Next Article in Journal
Sex-Specific Changes in Gut Microbiome Composition following Blueberry Consumption in C57BL/6J Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Variability of Serum Proteins in Chinese and Dutch Human Milk during Lactation
Previous Article in Journal
Monobutyrin Reduces Liver Cholesterol and Improves Intestinal Barrier Function in Rats Fed High-Fat Diets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantification of Human Milk Phospholipids: the Effect of Gestational and Lactational Age on Phospholipid Composition
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Do a Few Weeks Matter? Late Preterm Infants and Breastfeeding Issues

Nutrients 2019, 11(2), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020312
by Beatrice Letizia Crippa 1,2,*, Lorenzo Colombo 1,2, Daniela Morniroli 1,2, Dario Consonni 3, Maria Enrica Bettinelli 4, Irene Spreafico 5, Giulia Vercesi 1,2, Patrizio Sannino 5, Paola Agnese Mauri 2,6, Lidia Zanotta 1,2, Annalisa Canziani 2,6, Paola Roggero 1,2, Laura Plevani 1, Donatella Bertoli 5, Stefania Zorzan 5, Maria Lorella Giannì 1,2 and Fabio Mosca 1,2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2019, 11(2), 312; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11020312
Submission received: 12 December 2018 / Revised: 27 January 2019 / Accepted: 29 January 2019 / Published: 1 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Milk and Lactation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting paper. I have compiled a list of comments which I've attached in a separate file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,                                                                                                                

We appreciate your suggestions and your comments. As you suggest, we edit English language and style and we enclose the certificate. On the following, the replies to your comments are listed point-by-point.

 

Sincerely,

The Authors


Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a good and accurate review of the literature enhanced by new data, which supports previous reports.  The new data would have been stronger if the number of subjects (babies and mothers) had been increased by at least 100 percent.  The conclusions and recommendations are sound and in agreement with what is generally recommended.  The English writing is in need of significant editing for style, spelling, grammar and clarity, although the message is clearly presented.

Author Response

January 18, 2019

 

Dear Reviewer,                                                                                                                

We appreciate your suggestions and your comments. As you suggest, we did extensive editing of English language and style and we enclose the certificate.

 

Sincerely,

The Authors

 


Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for giving me the opportunity to read your interesting manuscript. You have addressed my comments from the previous review satisfactorily.


Author Response

Thank you for having reviewed our article.

We previously replied to comments and suggestions.

Back to TopTop