Next Article in Journal
Developing a New Vegetation Index Using Cyan, Orange, and Near Infrared Bands to Analyze Soybean Growth Dynamics
Next Article in Special Issue
Ecological Water Requirement of Vegetation and Water Stress Assessment in the Middle Reaches of the Keriya River Basin
Previous Article in Journal
Algorithm Fusion for 3D Ground-Penetrating Radar Imaging with Field Examples
Previous Article in Special Issue
MODIS Evapotranspiration Downscaling Using a Deep Neural Network Trained Using Landsat 8 Reflectance and Temperature Data
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Multi-Temporal Remote Sensing Inversion of Evapotranspiration in the Lower Yangtze River Based on Landsat 8 Remote Sensing Data and Analysis of Driving Factors

Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2887; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112887
by Enze Song 1, Xueying Zhu 2, Guangcheng Shao 1,*, Longjia Tian 1, Yuhao Zhou 1, Ao Jiang 3 and Jia Lu 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Remote Sens. 2023, 15(11), 2887; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15112887
Submission received: 24 April 2023 / Revised: 24 May 2023 / Accepted: 31 May 2023 / Published: 1 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Remote Sensing of Terrestrial Evaporation II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Paper is a very interesting and novel work found, great work done by authors. I have accepted the paper for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

For Fig 1, add units on the legend; What kind of monitoring sites? For meteorological data or ET?

For the section of "2.2. Data Acquisition", the measured ET data should be included, and the measured ET is actual ET or potential ET?

Need to explain why LST data was not used.

For Table 1, the remote sensing data obtained is relatively limited, how to obtain monthly ET and annual ET.

For Table 4, will the correlation coefficient be unstable across different years and affect the applicability of the research method?

The year 2020 is not included due to the poor results of the 2020 satellite data, will the stability and reliability of research methods be relatively low?

For Fig 5, RMSE is too small, need to check the calculation process of RMSE; Add units on the coordinate axis.

For Fig 8, the same legend should be used in the figure (same min and max); In the 2019 graph, the water body has values, while in other years' graphs, the water body has no values.

For Fig 12, how to obtain monthly ET and NDVI, because the remote sensing data obtained is relatively limited.

The calculated results (such as annual ET) can be compared with other ET products, such as MOD16 and GLASS ET, the spatial resolution can be different.

Moderate editing of English language required.

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Nice manuscript but I believe some comments need to be addressed before publication.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Ok

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Accept as it is

No

Back to TopTop