Next Article in Journal
Validation of Sensor-Based Food Intake Detection by Multicamera Video Observation in an Unconstrained Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Insulin in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes—Should the Dose of Insulin Before a Meal be Based on Glycemia or Meal Content?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/nu11030608
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Methyl Donor Micronutrients that Modify DNA Methylation and Cancer Outcome

by
Abeer M. Mahmoud
1,2,* and
Mohamed M. Ali
1,2
1
Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St. (AHSB), Room 433, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
2
Integrative Physiology Laboratory, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2019, 11(3), 608; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030608
Submission received: 16 February 2019 / Revised: 5 March 2019 / Accepted: 7 March 2019 / Published: 13 March 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism that is essential for regulating gene transcription. However, aberrant DNA methylation, which is a nearly universal finding in cancer, can result in disturbed gene expression. DNA methylation is modified by environmental factors such as diet that may modify cancer risk and tumor behavior. Abnormal DNA methylation has been observed in several cancers such as colon, stomach, cervical, prostate, and breast cancers. These alterations in DNA methylation may play a critical role in cancer development and progression. Dietary nutrient intake and bioactive food components are essential environmental factors that may influence DNA methylation either by directly inhibiting enzymes that catalyze DNA methylation or by changing the availability of substrates required for those enzymatic reactions such as the availability and utilization of methyl groups. In this review, we focused on nutrients that act as methyl donors or methylation co-factors and presented intriguing evidence for the role of these bioactive food components in altering DNA methylation patterns in cancer. Such a role is likely to have a mechanistic impact on the process of carcinogenesis and offer possible therapeutic potentials.

1. Introduction

Cancer is an outcome of aberrant genetic and epigenetic events. Epigenetic mechanisms are responsible for regulating gene expression without changing the DNA sequence. These mechanisms mainly include chromatin remodeling, histone modification, and DNA methylation, the latter being the most investigated mechanism and the focus of the current review [1]. The process of DNA methylation includes the addition of methyl groups to the cytosine residues; a biological process that depends on the availability of methyl groups and accordingly the function of methyl donors and acceptors [2]. Micronutrients such as folate, choline, betaine, vitamin B12, and other B vitamins contribute to DNA methylation as methyl donors and co-factors [3]. Therefore, the status of these nutrients might correlate with DNA methylation and offer potential preventive and therapeutic targets in pathological conditions such as cancer where aberrant DNA methylation is frequently observed.
It is widely accepted that DNA methylation profiles are dynamic and prone to modifications in response to normal development and aging, environmental factors, and pathological conditions [4,5]. For example, DNA undergoes progressive global hypomethylation and gene-specific hypermethylation as individuals age, leading to genomic instability or gene-specific suppression [4]. A similar pattern has been observed in cancer where DNA is globally hypomethylated while tumor suppressor genes are hypermethylated compared to normal tissues [6]. Whether these epigenetic patterns are a cause or an outcome of cancer is not entirely understood. Yet, cancer could be prevented through changes in diet or lifestyle that might be attributed to the dynamic and adaptable nature of cancer-associated epigenetic processes, particularly, DNA methylation.
In the present review, we summarized preclinical and clinical studies that provide intriguing evidence on the interrelation between nutritional methyl donors and carbon one metabolism co-factors and cancer through regulating DNA methylation patterns. Additionally, this review characterizes the differential effects of micronutrient methyl donors on global versus gene-specific DNA methylation and the effect of variables such as health status, source of biological samples that were analyzed, mode (dietary versus supplemental) and quantity of nutrient exposure, and other confounders in an effort to unravel potential sources of discrepancies in the literature

2. DNA Methylation

DNA methylation is an epigenetic mechanism that is essential for regulating gene transcription. This mechanism is mediated via the addition of a methyl group to the cytosine residues in a cytosine-guanine (CG) pair generating 5-methylcytosine. In the intergenic regions and repetitive sequences of the human genome, CpG sites are sparse and mostly methylated. Hypomethylation of CpG sites in these regions may lead to genomic instability and loss of gene imprinting, which eventually result in the development of neoplastic cells [7]. On the other hand, gene promoters are rich in CpG sites that are sometimes densely packed forming what is known as CpG islands. These islands are mostly unmethylated in order to allow gene transcription. Aberrant hypermethylation of these CpG sites may silence the expression of genes that are critical to cell homeostasis, DNA integrity, or genome stability, resulting in cancer development and progression [8].
The process of DNA methylation is catalyzed by a group of enzymes called DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), namely, DNMT1, DNMT2, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, and DNMTL. DNMT1 maintains DNA methylation during cell replication while the rest of the DNMT family, mainly DNMT3a and DNMT3b, are responsible for de novo DNA methylation [9].
DNMTs that are responsible for de novo DNA methylation are highly expresses in developing embryos than adult tissues; yet, there is growing evidence that they play a role in maintaining DNA methylation patterns. For instance, combined genetic deletion or silencing of DNAMT1 and DNMT3b reduced DNA methylation to a greater extent than deleting or silencing either genes alone, supporting the critical role of de novo DNMTs in maintaining DNA methylation [10,11,12]. On the other hand, some studies suggested that DNMT1 is required for de novo DNA methylation. For example, a study by Liang et al. [13] showed that DNMT3a and DNMT3b did not induce de novo DNA methylation efficiently in mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNMT1 gene. Other studies have supported this co-operativity between DNMTs in de novo DNA methylation [14,15,16]. The process of methyl transfer starts by non-specific binding of DNMTs to DNA followed by recognition of specific DNA sites and recruitment of the methyl group donor, S-adnosylmethionine. DNMTs incorporate the donated methyl group into carbon 5 of the cytosine residue followed by a release of the DNMT enzyme and s-adenosylhomocysteine [16].
When it takes place at gene promoters, DNA methylation results in transcriptional repression either via interfering with the binding of transcription activating factors or by recruiting transcriptional repressors such as methyl-binding proteins, histone deacetylases (HDACs), and histone methyltransferases that reduces chromatin accessibility [17]. Absent or inactive DNMTs, mainly DNMT1, will induce passive demethylation of the CpG sites and subsequently aberrant gene expression [18]. DNA hypomethylation can also be induced via active demethylation by the ten-eleven translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase family of enzymes (TETs) that helps create a balanced methylation profile in the human genome [19]. TET enzymes oxidize 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) to 5-hydroxy-mC (5-hmC), which is modified through several suggested mechanisms including deamination and decarboxylation that ultimately lead to base excision repair and replacement with an unmethylated cytosine [20]. TET1 is the most prominent member of the TET family, and previous studies showed that knockdown of TET1 results in increased global methylation in mice [21]. Other suggested mechanisms for active DNA demethylation include: (1) base excision repair via DNA glycosylase either by directly acting on 5-mC residue or following 5-mC deamination and conversion into Thymine; (2) oxidative or hydrolytic removal of the methyl group; or (3) nucleotide excision repair system that severs methylated CpG dinucleotides. Current efforts are underway to study the role of DNA active demethylation in cancer and developmental diseases [22].

3. DNA Methylation in Cancer

The two main salient features of aberrant DNA methylation in cancer are 1) global DNA hypomethylation that takes place in the intergenic regions and repetitive DNA sequences and 2) local DNA hypermethylation in CpG islands located in specific gene promoters [23]. The latter phenomenon is induced by de novo DNA methylation that is mediated via DNMT3a and DNMT3b and is accompanied by a suppressed transcription of corresponding genes [24]. Several studies have shown that DNA hypermethylation in cancer cells targets tumor suppressor genes explicitly, resulting in growth selection and uncontrolled cell proliferation [25,26,27,28]. Many tumor suppressor genes are inactivated by this mechanism in cancer such as the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) [29], retinoblastoma (Rb) [30], Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), BRCA1 [31], and several other genes that are involved in DNA repair (MGMT; O-6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase), cell cycle progression (p16INK4a, p15INK4b), apoptosis (DAPK; death-associated protein kinase-1), or antioxidation (GSTP1; Glutathione S-Transferase P-1) [32]. The extent to which DNA de novo methylation contributes to cancer development and progression varies among different types of cancer; very high in colon cancer, while rare in brain tumors [33].
There is also growing evidence indicating that global hypomethylation may lead to genome instability and DNA breakage [4]. Furthermore, global hypomethylation may be accompanied by loss of imprinting of some oncogenes leading to cancer development such as insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-1) in colon cancer [34]. The oncogenes that are linked to cancer and activated via hypomethylation are protease urokinase, mesothelin, cancer-testis genes, claudin4, S100A4, heparinase, and the proopiomelanocortin gene [35]. Global DNA hypomethylation in cancer cells has been suggested to be attributed to one of the following causes: (1) a discoordination between DNA replication in cancer cells and DNMT-1 activity; (2) a natural selection of hypomethylated DNA patterns accompanying overexpression of specific oncogenes or genomic instabilities that facilitate cancer cell growth and expansion; or (3) a consequence of chromatin dysregulation and nuclear disorganization that occur during cancer progression [36].
Under normal conditions, cells possess standard methylation profiles by maintaining a balance between DNA methylation and demethylation processes. This balance is disturbed under pathological conditions such as inflammation, oxidative stress and cancer resulting in diverse phenotypes [37]. Due to the dynamic and reversible nature of the DNA methylation process, it has been viewed as an attractive target for cancer therapy. The de novo DNA methylation in cancer has been successfully targeted via the DNMT potent inhibitor, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-AZA) in experimental studies and in the clinical settings for treating leukemia [38]. Treatment with 5-AZA reduced DNMT3b in breast cancer cells and restored the expression of TSGs such as RASSF1A (Ras association domain family member 1) in hepatocellular carcinoma, P53 in melanoma, and cyclin-dependent kinase-2B (CDKN2B) in myelodysplastic syndrome [39,40,41,42].
There is a cumulative body of evidence indicating DNA methylation adaptability to environmental factors including diet and nutritional elements [43,44]. Nutrients have been shown to modify DNA methylation either globally or at specific CpG sites by inducing the formation of methyl donors, acting as co-enzymes, or modifying DNMT enzymatic activity [45]. The interaction between nutrients and epigenetics has been referred to as “Nutri-epigenomics”, which is an emerging and promising field that offers opportunities for future applications of bioactive nutrients as epigenetic modifiers in diseases where aberrant DNA methylation occurs [46,47].

4. Effects of Nutrients and Bioactive Food Components on DNA Methylation

One of the proposed mechanisms by which nutrients may modify DNA methylation is by participating in a cellular process known as “one-carbon metabolism” that provides methyl groups for biological methylation of DNA, protein, or phospholipids [48]. One carbon metabolism is a process that is involved in amino acid and nucleotide metabolism and comprises a group of biochemical reactions that are catalyzed by a unique set of enzymes and coenzymes (Figure 1). This set of reactions is referred to as one-carbon metabolism since they transfer one-carbon groups from donors to protein or DNA. During this process, cyclical chemical reactions take place in mammalian cells where nutrients such as folate, vitamin B12, vitamin B6, betaine, choline, and methionine play a significant role as co-factors or methyl acceptors or donors [49]. This process starts with a one-carbon transfer from the amino acid serine to tetrahydrofolate; the latter is a form of vitamin B-9 that is naturally present in many food sources and is essential for the nucleic acid synthesis and other vital biological processes in the body. This reaction is catalyzed by the enzyme serine hydroxymethyltransferase, a vitamin B6-containing enzyme. The outcome of this reaction is 5,10 methylene tetrahydrofolate, which, in turn, is transformed into 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate via the enzyme tetrahydrofolate reductase, a vitamin B2-containing enzyme. The product 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate is the primary methyl donor for the reaction that remethylates, homocysteine into methionine. The latter reaction is catalyzed by the enzyme methionine synthase, which contains vitamin B12 as a co-factor. Methionine is then converted to s-adenosylmethionine, the DNMT cofactor and the universal methyl donor for all the biological methylation process inside mammalian cells including DNA methylation [2,50,51].
The negative feedback mechanism in this cycle is catalyzed by two enzymes, glycine N-methyltransferase that converts s-adenosylmethionine to s-adenosylhomocysteine and s-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase that converts s-adenosylhomocysteine to homocysteine [52]. This reaction is considered as a negative regulator of the DNA methylation process since s-adenosylhomocysteine binds to DNMTs with a higher affinity than s-adenosylmethionine resulting in an inhibition of the DNMT activity. The conversion of s-adenosylhomocysteine to homocysteine is a reversible chemical reaction, and accordingly high levels of homocysteine in the body are associated with reduced DNMT activity. This negative regulation of the “one-carbon metabolism” cycle is resolved by the re-methylation of homocysteine to methionine via the folate-dependent pathway or the diet-derived betaine or choline in the liver and kidney [53]. The alternative pathway for homocysteine metabolism is through transsulfuration to cystathionine, via cystathionine β-synthase. The latter is further metabolized to cysteine via the enzyme, cystathionase. Both reactions utilize the cofactor pyridoxal-5′-phosphate [54].
The “one-carbon metabolism” cycle is an example of how levels of nutrient exposure impact DNA methylation in the human body (Figure 2). In this example, nutrients either maintain or change the balance between s-adenosylmethionine and s-adenosylhomocysteine, which, in turn, regulate the availability of methyl donors and the activity of DNMTs [2]. There is a growing body of evidence indicating that nutrients, such as the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, or the soy isoflavone, genistein, are capable of inhibiting DNMT activity directly and competitively [49]. Furthermore, dietary supplements that have alpha-ketoglutarate may affect the activity of the active demethylation enzymes, TETs [55]. In the current review, we will discuss reported studies and observations for the mechanism and role of dietary methyl donors in modifying DNA methylation and subsequently cancer risk or progression. These studies are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2.

5. Micronutrients and DNA Methylation and Their Impact on Cancer

5.1. Folate

Folate naturally occurs in a wide variety of foods. Rich sources include leafy green vegetables, beans, peas, lentils, fruits like lemons, bananas, and melons, and fortified and enriched products, such as breads and cereals [112]. Folate is essential for several biological cell processes such as DNA synthesis and methylation, production and maintenance of new cells, and amino acid metabolism [50]. In several studies, folate supplementation has been shown to increase DNA methylation. For example, in a clinical trial conducted by Wallace et al. [56], folate supplementation increased DNA methylation of two proto-oncogenes in colorectal mucosa, estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α) and secreted frizzled-related protein-1 (SFRP-1). Similarly, in an in vitro model of neuroblastoma cells, Li et al. [113] have shown that treatments with folic acid (20 and 40 mmol/L) increased s-adenosylmethionine to s-adenosylhomocysteine ratio and subsequently downregulated the abnormally phosphorylated tau protein by inhibiting the demethylation of its regulator, PP2A (protein phosphatase 2A). Additionally, animal studies suggest that folate deficiency or supplementation modifies the methylation status of DNA promoter in genes that are critical in carcinogenesis. Folate-rich diet increased DNA methylation of genes such as p16 [114] in mouse colon and protooncogenes such as PDGF-B (platelet-derived growth factor-B), Ras (rat sarcoma), and survivin in a mouse model of gliomagenesis [115].
Conflicting results regarding the effect of folate status on DNA methylation have been reported. For example, global DNA hypomethylation was reported in three different murine studies in response to either a folate-deficient or a folate-rich diet provided during gestation, lactation, or after weaning [116,117,118]. Another study showed that a folate-deficient diet reduced tumor size in a colorectal cancer mouse model with no effect on global or gene-specific DNA methylation. However, this reduction in tumor size was only observed when the folate-deficient diet was administered after tumor development, and no effect was observed when folate deficiency was induced before tumor development [119]. In a study by Kotsopoulos et al. [120], folate-deficient diet increased DNA methylation in rat liver when administered post weaning and this effect continued through adulthood; no changes in DNA methylation were observed when either a folate-deficient or a folate-rich diet was administered at puberty. These findings may suggest that the dietary level of folate is not the only determinant for DNA methylation status and that other confounding factors might modulate the role of folate as a methyl donor.
Similarly, data from human studies that assessed the contribution of folate deficiency or folate supplementation on cancer risk or progression is inconsistent and varies significantly based on factors such as folate dose, mode of intake (dietary versus supplementary), stage of development during exposure (prenatal versus postnatal), and the pathological status (normal versus neoplastic) of tissues [121,122,123,124]. Other factors such as age, genetic and epigenetic background, alcohol intake, and comorbidities might influence the outcome in folate consumers [125,126].
Global DNA hypomethylation and gene-specific hypermethylation are significant characteristics of some cancers such as colorectal and prostate cancer and reversing these epigenetic changes has been of great interest for cancer researchers [127,128]. Folate intake has been reported to correct global DNA hypomethylation and imprint proto-oncogenes such as H-Ras in patients with colorectal cancer [129]. In fact, several studies that investigated the effect of folate on cancer focused on colorectal cancer. For example, an observational study by Giovannucci et al. [83] reported an inverse association between high folate intake and the risk of colorectal adenoma in men and women from the Health Professional Follow-up Study and the Nurses’ Health Study, respectively. Furthermore, findings from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS) support the association between folate intake and reduced risk of colon cancer [84]. In this study, men who consumed more than 249 μg/day had a lower risk of colon cancer (Relative Risk (RR): 0.40). Similarly, a prospective study of 88,758 women reported reductions in colon cancer risk in women who consumed more than 400 μg/day (RR: 0.81), especially those with a family history of colon cancer (RR: 0.48) [85]. These findings were reproduced by Stevens et al. in 43,512 men and 56,011 women from the Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort. Folate intake was also shown to reduce prostate cancer risk in the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort [86].
However, conflicting evidence has emerged, indicating that the mechanisms associated with folate effect on DNA methylation are more complex than previously thought and confounded by other dietary, genetic, or tissue-related factors. For example, a prospective nested case-control study of 331 cases and 662 matched controls in the population-based Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study demonstrated an association between low plasma levels of folate and reduced risk of colon cancer [87]. This study concluded that low circulating levels of folate are protective against colon cancer. Findings from other epidemiological studies were inconsistent; only five out of seven prospective studies [84,88,89,90,91,92,130] and seven out of 11 case-control studies [93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,131,132] have reported a protective effect of folate intake against colon cancer. This discrepancy motivated researchers to conduct meta-analyses of published observational studies to provide an overall estimate of the association between folate intake and colorectal cancer risk. A meta-analysis by Sanjoaquin et al. [133] indicated that dietary folate has a more protective effect on colorectal cancer than supplemental folate. However, confounding factors such as gender, other dietary factors, and alcohol consumption modify the association. A relatively recent meta-analysis reported a lack of association between folate supplementation and total cancer incidence including colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, or breast cancer [134]. Observational studies that assessed the association between folate status and global DNA hypomethylation in cancer patients have also yielded mixed findings. An association between global DNA hypomethylation and increased risk of colon, cervical, and bladder cancer was established in these studies [57,58,59]. However, a role of low folate status (intake or blood levels) in this association could not be consistently found. A significant association between folate status and DNA hypomethylation was reported by Piyathilake et al. [60] in their study of 376 women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Other studies reported either a weak [61] or null association [58,59].
This inconsistency extended to clinical trials. For example, in a randomized clinical trial, folate supplements (600 μg/day) for two years significantly increased tissue folate and global DNA methylation in twenty post-polypectomy Patients [62]. Similar results were obtained in other clinical trials where folate was administered by patients with colorectal adenoma or carcinoma for shorter periods (3–6 months) [61,63,64,135]. On the other hand, a randomized clinical trial by Cole et al. [102] demonstrated that daily folic acid supplementation (1mg/day) for three to five years did not reduce the risk of adenoma recurrence in 1021 men and women diagnosed with colorectal adenoma. Furthermore, a combined analysis of participants from two randomized clinical trials (Norwegian Vitamin Trial and Western Norway B Vitamin Intervention Trial) demonstrated significant increases in lung cancer risk in participants who administered folic acid (800 μg/day) and vitamin B12 (400 μg/day) [103]. It is worth mentioning that folate doses in these two studies were twice the recommended daily folate intake (400 μg/day) provided in the Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) [136] suggesting a biphasic dose-dependent response to folate intake. This assumption is supported by a dose-response meta-analysis by Zhang et al. [137] where a J-shaped correlation between folate intake and breast cancer risk was found. In this meta-analysis, women who consumed 200–320 μg/day were at a lower risk of developing breast cancer; however, women who consumed more than 400 μg/day had a significantly higher breast cancer risk.
Thus far, studies that measured the association between folate intake and global DNA methylation in cancer have yielded inconsistent results as shown above. This inconsistency could be related to the use of varying doses over varying periods; however, a critical confounding factor that should be considered is the type of methylation assays that were used and what they actually measure [138]. Some of these assays measure DNA methylation status in repetitive elements such as LINE (Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element 1), SINE (Short interspersed nuclear elements), and Alu ( Arthrobacter luteus restriction endonuclease) repeats and others examine differentially methylated regions via methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes [139]. Furthermore, some of the assays cover the whole genome while others cover only a certain percentage of the genome [138]. These assays, in general, have different sensitivity and specificity and are prone to over- or under-estimation errors. Details about global DNA methylation analysis methods are beyond the scope of the current review; the reader is directed to a recent article by Kurdyukov et al. [140] that summarizes and compare these methods in terms of outcomes and appropriateness for specific research questions. However, it is worth mentioning that the correlation among these assays is poor, which could mainly be attributed to the fact that they measure different subsets of DNA sequences in diverse regions of the genome [141]. Distinct methylation profiles of various repetitive DNA elements have been found among different tissues and pathological conditions. Furthermore, loss of DNA integrity in cancer may compromise the accuracy of global DNA methylation assay outcome [142]. Thus, using different global DNA methylation assays to evaluate the effect of folate status on DNA methylation could be the reason behind the reported inconsistent and irreproducible findings.
Compared with global DNA methylation, gene-specific methylation analyses in response to folate status have demonstrated more consistent findings. A study by Wallace et al. [56] assessed DNA methylation at specific CPG sites in estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α) and secreted frizzled-related protein-1 (SFRP1) in patients with previous colorectal adenomas who administered folate supplements for three years. In this study, higher levels of folate were associated with higher methylation in the CpG-rich promoters of ER-α and SFRP1; the expression of which has been correlated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer [143,144]. Similarly, promoter methylation of RASSF1A, a proto-oncogene, correlated positively with serum folate concentration in nested cases with malignancies and controls from a prospective study with reported dietary habits and lifestyles [67].
Together, these data suggest that folate might be protective against some cancers via inducing promoter methylation of proto-oncogenes; however, different genes and CpG sites are not equally susceptible to DNA methylation changes in response to folate intake. Accordingly, studies that utilize a candidate gene-specific analysis to investigate the effects of folate on DNA methylation are expected to produce more accurate results than global methylation studies. Furthermore, studies that examine thousands of CpG loci simultaneously will help elucidate the interaction between DNA methylation and folate intake. These studies should take into consideration modifying factors such as age, gender, genetic background, time of exposure (pre-cancer versus post-cancer development), mode of exposure (dietary versus supplemental), and other dietary habits and lifestyles.

5.2. Riboflavin, Pyridoxine, and Cobalamin

B vitamins are water-soluble vitamins That are found in a variety of foods such as meat, wholegrains, eggs, dairy products, legumes, nuts, dark leafy vegetables, and fruits (citrus fruits, avocados, and bananas) [136]. There are several types of vitamin B including thiamin (vitamin B1), riboflavin (vitamin B2), niacin (vitamin B3), pantothenic acid, vitamin B6, biotin (vitamin B7), and vitamin B12. While all types of vitamins B are essential in regulating metabolism, hemoglobin synthesis, and maintaining skin and nervous system integrity, vitamins B2, B3, B6 and B12 are specifically critical for one carbon metabolism [145]. Accordingly, the intake of these vitamins may induce DNA methylation and gene expression changes and modify the risk of diseases where DNA methylation play an important role such as cancer. In support of this notion, increased intake of vitamins B2, B6, and B12 by humans have been shown to inversely correlate with cancers such as esophageal cancer [146], cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [76], colorectal cancer [104], and prostate cancer [105]. However, the association between vitamin B levels or administration and DNA methylation was only reported in a few studies that measured the joint effect of vitamin B and folic acid status or included vitamin B in a combined model of other vitamins and micronutrients. Animal studies showed that vitamin B12 deprivation induced global hypomethylation even when combined with a folate-rich diet, which emphasizes the crucial role of vitamin B12 in catalyzing one-carbon metabolism and DNA methylation [147]. This and other animal studies referred to the importance of maintaining a balance between folate and Vitamin B12 in order to preserve physiological DNA methylation patterns [148].
In examining the relationship between vitamin B12 levels and homocysteine levels in the blood, several human studies have reported an inverse association [149,150]. Furthermore, Vitamin B6 and B12 intake was effective in reducing circulating levels of homocysteine [151,152]. These findings along with the one-carbon metabolism pathway we discussed above suggest that B vitamins contribute toward DNA hypermethylation. Nonetheless, studies that reported an association between vitamin B intake and the reduced risk of cancer are inconsistent to whether this protective effect is associated with an induced hypo- or hypermethylation either globally or at the candidate gene level. For example, in a study by Colacino et al. [72], a methylation score for several tumor suppressor genes was calculated and correlated with dietary intake of micronutrients in patients with head and neck cancer. In this study, individuals with the highest quartile of vitamin B12 intake showed significantly less tumor suppressor gene methylation compared with those in the lowest quartile. Additionally, two observational studies have shown that levels of vitamin B12 correlated with global DNA hypomethylation in lung and breast cancer tissues [73,153]. Furthermore, findings that provide minimal to no support of the assumed effect of vitamin B on DNA methylation have been reported. For example, in two separate studies, a lack of any significant changes or correlations between LINE-1 repetitive element methylation and vitamin B levels or supplementations in school-age children or elderly was reported [74,75].

5.3. Choline and Betaine

Choline is an essential nutrient that acts as an indirect methyl donor and is involved in several physiological processes such as methylation reactions, cellular membrane integrity, neurotransmitter synthesis, and metabolism [154]. The human body is capable of synthesizing choline in a minimal amount that is not enough to meet the body needs [155]. Thus, the primary source of choline is dietary including fish, poultry, eggs, cruciferous vegetables, and dairy products. The daily recommended intake of choline is 425 and 550 mg for women and men, respectively [136]. Betaine can be obtained from dietary sources or formed inside the body through irreversible oxidation of choline [156]. Betaine is a direct methyl donor; it donates a methyl group to homocysteine resulting in its conversion to methionine [157]. The role of betaine in the methylation process becomes more crucial under conditions of folate deficiency such as excessive alcohol consumption that impairs folate metabolism and interferes with folate-dependent methylation [158,159].
Several studies reported inverse correlations between dietary choline or betaine intake or their plasma levels and homocysteine bioavailability in humans. Melse-Boonstra et al. [160], reported that plasma levels of betaine are significant determinants of fasting homocysteine levels in healthy humans. Cross-Sectional analysis in 1477 women by Chiuve et al. [78], reported lower homocysteine levels in the highest quintile of total betaine and choline intake compared to the lowest quintile. These inverse associations were more pronounced in women who had low folate or high alcohol intake. Similarly, in a study by Lee et al. [161], the association between choline and betaine intake and fasting homocysteine concentrations were evaluated in 1325 males and 1407 females who participated in the Framingham Offspring Study. In this study, higher choline and betaine intakes were associated with lower homocysteine, especially in participants with low plasma levels of folate and vitamin B12. This association was no longer detected in the post-fortification period where most of the products in the United States were fortified with folic acid (140 g folic acid/100 g flour per grain).
In addition to these observational studies, supplementation with either betaine or choline has been shown to reduce homocysteine concentrations in clinical trials. For example, a study by Brouwer et al. [162], reported significant reductions in plasma total homocysteine in 15 healthy participants who administered six grams of anhydrous betaine daily for three weeks. Similar findings were observed in obese subjects who administered betaine (6 g/day) for 12 weeks [79] and healthy men who ingested phosphatidylcholine (2.6 g/day) for two weeks [80]. Doses of betaine and choline that were used in these short-term interventions are much higher than the recommended daily intake we referred to above. Accordingly, further trials that utilize comparable doses to regular daily consumptions are recommended.
Since choline and betaine can act as methyl donors and modify the bioavailability of homocysteine, several studies, mostly animal-based, investigated the association between choline and betaine status and global and candidate gene methylation [3]. Analyses of global and gene-specific DNA methylation in rodent offspring exposed to maternal choline-deficient diet demonstrated global hypomethylation and prompter hypomethylation of CDKN3 (cyclin-dependent kinase 3) [163] calbindin1 [164], VEGF-C (vascular endothelial growth factor-C) and ANGPT2 (angiopoietin 2) genes [165]. Interestingly, in a study by Kovacheva et al. [166], global hypomethylation and gene-specific hypermethylation (insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF-2)), were observed in rodent offspring exposed to maternal choline-deficient diet. In this study, a concomitant hypomethylation was observed in DNMT1 promoter. These data suggest an early effect of choline deficiency where the lack of methyl groups and impaired one-carbon metabolism result in global hypomethylation that encompasses DNMT1 promoter. This is followed by a phase where the augmented DNMT1 expression subsequently increases DNA methylation at specific gene loci such as IGF-2. This assumption necessitates further investigations; however, if proven right, it may explain the encountered discrepancy among studies that investigated the association between methyl-donating nutrients and DNA methylation status. In this case, factors such as the duration of nutrient intake should be taken into consideration.
Secondary to their role in modifying DNA methylation, choline and betaine status is associated with carcinogenesis [167]. Low choline diet increased levels of S-adenosylhomocysteine in rodents’ livers, reduced DNMT activity, and DNA methylation, and increased the incidence of developing hepatocellular carcinoma [168,169]. While some oncogenes such as c-myc were hypomethylated in this low choline-diet rodent model, the promoter of some tumor suppressor genes such as p53, p16INK4a, PtprO, Cdh1, and Cx26 was hypermethylated [170,171,172]. In support of the role of betaine and choline in protecting against hepatocellular carcinoma, Lupu et al., [173] reported that, in a mouse model, the deletion of betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase gene, which is implicated in choline metabolism resulted in the spontaneous elevation of S-adenosylhomocysteine levels and development of preneoplastic foci in the liver.
In human studies, four case-control studies demonstrated an inverse relationship between choline and betaine intake and the risk of developing breast cancer [106], colon cancer [107], nasopharyngeal cancer [108], and liver cancer [109]. Interestingly, in a nested case-control study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, a significant inverse association between plasma levels of betaine and colorectal cancer risk was observed only in participants with low folate concentrations [110] suggesting that choline and betaine may serve as alternative methyl group donors in states of folate deficiency. A meta-analysis of 11 epidemiological studies supported the protective role of dietary betaine and choline against several types of cancer with the most considerable effect reported for breast cancer followed by nasopharyngeal and lung cancers [174]. In this meta-analysis, it was found that an increment in dietary betaine and choline of 100 mg/day reduced cancer incidence by 11%. In summary, cumulative evidence suggests a significant contribution of choline and betaine to methyl metabolism and DNA methylation and accordingly to gene regulation in carcinogenesis.

5.4. Methionine

Methionine is an essential sulfur-containing amino acid that plays a significant role in regulating metabolism and synthesizing other amino acids, such as cysteine and taurine, and proteins, such as carnitine and melatonin [175,176]. Methionine is not synthesized in the body and should be obtained from foods. While nearly all protein-containing foods have some methionine, eggs, fish, soy, dairy products, and some meats contain high amounts of this amino acid [177]. Methionine is an integral part of the one-carbon metabolism since it serves as a precursor for s-adenosylmethionine, the universal methyl donor for DNA methylation [178]. Thus, dietary intake of methionine is expected to correlate with DNA methylation. However, due to the cyclical nature of the one-carbon metabolism process, methionine excess may have a negative impact on DNA methylation via inhibiting homocysteine methylation to maintain a balance between s-adenosylhomocysteine and s-adenosylmethionine [179,180]. Indeed, there is limited evidence suggesting that dietary methionine induces gene-specific DNA hypermethylation [181]. Furthermore, the effect of methionine is tissue-specific, and studies that measured the correlation between methionine intake and plasma s-adenosyl methionine to s-adenosyl homocysteine ratio have yielded inconsistent findings. For example, three animal studies that have examined the effects of dietary methionine intakes on hepatic levels of methionine, s-adenosyl methionine and s-adenosyl homocysteine demonstrated a significant discrepancy. Finkelstein and Martin [179] reported a lack of induction of hepatic methionine and reduction in the s-adenosyl methionine to s-adenosyl homocysteine ratio in response to methionine-rich diet intake for seven days. In their study, Regina et al. [180] demonstrated a 20-fold increase in hepatic and plasma methionine and 80% increase in the s-adenosyl methionine to s-adenosyl homocysteine ratio in rats fed methionine-rich diet for 14 days. In this study, a lack of increase in the s-adenosyl methionine was observed in the kidney, small intestine, and skeletal muscle. Lastly, Rowling et al. [182] observed an eight-fold increase in hepatic s-adenosyl methionine to s-adenosyl homocysteine ratio in rats fed methionine diet for 10 days. The observed inconsistencies among these studies indicate the complex nature of the effect of methionine that might vary among different tissues and might depend on several factors related to age or duration of exposure.
These contradictory effects might explain the lack of robust correlations between methionine intake and DNA hypermethylation. For example, rats fed a methionine-rich diet showed no changes in p53 [183] or cystathionine beta-synthase promoter methylation [184]. Similarly, in human studies, methionine was associated with decreased methylation levels of RASSF1A, a gene that is implicated in several malignancies [67]. Despite this lack of association between dietary methionine and DNA hypermethylation at the gene level, a positive association at the global level has been observed in mouse gut [185]. In general, there is an evident lack in human studies that measured the effect of dietary methionine on DNA methylation and whether high dietary methionine intake induces DNA hyper- or hypomethylation is still to be determined. Moreover, epidemiologic findings as to whether dietary methionine intake protects against cancer in humans are inconsistent [186]. Higher dietary methionine intake was associated with increased prostate cancer risk (OR = 2.1; 95% CI 1.1–3.9) in men with low Gleason score [187] and failed to demonstrate any association with breast cancer risk in the American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort [111]. Additionally, several ongoing studies are exploiting dietary methionine restriction as a potentiator for the effect of cancer chemotherapy regimen in metastatic cancer [188,189,190], melanoma, and glioma [191]. On the other hand, a meta-analysis of eight prospective studies that measured the association between dietary methionine intake and risk of colon cancer in 431,029 participants reported a summary relative risks (RRs) of 0.77 (95% CI = 0.64–0.92) for the highest versus lowest methionine intake [186]. Additionally, in a dose-response meta-analysis, a linear dose-response relationship was found between methionine intake and the risk of breast cancer; the risk was reduced by 4% for every 1 gram per day increment in dietary methionine intake [192]. In summary, the available findings to date support the need for further investigations to elucidate the direction of the association between dietary methionine and cancer risk and highlight the underlying molecular and epigenetic mechanisms for this potential association.

5.5. The Impact of Alcohol and Smoking on Nutrient-Mediated DNA Methylation

Chronic alcohol consumption was a strong predictor of the association between methyl donor nutrient deficiency and the disturbed one-carbon metabolism in several human studies [78,133,158,159,161]. Alcohol has been shown to inhibit methionine synthase activity in the liver resulting in a significant reduction in s-adenosyl methionine levels. Alcohol administration in rodents resulted in a significant decrease in liver concentrations of s-adenosyl methionine and DNA methylation [193]. Additionally, cancer related genes such as c-myc showed increased expression that was accompanied by increased risk of alcoholic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in mice [194,195]. Similarly, tobacco smoke interferes with the one-carbon metabolism and subsequently with the availability of methyl groups required for DNA methylation [196,197,198]. Smoking was also a strong predictor for the association between vitamin B6 and B12 and methylation for several multi-disease-related gene promoters in humans [67]. Additionally, previous cross sectional studies demonstrated that hydrocarbons from tobacco smoke are capable of interacting with vitamin B12 and folic acid resulting in their biological inactivity [199].

5.6. The Impact of Early Nutrition in Modulating DNA Methylation

There is growing evidence that maternal nutrition during pregnancy and early postnatal period affects epigenetic profiles of their offspring [200]. Several animal studies reported changes in global and gene-specific DNA methylation in the progeny of animals fed low-protein diet [201,202], caloric-restriction diet [203], or high-fat diet [204,205]. These studies suggest that prenatal or early postnatal periods are critical for the establishment of the epigenome and vulnerable to environmental factors such as nutrition. In support of this assumption, choline supplementation in a maternal murine model modified methionine metabolism genes and global DNA methylation in the offspring [206].
Human studies also supported this assumption and a role of maternal diet in modifying fetal DNA methylation of growth and metabolic genes has been shown in individuals exposed prenatally to famine, and conceivably extreme folate deficiency, during the Dutch Hunger Winter at the end of World War II [207,208]. This association was also supported by Steegers-Theunissen et al. [209], where maternal use of folic acid periconceptually resulted in 4.5% increase in IGF2 methylation and reduced birth weight in children compared to those born to women who had not taken folic acid. Additionally, a study by Ba et al. [69], showed that IGF2 methylation in fetal blood was positively associated with vitamin B12 levels in maternal blood.
Positive associations were observed in the Maternal Nutrition and Offspring’s Epigenome (MANOE) study for maternal intake of betaine and folate and gene-specific DNA methylation in infants, mainly RXRA (retinoid X receptor alpha) gene [210]. Furthermore, the MANOE study demonstrated a time trend for the relationship between methyl donor intake and DNA methylation in pregnant women where women with higher methyl-group intake exhibited higher methylation in the third trimester, and not in the first two semesters [77]. This time-sensitive relationship between methyl donors and DNA methylation in pregnant women might be reflected on their infants’ epigenetic patterns. However, further studies are warranted to investigate this assumption.
In summary, these studies showed the possibility that methyl donor nutrients in the maternal diet could induce DNA methylation levels in the offspring. However, null, even inverse, associations between maternal methyl donor nutrient intake and fetal global or gene-specific DNA methylation have been reported in other clinical studies [70,211,212]. Therefore, recent studies have reported concerns regarding maternal supplementations of folic acid basing their argument on the demonstrated unexpected alterations in normal fetal DNA methylation that could induce detrimental effects [213,214,215,216]. Indeed, the relationship between methyl donors and DNA methylation is complex and may involve other factors such as other dietary components or health status. Accordingly, definitive linear associations of maternal methyl donor intake with fetal DNA methylation could not be confirmed. Furthermore, dietary versus supplemental intake of methyl donors could be a source of inconsistent outcomes. For example, while folic acid deficiency has been clearly shown to be associated with adverse health outcomes, high folate concentrations due to supplementation correlated to mixed outcomes as we summarized above. Accordingly, the currently available evidence is insufficient to determine whether methyl donor supplementation during pregnancy or early postnatal would induce favorable or unfavorable epigenetic effects on the offspring.

6. Perspectives of Nutritional Modification of DNA Methylation

Nutrients can regulate several biological processes in our body via modifying epigenetic mechanisms that are critical for gene expression such as DNA methylation. These epigenetic modifications may contribute to the status of our health or the health of our offspring. This dynamic interaction between nutrients we consume throughout our lifetime and our epigenetic signature has now been identified as Nutri-epigenomics. In the current review, we summarized the current literature that reported findings and concepts related to the influence of direct and indirect methyl donor nutrients on DNA methylation and cancer risk. Despite the promising insight Nutri-epigenomics could provide for how to target health from a nutritional standpoint, our knowledge in this topic is still limited and mostly animal-based. Data related to human consumption of methyl donor nutrients were mostly collected from observational studies that are inherently prone to inaccuracy and recall bias. DNA methylation status was assessed by either global methylation approach that lacks a robust clinical relevance or candidate gene-driven approach with limited genome coverage and sensitivity. Further studies in human subjects utilizing sensitive, high-throughput quantitative technologies with a broader range of coverage to systemically analyze the role of methyl donors in modifying DNA methylation and subsequently cancer risk or progression are required. Future work is needed to understand better the interactions among methyl donors involved in one-carbon metabolism and strengthen our understanding of their biological role in health and disease states. The fact that epigenetic marks are potentially reversible and sensitive for nutritional supplementation or pharmaceutical therapies makes the subject of Nutri-epigenomics very attractive, promising, and worthy of study. Yet, we must acknowledge the complexity of the interaction between nutrients and DNA methylation, which is not indicative of a single nutrient. Instead, DNA methylation is a highly regulated process that is gene-sensitive and tissue-dependent and reflects the outcome of several pathobiological processes and environmental exposures. Accordingly, future research should be designed in a way that dissects the effect of single versus combined intake of methyl donors, dietary versus supplementary mode of intake, and dose response relationship. Furthermore, researchers should consider the differential response to methyl donors between healthy tissues and cancerous lesions where aberrant methylation profiles might exist and modify the outcome. Finally, large scale clinical trials in both healthy people and cancer patients are needed in order to provide specific recommendations for methyl donor intake that maintains normal methylation profiles in each group.

Author Contributions

A.M.M.: Conceptualization, editing, and reviewing final draft. M.M.A.: Conceptualization, editing, and reviewing final draft.

Funding

This research and the APC were funded by the National Institute of Health grant number 1K99HL140049-01 (AMM).

Acknowledgments

This review article was supported by the following funding source: NIH 1K99HL140049-01 (AMM).

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  1. Biswas, S.; Rao, C.M. Epigenetics in cancer: Fundamentals and beyond. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 173, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ducker, G.S.; Rabinowitz, J.D. One-carbon metabolism in health and disease. Cell Metab. 2017, 25, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zeisel, S. Choline, other methyl-donors and epigenetics. Nutrients 2017, 9, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jung, M.; Pfeifer, G.P. Aging and DNA methylation. BMC Biol. 2015, 13, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lillycrop, K.A.; Burdge, G.C. Epigenetic mechanisms linking early nutrition to long term health. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 26, 667–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Klutstein, M.; Nejman, D.; Greenfield, R.; Cedar, H. DNA methylation in cancer and aging. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 3446–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kulis, M.; Queiros, A.C.; Beekman, R.; Martin-Subero, J.I. Intragenic DNA methylation in transcriptional regulation, normal differentiation and cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1829, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bakshi, A.; Bretz, C.L.; Cain, T.L.; Kim, J. Intergenic and intronic DNA hypomethylated regions as putative regulators of imprinted domains. Epigenomics 2018, 10, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lyko, F. The DNA methyltransferase family: A versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rhee, I.; Bachman, K.E.; Park, B.H.; Jair, K.W.; Yen, R.W.; Schuebel, K.E.; Cui, H.; Feinberg, A.P.; Lengauer, C.; Kinzler, K.W.; et al. Dnmt1 and dnmt3b cooperate to silence genes in human cancer cells. Nature 2002, 416, 552–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Leu, Y.W.; Rahmatpanah, F.; Shi, H.; Wei, S.H.; Liu, J.C.; Yan, P.S.; Huang, T.H. Double rna interference of dnmt3b and dnmt1 enhances DNA demethylation and gene reactivation. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 6110–6115. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sowinska, A.; Jagodzinski, P.P. Rna interference-mediated knockdown of dnmt1 and dnmt3b induces cxcl12 expression in mcf-7 breast cancer and aspc1 pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2007, 255, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liang, G.; Chan, M.F.; Tomigahara, Y.; Tsai, Y.C.; Gonzales, F.A.; Li, E.; Laird, P.W.; Jones, P.A. Cooperativity between DNA methyltransferases in the maintenance methylation of repetitive elements. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 22, 480–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fatemi, M.; Hermann, A.; Gowher, H.; Jeltsch, A. Dnmt3a and dnmt1 functionally cooperate during de novo methylation of DNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 4981–4984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lorincz, M.C.; Schubeler, D.; Hutchinson, S.R.; Dickerson, D.R.; Groudine, M. DNA methylation density influences the stability of an epigenetic imprint and dnmt3a/b-independent de novo methylation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 22, 7572–7580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pradhan, S.; Bacolla, A.; Wells, R.D.; Roberts, R.J. Recombinant human DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferase. I. Expression, purification, and comparison of de novo and maintenance methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 33002–33010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moore, L.D.; Le, T.; Fan, G. DNA methylation and its basic function. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013, 38, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hervouet, E.; Peixoto, P.; Delage-Mourroux, R.; Boyer-Guittaut, M.; Cartron, P.F. Specific or not specific recruitment of dnmts for DNA methylation, an epigenetic dilemma. Clin. Epigenetics 2018, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kohli, R.M.; Zhang, Y. Tet enzymes, tdg and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature 2013, 502, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pidugu, L.S.; Flowers, J.W.; Coey, C.T.; Pozharski, E.; Greenberg, M.M.; Drohat, A.C. Structural basis for excision of 5-formylcytosine by thymine DNA glycosylase. Biochemistry 2016, 55, 6205–6208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Williams, K.; Christensen, J.; Pedersen, M.T.; Johansen, J.V.; Cloos, P.A.; Rappsilber, J.; Helin, K. Tet1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature 2011, 473, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schuermann, D.; Weber, A.R.; Schar, P. Active DNA demethylation by DNA repair: Facts and uncertainties. DNA Repair 2016, 44, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kanwal, R.; Gupta, S. Epigenetic modifications in cancer. Clin. Genet. 2012, 81, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pan, Y.; Liu, G.; Zhou, F.; Su, B.; Li, Y. DNA methylation profiles in cancer diagnosis and therapeutics. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 18, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qi, M.; Xiong, X. Promoter hypermethylation of rarbeta2, dapk, hmlh1, p14, and p15 is associated with progression of breast cancer: A prisma-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine 2018, 97, e13666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yamashita, K.; Hosoda, K.; Nishizawa, N.; Katoh, H.; Watanabe, M. Epigenetic biomarkers of promoter DNA methylation in the new era of cancer treatment. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 3695–3706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rahmani, M.; Talebi, M.; Hagh, M.F.; Feizi, A.A.H.; Solali, S. Aberrant DNA methylation of key genes and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 97, 1493–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lasseigne, B.N.; Brooks, J.D. The role of DNA methylation in renal cell carcinoma. Mol. Diagn. Ther. 2018, 22, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mekky, M.A.; Salama, R.H.; Abdel-Aal, M.F.; Ghaliony, M.A.; Zaky, S. Studying the frequency of aberrant DNA methylation of apc, p14, and e-cadherin genes in hcv-related hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Biomark. 2018, 22, 503–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Curtis, C.D.; Goggins, M. DNA methylation analysis in human cancer. Methods Mol. Med. 2005, 103, 123–136. [Google Scholar]
  31. Esteller, M. Cancer epigenetics: DNA methylation and chromatin alterations in human cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2003, 532, 39–49. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sproul, D.; Meehan, R.R. Genomic insights into cancer-associated aberrant cpg island hypermethylation. Brief. Funct. Genom. 2013, 12, 174–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Estecio, M.R.; Issa, J.P. Dissecting DNA hypermethylation in cancer. FEBS Lett. 2011, 585, 2078–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ashktorab, H.; Brim, H. DNA methylation and colorectal cancer. Curr. Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2014, 10, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Funaki, S.; Nakamura, T.; Nakatani, T.; Umehara, H.; Nakashima, H.; Okumura, M.; Oboki, K.; Matsumoto, K.; Saito, H.; Nakano, T. Global DNA hypomethylation coupled to cellular transformation and metastatic ability. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 4053–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kisseljova, N.P.; Kisseljov, F.L. DNA demethylation and carcinogenesis. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2005, 70, 743–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Song, C.X.; He, C. Balance of DNA methylation and demethylation in cancer development. Genome Biol. 2012, 13, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ghobadi, A.; Choi, J.; Fiala, M.A.; Fletcher, T.; Liu, J.; Eissenberg, L.G.; Abboud, C.; Cashen, A.; Vij, R.; Schroeder, M.A.; et al. Phase i study of azacitidine following donor lymphocyte infusion for relapsed acute myeloid leukemia post allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Leuk. Res. 2016, 49, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Harman, R.M.; Curtis, T.M.; Argyle, D.J.; Coonrod, S.A.; Van de Walle, G.R. A comparative study on the in vitro effects of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine (5-azac) in breast/mammary cancer of different mammalian species. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2016, 21, 51–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.M.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Evers, B.M. Effects of 5-azacytidine and butyrate on differentiation and apoptosis of hepatic cancer cell lines. Ann. Surg. 1998, 227, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuykendall, J.R. 5-azacytidine and decitabine monotherapies of myelodysplastic disorders. Ann. Pharmacother. 2005, 39, 1700–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shin, T.H.; Paterson, A.J.; Grant, J.H., 3rd; Meluch, A.A.; Kudlow, J.E. 5-azacytidine treatment of ha-a melanoma cells induces sp1 activity and concomitant transforming growth factor alpha expression. Mol. Cell Biol. 1992, 12, 3998–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sapienza, C.; Issa, J.P. Diet, nutrition, and cancer epigenetics. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2016, 36, 665–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kadayifci, F.Z.; Zheng, S.; Pan, Y.X. Molecular mechanisms underlying the link between diet and DNA methylation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Park, J.H.; Yoo, Y.; Park, Y.J. Epigenetics: Linking nutrition to molecular mechanisms in aging. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2017, 22, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  46. de Luca, A.; Hankard, R.; Borys, J.M.; Sinnett, D.; Marcil, V.; Levy, E. Nutriepigenomics and malnutrition. Epigenomics 2017, 9, 893–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Remely, M.; Stefanska, B.; Lovrecic, L.; Magnet, U.; Haslberger, A.G. Nutriepigenomics: The role of nutrition in epigenetic control of human diseases. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2015, 18, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Friso, S.; Udali, S.; De Santis, D.; Choi, S.W. One-carbon metabolism and epigenetics. Mol. Asp. Med. 2017, 54, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Anderson, O.S.; Sant, K.E.; Dolinoy, D.C. Nutrition and epigenetics: An interplay of dietary methyl donors, one-carbon metabolism and DNA methylation. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012, 23, 853–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mentch, S.J.; Locasale, J.W. One-carbon metabolism and epigenetics: Understanding the specificity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2016, 1363, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kandi, V.; Vadakedath, S. Effect of DNA methylation in various diseases and the probable protective role of nutrition: A mini-review. Cureus 2015, 7, e309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liteplo, R.G. DNA (cytosine) methylation in murine and human tumor cell lines treated with s-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors. Cancer Lett. 1988, 39, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Soda, K. Polyamine metabolism and gene methylation in conjunction with one-carbon metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Selhub, J. Homocysteine metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1999, 19, 217–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tamanaha, E.; Guan, S.; Marks, K.; Saleh, L. Distributive processing by the iron(ii)/alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent catalytic domains of the tet enzymes is consistent with epigenetic roles for oxidized 5-methylcytosine bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9345–9348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wallace, K.; Grau, M.V.; Levine, A.J.; Shen, L.; Hamdan, R.; Chen, X.; Gui, J.; Haile, R.W.; Barry, E.L.; Ahnen, D.; et al. Association between folate levels and cpg island hypermethylation in normal colorectal mucosa. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010, 3, 1552–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pufulete, M.; Al-Ghnaniem, R.; Leather, A.J.; Appleby, P.; Gout, S.; Terry, C.; Emery, P.W.; Sanders, T.A. Folate status, genomic DNA hypomethylation, and risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer: A case control study. Gastroenterology 2003, 124, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Piyathilake, C.J.; Azrad, M.; Jhala, D.; Macaluso, M.; Kabagambe, E.K.; Brill, I.; Niveleau, A.; Jhala, N.; Grizzle, W.E. Mandatory fortification with folic acid in the united states is not associated with changes in the degree or the pattern of global DNA methylation in cells involved in cervical carcinogenesis. Cancer Biomark. 2006, 2, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moore, L.E.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Poscablo, C.; Real, F.X.; Kogevinas, M.; Silverman, D.; Garcia-Closas, R.; Chanock, S.; Tardon, A.; Serra, C.; et al. Genomic DNA hypomethylation as a biomarker for bladder cancer susceptibility in the spanish bladder cancer study: A case-control study. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Piyathilake, C.J.; Macaluso, M.; Alvarez, R.D.; Chen, M.; Badiga, S.; Siddiqui, N.R.; Edberg, J.C.; Partridge, E.E.; Johanning, G.L. A higher degree of line-1 methylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, a one-carbon nutrient related epigenetic alteration, is associated with a lower risk of developing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Nutrition 2011, 27, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pufulete, M.; Al-Ghnaniem, R.; Rennie, J.A.; Appleby, P.; Harris, N.; Gout, S.; Emery, P.W.; Sanders, T.A. Influence of folate status on genomic DNA methylation in colonic mucosa of subjects without colorectal adenoma or cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 838–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. O’Reilly, S.L.; McGlynn, A.P.; McNulty, H.; Reynolds, J.; Wasson, G.R.; Molloy, A.M.; Strain, J.J.; Weir, D.G.; Ward, M.; McKerr, G.; et al. Folic acid supplementation in postpolypectomy patients in a randomized controlled trial increases tissue folate concentrations and reduces aberrant DNA biomarkers in colonic tissues adjacent to the former polyp site. J. Nutr. 2016, 146, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cravo, M.L.; Pinto, A.G.; Chaves, P.; Cruz, J.A.; Lage, P.; Nobre Leitao, C.; Costa Mira, F. Effect of folate supplementation on DNA methylation of rectal mucosa in patients with colonic adenomas: Correlation with nutrient intake. Clin. Nutr. 1998, 17, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kim, Y.I.; Baik, H.W.; Fawaz, K.; Knox, T.; Lee, Y.M.; Norton, R.; Libby, E.; Mason, J.B. Effects of folate supplementation on two provisional molecular markers of colon cancer: A prospective, randomized trial. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2001, 96, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Coppede, F.; Migheli, F.; Lopomo, A.; Failli, A.; Legitimo, A.; Consolini, R.; Fontanini, G.; Sensi, E.; Servadio, A.; Seccia, M.; et al. Gene promoter methylation in colorectal cancer and healthy adjacent mucosa specimens: Correlation with physiological and pathological characteristics, and with biomarkers of one-carbon metabolism. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Christensen, B.C.; Kelsey, K.T.; Zheng, S.; Houseman, E.A.; Marsit, C.J.; Wrensch, M.R.; Wiemels, J.L.; Nelson, H.H.; Karagas, M.R.; Kushi, L.H.; et al. Breast cancer DNA methylation profiles are associated with tumor size and alcohol and folate intake. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Vineis, P.; Chuang, S.C.; Vaissiere, T.; Cuenin, C.; Ricceri, F.; Genair, E.C.; Johansson, M.; Ueland, P.; Brennan, P.; Herceg, Z. DNA methylation changes associated with cancer risk factors and blood levels of vitamin metabolites in a prospective study. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. van Engeland, M.; Weijenberg, M.P.; Roemen, G.M.; Brink, M.; de Bruine, A.P.; Goldbohm, R.A.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Baylin, S.B.; de Goeij, A.F.; Herman, J.G. Effects of dietary folate and alcohol intake on promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal cancer: The netherlands cohort study on diet and cancer. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 3133–3137. [Google Scholar]
  69. Ba, Y.; Yu, H.; Liu, F.; Geng, X.; Zhu, C.; Zhu, Q.; Zheng, T.; Ma, S.; Wang, G.; Li, Z.; et al. Relationship of folate, vitamin b12 and methylation of insulin-like growth factor-ii in maternal and cord blood. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65, 480–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hoyo, C.; Murtha, A.P.; Schildkraut, J.M.; Jirtle, R.L.; Demark-Wahnefried, W.; Forman, M.R.; Iversen, E.S.; Kurtzberg, J.; Overcash, F.; Huang, Z.; et al. Methylation variation at igf2 differentially methylated regions and maternal folic acid use before and during pregnancy. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 928–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shelnutt, K.P.; Kauwell, G.P.; Gregory, J.F., 3rd; Maneval, D.R.; Quinlivan, E.P.; Theriaque, D.W.; Henderson, G.N.; Bailey, L.B. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677c-->t polymorphism affects DNA methylation in response to controlled folate intake in young women. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2004, 15, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Colacino, J.A.; Arthur, A.E.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Sartor, M.A.; Duffy, S.A.; Chepeha, D.B.; Bradford, C.R.; Walline, H.M.; McHugh, J.B.; D’Silva, N.; et al. Pretreatment dietary intake is associated with tumor suppressor DNA methylation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Epigenetics 2012, 7, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Piyathilake, C.J.; Johanning, G.L.; Macaluso, M.; Whiteside, M.; Oelschlager, D.K.; Heimburger, D.C.; Grizzle, W.E. Localized folate and vitamin b-12 deficiency in squamous cell lung cancer is associated with global DNA hypomethylation. Nutr. Cancer 2000, 37, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Perng, W.; Rozek, L.S.; Mora-Plazas, M.; Duchin, O.; Marin, C.; Forero, Y.; Baylin, A.; Villamor, E. Micronutrient status and global DNA methylation in school-age children. Epigenetics 2012, 7, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Hubner, U.; Geisel, J.; Kirsch, S.H.; Kruse, V.; Bodis, M.; Klein, C.; Herrmann, W.; Obeid, R. Effect of 1 year b and d vitamin supplementation on line-1 repetitive element methylation in older subjects. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2013, 51, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Piyathilake, C.J.; Macaluso, M.; Chambers, M.M.; Badiga, S.; Siddiqui, N.R.; Bell, W.C.; Edberg, J.C.; Partridge, E.E.; Alvarez, R.D.; Johanning, G.L. Folate and vitamin b12 may play a critical role in lowering the hpv 16 methylation-associated risk of developing higher grades of cin. Cancer Prev. Res. 2014, 7, 1128–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Pauwels, S.; Duca, R.C.; Devlieger, R.; Freson, K.; Straetmans, D.; Van Herck, E.; Huybrechts, I.; Koppen, G.; Godderis, L. Maternal methyl-group donor intake and global DNA (hydroxy)methylation before and during pregnancy. Nutrients 2016, 8, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chiuve, S.E.; Giovannucci, E.L.; Hankinson, S.E.; Zeisel, S.H.; Dougherty, L.W.; Willett, W.C.; Rimm, E.B. The association between betaine and choline intakes and the plasma concentrations of homocysteine in women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 86, 1073–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Schwab, U.; Torronen, A.; Toppinen, L.; Alfthan, G.; Saarinen, M.; Aro, A.; Uusitupa, M. Betaine supplementation decreases plasma homocysteine concentrations but does not affect body weight, body composition, or resting energy expenditure in human subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 76, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Olthof, M.R.; Brink, E.J.; Katan, M.B.; Verhoef, P. Choline supplemented as phosphatidylcholine decreases fasting and postmethionine-loading plasma homocysteine concentrations in healthy men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 82, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Perng, W.; Villamor, E.; Shroff, M.R.; Nettleton, J.A.; Pilsner, J.R.; Liu, Y.; Diez-Roux, A.V. Dietary intake, plasma homocysteine, and repetitive element DNA methylation in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (mesa). Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2014, 24, 614–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Tao, M.H.; Mason, J.B.; Marian, C.; McCann, S.E.; Platek, M.E.; Millen, A.; Ambrosone, C.; Edge, S.B.; Krishnan, S.S.; Trevisan, M.; et al. Promoter methylation of e-cadherin, p16, and rar-beta(2) genes in breast tumors and dietary intake of nutrients important in one-carbon metabolism. Nutr. Cancer 2011, 63, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Giovannucci, E.; Stampfer, M.J.; Colditz, G.A.; Rimm, E.B.; Trichopoulos, D.; Rosner, B.A.; Speizer, F.E.; Willett, W.C. Folate, methionine, and alcohol intake and risk of colorectal adenoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1993, 85, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Su, L.J.; Arab, L. Nutritional status of folate and colon cancer risk: Evidence from nhanes i epidemiologic follow-up study. Ann. Epidemiol. 2001, 11, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fuchs, C.S.; Willett, W.C.; Colditz, G.A.; Hunter, D.J.; Stampfer, M.J.; Speizer, F.E.; Giovannucci, E.L. The influence of folate and multivitamin use on the familial risk of colon cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002, 11, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  86. Stevens, V.L.; Rodriguez, C.; Pavluck, A.L.; McCullough, M.L.; Thun, M.J.; Calle, E.E. Folate nutrition and prostate cancer incidence in a large cohort of us men. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 163, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Gylling, B.; Van Guelpen, B.; Schneede, J.; Hultdin, J.; Ueland, P.M.; Hallmans, G.; Johansson, I.; Palmqvist, R. Low folate levels are associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer in a population with low folate status. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014, 23, 2136–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Giovannucci, E.; Stampfer, M.J.; Colditz, G.A.; Hunter, D.J.; Fuchs, C.; Rosner, B.A.; Speizer, F.E.; Willett, W.C. Multivitamin use, folate, and colon cancer in women in the nurses’ health study. Ann. Intern. Med. 1998, 129, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Konings, E.J.; Goldbohm, R.A.; Brants, H.A.; Saris, W.H.; van den Brandt, P.A. Intake of dietary folate vitamers and risk of colorectal carcinoma: Results from the netherlands cohort study. Cancer 2002, 95, 1421–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Terry, P.; Jain, M.; Miller, A.B.; Howe, G.R.; Rohan, T.E. Dietary intake of folic acid and colorectal cancer risk in a cohort of women. Int. J. Cancer 2002, 97, 864–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wei, E.K.; Giovannucci, E.; Wu, K.; Rosner, B.; Fuchs, C.S.; Willett, W.C.; Colditz, G.A. Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 108, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Harnack, L.; Jacobs, D.R., Jr.; Nicodemus, K.; Lazovich, D.; Anderson, K.; Folsom, A.R. Relationship of folate, vitamin b-6, vitamin b-12, and methionine intake to incidence of colorectal cancers. Nutr. Cancer 2002, 43, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Benito, E.; Stiggelbout, A.; Bosch, F.X.; Obrador, A.; Kaldor, J.; Mulet, M.; Munoz, N. Nutritional factors in colorectal cancer risk: A case-control study in majorca. Int. J. Cancer 1991, 49, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ferraroni, M.; La Vecchia, C.; D’Avanzo, B.; Negri, E.; Franceschi, S.; Decarli, A. Selected micronutrient intake and the risk of colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 1994, 70, 1150–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Freudenheim, J.L.; Graham, S.; Marshall, J.R.; Haughey, B.P.; Cholewinski, S.; Wilkinson, G. Folate intake and carcinogenesis of the colon and rectum. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1991, 20, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Glynn, S.A.; Albanes, D.; Pietinen, P.; Brown, C.C.; Rautalahti, M.; Tangrea, J.A.; Gunter, E.W.; Barrett, M.J.; Virtamo, J.; Taylor, P.R. Colorectal cancer and folate status: A nested case-control study among male smokers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1996, 5, 487–494. [Google Scholar]
  97. La Vecchia, C.; Braga, C.; Negri, E.; Franceschi, S.; Russo, A.; Conti, E.; Falcini, F.; Giacosa, A.; Montella, M.; Decarli, A. Intake of selected micronutrients and risk of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer 1997, 73, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Le Marchand, L.; Donlon, T.; Hankin, J.H.; Kolonel, L.N.; Wilkens, L.R.; Seifried, A. B-vitamin intake, metabolic genes, and colorectal cancer risk (united states). Cancer Causes Control. 2002, 13, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Levi, F.; Pasche, C.; Lucchini, F.; La Vecchia, C. Selected micronutrients and colorectal cancer. A case-control study from the canton of vaud, switzerland. Eur. J. Cancer 2000, 36, 2115–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Boutron-Ruault, M.C.; Senesse, P.; Faivre, J.; Couillault, C.; Belghiti, C. Folate and alcohol intakes: Related or independent roles in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence? Nutr. Cancer 1996, 26, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kato, I.; Dnistrian, A.M.; Schwartz, M.; Toniolo, P.; Koenig, K.; Shore, R.E.; Akhmedkhanov, A.; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A.; Riboli, E. Serum folate, homocysteine and colorectal cancer risk in women: A nested case-control study. Br. J. Cancer 1999, 79, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Cole, B.F.; Baron, J.A.; Sandler, R.S.; Haile, R.W.; Ahnen, D.J.; Bresalier, R.S.; McKeown-Eyssen, G.; Summers, R.W.; Rothstein, R.I.; Burke, C.A.; et al. Folic acid for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2007, 297, 2351–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ebbing, M.; Bonaa, K.H.; Nygard, O.; Arnesen, E.; Ueland, P.M.; Nordrehaug, J.E.; Rasmussen, K.; Njolstad, I.; Refsum, H.; Nilsen, D.W.; et al. Cancer incidence and mortality after treatment with folic acid and vitamin b12. JAMA 2009, 302, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Otani, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Hanaoka, T.; Kobayashi, M.; Ishihara, J.; Natsukawa, S.; Shaura, K.; Koizumi, Y.; Kasuga, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; et al. Folate, vitamin b6, vitamin b12, and vitamin b2 intake, genetic polymorphisms of related enzymes, and risk of colorectal cancer in a hospital-based case-control study in japan. Nutr. Cancer 2005, 53, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Hultdin, J.; Van Guelpen, B.; Bergh, A.; Hallmans, G.; Stattin, P. Plasma folate, vitamin b12, and homocysteine and prostate cancer risk: A prospective study. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 113, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Du, Y.F.; Lin, F.Y.; Long, W.Q.; Luo, W.P.; Yan, B.; Xu, M.; Mo, X.F.; Zhang, C.X. Serum betaine but not choline is inversely associated with breast cancer risk: A case-control study in china. Eur. J. Nutr. 2017, 56, 1329–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lu, M.S.; Fang, Y.J.; Pan, Z.Z.; Zhong, X.; Zheng, M.C.; Chen, Y.M.; Zhang, C.X. Choline and betaine intake and colorectal cancer risk in chinese population: A case-control study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zeng, F.F.; Xu, C.H.; Liu, Y.T.; Fan, Y.Y.; Lin, X.L.; Lu, Y.K.; Zhang, C.X.; Chen, Y.M. Choline and betaine intakes are associated with reduced risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in adults: A case-control study. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhou, R.F.; Chen, X.L.; Zhou, Z.G.; Zhang, Y.J.; Lan, Q.Y.; Liao, G.C.; Chen, Y.M.; Zhu, H.L. Higher dietary intakes of choline and betaine are associated with a lower risk of primary liver cancer: A case-control study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Nitter, M.; Norgard, B.; de Vogel, S.; Eussen, S.J.; Meyer, K.; Ulvik, A.; Ueland, P.M.; Nygard, O.; Vollset, S.E.; Bjorge, T.; et al. Plasma methionine, choline, betaine, and dimethylglycine in relation to colorectal cancer risk in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (epic). Ann. Oncol. 2014, 25, 1609–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Feigelson, H.S.; Jonas, C.R.; Robertson, A.S.; McCullough, M.L.; Thun, M.J.; Calle, E.E. Alcohol, folate, methionine, and risk of incident breast cancer in the american cancer society cancer prevention study ii nutrition cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2003, 12, 161–164. [Google Scholar]
  112. Donnelly, J.G. Folic acid. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2001, 38, 183–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Li, W.; Jiang, M.; Xiao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cui, S.; Huang, G. Folic acid inhibits tau phosphorylation through regulation of pp2a methylation in sh-sy5y cells. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2015, 19, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Keyes, M.K.; Jang, H.; Mason, J.B.; Liu, Z.; Crott, J.W.; Smith, D.E.; Friso, S.; Choi, S.W. Older age and dietary folate are determinants of genomic and p16-specific DNA methylation in mouse colon. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 1713–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cartron, P.F.; Hervouet, E.; Debien, E.; Olivier, C.; Pouliquen, D.; Menanteau, J.; Loussouarn, D.; Martin, S.A.; Campone, M.; Vallette, F.M. Folate supplementation limits the tumourigenesis in rodent models of gliomagenesis. Eur. J. Cancer 2012, 48, 2431–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. McKay, J.A.; Waltham, K.J.; Williams, E.A.; Mathers, J.C. Folate depletion during pregnancy and lactation reduces genomic DNA methylation in murine adult offspring. Genes Nutr. 2011, 6, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ly, A.; Lee, H.; Chen, J.; Sie, K.K.; Renlund, R.; Medline, A.; Sohn, K.J.; Croxford, R.; Thompson, L.U.; Kim, Y.I. Effect of maternal and postweaning folic acid supplementation on mammary tumor risk in the offspring. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 988–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sie, K.K.; Medline, A.; van Weel, J.; Sohn, K.J.; Choi, S.W.; Croxford, R.; Kim, Y.I. Effect of maternal and postweaning folic acid supplementation on colorectal cancer risk in the offspring. Gut 2011, 60, 1687–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Song, J.; Sohn, K.J.; Medline, A.; Ash, C.; Gallinger, S.; Kim, Y.I. Chemopreventive effects of dietary folate on intestinal polyps in apc+/-msh2-/- mice. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3191–3199. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kotsopoulos, J.; Sohn, K.J.; Kim, Y.I. Postweaning dietary folate deficiency provided through childhood to puberty permanently increases genomic DNA methylation in adult rat liver. J. Nutr. 2008, 138, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Pieroth, R.; Paver, S.; Day, S.; Lammersfeld, C. Folate and its impact on cancer risk. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2018, 7, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhao, Y.; Guo, C.; Hu, H.; Zheng, L.; Ma, J.; Jiang, L.; Zhao, E.; Li, H. Folate intake, serum folate levels and esophageal cancer risk: An overall and dose-response meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 10458–10469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Burr, N.E.; Hull, M.A.; Subramanian, V. Folic acid supplementation may reduce colorectal cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2017, 51, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, R.; Zheng, Y.; Huang, J.Y.; Zhang, A.Q.; Zhou, Y.H.; Wang, J.N. Folate intake, serum folate levels, and prostate cancer risk: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Guo, S.; Jiang, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, L.; Li, X.; Jia, Y. The protective effect of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase c677t polymorphism against prostate cancer risk: Evidence from 23 case-control studies. Gene 2015, 565, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Yi, K.; Yang, L.; Lan, Z.; Xi, M. The association between mthfr polymorphisms and cervical cancer risk: A system review and meta analysis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 294, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Joseph, D.B.; Strand, D.W.; Vezina, C.M. DNA methylation in development and disease: An overview for prostate researchers. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Urol. 2018, 6, 197–218. [Google Scholar]
  128. Okugawa, Y.; Grady, W.M.; Goel, A. Epigenetic alterations in colorectal cancer: Emerging biomarkers. Gastroenterology 2015, 149, 1204–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Giovannucci, E. Epidemiologic studies of folate and colorectal neoplasia: A review. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2350S–2355S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Flood, A.; Velie, E.M.; Chaterjee, N.; Subar, A.F.; Thompson, F.E.; Lacey, J.V., Jr.; Schairer, C.; Troisi, R.; Schatzkin, A. Fruit and vegetable intakes and the risk of colorectal cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project follow-up cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 75, 936–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Meyer, F.; White, E. Alcohol and nutrients in relation to colon cancer in middle-aged adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1993, 138, 225–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Slattery, M.L.; Potter, J.D.; Coates, A.; Ma, K.N.; Berry, T.D.; Duncan, D.M.; Caan, B.J. Plant foods and colon cancer: An assessment of specific foods and their related nutrients (united states). Cancer Causes Control. 1997, 8, 575–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sanjoaquin, M.A.; Allen, N.; Couto, E.; Roddam, A.W.; Key, T.J. Folate intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analytical approach. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 113, 825–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Qin, X.; Cui, Y.; Shen, L.; Sun, N.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, X.; Wang, B.; Xu, X.; Huo, Y.; et al. Folic acid supplementation and cancer risk: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Cravo, M.; Fidalgo, P.; Pereira, A.D.; Gouveia-Oliveira, A.; Chaves, P.; Selhub, J.; Mason, J.B.; Mira, F.C.; Leitao, C.N. DNA methylation as an intermediate biomarker in colorectal cancer: Modulation by folic acid supplementation. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1994, 3, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin b6, Folate, Vitamin b12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
  137. Zhang, Y.F.; Shi, W.W.; Gao, H.F.; Zhou, L.; Hou, A.J.; Zhou, Y.H. Folate intake and the risk of breast cancer: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Crary-Dooley, F.K.; Tam, M.E.; Dunaway, K.W.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Schmidt, R.J.; LaSalle, J.M. A comparison of existing global DNA methylation assays to low-coverage whole-genome bisulfite sequencing for epidemiological studies. Epigenetics 2017, 12, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Shiratori, H.; Feinweber, C.; Knothe, C.; Lotsch, J.; Thomas, D.; Geisslinger, G.; Parnham, M.J.; Resch, E. High-throughput analysis of global DNA methylation using methyl-sensitive digestion. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Kurdyukov, S.; Bullock, M. DNA methylation analysis: Choosing the right method. Biology 2016, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wu, H.C.; Delgado-Cruzata, L.; Flom, J.D.; Kappil, M.; Ferris, J.S.; Liao, Y.; Santella, R.M.; Terry, M.B. Global methylation profiles in DNA from different blood cell types. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Duman, E.A.; Kriaucionis, S.; Dunn, J.J.; Hatchwell, E. A simple modification to the luminometric methylation assay to control for the effects of DNA fragmentation. Biotechniques 2015, 58, 262–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Caiazza, F.; Ryan, E.J.; Doherty, G.; Winter, D.C.; Sheahan, K. Estrogen receptors and their implications in colorectal carcinogenesis. Front. Oncol. 2015, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Wang, Z.; Li, R.; He, Y.; Huang, S. Effects of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 on proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2018, 18, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Bruno, E.J., Jr.; Ziegenfuss, T.N. Water-soluble vitamins: Research update. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2005, 4, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Qiang, Y.; Li, Q.; Xin, Y.; Fang, X.; Tian, Y.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, R.; Wang, J.; et al. Intake of dietary one-carbon metabolism-related b vitamins and the risk of esophageal cancer: A dose-response meta-analysis. Nutrients 2018, 10, 835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kulkarni, A.; Dangat, K.; Kale, A.; Sable, P.; Chavan-Gautam, P.; Joshi, S. Effects of altered maternal folic acid, vitamin b12 and docosahexaenoic acid on placental global DNA methylation patterns in wistar rats. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e17706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sinclair, K.D.; Allegrucci, C.; Singh, R.; Gardner, D.S.; Sebastian, S.; Bispham, J.; Thurston, A.; Huntley, J.F.; Rees, W.D.; Maloney, C.A.; et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional b vitamin and methionine status. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19351–19356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ray, J.G.; Cole, D.E.; Boss, S.C. An ontario-wide study of vitamin b12, serum folate, and red cell folate levels in relation to plasma homocysteine: Is a preventable public health issue on the rise? Clin. Biochem. 2000, 33, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Robertson, J.; Iemolo, F.; Stabler, S.P.; Allen, R.H.; Spence, J.D. Vitamin b12, homocysteine and carotid plaque in the era of folic acid fortification of enriched cereal grain products. CMAJ 2005, 172, 1569–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Azadibakhsh, N.; Hosseini, R.S.; Atabak, S.; Nateghiyan, N.; Golestan, B.; Rad, A.H. Efficacy of folate and vitamin b12 in lowering homocysteine concentrations in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transplant. 2009, 20, 779–788. [Google Scholar]
  152. Gonin, J.M.; Nguyen, H.; Gonin, R.; Sarna, A.; Michels, A.; Masri-Imad, F.; Bommareddy, G.; Chassaing, C.; Wainer, I.; Loya, A.; et al. Controlled trials of very high dose folic acid, vitamins b12 and b6, intravenous folinic acid and serine for treatment of hyperhomocysteinemia in esrd. J. Nephrol. 2003, 16, 522–534. [Google Scholar]
  153. Johanning, G.L.; Heimburger, D.C.; Piyathilake, C.J. DNA methylation and diet in cancer. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 3814S–3818S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Hollenbeck, C.B. An introduction to the nutrition and metabolism of choline. Cent. Nerv. Syst. Agents Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 100–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ueland, P.M. Choline and betaine in health and disease. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2011, 34, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Craig, S.A. Betaine in human nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Zeisel, S.H. Choline: An essential nutrient for humans. Nutrition 2000, 16, 669–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Jacob, R.A.; Jenden, D.J.; Allman-Farinelli, M.A.; Swendseid, M.E. Folate nutriture alters choline status of women and men fed low choline diets. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 712–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Barak, A.J.; Beckenhauer, H.C.; Kharbanda, K.K.; Tuma, D.J. Chronic ethanol consumption increases homocysteine accumulation in hepatocytes. Alcohol 2001, 25, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Melse-Boonstra, A.; Holm, P.I.; Ueland, P.M.; Olthof, M.; Clarke, R.; Verhoef, P. Betaine concentration as a determinant of fasting total homocysteine concentrations and the effect of folic acid supplementation on betaine concentrations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 1378–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Lee, J.E.; Jacques, P.F.; Dougherty, L.; Selhub, J.; Giovannucci, E.; Zeisel, S.H.; Cho, E. Are dietary choline and betaine intakes determinants of total homocysteine concentration? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1303–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Brouwer, I.A.; Verhoef, P.; Urgert, R. Betaine supplementation and plasma homocysteine in healthy volunteers. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000, 160, 2546–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Niculescu, M.D.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Dietary choline deficiency alters global and gene-specific DNA methylation in the developing hippocampus of mouse fetal brains. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Mehedint, M.G.; Niculescu, M.D.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Choline deficiency alters global histone methylation and epigenetic marking at the re1 site of the calbindin 1 gene. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Mehedint, M.G.; Craciunescu, C.N.; Zeisel, S.H. Maternal dietary choline deficiency alters angiogenesis in fetal mouse hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12834–12839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Kovacheva, V.P.; Mellott, T.J.; Davison, J.M.; Wagner, N.; Lopez-Coviella, I.; Schnitzler, A.C.; Blusztajn, J.K. Gestational choline deficiency causes global and igf2 gene DNA hypermethylation by up-regulation of dnmt1 expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31777–31788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Stefanska, B.; Karlic, H.; Varga, F.; Fabianowska-Majewska, K.; Haslberger, A. Epigenetic mechanisms in anti-cancer actions of bioactive food components--the implications in cancer prevention. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 167, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. da Costa, K.A.; Cochary, E.F.; Blusztajn, J.K.; Garner, S.C.; Zeisel, S.H. Accumulation of 1,2-sn-diradylglycerol with increased membrane-associated protein kinase c may be the mechanism for spontaneous hepatocarcinogenesis in choline-deficient rats. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 2100–2105. [Google Scholar]
  169. da Costa, K.A.; Garner, S.C.; Chang, J.; Zeisel, S.H. Effects of prolonged (1 year) choline deficiency and subsequent re-feeding of choline on 1,2-sn-diradylglycerol, fatty acids and protein kinase c in rat liver. Carcinogenesis 1995, 16, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shivapurkar, N.; Poirier, L.A. Tissue levels of s-adenosylmethionine and s-adenosylhomocysteine in rats fed methyl-deficient, amino acid-defined diets for one to five weeks. Carcinogenesis 1983, 4, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Tsujiuchi, T.; Tsutsumi, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Takahama, M.; Konishi, Y. Hypomethylation of cpg sites and c-myc gene overexpression in hepatocellular carcinomas, but not hyperplastic nodules, induced by a choline-deficient l-amino acid-defined diet in rats. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1999, 90, 909–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Tryndyak, V.P.; Han, T.; Muskhelishvili, L.; Fuscoe, J.C.; Ross, S.A.; Beland, F.A.; Pogribny, I.P. Coupling global methylation and gene expression profiles reveal key pathophysiological events in liver injury induced by a methyl-deficient diet. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2011, 55, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Lupu, D.S.; Orozco, L.D.; Wang, Y.; Cullen, J.M.; Pellegrini, M.; Zeisel, S.H. Altered methylation of specific DNA loci in the liver of bhmt-null mice results in repression of iqgap2 and f2rl2 and is associated with development of preneoplastic foci. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 2090–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sun, S.; Li, X.; Ren, A.; Du, M.; Du, H.; Shu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, W. Choline and betaine consumption lowers cancer risk: A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Guedes, R.L.; Prosdocimi, F.; Fernandes, G.R.; Moura, L.K.; Ribeiro, H.A.; Ortega, J.M. Amino acids biosynthesis and nitrogen assimilation pathways: A great genomic deletion during eukaryotes evolution. BMC Genom. 2011, 12 (Suppl. 4), S2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Martinez, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, G.; Bin, P.; Yan, W.; Mas, D.; Valdivie, M.; Hu, C.A.; Ren, W.; Yin, Y. The role of methionine on metabolism, oxidative stress, and diseases. Amino Acids 2017, 49, 2091–2098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Finkelstein, J.D. Methionine metabolism in mammals. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1990, 1, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhang, N. Role of methionine on epigenetic modification of DNA methylation and gene expression in animals. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 4, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Finkelstein, J.D.; Martin, J.J. Methionine metabolism in mammals. Adaptation to methionine excess. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 1582–1587. [Google Scholar]
  180. Regina, M.; Korhonen, V.P.; Smith, T.K.; Alakuijala, L.; Eloranta, T.O. Methionine toxicity in the rat in relation to hepatic accumulation of s-adenosylmethionine: Prevention by dietary stimulation of the hepatic transsulfuration pathway. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1993, 300, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Waterland, R.A. Assessing the effects of high methionine intake on DNA methylation. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1706S–1710S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Rowling, M.J.; McMullen, M.H.; Chipman, D.C.; Schalinske, K.L. Hepatic glycine n-methyltransferase is up-regulated by excess dietary methionine in rats. J. Nutr. 2002, 132, 2545–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Amaral, C.L.; Bueno Rde, B.; Burim, R.V.; Queiroz, R.H.; Bianchi Mde, L.; Antunes, L.M. The effects of dietary supplementation of methionine on genomic stability and p53 gene promoter methylation in rats. Mutat. Res. 2011, 722, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Uekawa, A.; Katsushima, K.; Ogata, A.; Kawata, T.; Maeda, N.; Kobayashi, K.; Maekawa, A.; Tadokoro, T.; Yamamoto, Y. Change of epigenetic control of cystathionine beta-synthase gene expression through dietary vitamin b12 is not recovered by methionine supplementation. J. Nutr. Nutr. 2009, 2, 29–36. [Google Scholar]
  185. Miousse, I.R.; Pathak, R.; Garg, S.; Skinner, C.M.; Melnyk, S.; Pavliv, O.; Hendrickson, H.; Landes, R.D.; Lumen, A.; Tackett, A.J.; et al. Short-term dietary methionine supplementation affects one-carbon metabolism and DNA methylation in the mouse gut and leads to altered microbiome profiles, barrier function, gene expression and histomorphology. Genes Nutr. 2017, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Zhou, Z.Y.; Wan, X.Y.; Cao, J.W. Dietary methionine intake and risk of incident colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 8 prospective studies involving 431,029 participants. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Vidal, A.C.; Grant, D.J.; Williams, C.D.; Masko, E.; Allott, E.H.; Shuler, K.; McPhail, M.; Gaines, A.; Calloway, E.; Gerber, L.; et al. Associations between intake of folate, methionine, and vitamins b-12, b-6 and prostate cancer risk in american veterans. J. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012, 2012, 957467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Durando, X.; Farges, M.C.; Buc, E.; Abrial, C.; Petorin-Lesens, C.; Gillet, B.; Vasson, M.P.; Pezet, D.; Chollet, P.; Thivat, E. Dietary methionine restriction with folfox regimen as first line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: A feasibility study. Oncology 2010, 78, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Epner, D.E.; Morrow, S.; Wilcox, M.; Houghton, J.L. Nutrient intake and nutritional indexes in adults with metastatic cancer on a phase i clinical trial of dietary methionine restriction. Nutr. Cancer 2002, 42, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Thivat, E.; Durando, X.; Demidem, A.; Farges, M.C.; Rapp, M.; Cellarier, E.; Guenin, S.; D’Incan, M.; Vasson, M.P.; Chollet, P. A methionine-free diet associated with nitrosourea treatment down-regulates methylguanine-DNA methyl transferase activity in patients with metastatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007, 27, 2779–2783. [Google Scholar]
  191. Thivat, E.; Farges, M.C.; Bacin, F.; D’Incan, M.; Mouret-Reynier, M.A.; Cellarier, E.; Madelmont, J.C.; Vasson, M.P.; Chollet, P.; Durando, X. Phase ii trial of the association of a methionine-free diet with cystemustine therapy in melanoma and glioma. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 5235–5240. [Google Scholar]
  192. Wu, W.; Kang, S.; Zhang, D. Association of vitamin b6, vitamin b12 and methionine with risk of breast cancer: A dose-response meta-analysis. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 109, 1926–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Lu, S.C.; Huang, Z.Z.; Yang, H.; Mato, J.M.; Avila, M.A.; Tsukamoto, H. Changes in methionine adenosyltransferase and s-adenosylmethionine homeostasis in alcoholic rat liver. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2000, 279, G178–G185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Martinez-Chantar, M.L.; Corrales, F.J.; Martinez-Cruz, L.A.; Garcia-Trevijano, E.R.; Huang, Z.Z.; Chen, L.; Kanel, G.; Avila, M.A.; Mato, J.M.; Lu, S.C. Spontaneous oxidative stress and liver tumors in mice lacking methionine adenosyltransferase 1a. FASEB J. 2002, 16, 1292–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Medici, V.; Halsted, C.H. Folate, alcohol, and liver disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Richmond, R.C.; Joubert, B.R. Contrasting the effects of intra-uterine smoking and one-carbon micronutrient exposures on offspring DNA methylation. Epigenomics 2017, 9, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Markunas, C.A.; Xu, Z.; Harlid, S.; Wade, P.A.; Lie, R.T.; Taylor, J.A.; Wilcox, A.J. Identification of DNA methylation changes in newborns related to maternal smoking during pregnancy. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Tuenter, A.; Bautista Nino, P.K.; Vitezova, A.; Pantavos, A.; Bramer, W.M.; Franco, O.H.; Felix, J.F. Folate, vitamin b12, and homocysteine in smoking-exposed pregnant women: A systematic review. Matern. Child. Nutr. 2018, 15, e12675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Piyathilake, C.J.; Macaluso, M.; Hine, R.J.; Richards, E.W.; Krumdieck, C.L. Local and systemic effects of cigarette smoking on folate and vitamin b-12. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994, 60, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Mozhui, K.; Smith, A.K.; Tylavsky, F.A. Ancestry dependent DNA methylation and influence of maternal nutrition. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Altmann, S.; Murani, E.; Schwerin, M.; Metges, C.C.; Wimmers, K.; Ponsuksili, S. Dietary protein restriction and excess of pregnant german landrace sows induce changes in hepatic gene expression and promoter methylation of key metabolic genes in the offspring. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2013, 24, 484–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Sandovici, I.; Smith, N.H.; Nitert, M.D.; Ackers-Johnson, M.; Uribe-Lewis, S.; Ito, Y.; Jones, R.H.; Marquez, V.E.; Cairns, W.; Tadayyon, M.; et al. Maternal diet and aging alter the epigenetic control of a promoter-enhancer interaction at the hnf4a gene in rat pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5449–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Tosh, D.N.; Fu, Q.; Callaway, C.W.; McKnight, R.A.; McMillen, I.C.; Ross, M.G.; Lane, R.H.; Desai, M. Epigenetics of programmed obesity: Alteration in iugr rat hepatic igf1 mrna expression and histone structure in rapid vs. Delayed postnatal catch-up growth. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2010, 299, G1023–G1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Marco, A.; Kisliouk, T.; Tabachnik, T.; Meiri, N.; Weller, A. Overweight and cpg methylation of the pomc promoter in offspring of high-fat-diet-fed dams are not “reprogrammed” by regular chow diet in rats. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 4148–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Ge, Z.J.; Luo, S.M.; Lin, F.; Liang, Q.X.; Huang, L.; Wei, Y.C.; Hou, Y.; Han, Z.M.; Schatten, H.; Sun, Q.Y. DNA methylation in oocytes and liver of female mice and their offspring: Effects of high-fat-diet-induced obesity. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Medici, V.; Kieffer, D.A.; Shibata, N.M.; Chima, H.; Kim, K.; Canovas, A.; Medrano, J.F.; Islas-Trejo, A.D.; Kharbanda, K.K.; Olson, K.; et al. Wilson disease: Epigenetic effects of choline supplementation on phenotype and clinical course in a mouse model. Epigenetics 2016, 11, 804–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Tobi, E.W.; Lumey, L.H.; Talens, R.P.; Kremer, D.; Putter, H.; Stein, A.D.; Slagboom, P.E.; Heijmans, B.T. DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing- and sex-specific. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 4046–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Heijmans, B.T.; Tobi, E.W.; Stein, A.D.; Putter, H.; Blauw, G.J.; Susser, E.S.; Slagboom, P.E.; Lumey, L.H. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17046–17049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Steegers-Theunissen, R.P.; Obermann-Borst, S.A.; Kremer, D.; Lindemans, J.; Siebel, C.; Steegers, E.A.; Slagboom, P.E.; Heijmans, B.T. Periconceptional maternal folic acid use of 400 microg per day is related to increased methylation of the igf2 gene in the very young child. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Pauwels, S.; Ghosh, M.; Duca, R.C.; Bekaert, B.; Freson, K.; Huybrechts, I.; Langie, S.A.S.; Koppen, G.; Devlieger, R.; Godderis, L. Maternal intake of methyl-group donors affects DNA methylation of metabolic genes in infants. Clin. Epigenet. 2017, 9, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Fryer, A.A.; Nafee, T.M.; Ismail, K.M.; Carroll, W.D.; Emes, R.D.; Farrell, W.E. Line-1 DNA methylation is inversely correlated with cord plasma homocysteine in man: A preliminary study. Epigenetics 2009, 4, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Fryer, A.A.; Emes, R.D.; Ismail, K.M.; Haworth, K.E.; Mein, C.; Carroll, W.D.; Farrell, W.E. Quantitative, high-resolution epigenetic profiling of cpg loci identifies associations with cord blood plasma homocysteine and birth weight in humans. Epigenetics 2011, 6, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wang, M.; Li, K.; Zhao, D.; Li, L. The association between maternal use of folic acid supplements during pregnancy and risk of autism spectrum disorders in children: A meta-analysis. Mol. Autism 2017, 8, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Dessypris, N.; Karalexi, M.A.; Ntouvelis, E.; Diamantaras, A.A.; Papadakis, V.; Baka, M.; Hatzipantelis, E.; Kourti, M.; Moschovi, M.; Polychronopoulou, S.; et al. Association of maternal and index child’s diet with subsequent leukemia risk: A systematic review and meta analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2017, 47, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Xu, A.; Cao, X.; Lu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, X. A meta-analysis of the relationship between maternal folic acid supplementation and the risk of congenital heart defects. Int. Heart J. 2016, 57, 725–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Blanco, R.; Colombo, A.; Pardo, R.; Suazo, J. Maternal biomarkers of methylation status and non-syndromic orofacial cleft risk: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2016, 45, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 11 00608 g001 550
Figure 1. Micronutrient methyl donors that are involved in the one carbon metabolism and subsequently in DNA methylation. Dietary folate is converted to dihydrofolate (DHF) via the dihydrofolate synthase (DHFS) enzyme then to tetrahydrofolate (THF) by the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) enzyme; in both steps, vitamin B3 (B3) acts as a co-factor. THF is then converted to 5,10-methyl THF via the enzyme serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) that has vitamin B6 (B6) as a coenzyme. This reaction is followed by a reduction of 5,10-methyl THF to 5-methyl THF via the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and the co-enzyme, vitamin B2 (B2). At the end of this cycle, 5-methyl THF is transformed back to THF by the enzyme 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR) that utilizes vitamin B2 as a co-enzyme. The same enzyme, MTR, converts homocysteine (Hcy) to methionine. Betaine acts as an indirect methyl donor for the latter reaction. Methionine, whether it is endogenously synthesized or diet-derived is critical for the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which acts as a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) cofactor and a universal methyl-donor for DNA methylation. The enzyme that catalyzes this reaction is methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT). Glycine N-methyltransferase (Glycine N-MT) converts SAM to s-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), which could be reversibly converted to Hcy via the enzyme SAH hydrolase. Finally, the activated DNMT enzyme will catalyze the transfer of a methyl group to carbon 5 of cytosines in the DNA to produce methylated DNA (mDNA).
Figure 1. Micronutrient methyl donors that are involved in the one carbon metabolism and subsequently in DNA methylation. Dietary folate is converted to dihydrofolate (DHF) via the dihydrofolate synthase (DHFS) enzyme then to tetrahydrofolate (THF) by the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) enzyme; in both steps, vitamin B3 (B3) acts as a co-factor. THF is then converted to 5,10-methyl THF via the enzyme serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT) that has vitamin B6 (B6) as a coenzyme. This reaction is followed by a reduction of 5,10-methyl THF to 5-methyl THF via the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and the co-enzyme, vitamin B2 (B2). At the end of this cycle, 5-methyl THF is transformed back to THF by the enzyme 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR) that utilizes vitamin B2 as a co-enzyme. The same enzyme, MTR, converts homocysteine (Hcy) to methionine. Betaine acts as an indirect methyl donor for the latter reaction. Methionine, whether it is endogenously synthesized or diet-derived is critical for the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), which acts as a DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) cofactor and a universal methyl-donor for DNA methylation. The enzyme that catalyzes this reaction is methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT). Glycine N-methyltransferase (Glycine N-MT) converts SAM to s-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), which could be reversibly converted to Hcy via the enzyme SAH hydrolase. Finally, the activated DNMT enzyme will catalyze the transfer of a methyl group to carbon 5 of cytosines in the DNA to produce methylated DNA (mDNA).
Nutrients 11 00608 g001
Nutrients 11 00608 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of DNA methylation and its effect on gene transcription. DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) converts cytosine to 5′methyl-cytosine. The process involves the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the cytosine resulting in the conversion of DNA to methylated DNA and methylated SAM to non-methylated S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). DNA methylation recruits histone deacetylase (HDAC), methyl binding proteins (MBPs), and other transcription repressing factors. These modifications result in closed chromatin conformation, inaccessibility to transcriptional machinery, and eventually gene silencing.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of DNA methylation and its effect on gene transcription. DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) converts cytosine to 5′methyl-cytosine. The process involves the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the cytosine resulting in the conversion of DNA to methylated DNA and methylated SAM to non-methylated S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). DNA methylation recruits histone deacetylase (HDAC), methyl binding proteins (MBPs), and other transcription repressing factors. These modifications result in closed chromatin conformation, inaccessibility to transcriptional machinery, and eventually gene silencing.
Nutrients 11 00608 g002
Table
Table 1. Clinical studies of the impact of methyl donor micronutrients on DNA methylation.
Table 1. Clinical studies of the impact of methyl donor micronutrients on DNA methylation.
AuthorsPopulation/TissueStudy DesignMethylation AssayConclusion/Outcome
Folate
Wallace et al. [56]Adults with history of colorectal adenoma
Colorectal tissues		Randomized, double-blind controlled trial
1 mg/day for 3 years		Gene-specific quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing
ERα and SFRP1 genes		Higher folate levels were associated with higher levels of ERα (estrogen receptor alpha) and SFRP1 (Secreted Frizzled Related Protein 1) methylation
Pufulete et al. [57]Colorectal adenoma and cancer patients and heathy controls
Colonic tissues		Case-control study
Estimates of dietary intake and serum and erythrocyte folate		Global DNA methylation via [(3)H] methyl incorporationHigh folate status was associated with decreased plasma homocysteine and increased colonic DNA methylation.
Low folate intake and colonic DNA hypomethylation were associated with increased risk for adenoma and cancer
Piyathilake et al. [58]Patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Cervical tissues		Cross-sectional study
Dietary intake pre and post folic acid fortification		Global DNA methylation via Immunohistochemical staining for 5-methyl cytosineFolic acid fortification did not change global DNA methylation in cells involved in cervical carcinogenesis
Moore et al. [59]Patients with bladder cancer and controls
Blood		Case-control study
Dietary intake via food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)		Global DNA methylation via 5-methyl cytosine antibodyGlobal DNA methylation was significantly lower in cases than control.
No significant differences in folate intake between cases and control
Piyathilake et al. [60]Patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and controls
Blood and exfoliated cervical cells		Case-control study
Serum levels measured		Global DNA methylation via bisulfite pyrosequencing LINE-1 (Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element 1) analysisBlood cell (but not cervical cell) DNA was hypomethylated in cases compared to controls and hypermethylated in the highest folate compared to the lowest folate tertile.
Pufulete et al. [61]Healthy adults
Colonic tissues		Cross-sectional study
Serum and erythrocyte levels measured 		Global DNA methylation via [(3)H] methyl incorporationObserved weak inverted associations between serum and erythrocyte folate and colonic DNA hypomethylation
O’Reilly et al. [62]Patients with colorectal adenoma
Colonic tissues		Randomized, double-blind controlled trial
600 μg folic acid/day for 6 months		Global DNA methylation via methylation-sensitive restriction enzymesFolate treatment significantly reversed global DNA hypomethylation in colonic tissues
Cravo et al. [63]Patients with colorectal adenoma
Colonic tissues		Randomized, controlled, cross-over study
5 mg/day for 3 months then switched to placebo for additional 3 months		Global DNA methylation via [(3)H] methyl incorporationFolate supplementation reversed DNA Hypomethylation, which returned to baseline values after switching to placebo treatment
Kim et al. [64]Patients with colorectal adenoma
Colonic tissues		Randomized, double-blind controlled trial
5 mg/day for 1 year		Global DNA methylationFolate supplementation increased genomic DNA methylation at 6 months and 1 year
Coppedè et al. [65]Patients with colorectal cancer
Colonic tissues (cancer and adjacent healthy)		Cross-sectional analysis
Serum levels were measured		Gene-specific quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing
APC (adenomatous polyposis coli), MGMT (Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase), hMLH1 (MutL homolog 1), RASSF1A and CDKN2A (cyclin-dependent kinase 2A) genes		Low folate levels were associated with hMLH1 hypermethylation
Christensen et al. [66]Breast cancer patients
Breast cancer tissues		The Pathways Study: a prospective cohort study
Estimates of dietary intake		Genome-wide methylation analysis via Illumina GoldenGate methylation bead-array platformHigher folate intake was associated with a trend toward increased CpG methylation in several genes
Vineis et al. [67]Patients with lung cancer and healthy controls
Blood		Nested case-control study in The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
Serum levels were measured		Genome-wide quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing Folate was associated with increased methylation levels of RASSF1A (Ras association domain family member 1) and MTHFR (methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase)
van Engeland et al. [68]Patients with colorectal cancer
Colorectal biopsies		Netherland Cohort Study (NLCS)
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Methylation-specific PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for APC-1A (adenomatous polyposis coli-1A), p14(ARF) (alternate reading frame protein of cyclin-dependent kinase 2A), p16(INK4A) (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 4A), hMLH1, O(6)-MGMT (O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase), and RASSF1A genesGene promoters were hypermethylated in patients with low folate intake compared with high folate intake; differences were not statistically significant
Ba et al. [69]Pregnant women
Maternal and cord blood		Cross-sectional study
Serum levels were measured		Methylation-specific PCR for IGF2 geneIGF2 promoter methylation was not associated with serum folate levels in either cord or maternal blood
Hoyo et al. [70]Pregnant women
Cord blood		Cross-sectional study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Gene-specific (IGF-2) quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencingIGF-2 methylation decreased with increasing folate intake
Shelnutt et al. [71]Healthy non-pregnant women
Blood		Folate depletion-repletion clinical trial
115 μg/day for 7 weeks followed by 400 μg/day for additional 7 weeks		Global DNA methylation via [(3)H] methyl incorporationObserved global DNA hypomethylation during depletion and increases in DNA methylation during repletion
Vitamin B
Colacino et al. [72]Patients with head and neck cancerCross-sectional study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Gene-specific methylation analysis via Illumina Goldengate Methylation Cancer PanelPatients with the highest quartile of vitamin B12 intake showed significantly less tumor suppressor gene methylation compared with those in the lowest quartile
Piyathilake et al. [73]Patients with lung cancer
Cancer tissue and adjacent normal bronchial tissue		Cross-sectional study
Tissue levels were measured		Global DNA methylation via [(3)H] methyl incorporationA direct association was reported between vitamin B-12 and global DNA methylation in cancer tissues but not in normal tissues
Perng et al. [74]School-age children
Blood		Cross-sectional study
Plasma levels were measured		Global DNA methylation via bisulfite pyrosequencing LINE-1 analysisNo association between vitamin B12 and global DNA methylation
Hubner, et al. [75]Old adults
Blood		Clinical trial
500 µg folic acid, 500 µg vitamin B12 and 50 mg vitamin B6 for 1 year		Global DNA methylation via bisulfite pyrosequencing LINE-1 analysisVitamin B supplementation had no effect on global DNA methylation in blood cells
Piyathilake et al. [76]Women positive for human papilloma virus
Exfoliated cervical cells		Cross-sectional study
Plasma levels were measured		Gene-specific (HPV(human papilloma virus)-16) quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencingFolate and vitamin B12, maintain a high degree of methylation at specific CpG sites in the HPV E6 gene and subsequently reduce the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
Choline and betaine
Pauwels et al. [77]Pregnant women
Blood		MANOE (MAternal Nutrition and Offspring’s Epigenome) cohort study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Global DNA (hydroxy)methylation was measured in blood using LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry)Choline and betaine intake in the first weeks was negatively associated with DNA hydroxymethylation (a step that precedes demethylation)
Chiuve et al. [78]Healthy women
Blood		Cross-sectional study from The Nurses’ Health Study (NHS)
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Plasma total homocysteine measurement via HPLC (high performance liquid chromatography)Total choline + betaine intake was inversely associated with homocysteine (measured as a surrogate biomarker for effective methyl donation and DNMT activity)
Schwab et al. [79]Obese adults
Blood		Randomized, double-blind controlled trial
Betaine supplements (6 gm/day) for 12 weeks		Plasma total homocysteine measurement via HPLCBetaine supplementation decreased the plasma homocysteine concentration
Olthof et al. [80]Healthy men
Blood		Randomized, double-blind controlled trial
Choline supplements (2.6 gm/day) for 2 weeks		Plasma total homocysteine measurement via HPLCCholine supplementation decreased the plasma homocysteine concentration
Methionine
Vineis et al. [67]Details are in the folate section of the tableMethionine was associated with decreased methylation of RASSF1A gene
Pauwels et al. [77]Details are in the choline and betaine section of the tableA high intake of methionine showed lower DNA hydroxymethylation (a step that precedes demethylation)
Perng et al. [81]Healthy adults
Blood		Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Stress Study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Global DNA methylation via bisulfite pyrosequencing LINE-1 analysisDietary methionine was not associated with global DNA methylation
Tao et al. [82]Breast cancer patients and control
Breast cancer tissue		Cross-sectional study from the Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer Study (WEB Study)
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ 		Methylation-specific PCR of E-cadherin, p16, and RAR-β(2) (retinoic acid receptor beta 2) genesDietary intake of methionine was not associated with promoter methylation of E-cadherin, p16, and RAR-β(2) genes
Table
Table 2. Clinical studies of the impact of methyl donor micronutrients on cancer.
Table 2. Clinical studies of the impact of methyl donor micronutrients on cancer.
AuthorsPopulation/TissueStudy DesignConclusion/Outcome
Folate
Giovannucci et al. [83]Male and female adultsThe Nurses’ Health Study, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		High dietary folate was inversely associated with risk of colorectal adenoma in women and men
Su et al. [84]Male and female adultsThe NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (NHEFS)
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Significant association between folate intake and lower risk of colon cancer among men and non-alcohol drinkers, but not women or alcohol drinkers
Fuchs et al. [85]Female adultThe Nurses’ Health Study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Higher folate intake reduces the risk of colon cancer associated with a family history of the disease.
Stevens et al. [86]Male adultThe American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Higher intake of folate was associated with a nonsignificant decrease in the risk of advanced prostate cancer
Gylling et al. [87]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlsThe Nurses’ Health StudyLow plasma levels of folate were associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer
Giovannucci et al. [88]Female adultA nested case-control study in the population-based Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Folate intake was associated with a lower risk for colon cancer
Konings et al. [89]Male and female adultsThe Netherlands Cohort Study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		The study reported an inverse association between colon cancer risk and total dietary folate intake.
Terry et al. [90]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlsA nested case-control study in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Folate intake was inversely associated with the risk of colorectal cancer
Wei et al. [91]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlsA nested case-control study in the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and the Health Professionals Follow Up Study (HPFS)
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Folate intake was associated with lower risk of colon cancer; however, rectal cancer cases tended to have slightly higher folate
Harnack et al. [92]Female adultsPopulation-based Iowa Women’s Health Study cohort
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		There were no independent associations of folate with incidence of colon cancer; however, relative risk was lower among those who had a combined high folate and high vitamin B-12 or high folate and vitamin B6.
Benito et al. [93]Colorectal cancer and matched controlsA case-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Folate intake was associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer
Ferraroni et al. [94]Colorectal cancer and matched controlsA case-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		There was a trend of a protective effect of high folate intake against colorectal cancer development
Freudenheim et al. [95]Colorectal cancer and matched controlsA case-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Folate intake was associated with a reduced risk of rectal cancer but not colon cancer
Glynn et al. [96]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlA nested case-control study within the Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Study cohort of male smokers
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ and serum levels were measured		No association between serum folate and colorectal cancer.
High dietary folate intake was protective against colorectal cancer.
La Vecchia et al. [97]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		No association between dietary folate and risk of colorectal cancer
Le Marchand et al. [98]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Decreased risk of colorectal cancer in subjects who consume high levels of folate and vitamin B6
Levi et al. [99]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		No significant association between folate intake and colorectal cancer
Boutron-Ruault et al. [100]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Folate intake prevents adenoma formation and protective against adenoma growth associated with alcohol
Kato et al. [101]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlA nested case-control study in the New York University Women’s Health Study cohort
Serum levels were measured		The risk of colorectal cancer in the subjects in the highest quartile of serum folate concentrations was half that of those in the lowest quartile
Cole et al. [102]Patients with colorectal adenomaRandomized, double-blind controlled trial
1 mg/day of folic acid for 3 years		Folic acid at 1 mg/day does not reduce the risk of colorectal adenomas or their advancement to neoplastic lesions
Ebbing et al. [103]Male and female adults with ischemic heart diseaseNorwegian Vitamin Trial and Western Norway B Vitamin Intervention Trial
folic acid (0.8 mg/day) plus vitamin B12 (0.4 mg/day) for 6–7 years		Folic acid plus vitamin B12 supplementations were associated with increased cancer outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease
Vitamin B
Otani et al. [104]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Neither vitamin B2, vitamin B6, nor vitamin B12 were significantly associated with colorectal cancer
Hultdin et al. [105]Patients with prostate cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Serum levels were measured		Serum concentrations of vitamin B12 were associated with an up to three-fold increase in prostate cancer risk
Gylling et al. [87]Details are in the folate section of the tablePlasma levels of vitamin B12 were inversely associated with rectal cancer risk
Choline and Betaine
Du et al. [106]Patients with breast cancer and matched controlA hospital-based case-control study
Serum levels were measured		Serum betaine but not choline was inversely associated with risk of breast cancer development in subjects with below-median dietary folate intake
Lu et al. [107]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Total choline intake was inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk however no significant associations were observed for betaine or total choline plus betaine intakes
Zeng et al. [108]Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Intakes of total choline, betaine, and combined choline and betaine were inversely associated with nasopharyngeal cancer
Zhou et al. [109]Patients with liver cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		Higher intake of choline and betaine was associated with a lower risk of liver cancer
Nitter et al. [110]Patients with colorectal cancer and matched controlA nested case-control study within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)
Plasma concentrations were measured		Higher betaine and choline concentrations were associated with lower risk of colorectal cancer especially in subjects with lower folate concentrations
Methionine
Feigelson et al. [111]Patients with prostate cancer and matched controlCase-control study
Estimated dietary intake via FFQ		A direct association between higher methionine intake and prostate cancer risk was observed only in men who have at least one MTHFR A1298C allele
Giovannucci et al. [83]Details are in the folate section of the tableMethionine intake was inversely associated with risk of having larger adenomas (1 cm or larger)
Su et al. [84]Details are in the folate section of the tableSignificantly increased risk of colon cancer in men who consume low-methionine diet compared to those who consume high methionine diet
Fuchs et al. [85]Details are in the folate section of the tableHigher intake of methionine reduces the risk of colon cancer associated with a family history of the disease
Nitter et al. [110]Details are in the betaine and choline section of the tableMethionine concentrations were inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk with borderline significance

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmoud, A.M.; Ali, M.M. Methyl Donor Micronutrients that Modify DNA Methylation and Cancer Outcome. Nutrients 2019, 11, 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030608

AMA Style

Mahmoud AM, Ali MM. Methyl Donor Micronutrients that Modify DNA Methylation and Cancer Outcome. Nutrients. 2019; 11(3):608. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmoud, Abeer M., and Mohamed M. Ali. 2019. "Methyl Donor Micronutrients that Modify DNA Methylation and Cancer Outcome" Nutrients 11, no. 3: 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030608

APA Style

Mahmoud, A. M., & Ali, M. M. (2019). Methyl Donor Micronutrients that Modify DNA Methylation and Cancer Outcome. Nutrients, 11(3), 608. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop