Next Article in Journal
Himawari-8/AHI Aerosol Optical Depth Detection Based on Machine Learning Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Assessment of BDS-3 PPP-B2b/INS Loosely Coupled Integration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Environmental and Atmospheric Influences in the Use of SAR and Optical Imagery from Sentinel-1, Landsat-8, and Sentinel-2 in the Operational Monitoring of Reservoir Water Level
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Oil Rig Classification in C-Band SAR Images

1
Department of Telecommunications, Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), São José dos Campos 12228-900, Brazil
2
Department of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH), 371 79 Karlskrona, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(13), 2966; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132966
Submission received: 1 May 2022 / Revised: 14 June 2022 / Accepted: 17 June 2022 / Published: 21 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Spaceborne SAR – Technology and Applications)

Abstract

This article aims at performing maritime target classification in SAR images using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques. In particular, the targets of interest are oil platforms and ships located in the Campos Basin, Brazil. Two convolutional neural networks (CNNs), VGG-16 and VGG-19, were used for attribute extraction. The logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbours (kNN), decision tree (DT), naive Bayes (NB), neural networks (NET), and AdaBoost (ADBST) schemes were considered for classification. The target classification methods were evaluated using polarimetric images obtained from the C-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) system Sentinel-1. Classifiers are assessed by the accuracy indicator. The LR, SVM, NET, and stacking results indicate better performance, with accuracy ranging from 84.1% to 85.5%. The Kruskal–Wallis test shows a significant difference with the tested classifier, indicating that some classifiers present different accuracy results. The optimizations provide results with more significant accuracy gains, making them competitive with those shown in the literature. There is no exact combination of methods for SAR image classification that will always guarantee the best accuracy. The optimizations performed in this article were for the specific data set of the Campos Basin, and results may change depending on the data set format and the number of images.
Keywords: classification algorithms; deep learning; machine learning; oil rig classification; SAR; ship classification classification algorithms; deep learning; machine learning; oil rig classification; SAR; ship classification

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Silva, F.G.; Ramos, L.P.; Palm, B.G.; Machado, R. Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Oil Rig Classification in C-Band SAR Images. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132966

AMA Style

da Silva FG, Ramos LP, Palm BG, Machado R. Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Oil Rig Classification in C-Band SAR Images. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(13):2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132966

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Silva, Fabiano G., Lucas P. Ramos, Bruna G. Palm, and Renato Machado. 2022. "Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Oil Rig Classification in C-Band SAR Images" Remote Sensing 14, no. 13: 2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132966

APA Style

da Silva, F. G., Ramos, L. P., Palm, B. G., & Machado, R. (2022). Assessment of Machine Learning Techniques for Oil Rig Classification in C-Band SAR Images. Remote Sensing, 14(13), 2966. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14132966

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop