Next Article in Journal
Validation of Himawari-8 Sea Surface Temperature Retrievals Using Infrared SST Autonomous Radiometer Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Warm Core and Deep Convection in Medicanes: A Passive Microwave-Based Investigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Importance of Spatial Resolution in the Modeling of Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands

by
Yousef A. Y. Albuhaisi
1,*,
Ype van der Velde
1 and
Sander Houweling
1,2
1
Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2840; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112840
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 1 May 2023 / Accepted: 10 May 2023 / Published: 30 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biogeosciences Remote Sensing)

Abstract

An important uncertainty in the modeling of methane (CH4) emissions from natural wetlands is the wetland area. It is difficult to model wetlands’ CH4 emissions because of several factors, including its spatial heterogeneity on a large range of scales. In this study, we investigate the impact of model resolution on the simulated wetland methane emission for the Fennoscandinavian Peninsula. This is carried out using a high-resolution wetland map (100 × 100 m2) and soil carbon map (250 × 250 m2) in combination with a highly simplified CH4 emission model that is coarsened in five steps from 0.005° to 1°. We find a strong relation between wetland emissions and resolution, which is sensitive, however, to the sub-grid treatment of the wetland fraction. In our setup, soil carbon and soil moisture are positively correlated at a high resolution, with the wetland location leading to increasing CH4 emissions with increasing resolution. Keeping track of the wetland fraction reduces the impact of resolution. However, uncertainties in CH4 emissions remain high because of the large uncertainty in the representation of wetland the area, as demonstrated using the output of the WetChimp intercomparison over our study domain. Because of wetland mapping uncertainties, existing models are unlikely to realistically represent the correlation between soil moisture and soil carbon availability. The correlation is positive in our simplified model but may be different in more complex models depending on their method of representing substrate availability. Therefore, depending on the correlation, CH4 emissions may be over- or underestimated. As increasing the model resolution is an effective approach to mitigate the problem of accounting for the correlation between soil moisture and soil carbon and to improve the accuracy of models, the main message of this study is that increasing the resolution of global wetland models, and especially the input datasets that are used, should receive high priority.
Keywords: methane; soil moisture; soil carbon; land cover map; wetland; resolution dependence methane; soil moisture; soil carbon; land cover map; wetland; resolution dependence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Albuhaisi, Y.A.Y.; van der Velde, Y.; Houweling, S. The Importance of Spatial Resolution in the Modeling of Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112840

AMA Style

Albuhaisi YAY, van der Velde Y, Houweling S. The Importance of Spatial Resolution in the Modeling of Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands. Remote Sensing. 2023; 15(11):2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112840

Chicago/Turabian Style

Albuhaisi, Yousef A. Y., Ype van der Velde, and Sander Houweling. 2023. "The Importance of Spatial Resolution in the Modeling of Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands" Remote Sensing 15, no. 11: 2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112840

APA Style

Albuhaisi, Y. A. Y., van der Velde, Y., & Houweling, S. (2023). The Importance of Spatial Resolution in the Modeling of Methane Emissions from Natural Wetlands. Remote Sensing, 15(11), 2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112840

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop