Next Article in Journal
A Six-Year (2014–2020) Statistical Correlation Study of VLF Terminator Time Shift with Earthquakes in Japan
Previous Article in Journal
The Implications of Plantation Forest-Driven Land Use/Land Cover Changes for Ecosystem Service Values in the Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management: Comparing Tools and Emphasizing the Importance of In-Situ Data

1
Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
2
Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, 32540 S. Biosphere Rd, Oracle, AZ 85623, USA
3
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Durham, NH 03824, USA
4
Environmental Sciences Initiative, CUNY Advanced Science Research Center, New York, NY 10031, USA
5
Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA
6
Institute for Sustainable Cities, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA
7
Programs in Biology and Earth and Environmental Sciences, CUNY Graduate, New York, NY 10031, USA
8
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2024, 16(22), 4161; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224161
Submission received: 10 September 2024 / Revised: 28 October 2024 / Accepted: 6 November 2024 / Published: 8 November 2024

Abstract

Remote sensing (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GISs) provide significant opportunities for monitoring and managing natural resources across various temporal, spectral, and spatial resolutions. There is a critical need for natural resource managers to understand the expanding capabilities of image sources, analysis techniques, and in situ validation methods. This article reviews key image analysis tools in natural resource management, highlighting their unique strengths across diverse applications such as agriculture, forestry, water resources, soil management, and natural hazard monitoring. Google Earth Engine (GEE), a cloud-based platform introduced in 2010, stands out for its vast geospatial data catalog and scalability, making it ideal for global-scale analysis and algorithm development. ENVI, known for advanced multi- and hyperspectral image processing, excels in vegetation monitoring, environmental analysis, and feature extraction. ERDAS IMAGINE specializes in radar data analysis and LiDAR processing, offering robust classification and terrain analysis capabilities. Global Mapper is recognized for its versatility, supporting over 300 data formats and excelling in 3D visualization and point cloud processing, especially in UAV applications. eCognition leverages object-based image analysis (OBIA) to enhance classification accuracy by grouping pixels into meaningful objects, making it effective in environmental monitoring and urban planning. Lastly, QGIS integrates these remote sensing tools with powerful spatial analysis functions, supporting decision-making in sustainable resource management. Together, these tools when paired with in situ data provide comprehensive solutions for managing and analyzing natural resources across scales.
Keywords: remote sensing; artificial intelligence; neural network; machine learning; in situ validation remote sensing; artificial intelligence; neural network; machine learning; in situ validation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharma, S.; Beslity, J.O.; Rustad, L.; Shelby, L.J.; Manos, P.T.; Khanal, P.; Reinmann, A.B.; Khanal, C. Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management: Comparing Tools and Emphasizing the Importance of In-Situ Data. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224161

AMA Style

Sharma S, Beslity JO, Rustad L, Shelby LJ, Manos PT, Khanal P, Reinmann AB, Khanal C. Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management: Comparing Tools and Emphasizing the Importance of In-Situ Data. Remote Sensing. 2024; 16(22):4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224161

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharma, Sanjeev, Justin O. Beslity, Lindsey Rustad, Lacy J. Shelby, Peter T. Manos, Puskar Khanal, Andrew B. Reinmann, and Churamani Khanal. 2024. "Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management: Comparing Tools and Emphasizing the Importance of In-Situ Data" Remote Sensing 16, no. 22: 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224161

APA Style

Sharma, S., Beslity, J. O., Rustad, L., Shelby, L. J., Manos, P. T., Khanal, P., Reinmann, A. B., & Khanal, C. (2024). Remote Sensing and GIS in Natural Resource Management: Comparing Tools and Emphasizing the Importance of In-Situ Data. Remote Sensing, 16(22), 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16224161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop