Next Article in Journal
Improving Finite Element Optimization of InSAR-Derived Deformation Source Using Integrated Multiscale Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Long-Term Photovoltaic (PV) Power Potential in China Based on High-Quality Solar Radiation and Optimal Tilt Angles of PV Panels
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Review of City-Scale Methane Flux Inversion Based on Top-Down Methods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Emission Control and Sensitivity Regime Shifts Drive the Decline in Extreme Ozone Concentration in the Sichuan Basin During 2015–2024

1
Key Laboratory of Core Tech on Numerical Model-AI Integrated Forecast for Hazardous Precipitation, Chongqing Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Chongqing 401147, China
2
Key Laboratory for Aerosol-Cloud-Precipitation of China Meteorological Administration, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
3
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disaster, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
4
Chongqing Meteorological Observatory, Chongqing 401147, China
5
Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210042, China
6
Shapingba Meteorological Bureau, Chongqing 400030, China
7
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2025, 17(18), 3238; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183238
Submission received: 20 July 2025 / Revised: 11 September 2025 / Accepted: 14 September 2025 / Published: 19 September 2025

Abstract

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • O3 pollution in the SCB became more widespread but less intense.
  • Shift from VOC-limited to NOx-limited O3 formation regimes observed across the SCB.
What is the implication of the main finding?
  • Reduced NOx emissions contributed to lower extreme O3 levels.

Abstract

In recent years, ozone (O3) pollution has become a prominent air quality concern in the Sichuan Basin (SCB). Based on surface O3 measurements from 22 cities between 2015 and 2024, this study investigates the evolution of extreme O3 pollution events and their underlying causes. While the average O3 concentration, the number of affected cities, and the total O3 pollution hours have all increased during the past decade, extreme O3 concentrations have shown a significant decline since 2020. These trends suggest that O3 pollution in the SCB has become more spatially extensive and less intense. Decomposition analysis attributed ~75% of the post-2020 decline in extreme O3 concentrations to precursor emission reductions, with meteorological variability explaining the remaining ~25%. Satellite observations of formaldehyde (HCHO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) column densities indicate a regional shift in O3 formation regimes across the SCB, with many areas transitioning from VOC (volatile organic compound)-limited to transitional or NOx (nitrogen oxide)-limited conditions. This shift likely contributed to the broader spatial extent and longer duration of O3 pollution in recent years. Model sensitivity simulations and Integrated Reaction Rate (IRR) analysis demonstrate that reductions in precursor emissions, particularly NOx, directly weakened daytime photochemical O3 production and disrupted NOx-driven radical propagation under transition and NOx-limited conditions, collectively driving the observed decline in extreme O3 concentrations.

1. Introduction

As a ground-level atmospheric pollutant, elevated concentrations of ozone (O3) can have harmful effects on human health, crop growth, ecosystems, and economic development [1,2,3]. Since the implementation of the Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control in 2013, China’s air quality has significantly improved, particularly with a sustained decline in particulate matter pollution [4,5,6]. However, in many regions, O3 pollution has shown a marked upward trend, particularly before 2019 [7,8,9,10]. The implementation of the Three-Year Action Plan to Win the Battle for a Blue Sky (2018–2020) resulted in continued reductions in O3 precursors, contributing positively to the mitigation of O3 pollution in China [10,11].
The formation of ground-level ozone involves complex photochemical reactions between nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which compete for reactions with hydroxyl radicals (OH) [12,13]. Ozone production depends on the relative abundance of NOx and VOCs, categorized into three regimes: NOx-limited, VOC-limited, and transitional [14]. In the NOx-limited regime, where the VOC-to-NOx ratio is high, OH mainly reacts with VOCs, and reducing NOx emissions decreases O3 levels. In the VOC-limited regime, with a low VOC-to-NOx ratio, the OH + NO2 reaction dominates, and reducing NOx emissions may paradoxically increase O3 concentrations. The transitional regime occurs between these extremes, where ozone production is equally sensitive to both species, and the reaction rates of OH with VOCs and NO2 are balanced at a specific VOC:NO2 ratio, at which the maximum amount of ozone is produced. However, this ratio depends on the particular VOC or VOC mixture, as the reaction rate constants for OH with each VOC differ [12].
Therefore, trends in ozone concentrations are largely influenced by changes in the emissions of its precursors. From 2013 to 2017, the decline in NOx and PM2.5 emissions was responsible for the O3 increases in China due to VOC-limited regimes in most urban areas [7,11,15]. Since 2018, the synergistic control of VOCs and NOx has initially worked to mitigate O3 pollution [11]. In the future, mutual reduction in VOCs and NOx emissions may be an effective strategy for improving O3 air quality. Furthermore, meteorological conditions play a significant role in the long-term variations in O3, particularly after 2017, when the contribution of meteorological factors to O3 has significantly increased [7,16].
The Sichuan Basin (SCB), one of the most densely populated and industrially developed regions in China, has been experiencing increasingly severe O3 pollution [11,15]. Bounded by the Tibetan Plateau to the west, the Qinling and Loess Plateaus to the north, the Wu Mountains to the east, and the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau to the south, the SCB is geographically enclosed, which limits the transport of anthropogenic pollutants from surrounding regions [17,18,19]. This unique topographical setting provides an ideal situation for examining the impacts of local anthropogenic emissions on O3 pollution.
Recent studies have characterized O3 dynamics in the SCB using observational, satellite, and modeling analyses. Wu et al. [15] documented a sustained O3 increase during 2013–2020, driven by precursor emissions and meteorological variability, highlighting the basin’s sensitivity to synoptic patterns and thermal conditions. Similarly, Wang et al. [20] linked rising O3 in Chengdu to evolving NO2 and HCHO columns, while Ren et al. [21] quantified heterogeneous O3 responses across the Chengdu–Chongqing urban agglomeration, attributing NO2 declines to emission controls. At broader scales, Wang et al. [22] identified amplified O3 burdens during heatwaves, synergistically enhanced by biogenic VOCs in the SCB’s topographically enclosed environment. Complementary regime analyses [7] further emphasized the prevalence of VOC-limited conditions in the SCB, with seasonal transitions toward NOx-limited regimes. However, most of these studies mainly focused on long-term trends up to 2020, while the evolution of O3 after 2020, especially the changes in extreme O3 events, remains poorly understood. In particular, the impacts of recent emission reductions on O3 formation regimes during extreme episodes have rarely been explored. To address these gaps, this study integrates ground-level O3 observations, satellite-derived formaldehyde (HCHO) and NO2 data, and model simulations to investigate the evolution of O3 pollution and its formation regimes in the SCB from 2015 to 2024, as well as the role of anthropogenic emission changes in driving extreme O3 events.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ozone Observation Data

Since 2013, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) of China has established air quality monitoring stations across cities nationwide. By January 2015, the air quality monitoring network covered all 22 cities in the Sichuan Basin. This study collected hourly O3 data from 156 stations in these cities between 1 January 2015, and 31 December 2024. According to China’s technical regulation on ambient air quality standards [23], air quality is classified as pollution if the hourly average O3 concentration exceeds 200 μg m−3 or the 8-h moving average O3 exceeds 160 μg m−3. Note that O3 concentrations reported by the China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) were in units of μg m−3 under standard state (273 K, 1013.25 hPa) prior to September 2018, but were changed to reference state (298.15 K, 1013.25 hPa) thereafter [23,24]. To ensure data consistency from 2015 to 2024, O3 concentrations after September 2018 were converted to standard state conditions.
The conversion between the two states follows the ideal gas law (PV = nRT), where gas mass concentration is expressed as
C = P M R T
where P denotes atmospheric pressure, M represents the molar mass of the air, R is the universal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. For the standard (std) and reference (ref) states, the ratio of O3 concentrations becomes
C s t d C r e f = P s t d P r e f · T r e f T s t d
Given constant atmospheric pressure (1013.25 hPa), the partial pressure of O3 remains unchanged (i.e., Pstd = Pref). Tref and Tstd are 298.15 K and 273 K, respectively. As a result,
C s t d = C r e f · T r e f T s t d = C r e f · 1.092
To study extreme ozone pollution events in the SCB, hourly O3 concentration data were used to extract exceedance instances (hourly O3 concentration exceeded 200 μg m−3) in all cities from 2015 to 2024. The hourly standard was chosen rather than the 8-h moving average standard because the hourly threshold is more difficult to reach and thus better reflects extreme O3 pollution. The total duration of pollution using the hourly standard is only about one-third of that based on the 8-h standard.

2.2. Satellite HCHO and NO2 Data

The ratio of HCHO to NO2 column concentrations (referred to as FNR) derived from satellite observations is commonly used to identify ozone formation sensitivity regimes [20,21,25,26]. This study investigates the temporal evolution and spatial distribution of these regimes over the SCB, based on HCHO and NO2 data from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) and TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) for the period 2015–2024.
OMI operates in a sun-synchronous polar orbit and crosses the equator at approximately 13:40 local time each day, providing global daily observations of trace gases with a nadir spatial resolution of approximately 13 km × 24 km [27]. TROPOMI is a nadir-viewing spectrometer designed for atmospheric composition monitoring [28]. Operating in a sun-synchronous orbit with a local overpass time of approximately 13:30, it collects daily global observations across four spectral ranges: ultraviolet, visible, near-infrared, and shortwave infrared. TROPOMI features high spectral and spatial resolution, with typical ground pixel sizes around 7.2 km × 3.6 km (improved to 5.6 km in the along-track direction since August 2019), and a wide swath of about 2600 km. This configuration enables near-complete global coverage on a daily basis, with enhanced sensitivity and accuracy compared to previous satellite instruments [29].
The OMI HCHO data are based on the OMHCHOd product, which offers quality-controlled, gridded vertical column densities at 0.1° × 0.1° resolution. Retrievals influenced by high solar zenith angles, elevated cloud fractions, or instrumental anomalies, such as the row anomaly, are excluded to ensure data quality. The HCHO dataset used in this study covers the period from January 2015 to June 2022 [30]. The TROPOMI HCHO data are obtained from the daily Level 3 product with the same spatial resolution of 0.1° × 0.1°. The dataset is processed using advanced retrieval algorithms developed under the German Aerospace Center (DLR) InPULS project, with strict quality filtering applied to exclude scenes with unfavorable observational conditions, such as high cloud cover or low signal quality. The dataset used in this study spans the period from May 2018 to December 2024. To ensure consistency and continuity between the OMI and TROPOMI HCHO datasets, monthly grid-based adjustment factors were applied to the earlier OMI data (January 2015 to April 2018). These factors were calculated as the ratio of monthly mean TROPOMI HCHO to monthly mean OMI HCHO within each grid cell during their overlapping period (May 2018 to June 2022).
The OMI NO2 data are obtained from the QA4ECV product, which applies an improved retrieval algorithm incorporating enhanced spectral fitting techniques and a data assimilation-based stratospheric background estimation. These improvements enhance the separation of stratospheric and tropospheric components and refine air mass factor calculations [31]. In this study, QA4ECV NO2 data from January 2015 to March 2021 were used, and regridded to 0.125° × 0.125° spatial resolution after applying standard quality screening. The TROPOMI NO2 data are based on the latest version 2.8.0 of the operational product, which includes updates to the cloud algorithm, surface elevation processing, and quality assurance filtering [32]. These enhancements contribute to more accurate retrievals, particularly over snow-covered, cloud-free regions. In this study, TROPOMI NO2 data from February 2018 to December 2024 were used. The original data were also regridded to a spatial resolution of 0.125° × 0.125° following standard quality control procedures. To further harmonize the two datasets, monthly adjustment factors were also applied to the earlier OMI NO2 data (January 2015 to January 2018), following the same approach as for HCHO. These factors were computed as the ratio of monthly mean TROPOMI to monthly mean OMI NO2 concentrations within each grid cell during their overlapping period (February 2018 to March 2021).
To quantify the uncertainty introduced by the harmonization, OMI and TROPOMI data over the Sichuan Basin during the overlapping period were compared (Figure S1). For HCHO, the unadjusted OMI data showed a weak correlation with TROPOMI (R = 0.39) and a strong negative normalized mean bias (NMB = −38%). After adjustment, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.55, the bias was largely removed (NMB = −5%), and the root mean square error (RMSE) decreased. The mean adjustment factor during the overlap period was 1.58, and as shown in Figure S2a, the adjustment effectively eliminates the offset between the two products and ensures continuity in the long-term HCHO record. For NO2, the correlation improved from 0.51 to 0.78, while the bias decreased from 15.4% to 3.7%. The mean adjustment factor was 0.89, and Figure S2b shows that only minor changes were introduced, suggesting that OMI and TROPOMI NO2 retrievals were already largely consistent.

2.3. CESM and Decomposition Method

Meteorologically induced variations in O3 were investigated using Version 1.0.4 of the Community Earth System Model (CESM), incorporating the Community Atmospheric Model version 5 (CAM5). CESM employs a horizontal resolution of 1.9° × 2.5° (latitude × longitude) with 56 vertical layers extending from the surface up to 4 hPa. The model simulates concentrations of various trace gases based on the MOZART-4 (Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4) chemical mechanism [33].
In our simulations, anthropogenic emissions were held constant at 2010 levels, while meteorological variables, including horizontal wind, air temperature, land surface temperature, surface pressure, heat fluxes, and wind stresses, were prescribed according to actual conditions. To ensure realistic meteorology, CAM5 simulations were nudged toward the MERRA-2 reanalysis dataset (Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2) at a 3-h temporal resolution (see also https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/d313003/; last access 8 September 2025).
To quantitatively separate the contributions of variations in meteorology and anthropogenic emissions on extreme O3 concentrations, we employed a decomposition method developed by Kang et al. [34]:
C m e t = O i M i M i ( O i 1 ) × 100 %
C e m i s = O i ( M i 1 ) M i ( O i 1 ) × 100 %
where Cmet is the contribution of meteorology, Cemis is the contribution of anthropogenic emission, Mi refers to the normalized annual O3 from simulations, and Oi refers to the normalized annual extreme O3 from observations.

2.4. Model Description and Configuration

To investigate the impact of anthropogenic emission changes on extreme O3 pollution, we selected a representative episode that occurred from 10–12 July 2017. This event affected 13 cities across the SCB, with the highest observe O3 concentration reaching 335 µg m−3. The model simulation was initialized at 00:00 UTC on 4 July 2017, with a six-day spin-up period (4–9 July) to minimize the influence of initial conditions. This episode was chosen due to its spatial coverage and intensity, providing a suitable case for evaluating the effects of emission evolution on extreme O3 levels.
The Weather Research & Forecasting (WRF) model version 4.5 was used to simulate the meteorological fields, which were used to drive the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model, in the O3 pollution episodes. The model is set up with two nested domains centered at the SCB and with horizontal grid numbers (grid space) of 220 × 220 (9 km) and 220 × 220 (3 km) (Figure 1). The vertical direction of the model is divided into 39 sigma layers, with the lowest 20 layers being below 2 km to better resolve the boundary layer. The boundary and initial conditions are derived from the 0.25° NCEP FNL dataset [35], which was also used to analyze the s of temperature and relative humidity in the SCB from 2015 to 2024. The “CONUS” physics suite [36] was chosen for physics schemes.
The CMAQ model version 5.4 was applied to simulate O3 and its precursors in the SCB with the same grid settings as the WRF model. The Carbon Bond version 6 (CB6) mechanism and three-mode Aerosol version 7 (AERO7) scheme were used for gas-phase and aerosol chemical simulations, respectively. The initial and boundary conditions for the outer domain of CMAQ simulation were derived from the Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry (CAM-chem) simulation. The anthropogenic emissions in China were obtained from the Multi-resolution Emission Inventory for China (MEIC, http://www.meicmodel.org/, last accessed: 20 July 2024), which provides monthly gridded emissions at 0.25° × 0.25° resolution. To ensure compatibility with the modeling system, the MEIC emissions were interpolated to the WRF–CMAQ domains at 9 km and 3 km resolutions. In addition, temporal allocation was applied by introducing sector-specific weekly and diurnal variation factors, allowing the monthly totals to be distributed into hourly emission fluxes. Biogenic emissions were generated from the Model for Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature (MEGAN) version 2.1 [37]. Biomass burning emissions were derived from the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) version 4 [38].
Process Analysis (PA) technique is used to quantify the contributions of different physical and chemical processes to changes in pollutant concentrations in CMAQ simulations. The PA includes two components: Integrated Process Rate (IPR) analysis and Integrated Reaction Rate (IRR) analysis. IPR tracks changes in species due to physical processes like advection, diffusion, emissions, deposition, and aerosols, as well as the overall effect of chemical processes. IRR focuses on the rates of individual chemical reactions or specified combinations of reactions and species cycling.

2.5. Model Evaluation Metrics

The Pearson correlation coefficient, NMB, and normalized mean error (NME) were calculated to assess the model’s performance in simulating ozone concentrations in the Sichuan basin. The NMB and NME were determined using the following formulas:
N M B = i = 1 N M i O i i = 1 N O i × 100 %
N M E = i = 1 N M i O i i = 1 N O i × 100 %
where Mi represents the hourly model simulations, Oi represents the hourly observations, and N is the number of data pairs.

3. Results

3.1. Long-Term Variation in Extreme O3 Pollution in Sichuan Basin

Based on the boxplot analysis of O3 concentrations in 22 cities across the SCB from 2015 to 2024, distinct trends were observed between hourly and exceeded-hour O3 pollution (>200 μg m−3). The boxplot of hourly O3 concentrations, along with the corresponding annual mean values, shows a clear and consistent increase in the median, mean, and upper whisker values over the decade (Figure 2). This indicates a gradual rise in both background and high-end ambient O3 levels throughout the basin. In contrast, the boxplot for exceeded-hour O3 concentration reveals a different temporal pattern, the median, mean and upper whisker values all peaked around 2019–2020, followed by a decline trend in subsequent years. The notable downward trend of the upper whisker suggests a weakening in the intensity of the extreme O3 pollution in the SCB. A similar temporal feature was also identified when using the 8-h exceedance O3 (Figure S3).
From 2015 to 2024, O3 pollution in the SCB showed an overall pattern of spatial expansion and increasing frequency in the earlier years, followed by slight decline after 2020. The number of cities experiencing O3 pollution hours increased significantly from 2015 to 2020, then remained relatively stable at around 19–20 cities (Figure 2), indicating that O3 pollution had reached a broad spatial coverage over the basin. By 2024, only Aba and Ganzi Prefectures, located on the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, had not reported any O3 pollution, likely due to their geographic remoteness and low anthropogenic precursor emissions.
The total number of O3 pollution hours across all cities in the SCB increased significantly from 490 h in 2015 to a peak of 1549 h in 2022, before showing a declining trend thereafter. This upward trend before 2020 is consistent with previous findings [15] and was mainly driven by a shift in the O3 formation regime, from VOC-limited to transitional or NOx-limited conditions, as a result of substantial reductions in NOx emissions in the SCB [15,21]. Notably, 2021 recorded a sharp drop in O3 pollution hours, primary due to unfavorable meteorological conditions. The interannual variation in average surface temperature and relative humidity in the SCB during the O3 pollution season (April to September), when over 95% of O3 exceedances occurred, indicates that 2021 had the lowest temperature and highest humidity (Figure 3), which are meteorological conditions least favorable for O3 formation [39,40]. In contrast, the exceptionally high pollution hours in 2022 can be attributed to extreme summer heat [22]. When excluding data from August, however, the number of exceedance hours in 2022 was slightly lower than in 2023 and comparable to 2021, highlighting the role of extreme weather events in shaping annual variability in O3 pollution.
To further quantify the relative roles of meteorology and emission control measures in the long-term evolution of extreme O3, we applied a fixed-emissions CESM simulation and compared the CESM (meteorology-only) series to observations. Both CESM-simulated and observed extreme O3 concentrations were first normalized relative to 2015 (Figure 4). The 2015-based series shows that both observation and simulation exhibited minor fluctuations before 2019, but a pronounced decline emerged after 2020, particularly in the observations, suggesting that the recent downward trend cannot be explained by meteorological variability alone.
To further isolate the variations after 2020, the normalized time series was re-based to 2020. Observed extreme O3 concentrations decreased ~10% from 2020 to 2024, while the CESM simulated O3 only declined ~2.6%. Following the decomposition method, this implies that about 75% of the observed decline can be attributed to emission reductions, with the remaining ~25% linked to meteorological variability. Year-by-year decomposition further indicates that the 2021 dip was mainly meteorology-driven (62%), whereas in 2022–2023 adverse meteorological conditions would have increased O3, so the observed decreases in those years must have been overwhelmingly driven by precursors emission reductions.

3.2. Spatiotemporal Variation in O3 Control Regimes

The trends described above, including the continued expansion and increased frequency of O3 pollution events since 2015 and the decline in extreme O3 concentrations after 2020, highlight the need to investigate the underlying mechanisms. One key factor potentially influencing this shift is the spatiotemporal variation in O3 formation regimes. As the chemical sensitivity of O3 formation depends strongly on the relative abundance of VOCs and NOx, understanding the prevailing control regime is essential. In this study, we use FNR as an indicator of O3 formation sensitivity, enabling a detailed analysis of the regional and temporal dynamics of O3 production across the SCB.
Figure 5 presents the spatial distributions of average HCHO, NO2, and FNR over the SCB during the O3 pollution season (April to September) from 2015 to 2024, based on OMI and TROPOMI satellite observations. Elevated HCHO concentrations are observed over the central and southern parts of the basin (Figure 5a), which coincides with the densely populated and industrialized areas. The NO2 columns exhibit two distinct hotspots centered over Chengdu and Chongqing (Figure 5b), consistent with intensive vehicular and industrial NOx emissions in these metropolitan regions.
Due to elevated NOx concentrations in urban areas, the FNR is significantly lower in cities than in surrounding rural regions (Figure 5c), with Chengdu and Chongqing emerging as two prominent low-ratio centers. Based on the threshold values proposed for the Sichuan–Chongqing region (2.5–4.2) [26] and for Chinese cities more broadly (2.3–4.2) [25], our multi-year averages indicate that Chengdu and Chongqing consistently fall within the VOC-limited regime during early afternoon hours in the O3 pollution season. Areas surrounding the two megacities, along with most other urban centers, predominantly lie within the transitional regime, while more remote regions with limited anthropogenic influence are generally NOx-limited. This spatial pattern aligns well with other studies in the SCB [20,26].
The interannual variation in HCHO and NO2 column density during the O3 pollution season in the SCB is shown in Figure 6. From 2015 to 2024, HCHO levels exhibit an overall increasing trend, with a more pronounced rise observed after 2020. The HCHO values during 2015–2019 show relatively large fluctuations, which may be partly attributed to data quality issues in the OMI product, including frequent data gaps over the SCB. In contrast, NO2 column densities show a continuous declining trend before 2020. A slight increase in column NO2 levels is observed in 2021, followed by a continued decrease thereafter.
The annual evolution of FNR distributions during the O3 pollution season over the SCB is shown in Figure 7. From 2015 to 2017, urban areas exhibited markedly lower FNR values than the surrounding rural and remote mountainous regions. Most cities recorded FNR values below the VOC-limited threshold of 2.5. In particular, the urban cores of Chengdu and Chongqing showed values below 1.0, indicating a strongly VOC-limited regime. With the continued reduction in NOx emissions and the associated decline in NO2 concentrations [15], the extent of VOC-limited regions gradually shrank. By 2024, many small- to medium-sized cities in the SCB had transitioned from VOC-limited regimes to transitional or NOx-limited regimes, with only Chengdu and Chongqing remaining VOC-limited.

3.3. Model Simulation of Extreme O3 Pollution Events

3.3.1. Description of Extreme O3 Pollution Events

To investigate the mechanisms driving extreme O3 pollution in the SCB, a systematic identification of the most severe annual O3 episodes was conducted for the period 2015–2024 based on surface observations from 22 cities. The selection criteria prioritized both spatial extent and pollution intensity, with the primary focus on events exhibiting the widest spatial coverage of O3 exceedances (>200 μg m−3). Specifically, for each year, the dominant episode was defined as the continuous period during which the largest number of cities simultaneously experienced O3 exceedances for at least two consecutive days. In cases where multiple events had similar spatial extents, the event with the higher average exceedance O3 concentration was selected to ensure representation of high-intensity pollution. The identified extreme O3 pollution episodes are summarized in Table 1.
Based on the annually selected extreme O3 pollution events during the 2015–2024 period, this study further analyzed the meteorological conditions during these events to identify their common features and interannual variability. Overall, most extreme O3 events occurred under the control of high-pressure systems, characterized by persistent subsidence in the boundary layer, sparse cloud cover, and weak surface winds (typically <3 m s−1 in the afternoon). These stagnant meteorological conditions hindered pollutant dispersion and removal, creating favorable conditions for ozone accumulation. Figure 8 illustrates the spatial distribution of the 500 hPa geopotential height field, surface wind patterns, and total cloud water content during the July 2017 event, which clearly highlights the typical atmospheric circulation configuration and low-cloud characteristics of such episodes. Notably, the 2023 extreme event exhibited slight differences, influenced by peripheral typhoon cloud systems (Figure S4). Localized cloudiness or transient overcast conditions emerged in the basin, which, to some extent, weakened the radiation-enhancing effects compared to other years, making it an exception to the otherwise stable synoptic pattern.
The impact of chemical regimes on O3 formation was also examined using satellite-derived FNR. Results demonstrated that basin-wide FNR values during most extreme O3 events generally exceeded 2.5 (Figure 9), indicating transitional regimes where O3 production is jointly sensitive to VOCs and NOx. In contrast, megacities like Chongqing and Chengdu exhibited relatively lower FNR values (<2.0), suggesting VOC-limited conditions. Additionally, since 2020, FNR values in these megacities have shown an upward trend, implying a gradual weakening of VOC limitation and an increasing importance of NOx control in O3 mitigation.
Considering the representativeness of meteorological conditions, data availability of emission inventories, and evolving chemical regimes, this study selected the July 2017 extreme O3 event as a typical case for subsequent model simulations. Although the 2021 event featured slightly higher peak O3 concentrations, the lack of complete official anthropogenic emission inventories beyond 2020 constrained accurate assessment of emission-driven contributions and effective model validation. In contrast, the 2017 case not only exhibited typical stagnant meteorological conditions and high O3 levels but also benefited from detailed and reliable emission data, making it more valuable for in-depth analysis.
To further explore the factors contributing to the recent decline in extreme O3 concentrations, we conducted a case study using the WRF-CMAQ model to simulate the 2017 extreme O3 pollution event. Three experiments were designed to assess the influence of anthropogenic emission changes on peak O3 levels: a control simulation using July 2017 emissions (CTL), sensitivity experiment 1 using July 2015 emissions (EMIS_2015), and sensitivity experiment 2 using July 2020 emissions (EMIS_2020). This approach allows us to isolate the impact of emission evolution on the intensity of extreme O3 events.

3.3.2. Model Evaluation

The model performance was assessed against observed hourly O3 concentrations from 22 cities across the SCB during the 10–12 July 2017 episode, yielding 1584 paired samples in total. (Figure 10). The model reproduced the temporal variations reasonably well, with correlation coefficients in most cities ranging from 0.6 to 0.9 (Figure 10a). In approximately two-thirds of the cities, the model overestimated O3 concentrations, with an average NMB of 18.2%. The scatter plot of observed versus simulated O3 concentrations (Figure 10b) reveals that the model performed better at higher concentrations (above 100 μg m−3), while it tended to underestimate O3 levels below 50 μg m−3. This bias is mainly due to underestimation of nocturnal boundary-layer turbulent mixing [41], which enhances NO titration, with additional contributions from uncertainties in anthropogenic emissions (especially due to lack of high-resolution inventories) and the representation of fine-scale meteorology [42]. The NME was below 60% in most cities, with an average of 40.9%.
To further assess the model’s ability to reproduce the spatial distribution of O3, Figure 10c presents the distribution of simulated O3 concentrations at 14:00 LT on 11 July, which corresponds to the time of the highest O3 levels and widest spatial coverage of O3 pollution during the simulation period. The simulated O3 field is overlaid with observational data from 156 monitoring stations across the SCB. In most urban areas, the modeled high O3 concentrations closely match the observed values, as indicated by the similar colors between the filled contours and the overlaid scatter points. This spatial agreement demonstrates the model’s strong capability in capturing both the magnitude and spatial extent of the extreme O3 pollution event.

3.3.3. Impact of Emissions Variation on Extreme O3

Figure 11a compares the hourly O3 concentrations averaged across all cities in the Sichuan Basin on 11 July 2017, as simulated by the three model experiments. Among the three cases, the control simulation (CTL) using 2017 emissions produced the highest O3 levels throughout the day, especially around midday, with concentrations exceeding those in the two sensitivity experiments by 20–30 μg m−3. The two sensitivity simulations, EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020, showed relatively similar diurnal patterns, with EMIS_2015 producing slightly higher O3 concentrations than EMIS_2020 in the afternoon hours. The two megacities, Chengdu and Chongqing, exhibited similar daytime patterns to the SCB city average (Figure 11a,b). However, during nighttime, the EMIS_2015 simulation showed significantly lower O3 levels compared to the other two experiments.
During this extreme O3 pollution episode, FNR values across 22 cities in the SCB in the afternoon (13:00 LT) were 6.5 in the CTL experiment, and 4.4 and 4.8 in the EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020 experiments (Figure 12a), respectively, all indicating a NOx-limited regime [25,26]. However, both Chengdu and Chongqing consistently fell within the VOC-limited regime in all three experiments. This was particularly evident in Chengdu, where the FNR values remained below 0.5 across all scenarios, indicating strong sensitivity to VOCs.
According to the MEIC emission inventory, although total NOx emissions in the SCB declined continuously from 2015 to 2020 (Figure 13), the urban NOx emission flux in 2017 (CTL experiment) was 7% and 18% higher than in 2015 (EMIS_2015) and 2020 (EMIS_2020), respectively. Meanwhile, urban VOC emission fluxes in CTL were 19% and 26% higher than those in EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020, respectively. These precursor differences led to enhanced O3 production in the CTL simulation, as also indicated by the CMAQ process analysis (Figure 12b), which showed the strongest chemical production of O3 in urban areas under the 2017 emissions scenario.
To further elucidate the underlying chemical mechanisms, an IRR analysis was conducted to explicitly quantify the key reaction pathways controlling O3 formation and loss under different emission scenarios (Figure 14). The daytime (10–14 LT) O3 budget (production, chemical loss, and titration) indicates that the CTL case exhibited the largest fluxes in all terms, consistent with its highest simulated O3 concentrations (Figure 14a). Both EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020 showed systematically weaker production and loss, reflecting the strong sensitivity of O3 chemistry to precursor emissions. Similar patterns were also found at night, confirming the robustness of these results.
In addition, the reaction rates of anthropogenic VOC (aVOC) oxidation by OH (aVOC → RO2), RO2 + NO → NO2 (the dominant propagation step linking NOx to O3 formation), and OH + NO2 → HNO3 (the major NOx sink) were examined (Figure 14b). The CTL experiment again showed the strongest fluxes in all three reactions, demonstrating that both VOC-derived radical production and NO-driven propagation were maximized in 2017, thereby sustaining the highest O3 levels under favorable meteorological conditions. In contrast, the EMIS_2020 case exhibited substantially weakened radical production and propagation, highlighting the role of sustained emission reductions in driving the observed decline in extreme O3 concentrations after 2020.

4. Discussion

The long-term changes in O3 pollution in the SCB since 2015 reveal a clear evolution in its spatial characteristics, intensity, and chemical formation regimes. The simultaneous persistence of high spatial extent and frequency of O3 pollution since 2020, alongside a marked decline in the intensity of extreme concentrations, suggests a fundamental shift in the characteristic of O3 pollution in the region. Decomposition analysis reveals that ~75% of the decline stemmed from precursor emission reduction, while meteorological variability accounted for only ~25%. The persistence of declining extreme O3 levels under adverse meteorological conditions in 2022–2023 further underscores the dominance of anthropogenic mitigation measures in curbing regional O3 pollution.
Satellite observations of HCHO and NO2 offer valuable insights into this transformation. The rising HCHO levels and declining NO2 concentrations observed between 2015 and 2024 have significantly altered the chemical environment of O3 formation. These trends are consistent with prior findings in both the SCB and other heavily polluted regions in China. For instance, a similar upward trend in HCHO has also been reported in this region [26] and over North China [43]. In contrast, NO2 column densities exhibited a continuous downward trend before 2020, again in agreement with earlier studies [15,26]. These simultaneous changes in precursors led to increasing values of the FNR. The upward trend in FNR indicates a shift in chemical regimes from VOC-limited to transitional or NOx-limited conditions in many cities across the SCB, particularly after 2020. This is in line with the threshold criteria for chemical regimes in Chinese cities proposed by other studies [25,26].
This regime transition has substantial implications for O3 photochemistry. Under VOC-limited conditions, reducing NOx has limited efficacy and may even worsen O3 levels. However, once the regime shifts to NOx-limited or transitional, ongoing reductions in NOx can effectively suppress O3 production [12]. In the SCB, many small- to medium-sized cities have already transitioned into such regimes, while Chengdu and Chongqing remain VOC-limited due to high NOx emissions. The regime shift also reduces NO titration effects and enables more efficient photochemical O3 production under favorable meteorological conditions, such as high temperatures and intense solar radiation [44,45].
While our long-term FNR analysis indicates a shift in O3 formation sensitivity across the Sichuan Basin, it is important to recognize that HCHO represents only one class of oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs) and does not fully capture the speciated VOC mixture that controls local ozone production. HCHO is a useful, satellite-retrievable proxy for VOC reactivity because it is both directly emitted and produced during VOC oxidation. Nevertheless, observational studies and ozone formation potential analysis in the SCB show that alkenes, aromatics, and OVOCs often contribution disproportionately to ozone formation potential (OFP) relative to their mixing ratios [46,47]. These species can therefore dominate local O3 production even when bulk HCHO suggests a given regime.
It should also be noted that the spatial resolution of satellite products introduces additional uncertainty into city-scale FNR estimates. Previous work has shown that coarse-resolution sensors such as OMI can lose more than 10% of spatial information compared with TROPOMI, and large pixels may fail to capture fine-scale urban variability, particularly for localized NO2 hotspots [48]. Such representation errors can bias FNRs, as NO2 tends to be more spatially heterogeneous than HCHO. Nevertheless, in urban areas with stronger column signals, the relative errors are generally moderate (<50%), whereas rural regions may experience much larger uncertainties. Since our analysis focuses mainly on urban centers such as Chengdu and Chongqing and relies on the higher-resolution TROPOMI product in recent years, the impact of spatial resolution limitations on our basin-scale conclusions is expected to be limited.
In addition to changes in precursor emissions and chemical regimes, meteorological conditions also played an important role in shaping extreme O3 pollution across the SCB. Interannual variations in temperature, humidity, and cloudiness significantly influenced the intensity of extreme events. For instance, the sharp decline in O3 exceedance hours in 2021 coincided with unusually low seasonal temperature and high humidity, conditions that suppress photochemical O3 formation by reducing actinic radiation, slowing temperature-dependent reactions, and enhancing removal through wet deposition [39,40]. Conversely, the exceptionally high O3 pollution hours in 2022 were largely driven by extreme summer heatwaves, illustrating how meteorological anomalies can amplify pollution episodes. However, the decomposition analysis shows that the overall decline in extreme O3 concentrations after 2020 cannot be explained by meteorology alone. Adverse meteorological conditions in 2022–2023 should have driven higher O3 levels; however, observed concentrations continued to decline. This contrast provides clear evidence that sustained reductions in precursor emissions were the dominant driver of the post-2020 decline. These results underscore both the strong modulation of extreme O3 by meteorology and the effectiveness of emission controls in mitigating peak concentrations.
Beyond year-to-year differences, typical extreme O3 events shared common meteorological characteristics. Extreme O3 pollution episodes were often associated with persistent high-pressure systems, clear skies, and stagnant surface winds (<3 m/s), which together facilitated the accumulation of O3 precursors and enhanced photochemical production. These features are indicative of strong solar radiation and poor dispersion conditions, consistent with previous findings [39].
Model simulations further confirm the key role of anthropogenic emissions in shaping extreme O3 events. The CTL simulation, which used 2017 emissions, produced the highest O3 concentrations among the three experiments. This result is consistent with its higher levels of NOx and VOC emissions, along with elevated FNR values, which together created more favorable conditions for photochemical O3 formation.
Interestingly, although the EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020 simulations yielded similar average FNR values across urban areas in the SCB, their different NOx levels led to distinct O3 behaviors. In the higher-NOx EMIS_2015 experiment, daytime O3 formation was slightly stronger due to enhanced photochemical reactions under NOx-limited conditions, while nighttime O3 levels were lower because of increased titration by NO. These results emphasize the dual role of NOx in NOx-limited regimes: it enhances O3 formation during the day but suppresses O3 concentrations at night through titration processes [39].
Altogether, the persistent increase in average O3 concentrations and the expansion of O3 pollution coverage in the SCB appear to be driven by a combination of rising VOC availability (e.g., HCHO), decreasing NOx, and shifting chemical regimes. At the same time, the recent decline in extreme O3 concentrations since 2020 can be attributed to continued NOx emission reductions and increased prevalence of NOx-limited conditions across the basin.

5. Conclusions

This study examined the evolution of extreme ozone pollution in the SCB from 2015 to 2024 based on surface observations. The changes in O3 formation regimes were further investigated using satellite-retrieved column densities of HCHO and NO2. To explore the underlying mechanisms driving the variations in extreme O3 pollution, a typical episode was simulated using the WRF-CMAQ model. The key findings are summarized as follows.
From 2015 to 2024, average O3 concentrations in the Sichuan Basin increased, alongside a rise in both the number of cities affected and the total O3 pollution hours. While the number of polluted cities stabilized after 2020, pollution hours peaked in 2022 before declining. Notably, extreme O3 concentrations have been steadily decreasing since 2020. These trends suggest that O3 pollution in the region has become more widespread but less intense. Decomposition analysis show that precursor emission reduction contributed ~75% of the post-2020 decline in extreme O3 concentrations, meteorological variability explained the remaining ~25%.
Satellite observations of HCHO and NO2 from 2015 to 2024 reveal a clear spatial and temporal evolution of O3 formation regimes across the SCB. Chengdu and Chongqing consistently remained in the VOC-limited regime, while surrounding urban and rural areas exhibited a gradual transition from VOC-limited to transitional or NOx-limited regimes, driven by increasing HCHO levels and decreasing NO2 concentrations. The corresponding rise in FNR values indicates a regional shift in O3 sensitivity, which likely contributed to the broadening spatial extent and persistence of O3 pollution during this period.
Model simulations of a representative extreme O3 pollution episode demonstrate that stronger anthropogenic emissions across the cities in the SCB in 2017 led to higher O3 concentrations, particularly under NOx-limited conditions. Despite similar FNR patterns, the EMIS_2015 case with higher NOx levels enhanced daytime O3 formation but increased nighttime titration, leading to lower nocturnal O3 compared to EMIS_2020. Over time, emission reductions, especially in NOx, have weakened the intensity of extreme O3 events, and the observed regime shift toward NOx-limited conditions has further limited peak O3 buildup. IRR analysis further revealed that emission reductions substantially weakened both radical production and NOx-driven propagation, directly contributing to the decline in extreme O3 concentrations after 2020. These findings underscore the critical role of emission control and chemical regime transitions in shaping long-term O3 pollution trends.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/rs17183238/s1, Figure S1: Scatterplots of OMI versus TROPOMI during their overlapping period: (a) HCHO before adjustment, (b) HCHO after adjustment, (c) NO2 before adjustment, and (d) NO2 after adjustment; Figure S2: Monthly variation in column amount of HCHO (a) and NO2 (b) over the SCB from OMI, TROPOMI, and adjusted OMI data; Figure S3: Boxplot of exceeded 8-hour O3 concentrations, annual variations of the number of cities affected by O3 pollution, and total exceedance hours across the Sichuan Basin during 2015-2024; Figure S4: Synoptic patterns of the extreme O3 pollution events on 16 July 2023. The purple contour lines denote the geopotential height (unit: gpm) at the 500 hPa pressure level, the blue shading indicates the total cloud water content (unit: kg m−2), and the colored dots represent the O3 concentrations (unit: mg m−3) in 22 cities within the Sichuan Basin. The wind field (unit: m s−1) is represented by arrows.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K. and Z.G.; writing—original draft, H.K.; investigation, H.K.; methodology, B.L. and H.L.; formal analysis, H.K. and B.L.; writing—review & editing, B.L. and Z.G.; resources, L.H., J.S. and Y.Z.; validation, L.H.; data curation, L.H. and J.S.; software, H.L. and Y.Z.; visualization, H.K. and Y.Z.; project administration, Z.G.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. and Z.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFE0209500) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 42205186, 42275115).

Data Availability Statement

The CNEMC ozone observation data were downloaded from https://www.cnemc.cn/ (last access: 13 March 2025). The OMI HCHO data are available at https://acdisc.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/Aura_OMI_Level3/OMHCHOd.003/ (last access: 15 June 2025). The TROPOMI HCHO data are obtained from https://doi.org/10.15489/7ans8ijc2w27 (lase access: 24 April 2025). The OMI and TROPOMI NO2 data were derived from https://www.temis.nl/ (last access: 24 April 2025). The CMAQ model output data are available at https://zenodo.org/records/16436312.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the MEIC team at Tsinghua University for providing the MEIC emissions data, to NCEP for supplying the final reanalysis meteorological datasets, and to the CESM2 development team at UCAR/NCAR’s Atmospheric Chemistry Observations and Modeling Laboratory for providing the CAM-chem datasets.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AERO7three-mode Aerosol version 7
CAM-chemCommunity Atmosphere Model with Chemistry
CB6Carbon Bond version 6
CESMCommunity Earth System Model (CESM)
CMAQCommunity Multiscale Air Quality
CNEMCChina National Environmental Monitoring Center
FNRHCHO to NO2 column concentrations ratio
GFEDGlobal Fire Emissions Database
HCHOformaldehyde
IPRIntegrated Process Rate
IRRIntegrated Reaction Rate
MEICMulti-resolution Emission Inventory for China
MEGANModel for Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature
MEEMinistry of Ecology and Environment
MOZART-4Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4
NCEP FNLNational Center for Environmental Prediction’s final operational global analyses
NOxnitrogen oxides
NO2nitrogen dioxide
NMBnormalized mean bias
NMEnormalized mean error
O3ozone
OHhydroxyl radicals
OMIOzone Monitoring Instrument
PAProcess Analysis
PMparticulate matter
QA4ECVquality-controlled
SCBSichuan Basin
TROPOMITROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument
VOCsvolatile organic compounds
WRFWeather Research & Forecasting

References

  1. Anenberg, S.C.; West, J.J.; Fiore, A.M.; Jaffe, D.A.; Prather, M.J.; Bergmann, D.; Cuvelier, K.; Dentener, F.J.; Duncan, B.N.; Gauss, M.; et al. Intercontinental Impacts of Ozone Pollution on Human Mortality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6482–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dewan, S.; Lakhani, A. Impact of ozone pollution on crop yield, human health, and associated economic costs in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 945, 173820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lefohn, A.S.; Malley, C.S.; Smith, L.; Wells, B.; Hazucha, M.; Simon, H.; Naik, V.; Mills, G.; Schultz, M.G.; Paoletti, E.; et al. Tropospheric ozone assessment report: Global ozone metrics for climate change, human health, and crop/ecosystem research. Elem. Sci. Anthr. 2018, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Geng, G.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, T.; Zhao, H.; Tong, D.; Zheng, B.; Li, M.; Liu, F.; Hong, C.; et al. Drivers of PM2.5 air pollution deaths in China 2002–2017. Nat. Geosci. 2021, 14, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, Q.; Geng, G.; Xue, T.; Liu, S.; Cai, C.; He, K.; Zhang, Q. Tracking PM2.5 and O3 Pollution and the Related Health Burden in China 2013–2020. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 6922–6932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zheng, B.; Tong, D.; Li, M.; Liu, F.; Hong, C.; Geng, G.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Peng, L.; Qi, J.; et al. Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 14095–14111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, K.; Jacob, D.J.; Shen, L.; Lu, X.; De Smedt, I.; Liao, H. Increases in surface ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2019: Anthropogenic and meteorological influences. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 11423–11433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mousavinezhad, S.; Choi, Y.; Pouyaei, A.; Ghahremanloo, M.; Nelson, D.L. A comprehensive investigation of surface ozone pollution in China, 2015–2019: Separating the contributions from meteorology and precursor emissions. Atmos. Res. 2021, 257, 105599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Parrish, D.D.; Wang, S.; Bao, F.; Ni, R.; Li, X.; Yang, S.; Wang, H.; Cheng, Y.; Su, H. Long-term trend of ozone pollution in China during 2014–2020: Distinct seasonal and spatial characteristics and ozone sensitivity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2022, 22, 8935–8949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, D.; Jin, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, T.; Zhuang, B.; Li, S.; Xie, M. Anthropogenically and meteorologically modulated summertime ozone trends and their health implications since China’s clean air actions. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 343, 123234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Y.; Geng, G.; Cheng, J.; Liu, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, L.; Shi, Q.; Tong, D.; He, K.; Zhang, Q. Drivers of Increasing Ozone during the Two Phases of Clean Air Actions in China 2013–2020. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 8954–8964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seinfeld, J.H.; Pandis, S.N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  13. Tan, Z.; Lu, K.; Dong, H.; Hu, M.; Li, X.; Liu, Y.; Lu, S.; Shao, M.; Su, R.; Wang, H.; et al. Explicit diagnosis of the local ozone production rate and the ozone-NO(x)-VOC sensitivities. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kirchner, F.; Jeanneret, F.; Clappier, A.; Krüger, B.; van den Bergh, H.; Calpini, B. Total VOC reactivity in the planetary boundary layer: 2. A new indicator for determining the sensitivity of the ozone production to VOC and NOx. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2001, 106, 3095–3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, K.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Lei, Y. Drivers of 2013-2020 ozone trends in the Sichuan Basin, China: Impacts of meteorology and precursor emission changes. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 300, 118914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ji, X.; Hong, Y.; Lin, Y.; Xu, K.; Chen, G.; Liu, T.; Xu, L.; Li, M.; Fan, X.; Wang, H.; et al. Impacts of Synoptic Patterns and Meteorological Factors on Distribution Trends of Ozone in Southeast China During 2015–2020. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2023, 128, e2022JD037961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hu, Y.; Wang, S. Formation mechanism of a severe air pollution event: A case study in the Sichuan Basin, Southwest China. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 246, 118135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, T.; Sun, X.; Bai, Y.; Shu, Z.; Fu, W.; Lu, Z.; Wang, X. Ozone pollution aggravated by mountain-valley breeze over the western Sichuan Basin, Southwest China. Chemosphere 2024, 361, 142445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, X.; Wu, K.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. Origin of regional springtime ozone episodes in the Sichuan Basin, China: Role of synoptic forcing and regional transport. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 278, 116845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wu, K.; Mei, H.; De Smedt, I.; Wang, S.; Fan, J.; Lyu, S.; He, C. Long-term trends of ozone and precursors from 2013 to 2020 in a megacity (Chengdu), China: Evidence of changing emissions and chemistry. Atmos. Res. 2022, 278, 106309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ren, J.; Guo, F.; Xie, S. Diagnosing ozone–NOx–VOC sensitivity and revealing causes of ozone increases in China based on 2013–2021 satellite retrievals. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2022, 22, 15035–15047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, N.; Du, Y.; Chen, D.; Meng, H.; Chen, X.; Zhou, L.; Shi, G.; Zhan, Y.; Feng, M.; Li, W.; et al. Spatial disparities of ozone pollution in the Sichuan Basin spurred by extreme, hot weather. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2024, 24, 3029–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. GB 3095-2012; Ambien Air Quality Standards. MEE: Beijing, China, 2012.
  24. GB 3095-2012; Revision of the Ambien Air Quality Standards. MEE: Beijing, China, 2018.
  25. Wang, W.; van der A, R.; Ding, J.; van Weele, M.; Cheng, T. Spatial and temporal changes of the ozone sensitivity in China based on satellite and ground-based observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2021, 21, 7253–7269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Y.; Yu, C.; Tao, J.; Lu, X.; Chen, L. Analysis of Ozone Formation Sensitivity in Chinese Representative Regions Using Satellite and Ground-Based Data. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Levelt, P.F.; van den Oord, G.H.J.; Dobber, M.R.; Malkki, A.; Huib, V.; Johan de, V.; Stammes, P.; Lundell, J.O.V.; Saari, H. The ozone monitoring instrument. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 1093–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Veefkind, J.P.; Aben, I.; McMullan, K.; Förster, H.; de Vries, J.; Otter, G.; Claas, J.; Eskes, H.J.; de Haan, J.F.; Kleipool, Q.; et al. TROPOMI on the ESA Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 120, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. van Geffen, J.; Boersma, K.F.; Eskes, H.; Sneep, M.; ter Linden, M.; Zara, M.; Veefkind, J.P. S5P TROPOMI NO2 slant column retrieval: Method, stability, uncertainties and comparisons with OMI. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2020, 13, 1315–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kelly, C. OMI/Aura Formaldehyde (HCHO) Total Column Daily L3 Weighted Mean Global 0.1deg Lat/Lon Grid V003; Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC): Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Boersma, K.F.; Eskes, H.J.; Richter, A.; De Smedt, I.; Lorente, A.; Beirle, S.; van Geffen, J.H.G.M.; Zara, M.; Peters, E.; Van Roozendael, M.; et al. Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO2 retrievals: Results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2018, 11, 6651–6678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. van Geffen, J.; Eskes, H.; Compernolle, S.; Pinardi, G.; Verhoelst, T.; Lambert, J.-C.; Sneep, M.; ter Linden, M.; Ludewig, A.; Boersma, K.F.; et al. Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO2 retrieval: Impact of version v2.2 improvements and comparisons with OMI and ground-based data. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2022, 15, 2037–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Emmons, L.K.; Walters, S.; Hess, P.G.; Lamarque, J.F.; Pfister, G.G.; Fillmore, D.; Granier, C.; Guenther, A.; Kinnison, D.; Laepple, T.; et al. Description and evaluation of the Model for Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 4 (MOZART-4). Geosci. Model. Dev. 2010, 3, 43–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kang, H.; Zhu, B.; van der A, R.J.; Zhu, C.; de Leeuw, G.; Hou, X.; Gao, J. Natural and anthropogenic contributions to long-term variations of SO2, NO2, CO, and AOD over East China. Atmos. Res. 2019, 215, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. NCEP. NCEP GDAS/FNL 0.25 Degree Global Tropospheric Analyses and Forecast Grids; NCEP: College Park, MD, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Loikith, P.; Tian, B.; Guan, B.; Lee, H.; Kim, J.; Waliser, D.; Ferraro, R.; Wang, W.; Case, J.; Tian, Y.; et al. Sensitivity of CONUS Summer Rainfall to the Selection of Cumulus Parameterization Schemes in NU-WRF Seasonal Simulations. J. Hydrometeorol. 2017, 18, 1689–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guenther, A.B.; Jiang, X.; Heald, C.L.; Sakulyanontvittaya, T.; Duhl, T.; Emmons, L.K.; Wang, X. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): An extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2012, 5, 1471–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Randerson, J.T.; Van Der Werf, G.R.; Giglio, L.; Collatz, G.J.; Kasibhatla, P.S. Global Fire Emissions Database; Version 4.1 (GFEDv4); ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center: Oak Ridge, TN, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang, X.; Wu, K.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Gu, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hu, Y.; Ou, Y.; Wang, S.; et al. Summertime ozone pollution in Sichuan Basin, China: Meteorological conditions, sources and process analysis. Atmos. Environ. 2020, 226, 117392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Camalier, L.; Cox, W.; Dolwick, P. The effects of meteorology on ozone in urban areas and their use in assessing ozone trends. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 7127–7137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhou, M.; Zheng, B.; Li, K.; Liu, Y.; Lin, J.; Fu, T.-M.; Zhang, Q. Exploring 2016–2017 surface ozone pollution over China: Source contributions and meteorological influences. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2019, 19, 8339–8361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.; Wang, T. Worsening urban ozone pollution in China from 2013 to 2017—Part 1: The complex and varying roles of meteorology. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 6305–6321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, L.; Ma, X.; Chen, D. Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Drivers of TROPOMI-Based Tropospheric HCHO Column Concentration in North China. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sillman, S. The relation between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 1821–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jin, X.; Fiore, A.; Boersma, K.F.; Smedt, I.; Valin, L. Inferring Changes in Summertime Surface Ozone-NOx-VOC Chemistry over U.S. Urban Areas from Two Decades of Satellite and Ground-Based Observations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 6518–6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chen, D.; Zhou, L.; Wang, C.; Liu, H.; Qiu, Y.; Shi, G.; Song, D.; Tan, Q.; Yang, F. Characteristics of ambient volatile organic compounds during spring O(3) pollution episode in Chengdu, China. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 114, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kong, L.; Zhou, L.; Chen, D.; Luo, L.; Xiao, K.; Chen, Y.; Liu, H.; Tan, Q.; Yang, F. Atmospheric oxidation capacity and secondary pollutant formation potentials based on photochemical loss of VOCs in a megacity of the Sichuan Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 901, 166259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Souri, A.H.; Johnson, M.S.; Wolfe, G.M.; Crawford, J.H.; Fried, A.; Wisthaler, A.; Brune, W.H.; Blake, D.R.; Weinheimer, A.J.; Verhoelst, T.; et al. Characterization of errors in satellite-based HCHO/NO2 tropospheric column ratios with respect to chemistry, column-to-PBL translation, spatial representation, and retrieval uncertainties. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2023, 23, 1963–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Terrain elevation of the two modeling domains. The horizontal grid spaces for domain d01 and d02 are 9 km and 3 km, respectively. The red dots denote the locations of 22 cities in the Sichuan basin. Two megacities Chengdu (CD) and Chongqing (CQ) are marked by black arrows.
Figure 1. Terrain elevation of the two modeling domains. The horizontal grid spaces for domain d01 and d02 are 9 km and 3 km, respectively. The red dots denote the locations of 22 cities in the Sichuan basin. Two megacities Chengdu (CD) and Chongqing (CQ) are marked by black arrows.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g001
Figure 2. Boxplot of hourly and exceeded-hour O3 concentrations, annual variations in the number of cities affected by O3 pollution, and total exceedance hours across the Sichuan Basin during 2015–2024.
Figure 2. Boxplot of hourly and exceeded-hour O3 concentrations, annual variations in the number of cities affected by O3 pollution, and total exceedance hours across the Sichuan Basin during 2015–2024.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g002
Figure 3. Interannual variation in surface air temperature and relative humidity from April to September in the Sichuan Basin during 2015–2024.
Figure 3. Interannual variation in surface air temperature and relative humidity from April to September in the Sichuan Basin during 2015–2024.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g003
Figure 4. Interannual variations in normalized extreme O3 concentrations from observations and CESM simulations. The main panel is normalized to 2015, while the inset is re-based to 2020.
Figure 4. Interannual variations in normalized extreme O3 concentrations from observations and CESM simulations. The main panel is normalized to 2015, while the inset is re-based to 2020.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of average HCHO (a), NO2 (b), and FNR (c) over the SCB during the O3 pollution season (April to September) from 2015 to 2024.
Figure 5. Spatial distributions of average HCHO (a), NO2 (b), and FNR (c) over the SCB during the O3 pollution season (April to September) from 2015 to 2024.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g005
Figure 6. Interannual variation in column amount of HCHO and NO2 over the SCB from 2015 to 2024.
Figure 6. Interannual variation in column amount of HCHO and NO2 over the SCB from 2015 to 2024.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of FNR during the O3 pollution season over the SCB from 2015 to 2024. Panels (aj) correspond to the average FNR for each year.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of FNR during the O3 pollution season over the SCB from 2015 to 2024. Panels (aj) correspond to the average FNR for each year.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g007
Figure 8. Synoptic patterns of the extreme O3 pollution events on 11 July 2017. The purple contour lines denote the geopotential height (unit: gpm) at the 500 hPa pressure level, the blue shading indicates the total cloud water content (unit: kg m−2), and the colored dots represent the O3 concentrations (unit: mg m−3) in 22 cities within the Sichuan Basin. The wind field (unit: m s−1) is represented by arrows.
Figure 8. Synoptic patterns of the extreme O3 pollution events on 11 July 2017. The purple contour lines denote the geopotential height (unit: gpm) at the 500 hPa pressure level, the blue shading indicates the total cloud water content (unit: kg m−2), and the colored dots represent the O3 concentrations (unit: mg m−3) in 22 cities within the Sichuan Basin. The wind field (unit: m s−1) is represented by arrows.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g008
Figure 9. Interannual variation in satellite-derived formaldehyde-to-NO2 ratio (FNR) across the Sichuan Basin (all cities mean) and its two megacities: Chongqing and Chengdu, during the extreme O3 pollution episodes (2015–2024). Data for Chongqing and Chengdu from 2015–2018 are excluded due to limited sample numbers in OMI data.
Figure 9. Interannual variation in satellite-derived formaldehyde-to-NO2 ratio (FNR) across the Sichuan Basin (all cities mean) and its two megacities: Chongqing and Chengdu, during the extreme O3 pollution episodes (2015–2024). Data for Chongqing and Chengdu from 2015–2018 are excluded due to limited sample numbers in OMI data.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g009
Figure 10. Taylor diagram of correlation coefficient, normalized mean bias (NMB) and normalized mean error (NME) (a); scatter plot (b) for the comparison of simulated and observed O3 concentrations in the Sichuan Basin; and spatial distribution of simulated O3 concentrations at 14:00 LT on 11 July, overlaid with observational data from 156 surface monitoring stations (c).
Figure 10. Taylor diagram of correlation coefficient, normalized mean bias (NMB) and normalized mean error (NME) (a); scatter plot (b) for the comparison of simulated and observed O3 concentrations in the Sichuan Basin; and spatial distribution of simulated O3 concentrations at 14:00 LT on 11 July, overlaid with observational data from 156 surface monitoring stations (c).
Remotesensing 17 03238 g010
Figure 11. Diurnal variation in simulated O3 concentrations averaged across all cities in the SCB (a), as well as two megacities Chengdu (CD) (b) and Chongqing (CQ) (c) on 11 July 2017 from the control simulation (CTL) and two sensitivity experiments (EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020).
Figure 11. Diurnal variation in simulated O3 concentrations averaged across all cities in the SCB (a), as well as two megacities Chengdu (CD) (b) and Chongqing (CQ) (c) on 11 July 2017 from the control simulation (CTL) and two sensitivity experiments (EMIS_2015 and EMIS_2020).
Remotesensing 17 03238 g011
Figure 12. The FNR values (a) and photochemical production of O3 (b) over the SCB, Chengdu (CD), and Chongqing (CQ) at 13:00 LT in CTL, EMIS_2015, and EMIS_2020 experiments.
Figure 12. The FNR values (a) and photochemical production of O3 (b) over the SCB, Chengdu (CD), and Chongqing (CQ) at 13:00 LT in CTL, EMIS_2015, and EMIS_2020 experiments.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g012
Figure 13. Interannual variation of NOx, VOCs emissions and the VOCs-to-NOx emission ratio in the SCB during 2015–2024, based on the MEIC emission inventory.
Figure 13. Interannual variation of NOx, VOCs emissions and the VOCs-to-NOx emission ratio in the SCB during 2015–2024, based on the MEIC emission inventory.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g013
Figure 14. Integrated Reaction Rate (IRR) analysis of O3 chemistry under three emission scenarios (CTL, EMIS_2015, EMIS_2020). (a) Daytime O3 budget terms (production, chemical loss, and titration). (b) Key reaction pathways, including aVOC → RO2, RO2 + NO → NO2, and OH + NO2 → HNO3.
Figure 14. Integrated Reaction Rate (IRR) analysis of O3 chemistry under three emission scenarios (CTL, EMIS_2015, EMIS_2020). (a) Daytime O3 budget terms (production, chemical loss, and titration). (b) Key reaction pathways, including aVOC → RO2, RO2 + NO → NO2, and OH + NO2 → HNO3.
Remotesensing 17 03238 g014
Table 1. Extreme O3 pollution episodes in each year from 2015 to 2024.
Table 1. Extreme O3 pollution episodes in each year from 2015 to 2024.
YearDominated PeriodMean Exceeded O3
(μg m−3)
Max O3
(μg m−3)
No. of Affected Cities
201527–29 April2272709
201623–25 August2222789
201710–12 July23333513
201815–16 May22828516
201915–18 August23330517
202026–28 August22832714
202130 July–3 August22534318
20225–8 July21932316
202315–18 July22133317
202420–23 August22025819
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, H.; Liu, B.; Hong, L.; Shi, J.; Lu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Z. Emission Control and Sensitivity Regime Shifts Drive the Decline in Extreme Ozone Concentration in the Sichuan Basin During 2015–2024. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3238. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183238

AMA Style

Kang H, Liu B, Hong L, Shi J, Lu H, Zhang Y, Guo Z. Emission Control and Sensitivity Regime Shifts Drive the Decline in Extreme Ozone Concentration in the Sichuan Basin During 2015–2024. Remote Sensing. 2025; 17(18):3238. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183238

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Hanqing, Bojun Liu, Lei Hong, Jingchuan Shi, Hua Lu, Ying Zhang, and Zhaobing Guo. 2025. "Emission Control and Sensitivity Regime Shifts Drive the Decline in Extreme Ozone Concentration in the Sichuan Basin During 2015–2024" Remote Sensing 17, no. 18: 3238. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183238

APA Style

Kang, H., Liu, B., Hong, L., Shi, J., Lu, H., Zhang, Y., & Guo, Z. (2025). Emission Control and Sensitivity Regime Shifts Drive the Decline in Extreme Ozone Concentration in the Sichuan Basin During 2015–2024. Remote Sensing, 17(18), 3238. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17183238

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop