is little, and the spatial distribution of precipitation was greatly affected by the topography. After high urbanization, the concentration of atmospheric aerosol over cities increased, which was more likely to lead to the occurrence of short-term heavy precipitation due to the overall sufficient precipitation in this region. This was consistent with the research conclusions of other scholars [45]. However, the results of this study showed that there was a certain statistical correlation between LCLUC and the temporal and spatial changes of precipitation. However, the precipitation is a complex process, and several factors affect the spatial and temporal changes. Therefore further studies are needed to understand changing trends.

6. Conclusions

From 2001 to 2019, both land cover land use and precipitation in the GBA have undergone drastic changes. Compared with 2001, in 2019, cropland area decreased by 44.03%, water area decreased by 8.05%, barren area decreased by 50.22%, forest/grassland area decreased by 0.43%, and construction land area increased by 20.05%.
The precipitation in the GBA was mainly concentrated in the spring and summer, and the precipitation in spring tended to increase gradually, while the precipitation in summer tended to decrease gradually, while the precipitation in autumn and winter had no obvious change.
The spatial distribution of precipitation changes with the continuous enhancement of human activities, with topographic factors and LCLUC as the main influencing factors.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.C.; Data curation, X.W.; Funding acquisition, P.C.; Investigation, Y.J., X.J. and J.W.; Methodology, P.C.; Resources, Y.H., P.C. and Y.J.; Supervision, Y.H. and P.C.; Writing—original draft, X.W.; Writing—review and editing, Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Research on the Influence of changes of underlying Surface of fusion Radar and optical remote sensing on Precipitation -- A case study of Guangzhou (No. 007073897022)” and “Research on regional net irrigation water quantity calculation Method based on remote sensing evapotranspiration model (No. 902229136010)”. This project was also funded by The Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, grant number 201605030009, 201803020036, and National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2018B030306026), Project supported by Guangdong Engineering and Research Center for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing of Agricultural Water and Soil Information, and Research on Key Technologies of Poultry Supply Chain Traceability Based on Blockchain Technology (No. 2019KZDZX1001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data from this research will be available upon request to the authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and reviewers for their comments on this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alireza, D.; Roy, B.; Ali, N.; Mostafa, P.; Ardavan, Z.; Fatemeh, F.M. Modelling the impacts of climate and land use change on water security in a semi-arid forested watershed using InVEST. J. Hydrol. 2021, 593, 125621. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eugenia, K.; Ming, C. Impact of urbanization and land-use change on climate. Nature 2003, 423, 528–531. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mahmood, R.; Sr, R.A.P.; Hubbard, K.G.; Niyogi, D.; Bonan, G.; Lawrence, P.; McNider, R.; McAlpine, C.; Etter, A.; Gameda, S.; et al. Impacts of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Climate and Future Research Priorities. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2010, 91, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Meshesha, T.W.; Tripathi, S.K.; Khare, D. Analyses of land use and land cover change dynamics using GIS and remote sensing during 1984 and 2015 in the Beressa Watershed Northern Central Highland of Ethiopia. Modeling Earth Syst. Environ. 2016, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Worku, T.; Khare, D.; Tripathi, S.K. Modeling runoff–sediment response to land use/land cover changes using integrated GIS and SWAT model in the Beressa watershed. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Worku, T.; Tripathi, S.K.; Khare, D. Household level tree planting and its implication for environmental conservation in the Beressa Watershed of Ethiopia. Environ. Syst. Res. 2018, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Meshesha, T.W.; Tripathi, S.K. Farmer’s perception on soil erosion and land degradation problems and management practices in the Beressa Watershed of Ethiopia. J. Water Resour. Ocean Sci. 2016, 5, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hamere, Y.; Teshome, S.; Mekuria, A.; Ashraf, D. Changes in landscape composition and configuration in the Beressa watershed, Blue Nile basin of Ethiopian Highlands: Historical and future exploration. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04859. [Google Scholar]
  9. Oskar, E.; Pål, B.; Göran, B.; Nicolae, S.; Jean, F.D.; Bruna, G.; Ioannis, D.; Blas, M.Y.; Fernando, F. Beneficial land use change: Strategic expansion of new biomass plantations can reduce environmental impacts from EU agriculture. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2020, 60, 101990. [Google Scholar]
  10. Costanza, R.; De, G.R.; Sutton, P.; Vander, P.S.; Anderson, S.J.; Kubiszewski, I.; Farber, S.; Turner, R.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 26, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hernández, M.M.; Plieninger, T.; Bieling, C. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 29, 434–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, B.; Huang, F.; Qin, L.; Qi, H.; Sun, N. Spatio-Temporal Variations of Carbon Use Efficiency in Natural Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Relationship with Climatic Factors in the Songnen Plain, China. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Junkermann, W.; Hacker, J.; Lyons, T.; Nair, U. Land use change suppresses precipitation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 6531–6539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bounoua, L.; DeFries, R.; Collatz, G.J.; Sellers, P.; Khan, H. Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Clim. Chang. 2002, 52, 29–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pitman, A.J.; de Noblet-Ducoudré, N.; Avila, F.B.; Alexander, L.V.; Boisier, J.P.; Brovkin, V.; Delire, C.; Cruz, F.; Donat, M.G.; Gayler, V. Effects of land cover change on temperature. Earth Syst. Dyn. 2012, 3, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yan, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, Z.; Ning, L. Biogeophysical impacts of land use/land cover change on 20th century anthropogenic climate compared to the impacts of greenhouse gas change. Int. J. Clim. 2020, 40, 6560–6573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jin, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yan, Y.; Cong, P. A Semi-Parametric Geographically Weighted Regression Approach to Exploring Driving Factors of Fractional Vegetation Cover: A Case Study of Guangdong. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Z.; Xu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhao, B. Urbanization-driven changes in land-climate dynamics: A case study of Haihe River Basin, China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jin, Y.; Liu, X.; Yao, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H. Mapping the annual dynamics of cultivated land in typical area of the Middle-lower Yangtze plain using long time-series of Landsat images based on Google Earth Engine. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2020, 41, 1625–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jin, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, Y.; Liang, X. Land-cover mapping using Random Forest classification and incorporating NDVI time-series and texture: A case study of central Shandong. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2018, 39, 8703–8723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Q.; Zhao, X.; Wu, D.; Tang, R.; Du, X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, J.; Xu, P.; Peng, Y. Impact of urbanization and climate on vegetation coverage in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region of China. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Tariq, A.; Shu, H. CA-Markov Chain Analysis of Seasonal Land Surface Temperature and Land Use Landcover Change Using Optical Multi-Temporal Satellite Data of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, C.L.; Chen, F.; Miao, S.G.; Li, Q.C.; Xia, X.A.; Xuan, C.Y. Impacts of urban expansion and future green planting on summer precipitation in the Beijing metropolitan area. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2009, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feng, J.M.; Wang, Y.L.; Ma, Z.G.; Liu, Y.H. Simulating the regional impacts of urbanization and anthropogenic heat release on climate across China. J. Clim. 2012, 25, 7187–7203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Freitag, B.M.; Nair, U.S.; Niyogi, D. Urban modification of convection and rainfall in complex terrain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2018, 45, 2507–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Y.; Stanturf, J.; Lu, H. Modeling the Potential of the Northern China Forest Shelterbelt in Improving Hydroclimate Conditions 1. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2008, 44, 1176–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gálos, B.; Hagemann, S.; Hänsler, A.; Kindermann, G.; Rechid, D.; Sieck, K.; Teichmann, C.; Jacob, D. Case study for the assessment of the biogeophysical effects of a potential afforestation in Europe. Carbon Balance Manag. 2013, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Perugini, L.; Caporaso, L.; Marconi, S.; Cescatti, A.; Quesada, B.; de Noblet-Ducoudre, N.; House, J.I.; Arneth, A. Biophysical effects on temperature and precipitation due to land cover change. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ma, D.; Liu, Z.; Lü, S.; Michael, N.; Rong, X.; Cheng, G.; Wang, F. Short-term climatic impacts of afforestation in the East Asian monsoon region. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 2073–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hagos, S.; Leung, L.R.; Xue, Y.; Boone, A.; de Sales, F.; Neupane, N.; Huang, M.; Yoon, J.H. Assessment of uncertainties in the response of the African monsoon precipitation to land use change simulated by a regional model. Clim. Dyn. 2014, 43, 2765–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhou, L.; Jiang, Z.; Li, Z.X.; Yang, X.Q. Numerical simulation of urbanization climate effects in regions of east China. Chin. J. Atmos. Sci. 2015, 39, 596–610. [Google Scholar]
  32. Woldemichael, A.T.; Hossain, F.; Pielke Sr, R.; Beltrán-Przekurat, A. Understanding the impact of dam-triggered land use/land cover change on the modification of extreme precipitation. Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, X.; Yan, F.; Su, F. Impacts of Urbanization on the Ecosystem Services in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Qiao, W.; Sheng, Y.; Fang, B. Land use change information mining in highly urbanized area based on transfer matrix: A case study of Suzhou, Jiangsu Province. Geogr. Res. 2013, 32, 1497–1507. [Google Scholar]
  35. Allard, J.F.; Atalla, N. Extensions to the Transfer Matrix Method; John Wiley Sons Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rahman, M.; Yang, R.; Di, L. Clustering Indian Ocean Tropical Cyclone Tracks by the Standard Deviational Ellipse. Climate 2018, 6, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gong, J. Clarifying the Standard Deviational Ellipse. Geogr. Anal. 2002, 34, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, L.; Yang, A.M.; Xia, X.X.; Wu, H.Q. Spatial distribution pattern and change characteristics analysis of cultivated land in the Manas River Basin from 1975 to 2015. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2020, 28, 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, B.J. Theories and methods for soil grain orientation distribution in SEM by standard deviational ellipse. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2009, 07, 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhou, T.; Niu, A.Y.; Ma, J.J.; Xu, S.J. Spatio-temporal pattern of national wetland parks. J. Nat. Resour. 2019, 034, 26–39. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gai, M.; Zhu, J.M.; Sun, C.Z.; Xu, K. Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of Marine economic efficiency in China’s coastal areas. Resour. Sci. 2018, 40, 68–81. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zope, P.E.; Eldho, T.I.; Jothiprakash, V. Impacts of land use–land cover change and urbanization on flooding: A case study of Oshiwara River Basin in Mumbai, India. Catena 2016, 145, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tarigan, S.D. Land cover change and its impact on flooding frequency of Batanghari Watershed, Jambi Province, Indonesia. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 33, 386–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Chen, W.L.; Xia, J. Analysis of causes and countermeasures of extraordinary rainstorm in 22nd, May, Guangzhou. Chin. J. Water Resour. 2020, 13, 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, H.; Wu, C.; Chen, W.; Huang, G.R. Effect of urban expansion on summer rainfall in the pearl river delta, south china. J. Hydrol. 2019, 568, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Remotesensing 13 01135 g001 550
Figure 1. Map of study area. The elevation data are provided by International Scientific and Technical Data Mirror Site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Figure 1. Map of study area. The elevation data are provided by International Scientific and Technical Data Mirror Site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g001
Remotesensing 13 01135 g002 550
Figure 2. Methodological workflow.
Figure 2. Methodological workflow.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g002
Remotesensing 13 01135 g003 550
Figure 3. Land cover land use changed in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) from 2001 to 2019. (a) Cropland changed, (b) Construction land changed, (c) Barren changed, (d) Forest/grassland changed, (e) Water changed.
Figure 3. Land cover land use changed in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) from 2001 to 2019. (a) Cropland changed, (b) Construction land changed, (c) Barren changed, (d) Forest/grassland changed, (e) Water changed.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g003
Remotesensing 13 01135 g004 550
Figure 4. The spatial distribution of land cover land use in the GBA in 2001, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2016 and 2019.
Figure 4. The spatial distribution of land cover land use in the GBA in 2001, 2004, 2008, 2011, 2016 and 2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g004
Remotesensing 13 01135 g005 550
Figure 5. The spatial distribution of land cover land use changed in the GBA from 2001 to 2019.
Figure 5. The spatial distribution of land cover land use changed in the GBA from 2001 to 2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g005
Remotesensing 13 01135 g006 550
Figure 6. Correlation between observation station measurements and satellite rainfall data.
Figure 6. Correlation between observation station measurements and satellite rainfall data.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g006
Remotesensing 13 01135 g007 550
Figure 7. Total annual precipitation from 2001 to 2019.
Figure 7. Total annual precipitation from 2001 to 2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g007
Remotesensing 13 01135 g008 550
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of precipitation in the GBA, 2001–2019.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of precipitation in the GBA, 2001–2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g008
Remotesensing 13 01135 g009 550
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of precipitation centers in the GBA from 2001 to 2019.
Figure 9. Spatial distribution of precipitation centers in the GBA from 2001 to 2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g009
Remotesensing 13 01135 g010 550
Figure 10. Spatial variation trend of precipitation in GBA from 2001 to 2019.
Figure 10. Spatial variation trend of precipitation in GBA from 2001 to 2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g010
Remotesensing 13 01135 g011 550
Figure 11. Total precipitation in the four quarters from 2001 to 2019.
Figure 11. Total precipitation in the four quarters from 2001 to 2019.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g011
Remotesensing 13 01135 g012 550
Figure 12. Spatial superposition map of land cover land use change and precipitation change.
Figure 12. Spatial superposition map of land cover land use change and precipitation change.
Remotesensing 13 01135 g012
Table
Table 1. Land cover land use types and reclassification.
Table 1. Land cover land use types and reclassification.
Land Cover Land Use TypesReclassification
Evergreen Needleleaf Forests, Evergreen Broadleaf Forests, Deciduous Needleleaf Forests, Deciduous Broadleaf Forests, Mixed Forests, Closed Shrublands, Open Shrublands, Woody Savannas, Savannas, Grasslands, Cropland/Natural Vegetation MosaicsForest/grassland
Water Bodies, Permanent WetlandsWater
CroplandsCropland
Urban and Built-up LandsConstruction land
Barren, Permanent Snow and IceBarren
Table
Table 2. Land cover land use changed for different types in the GBA (km2).
Table 2. Land cover land use changed for different types in the GBA (km2).
2001–20042004–20082008–20112011–20162016–20192001–2019
Land cover land useCropland−5.88273.28248.67199.37−4.81710.63
Barren203.06-42.05104.60−26.63−11.96227.02
Construction land−635.73−451.66−132.05−87.00−108.95−1415.39
Water229.47218.95−96.03−106.6963.10308.80
Forest/grassland209.081.48−125.1920.9562.62168.94
Note—greater than 0 means an increase in area, and less than 0 means a decrease in area.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Cong, P.; Jin, Y.; Jia, X.; Wang, J.; Han, Y. Assessing the Effects of Land Cover Land Use Change on Precipitation Dynamics in Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area from 2001 to 2019. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061135

AMA Style

Wang X, Cong P, Jin Y, Jia X, Wang J, Han Y. Assessing the Effects of Land Cover Land Use Change on Precipitation Dynamics in Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area from 2001 to 2019. Remote Sensing. 2021; 13(6):1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061135

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xinghan, Peitong Cong, Yuhao Jin, Xichun Jia, Junshu Wang, and Yuxing Han. 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Land Cover Land Use Change on Precipitation Dynamics in Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area from 2001 to 2019" Remote Sensing 13, no. 6: 1135. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13061135

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop