Previous Article in Journal
A Space–Time Coding Array Sidelobe Optimization Method Combining Array Element Spatial Coding and Mismatched Filtering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reduction of Subsidence and Large-Scale Rebound in the Beijing Plain after Anthropogenic Water Transfer and Ecological Recharge of Groundwater: Evidence from Long Time-Series Satellites InSAR
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Interferometric Radars for Bridge Monitoring: Comparison among X-Bands, Ku-Bands, and W-Bands

Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(17), 3323; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173323 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 25 July 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 6 September 2024 / Published: 7 September 2024

Abstract

Interferometric radars are widely used sensors for structural health monitoring. They are able to perform dynamic measurements of displacement with sub-millimeter precision. Today, the Ku-band is the most common, due to the spread of commercial systems operating in this band. At the same time, the W-band sensors are gaining ever more interest. Other popular systems work in the X-band. Since the characteristics of the measurements dramatically depend on the operative frequency, it is essential to highlight their differences. For instance, higher frequency allows for high displacement resolution, but it is more subject to phase wrapping and decorrelation effects. In this paper, a direct comparison between radars operating in X, Ku, and W-band for bridge monitoring is carried out. The radars provide frequency-modulated continuous-wave signals. Experimental campaigns were performed both in controlled and realistic scenarios (a stayed bridge). The results of the experiments demonstrate that all the three sensors are suitable for performing dynamic structure monitoring despite their differences. It is worth noting that this comparative analysis has highlighted the role of amplitude variation in phase/displacement measurement. Regarding this point, the three different bands exhibit significant differences.
Keywords: infrastructure stability monitoring; bridge monitoring; ground-based radars; radar interferometry infrastructure stability monitoring; bridge monitoring; ground-based radars; radar interferometry

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Beni, A.; Miccinesi, L.; Pagnini, L.; Cioncolini, A.; Shan, J.; Pieraccini, M. Interferometric Radars for Bridge Monitoring: Comparison among X-Bands, Ku-Bands, and W-Bands. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173323

AMA Style

Beni A, Miccinesi L, Pagnini L, Cioncolini A, Shan J, Pieraccini M. Interferometric Radars for Bridge Monitoring: Comparison among X-Bands, Ku-Bands, and W-Bands. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(17):3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Beni, Alessandra, Lapo Miccinesi, Lorenzo Pagnini, Andrea Cioncolini, Jingfeng Shan, and Massimiliano Pieraccini. 2024. "Interferometric Radars for Bridge Monitoring: Comparison among X-Bands, Ku-Bands, and W-Bands" Remote Sensing 16, no. 17: 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop