Next Article in Journal
Coastal Storm-Induced Sinkholes: Insights from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Blue Band Vegetation Index (the Re-Modified Anthocyanin Reflectance Index (RMARI)) for Accurate Farmland Shelterbelt Extraction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparison and Optimization of Light Use Efficiency-Based Gross Primary Productivity Models in an Agroforestry Orchard

by
Ningbo Cui
1,†,
Ziling He
1,†,
Mingjun Wang
1,
Wenjiang Zhang
1,
Lu Zhao
1,
Daozhi Gong
2,
Jun Li
1 and
Shouzheng Jiang
1,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering & College of Water Resource and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2
State Engineering Laboratory of Efficient Water Use of Crops and Disaster Loss Mitigation, Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science, Beijing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(19), 3679; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193679
Submission received: 14 August 2024 / Revised: 28 September 2024 / Accepted: 29 September 2024 / Published: 2 October 2024

Abstract

The light-use efficiency-based gross primary productivity (LUE-GPP) model is widely utilized for simulating terrestrial ecosystem carbon exchanges owing to its perceived simplicity and reliability. Variations in cloud cover and aerosol concentrations can affect ecosystem LUE, thereby influencing the performance of the LUE-GPP model, particularly in humid regions. In this study, the performance of six big-leaf LUE-GPP models and one two-leaf LUE-GPP model were evaluated in a humid agroforestry ecosystem from 2018–2020. All big-leaf LUE-GPP models yielded GPP values consistent with that derived from the eddy covariance system (GPPEC), with R2 ranging from 0.66–0.73 and RMSE ranging from 1.81–3.04 g C m−2 d−1. Differences in model performance were attributed to the differences in the quantification of temperature (Ts) and moisture constraints (Ws) and their combination forms in the models. The Ts and Ws algorithms in the eddy covariance-light-use efficiency (EF-LUE) model well characterized the environmental constraints on LUE. Simulation accuracy under the common limitation of Ts and Ws (Ts × Ws) was higher than the maximum limitation of Ts or Ws (Min (Ts, Ws)), and the combination of the Ts algorithm in the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) and the Ws algorithm in the EF-LUE model was optimized in combination forms, thereby constraining LUE for GPP estimates (GPPBLO, R2 = 0.76). Various big-leaf LUE-GPP models overestimated or underestimated GPP on sunny or cloudy days, respectively, while the two-leaf LUE-GPP model, which considered the transmission of diffuse radiation and the difference in photosynthetic capacity of canopy leaves, performed well (R2 = 0.72, p < 0.01). Nevertheless, the underestimation/overestimation for shaded/sunlit leaves remained under different weather conditions. Then, the clearness index (Kt) was introduced to calculate the dynamic LUE in the big-leaf and two-leaf LUE-GPP models in the form of exponential or power functions, resulting in consistent performance even in different weather conditions and an overall higher simulation accuracy. This study confirmed the potential applicability of different LUE-GPP models and emphasized the importance of dynamic LUE on model performance.
Keywords: big-leaf model; two-leaf model; environmental constraints; clearness index big-leaf model; two-leaf model; environmental constraints; clearness index

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cui, N.; He, Z.; Wang, M.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, L.; Gong, D.; Li, J.; Jiang, S. Comparison and Optimization of Light Use Efficiency-Based Gross Primary Productivity Models in an Agroforestry Orchard. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3679. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193679

AMA Style

Cui N, He Z, Wang M, Zhang W, Zhao L, Gong D, Li J, Jiang S. Comparison and Optimization of Light Use Efficiency-Based Gross Primary Productivity Models in an Agroforestry Orchard. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(19):3679. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193679

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cui, Ningbo, Ziling He, Mingjun Wang, Wenjiang Zhang, Lu Zhao, Daozhi Gong, Jun Li, and Shouzheng Jiang. 2024. "Comparison and Optimization of Light Use Efficiency-Based Gross Primary Productivity Models in an Agroforestry Orchard" Remote Sensing 16, no. 19: 3679. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193679

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop