Non-Line-of-Sight Target Detection Based on Dual-View Observation with Single-Channel UWB Radar
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Pls, check the PDF attachment.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
In this article, the authors present a case study of non-line-of-sight target detection based on dual sight. Observation with single channel UWB radar. The topic is considered to be of interest to readers of Remote Sensing magazine. However, a major review of the discussion section of the text would be necessary to improve/purify certain aspects of the wording before proceeding to its possible publication.
My specific comment is as follows:
1st) Discussion: This section lacks the discussion part of the results obtained. It is essential that the authors present a discussion of the results comparing them with those obtained by other authors in similar investigations in order to provide new results, establish the pertinent measures and validate the results obtained.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 3 Report
The paper is based on obtainining better detection results in Non-Line-Of-Sight (NLOS) region of urban environment, an imaging method of NLOS targets based on dual-view observation. It uses the multipath imaging algorithm and propagation model to analyse imaging results on three phenomena of path ambiguity in range profile and their influence. The study uses sound scientific approach for methodology and problem analysis. This is a very well written paper which addresss all aspects of theoretical background and experimental analysis. I recommend it for publication.
Author Response
We appreciate the time and efforts for your careful reading of the manuscript. Sincere thanks should be given to you for the recognition of our manuscript and recommendation for publication.
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors have responded to my questions, and I recommend publishing the paper in its current state.
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have responded and corrected the suggestions made.
