Next Article in Journal
A New Data Processing System for Generating Sea Ice Surface Roughness Products from the Multi-Angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) Imagery
Next Article in Special Issue
Weakened Impacts of the East Asia-Pacific Teleconnection on the Interannual Variability of Summertime Precipitation over South China since the Mid-2000s
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrological Connectivity Improves the Water-Related Environment in a Typical Arid Inland River Basin in Xinjiang, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Climate Sensitivity of the Arid Scrublands on the Tibetan Plateau Mediated by Plant Nutrient Traits and Soil Nutrient Availability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques

1
Canadian Centre for Climate Change and Adaptation, University of Prince Edward Island, St. Peter’s Bay, PE C0A 2A0, Canada
2
School of Climate Change and Adaptation, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
3
School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada
4
Department of Agriculture and Land, Government of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4N6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(19), 4978; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978
Submission received: 13 September 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 3 October 2022 / Published: 6 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing for Climate Change)

Abstract

Accurate land use land cover (LULC) classification is vital for the sustainable management of natural resources and to learn how the landscape is changing due to climate. For accurate and efficient LULC classification, high-quality datasets and robust classification methods are required. With the increasing availability of satellite data, geospatial analysis tools, and classification methods, it is essential to systematically assess the performance of different combinations of satellite data and classification methods to help select the best approach for LULC classification. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the LULC classification performance of two commonly used platforms (i.e., ArcGIS Pro and Google Earth Engine) with different satellite datasets (i.e., Landsat, Sentinel, and Planet) through a case study for the city of Charlottetown in Canada. Specifically, three classifiers in ArcGIS Pro, including support vector machine (SVM), maximum likelihood (ML), and random forest/random tree (RF/RT), are utilized to develop LULC maps over the period of 2017–2021. Whereas four classifiers in Google Earth Engine, including SVM, RF/RT, minimum distance (MD), and classification and regression tree (CART), are used to develop LULC maps for the same period. To identify the most efficient and accurate classifier, the overall accuracy and kappa coefficient for each classifier is calculated throughout the study period for all combinations of satellite data, classification platforms, and methods. Change detection is then conducted using the best classifier to quantify the LULC changes over the study period. Results show that the SVM classifier in both ArcGIS Pro and Google Earth Engine presents the best performance compared to other classifiers. In particular, the SVM in ArcGIS Pro shows an overall accuracy of 89% with Landsat, 91% with Sentinel, and 94% with Planet. Similarly, in Google Earth Engine, the SVM shows an accuracy of 87% with Landsat 8 and 92% with Sentinel 2. Furthermore, change detection results show that 13.80% and 14.10% of forest areas have been turned into bare land and urban class, respectively, and 3.90% of the land has been converted into the urban area from 2017 to 2021, suggesting the intensive urbanization. The results of this study will provide the scientific basis for selecting the remote sensing classifier and satellite imagery to develop accurate LULC maps.
Keywords: remote sensing; LULC classification; ArcGIS Pro; Google Earth Engine; machine learning; change detection remote sensing; LULC classification; ArcGIS Pro; Google Earth Engine; machine learning; change detection

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Basheer, S.; Wang, X.; Farooque, A.A.; Nawaz, R.A.; Liu, K.; Adekanmbi, T.; Liu, S. Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4978. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978

AMA Style

Basheer S, Wang X, Farooque AA, Nawaz RA, Liu K, Adekanmbi T, Liu S. Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(19):4978. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978

Chicago/Turabian Style

Basheer, Sana, Xiuquan Wang, Aitazaz A. Farooque, Rana Ali Nawaz, Kai Liu, Toyin Adekanmbi, and Suqi Liu. 2022. "Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques" Remote Sensing 14, no. 19: 4978. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978

APA Style

Basheer, S., Wang, X., Farooque, A. A., Nawaz, R. A., Liu, K., Adekanmbi, T., & Liu, S. (2022). Comparison of Land Use Land Cover Classifiers Using Different Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques. Remote Sensing, 14(19), 4978. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194978

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop