Next Article in Journal
GIS-Based Simulation for Landfill Site Selection in Mekong Delta: A Specific Application in Ben Tre Province
Next Article in Special Issue
Coseismic Deformation and Fault Inversion of the 2017 Jiuzhaigou Ms 7.0 Earthquake: Constraints from Steerable Pyramid and InSAR Observations
Previous Article in Journal
Quantifying the Impact of Dust Sources on Urban Physical Growth and Vegetation Status: A Case Study of Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Routine Processing and Automatic Detection of Volcanic Ground Deformation Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Data: Insights from African Volcanoes

1
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, IRD, Univ. Gustave Eiffel, ISTerre, 38000 Grenoble, France
2
COMET, School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, UK
3
COMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(22), 5703; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225703
Submission received: 12 September 2022 / Revised: 23 October 2022 / Accepted: 26 October 2022 / Published: 11 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis of SAR/InSAR Data in Geoscience)

Abstract

Since the launch of Sentinel-1 mission, automated processing systems have been developed for near real-time monitoring of ground deformation signals. Here, we perform a regional analysis of 5 years over 64 volcanic centres located along the East African Rift System (EARS). We show that the correction of atmospheric signals for the arid and low-elevation EARS volcanoes is less important than for other volcanic environments. We find that the amplitude of the cumulative displacements exceeds three times the temporal noise of the time series (3σ) for 16 of the 64 volcanoes, which includes previously reported deformation signals, and two new ones at Paka and Silali volcanoes. From a 5-year times series, uncertainties in rates of deformation are ∼0.1 cm/yr, whereas uncertainties associated with the choice of reference pixel are typically 0.3–0.6 cm/yr. We fit the time series using simple functional forms and classify seven of the volcano time series as ‘linear’, six as ‘sigmoidal’ and three as ‘hybrid’, enabling us to discriminate between steady deformation and short-term pulses of deformation. This study provides a framework for routine volcano monitoring using InSAR on a continental scale. Here, we focus on Sentinel-1 data from the EARS, but the framework could be expanded to include other satellite systems or global coverage.
Keywords: Sentinel-1 SAR; volcanic ground deformation; East Africa Sentinel-1 SAR; volcanic ground deformation; East Africa

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albino, F.; Biggs, J.; Lazecký, M.; Maghsoudi, Y. Routine Processing and Automatic Detection of Volcanic Ground Deformation Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Data: Insights from African Volcanoes. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225703

AMA Style

Albino F, Biggs J, Lazecký M, Maghsoudi Y. Routine Processing and Automatic Detection of Volcanic Ground Deformation Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Data: Insights from African Volcanoes. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(22):5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albino, Fabien, Juliet Biggs, Milan Lazecký, and Yasser Maghsoudi. 2022. "Routine Processing and Automatic Detection of Volcanic Ground Deformation Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Data: Insights from African Volcanoes" Remote Sensing 14, no. 22: 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225703

APA Style

Albino, F., Biggs, J., Lazecký, M., & Maghsoudi, Y. (2022). Routine Processing and Automatic Detection of Volcanic Ground Deformation Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Data: Insights from African Volcanoes. Remote Sensing, 14(22), 5703. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop