Next Article in Journal
Prediction Models of ≥2 MeV Electron Daily Fluences for 3 Days at GEO Orbit Using a Long Short-Term Memory Network
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Evaluation of the Flood Potential Index and Its Driving Factors across the Volga River Basin Based on Combined Satellite Gravity Observations
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness from a Parameter-Optimized Arctic Sea Ice–Ocean Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Estimation of Root-Zone Soil Moisture in Semi-Arid Areas Based on Remotely Sensed Data
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Evaluation of Terrestrial Water Storage and Flux in North China by Using GRACE Combined Gravity Field Solutions and Hydrometeorological Models

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(10), 2536; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102536
by Tengfei Feng 1, Yunzhong Shen 1,*, Qiujie Chen 1, Fengwei Wang 2 and Kunpu Ji 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(10), 2536; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102536
Submission received: 13 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 10 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please refer to the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The English writing is generally OK. Part of this MS can be improved, e.g., "mainly clustering in".

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

The article is interesting and I believe it has practical potential in use for water management. The authors have made a number of interesting maps, illustrating the spatial distribution of the analyzed parameters. The layout of the article as well as the materials used are appropriate for this type of study and the choice should be considered justified. However, the work requires some adjustments:

Figure 1: No reference of the analyzed area against the background of the whole of China. What was the criterion for the separation (formal or established by the authors) of the section in question?

Line 48-49: The input mainly refers to precipitation, while the output includes evaporation and both surface and subsurface runoff”.  This statement is true but has reference to natural boundaries, i.e. catchment areas. Here the authors consider regions in administrative terms.

In the article I do not find detailed information on the important component of the water balance that is retention. What I have in mind here is primarily changes in retention in the context of the expansion of dam reservoirs. What is their distribution? What effect does this have on the results obtained?

How was the pointwise influence of large cities on the spatial distribution of the analyzed variables within the analyzed regions eliminated?

It would be clearer to divide the chapter Results and discussions into two separate sections. The first clearly presenting the results obtained and the second relating these results to other studies of this type.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Back to TopTop