Utilizing the Google Earth Engine for Agricultural Drought Conditions and Hazard Assessment Using Drought Indices in the Najd Region, Sultanate of Oman
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Investigated Area
2.2. The Data Used and Processing
2.3. Drought Indices (DIs) Utilization
2.3.1. Temperature Condition Index (TCI)
2.3.2. Vegetation Condition Index (VCI)
2.3.3. Vegetation Health Index (VHI)
2.4. Pearson Correlation Coefficient Analysis (PCA)
2.5. The Drought Hazard Index (DHI) Calculation
2.6. Google Earth Engine (GEE) Tools
2.7. The Study Methodology
3. Results
3.1. Evaluation of Drought Indices
3.1.1. Temperature Condition Index (TCI)
3.1.2. Vegetation Condition Index (VCI)
3.1.3. Vegetation Health Index (VHI)
3.2. Pearson Correlation Coefficient Analysis (PCA) between Drought Indices (DIs)
3.3. The Drought Hazard Index (DHI) Assessment
4. Discussion
- The results of the TCI index values over the study period exhibit variations over time, with notable minimum observed values in specific years (2001, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2021); this indicates periods of more severe temperature conditions in the study area during those years [14]. The TCI index values trend shows an increase in temperature in the years 2014 to 2023 compared to the years 2001 to 2013; this trend suggests a worsening of temperature conditions over the years, which can have implications for the study region’s environment and ecosystems [48]. The TCI mean values throughout different years ranged from 18.9 to 80.9, indicating the varying severity of drought conditions over time. Therefore, the analysis provides valuable insights into the impact of temperature conditions on drought dynamics in the Najd region, emphasizing the importance of considering multiple factors in assessing drought conditions through indices such as TCI and VCI indices [49]. Song et al. (2018) [50] used MODIS-based indices to study drought conditions in China. Their findings highlighted how extreme temperature conditions, reflected by low TCI values, were crucial for understanding drought dynamics and impacts on agriculture. This supports the observation that minimum TCI values signify critical temperature stress periods.
- The spatial distribution maps of the VCI index revealed that several years, including 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, were characterized by mild drought conditions, and the mean VCI values ranged from 48.2 to 67 throughout the study period. This indicates fluctuations in vegetation health and moisture availability in the region over the years. The results suggest a varying pattern of drought severity, with certain years experiencing milder drought conditions while others show wetter conditions. These results provide valuable insights into the dynamics of vegetation response to environmental conditions in the Najd region over the studied time period; the results are similar to the VCI analysis on spatiotemporal variations of spring drought in China by Liang et al. (2021) [51]. Omondi, (2010) [52] employed statistical models to analyze VCI trends in the Horn of Africa, finding that VCI values significantly correlated with seasonal rainfall patterns. Their analysis revealed a mean VCI decrease during drought years, with VCI values dropping by up to 20 compared to non-drought years; the study highlighted those periods with a VCI below 50 corresponded with severe drought conditions and reduced vegetation health.
- According to VHI index spatial distribution maps, all studied years (with the exception of 2005 and 2007) were classified as moderate drought years, and the mean VHI values ranged from 36.6 to 70.5 throughout the study period. Based on Jalayer et al. (2023) [53], the VHI index results underscore the persistent nature of drought conditions in the Najd region, with a noticeable escalation in severe drought events in the latter years of the study period. The spatial and temporal analysis of VHI provides valuable insights into the evolving drought patterns in the region, emphasizing the need for effective mitigation and adaptation strategies to address the heightened risk of drought in the study area [54].
- The high positive correlation between VHI and VCI (0.829, p < 0.01) underscores a robust linear relationship, implying that VCI is a significant predictor of VHI. The correlation coefficient between the VHI index and TCI index is 0.679, indicating a positive correlation. This suggests that as the VHI index increases, the TCI index tends to increase. Meanwhile, the correlation coefficient between the VCI index and TCI index is 0.152, indicating a positive and very weak correlation; this result is compatible with Al-Kindi et al.’s (2022) study [55], which aimed at drought monitoring using various drought indices (DIs) in the northern part of the United Arab Emirates.
- The DHI index’s spatial analysis reveals significant regional disparities in drought severity, highlighting the most severe conditions in the northern regions of the study area, and the spatial distribution maps indicate that the northern regions experienced the highest levels of drought risk, with severity gradually decreasing towards the south and east. Specifically, the data show that approximately 44% of the total area fell under moderate drought risk, while a substantial 56% faced very severe drought risk. The differential in drought severity underscores the importance of understanding regional variations in drought severity and the need for proactive measures to build resilience and mitigate the impacts of drought on vulnerable communities and ecosystems [56].
5. Conclusions and Recommendations
- The TCI index exhibited temporal variations over the study period, with notable minimum values observed in specific years (2001, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2019, 2020, and 2021). Furthermore, there was a discernible trend of increasing temperatures from 2014 to 2023 compared to earlier years, indicating potential climate change impacts.
- Several years, including 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023, were characterized by mild drought conditions based on the VCI index, with mean values ranging from 48.2 to 67 throughout the study period. This suggests periodic but relatively moderate levels of vegetation stress in the region.
- Except for 2005 and 2007, all studied years were classified as moderate drought years based on the VHI index, indicating persistent drought conditions in the region. A noticeable escalation in severe drought events was observed towards the latter years of the study period, emphasizing the evolving nature of drought patterns and the need for effective mitigation and adaptation strategies.
- A strong positive correlation was found between VHI and VCI indices, indicating a robust linear relationship and highlighting VCI as a significant predictor of VHI. Positive correlations were also observed between VHI and TCI indices, albeit with varying strengths, while the correlation between VCI and TCI indices was positive but very weak.
- The northern regions of the study area faced the most severe drought hazards, gradually diminishing towards the south and east. Approximately 44% of the total area was classified as under moderate drought risk, while the remaining 56% faced very severe drought risk, underscoring the widespread and significant impacts of drought in the study area.
- Ground Validation and Local Accuracy:
- (a)
- Increase the number and coverage of ground-based monitoring stations, especially in remote and arid regions. Collaborative networks between local governments, research institutions, and international organizations can help achieve these goals.
- (b)
- Leverage local knowledge and observations from communities to validate satellite data and improve local accuracy.
- Expertise and Interpretation:
- (a)
- Provide training for local experts and stakeholders in remote sensing and climate science to improve the interpretation of satellite data.
- (b)
- Develop more intuitive tools and platforms that can assist non-experts in interpreting satellite-derived indices.
- Historical Data Limitations:
- (a)
- Combine satellite data with other historical datasets, such as meteorological records or historical maps, to extend the temporal analysis.
- (b)
- Use climate models to simulate past conditions and fill gaps in the historical record.
- Resolution and Fine-Scale Variations:
- (a)
- Where possible, use higher-resolution satellite data or combine multiple data sources to capture finer-scale variations.
- (b)
- Apply statistical and machine learning techniques to downscale coarse-resolution data to better reflect local conditions.
- Access to Data and Resources:
- (a)
- Foster partnerships between researchers, governments, and organizations to share resources and expertise.
- (b)
- Support and utilize open access platforms and initiatives like Google Earth Engine (GEE) to facilitate data access and processing.
- Socio-Economic Impact Assessment:
- (a)
- Combine satellite data with socio-economic data through integrated assessment models to capture the broader impacts of drought.
- (b)
- Engage with local communities to understand and incorporate their experiences and impacts into drought assessments.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- El Kenawy, A.M.; Al Buloshi, A.; Al-Awadhi, T.; Al Nasiri, N.; Navarro-Serrano, F.; Alhatrushi, S.; Robaa, S.; Domínguez-Castro, F.; McCabe, M.F.; Schuwerack, P.-M. Evidence for intensification of meteorological droughts in Oman over the past four decades. Atmos. Res. 2020, 246, 105126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sayers, P.; Yuanyuan, L.; Moncrieff, C.; Jianqiang, L.; Tickner, D.; Xiangyu, X.; Speed, R.; Aihua, L.; Gang, L.; Bing, Q. Drought risk Management: A Strategic Approach; United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2016; ISBN 978-92-3-1000942. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, M.; Huang, S.; Huang, Q.; Wang, H.; Leng, G.; Xie, Y. Assessing socio-economic drought evolution characteristics and their possible meteorological driving force. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2019, 10, 1084–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rembold, F.; Meroni, M.; Atzberger, C.; Ham, F.; Fillol, E.; Thenkabail, P. Agricultural drought monitoring using space-derived vegetation and biophysical products: A global perspective. Remote Sens. Handb. 2016, 3, 349–365. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, A.J.; Verdon-Kidd, D.C.; Hancock, G.R.; Willgoose, G. Catchment-scale drought: Capturing the whole drought cycle using multiple indicators. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2020, 24, 1985–2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Wu, X.; Hao, Y.; Wu, C.; Zhang, J. Is Southwest China drying or wetting? Spatiotemporal patterns and potential causes. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2020, 139, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xia, J.; Yang, F.; She, D.; Zou, L.; Hong, S.; Wang, Q.; Yuan, F.; Song, L. Analysis of drought characteristic of Sichuan province, Southwestern China. Water 2023, 15, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sara Tokhi, A. Yield Assessment of Grapes in Drought Prone Areas Using Satellite Remote Sensing-Based Time-Series Datasets and Machine Learning Approach. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduated School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Alahacoon, N.; Edirisinghe, M. A comprehensive assessment of remote sensing and traditional based drought monitoring indices at global and regional scale. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2022, 13, 762–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansour, S. Geospatial modelling of drought patterns in Oman: GIS-based and machine learning approach. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2024, 10, 3411–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorentino, C.; D’Antonio, P.; Toscano, F.; Donvito, A.; Modugno, F. New Technique for Monitoring High Nature Value Farmland (HNVF) in Basilicata. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belal, A.-A.; El-Ramady, H.R.; Mohamed, E.S.; Saleh, A.M. Drought risk assessment using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Arab. J. Geosci. 2014, 7, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, H.; Quinn, N.; Horswell, M. Remote sensing for drought monitoring & impact assessment: Progress, past challenges and future opportunities. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 232, 111291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhou, L.; Xie, B.; Zhou, J.; Li, C. Comparative evaluation of drought indices for monitoring drought based on remote sensing data. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 20408–20425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hedayat, H.; Kaboli, H.S. Drought risk assessment: The importance of vulnerability factors interdependencies in regional drought risk management. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024, 100, 104152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, B.; Lü, A.; Wu, J.; Zhao, L.; Liu, M. Drought hazard assessment and spatial characteristics analysis in China. J. Geogr. Sci. 2011, 21, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amani, M.; Ghorbanian, A.; Ahmadi, S.A.; Kakooei, M.; Moghimi, A.; Mirmazloumi, S.M.; Moghaddam, S.H.A.; Mahdavi, S.; Ghahremanloo, M.; Parsian, S. Google earth engine cloud computing platform for remote sensing big data applications: A comprehensive review. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2020, 13, 5326–5350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waleed, M.; Sajjad, M. On the emergence of geospatial cloud-based platforms for disaster risk management: A global scientometric review of Google Earth engine applications. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023, 97, 104056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aksoy, S.; Gorucu, O.; Sertel, E. Drought monitoring using MODIS derived indices and google earth engine platform. In Proceedings of the 2019 8th International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics), Istanbul, Turkey, 16–19 July 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, R.; Gilani, H. Global drought monitoring with big geospatial datasets using Google Earth Engine. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 17244–17264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ejaz, N.; Bahrawi, J.; Alghamdi, K.M.; Rahman, K.U.; Shang, S. Drought monitoring using landsat derived indices and Google Earth engine platform: A case study from Al-Lith Watershed, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sazib, N.; Mladenova, I.; Bolten, J. Leveraging the Google Earth Engine for drought assessment using global soil moisture data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hashmi, H. Land Degradation in the Sultanate of Oman: Reasons and Intervention Measures. In Combating Desertification in Asia, Africa and the Middle East: Proven Practices; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 401–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, J.P.; Zazzaro, C. The Farasan Islands, Saudi Arabia: Towards a chronology of settlement. Arab. Archaeol. Epigr. 2014, 25, 147–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, H.E.; Zimmermann, N.E.; McVicar, T.R.; Vergopolan, N.; Berg, A.; Wood, E.F. Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 180214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Mashaikhi, K. Evaluation of Groundwater Recharge in Najd Aquifers Using Hydraulics, Hydrochemical, and Isotope Evidences. Ph.D. Thesis, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, J.; Mu, Q.; Huang, J. Assessing the remotely sensed Drought Severity Index for agricultural drought monitoring and impact analysis in North China. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 63, 296–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schaaf, C.B.; Gao, F.; Strahler, A.H.; Lucht, W.; Li, X.; Tsang, T.; Strugnell, N.C.; Zhang, X.; Jin, Y.; Muller, J.-P.; et al. First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002, 83, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucker, C.J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 1979, 8, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, L.; Tian, Q.; Yu, T.; Meng, Q.; Jancso, T.; Udvardy, P.; Huang, Y. A comprehensive drought monitoring method integrating MODIS and TRMM data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2013, 23, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogan, F.N. Application of vegetation index and brightness temperature for drought detection. Adv. Space Res. 1995, 15, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogan, F.N. Global drought watch from space. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 1997, 78, 621–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yagci, A.L.; Di, L.; Deng, M. The effect of corn–soybean rotation on the NDVI-based drought indicators: A case study in Iowa, USA, using Vegetation Condition Index. GIScience Remote Sens. 2015, 52, 290–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gidey, E.; Dikinya, O.; Sebego, R.; Segosebe, E.; Zenebe, A. Analysis of the long-term agricultural drought onset, cessation, duration, frequency, severity and spatial extent using Vegetation Health Index (VHI) in Raya and its environs, Northern Ethiopia. Environ. Syst. Res. 2018, 7, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilhelmi, O.V.; Wilhite, D.A. Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: A Nebraska case study. Nat. Hazards 2002, 25, 37–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKee, T.B.; Doesken, N.J.; Kleist, J. The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, Anaheim, CA, USA, 17–22 January 1993; pp. 179–183. [Google Scholar]
- Sönmez, F.K.; Kömüscü, A.Ü.; Erkan, A.; Turgu, E. An analysis of spatial and temporal dimension of drought vulnerability in Turkey using the standardized precipitation index. Nat. Hazards 2005, 35, 243–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorelick, N.; Hancher, M.; Dixon, M.; Ilyushchenko, S.; Thau, D.; Moore, R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 2017, 202, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azadi, H.; Keramati, P.; Taheri, F.; Rafiaani, P.; Teklemariam, D.; Gebrehiwot, K.; Hosseininia, G.; Van Passel, S.; Lebailly, P.; Witlox, F. Agricultural land conversion: Reviewing drought impacts and coping strategies. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018, 31, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; He, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Yang, W.; Yao, S.; Sun, Q. Spatiotemporal characteristics of drought and its impact on vegetation in the vegetation region of Northwest China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 133, 108420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsafadi, K.; Al-Ansari, N.; Mokhtar, A.; Mohammed, S.; Elbeltagi, A.; Sh Sammen, S.; Bi, S. An evapotranspiration deficit-based drought index to detect variability of terrestrial carbon productivity in the Middle East. Environ. Res. Lett. 2022, 17, 014051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.; Xia, H.; Pan, L.; Song, H.; Niu, W.; Wang, R.; Li, R.; Bian, X.; Guo, Y.; Qin, Y. Drought monitoring over Yellow River basin from 2003–2019 using reconstructed MODIS land surface temperature in Google Earth Engine. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemzadeh Ghalhari, M.; Vafakhah, M.; Damavandi, A.A. Agricultural drought assessment using vegetation indices derived from MODIS time series in Tehran Province. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022, 15, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boluwade, A. Spatial-temporal assessment of satellite-based rainfall estimates in different precipitation regimes in water-scarce and data-sparse regions. Atmosphere 2020, 11, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gyaneshwar, A.; Mishra, A.; Chadha, U.; Raj Vincent, P.D.; Rajinikanth, V.; Pattukandan Ganapathy, G.; Srinivasan, K. A contemporary review on deep learning models for drought prediction. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Qu, J.J.; Hao, X. Agricultural drought monitoring using MODIS-based drought indices over the USA Corn Belt. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2015, 36, 5403–5425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, H.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, J. Monitoring drought using composite drought indices based on remote sensing. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 711, 134585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhuo, W.; Huang, J.; Zhang, X.; Sun, H.; Zhu, D.; Su, W.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z. Comparison of five drought indices for agricultural drought monitoring and impacts on winter wheat yields analysis. In Proceedings of the 2016 Fifth International Conference on Agro-Geoinformatics (Agro-Geoinformatics), Tianjin, China, 18–20 July 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Fang, S.; Yang, Z.; Shen, S. Drought indices based on MODIS data compared over a maize-growing season in Songliao Plain, China. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2018, 12, 046003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, L.; Qiu, S.; Yan, J.; Shi, Y.; Geng, D. VCI-based analysis on spatiotemporal variations of spring drought in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Omondi, P. Agricultural drought indices in the greater horn of Africa (GHA) countries. In Proceedings of the Agricultural Drought Indices Proceedings of an Expert Meeting, Murcia, Spain, 2–4 June 2010; p. 128. [Google Scholar]
- Jalayer, S.; Sharifi, A.; Abbasi-Moghadam, D.; Tariq, A.; Qin, S. Assessment of spatiotemporal characteristic of droughts using in situ and remote sensing-based drought indices. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2023, 16, 1483–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Chu, H.-J. Spatiotemporal consistency and inconsistency of meteorological and agricultural drought identification: A case study of India. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 2024, 33, 101134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kindi, H.; Al-Ruzouq, R.; Hammouri, N.; Shanableh, A. Monitoring Drought with Various Indices in Northern Part of UAE Using Different Satellite Image. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2022–2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 17–22 July 2022; pp. 2339–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nasrollahi, M.; Khosravi, H.; Moghaddamnia, A.; Malekian, A.; Shahid, S. Assessment of drought risk index using drought hazard and vulnerability indices. Arab. J. Geosci. 2018, 11, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
TCI/VCI/VHI Values | Drought Class |
---|---|
0 to 10 | Extreme drought |
10 to 20 | Severe drought |
20 to 30 | Moderate drought |
30 to 40 | Mild drought |
More than 40 | No drought |
Severity | Weight | Occurrence Probability (%) | Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Near-normal drought | 1 | ≥67.49 | 1 |
67.49–68.67 | 2 | ||
68.67–69.71 | 3 | ||
≤69.71 | 4 | ||
Moderate drought | 2 | ≥8.14 | 1 |
8.14–8.21 | 2 | ||
8.21–8.27 | 3 | ||
≤8.27 | 4 | ||
Severe drought | 3 | ≥3.36 | 1 |
3.36–3.99 | 2 | ||
3.99–4.47 | 3 | ||
≤4.47 | 4 | ||
Very severe drought | 4 | ≥1.92 | 1 |
1.92–2.24 | 2 | ||
2.24–2.59 | 3 | ||
≤2.59 | 4 |
Correlation Coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|
Average TCI | Average VCI | Average VHI | |
Average TCI | 1 | 0.152 | 0.679 ** |
Average VCI | 0.152 | 1 | 0.829 ** |
Average VHI | 0.679 ** | 0.829 ** | 1 |
Drought Severity | Weight | Occurrence Probability (%) | Area (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Near-normal drought | 1 | ≤69.71 | 21 |
Moderate drought | 2 | ≤8.27 | 23 |
Very severe drought | 4 | ≤2.59 | 56 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Al Nadabi, M.S.; D’Antonio, P.; Fiorentino, C.; Scopa, A.; Shams, E.M.; Fadl, M.E. Utilizing the Google Earth Engine for Agricultural Drought Conditions and Hazard Assessment Using Drought Indices in the Najd Region, Sultanate of Oman. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162960
Al Nadabi MS, D’Antonio P, Fiorentino C, Scopa A, Shams EM, Fadl ME. Utilizing the Google Earth Engine for Agricultural Drought Conditions and Hazard Assessment Using Drought Indices in the Najd Region, Sultanate of Oman. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(16):2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162960
Chicago/Turabian StyleAl Nadabi, Mohammed S., Paola D’Antonio, Costanza Fiorentino, Antonio Scopa, Eltaher M. Shams, and Mohamed E. Fadl. 2024. "Utilizing the Google Earth Engine for Agricultural Drought Conditions and Hazard Assessment Using Drought Indices in the Najd Region, Sultanate of Oman" Remote Sensing 16, no. 16: 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162960
APA StyleAl Nadabi, M. S., D’Antonio, P., Fiorentino, C., Scopa, A., Shams, E. M., & Fadl, M. E. (2024). Utilizing the Google Earth Engine for Agricultural Drought Conditions and Hazard Assessment Using Drought Indices in the Najd Region, Sultanate of Oman. Remote Sensing, 16(16), 2960. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16162960