Meta-Analysis and Visualization of the Literature on Early Identification of Flash Floods
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
My full review is attached as a PDF file. Two excerpts from my overall comments: I find this analysis to be a useful contribution to our field, and I look forward to seeing it published. I am confident the manuscript will be acceptable for publication, after major revisions.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.doc
Reviewer 2 Report
The manuscript analyses and reviews the Early Identification Technology of Flash Floods. Despite the fact that the paper is of appropriate length and contains valuable information, some sections should be revised and written in a more formal tone with better grammar and syntax. It would be imperative if the authors would take the time to consider revising the points in the attached PDF file.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.doc
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
I thank the authors for their numerous revisions to the manuscript, which I hope have improved its quality and will ultimately make it more popular with our readers. I again say that I look forward to it being published.
(Additional comments in the attached PDF)
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx